Starlink is getting ready to launch its second generation of satellites, and it's expected to match the speeds of a traditional terrestrial network. During a keynote at Mobile World Congress, Starlink execs detailed the roadmap for the company's upgrade towards the next generation of satellites called V2.
"The goal of Starlink Mobile ... is to provide a terrestrial-like connectivity when you're connected to the satellite system," Michael Nicolls, SpaceX's senior vice president of Starlink engineering, said during the MWC keynote. "In the right conditions, it should look and feel like you're connected to a high-performing 5G terrestrial network."
Nicolls detailed that the V2 satellite constellation could offer download speeds up to 150 Mbps in ideal conditions, comparing it to a broadband experience. According to Starlink, next-gen satellites will offer 100 times the data density of its predecessors, which should help users with faster streaming and browsing as well as more reliable voice calls. Notably, Nicolls added that the V2 satellite constellation would offer better coverage to Earth's polar regions, which are known to have unreliable coverage with traditional networks.
Nicolls said that SpaceX is planning to send out more than 50 V2 satellites on each SpaceX launch starting in mid-2027, with a goal of building out a full constellation in six months. Outside its MWC presser, Starlink also announced a partnership with German telecommunications company Deutsche Telekom. The partnership would help Deutsche Telekom address internet coverage gaps in Europe using Starlink's constellation, starting in 2028.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/science/space/starlinks-next-gen-satellite-network-could-provide-150-mbps-speeds-by-end-of-next-year-192118368.html?src=rss
X is rolling out a built-in “Paid Partnership” label that creators can apply to sponsored posts, replacing the hashtag workarounds they’ve had to rely on until now. The feature, announced by the platform’s head of product Nikita Bier, adds a toggle that places a disclosure label directly below a post’s content. It can also be applied retroactively.
The label is meant to help creators comply with years-old FTC regulations requiring clear disclosure of sponsored content. The agency sent out letters reminding influencers about this requirement in 2017, and Instagram added a disclosure feature that same year. Without a native tool, X creators had been left to use hashtags like #ad and #paidpartnership.
X has been trying to court creators for some time with tools like ad-revenue sharing and creator subscriptions, but the platform still struggles with major image issues following a string of scandals like Grok creating CSAM. The Elon Musk-owned platform is under investigation both domestically and abroad for the AI agent’s behavior.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/x-adds-paid-partnership-labels-so-users-can-more-easily-identify-ads-183528227.html?src=rss
The iPad Air, the middle child in Apple’s tablet lineup, has been upgraded to the M4 chip with increased RAM and… Well, there’s not a whole lot else if I’m being honest. At the very least, the new iPad Air M4 models remain at the same price as the iPad Air M3, with the 11-inch version starting at $599 and the 13-inch at $799. I would give Apple more credit if it had increased the starting storage or added literally anything else.
If you put them side by side, you might not be able to tell the difference, but this upgrade would benefit creatives and professionals more than anything. There’s a significant performance bump from the M3 to the M4, and the increased RAM is doing a lot of work, especially if you’re taking advantage of Apple Intelligence.
If you’re using an M1-powered iPad Air or something even older, though, the new iPad Air M4 should be a compelling upgrade. Pre-orders start at 9:15AM ET on March 4, with the units arriving a week later. We expect full reviews will be published by then. But in the meantime, let’s dive into what the performance gains might look like and what we’re missing out on in this year’s iteration of the iPad Air.
iPad Air M4 vs. iPad Air M3: Performance and battery life
The most significant difference between the two iPad Air generations is their chipsets. The latest iPad Air launches with the M4 chip versus its predecessor’s M3 chip, and it gets a bump in RAM from 8GB to 12GB.
I don’t give much fanfare to incremental chip increases because the performance gain is usually minimal. However, the M4 is up to 30 percent faster than the M3, according to Apple. That might be noticeable to even casual users, especially as the years go on and iPadOS becomes more demanding. For power users, it’ll mean more demanding work like video editing will be noticeably quicker.
For those in need of the fastest internet speeds, the new iPad Air is also equipped with Apple’s N1 chip, which enables Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6, the latest connectivity technology. However, I really don’t imagine the average user needing up to 46 gigabits per second of internet speed compared to the iPad M3’s 9.6 Gbps on Wi-Fi 6. If you do, you’re in the tax bracket for an iPad Pro.
Now, despite the increase in speeds, the battery life between the M4 and M3 models remains the same. Apple claims all four models get up to 10 hours of battery life surfing the web on Wi-Fi or watching video (up to 9 hours on cellular). No complaints here.
iPad Air M4 vs. iPad Air M3: Design, display, audio and cameras
For better or worse, we’re not getting any changes in any of these departments, which is why I’m lumping them together.
The iPad Air comes in blue, purple, beige and gray. The 11-inch option measures 9.74 x 7.02 x 0.24 inches and the 13 comes in at 11.04 x 8.46 x 0.24 inches. As their names suggest, they’re both rather light, at 1.01 pounds (1.02 pounds for M4) and 1.36 pounds, respectively. My only wish was that we got new colors that popped a bit more.
Then there’s the displays. All four versions of the iPad Airs sport a Liquid Retina LED display at 264 ppi. The 11-inch supports a 2,360 x 1,640 resolution with a peak brightness of 500 nits, while the 13-inch offers a 2,732 x 2,048 resolution at 600 nits. It would’ve been nice to see an OLED or even Mini-LED panel make its way to the iPad Air, which could’ve made the screen more vivid and vibrant. But it’s more disappointing that we’re stuck at 60Hz unlike the Pro models that offer 120Hz, making their visual experience smoother.
Both products feature landscape stereo speakers. The iPad Air M3’s audio quality couldn’t live up to the iPad Pro, so I doubt the M4 model will.
You won’t catch me taking photos with an iPad, but for those of you who do, the iPad Air M4 features the same 12MP cameras on the front and back as its predecessor.
iPadOS 26, Apple Intelligence and Apple accessories
Nothing huge is happening to iPadOS or the Apple accessories in the iPad Air refresh. The revamped Magic Keyboard from last year still works with these new models, as does the Apple Pencil Pro. iPadOS 26, released last fall, was a major update but will still be familiar enough to anyone who has used an iPad before. The new iPad Air M4 is getting a significant boost in AI processing speeds, though, thanks to its new chip and 50 percent increase in RAM. However, unless you’re an AI power user, you probably won’t notice a difference there.
All that said, if your love language is spreadsheets, the full specs are helpfully laid out below:
iPad Air M4 vs. iPad Air M3: Specs at a glance
Spec
iPad Air M4
iPad Air M3
Price
$599 (11-inch), $799 (13-inch)
$599 (11-inch), $799 (13-inch)
Processor
M4
M3
Display
11-inch: Liquid Retina, 2,360 x 1,640, LED display at 264 ppi
13-inch: Liquid Retina, 2,732 x 2,048, LED display at 264 ppi
11-inch: Liquid Retina, 2,360 x 1,640, LED display at 264 ppi
13-inch: Liquid Retina, 2,732 x 2,048, LED display at 264 ppi
RAM
12GB
8GB
Storage
128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Battery
Up to 10 hours (Wi-Fi), 9 hours (Cellular model)
Up to 10 hours (Wi-Fi), 9 hours (Cellular model)
Cameras
12MP Wide (rear), 12MP Center Stage (front)
12MP Wide (rear), 12MP Center Stage (front)
Apple accessories
Apple Pencil Pro, Apple Pencil, Magic Keyboard Folio
Apple Pencil Pro, Apple Pencil, Magic Keyboard Folio
Dimensions
11-inch: 9.74 x 7.02 x 0.24 inches
13-inch: 11.04 x 8.46 x 0.24 inches
11-inch: 9.74 x 7.02 x 0.24 inches
13-inch: 11.04 x 8.46 x 0.24 inches
Weight
11-inch: 1.02 pounds
13-inch: 1.36 pounds
11-inch: 1.01 pounds
13-inch: 1.36 pounds
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/tablets/ipad-air-m4-vs-ipad-air-m3-the-few-new-things-in-apples-midrange-tablet-182701520.html?src=rss
The Analogue Pocket handheld retro console has proven to be extremely popular, as initial runs have sold out. The company just announced the system will be back in stock this week, along with the dock accessory. Preorders open up on March 4 at 11AM ET, with shipments going out this June.
Analogue Pocket & Analogue Dock - restock.
A tribute to portable gaming. Out of the box, Pocket is compatible with the 2,780+ Game Boy, Game Boy Color & Game Boy Advance game cartridge library and more.
That's the good news. The bad news? The little console is getting slapped with a price increase. It's shooting up to $240 from the recent price of $220, with the company placing the blame squarely on President Trump's neverending tariffs. The device is assembled in China and Trump just hit the region with even more tariffs after the Supreme Court struck down the old ones. We love to suddenly pay more for gadgets that have been out in the wild for nearly six years, don't we folks?
For the uninitiated, the Pocket isn't an emulation machine. It plays actual Game Boy, Game Boy Color and Game Boy Advance cartridges. It also integrates with various Game Boy accessories, like the camera and printer. The console can even handle Game Gear, TurboGrafx-16 and Atari Lynx games, but those require separate adapters.
We praised the Analogue Pocket in our official review, calling it "a clever little thing" that is sure to light up the nostalgia center of your brain. It even made our list of the best handheld consoles, which is notable given competition included stuff like the Steam Deck.
In any event, this drop will likely sell out quickly. We recommend parking a browser on the company website just prior to 11AM ET if you can stomach the new price.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/the-analogue-pocket-will-be-back-in-stock-this-week-but-theres-a-tariff-related-price-increase-182226016.html?src=rss
Xiaomi has just entered the Gran Turismo world with its Vision Gran Turismo (VGT) concept car at Mobile World Congress 2026. This electric hypercar follows the reveal of the SU7 Ultra supercar that was developed last time around. This year’s event saw the hypercar, which Xiaomi claims is sculpted by the wind. The idea is to make the performance vehicle aerodynamically tuned with airflow channels and moving parts to achieve optimal efficiency. We got our first glimpse of the hypercar at Mobile World Congress, and it does impress on the outside and inside.
This is the first-ever Chinese Gran Turismo performance racer to be materialized, and the air flow obsession goes beyond everything you would imagine. Although one cannot drive it for real anytime soon, you can explore the two-door performance car in Gran Turismo 7, using the company’s dedicated simulator with exact racing seats as the concept car. With the VGT hypercar, Xiaomi joins an elite list of automakers like Porsche, Ferrari, and Mercedes-Benz that have their futuristic concept cars designed for Gran Turismo.
Given it is a concept, the technical aspects are wild – there’s a 900V Silicon Carbide (SiC) platform which ultimately delivers 1,900 horsepower. To handle that amount of power at high speeds, the car gets advanced components, including carbon-ceramic brakes and center-lock wheels. The two-door hypercar has a very linear profile with a very low ride height and only the cabin’s teardrop-shaped cockpit, with only the encapsulating bubble disrupting the aerodynamic performance. The shark-fin roofline architecture balances out things, though.
VGT has wheel covers that are magnetically attached (a.k.a. Accretion Rims) so that they don’t rotate when the car moves forward, reducing drag. The halo-style taillights are straight out of the TRON universe as they also double as an air outlet for aerodynamic performance, along with the large rear diffuser, which levels up the futuristic appeal. All this aerodynamic engineering results in a drag coefficient of 0.29 and downforce of -1.2.
On the inside, Vision GT is a nest of tech-laden comfort and luxury. It has a cocooned Sofa Racer cabin, which holistically blends the dashboard, seats, and the scissor doors into one. The butterfly steering wheel is designed for maximum driver precision, and the overlaying display has a panoramic screen and the Xiaomi Pulse system that utilizes light and sound for interaction. The central console on the two-seater GT has physical button controls, a circular pointer knob, and a shifter mostly seen on an aircraft throttle.
Since this hypercar is a top-of-the-line creation by the Chinese tech giant, it seamlessly integrates the in-house Human x Car x Home ecosystem for a personalized experience depending on the rider’s mood and current state of mind. Although the Vision Gran Turismo is only a virtual hypercar that you may not drive in the real world, it shows Xiaomi’s growing confidence in the highly technical automotive world. If those horsepower figures are true, the hypercar could be one of the most powerful Gran Turismo creations, overshadowing the likes of Ferrari, which churns out 1,337 hp.
For racing fanatics who want to experience the VGT in a virtual world, it’ll soon be available in Gran Turismo 7, and Xiaomi’s dedicated driving simulator for a more immersive experience.
As AI-generated artwork becomes more commonplace, it still won't be able to be copyrighted, according to US courts. On Monday, the US Supreme Court declined to hear a case about whether an artwork generated with the help of AI can be copyrighted. The refusal means that a lower court's decision to reject the copyright request will stand.
The case dates back to 2018 when Stephen Thaler applied for a copyright of an artwork called A Recent Entrance to Paradise. Unlike using ChatGPT or Midjourney, Thaler, a computer scientist, created an AI system that generated the artwork in question. However, the US Copyright Office rejected his application in 2022 on the grounds that it wasn't made by a human author. Thaler sought appeals at higher courts, but ultimately had to escalate the case to the Supreme Court after both a federal judge in Washington and the US Court of Appeals ruled against him.
With a refusal from the highest court in the US, it's unlikely Thaler's case can continue. The US Supreme Court could always hear a related case in the future, but Thaler's lawyers said, "even if it later overturns the Copyright Office’s test in another case, it will be too late," adding that the decision will have negatively impacted the creative industry during "critically important years." It's worth noting that Thaler also filed applications to the US Patent and Trademark Office for AI-generated inventions, which were rejected for similar reasons.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/the-supreme-court-doesnt-care-if-you-want-to-copyright-your-ai-generated-art-171849407.html?src=rss
Nintendo has scheduled an Indie World Showcase livestream for tomorrow, March 3, at 9AM ET. The company says this event will include "roughly 15 minutes of news and updates on indie games coming to Nintendo Switch 2 and Nintendo Switch." That's not a whole lot of time, but indie trailers tend to be on the shorter side.
We really don't know anything about what Nintendo and its partners could reveal tomorrow. It's entirely possible we'll see something big, like the previously announced Sea of Sorrow DLC for Silksong. More than likely, however, we'll get trailers and updates regarding a spate of unexpected indie games.
The previous Indie World Showcase took place in August and it gave us trailers and announcements for stuff like the excellent Ball x Pit and the upcoming Mina the Hollower. To that last one, Yacht Club Games said it would be launching the title for consoles this spring so we could get a release date announcement tomorrow.
Scott Pilgrim EXwill be available for download tomorrow, so a launch trailer is almost certain. This is a new side-scrolling fighter with four-player co-op and music by Anamanaguchi. My personal white whale is Witchbrook, the long-gestating life-sim set in a magical school. It's being published by Chucklefish, the company that originally published Stardew Valley.
There's some stuff we absolutely shouldn't expect. This is an Indie World Showcase, and not a Nintendo Direct. There will likely be no appearances by Mario or Zelda, unless a character pops up in an indie game as DLC or something. The stream is also unlikely to spotlight Pokémon Pokopia, despite the life-sim launching on March 5.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/nintendo/nintendo-just-announced-an-indie-world-showcase-for-tomorrow-at-9am-et-164706666.html?src=rss
Paramount Skydance plans to combine Paramount+ and HBO Max into a single streaming service following the completion of its merger with Warner Bros. Discovery. CEO David Ellison confirmed the plan on an investor call Monday, saying the combined platform would serve over 200 million subscribers and position the company to compete with the biggest players in the streaming space.
“We think the combined offering, and given the amount of content and what we can do from the tech side, really will put us in a position to be able to compete with the most scaled players in DTC,” Ellison said. It’s not yet clear whether the app’s two libraries will be fully integrated, or whether one will exist as a standalone service within the other. Ellison signaled that the HBO brand will “operate with independence” during the call.
Also unclear is what the newly combined app would cost subscribers. The last year has seen nearly across-the-board increases in the cost of streaming services, including HBO Max.
The planned merger would unite Paramount’s CBS, MTV, Comedy Central and BET with Warner’s CNN, HBO, TNT and Food Network, along with franchises including Game of Thrones, Mission: Impossible, the DC Universe and SpongeBob SquarePants under one roof. The combined entity is expected to carry roughly $79 billion in net debt, according to Reuters, and could be considered the largest leveraged buyout in history. The deal is expected to close in the back half of 2026, pending regulatory approval.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/streaming/paramount-and-hbo-max-could-be-merging-into-a-single-streaming-service-163439653.html?src=rss
Most portable speakers end up on a shelf somewhere, playing lo-fi beats while someone makes coffee. There is nothing wrong with that, but it is not what these five were made for. We picked speakers that actually want to leave the house, products built around weather resistance, battery stamina, and the kind of design thinking that considers mud, rain, and a campfire playlist as standard operating conditions. Spring 2026 has delivered some interesting options, from retro survival radios to subwoofer-equipped tanks that laugh at puddles.
What makes this list different from the usual roundup is the lens we are looking through. These are not ranked by loudness or spec-sheet one-upmanship. We looked at form factor, material durability, portability logic, and whether each speaker solves a real outdoor problem or just pretends to with an IP rating sticker. Some are brand new releases, others are designs that aged into relevance this season. All five belong outside.
1. RetroWave 7-in-1 Radio
Emergency radios tend to look like emergency radios: bulky, utilitarian, designed to sit in a basement kit next to expired granola bars. The RetroWave wraps seven functions inside a form factor borrowed from mid-century Japanese transistor radios, with a tactile tuning dial and a design warm enough to earn kitchen counter space. Those seven functions: Bluetooth speaker, MP3 player (USB and microSD), AM/FM/shortwave radio, flashlight, clock, SOS alarm, and power bank. Hand-crank charging and a solar panel provide off-grid power when outlets vanish, a capability no Bluetooth-only speaker on this list can match.
The outdoor logic differs from the rest of this roundup. The RetroWave competes on self-sufficiency, not audio fidelity. A hand crank and solar panel mean it never truly dies. The flashlight and SOS siren add safety utility for trail emergencies. Bluetooth and MP3 playback handle entertainment with respectable sound for a multi-function device, though the tuning-dial analog radio experience is where the personality lives. Shortwave reception opens up international broadcasts and emergency channels that streaming apps cannot access. As an everyday speaker, it has charm. As an emergency tool that also plays music, it is hard to argue against keeping one in a daypack. It belongs on this list not because it sounds the best, but because it is the only speaker here that could keep working days after every other device has gone dark.
Hand-crank and solar charging make it the only speaker here that generates its own power, a genuine survival feature for off-grid situations.
Seven functions (speaker, radio, flashlight, clock, SOS alarm, MP3 player, power bank) consolidate multiple pieces of outdoor gear into one device.
What we dislike
Audio quality does not match dedicated Bluetooth speakers on this list, as the multi-function design compromises driver space and tuning.
The retro aesthetic, while appealing, may feel out of place for users who prefer minimal, modern gear in their outdoor kits.
2. Marshall Emberton III
The Emberton III wraps textured silicone and metal grille construction around meaningful upgrades over its predecessors. Two 2-inch full-range drivers and two passive radiators push 360-degree sound through Marshall’s True Stereophonic system, so placement on a picnic blanket or backpack strap matters less than it would with front-firing alternatives. An IP67 rating allows submersion in one meter of water for 30 minutes, and the 32+ hours of battery life cover an entire weekend trip without an outlet. A 20-minute quick charge returns six hours of playback, the kind of math that matters when departure is in half an hour, and the speaker is dead.
Bluetooth 5.3 with LE Audio readiness and upcoming Auracast support means multi-speaker setups are on the horizon. A built-in microphone, absent from earlier Embertons, handles hands-free calls. The signature brass control knob manages volume, track skipping, and play/pause with tactile precision that wet or gloved hands appreciate far more than a touchscreen. At $159, it sits in a competitive zone against the Sonos Roam 2 and JBL Flip 6, but neither offers this battery endurance. Marshall’s sound leans warm and full at moderate volumes, though pushing past 85% introduces harshness common to speakers this size.
What we like
32+ hours of battery life covers multi-day trips, and the 20-minute quick charge for six hours of playback is a practical safety net.
IP67 rating handles submersion, dust, and sand, making it one of the most weather-resistant speakers at this price.
What we dislike
Sound gets harsh at very high volumes, a physical limitation of the small driver size that DSP tuning cannot fully solve.
No 3.5mm auxiliary input means Bluetooth is the only connection option, eliminating wired backup for devices with dead wireless.
3. Brane X
Most portable speakers fake bass by boosting mid-bass frequencies and letting psychoacoustics fill the gaps. Brane X uses a proprietary Repel-Attract Driver (RAD) that cancels internal air pressure forces, producing real sub-bass down to 27.1 Hz from a speaker just 9.3 inches wide. Five drivers total, including a 6.5 x 9-inch RAD subwoofer, two midrange drivers, and two dome tweeters, are powered by four class-D amplifiers exceeding 200 watts combined. A 72 watt-hour battery provides up to 12 hours of runtime, and full IP57 waterproofing means rain and poolside splashes are non-issues.
Outdoors, the five-driver array creates a soundstage that holds up when listeners spread across a campsite or patio. A custom DSP engine runs 500 million EQ calculations per second, maintaining clarity at volumes where competitors distort. Wi-Fi adds Spotify Connect and SiriusXM streaming, Alexa handles voice control, and the Brane app offers custom EQ and grouping for up to eight speakers. At 7.7 pounds, it is heavier than pocket alternatives, but the acoustic payoff justifies the weight for anyone tired of thin, tinny campsite sound. A 3.5mm auxiliary port also accommodates turntables, a rare inclusion in the wireless-first portable category.
What we like
Bass response down to 27.1 Hz from a portable form factor is a genuine engineering achievement unmatched in this size class.
IP57 waterproofing combined with 200+ watts of amplification delivers serious sound in weather that would sideline most premium speakers.
What we dislike
7.7 pounds limits grab-and-go spontaneity for hiking or cycling trips compared to sub-2-pound alternatives.
Battery tops out at 12 hours at moderate volume, less than half of what the Emberton III offers on a single charge.
4. The Harman Kardon Traveller Concept
The Traveller rethinks what a portable speaker should look like for people who actually travel with one. The form factor draws from Sony point-and-shoot cameras, producing a slab so slim it fits alongside a passport wallet. Touch controls and LED indicators sit on top, maintaining the clean design language of the Harman Kardon Esquire Mini 2. A high-density battery delivers up to 10 hours of playback, and reverse charge functionality turns the speaker into an emergency power bank when a connected phone dies mid-hike. Dual microphones with echo and noise cancellation handle calls in windy outdoor conditions.
The outdoor advantage here is not ruggedness but presence. The slimmest speaker is useless if it stays home because packing it is inconvenient. The Traveller solves that by occupying almost no space, fitting into a carry pouch alongside chargers and cables. Three planned colorways (black, silver, electric blue) suggest a product designed to be seen, not hidden. Sound quality carries the Harman Kardon name, though the slim profile necessarily limits low-end output compared to thicker options on this list. For backpackers and frequent flyers who treat portability as the primary feature, this concept points toward a smarter kind of outdoor speaker: one designed to be forgotten in the bag until needed.
What we like
Reverse charge functionality doubles the speaker as an emergency power bank, solving two travel problems with one device.
Ultra-slim form factor fits in jacket pockets and travel pouches, the most packable option on this list by a wide margin.
What we dislike
This is a concept design, not a production product, so availability and final specs remain unconfirmed.
Slim profile inherently limits bass depth and volume ceiling compared to thicker, driver-stacked competitors.
5. Side A Cassette Speaker
Somewhere between a novelty gift and a legitimate audio device, the Side A leans closer to legitimate than the shape suggests. Styled after a real mixtape with a transparent shell and a Side A label, it hides a Bluetooth 5.3 speaker inside a back-pocket form factor. The cassette shape forced designers to tune for warm, analog-flavored sound within the tightest enclosure possible, and the result has a cozy quality that bigger, flatter-response speakers do not replicate. MicroSD support adds offline MP3 playback, useful on trails where phone battery conservation matters more than streaming. A clear case doubles as a display stand for desk use indoors.
Outdoors, the Side A works best as a personal-zone speaker. It will not fill a campsite, but clipped to a bag or perched on a rock beside a hammock, it handles solo listening and small-circle hangouts without the bulk of a larger unit. Bluetooth 5.3 delivers stable pairing, and range holds reliably when a phone is in a tent and the speaker is by the fire. At sub-$50, it is a low-risk purchase and an easy gift for anyone nostalgic about cassette culture. The trade-off is clear: do not expect room-filling volume or chest-thumping bass. This is a speaker for people who value character and portability over raw performance, and within that lane, it delivers more than the price suggests.
Bluetooth 5.3 and microSD playback cover both streaming and offline listening, handling connectivity gaps common on outdoor trips.
Pocket-sized cassette form factor weighs almost nothing, lowering the barrier to actually bringing a speaker on every outing.
What we dislike
Volume and bass are physically limited by the tiny enclosure, making it unsuitable for group listening in open spaces.
MicroSD support handles MP3 files only, excluding FLAC, WAV, and other formats that audio-conscious users may prefer.
Where spring leaves us
These five speakers share one trait that separates them from the hundreds of Bluetooth speakers released every quarter: they were designed with an awareness that speakers leave houses. That sounds obvious, but most portable speaker design still optimizes for countertops and nightstands, treating water resistance and battery life as checkbox features rather than core design drivers.
The Emberton III and Brane X represent two ends of the outdoor audio spectrum, one betting on endurance, the other on acoustic performance that refuses to compromise because the ceiling is sky instead of drywall. The Traveller and Side A cassette challenge the assumption that outdoor speakers need to be chunky, proving slimness and personality coexist with genuine trail usefulness. And the RetroWave reminds us that the most capable outdoor device might be the one that never needs charging at all. Spring is for getting outside. These are the speakers who want to come along.
Apple’s most affordable iPhone just got an upgrade, but how does the new iPhone 17e compare to the iPhone 16e? Well, thankfully the price remains the same at $599, which is good news in our current economic climate. An immediate difference you might notice is that one of them now comes in a third color: pink. That’s at least one win for me because I am all for putting more color into tech.
There are a few differences under the hood as well, namely that the iPhone 17e is arriving with the A19 chip and double the storage. We’ve already seen what’s possible with an A19 chip in the standard iPhone 17 — it’s not a super exciting upgrade, but it is a boost nonetheless.
Pre-orders start at 9:15AM ET on March 4, and while we work on a full review, let’s take a deeper dive into what has changed on this year’s model and what that might mean in the real world.
iPhone 17e vs. iPhone 16e: Design and display
Of course, the biggest difference in the design for the iPhone 17e is the shiny new pink color. I’ve long complained about how many major tech companies stick to the safety of black, white or gray colorways. Thankfully, the iPhone 17e’s pink hue is a departure from that approach. It’s also an understated shade that’s elegant, compared to the typically brighter and louder tones reserved for cheap(er) phones.
Both the iPhone 17e and iPhone 16e measure 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.31 inches. However, the iPhone 17e did get a bit heavier at 5.96 ounces compared to the iPhone 16e’s 5.88 ounces. It’s very unlikely you’ll notice the 0.08 ounce difference, though. (And if you do, you have a gift.)
In terms of durability, the iPhone 17e is outfitted with Ceramic Shield 2, which is a glass face that Apple said is three times more scratch-resistant than the iPhone 16e’s original Ceramic Shield. Ideally, it’ll survive falls to the ground (within reason) and spare you a scratched up display from casual wear and tear.
There doesn’t seem to be any change in the display — whether that be in its brightness or color rendering capability — but that isn’t too shocking. Both the iPhone 17e and iPhone 16e feature a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED panel with a 1,200-nit peak brightness. That’s bright enough to combat the ambient glare from the sun, so you should be able to read it outside relatively easily. They’re also specced out with a 2,532 x 1,170 resolution at 460 ppi — meaning text and lines will be clean and sharp.
iPhone 17e vs. iPhone 16e: Cameras
I didn’t expect a huge bump in camera technology, especially if Apple intended to keep the price the same. We’ve got upgrades in other categories for sure, but it would’ve been nice to see an extra camera on the back. Like the iPhone 16e, the iPhone 17e is kitted out with Apple’s 48-megapixel Fusion 2-in-1 camera with a 12MP 2x Telephoto setting. You also get digital zoom up to 10x. Take a look at our iPhone 16e review to see exactly what that looks like in practice, but to sum up our experience: it’s solid.
There’s a great level of detail and vibrancy, but like I said, it’s limited. Without a potential ultrawide camera, you cannot capture as much of your surroundings because you’re not getting that 0.5x zoom option.
One major upgrade, however, is that the iPhone 17e is now capable of recognizing dogs and cats in Portrait mode. It also saves depth information so you can turn regularly captured photos into portraits after the fact. This might be a noteworthy upgrade, considering the iPhone 16e struggled in Portrait mode, incapable of capturing non-human faces and objects.
There’s also the 12MP TrueDepth camera on the front, which we didn’t have many complaints about, and don’t expect to disappoint on the iPhone 17e.
iPhone 17e vs. iPhone 16e: Processor, battery life and charging
Apart from the color, the biggest differences between the iPhone 17e and iPhone 16e is their starting storage and overall performance. The new iPhone is packed with an A19 chip, while the latter comes with an A18 chip.
Yes, you’re getting a performance bump with the A19 chip, but casual users are unlikely to feel the difference. If you’re a power user trying to get the most out of an affordable iPhone and want to get crunchy about it, there’s roughly a 5 percent difference in CPU speed and over 10 percent in GPU performance (according to CPU Monkey).
Despite that bump, the battery life hasn’t changed. With both devices, Apple says you’re getting up to 26 hours of video playback and up to 21 hours streamed. The company doesn’t typically share specifics on battery sizes, but GSMArena is reporting that both models come with a 4,005mAh battery. What has changed, however, is being able to receive double the wattage from wireless charging. The iPhone 17e can now take up to 15W for Qi2 fast wireless charging — compared to 7.5W from the Qi support on the iPhone 16e.
iOS 26 and Apple Intelligence
At a glance, there does not seem to be any difference in what the iPhone 16e and iPhone 17e offer in terms of iOS and Apple Intelligence capability. However, it’s relevant to note that you will likely get better performance out of the iPhone 17e with regards to AI features because of its superior A19 chip.
In case you wanted to do the numbers comparison yourself, we’ve compiled a nifty table here so you can eyeball them with ease. But for a sense of how the iPhone 17e holds up in the real world and whether it’s worth the money, stay tuned for our full review.
iPhone 17e vs. iPhone 16e: Specs at a glance
Spec
iPhone 17e
iPhone 16e
Price
$599
$599
Processor
A19 chip
A18 chip
Display
Super Retina XDR, 6.1‑inch, 2,532 x 1,170, OLED display at 460 ppi
Super Retina XDR, 6.1‑inch, 2,532 x 1,170, OLED display at 460 ppi
RAM
8GB
8GB
Storage
256GB, 512GB
128GB, 256GB, 512GB
Wireless charging
Up to 15W
Up to 7.5W
Rear camera
2-in-1 camera — 48MP Fusion main, 12MP 2x Telephoto, digital zoom up to 10x
2-in-1 camera — 48MP Fusion main, 12MP 2x Telephoto, digital zoom up to 10x
Front camera
12MP selfie cam
12MP selfie cam
SIM
Dual SIM (two active eSIMs)
Dual SIM (two active eSIMs)
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth v5.3, NFC
Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth v5.3, NFC
OS
Launched with iOS 26
Launched with iOS 18
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/iphone-17e-vs-iphone-16e-whats-new-on-apples-latest-599-handset-162009364.html?src=rss
