The first Sonic the Hedgehog movie was surprisingly great (certainly more so than the outright terrible Borderlands or the all too safe Super Mario Bros.), thanks to a genuinely funny script and Jim Carrey going wild as Dr. Robotnik. After introducing Idris Elba's Knuckles in the second film (andhis own Paramount+ TV series), now we're getting Sonic's broody counterpart Shadow in Sonic the Hedgehog 3.
Voiced by Keanu Reeves, who sounds like an angstier John Wick in the trailer, Shadow is introduced as an alien who has lived through tragedy and is out for some unspecified revenge. (His real problem though, as fans of the Fast and Furious franchise will tell you, is his lack of #family.)
Judging from the trailer, Sonic the Hedgehog 3 clearly feels like the third entry in a franchise. Sonic and Knuckles are now frenemies who've banded together, alongside Tails, to form the Sonic Team. But when confronted with Shadow's anger and nihilism, they have no choice but to team up with Robotnik to take him down. Personally, I'm just hoping Shadow at some point says, "I'm going to need a gun."
Sonic the Hedgehog 3 hits theaters December 20th.
Paramount
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/tv-movies/sonic-the-hedgehog-3-trailer-introduces-keanu-reeves-broody-shadow-134106308.html?src=rss
This week, Devindra and Cherlynn dive into Engadget's reviews on Google's Pixel 9 and 9 Pro phones. Are they really a step up from last year's devices? And how do they compare to Samsung's latest? Also, we chat about a few stories from Gamescom 2024, including Microsoft's Indiana Jones game heading to the PS5, as well as the wild launch of Black Myth: Wukong.
Listen below or subscribe on your podcast app of choice. If you've got suggestions or topics you'd like covered on the show, be sure to email us or drop a note in the comments! And be sure to check out our other podcast, Engadget News!
Topics
Google approaches smartphone perfection with the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro – 0:58
Gamescom highlights: Indiana Jones, AI NPCs and Black Myth: Wukong – 22:15
xMEMS’ 1mm ultrasonic ‘fan on a chip’ breakthrough could enable super-thin devices – 49:31
San Francisco city attorney takes aim at AI deepfake pornography – 52:29
Chik-Fil-A wants to start a streaming service. Yes, you read that correctly – 52:52.
British Billionaire Mike Lynch, founder of tech firm Autonomy, found dead in the wreckage of his yacht – 55:48
Hosts: Devindra Hardawar and Cherlynn Low Producer: Ben Ellman Music: Dale North and Terrence O'Brien
Transcript
Devindra: [00:00:00] What's up, Internet, and welcome back to the Engadget Podcast. I'm Senior Editor Devindra Hardawar.
Cherlynn: I'm Deputy Editor Cherlynn Low.
Devindra: This week, we've got reviews for the Pixel 9 and 9 Pro and XLs and all the various Pixel 9 models, except for the Fold that's not out yet. So that's very sad. That's gonna be a couple weeks away.
And we've also got some news from Gamescom 2024, which is, I guess, still happening. But most of the major news has already happened from the opening night and some followup events. And yeah, got some weekly news as well. As always, folks, if you're enjoying the show, please be sure to subscribe to us on iTunes or your podcatcher of choice, leave us a review on iTunes and drop us an email at podcastengadget.
com and join us Thursdays, typically around three. 10 45 AM Eastern on our YouTube channel where we live stream the show and you can talk to us. We'll show off some gadgets. I know Sherilyn has something she wants to show off soon during our Q and A's and it's fun time. We've also got a good group of people here.
So join us. We've got the pixel phones now, Sherilyn. I'm sure [00:01:00] you've been like in editing hell for the past week. Can you broadly tell us, so how do we feel about the, let's focus on the pixel nine right now. How do we feel about the pixel nine?
Cherlynn: The pixel nine, I wasn't expecting it to get a super high score, but Sam, who reviewed the pixel nine for us seems really impressed.
I mean, like Sam likes
Devindra: it. Sam Rutherford, Sam Rutherford
Cherlynn: is our like Android main person. And he is also our foldables person. So, so having him review like the most standard pixel nine, I was just like, it's a, he's going to be bored. Right. I was like, this man's used to his big foldable screens, but Sam really enjoyed the pixel nine and like to contextualize it for everyone.
I went from reading Matt's review first of the pixel nine pro and pro XL. So Matt Smith, our UK bureau chief I went from editing him and then going on to Sam, whose review went up the next day. And again, you, you read the pro review, you're like, of course, it's good. [00:02:00]Of course, everyone liked the pro.
Meta scored the pro
Devindra: very, very high. That is surprising. Well,
Cherlynn: let's get to that. I wanted to talk about that. But you, I mean, you asked to start with the nine. So we'll start with the nine, the basic baby. Well, if you, if
Devindra: you feel more interested in the pro, you can start there. It's up to you.
Cherlynn: We can. I've just started talking about the nine.
Let's finish this thought. So, so after I went from Matt to Sam, I wasn't expecting, I was expecting like, I wish this was the pro, you know, kind of that vibe. I didn't get that. I actually got Sam going At the end, he said truly, if you don't need the Gemini advanced AI, if you don't need like a telephoto, like a dedicated telephoto camera, you may even be very happy with the Pixel 9, which is again, what we always differentiate between the pro and the regular flagships.
Is that it's the
Devindra: iPhone and. iPhone pro situation too, right? Exactly. It's the
Cherlynn: same situation now. So I think it used to be though in previous years that because there was never a smaller pixel pro, it was always like a larger pixel pro is always a [00:03:00] larger phone. We had more reason to recommend. The nine because of size, but now it's no, even if there's like an alternative size in the premium, like premium top end, like sort of a variant, we still are like the nines pretty freaking good.
So I was just surprised by that. Now. Back to your point the more interesting review in my opinion is the, the, the fact that Matt decided to award the Pixel 9 Pro and 9 Pro XL respectively, like really high scores for any, I think even any Android handset ever for us, 94 and 92 is where we landed with the 9 Pro and 9 Pro XL respectively.
And again, to contextualize and give you all like a little bit of behind the scenes. He candidly, he scored them a little bit higher at first. And I was like, Whoa, We're
Devindra: not going to have a 100 out of 100 math. Yeah. I just was
Cherlynn: like, I think we might need to tamper this a little bit. I feel like we're very [00:04:00] excited, but we need to give ourselves some.
Some a a little bit of wiggle room like what are they they're not perfect, right? So I think we tweaked and in the tweaking we tweaked the original scores for both devices both went down a little bit I think if you look at our score for last year's pixel 8 Pro It was 93 and again This is like way too in the weeds and both Matt and I will be like we hate Arguing over one or two points, but here's the reasoning 93 for last year's.
And usually we're like, this is just as good if not better. So maybe we'll go to 93 or 91, but then we brought the pixel nine pro Excel down a point, and that is in part because. Matt still wanted to have a big enough gap between the nine pro and the nine pro XL. And so 93 just was good. Wasn't giving us a lot of room.
And then the other reason is that the nine pro XL actually, even though it has is the same size is screen is 0. 1 inch bigger this year, which like. doesn't sound like much when you're talking about a [00:05:00] frame that's still the same size, but the screen for Matt, who boldly claimed he had larger than average hands or average or whatever, not too small hands.
I don't know what he's telling us there, but he was all like, It was already hard. Be humble brag.
Devindra: Thank you Matt.
Cherlynn: Yeah, it was a very humble brag, but even for Matt, it was like hard to reach the corners. And so with that we were like, alright, it's worth like saying it is unwieldy. It is a more expensive phone than last year.
These AI features don't do enough for us to be like, yeah, it's worth that, that, you know, keeping it same score sort of situation yet so. We brought it down a point, but that's not a bad thing because why? The 9 Pro, holy crap, we it's arguably one of our highest scored phones around 94. So, obviously you've read these reviews, Davindra were you shocked at the scores we gave?
Devindra: I'm really, I was shocked at the score of the 9 Pro. The XL, you know, being a little more unwieldy, I was not surprised there, but, It does seem I don't know, I was talking about this with Sam a little bit too around his review. It is [00:06:00] funny to see Google's journey on like the way it's thinking of Android phones, right?
Cause they launched with. Let's go back in history, right? They launched with the HTC G1, right? And some of the like early Motorola's like stuff from third parties. Then third party started making a lot of garbage and putting a lot of stuff into Android software. So Google was like, okay, okay, hold up.
Let's have these Nexus phones, which are just pure Android, which run all our stuff and doesn't have any of your third party garbage. And at that point. That never, that was never a big seller, right? That was for the fans, the super fans, the people online, the super nerds. Pixel was their attempt to be like, okay, let's screw it.
Let's just go iPhone. And I feel like nine generations in they finally done it. The camera bar has been chopped up. The design looks a little spiffier. I'm not too surprised. I do feel like it seems like Google knocked this one out. So. I was shocked by the score number, but yeah, I feel like Google, it's been a long road for Google to get to this point to make like the [00:07:00] ideal Android phone, I'd say.
Cherlynn: It has. And I, I mean, I don't know if I would call it the ideal Android phone, even if I think it is. It's a very significantly improved device over, let's say the earlier pixels, even though it feels like over the pixel eight, which I also have here, right. And for those of you on the stream, I'm holding up side by side so you can kind of look right.
The design felt nice on the pixel eight pro, you know, the colors, you know, Google's always nailed the color combo. It feels very different this time. I think you've seen all our reviews. I just mentioned this independently, Matt Smith in the UK and Sam in New Jersey were both all this feels like an iPhone.
Matt almost picked it up and was like, this feels like the iPhone. And it looks like an iPhone, and that's not a bad thing, right? Because they still have enough of a distinction, like the camera bar is different enough, there's the G logo I guess. Is that a, that's a, that's a good thing in the sense that it feels premium.
It feels solid. It feels like a good real phone. And I'm sure there are people who won't be happy about that. They're like, you know, don't keep [00:08:00] copying Apple phones are so boring now. They're all the same because don't forget the Samsung S24 series. Also feel like iPhones I've got a Samsung S24 in the hand as well.
And it's they've all become more or less the same. And whether it's a good or bad thing is really up to you to decide. But for Google though, the design. It's a huge step up, right? Like they don't feel the need to differentiate. They don't feel the need to do these like incredibly like slimmy, curvy sides anymore to achieve a slider, slightly thinner profile.
It's, it feels very grown up. And I wrote a blurb for our best smartphones guy about the Pixel 9 Pro saying that this feels like a grown up phone and to Matt's point in his review. a showcase for Gemini AI. And I think that that's what these phones are all about. Pixel phones have always been about the camera, but like these are like camera plus, you know,
Devindra: Are we liking the AI features?
And we should also differentiate between the local stuff, which you don't have to pay for, and then there's the fancier stuff, which comes free with the pro devices for a year, but [00:09:00]you will have to pay for that eventually, at least 20 bucks a month. Is the AI stuff any good?
Cherlynn: I mean, the capability and the like actual good of it.
Like The, the, the, how well it works. Right. Seems like pretty good. I mean, add me, everyone's been having fun with again, independently, both Sam and Matt were like, we use add me to clone ourselves. In the, and add me to be clear is the feature on the camera where you can have. You know, you're taking a group shot and then you can hand, someone takes a photo first and then hand the phone off to someone else.
And then you, the photographer can go and take your place in the picture. And the phone will give some AI guide, AR guidance to show you where to, you know, frame up the shot and to make your, make you in the picture. So that seemed impressive enough and fun enough that they both were like playing around with it.
Because it's only been what, like a week since these phones were launched. It's a not enough time to say how much we'll use this in the real world. Things like the pixel screenshots app. I think there are problems here and there where Sam enjoyed it. Sam really found it useful. Matt had issues with it.
Like he points [00:10:00] out that like you can't. Automatically back up your entire Google photos history on setup. So it'd be like, you will go to, you will have to manually import pictures one by one. And it's just not, yeah, I mean, not, there's nothing wrong with like manually importing pictures and this is a huge privacy thing because some people's yeah,
Devindra: it's definitely a privacy thing.
Cherlynn: Yeah. It's like Google photos. My, mine is like so many years in history and I don't want to give it access to everything at once. So anyway, there's also the pixel studio app, which I think both of Sam and Matt liked because it was fun, but both of them were also like, eh I think this is more of a criticism of image generators like that in general, where like you feed mid journey a prompt and it comes up, how much are you going to use this?
We're not really gonna do that all day. It's not. That much useful. So those are the main AI features. I mean, the rest of the stuff, like your typical Gmail summary things or like your, even Apple [00:11:00] intelligence is trying to do some of these things. I, I didn't get a real big sense that they were that like crazy good.
I mean, Sam mentioned call notes in his piece, but I think none of us have really put it to through the ringer through like really difficult calls to see if it works that way. Through all those situations as well. So,
Devindra: and that's the thing that will summarize your call and give you notes, like the thing in text.
That's cool. Yeah. A
Cherlynn: transcript and a summary, which is cool. I think. Yeah.
Devindra: Okay, cool. So, but I mean, overall I guess any surprises, any, any surprising highlights from the Israelin or any like surprising disappointments.
Cherlynn: Zoom enhance on videos is a weird, like it take, it took them one year to actually bring it out to a device.
Ben: Yes.
Cherlynn: And then the, the fact that it's not on the nine, you have to have a nine pro to use it was what Sam pointed out in the night, which is, you know, I would expect that from Sam, right. Who's used to reviewing pro phones. And then for Matt, I think he, but they both pointed out in low light, Google's cameras still far and away better than the competition.
They both. [00:12:00]meticulously put it through his paces in the camera front. I think we all really enjoy camera testing and it still came up tops, right? Google still came up tops on camera. And Matt, our review almost didn't get up on time because he had to run the battery test for the Pixel Pro XL. Well, the Pro arrived a little later than the Pro XL did so he didn't have as much time, but also the Pro ran for so long.
It lasted 25 hours on our battery test. That's a lot. I mean, the Pro XL got 23 hours thereabouts. Wait, that's already longer. The 25 hour mark is longer than our next closest number, which is the OnePlus 12, I believe. So, all around just incredibly impressive phones. I'm surprised. And I think that that's what's surprising, right?
We're like, whoa, these are good?
Devindra: What? These are good? Well, there were a lot of shocks early on. It's these are stylish? These seem capable and good? I know I think that's going to be a big compelling factor for a lot of people, Shirley. I'm like, Google for a long time has been like, we're making phones for nerds and for people who don't care as much about [00:13:00] Samsung bling and whatever.
And now it's just no, Google's no, we're just, we're just going to do the same thing. We're going to do iPhone type stuff. How does this compare to the current Samsung stuff, Cherlynn?
Cherlynn: I mean, I think Google has the upper hand in AI, for sure, and cameras, so I think that's what I was seeing across the board, that like the S24's cameras were good, but in some situations not as good, although one, in one occasion, like Samsung did better on the Pro XL or something, and then I want to address some of the questions in the chat really quickly, so, MiniMeA1231 asks if we will be comparing the Google AI versus the Apple AI.
Obviously we can't right now because the Apple intelligence stuff isn't out. We could compare Samsung's to your point of interest, Samsung's Galaxy AI to Google's Gemini AI, but like I said, it's just Different applications, different things like Samsung's AI, Galaxy AI feature in the Z Flip 6 and the Z Fold 6, which are its latest to feature like new Galaxy AI features came with you can draw onto a picture and it'll add a cat, you know?
Yeah. That sort of thing to me is really fun, but the actual use of it, IDK, right? Meanwhile, [00:14:00]Google's got no equivalent feature. It's got auto frame and reimagine, and it's got like pixel studio. And so there's no easy way to do an apples to apples comparison. But I also want to address that CUD or CUT who is a familiar name from our chat says that whole add me feature.
Is this something that people want? Because it's a bit weird if it becomes the norm, people would just be adding in all their friends and family and photos when they were never there. Might as well add your cat and dog while you're at it. I don't think you can, after the fact, add people, FYI. So for add me, it's like you're holding up the phone.
And then, for example, I've had family visiting this past couple weeks or so. And if I'm sounding ragged, that's why. And we've been taking like family pictures, right? So it's four of us. And we try not to bother people. So we don't ask them. Stranges also, you don't always feel safe, right when you're on the street and like standing in front of a museum and take a 4, 4, 4 of us please.
Who's to say they won't just run? So I could have my cousin, you know, hold up the phone and take the initial picture while I pose with his mom and dad. And then he comes [00:15:00] into the picture. I hold up the phone and he go, I think if there are a lot of. Specific use cases where it'll be helpful. And I don't think you can add a cat and dog in because you'll never get the cat and dog to stay in the place they need them to.
So CD cut, I am sorry but I don't think you can. And I think I would I could see some use for this add me feature.
Devindra: I'm sure people will figure out ways to hack it, but it does seem from the demos they did. Like it creates like an AR situation of where you are right now. Yeah. If you break that.
Environment like where it is. I don't think you can actually even stitch something into that. I think the bigger issue is just it is weird to have some features locked into just Google's phones when Google is both, you know, a company making phones, but also the company providing the software to everybody else.
This is very much like Inter Explorer on windows, you know, or Apple locking down some features just to its devices. Like it feels if this goes on. People can chat Monopoly or something going on here. Do you feel weird about that, Trillian? Like some of these just being on Google stuff for so far?
Cherlynn: [00:16:00] I, I don't know that they're going to always be that way. I think that like for some things, because Gemini Advanced is something that you can apply for and get with any other. Like phone, right? Like you can apply for and so some of these features might come out to a future android phones or other branded Android phones and then with pixel there have been a few things that have been locked into pixel for a very long time like pixel ui things pixels, call screening pixels like general like call assistance things have been very pixel phone centric and I feel like that's because it's been Built so deeply into the U S as opposed to it's an app, right?
The pixel screenshots at pixel recorder. Those things have eventually opened up to some other maybe Samsung, maybe I don't even think there's other Android players really, but yeah, but Samsung, right. And they work closely enough with Samsung to be like eventually maybe right. Circle to search is a feature that launched first on Samsung, even though it was a Google feature.
So I feel like it's not necessarily super locked in. And even if it were. To answer that part of your question, I don't [00:17:00] know if that is such a huge deal. I think maybe Google does need to keep some of this for itself, right? Like we, we know that Android is supposed to be like the most open ecosystem. It's supposed to be like welcoming and like whatever, but Google at this point needs to be able to play the game the way Samsung, Apple.
Especially Apple. Does it? Does it though?
Devindra: It's, it's inherently unfair to be both the software vendor doing it and also be like, oh, also, hey partners, we're also going to directly compete with you in hardware and also keep features to ourselves that you can never touch. Like that, that is where anti competitive stuff like starts to arise, I guess, yeah.
I
Cherlynn: mean, I think Google has its feet and toes in so many things that like it's anti competitive in a lot of other areas. But I think on the pixel front, like it's generally been trying to bring pixel first or pixel only features to more devices. But then you know, when you said the whole like, Oh, you're talking about the software and the hardware.
I was like at first really readying to reply being like, Apple does that. But then you were saying that it's not fair because Google competes with its own customers. So I get [00:18:00]that. I don't know. I don't know that I don't know how they're going about it, really.
Devindra: The US government has declared them a monopoly.
Yep. Right. Or at least the US judge has. Anti trust. Anti trust. So search there. They are a search monopoly. Android is such a open ecosystem that everybody supports. I just feel like Google is going to start to be worried about this because we already talked about the potential repercussions from the search monopoly thing, like could, could be like, Hey, maybe you should split up a little bit.
Maybe we should take out some of these parts of Google and make them separate companies. I wonder if. The company itself is a little afraid of that because it's not just Oh, we're going to slap a five or 10 million fine on you, which is like the money Google, you know, that it's in their couch cushions.
It's like more serious things could happen.
Cherlynn: Can I quickly go back to the chat for specific to pixel questions to the pixel nine, I mean, so, has Sam. Maybe Sam in an alternate timeline is would love to hear about the heat management of the Tensor four. And this is something that did come up in our pixel nine Pro review.
So Matt noticed that the Tensor G four actually runs a [00:19:00] lot cooler than older pixel phone. So sorry. It's very weird to be like the Tenser G four runs cooler than the Pixel eight Pro because like, where else is the Tenser G three? The Tenser G three gonna be obviously the Pixel eight Pro. But I think it's important to focus on the phone than just the chip because even though the chip does supposedly run cooler, it's also the fact that like to depro9's point in the chat, Pixel 9 series has a better like thermal dissipation system, so like it's a lot cooler.
I did notice that yes, the Pixel 8 Pro that I was using would run really hot. I haven't, I think, pushed the 9 Pro XL enough to feel like it would in, you know, You know, that circumstance otherwise be hot but I've never felt it run hot. Right. So like to that point, it certainly seems to run cooler.
And Matt definitely pushed it harder in his review and was like, it was cooler. So, has Sam, I hope that answers your question. And I mean, But I think the fact that the phone's a little bit thicker of a, of a profile is partly because it needed to build in some sort of like better cooling [00:20:00] system.
Gotcha.
Devindra: Gotcha. Okay. Well, any other thoughts on these things? I would want to point people to our reviews, go check them out on the site.
Cherlynn: Go check out our site. Pixel 9 Pro reviews been up since yesterday and our Pixel 9 reviews up today. The on sale date for that series of phones is up today. And then we have so many other Pixel devices coming in.
Send me your questions about them. I'm like. What do you want to know most about the 9 Pro Full, the Pixel Watch 3, and the Pixel Buds Pro 2? Last week also on Saturday I did a quick Engadget review recap, and I will be doing one of these for the Pixel, all the Pixel products at some point.
So, again, I really want to know your thoughts on the upcoming devices before we review them so that I can go into them looking for those questions. So send them our way, podcast. engadget. com. You can always email me. C H E R at Engadget. com as well.
Devindra: Let's move on to some news from Gamescom 2024, which is happening right now [00:21:00] in Cologne, Germany. We are not there in person, I believe, but we're covering a lot of news from the event. And some highlights here and joining us for this discussion is our podcast producer, Ben Ellman. Hey, Ben.
Ben: Cause when we're talking about video games, it's Ben time.
Devindra: It's Ben time. And we don't, we don't want to break Sherilyn's brain with some of this game stuff, because I'm sure Sherilyn does not care about the Indiana Jones game coming to Xbox. I don't know. Do you, Sherilyn?
Cherlynn: I have heard that young Indiana Jones.
Devindra: What?
Cherlynn: Who, who, who was the actor? Shit. You
Ben: mean Shia LaBeouf?
You mean River Phoenix? No, no, no, no.
Cherlynn: Young, what's his face? Young crap. This older man.
Devindra: Okay, this is why, young Harrison Ford?
Cherlynn: Harrison Ford! Young Harrison Ford! This is why Ben is on this segment. This
Devindra: is why Ben is helping us out. Anyway, I've
Cherlynn: heard that young Harrison Ford is hot. Anyway, that's all.
That's all. Go for it. It
Devindra: doesn't, but it doesn't look like Harrison Ford. It's it's a totally different I
Cherlynn: know I'm just saying that when I hear Indiana Jones, I think okay So Shulman
Devindra: is talking about the CG version of young Harrison Ford. No, I've been [00:22:00] sent
Cherlynn: pictures of him on his heyday
Devindra: AI okay. Well, yes, he was hot.
Yes, but also in the most recent movie they use AI to de age him Yeah, you get a glimpse of that that old hot Harrison Ford face anyway We're talking about the game here. This game is one of the like rare exclusives that Microsoft has. And there was a lot of talk about this thing. This is Indiana Jones and the great circle.
It's coming from it's developed by Xbox subsidiary machine games. I believe. It, this came as part of the the whole ZeniMax acquisition. So when Microsoft bought id Software, Arcane, Bethesda machine games came alongside that. And I believe there was a deal to get this game to Sony's eventually.
So here's what we learned is that this game is coming to Xbox and PC on December 9th. It's coming to the PlayStation 5. A couple of months later in spring 2025 and the nerds, especially the Microsoft nerds, the Xbox fans have gone a little crazy because they're like our exclusive. What's happening now?
Do you have thoughts about this [00:23:00]Trillian or Ben?
Ben: This is Microsoft admitting that not very many people have Xboxes and they don't want this to just be a PC game.
Devindra: Microsoft is a business and they like to sell games and unfortunately their hardware. Has not done a good job of that. So I think that's the basic thing here.
Does this feel odd to you, Sherilyn? Or is this just like weird fanboy inviting at this point?
Cherlynn: I always think of it as strange fanboy infighting because I don't pay attention as much to this news. Doesn't really matter to me.
Devindra: It's funny, like, when you tune what are the gamers up to? They're mad about Indiana Jones.
They're mad about this lady character starring in a game. The gamers are not okay. Yeah.
Cherlynn: Every now and then there's this big Controversy in gaming, right? Oh, well, what trans characters, sexism, violence. There's always kind of up, you know, like public outcry over a lot of these things. I think I'm more concerned when it's like when blizzard Activision and all, they have all that stuff, right?
Sexism at the workplace, toxic environment, like that sort of we'll talk
Devindra: about that [00:24:00] soon. Even more harm. Yeah, so we'll get to that. Don't worry. We've got that. So anyway,
Cherlynn: I was looking forward to it. Awesome.
Devindra: There is news here.
Ben: Okay. So Devindra, one of my big questions was, you know, as I was watching the trailer for this game and reading Jess's first look,
Devindra: the game, which looks sick as hell, by the way, I do think this game looks fantastic.
Ben: Yeah. So I was wondering, okay, with the Uncharted series and everything, like why isn't this a third person game? But then after watching the trailer, I realized, okay, I think they want to make it really visceral. There's a lot of hand to hand combat in this game. They want to make it feel like the movies did.
The fight choreography in the Indiana Jones movies back then, just fight choreography overall, was okay. It was fine. Yeah. And Indiana Jones was never known for huge martial arts maneuvers like Batman or anything. Oh no, he's known for shooting the guy swinging the sword. Yeah, exactly. So you can't really have an Arkham Asylum, you [00:25:00]know, third person style Indiana Jones game where Indy is like breaking a Nazi's back over his knee.
Devindra: They, they could have done some, I, I honestly prefer third person, like angles, like games too. Cause I like to see my characters when I'm running around, but I think that mostly this comes from machine games, right? And machine games, they did those the Wolfenstein the most recent, like Wolfenstein games, which are fantastic and good.
And also I did not really care to play like a modern Wolfenstein shooter, but they did great stuff when it came to like environmental storytelling, good writing. They, they did some interesting stuff with first person shooters. So I think it's just a, an interesting choice to do this. I think the camera pans out sometimes.
So you do see the character and in cut scenes, you see him too. We'll, we'll see how this goes. Go read Jess's, Jess Condit's hands on with this thing. The title is Indiana Jones and the Great Circle has a Nazi slapping mechanic and gotta love it to see gotta love it Shout out to this game for doing that.
Also in Microsoft news, there's a couple assistive tech things that they announced. [00:26:00] There's a new Xbox adaptive joystick, which is a single stick type of thing, which looks like, honestly, it looks a lot like a VR controller, like something with the Oculus Headset or something, but you can plug this into an existing xbox controller the adaptive controller and gives you a bunch of controls They can handle with just one hand let me see here.
There are also some 3d printable files for Adaptex thumbstick toppers so you can download these files. They're free. You have to get access to the 3d printer Talk to your local library because often they will have some of these devices. But you can print out these things to get like better grips on your phone too, for people who have trouble with with, you know, very typical gripping.
There's also this cool thing. Let me see here in partnership with 8BitDo that. Controller company. There's the light S E 2. 4 G wireless controller, which is a game pad with all the inputs on the top has low resistance buttons and Hall effect joysticks also has those like giant eight, but do the super buttons that they put on their mechanical keyboards.
Just like a big ass button [00:27:00]you can hit. And I guess program things too. So a lot of interesting options here too. I'm seeing CUD in the chat
Ben: saying that it looks like a Wii nunchuck. That is not wrong. It
Devindra: is not wrong, but more specifically, if Microsoft were to be like, Hey, maybe we should do a VR headset or something.
This kind of looks like what a VR control looks like, maybe without the motion controls. So that is cool. Also, also the all digital Xbox series X, which we thought was kind of a joke when Microsoft announced it a couple of months ago, you can pre order that now it's 450. It's going to be coming to the U S on October 15th.
It's only 50 cheaper than the disc version, that disc version, which by the way, often goes on sale for 400. sometimes even less. So I'm still a little baffled by this thing. I'm even more baffled by the 600 special edition, which has a two terabyte drive and the disk drive, but it's 600. I don't, I don't know.
And we were just talking
Ben: about how Xbox is Only doing okay. They're only doing so
Devindra: rather than lowering the prices [00:28:00] to ship more boxes or I don't know, man, people like us. We'd rather sell more games through Sony than make our boxes cheaper. So a really interesting calculation Microsoft is making there.
Did you ever decide on the next box? Did you ever get the series S? Cause we've talked about that for a couple of years.
Cherlynn: Never, baby, never get a PS five pro or whatever.
Devindra: That was a good time to avoid that but I don't know more steam deck stuff for you or those PC handhelds I know you've been playing around with yeah I
Ben: think that actually the PC handhelds are probably the best option for Cherlynn
Devindra: as they get smaller too because they're still big and yes
Cherlynn: smaller is better.
They're a bit big and heavy right now I mean I played a lot with the I think I knew, I mean, I played a little bit with the steam duck. And my switch is still a beautiful ornament. You can,
Devindra: you can honestly play most of the like good indie games right now on switch. So you're not missing out
Cherlynn: pretty old switch.
Got it like right before the pandemic. So, but
Devindra: you probably had the updated battery at least if that was 20, better battery
Cherlynn: for sure. [00:29:00] I had that. I mean, I think I'm interested in these games, I like the handheld games, but like my, I don't know, my habits have changed so much over the last few years, it's oh, I got into crocheting a lot, and now I just sit around drawing.
Devindra: You got into Vampire Survivors on your phone, right? And that made you a little crazy, so I think you can do that on Switch.
Cherlynn: I am a beast at vampire survivors. I don't know what y'all talking about. I'm a gamer.
Ben: Borderlands
Devindra: 4 is coming, which feels like a threat. Gearbox and 2k games announced it's coming in 2025, which I think the impact of this announcement would have been maybe they were planning for the movie to go a little better.
Maybe they were being like, oh, yeah, people are hyped for Borderlands right now. Let's announce our next game no, everybody hates the Borderlands movie. I called it a disaster. It is it's a huge mess So I don't know who's excited for this thing But hopefully it's better than Borderlands 3 which I recall being a little disappointing
Ben: In retrospect Could we have said that the Borderlands, we knew that the Borderlands movie was not going to be that great when we saw that Kevin Hart was cast in it?[00:30:00]
Devindra: He's not the problem. He's not the problem in that movie. The problem is that you know, the script is bad. A lot of things are bad in that movie.
Ben: So talking specifically about Borderlands 4, I just wish that I had more of a squad to play it with, because I have been playing 2. I got those on sale as part of a, kind of like, buy the whole collection deal a couple of years ago.
And I was having a good time playing it by myself, but I was like, eh, I feel like I need more people. And, like, when I started playing this was a time Kind of like I had taken a sabbatical from like online kind of squad based games. And now that I have been playing Helldivers so much, I've got like 125 hours in on there.
God damn it. Yeah. Now I'm thinking, okay, yeah. I really want to find a squad of people to do other like squad based games with.
Devindra: I mean, you've got a lot of options, Sam. You've got all the, all the other sorts of what Valorant? And whatnot. So I don't know. There's so many squad based games [00:31:00] right now.
This is I do wonder wouldn't the actual like evolution of Borderlands be like, let's do a destiny type of thing where you're actually going on, you know, multiplayer missions and stuff with people. I think, cause you could do co op play and just dick around in Borderlands, but it was never as robust as something like destiny.
So I don't know. That could be the thing. Did you see the story, Ben and Cherlynn about the NVIDIA ACE virtual humans? I got a lot
Ben: to say about this, but go on. A lot to
Devindra: say. These are, these are, so last year, I believe, NVIDIA showed off, it's an avatar cloud engine technology, Ace technology that's powering characters in some games.
So basically, creating NPCs that will react to you the way like ChatGPT does, so that they would speak if to you If you ask them a question or if you choose a certain prompt or something, they could react to what you're saying, or maybe react to your clothing, but also their model will like, look like it's talking properly.
They will have a semi AI conversation. A lot of people were criticizing this as a way to be like so you, this means you're not, you don't need as many [00:32:00] writers, right? This means you could just populate your games with this weird. AI spouting avatars and not actually write dialogue for them or storylines or anything.
That's the controversy. The news is that it's actually coming to a multiplayer mecha game called Mecha Break. I've not heard too much about this game, but it is actually happening. It's, it's totally real. What did you think about this news Ben?
Ben: I watched the video where, you know, you're basically in kind of like a cyberpunk esque world and like you're going into a sushi shop and you're talking with the like sushi shop owner.
And I think it's cool that you can use your voice to interact with this AI character. I think that that's a really cool feature. cool like method of input and something that's probably going to pop up in a lot more games. But, when the character started talking, it felt very wooden. It felt like you were talking to a robot.
The voice didn't have very much color to it. And [00:33:00] hey, I'm a voice guy, so. Oh you can tell. Really? Yeah, I really want that to feel more alive. And so I was thinking, how would we end up using this technology? Because I think that it could be useful in some cases, but definitely not as the main player character.
Definitely not. As you know, the next rung of NPCs. Yeah, these are like NPCs in weird
Devindra: submissions off at the end of the map or something. Yeah, should
Ben: probably like the most important, you know, five or so NPCs should probably still be written and acted. But. Where this could end up being really useful is if you have a big open world game I'm thinking about like Assassin's Creed or something where you're like always Running through these like crowded marketplaces or something and you just hear people like yelling things That if you have a couple of [00:34:00] people doing background editing Acting like lines and then the rest of it generated by NVIDIA ACE, then that could be a good way of stretching your budget a little bit further and making the overall world feel a bit more alive.
Devindra: Yeah. Yeah. You are absolutely right, Ben. That's I'm sure what they're all thinking. I hate that idea because especially like when I was playing the latest, like Assassin's Creed game, which is set way back in I don't know, it's, it's in the Middle East thousands of years ago and walking through the towns, like walking through the villages and seeing the way they constructed it and seeing like people interact with dialogue that has been recorded by humans and written by humans.
Like it felt so alive. I was kind of astounded by that. And if you replace that ambience with, with AI stuff, you know, like that's that to me will kill the realism of the game. And I'll just feel like I'm, Oh, I'm just walking through the simulation right now. I'm not walking through ancient Baghdad or anything.
Right. It's I feel like that'll kill [00:35:00]it more. So I'm sure you all have thoughts podcasting gadget. com. Listen to what you think about this. I'm not a huge fan. Not a huge fan of yeah. I just hope it
Ben: doesn't kill the art of the like, little in joke kind of world building thing. One of my favorites from Mass Effect was, there was that one race of aliens that felt like it needed to, or in order to communicate with other species, it needed to preface the emotion that it was putting into its sentence.
It had to like,
Devindra: yeah, say it in words. It's amazing. I love it.
Ben: Yeah. Like, when you're in an elevator or something, there's a little ad for a all that alien species production of Hamlet or something. So it's that's very funny, and if we lost that, I would feel like we're losing so much from I don't know, quirky little world building things in video games.
Devindra: Quirky little things? I mean, that's just good writing. That's human ingenuity and creativity. There is maybe something interesting that will happen with Hey, [00:36:00] emergent AI is avatars. That is we love like game systems. You see what people do with the, just the systems in breath of the wild and tears of the kingdom, or think back to far cry two, where people are just like having a lot of fun with the rules and the mechanics of that world.
I'm sure it's going to lead to some of that stuff. I'm just worried that. Some of these companies will over rely on all of it. Let's move on to Black Myth Wukong though, which is a game that is totally killing it. Cherlynn, I feel like this may be up your alley too, because this is a journey to the West game, basically.
It's sort of like an adaptation. I mean, I
Cherlynn: love the idea. Is it a fighting game? Do you like fight? It
Devindra: is very much, it's like a Dark Souls game. It's like God of War meets God of Dark Souls. Okay, but it isn't actually a Souls like game. That's the thing. It looks like a Souls like game, but it isn't. It has the mechanics.
It has the healing. It has the crazy ass bosses. What I'm saying is it is very much God of War, the sort of like adventuring around, not as open as like the way Elden Ring was, but very like in specific spaces. It feels like Dark Souls. It feels like [00:37:00]actually playing early Dark Souls, but also with the big ass bosses from Elden Ring and even God of War, the newer games ended up doing a lot of that.
So that's what this game is.
Ben: In trying to get myself up to speed on this game, I was watching a lot of videos, watching some streamers and stuff. And the thing that I saw first from so many of the YouTube videos is saying that this isn't a Souls like game. And then when I watched actual gameplay, it showed, you know, big bosses, like when you hit a boss or when you hit one of these like larger enemies, all you're doing is chip damage.
And like the fights are pretty long, which makes me feel like it is kind of more Souls like than not. I
Devindra: don't
Ben: understand.
Devindra: It is more Souls like than it isn't. I think some people are being weird and precious because gamers are weird. But no, you have to walk around and light like lanterns. And this is where you respond.
When you die. The big thing is you don't lose all your stuff. You don't lose all your experience in your items when you die. So you can just go back and keep hammering at a boss, which is something you cannot do in souls game very [00:38:00] easily. I guess it's more like when you're exploring somewhere and you die from some stupid enemy and you lose like a lot of good experience.
That's the stuff that breaks my heart. That just doesn't happen in this game. You can explore and do whatever. Anyway, the news is that it was released this week and it broke Steam's concurrent single player record launch within hours of its launch. So that is an insane thing for, for it to happen.
I think the numbers we saw.
Ben: Not so much of an asterisk though, the concurrent players, so many of them were in China. This is
Cherlynn: people being really
Ben: enthusiastic. Ask Nick about it in China and then a small minority of people single digit percentage of people in the US were playing this game.
Cherlynn: What's up, and they were all Chinese to
Chinese people in Asia in America. No, I I mean, I, I'm not surprised by the numbers. I think the Wukong title is interesting. Like I wanted to ask you about you know, cause y'all both delve into the similarities to dark souls and talk about the mechanics a [00:39:00]lot and the like components of the story, but I'm like, are the story characters.
I like from grow growing up. Are they there? You know, are does the monkey king fall in love with the spider demon? Does like the sea I I've bring around get tighter. I've, I know. So that's, that's what I would be curious to see if they've like faithfully adapted the sort of story. Things that me, and I'm sure those concurrent streamers who are hugely Chinese are looking for, that's the sort of like vibe we're looking for.
Maybe
Devindra: you, you plays the monkey king, so I'll give you that. You got the staff, you got the, the cloud. He flies on. What is funny though is that I started watching OG Dragon Ball with my daughter and she's very much into original Dragon Ball. I'm like, look Monkey King, there's the staff, there's this clown, he's here.
Tail. So here's my thing too.
Cherlynn: There have been a lot of not that, I'm not talking about specifically Dragon Ball, but there have been like a lot of other adaptations, maybe even western adaptations of the Monkey King story that don't feel as faithful. I remember Monkey King appearing somewhere as a playable character or like in some other smaller movie type thing as [00:40:00] a baddie or something, right?
And I'm just like, that's not what the Monkey King story is. It's a story about redemption. It's
Devindra: about redemption, yeah. And the wily monkey. Anyway! I just want to point out that that crazy numbers from the game, what we were seeing is 88 percent of the players were in China. So U. S. was in
Cherlynn: America. What a nice coincidence.
We love the number 8. Yeah,
Devindra: I was wondering
Ben: about that. Very lucky. How is it that it was 88%? Very lucky. That just seems like the books were cooked up. We gamed
Cherlynn: it, y'all. That's all.
Ben: Let's be clear. I am not accusing them of cooking the books on this, but it just seems like a
Devindra: really interesting coincidence.
Well, let me put the context down here. So this is essentially China's first triple A game. The first game that is on the level of something like God of War. So, yeah. I'm pretty sure if if the government was
Cherlynn: probably well adapted. Yeah.
Devindra: If also, but if the government was like, we really gotta get the numbers on this game, like what
Cherlynn: can we just turn on everyone's gaming consoles, [00:41:00]those
Devindra: consoles that are turned off because of gaming lockdown time you know, the government's yes, please, please.
All you got all get free copies of the game. I don't know. No, no, we don't know. If they do that, they were like,
Cherlynn: we're good. We're done.
Devindra: I think. A lot of people in China definitely want to play this game. I'm playing through it right now. A couple of things worth mentioning because the developer game science was like in the news too, because apparently.
There was a document that went out to some streamers, or not streamers, but people who were got the first
Ben: look at the game or something.
Devindra: The people who were covering the game, mainly in China, but apparently this went out to other countries, like a couple of other European countries too there was a list of forbidden subjects in their review agreement, which include, do not mention politics.
Do not mention. Feminist propaganda. Do not mention COVID 19 or China's video game industry policies, the stuff we're talking about right now and other content that instigates negative discourse also believe like violence was one thing, even though this is a game about the monkey king, [00:42:00] like bashing giant gods in, in their heads with his stick.
Just kind of funny. There is that whole thing. Game science did not respond to an email. I'm looking at the New York times reporting here. But this is not too surprising. Right. Cause we, we deal with all sorts of limitations when it comes to when we cover games, it's mainly just like it's embargo Hey, please don't spoil all the storylines.
It's just like a, an agreement to not spoil all the big surprises in the game, please. An embargo is okay, everyone is going to try to. Publish it this time or sometime after that's like the general agreement. We'll go to but certainly not content of our reviews Not like avoiding certain topics yeah,
Ben: also the leader of game science has I don't know.
He's just a poster like imagine This most whacked out stuff that Elon Musk has been posting about recently. This comes back to the idea of, are gamers okay? Gamers are not
Devindra: okay. I don't even
Ben: want to mention it. It's just kind of nasty fratty [00:43:00]culture. You know, in a Chinese design studio.
Which makes me think, oh man, are all gamers the same? That's kind of sad. I think a lot, it's
Devindra: in, it's in, Especially if you use it mostly consists of dudes and industry that is very dude heavy like unfortunately it leans to that There is a great reporting over at IGN last year It's called how black myth Wukong developers history of sexism is complicating its journey to the West Written by Rebecca Valentine and Kihun Chan This is a good piece Worth worth reading because yeah, essentially the culture of the studio does not seem great.
It seems very, very fratty, very much like a boys club. I will tell you all this I'm 10 hours into this game and now I do feel guilty about like playing it because I did not realize how fully shitty they were. Yeah. But Not a single woman, 10 hours of me playing this game, talking to other creatures, talking to gods, talking to you know, other people I'm fighting or people like living on the mountain, not a single [00:44:00]female character.
So Laura question for sure.
Cherlynn: I'm sure that's what you're about to ask Ben, which is, let me just tell you, the story itself is heavily male dominant, right? It, the story of the journey to the West is this monkey King, this monk, and like his three disciples, including the monkey King. So there's a pig boy
Ben: and,
Cherlynn: Tang San Zhang is the monk.
And then he has Dude with the burly facial hair, that's one of his disciples. And then the Monkey King is like the second disciple, right? Or the third. And along the way, they go all the way to the west to retrieve something. I forget what. The key, the key point of the whole entire story and I forget.
But! Along the way they encounter demons and you know things that are meant to like they want to eat the monk's flesh Basically because it will give them immortality or something and they're demons and they're lesser beings in the lore, right? so two of the demons that they encounter or three the spider demon and The nine tailed fox or the fox demon or whatever.
These are both [00:45:00] women I haven't encountered these characters
Devindra: yet, so I don't know. So
Cherlynn: probably you have encountered them because they might be like bigger, like enemies to fight. But I also will point out that in the historic telling of the story, that these two are known to seduce the, the monkey king and the, the monk, their attempt to, and it's very sexualized that way.
And also it. into like slang. I wouldn't say slang, but like the vernacular where in Mandarin, the words spider demon or fox demon mean women who are like, I don't want to use the S word, but you know what I mean? Like they're a little promiscuous or they're a little, More out there, right? So you're saying like the story itself is
Devindra: like inherently sexist too?
Yes. Yeah. I am not surprised. Not at all surprised. But it does seem like the game is reflecting that. Listen I think a modern developer could be like, well, screw that, right? Like we could, we could change things up because we are retelling the story. Could be.
Cherlynn: It would have been so cool.
Devindra: Would it be so cool?
But it is
Cherlynn: also China.
Devindra: It is also China. Where like you
Cherlynn: mentioned those stipulations and in media and [00:46:00]in entertainment, they're very careful about the messaging, which is why I was like nodding along when you said those things that they've stipulated because it tracks.
Devindra: It tracks. Anyway game is okay so far.
Like I'm, I'm enjoying at least, but it does suck that this company has a history of this. I feel like this is like something, if they cared, if they cared at all, Just the thing they could have noted, but no, it doesn't seem like they're, they care at all. Also rewatching original Dragon Ball you learn pretty much like Bulma is the goat, but nothing would happen in Goku's story without Bulma.
So shout out to Bulma. My daughter, Sophia loves Bulma. She's Bulma has all these like capsules. She's got all these vehicles. She's cool. Bulma is super cool. Shout out to Bulma. Okay. So that's Gamescom. Go take a look at all of our coverage from that event. And and if you're playing Black Myth Wukong, let me know what you think.
Let's move on to some other news real quick. A couple of things I wanted to shout out. I wrote up something that is so deeply nerdy, but I'm very proud that we put it [00:47:00] on the site because this is, this isn't gadget. Okay, X mems, the company that Billy Steele has written about, which has produced solid state solid state drivers for earbuds and things like that.
So not like traditional speakers with the coil and the magnet, all that stuff, solid state silicon that can, that can work as your earbud driver. This company. He has used that same technology to produce a one millimeter tall fan on a chip. So this is one millimeter tall, essentially a chip that can work as a fan.
It's using ultrasonics to move air around within it. So
Ben: that's really interesting. It's really cool.
Cherlynn: Crazy. So the
Ben: whole idea is I was wondering like, where are the moving parts? Where are the fan blade? Really, really tiny ultrasonics,
Devindra: Ben ultrasonics. So anyway, this company and they're using MEMS.
technology, which is micro electromechanical systems technology. That is essentially like really, really, really small machinery, but in this case with no moving parts but essentially like you could put one or two or a [00:48:00] couple of these fans inside a future smartphone, inside a tablet, inside a device like the Mac book air M two, which died on me at Apple's campus because I was working in the sun and that computer has no fan.
So when you have no fan. You're the heat from all your work is just kind of trapped in there. So I just think this is really cool. This is something that could end up being in devices in the future. Could really change the way like ultra thin devices are made. If the rumors about Apple wanting to do that crazy ultra thin iPhone are true, like maybe we've got to get some airflow in that.
And I just think that idea. Is, is, just think it's neat. What do you guys, what do you guys think?
Ben: I really hope that this doesn't drive dogs crazy.
Devindra: It's
Ben: they say it's silent, but yeah. Ultrasonic, yeah. So it has to be like way outside of the hearing range of any creature, hopefully.
Devindra: It could. Cherlynn, thoughts?
Cherlynn: I mean, I think the technology, the idea itself is really cool. I think Fan on a chip, like just that alone. Like we were all like, Devon, you got to look at this one. And then you were like, [00:49:00] yeah, it's just I think we all nerded out like a group as a group nerded out about this. Good
Devindra: nerd stuff.
Do you want to point out there is like a competing product for, I hate saying it out loud, for they are producing the air jets mini, which I believe the verge and other sites have have covered and forest thing is 2. 5 millimeters to 2. 8 millimeters thick. So, you know. A couple, couple millimeters taller and it also looks like a bigger package in this thing.
Like the thing about XMEMS technology, it looks like a tiny little chip, so it could easily go inside your iPhone where there's this little space on real estate. It's the sort of thing you could put it right on the GPU, right on the APU. Looks cool, could change the way our devices are designed. So check out my coverage of the XMEMS chip.
We wrote a story in San Francisco. Real quick is aiming to take down AI undressing websites and a new lawsuit. This is just good news because the fact that there is a prevalence of these apps both on the web and an app source is absolutely disgusting. And we are like fully unequipped to deal with them right now.
So, it's, it's a good thing. [00:50:00]Hopefully we see more of this on a federal level too, not just a San Francisco. And something I wanted to ask Cherlynnn, because we saw this news drop Chick fil A. The chicken sandwich place is launching a streaming service for reality TV and tone programming. What do you think of Chick fil A's streaming service?
Cherlynn: Okay, first of all,
Devindra: you should have
Cherlynn: paid better attention to our show notes. Yes, you should. Or not.
Ben: No, that's actually, no, that's actually great. Yeah. That's really funny that you weren't aware of this because now we're getting your real reaction. Yeah,
Devindra: what are your first impressions on this news? What?
This is weird.
Ben: Why? What are
Cherlynn: they going to show me? It feels to me like these
Ben: executives are like channeling an idea, like they they took out a Ouija board, but instead of communicating with spirits, they're communicating with the spirit of 2015, and they're like, okay, what is the best business logic for growing our National [00:51:00] company.
Let's just do a streaming service because streaming services are really hot, right? No, dude they're all consolidating because Piper has asked to be paid in terms of streaming
Cherlynn: There's a paradise in the chest. Are the cows the pigs? Producers cut a CD is like chicken dating show. I'm sorry if this is the actual content we're expecting.
Hell yes. I mean,
Ben: has like puppy football. Like we, we have a lot of love Island. It could be love pasture.
Cherlynn: Listen, listen, if they do like chicken farm content and then they slaughter the chickens and fry them, I think that is kind of concerning, but I will also say that have they, have y'all seen the KFC like Hallmark movie?
Devindra: I've not seen it. I know it exists.
Cherlynn: Oh my god, where Mario Lopez plays Colonel Sanders, and then he falls in love with a woman. I think maybe that
Devindra: was their inspiration. We gotta, we gotta out chicken KFC. We gotta, we gotta do something here. It was so good.
Cherlynn: I'm sorry if I've gone ultrasonic. I'm feeling [00:52:00]pitched.
I think Chick fil A
Devindra: is flying too close to the sun. I think that's what it is. They are doing really well. It's got all this money. You can do all this stuff. Also,
Ben: Chick fil A is notorious for you know, did a cow write this sign? It's like E E T, more chicken. Yeah. Like, all spelled wrong. It's quite funny.
So I can only imagine what the closed captions would look like. Oh, man. But also,
Devindra: Chick fil A is notoriously a a very religious, religiously leading company. Yes, that's what I was thinking, too. Again, the Hallmark movie may actually
Ben: be a good,
Cherlynn: Maybe.
Ben: Yeah. No, that's what I was thinking about. It could be kind of like Hallmark or it could be like, what if we had our own Hallmark?
Yeah. Yeah.
Cherlynn: Right. But what if they bought farmers only, which I don't know if y'all know is like a farmer's only dating website.
Devindra: Yeah.
Cherlynn: And then they were like chicken farmers only. And then they put them on a show.
Devindra: Okay. So we had funny news. How about some WTF news? Because this is a crazy story and I'm just bringing it up because it is fricking wild.
It's also basically the plot of industry season three British [00:53:00] billionaire, Mike Lynch was recently found dead after his yacht sank several days ago, or it may have been a week ago at this point. I'm mentioning this. Because this guy is involved in a lot of shady stuff. Like back when I was covering HP stuff he was the CEO of autonomy and HP bought that for 11 billion and not too long after HP was like, Oh crap, we made a huge mistake, 8.
8 billion right down. Just for buying autonomy. He and his former VP of finance were basically I believe San Francisco was charging them for a while. They were recently acquitted in June on he was acquitted on 15 counts of fraud. This is a guy was just a bonkers bonkers life. So he disappeared from his boat now proven to be dead.
We think, oh, this is a kind of a weird story, right? His former VP of finance, Stephen Chamberlain. Died mysteriously this week after being hit by a car.
Cherlynn: Extremely mysterious. Extremely.
Devindra: Extremely like bank who's very [00:54:00] pissed off about the billions of dollars that they probably lost because of your deal or your business practices.
Extremely Oh, you just, we're going to make you go bye bye now. Anyway, that is purely conjecture, purely conspiracy theory.
Ben: Yeah. Remember that episode of breaking bad where they coordinated a hit. On five different possible witnesses in different prisons all in the same five minutes.
Devindra: Yeah, I mean, it's just, it is wild.
There are some things that happen in real life that is totally freaky. I don't know, there are reports about what like ExxonMobil does to reporters. Like when they co cover oil fields or stuff somewhere. Reporters have said my hotel reservation was cancelled. Things are just really weird, like weird shit that these companies have the power to do folks.
Like we see stories about the mobs and stuff, but don't forget who has all the money and all the power. Just dropping that weird story right there. Anyway, watch Industry if you want another angle or another type of story like this. Cherlynn, again, you should watch that show. [00:55:00] I think you'd enjoy it.
Cherlynn: I just want to point out that Davindra, I, I, you know me, I like to re watch Schitt's Creek until the day I die before I like even start a new show, so.
Devindra: Well, it's more you want some nice drama, nice steamy drama in your life. When I do
Cherlynn: want some nice Non-science fiction, drama, non-science fiction drama
Devindra: with like human characters who have flaws, who are very ambitious. Like I think you would does
Cherlynn: it sound like this? Mm-Hmm. other show.
This succession. It's
Devindra: very, in fact, I wrote a whole piece about that Sherly. So you should go, you should go read that review. I know. Flying Lotus. The artist, one of my favorite artists, has confirmed that he composed two Apple ringtones, Daybreak and Chalet, which have been on iPhones since 2019. So I'm just, that's cool.
It's cool to me. Is it cool to you, Ben? Must've
Ben: been a nice bag. Must've been a really nice bag. And this is also has a, podcast connection because the podcast 20, 000 Hertz, which is a podcast all about sound design. So they were doing a little series called The Sound of Apple [00:56:00] and they talked about it.
And so now Flying Lotus was like, okay, I didn't just ghost produce these. I can say, yes, I produced these two ringtones and I'll drop these two ringtones in on the audio version. So here's Daybreak.
And here's Chalet.
Devindra: I, I've switched back to daybreak, but they have the same layers and vibes of flying Lotus's stuff. So I'm like, okay, we should have sure. Probably told that this is the rumors about Michael Jackson working on the Sonic three soundtrack. [00:57:00] This is like that level of geek and artistry kind of, combining, which I don't think was ever fully confirmed.
Like maybe he did some consulting or something, but that soundtrack did slap. So there's that. Let's move on to some pop culture pics for the week. What do you got? Show one.
Cherlynn: So I, when I thought I had pop culture pics this week, I realized I might've already shared it with the, the, this podcast, but no, but, but, but, but, but just reminder that I still watch scary interesting till I die because it's hilarious.
I mean, hilariously morbid it's just hilarious that I listened to those stories. If people getting stuck in caves and underwater diving accidents. Why would you do this to yourself? Okay. Because I enjoy it somehow. But so I think I have mentioned this right on the podcast. I think Ben or Dove, you might remember scary, interesting, cave exploring gone wrong. Anyway. So instead of that sort of pop culture pick, I'm going to give y'all a different one, which is I recently discovered because it's surfaced on my app, YouTube has these games. Now, have y'all, have y'all seen these? I don't know. Maybe I'm aware
Devindra: that they're game.
Cherlynn: Yeah. So it's not like new information.
It's not brand new [00:58:00]information as Phoebe buffet would say, but I just started playing some of them and they're quite hilariously not great, and but also somewhat addictive in classic me. Classic Sherline?
Devindra: Yes. Classic air. The game included on the airplane TV Sherline? Yes. Yeah.
Cherlynn: Okay. There is a, there is a a game that I've been playing on YouTube games called a Phone Case Designer.
Devindra: Okay, yeah,
Cherlynn: that's my recommendation.
Devindra: Thank you for that Cherlynn. Actually Ben, do you want to shout anything out? Cuz I got a I need to run to the bathroom. Yeah, I think so. Okay, go for it Yeah, yeah,
Ben: I get to do a producer pick that's cool Okay, so a couple of years ago, there was a book that came out called uncanny valley by Anna Weiner or Weiner I think it might be Weiner and it's generally like a A Story that I am very familiar with which is like this is a non fiction book It's about a woman's experience [00:59:00] going from the publishing world to working in startups in the early 2010s She started out working for this like big data company when big data was first rising and then moved over to github and Is just talking about her personal experience with the weird culture of the bay area during that time Because in that time of the early to mid 2010s, was when like the population of the Bay Area, especially like San Francisco Oakland area, was really Turning over.
There were a lot of people, a lot of young professionals coming from all over the country to work at these startups, making a lot of money, like talking about doing ayahuasca trips and how even when they're tripping, they're thinking about like B2B business solutions. It's strange. It's not something that I wasn't already aware of, but it was, it's just [01:00:00] fun to Listen to I'm listening to the audiobook.
Cherlynn: Yeah. I mean, that's why we all do the pop culture picks from different people because different people have different tastes and you have your taste and I love to play silly little YouTube games. So there you go. Simon B in the chat says YouTube games are too addicting. So I feel like I feel supported.
Where were you back in the Facebook games
Devindra: era, Sherilyn? Were you deep in Farmville
Cherlynn: or not? Yeah. PVZ? No, I didn't play Farmville, even though I think I could have. And I think a lot of people in my circles did play them. It feels
Ben: Okay. Okay. So, Dev, do you have a pick? Yeah, I'll
Devindra: do real, real quick.
I do want to shout out that one of the greatest TV shows ever made, which has been inaccessible for a long time, Homicide Life on the Street. One of the best cop shows ever made is it's now wire before the wire wire before the wire based on david simon's book with a lot of people who went on to produce other tv shows like bosh it is now streaming on peacock.
It's an incredible show starring the late great andre brauer so You miss Andre Brower from Brooklyn [01:01:00]Nine Nine. A lot of great actors, like characters that were established in Homicide went on to Law and Order and other things. So it's a fantastic show. You should check it out. Especially the first few seasons.
It's streaming right now. I have the DVD set, which was great. It's just on sale, but I don't, I'm still happy to have that because I feel like the digital version can go any, any time you get to buy the things you love. So that's what I've got for this week.
Cherlynn: Well, that's it for the episode this week, everyone.
Thank you as always for tuning in. Our theme music is by game composer, Dale North. Our outro music is by our former managing editor, Terrence O'Brien. The podcast is produced by Ben Elman. You can find Dev or Davindra online at
Devindra: And Devindra on Twitter, Blue Sky, Mastodon, the usual places. And I chat about movies and TV at the Filmcast, thefilmcast.
com.
Cherlynn: If you want to hit me up, I am occasionally on Twitter. Still, I am at Cherlynn Lowe there C H E R L Y N N L O W. But you can hit me up on threads where I am posting [01:02:00] engagement bait at C H E R L Y N N S T A G R A M. Always email us your thoughts about this podcast at podcastatengadget. com. Leave us a review on iTunes or whatever you're getting your podcast on because that helps people discover us.
And subscribe on anything that gets podcasts.
Ben: Were you deep in Farmville or not?
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/engadget-podcast-pixel-9-reviews-and-gamescom-2024-113003049.html?src=rss
Over the past few years, the concept of "AI PCs" has gone from sounding like a desperate attempt to revive the computer industry, to something that could actually change the way we live with our PCs. To recap, an AI PC is any system running a CPU that's equipped with a neural processing unit (NPU), which is specially designed for AI workloads. NPUs have been around for years in mobile hardware, but AMD was the first company to bring them to x86 PCs with the Ryzen Pro 7040 chips.
Now with its Ryzen AI 300 chips, AMD is making its biggest push yet for AI PCs — something that could pay off in the future as we see more AI-driven features like Microsoft's Recall. (Which, it's worth noting, has also been dogged with privacy concerns and subsequently delayed.) To get a better sense of how AMD is approaching the AI PC era, I chatted with Ryzen AI lead Rakesh Anigundi, the Ryzen AI product lead and Jason Banta, CVP and GM of Client OEM. You can listen to the full interview on the Engadget Podcast.
My most pressing question: How does AMD plan to get developers onboard with building AI-powered features? NPUs aren't exactly a selling point if nobody is making apps that use them, after all. Anigundi said he was well aware that developers broadly "just want things to work," so the company built a strategy around three pillars: A robust software stack; performant hardware; and bringing in open-source solutions.
"We are of the philosophy that we don't want to invent standards, but follow the standards," Anigundi said. "That's why we are really double clicking on ONNX, which is a cross platform framework to extract the maximum performance out of our system. This is very closely aligned with how we are working with Microsoft, enabling their next generation of experiences and also OEMs. And on the other side, where there's a lot of innovation happening with the smaller ISVs [independent software vendors], this strategy works out very well as well."
He points to AMD's recently launched Amuse 2.0 beta as one way the company is showing off the AI capabilities of its hardware. It's a simple program for generating AI images, and runs entirely on your NPU-equipped device, with no need to reach out to OpenAI's DallE or Google's Gemini in the cloud.
AMD
AMD's Banta reiterated the need for a great tool set and software stack, but he pointed out that the company also works closely with partners like Microsoft on prototype hardware to ensure the quality of the customer experience. "[Consumers] can have all the hardware, they can have all the tools, they can have all the foundational models, but making that end customer experience great requires a lot of direct one to one time between us and those ISV partners."
In this case, Banta is also referring to AMD's relationship with Microsoft when it comes to building Copilot+ experiences for its systems. While we've seen a handful of AI features on the first batch of Qualcomm Snapdragon-powered Copilot+ machines, like the new Surface Pro and Surface Laptop, they're not available yet on Copilot+ systems running x86 chips from AMD and Intel.
"We're making that experience perfect," Banta said. At this point, you can consider Ryzen AI 300 machines to be "Copilot+ ready," but not yet fully Copilot+ capable. (As I mentioned in my Surface Pro review, Microsoft's current AI features are fairly basic, and that likely won't change until Recall is officially released.)
As for those rumors around AMD developing an Arm-based CPU, the company's executives, naturally, didn't reveal much. "Arm is a close partner of AMD's," Banta said. "We work together on a number of solutions across our roadmaps... As far as [the] overall CPU roadmap, I can't really talk about what's coming around the corner." But given that the same rumor points to NVIDIA also developing its own Arm chip, and considering the astounding performance we've seen from Apple and Qualcomm's latest mobile chips, it wouldn't be too surprising to see AMD go down the same Arm-paved road.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/amd-explains-its-ai-pc-strategy-123004804.html?src=rss
What if you could take the benefits of solid-state speaker drivers — specifically, their extreme thinness and lack of moving parts — and bring them to cooling fans? That's what xMEMS aims to do with its new XMC-2400 µCooling (microcooling) chip. It's a 1mm-tall solid-state fan on a chip that can actively cool extremely thin devices like smartphones and tablets. Based on the same MEMS (Micro-electromechanical systems) technology as the company's upcoming ultrasonic driver inside headphones, the micro-cooling chip could lead to slim devices that are less prone to overheating and capable of better sustained performance.
Consider this real-world example: If my fan-less M2 MacBook Air had xMEMS' XMC-2400 chips installed, it wouldn't have died on me while I was working in the sun at Apple's WWDC last year. It's not hard to imagine other potential solutions: Headphones that can cool down your ears; gaming controllers that can keep your paws from getting sweaty; tablets that can eke out even more speed from their hardware.
xMEMS
In earbuds like Creative's Aurvana Ace, xMEMS' solid-state drivers excelled at reproducing mid- and high-range, but they were paired together with a traditional bass driver to handle low-end frequencies. xMEMS' next-generation solid-state driver, dubbed Cypress, holds its own across all frequencies—-and it's that same air-pushing power that the new micro-cooling chip relies on.
According to Mike Housholder, xMEMS VP Marketing and Business Development, the XMC-2400 µCooling chip uses ultrasonic modulation to create pressure pulses for air movement. It weighs less than 150 milligrams and can move "up to 39 cubic centimeters of air per second with 1,000 Pascals of back pressure," xMEMS says. Since it's a solid-state device, there aren't any moving parts like rotors or fins to fail, and its thin design means it can be placed directly atop heat-generating components like APUs and GPUs. It's also resistant to dust and water damage with an IP58 rating.
xMEMS isn't the only company pursuing ultra-thin, solid-state cooling. Frore's AirJet Mini and Mini Slim can both generate 1,750 Pascals of back pressure, but they're also larger and thicker than the XMC-2400, measuring 2.8mm and 2.5mm thick, respectively. Frore showed off its technology by hacking it into a MacBook Air, and according to The Verge, it pushed out heat and led to improved sustained performance.
xMEMS
As Housholder puts it, xMEMS' technology is more flexible since its far thinner, and manufacturers can also choose from side- and top-venting options. He expects the XMC-2400 to cost under $10 per chip, and that "four to five" existing partners will get their hands on it by the end of the year. Other manufacturers can snag it in the first quarter of 2025. xMEMS' fabrication partners, TSMC and Bosch, can easily switch from building its speakers today to constructing micro-cooling chips tomorrow, Housholder says. There's no need to change equipment or production lines.
As devices like the iPad Pro juggle extreme thinness with powerful performance, the need for some sort of ultra-thin active cooling solution is clear. We can't escape physics, after all—that's something I learned when my MacBook Air died on Apple's own campus. While we still need to see the xMEMS micro-cooling chip in action to form any sort of judgment, theoretically, it could end up being indispensable in the future.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/this-1mm-fan-on-a-chip-could-put-active-cooling-inside-ultra-thin-gadgets-130014002.html?src=rss
Is the second time the charm for Google's foldable? In this episode, Devindra chats with Senior Writer Sam Rutherford about his hands-on impressions of the new Pixel 9 Pro Fold. It has bigger screens and a sleeker design than its predecessor, but how does it compare to the other foldables out there? And why isn't it called the Pixel Fold 2?!
Listen below or subscribe on your podcast app of choice. If you've got suggestions or topics you'd like covered on the show, be sure to email us or drop a note in the comments! And be sure to check out our other podcast, Engadget News!
Topics
Thoughts on Google’s Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the rest of Google’s event – 1:39
Eric Schmidt blames work from home and work-life balance for Google’s loss of AI advantage – 31:07
U.S. Department of Justice considering breaking up Google after monopoly ruling – 33:32
Hackers may have leaked every American’s Social Security Number – 38:04
Meta officially shuts down CrowdTangle, a critical tool for monitoring misinformation on Facebook – 40:50
Apple is opening up its NFC to third-party developers – 43:12
Hosts: Devindra Hardawar and Sam Rutherford Producer: Ben Ellman Music: Dale North and Terrence O'Brien
Transcript
Devindra: What's up, Internet, and welcome back to the Engadget Podcast. I'm Senior Editor Devindra Hardawar. This week I'm joined by scene writer Sam Rutherford. Hey, Sam. Hey, how you doing? Doing okay. And we got you here to talk more about, the Google devices, but specifically the new Pixel 9 Pro Fold, a name that I hate.
I know you hate it, too. We'll talk about why. That's kind of messy. And also, some of your, you know, further thoughts from the Google event, Sam. Cherlynn and I did do, a post event. Chat that went for an hour that there's a live stream. There's an episode on the podcast feed about that too. So if you want to hear broader thoughts about the pixel nine event, the made by Google event, go check it out there.
How do you think it went overall, Sam?
Sam: I think Google is not already really great about protecting its leaks. and you know, they even got to the point where you know, Hey, we're just going to tease the new stuff, you know, months ahead of time, because. Hey, if we release it, then it's not a leak.
A lot of people may be getting a little tired of this at this point, but obviously the big focus again was on AI. So we got, you know, some new AI features, some new AI camera features and some other stuff. And on one hand, like I can see the fatigue setting in, but on the other hand, it's you know, Hey, Google is you know, the more, every, every time they have one of these events and they add new AI features, they're really kind of filling out that like suite of AI powered software features tools.
And it's okay. And it's after a while, it's wow, there's just so many things. And obviously it can be difficult because. Yeah. There's a lot of things for the consumer or, you know, new buyers to like sort through, but at the same time, there's just, there's a lot of different, you know, versatility there to talk about.
Devindra: It's a, it was a pretty big event. we'll talk about what worked and what didn't. I will say upfront folks, be sure to subscribe to us on iTunes or your podcast of choice. Leave us a review on iTunes, drop us an email at podcast@engadget.com. I want to hear your feedback and join us Thursdays, typically around 1045 AM Eastern on our YouTube channel where we do the live stream.
sometimes we'll have devices, but we'll always do Q and A with people. So if you want to chat directly with us and if you've got questions about the latest news, that's a good thing to join in for. It was kind of a wild event, Sam, but I think one thing that was interesting is that it was actually a live event, right?
It was not just a pre recorded video like Apple does. Samsung is still doing live events now too, but Samsung doesn't typically do like onstage demos of new software. And that's something Google tried to do and it didn't work out all the time. There, there's good and bad to that, right? Like the, the first demo we saw, which was something of a, you know, capturing information, comparing it to your calendar.
Basically, somebody took a photo of something at was asking the, you know, Gemini, am I free for this? Can you add this to my calendar? It failed three times. It took 60 seconds. What did you think about just that demo? Because it seemed like a big failure of the whole idea of AI assistance.
Sam: There's the pros and cons. Obviously, you know, anytime it's like the curse of live demos, right. That, that, that struck Google again, this kind of always happens anytime someone gets bold enough to try to do a live demo, but at the same time, after that initial flub, they did a lot more live demos throughout the live stream.
And they all ran pretty smooth except for one issue with the reimagined feature, which kind of, you know, uses prompts to replace backgrounds or foregrounds and subjects, you know, they had one example of look kind of wonky, but you know, because they had multiple choices, multiple results for that feature.
They were just able to swipe to the next one. And it's Oh, Hey, that looks pretty good. and so I think, you know, once again, you're seeing the fallibility of AI. Just a, sometimes it doesn't work. Sometimes it times out. I mean, it's also hard to know. That's you know, was that, you know, a pre production software thing?
Was that just a simple bug? Was it a connection issue? So it's hard to tell. but at the same time, I think once they kind of, you know, got on board with everything, it did show you that Hey, a lot of these things are happening on device and they're pretty fast. It just sucks that I guess for them that it was kind of marred by the initial flub of, you know, You know, the live bug demo.
Devindra: Yeah, there was like a multiple attempt flub to and it took a while and it was a little awkward. So that's not the best way to kick off a live event, right? It's
Sam: just, you know, it's hard to deal with when you're just sitting there waiting for something to happen. Then it kind of comes out.
Devindra: It's a nightmare.
I felt, I felt embarrassed for that person, but also listen, it would have been also pretty easy if you just looked at your calendar and used your brain to match the information on that picture. yeah, they're trying to sell us ways that AI could make our lives easier. And it still seems like in some ways, just doing, looking at your calendar, doing something manually could be easier and faster.
So I guess we'll, we'll see where all this goes. I really want to talk about the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Sam. So you did the hands on, go check out the Sam's coverage of that and the video of that, I really got stuck, held up just with the name of this thing because we were all expecting a pixel fold to or something like that.
Clean, simple, a sequel to the pixel fold. I think it's not a great name for a device like this. It may not matter in the long run, but what do you think, Sam?
Sam: No, I completely agree. It's not a great name, but at least from Google's perspective, here's the rationale. The rationale is that. They just announced a whole bunch of pixel nine phones.
We got the pixel nine, the pixel nine pro, which is a new size. It's the smaller version of the pro, but you still get that, you know, optical zoom camera. And then you have the pixel nine pro XL, which is the big flagship that we've had before, but just kind of get us tweaked XL name on that. And so they really wanted the pixel nine pro fold for people to know that it's part of the rest of the pixel family.
So it still has the same tensor G4 chip. All the same AI features, you know, very similar display specs, similar design language. And so really that's the whole from their rationale. They want people to know that the pro fold is part of the pixel 9 family and that's why you can't get that convoluted name.
Devindra: I totally get it. But it also seems like Google brain stuff to you and we're seeing responses in the chat. hey, just get over the name. Yeah, ultimately probably doesn't matter, but we're asking you to think a little deeper here. And it does seem endemic of the way Google handles consumer products in general.
It's not a clean name. I don't think it really matters if people know if it's part of the Pixel 9 family or not, because it is a foldable. It's the newest foldable. A lot of people would assume it'll have the latest Hardaware, calling it Pixel. And then you can't just call it the Pixel 9 fold.
Because it's more than the pixel line. It's pro. So then you're just adding all these things. It feels like big engineer brain mistake to be like, we got to make sure it all fits into the product family rather than the way human may. Yeah, it's one of those things where I think someone
Sam: could have just been at Google be like, Hey, let's just keep it simple and land on something a little cleaner.
But I think this is actually maybe an overcorrection from last year. Because if you remember last year, the pixel fold came out before the pixelate family. Right. And it had a worse chip, you know, had the tensor G2. and so I think that's, I think it's really kind of an overcorrection on that kind of unforced error from the previous year.
and so I guess that's where we're at. you know, for me, I'm just going to call it the pro folds. Maybe hopefully we get You know, a pro fold 10, and then maybe they kind of rearranged that, next year we'll see, but yeah, that's, that's kind of where we're at the whole
Devindra: thing. So what is new this year?
you had a really great write up, Sam, where it basically looks like this thing is a lot more polished. The screens are bigger and it seems like they solved a lot of the problems from the original pixel fold, right?
Sam: Yeah. I mean, I, I kind of love the shape of the original pixel fold just because it's, it's so unique.
It has that you know, almost passport shaped. Dimensions. But for the pro fold, Google actually did something really clever is like their whole goal with the original pixel fold was to make the outside screen more usable. And they did that by making it a little bit wider, a little bit shorter, a little, kind of a little bit squattier.
But this year, what they did is basically took an outside screen. That's almost exactly the same size as the standard pixel nine. And it looks like
Devindra: exactly the same screen, which would be easier to build
Sam: too. I think in the video, I hold it up and you can see it's almost exactly the same size. And so if you're talking about an outside screen, that's usable.
Well, there you go. You can't like, no, one's ever going to say that the pixel nine screen is not usable and that's exactly pretty much what you're getting on the pro fold. And then, that also sidesteps another issue, small issue, that you had on the original pixelfold, is that because when you open it up, The flexible main screen was a, in landscape mode, there were some sites and some apps that just, they kind of freak out because they don't understand a phone.
That's default landscape mode because everything else is portrait mode. And so you would sometimes have to rotate the phone into portrait mode and then you'd get a landscape view. And it was just a weird experience. It didn't happen very often, but when it did, you're like, well, that's just unusual. And so you'd have to get over that.
So by having that main display now in the pro fold in portrait mode, by default, it's pretty much like all the other foldables on the net. So it's from a developer's perspective, it's a lot easier for, you know, compatibility thing.
Devindra: Developers hate awkward or different screen sizes, right? They do
Sam: not updating their apps just for a single device.
Devindra: So, yeah, so it's like more in line. Now, what is interesting about the pixel nine pro fold is that, Yeah, that outside screen, you could just live on that all the time. And then occasionally pop it open and do the big screen. Whereas I think the argument for a lot of foldables before was you've got basic information on the front screen, but you really want to always be open most of the time.
I feel like Google has struck an interesting balance here. Yeah, it's sort of a subtle design shift where
Sam: they're kind of acknowledging that. I think people, it's more of a 50 50 scenario where like you're using the outside screen 50 percent of the time and using that main screen 50 percent of the time or some somewhere in that ballpark.
And so both the screen sizes and aspect ratios of both displays are super important. Some other small design changes is that Google is claiming that it's the thinnest foldable on the market at about 5. 1 millimeters. That's not actually true. because both the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 and the Honor Magic V3.
Are slightly thinner, like less than a millimeter thinner. So you're, you're really hedging. I think, you know, that they mean us market,
Devindra: right? Yeah. In the
Sam: U S market, that claim still holds true. And then the main display is now also eight inches from corner to corner, which is up from about 7. 6 ish. so it's bigger than the Z fold six, and bigger than, you know, the one plus open and stuff like that.
Although I think there is a. Maybe one Chinese foldable or two that is slightly bigger. So once again, they're kind of just talking about us, availability in terms of like biggest screen, thinnest foldable, and whatnot.
Devindra: And eight inch internal screen is pretty massive. that's just, yeah, you are fully a tablet at that point.
I think, how is the screen crease? Cause that is the thing that always gets me about a full I mean, it's still there.
Sam: No, no company has completely gotten rid of it. there, there's some arguments on the laptop side where, you know, Maybe they have done it, but it's to me, especially like I'm, I'm, you know, I'm a little biased because I've been using foldables for so long.
It's like the whole matrix thing. I do not even see the crease there. It's does not exist to me. so I guess that's where it's at. If you are the kind of person, it's, it's one of those things where like you have to try it and then you realize. Oh, the crease does not actually matter at all, but you know, from an outspite perspective, if that thing bugs you, it's going to still bug you now because it is visible.
Technically.
Devindra: I've got to actually, when it comes to like video watching, I'm, I imagine if I'm full screening a video on that, it's good. It's going right to the middle of the screen, like with the screen, with the crease in between, but I guess you could conceivably. Yeah. Have the video running at the top of the screen and have stuff at the bottom and maybe avoid you honestly
Sam: only really notice it when you're viewing it from a really acute angle, anything close to like head on where like you're holding the phone in front of your face like you normally would, you won't really see it and it's even less noticeable in like darker environments like inside You know, if you're outside doors, you know, you're going to use that, but you're probably using the exterior screen when you're outdoors, walking around anyways.
Devindra: Yeah. I imagine it's more I think about how I use devices with kids now. Right. And having something like that, like juggling a, a thicker device, like I will, if I'm running around with the kids outside, I could never open that phone and use it as a tablet, but I want it to be durable.
I want it to feel like a typical phone. How is the design otherwise? Cause I feel like the pixel nine design this year for Google is a little Is a big step up. Like the camera bar is less ugly. It's less prominent. It's almost like a pill. I mean, yeah, there's a lot of stuff on
Sam: that are, are so divided because it's some people really love the camera bar and they kind of got rid of that now, now it's just like a It's a pill shaped module and, you know, I kind of likened it to the, you know, now it really looks like an among us character, but Hey, there's, you know, that's whatever.
but you know, Google is saying that it's twice as durable as before. you're getting Gorilla Glass Victus 2 front and back. you know, and you can argue, almost argue that they're kind of borrowing a little bit of Apple's styling because it has, you know, kind of flat boxy sides. less, you know, it doesn't have the tapered rounded edges like we've gotten on the, you know, Past, Pixel Pro versions at least.
and so I think I personally, I kind of like it. but beauty is in the eye of the beholder as always.
Devindra: I think there's some objective things you can point to be like, well, this is a little more polished than before. Even if you, even if you love the camera bar, I pixel nine because I ended up writing up that news.
It does seem like the sleekest pixel ever made. Google has finally figured out some material issues and some like design elements to. Make something that looks a lot more modern than the old pixel six design, which we've kind of been iterating on for the past several years, just with the camera bar and everything.
Sam: Yeah. And I think, I think this is a good evolution of right, of the pixel six design, which they have been kind of iterating on for three generations. And now we're kind of getting something new. So. I think this is a nice kind of bridge in between those two kind of the directions.
Devindra: Yeah. And you play with a lot of foldables, Sam.
You use a lot of foldables or don't you mean, the latest galaxy fold?
Sam: or I, I just wrote, a kind of one year durability on the pixel fold. So if, you know, go check out the site for that. How does
Devindra: this compare? you know, what, is it that much better? Does it feel better? Does it look better? Cause that screen looks great too.
Yeah. And one of
Sam: those things, like I said, I originally, I was like, really, I really liked the shape of the pixel fold, but the new, design of the pro fold is definitely growing on me. The one thing that I'm still trying to figure out, nail down, confirm for sure is that it doesn't look like they changed the sensors, the camera sensors on, from the pixel fold to the pro fold.
and I, I just really wish they did that because even though you know, when I recently reviewed the Z fold six, the pixel fold is already a better camera offers better image quality than Samsung's foldable. But I really don't, you know, I don't want Google to do the thing where like. They're kind of, passing the buck between generations on the foldable because it's like, Oh, we don't want to update the sensors.
We did it last year. And then you're waiting two years, between, you know, sensor upgrade.
Devindra: Has Google confirmed that? Cause I know you guys reached out to them.
Sam: About we're still, you know, we're still waiting on review devices and confirmation on that. So, you know, by the time a review is out, we'll know for sure.
Devindra: It's one of those things. I feel like Google has been really cagey about this release in general, right? these devices aren't shipping with Android 15. That feels like a pretty big, big thing, right? I guess they're just coming too early for the release of Android 15. And this, this event is basically two months earlier than when they typically do it.
We typically get pixel stuff in October, right? So it feels like they want to preempt Apple, but how do you feel about running older Android at this point?
Sam: I think that might also be a kind of like correction from previous last year and the year before we, there was kind of some like software bugginess that, you know, popped up around, you know, at the rollout of previous Android versions, especially on the pixel.
And then you know, we saw in like last year on November, December and into the new year, like they had to release some extra patches to kind of shore up the bugs. And so if this means that we're going to get less buggy releases of Android, especially when they come to the pixel. I'm kind of okay with it.
And especially for this year where there weren't any like groundbreaking overhauls to Android itself. I'm, you know, I'm not, I'm not too upset.
Devindra: I feel like they're also more interested in the upgrades coming through Gemini and a lot of that will be on Android 14 and eventually in Android 15, but you don't need Android 15 to get a lot of the AI stuff they're hyping up.
So it's almost like a weird separation between the AI software and the base software and the base software will matter less and less, I guess.
Sam: Yeah, and I think all the mobile OS's are so mature at this point that you're, you're looking for better stability and, you know, can you get new feature drops, you know, Google's been really good about doing regular feature drops.
And so I think that isn't going to change. And so that I think it, they're kind of striking, maybe a better balance. And in some ways, this puts more of the focus on the Hardaware and the new features on the phones. And so if you're really interested in that, that's great. And then, Hey, you get kind of like a second present later when Android 15 arrives.
Devindra: Yeah, definitely. we saw the news about, AT& T is not going to be carrying the pixel nine pro fold. Is that, do you feel like that's surprising or does this, I think it just kind of makes sense for like a big carrier where many people won't be buying a super a 1799 foldable.
Sam: Yeah. I think when we're talking about foldables, I think it makes sense because AT& T doesn't release, you know, sales numbers, per device, but I can't imagine they were selling through that many and when you, you know, talking about, you know, a company that has thousands of retail locations and suddenly they have to train their, you know, their salespeople and their technicians on, you know, how to educate the customer about these phones.
And they have to get, you know, by display units to put in a certain number of stores. I think it kind of makes sense that like for a foldable, most foldable people, at least me in the past, you know, if I'm going to buy a foldable, I'm going to buy directly from the manufacturer. And so I think a lot of foldable people are like that.
And so it's not really a huge loss. And then, you know, AT& T might actually be saving money by not carrying the fold. That one thing is that this also sort of suggests that, you know, overall market share of foldables isn't super hot and that's a little disappointing, but like you said, that kind of goes back to the pricing issue where.
You know, the pro fold cost the same as the last one, 1, 800. It is a hundred dollars less than the Z fold six. I'm not sure how much that is going to matter ultimately. Cause they're both really expensive. Yeah. Yeah. but we'll, we'll see. I, I'm actually, you know, a little bit more positive on how, you know, the pixel, nine pro fold stacks up against the Z fold six.
even though the Z fold does have a few features like style support and Dex mode that aren't really available on, you know, Google's version.
Devindra: You know, I've, I've spent a lot of money on smartphones. Like I ended up getting the 15 pro max with a decent amount of storage, but I still like close to 2, 000 for foldable is like a killer thing.
And, you know, when Apple does it too, it's not going to be, they're going to look at the competition may even be more expensive than everybody else. we've talked about the Z flip and how the sort of like. Portrait style foldables that flip down like the razor as well. Those are getting more inexpensive.
You know, those are under a thousand dollars now and seem like approachable, like a typical smartphone. Do you think that style of foldable is just catching on better because of the price?
Sam: I definitely think there's a way more runway just simply because like you said, the price, and I think it also taps into a slightly different kind of maybe less techie audience because both Samsung and Motorola are, You know, kind of making more stylish, fashionable plays with both of those phones.
Motorola even has a thing where you can hold the phone up to like your, your shirt or your pants or whatever, and it will take a picture. And then I'll make the background of your phone match the pattern on your clothes, which is just like completely unnecessary. But Hey, if you're really into styling out and going full matchy matchy, that's kind of cool.
And he's in, especially on Motorola's case, you can get. The lower tier, a new razor for, I think, 800 wild. And then you get a thousand for the razor plus, and then the Z flip six is that I think 1100. so yeah, those are a lot more affordable, but like you said, I really wish that we would get a kind of a similar price reduction on the big foldables because 1, 800, it's just out of reach for a lot of people.
And I think I've been noticing more people like out in the world using foldables. And so I think there's is an untapped market, but not until they get the prices down
Devindra: at probably at least under 1500 because Apple basically helped push smartphone prices beyond 1, 000 with the their max phones. I think we were all like, Oh man, are we getting to that point?
Because for a while it felt like we were at a really good spot where 500 phones could be pretty good and do everything you want them. Apple just had to push the price up. And one plus was
Sam: kind of scratching that itch with the open last year where it was 1, 800, but you could trade in any phone. Like even broken ones and bring the price down to 1, 500.
And so that is it's not the true retail price, but at least it's a little bit more affordable, approachable, because at this point, you know, most people are not most people, a lot of people might have, you know, an old like buster sitting in a drawer somewhere that they can get rid of and then. Hey, that's a free 300 discount.
What's the magic price you think for the bigger foldables? if getting under 1, 500, I feel like like 1, 500 retail price. And then if you have incentives on that, and maybe the incentives aren't quite as steep as what's available because there are some, a fair amount of pre order bonuses that Samsung and Google are doing for their foldables, but you got to get like the base retail price, at least down to 1, 500 before.
There's going to be any sort of like major traction.
Devindra: Do you ever think this is going to be like a major category for smartphones or will it always just be the elites, the super, like the people who have more money to spend because functionally it gets you a tablet and a phone, which is nice, but that premium is rough, especially when you could get a typical smartphone plus a separate tablet that has separate battery, you know, like you have to worry less about your main device losing charge throughout the day.
For a lot of people, I feel like that's still the better option and probably will be for a very long time. Do you, I don't know, you've been using this, could you live without a big foldable at this point, Sam?
Sam: I would have a hard time switching away permanently because I'm sort of on the opposite end.
I like the fact that a foldable combines a smartphone and a tablet into one device, which means there's one less device that I need to worry about keeping charged up, keeping updated, whatever. and then but in terms of like overall, like future market share, I kind of equate this to like how you have convertible cars, right?
Convertible cars are never going to be the mainstream car. You know, you're always going to have your hard tops and your, you know, regular coupes with, you know, glass roofs or whatever for a certain section of the market that really loves convertibles. I think it's just kind of the same situation for smartphone people, where there's going to be a certain section who really love that flexibility or offer a car
Devindra: is something more, more than the mainstream, I
Sam: guess.
And maybe if it's only five or 10 percent of the market, I think that's okay. but we're gonna, yeah, we're still kind of in that kind of finding out period.
Devindra: Yeah, definitely. everyone's asking, I see in the chat, people are being like, well, at least Google has, you know, foldable where's Apple in all this.
Do you think Apple even cares about the idea of a foldable smartphone or. To me, the rumors of the foldable iPad mini, because the iPad mini is this really interesting device right now where it's expensive, but still pretty powerful, as powerful as the iPad air basically, and not a huge price difference.
So I almost wonder if Apple's well, if we push that, forget about the mini. What if we had a thing that costs the same as the iPad air, but it folded in half to be smaller when you need it to, I feel like functionally that's what Apple would lean on rather than the smartphone itself. But what's your thinking?
Sam: Yeah. I mean, there's been rumors about Apple has been working on, you know, at least been testing it in the background of what a foldable iPhone would look like, and I think, you know, there's maybe a chance we see that probably not next year, maybe 2026. but you know, Apple with most things is really so hesitant that they want to make sure that it's like.
Quote unquote, perfect. Nothing's ever perfect, but it's, you know, it has that Apple polish on it before it gets released to the world.
Devindra: It's not perfect, but better than everybody else, which is what I think, like even the vision pro, like for all of its fault, it is a better headset than so many others. Like they have solved a lot of like functional issues.
So no, I don't know anything special. I see people in the chat saying, I don't know anything special about Apple's plans. But I do look at the iPad mini. I'm like, that is a really interesting device. And I just can't justify the cost. And also I think I would want a bigger screen most of the time, but what if that mini could be folded in half?
What if that mini had GPS, you know, had cellular access to what if you just didn't call it a phone, but maybe some people would buy it and actually end up using it as a big phone, I don't know. I could see that being a thing Apple would try to pursue, but then it wouldn't be the same price. I'm sure the mini will still stick around, but that thing would be, how do you get the iPad mini to cost, 1, 500 to turn it into a foldable, I guess.
Yeah, yeah.
Sam: I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Apple goes the other way and they come out with a flip style foldable first, and they don't even do a z fold competitor. just because I think It would kind of fit in with Apple's design chops and they, you know, they would be able to kind of flex on, it was like, Hey, we made this really cool pocket friendly thing that you can just throw around and it's super compact and cute.
And I think Apple hasn't had a cute phone in a while. The, the SE is they've kind of languished. And so I think, you know, going back to the, you know, remember the colorful iPhone five C like people love that thing. And so maybe this could be like a modern kind of replacement to that.
Devindra: I think the latest German rumors with the, is the next SC will probably be more like it will have the home button and everything.
Like it'll be a little more modern. So maybe that'll be a thing, but yeah, now that you bring it up, Sam, I do think an Apple flip style foldable could be good, but we've also seen the rumors of Apple also wants to be like, let's go impossibly thin, like they did with the, the latest iPad pros. If you combine the impossibly thin.
That could also fold like I feel like that's that would be the mind blowing part for a lot of people You
Sam: know like it like we we've seen that you know flip style foldables are getting really thin you know 4. 2 4. 3 millimeters and so Hey, maybe, maybe there's some truth into you know, a combination of those, those rumors, but who knows?
Devindra: Yeah, cool. Well, anything else you want to mention about the Galaxy Pro The Galaxy, not the Galaxy, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. Anything else you want to mention about this or Google's event, Sam?
Sam: Yeah, I think the kind of the last kind of follow up is that Like you said before, Google moved its, you know, annual fall lunch up to August, but if we look at the actual rollouts of the various devices, we can see that, it almost is like they weren't fully committed to that because, you know, to kind of explain that why we don't have devices in hand yet is that.
the Pixel 9 family, Pixel 9, Pixel 9 Pro, Pixel 9 Pro XL. Those are officially on sale on August 22nd. So coming up pretty soon. However, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold isn't going to be available until September 4th. Then the Pixel Watch 3, which is now available in two sizes. Finally, thank goodness. is coming out September 10th and then September 10th is right around when Apple normally has their big, you know, annual iPhone event.
And then all the way in September 26, we get the pixel buds pro two. And so this staggered launch thing is if you're going to have the event this early, you should have all the events ready to go right
Devindra: after the
Sam: event.
Devindra: It's so it's, it feels like it's all it's all FUD against Apple, right?
You have the event early. You then trickle out the devices. So people are, Oh yeah, we're totally thinking about Google and not whatever Apple's cooking next. And that may be a little presumptuous. remember when somebody found a, an early, what was it? An early pixel phone in a bar, like almost replicating the iPhone thing and nobody cared.
Sam: Yeah,
Devindra: I think that was the like testament to like how excited people are for pixel Hardaware in general. So that's just funny. Anything else you want to mention about the other devices? Like we got the pixel watch three, any of the AI features?
Sam: I think one really positive thing for the pixel watch three is that Google is moving more features out of the Fitbit subscription that you need to get like You know, daily readiness scores and, fitness metrics and some of the coaching and like personal, you know, they're really leaning into the running and training aspect, especially kind of like, you know, planning your routes and stuff like that.
And so this is something that like, I'm sure Lynn has definitely been on that bandwagon about You need to provide all the features that Apple and Samsung offer without the Fitbit subscription. And then if you want to have you know, really specialized coaching or stuff like that, that's what the Fitbit subscription is for.
But all the base like health metrics and you know, the new loss of pulse feature, which is You know, can, is a really good emergency service. You got to have that baseline. And then if you want to have subscription, you have to make that subscription really compelling, but without kind of cannibalizing the, you know, standard feature set of the device, but like I said, really happy to see the pixel watch three, get a new 45 millimeter version.
I think I've been in, you know, especially if you want, you know, people, larger people, men primarily, I think to get on board with that design, you just kind of need to offer a bigger version. and then quickly on the pixel buds pro two. I was so happy to see them decrease the size. They're I think about 20 percent smaller and lighter than the previous Pixel Buds Pro versus, you know, if you go back and look at what Samsung did to the Galaxy Buds, three line, they just kind of got rid of like the small compactness and went for more of a, you know, AirPods design with the big stem.
And so I'm really happy to see at least Google kind of double down on the Hey, we want it to be super light, super comfortable and not very obtrusive. So at least we have one of the big earbud manufacturers kind of sticking to that mantra. so I'm very happy to see that.
Devindra: I will say this about the pixel watch three.
It looks really cool. Like it looks very sleek. This does seem like the year where Google is like out there pumping sleek, modern looking Hardaware. I almost, I kind of sort of wish like I had an option of a smartwatch like that for iPhone. I'll probably I have a Apple watch series four, so I'll probably upgrade into whatever they do this year, but around the round design can look good, it looks, it can look good.
And I don't mind sacrificing a bit of screen space for that stuff. So anyway, we will be looking at all these devices soon. Keep an eye out for more coverage on our reviews over the next few weeks. Let's move on to some other news and. You know what? Something similarly related to Google, by the way, is Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, had a talk at Stanford where he said a lot of things.
I don't think people really wanted to publicize, or at least he didn't want to publicize. There was a chat at Stanford. The video that has been pulled down right now, but all the news reports about it is out there. he basically, he essentially blamed remote work Google's lagging behind on AI compared to other companies.
So. Okay. You're like, yeah, people aren't grinding enough to him. also the really, the really gross thing where he was basically like, AI startups can totally just steal IP. Does matter when you're successful, you can hire lawyers to just clean up that mess. really just saying the quiet part out loud.
I think that a lot of people assume about AI. Give me any thoughts on this, Sam. I'm not going to give him credit for this because
Sam: to blame you, like your lunch getting eaten by chat GPT on work from home.
Devindra: Yeah. It's
Sam: come on now.
Devindra: that was a deliberate choice because Google held it back because they felt it wasn't productized from all the reporting we've seen.
And then we
Sam: had that whole situation where Bard came out and then I was like, Oh, wait, Bard's not quite there yet. And then they kind of pulled back on that. And then Gemini showed up a little bit after and it's do not, you cannot blame this on work from home. This was, if anything, this was people at the top, not prioritizing or not having the correct vision on seeing where AI technology was Was going, which just feels really weird for Google because of, you know, how much time they've invested into the Google assistant and, you know, they've been crowing about AI for longer than pretty much any company out there.
And to blame that on the workers and work from home just seems kind of tone deaf to me.
Devindra: Just absolutely. I've never liked Eric Schmidt as a businessman. Like he was sort of like just the adult in a room for Google for the longest time, when, you know, posts Larry Page and Sergey Brin. But still this is how a lot of the business people think, right?
Like they, they will be the sharks about this, IP, who cares? A little legal issues. We will deal with that when we have billions of dollars. So just funny to see somebody say it out loud. And then immediately his response was he asked Stanford to take down the video and he's saying, he misspoke. He's saying, yeah, he, he did not actually mean the things he's saying.
just hilarious stuff. Don't trust the businessman. Don't trust the rich folks. Similarly related to this too. there are reports that because of, the whole Google monopoly ruling, US judge ruled that Google is officially a search monopoly. there are reports that the US government could force Google to break up.
And we don't know what that means yet, but it could mean, Hey, maybe Chrome. Becomes a separate company. Maybe Android becomes a separate company. This has been done before. the whole AT& T breakup from Ma Bell to all several different subsidiaries.
Sam: And this is similar to what Microsoft was facing as well.
And it didn't ultimately happen, but even the threat of breaking up the company, if you go and read the Past, you know, or go, go look at documentaries on bill Gates. They said that when that ruling came down and they didn't weren't forced to break up, but they had to have regulators come in and read all their emails.
It really, you know, took a lot of the wind out of Microsoft sales at that point in the company's development. And so it's right, you know, to be clear, the GOJ is, they're just mulling this. They have not even proposed this. They have not, you know, put in any legal filings. It's just something they're considering the, the issue.
The core issue to me is that for Google, the big thing is search, right? They kind of have a monopoly on search. But the thing is, is that it's not because there's, you know, they're hurting competition. People just don't want to use Bing. And, you know, there are other competitors like DuckDuckGo and whatnot, but it's you know, it's hard to say that like Google's Android business or Google's Hardaware business is thriving because of search, and so that seems like a very interesting, kind of dilemma.
Every
Devindra: Android device does make money for Google because they all have Google search by default, right? that's. Google, they're all vessels for Google ads, and I
Sam: believe there was a story that recently came out. It is you know, what could Microsoft do for Apple to make them put being as the default search thing?
And Apple was just like, Nope, no, no amount of money would, would like, cause us to do this. So I think that statement right there, it's like, it's not Google. and then it's just breaking up the company is say you break out the Android business and then you, or you break out the Hardaware business.
I know that like Apple doesn't have their own, you know, search alternative, but it seems really weird to me that especially in the U. S. where Apple has a lead in market share on, you know, On iOS, and smartphones in general that you're going to have to force Google to break up when Apple has a lot of the similar issues, just
Devindra: maybe not related to search.
Well, they're not, not like monopoly dominance is the thing. Like that's, that's where it really, where it comes down to. We're definitely gonna be talking to like legal experts about this particular story, especially as like we can, we hear more. The thing about what the US government is saying is that Google search, yes, it is, it may be technically the best search.
It may be the one people go to, but by paying competitors to make Google the default, it also just kills any, it basically kills a tadpole or kills like a competitor before they can even, even break out and be really useful because there's just no chance of anybody really getting market share. So it's sort of like market, Market share manipulation almost.
I think that's what they're really railing against. And the thing about Microsoft is that, you know, way back in the nineties, the Microsoft antitrust stuff was about Internet Explorer being a part of windows and people being forced to choose Internet Explorer. Internet Explorer was not like dominating the browser market back then.
It was still like mostly Netscape for a while. It was just that Internet Explorer was like rising very quickly. And. The thing about Google is you can look and see Oh no, like Google owns search, nobody else wants to use anything, but Google search being search is still a joke, even with chat GPT.
Like there, there are alternatives. You could pay for a slightly better search engine, but Google is just such a dominating force that nobody can really compete. I guess the question is like, what will you do to help? What can you do to help? Yeah. I mean, if you
Sam: want to put in a law to ban Google from paying other companies to use their search.
I'm, I'm okay with that and it's not like even on iPhone, you can choose a different search provider if you want, but no one does, for a good reason. Yeah.
Devindra: So I don't know. It's a, it's a messy situation. It's also going to be the legal arguments going to be like, people love Google. Google is the best search engine.
What's the problem? And I think a lot of that is a little specious because it's yeah, well, yes, you are the best. You're not, you're not fully
Sam: addressing the issue.
Devindra: Exactly.
Sam: Right.
Devindra: Exactly. Also in other news, scary news that hackers may have leaked the social security numbers of every single American.
basically according to bleeping computer, there's a data dump of 2. 7 billion records of personal info for people in the U S that includes names through social security numbers, aliases, and physical addressive, that people are known to have lived at. From what I've seen, like some people have confirmed, like it does have their information.
you, there was no, you can't go to, have I been pwned to be, to look up this database yet? Cause it's not that fully open. some people have said that the social security numbers in the databases are incorrect. In terms of who they're linking to, but still there's a lot of data out there. so I would say, go check out our posts on this whole thing.
There's a lot of, tips on what you could do if you're worried about this data being out there. Check your credit reports. That's a big thing. there are multiple services that can clean up your information. is it delete me? There are a bunch that can clean up your information online. You have to pay for it, but if you're worried and you start to notice weird stuff, It may be worth it and watch your passwords.
Everybody like use the password manager. We've got a guide on that.
Sam: I was going to say this sort of reminds me, like how back in the two thousands, everyone was like, everybody has to have an antivirus software. And so it was kind of an extra tax that you had to just deal with to exist on their internet and make yourself a little bit safer.
And now security breaches have become so commonplace that it feels like you're almost required just as a human to have some sort of You know, service like ID watch guard or delete me or whatever, just constantly monitoring your, you know, credentials or your, you know, credit history and stuff like that, and it really sucks.
and this kind of, you know, tags onto like a bigger issue of, like I said, security breaches are so commonplace. And then now we're getting into the point where there are entire, Hacker protocols where their whole goal is to gather a bunch of leaked data or breaches, and then decrypt it later once quantum computing becomes more available in some, like a lot of the current security practices.
That's a whole other scary
Devindra: thing we have to worry about to like what quantum computing will enable it. Right? And so,
Sam: NIST encryption standard to kind of sidestep this in the future. It's still very early right now, but this is, you know, something that we were going to have to follow, you know, as, as things develop.
Devindra: It's, that's, we, we've talked a bit about quantum computing before, but we, it's we're just getting around to the idea of what an AI system can do and what an NPU does and how that works compared to CPU quantum is just A whole nother level where you can't even, you can't even understand the data that's coming out of it.
It's just, it's just kind of wild. let me see here. Also, Chris Bell at Engadget wrote a really good piece about meta shutting down CrowdTangle. We've reported on this before. That was the research tool that they acquired, I think around 2016, that gave people a lot of data about what was happening on Facebook and all their services.
they killed it. They have offered an alternative service that is not as good. The thing about CrowdTangle is that everybody could have used it. Journalists, academics, researchers, everybody, the data was just out there. There's a new thing that Facebook is doing that, that Meta is doing that people have to apply for.
And from what we've seen, it's just not nearly as good. So check out Chris's report and. Think about this, like when everybody's talking about Mark Zuckerberg's glow up, Oh man, like his hair is kind of, he's trendier. He seems chiller. He's wearing cool necklaces. He's more like a bro rather than a nerd trying to mimic a Roman Emperor, almost more like a human, almost more like a human.
And I can't help but think like how much of a distraction, a lot of that stuff is like, what, what life coaching is he getting to be like, don't worry about the global consequences of your actions from your companies. Just be chill, Mark Zuckerberg. because in the
Sam: timing of this This seems a little bit weird because Zuckerberg himself has been talking about, we want to be more transparent and, you know, be, give people more insight into how meta works.
But then you go and shut this down. Granted, there is a replacement, but like you said, it's not quite as good. So it's That have just kept that thing going.
Devindra: There's a lot of criticism that they're also doing this before, like months before an election, when we really need a good service to help people figure out like where, where is the spam data?
Where is the bad stuff? Where are the bad operators? What's trending on your social network? Just to have this gone at this key moment is ridiculous. So, yeah. And the only data we're going to have stuff coming from whatever the new meta program is now, which people have to apply for. Journalists can't apply for that, by the way.
So only researchers at some institutions, not everybody's getting in. Yeah. Little, little weird. They almost don't want journalists to have all the info. all we have to rely on is the info then that meta is releasing on itself. And that is always a recipe for failure. So check out Chris's report. I think it's worth reading and we're thinking about, and maybe don't give Mark Zuckerberg too much credit for having a cooler hairdo and more style and more human interactions now, because I think a lot of it just means he's not as concerned about the problems from his own companies.
final story for us is that Apple is opening up NFC functionality to third party developers and iOS 18. 1. this was a thing that was going to be coming to the EU, but now it's coming to everybody looks and. People can use it to do tap to pay functions, functions that rely on the secure element, Sam, like you, you're the mobile guy.
What do you think about this? are you excited about more NFC stuff happening on iPhones? I'm more of just it's about time
Sam: because for, if you look at it, this is how Apple grew Apple pay by Apple pay uses NFC, but it was the only app that was allowed to use NFC on the iPhone. And so, you know, we were just talking about monopolistic practices.
It's well, that is right there, a very clear sign. And I don't think it's a coincidence that after the EU was forcing Apple to open it up, in, in Europe that now they're kind of opening it up globally to maybe sign kind of sidestep some scrutiny. Now that like they notice, Oh, DOJ is kind of given a hard look at Google.
Let's kind of get out of the spotlight for a second. So Google can step in and take the
Devindra: hit. I could almost see me more of an Apple secure thing because it's like digital payments is tough. You don't want to have any app getting access to the secure element and everything. So now developers can apply to be a part of it.
There may be additional fees to use the secure element, of course, because it's Apple, but also we took so long to get tap to pay stuff. Like other countries have had pre, I think even pre smartphones, like Japan has had like tap to pay elements for a while. or at least tap NFC sort of like tapping functionality.
It's going to be like a bigger security risk for Apple to do this. But yeah, it's, it's a good thing. I, I love tapping NFC stuff. Like I feel like I'm in the future when I can just tap my phone on something and just pay for groceries. Yeah.
Sam: Yeah. We finally got tapped to pay at the, like in the subway in New York city.
And so it's Oh, Hey, this is kind of nice. That said, you know, I just want to point out some of the sort of similarities is that the security risk is the same kind of argument that Apple used for not opening up the app store to third party, programs. And so it's it is always, there's always you know, a core thing that like Apple can point back to.
It's Oh, we're making ourselves more vulnerable, but at the same time, like it's also kind of a monopolistic practice. And so, you know, how do you, I guess the trick is, you know, how do you In terms of yeah,
Devindra: it kind of goes back to what Schmidt was talking to Eric Schmidt, basically do the thing that may be bad until, you know, somebody yells at you for, and then you deal with the repercussions.
I cannot blame Apple for being like, listen, we built this thing for our products. And this is what we're going to start with. you look at the Android. App store and like what, the Google store is a, is a disaster, like a mess of like really messy software. Not like always polished apps and a lot of malware just floating around the app store.
So it is like a balance that we definitely have to think about. I'm glad people are. Yelling at Apple about this stuff to, also kind of semi related to this. Apple is finally allowing Spotify to display pricing in the EU. Spotify is not going to be direct linking to its website. You still have to go
Sam: to the website on a different device just to, you know, sign up for your subscription.
Devindra: But now at least, at least Spotify can show their pricing in the EU within their app without making Apple mad. So that's, to me, this is the more, this is just petty. You know, this whole thing is so petty. And in terms of Apple also making people pay, if you click through an app link to buy something on a website, Apple will still take a cut because Apple saying Hey, we, we enabled that, you know, our, our platform.
No, I don't know about that. So these are the things I'm more annoyed that Apple does. And when it just seems petty, when it's not really about security, it's just about you, like almost punishing developers for going outside of your ecosystem, I think that's a big problem. But yeah, we'll be following all these stories, folks.
So keep an eye out.
Let's move on to what we're working on. On my end, I've, I'm still like in the process of testing a few new co pilot PCs, and things with AI chip. So there are a bunch of movie reviews up, and it, you know, I reviewed Borderlands, I reviewed the movie I'm going to be talking about soon and also industry season three.
So check out all that coverage on the site. Sam, what are you working on? Borderlands still makes me sad.
Sam: obviously a lot of Google stuff coming, coming up shortly. we're also starting to prep for IFA, which is, you know, the big European consumer tech show. and then recently, I just published a review for the, ACES ROG ally X, which is their kind of big refresh to their handheld gaming PC.
It's really good. It's, you know, you'll go, go read the review, but it's kind of what I wanted the original ally to be from the start. And so I think just real quickly, if you are looking for a handheld gaming PC. Your two choices are the ally X or the steam deck OLED. And so those are the kind of the two different front runners.
there are some rumors out Lenovo might have an answer to that, but not immediately, maybe closer to CES. I would also
Devindra: never hold your breath for Lenovo Hardaware. How about that? Just as a rule. Don't get too excited. See, let's see how that turns out. Anything else, Sam?
Sam: no, I mean, I'm, I should probably say that, I'm gonna be out starting for a few months.
just because, I have a new addition to the family. Yay, congrats! So, I, I'm planning to be on paternity leave for a few months, Obviously depends when the baby actually arrives.
Devindra: Yeah. Yeah. Congrats, Sam. two babies, two kids is, is this is, this is a second one. You, yeah, one is tough. One was tough for us, but two is just okay, you feel like you've got it, but then like new things arise.
So good luck. Enter the chaos zone. Enter the chaos zone. Everybody sends Sam your well wishes and everything. Let's move on to some, some pop culture picks for the week. Sam, what do you want to shout out? There's a new TFT
Sam: set, team fight tactics. This is the game that I've been playing a long time. I play the double up the two person mode with my wife.
We actually recently hit Emerald, which is like the highest we've done in terms of you know, duo gameplay. And then there's all, Riot is also releasing a new experimental PVE mode for TFT, which is like, Seems really weird because the whole, idea of the game is to beat the other people that are in your lobby.
so they, you know, right. It's very, been very clear about this. It's there's this kind of a test. It's very experimental. I'm kind of excited for it and it comes out in a couple of weeks. So if you're into auto battlers, maybe check that out. And then, the last season of Umbrella Academy is finally out.
And so I think it's kind of, kind of, I like it. I've enjoyed it when I watched it. And so I want to, you know, I want to see that series through. So I'll probably be checking that out real soon.
Devindra: Awesome. Yeah. I, I did a like last quick catch up with the boys to watch this season. And I feel like I am so many seasons behind on Umbrella Academy, but I really liked the first season.
So, yeah, good luck with that, Sam. Some things from my end, something good and something terrible. Alien Romulus, I think is fantastic. I have a review up on the site. this is a Fede Alvarez film set between Alien 1 and Aliens. And it has the like cool retro tech and style of the original films. it feels like very much an old school alien movie.
I've seen criticisms that it's trading too much on nostalgia bait and like it's doing things we've seen before. And that's also true, but I think it's also really well made. I like Fede Alvarez as a, as a director, like he has a good eye. He can construct set pieces really well. And this is basically a setup for like maybe films that feel more traditionally alien, not something like Prometheus or Alien Covenant, which were just like weird philosophical discourses by, by Ridley Scott.
Basically, these are just like proper tight. This one is a proper tight, like alien horror film. Kaylee Spaney, who's been in a bunch of movies this year, is fantastic. David Johnson, who I love, who is in industry, he's also great in this. So I think it's fantastic. See it on the biggest screen you can.
I freaking loved it. And the movie I did not love is Borderlands, which I also reviewed on Engadget and is one of the worst movies I've seen this past decade. It's just really bad. It's just a complete disaster. And I kind of felt that from the trailer. maybe catch it at home if you want to hate watch something, but good God.
I don't think Eli Roth can make good movies. I think that's where I come down. Don't spend a lot of money going to see this, whatever. Don't spend any money. Like maybe buy a ticket for a better movie and sneak into Borderlands. If you really want to see Borderlands, maybe that, maybe that's the thing.
I'm so sad because I think the look
Sam: of the movie was like,
Devindra: It seems like it
Sam: was interesting, but then everything else kind of, they dropped the ball. I mean,
Devindra: it's not even because Borderlands, the look of Borderlands, the games is like cool cel shaded stuff and the idea was always sort of like Mad Max y vibes.
the movie's trying to be both Mad Max and something else. Something else similar to Mad Max. What's in metal? Twisted Metal, maybe. Oh no, Mad Max meets Guardians of the Galaxy. That is kind of what the movie is going for with the ragtag group of anti heroes and whatnot. It's not good. Badly written. One of the screenwriters took their name off of it because they didn't want to be fully embarrassed by this thing, so.
Yeah, it's a complete disaster, and I hate it. I
Sam: should also mention, I'm getting very worried about the upcoming Transformers 1 animated movie. I've heard good
Devindra: things
Sam: about that. I hope you're right, because it looks like It looks silly. It looks like This looks like the Transformers people are trying to make a Marvel movie and that including the casting.
And I'm not very excited about that as a longtime Transformers fan, but it's also like reserve judgment. Yeah,
Devindra: it is also a prequel set on, their robot planet, but also where Optimus and Megatron were friends.
Sam: I mean, so that actually, yeah, that was a thing going back to the original, not necessarily friends, but they have a long history.
I'm aware of a long history, but not like bros, you know? Yeah, it's like almost touching on like the whole buddy cop thing and then like they, you know, start betraying each other and stuff. Like you guys got to do better.
Devindra: I've heard good things. That movie also has a good director. So yeah, hope to be checking it out.
Sam, if you're, I don't know if you're around, maybe you can help us review that one. Okay. Cause it sounds like you're into transformers. Anyway, that's what we've been watching. That's the episode for this week, folks. As always, our theme music is by game composer, Dale North. Our outro music is by our former managing editor, Terrence O'Brien.
Podcast is produced by Ben Elman. You can find me online and at Devindra on Twitter, BlueSky, Mastodon, all the fun places. Where can we find you, Sam? Find me at Sam Rutherford, on X and then as always on Engadget. com. Awesome. Email us at podcasts at Engadget. com. Leave us a review on iTunes and subscribe on anything that gets podcasts.
And be sure to check out the other episodes we dropped this week. we had, the post Google event chat with me and Sherlynn, and I also talked with some AMD executives about their thoughts on AIPC. So don't miss that. Thanks folks. We're out.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/engadget-podcast-pixel-9-pro-fold-hands-on-thoughts-113024736.html?src=rss
Set between the original Alien and its more bombastic sequel, Aliens, Fede Alvarez's Alien: Romulus echoes the the greatest elements of those films, while also delivering his own spin on the 45-year-old franchise. There's the elegant interplay of light and shadow from Alien, along with nods to Ridley Scott's artful aesthetic. And there are finely crafted set pieces evoking the horror and sheer badassery of James Cameron's Aliens. But Alvarez also expands the Alien universe by focusing on a group of twenty-somethings who were raised in a decrepit Weyland-Yutani colony, and whose main goal is to escape the bureaucratic clutches of their corporate overlords.
While it's easy to dismiss Alien: Romulus as a mere rehash meant to appeal to younger audiences, it's hard to deny the sheer level of craft on display. Alvarez's eye for composition was clearly influenced by the series auteurs, from the opening shot of a field of stars that reveals a crashed ship rendered invisible by the blackness of space, to later sequences set alongside a planet's ice-filled rings. And he can masterfully orchestrate tension for both action and horror, another skill borrowed from Scott and Cameron. Just like Alvarez's hyper violent (and excellent!) Evil Dead remake, he’s able to put his own spin on an iconic horror franchise without being a slavishly devoted fanboy.
Murray Close
Our Ripley counterpart for Alien: Romulus is Rain (Cailee Spaeny), a young woman who recently lost both of her parents to a Weyland-Yutani mining operation. The only family she has left at a sun-less backwater colony is her brother Andy (David Jonsson), a malfunctioning android who's directed to care for her.
After Rain's request to leave her colony is denied and her mandatory work commitment is unjustifiably extended by several years, she joins a group of friends to covertly head off-world. The plan involves stealing cryostasis pods from a decommissioned space station — which, as you might expect, houses untold horrors. As Rain and her friends explore the station, they encounter facehuggers, get a quick lesson in Xenomorph biology and find themselves being hunted down one by one.
Spaeny is effortlessly believable as an empathetic-yet-tough heroine (a notable accomplishment as she's practically a full foot shorter than the original Alien lead, Sigourney Weaver), and Jonsson makes for a compelling and sympathetic android. It's somewhat troubling that the film heaps a ton of abuse on its only black character, though, and he doesn't get much motivation outside of his programming. Still, Jonsson, who was incredible on the first few seasons of Industry, manages to bring a bit of soul into Andy.
20th Century Studios
Admittedly, we've seen much of this before, but I still think there's value in introducing an entirely new generation to the Alien franchise. Scott's Prometheus and Alien: Covenant were intriguing for longtime fans, but they were also bogged down by the director's own fascination with androids and Weyland-Yutani backstory. They weren't exactly the best entry-point into the series. And sure, Alien and Aliens are easy to find and remain fantastic films, but I’ve personally found it tough to get some younger audiences to engage with older films.
By focusing on a twenty-something crew instead of older, world-weary space truckers or colonists, Alien: Romulus also better captures the viewpoint of a new generation of viewers. But Millennials and Gen Z are well aware the Earth is dying, and they've seen how global corporations got us into this mess.
20th Century Studios
It’s not hard to see the parallels between Weyland-Yutani sending workers to their doom to unearth the secrets of the Xenomorphs – creatures that could potentially wipe out all of humanity – to the fossil fuel companies ignoring the climate crisis they helped create. The human cost doesn’t matter, not when there’s massive profit potential and shareholder value on the horizon.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/tv-movies/alien-romulus-is-a-magnificent-return-to-form-193025453.html?src=rss
Google has officially dropped its major 2024 devices a few months earlier than usual. At its Made By Google event this week, the company unveiled the Pixel 9 and 9 Pro, as well as its foldable follow-up, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. As for new accessories, we got the Pixel Watch 3 and Pixel Buds Pro 2. In this bonus episode, Cherlynn and Devindra chat about everything from this event, and why the heck we didn't hear more about Android 15.
(Apologies for any audio issues in this episode, it was partially recorded in a noisy hotel room.)
Listen below or subscribe on your podcast app of choice. If you've got suggestions or topics you'd like covered on the show, be sure to email us or drop a note in the comments! And be sure to check out our other podcast, Engadget News!
Hosts: Devindra Hardawar and Cherlynn Low Producer: Devindra Hardawar Music: Dale North and Terrence O'Brien
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/engadget-podcast-breaking-down-googles-pixel-9-launch-event-131925200.html?src=rss
Practical. Functional. Different. Those are the ways we've typically described Google's Pixel smartphones since they debuted in 2016. Google was always less concerned about making its phones look as cool as competitors — instead, its focus has been on unique camera tech and early AI capabilities. Since 2021's Pixel 6, their cases have also been dominated by a massive rear camera bar, something that allows for large sensors but is undoubtedly polarizing. You either love it as an example of Google going against the grain, or you hate it.
Photo by Google
Now with the Pixel 9, which debuted today at the company's 2024 Made By Google event, the company is finally trying to make the camera bar a bit less ugly. You could dare call it stylish. The new camera bar loses the edges of the old rectangular iterations and looks more like a wide pill box (it's almost as if Google is trolling Apple for its Magic Island). Together with a thinner design, a glass rear cover and satin metal edges, the Pixel 9 finally looks like a phone that can sit beside Samsung's latest Galaxy devices or an iPhone without shame. Those good looks will cost you though: The Pixel 9 starts at $799, $100 more than the Pixel 8.
Photo by Google
Beyond the facelift, the Pixel 9 also includes a slew of hardware upgrades that should make it more capable for AI tasks. There's Google's new Tensor G4 chip and 12GB of RAM, up from 8GB on the Pixel 8. The battery is slightly larger than before, and it can charge up to 55 percent in 30 minutes. And the screen has been upgraded as well: Google's 6.3-inch Actua OLED display is slightly larger than before as well as 35 percent brighter, reaching up to 2,700 nits.
The Pixel 9's cameras have also been totally revamped. In addition to the 50 megapixel main lens, there's also a new 48 megapixel ultrawide (up from a 12MP ultrawide last year) that can take Macro Focus shots. The 10.5MP front camera also gets auto focus this year — something that was surprisingly left out in the past. At least you won't have to worry about blurry selfies as much.
Photo by Google
As you'd expect, Google is touting the Pixel 9 as the perfect vessel for its Gemini AI. In addition to generating images or text on demand, the Pixel 9 will also be able to remember information via Pixel Screenshots. It's an on-device AI feature that sounds similar to Microsoft's Recall, but instead of relying on constant monitoring of your device, it's only going off of the screenshots you take. You could, for example, take a picture of a party invitation and then ask Gemini to recall it for you. Add Me, another on-device AI feature, will let you take a picture of friends and add yourself in later.
The Pixel 9 starts at $799 with 128GB of storage, but you can also upgrade to 256GB for $899. It'll be available on August 22, and it's coming in a slew of colors: Porcelain, Wintergreen, Peony and Obsidian.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/googles-pixel-9-is-a-sleeker-and-more-powerful-flagship-built-for-gemini-ai-170026004.html?src=rss
On paper, Eli Roth's Borderlands adaptation sounds like a recipe for a solid sci-fi romp: Oscar-winner Cate Blanchett as the wise-cracking gunslinger Lilith; Jack Black, fresh off of voicing Bowser, as the quippy/annoying Claptrap; and freaking Jamie Lee Curtis back in the genre fray after Everything Everywhere, All At Once. And yet the film is a lifeless slog better suited to an episode of Mystery Science Theater, completely squandering the potential of those elements.
Like the original game, Borderlands is mostly set on the wild alien planet of Pandora — a name that clearly should have been changed since audiences now associate it mostly with the Avatar films. Roth's adaptation makes significant changes to the game's plot and characters: It begins with Tiny Tina (Ariana Greenblatt) being rescued from a space prison by the former soldier Roland (Kevin Hart [?!]). Inexplicably, they run into the former Psycho, Kriege (Florian Munteanu), and together they all escape to find a legendary vault on Pandora, which holds untold alien treasures.
Meanwhile, in a nondescript city on another planet, Lilith gets recruited by the head of the Atlas Corporation (a scenery-chewing Edgar Ramirez) to rescue Tina, who he claims is her daughter. Like a maze hastily created for a kids menu, you can easily predict the path the film will take. Lilith reluctantly heads back to Pandora, she teams up with the other characters, and plot points are checked off with the excitement of a DMV visit
There are obligatory action scenes, as you'd expect, but it all feels routine — CG explosions, half-hearted choreography and minimal stakes.
Blanchett is an actress who has proven herself to have an enormous amount of range. She can play an awesome/terrifying Galadriel in The Lord of the Rings, and a pompous conductor in Tár. But while there are some base pleasures in seeing her rolling around with futuristic guns, she just never feels comfortable in the skin of an action heroine. There's none of the ferocity of Charlize Theron's most physical roles, or even Angelina Jolie in a middling thriller like Salt (a movie that, I assure you, is far more fun than Borderlands). Blanchett just seems too cool for this shit.
Photo by Lionsgate
And unlike other films featuring a rag-tag group of heroes, like Guardians of the Galaxy or the excellent Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves, there’s little time spent building up relationships in Borderlands. Roland seems noble, but we never really learn who he is and what’s driving him to save Tina. (I also question the wisdom of casting a comedian like Hart in a mostly straight role.) Krieg is a shell of a character who gets only a few lines of stunted dialog and no actual development. Jamie Lee Curtis’s role as the “xenoarcheologist” Tannis makes no sense at all.
What you have, ultimately, is a boring film filled with empty characters and actors who would be better off being in literally anything else. If Cate Blanchett sold out for a corny commercial campaign — if she reenacted Pacino’s Dunkaccino song for real — it would still be less embarrassing than starring in this failure. In an era where many game adaptations have been surprisingly watchable, like the Sonic and Super Mario Bros. movies, and a masterpiece of a show like The Last of Us exists, Borderlands feels like a unforced error.
Photo by Lionsgate
Instead of being a big-budget film, it could have been better off as a streaming series like Fallout. Perhaps it didn’t need two Oscar winnersand a well-known comedian like Kevin Hart. They probably should have stuck with the screenplay from the Chernobyl and Last of Us showrunnner Craig Mazin, instead of bringing in more writers. (One of the listed screenwriters is "Joe Crombie," a pseudonym for someone who didn’t want their name attached to this film.)
As it is, though, Borderlands is pure wasted potential. Go replay the games — hell, go watch some of the Borderlands fan films — instead of sitting through this atrocity.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/tv-movies/the-borderlands-movie-is-an-astounding-waste-of-potential-160032875.html?src=rss
Google is officially a monopoly, according to a US court. But what does that really mean? This week, Devindra and Senior Editor Karissa Bell dive into the landmark Google antitrust case to explore how it could affect the future of search. Google claims it's simply delivering the best product, but clearly the court thinks otherwise. Also, we chat about X/Twitter's desperate lawsuit against advertisers who boycotted the social network.
Stay tuned to the end of this episode for an interview with the creators of HBO Max's Industry, Mickey Down and Konrad Kay. We discuss season three of the series, which recently premiered, and how they plan to deconstruct the excesses of overhyped tech startups.
Listen below or subscribe on your podcast app of choice. If you've got suggestions or topics you'd like covered on the show, be sure to email us or drop a note in the comments! And be sure to check out our other podcast, Engadget News!
Topics
A U.S. court declared Google a monopoly, now what? – 1:22
X (formerly Twitter) sues advertisers for “illegal boycott” of their platform – 19:15
Meet Chromecast’s successor, the Google TV Streamer – 33:49
Less than a year after SAG strike, Meta is offering actors millions to use their voice in AI – 41:01
Where does all the Facebook AI slop come from? 404Media found out – 44:30
People are returning Humane’s AI Pin faster than they can sell them – 50:23
Working on – 53:43
Pop culture picks – 53:58
Industry interview with Mickey Down and Konrad Kay - 1:02:00
Hosts: Devindra Hardawar and Ben Ellman Guest: Karissa Bell Producer: Ben Ellman Music: Dale North and Terrence O'Brien
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/engadget-podcast-the-google-search-monopoly--industry-creator-interview-113028361.html?src=rss