A 1930s French Cabin Brought Back the Pit, and It’s the Best Part

If you grew up watching old movies or flipping through your parents’ architecture magazines from the 70s, you probably remember the conversation pit. That sunken, circular seating area built into the floor, ringed with cushions, usually occupied by someone in a turtleneck holding a glass of wine. It felt like the most optimistic design idea of its era: a room within a room, purpose-built for the act of simply talking to each other. Then open-plan living came along and flattened everything, and the pit more or less disappeared.

Studio Razavi just brought it back, and they did it in about the best possible setting you could imagine. The Paris, London, and New York-based firm recently completed Seaside House, a renovation of a 1930s coastal cabin at the tip of Cap Ferret, a narrow peninsula near Bordeaux, France. The structure sits nestled among towering pine trees, which is already a lot for any building to live up to. But the interior is where things get quietly radical.

Designer: Studio Razavi

All of the cabin’s original partition walls were stripped out entirely, leaving just the building’s envelope standing. In the center of what became one long, open living space, the architects placed a circle. A sunken circular living room, specifically, with a low perimeter wall that integrates the kitchen sink and storage on one side, and steps leading down into the seating area on the other. Two decked terraces bookend the space, one on each facade of the house.

Project architects Guillen Berniolles and Michele Sacchi described it as a direct response to the local lifestyle around Cap Ferret, where people are constantly moving between indoors and outdoors. “The local lifestyle revolves around constantly moving in and out of houses, which led us to opt for a centrally sunken living room that creates a circulation flow all around,” they told Dezeen. The pit, in other words, isn’t just decorative. It gives the house its entire traffic pattern.

That reasoning matters because it pushes back against the way we usually justify bold design choices. We tend to dress them up in language about “flow” and “intention,” which often means nothing. Here, the logic is actually grounded in how real people use a real place. You come in from the terrace, the circle pulls you in, and then you drift out the other side. It’s a house that choreographs you without you noticing, and that kind of invisible architecture is genuinely hard to pull off.

The material choices are just as considered. Solid wood furniture and veneer are used throughout as a nod to the surrounding Landes forest, which is not only France’s largest but also Europe’s most extensive man-made forest. That context matters. A coastal house in Cap Ferret sits at the intersection of sea and forest, and the design doesn’t pretend otherwise. It leans into both, which gives the whole renovation a rootedness you don’t always see in coastal homes.

A separate guest annexe, clad in dark timber, sits to the west of the main cabin, blending quietly into the tree trunks around it. It’s the kind of restrained detail that separates a thoughtful renovation from a merely stylish one.

The conversation pit feels timely for a reason that goes beyond nostalgia. We spend so much time designing spaces for productivity, for content, for function, that a space designed specifically for conversation feels almost radical now. A sunken circle in a beach house that says, essentially, sit here and talk to each other, is a quiet but pointed statement. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that it lands now.

Studio Razavi has always been good at finding the architectural move that feels both inevitable and completely unexpected once you see it. Seaside House is that in full. The shell stayed. Everything else became about the circle at the center of it, and somehow, that’s more than enough.

The post A 1930s French Cabin Brought Back the Pit, and It’s the Best Part first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Sideboard That Started as Lines That Never Finished

Most great furniture doesn’t start with a grand vision. It starts with a sketch, usually a messy one, the kind you draw absentmindedly while thinking about something else entirely. Designer Deniz Aktay knows this. His latest piece, the Shift Sideboard, is proof that an unfinished line can sometimes carry more intention than a polished one.

The concept is deceptively simple. Aktay began with a sketch of shifted, incomplete lines, the kind of drawing that would normally get torn out and tossed. But he saw something worth keeping in that incompleteness: a structural idea where two horizontal planes don’t fully align, each one sliding past the other, leaving gaps and openings that feel both accidental and entirely deliberate. That tension between intentional and incidental is what makes the Shift so visually compelling.

Designer: Deniz Aktay

Looking at it from the front, the sideboard reads almost like a typographic letterform. The upper shelf sits shorter, pulled to one side, while the lower platform stretches past it in the opposite direction. The result is a silhouette that feels like it’s mid-motion, caught between two states. It doesn’t try to be symmetrical, and that’s exactly why it works. Symmetry in furniture is safe. This is not that.

From a practical standpoint, those offset gaps aren’t just aesthetic choices. They translate into genuinely useful storage zones. Books stand upright in the open left compartment without needing bookends. A phone charges through a slot in the side wall, with the cable routed out cleanly through the offset gap at the edge, no cable box, no ugly workaround, no strip of tape pretending the cord isn’t there. For anyone who has ever stared at a tangled mess of cables on a media console and felt low-level irritation about it, this is the kind of thoughtful detail that earns real appreciation.

The material choice reinforces the whole mood of the piece. The warm, pale oak tones photograph beautifully against neutral backgrounds, and I imagine they read even better in a real room. There’s a quietness to it. The grain runs consistently across every surface, and the joinery is clean without being precious. It doesn’t have the cold austerity that some minimalist furniture falls into, the kind where you’re afraid to actually put anything on it. The Shift looks like it wants to be used, which is actually a harder thing to achieve than it sounds.

Aktay has been building a following for this kind of work for a while now, and he’s clearly found an audience that’s hungry for furniture that sits somewhere between concept and craft, pieces that look like they belong in a gallery but function like they belong in a home. His earlier work already hinted at this ability to make structure feel expressive without becoming theatrical. The Shift continues in that direction, but with more restraint. It feels more resolved.

My personal read on it: furniture that earns attention through subtlety is almost always more interesting than furniture that shouts. The Shift doesn’t need to be dramatic. The offset lines do the work quietly, and you keep noticing new things about it the longer you look. The way the shadow falls differently on each side. The way the open compartment frames whatever you put inside it. The way the cable route makes a modern inconvenience feel like it was part of the design from the beginning, because it was.

That last part matters more than it gets credit for. Cable management is often an afterthought, tacked on at the end of a design process with a grommeted hole and a prayer. Building it into the structure itself, as a consequence of the form rather than a patch over it, is the kind of decision that separates a design exercise from something you’d actually want to live with. The Shift Sideboard started as an unfinished sketch. Right now, at least conceptually, it feels very finished indeed.

The post The Sideboard That Started as Lines That Never Finished first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Ping Pong Tables at This French School Have No Rules

Most of us learned to play ping pong the same way: flat table, net in the middle, bounce, smash, repeat. The rules were never really up for debate. You either knew them or you didn’t, and the table gave you very little room to imagine doing things differently. That’s exactly the kind of thinking French architecture studio Exercice decided to challenge.

Their project, called Ping Pong Park, recently landed at a high school in Ingré, France, and it is not your standard schoolyard furniture. Exercice installed four table tennis tables on the school grounds, each one looking like it wandered out of an art gallery and accidentally became a playground fixture. They were designed to make children question the rules, experiment with play, and figure out how the game works for them, not for a referee.

Designer: Exercise

The four tables each have a distinct character. The Rebound table has raised sides that expand the playing surface vertically, so the ball doesn’t just travel across the table. It can careen off walls you didn’t anticipate. Every rally becomes a small physics experiment. The Golf table narrows at the centre and features holes on either side that can count as a winning point or a foul, depending entirely on what players decide before the match starts. Even the geometry pushes you toward longer, more strategic shots. Then there’s the Rotating table, which is circular and designed for tournante, the French schoolyard favourite where multiple players run around the table taking turns hitting the ball. The round shape accommodates up to six or seven players and keeps everyone moving, which means the social energy is essentially designed into the form.

Exercice describes these as “social sculptures: accessible, participatory and constantly evolving through collective appropriation.” That’s a mouthful, but it’s also kind of perfect. The tables aren’t static objects kids use and then forget. They change meaning every time a new group decides what the rules are going to be that afternoon. One day the holes in the Golf table are winning points. The next, they’re instant fouls. The table is genuinely indifferent either way, and that neutrality is the whole idea.

I love this approach because it trusts kids to be more interesting than we usually give them credit for. The whole premise assumes that children are capable of designing their own experience if you give them the right starting point. A regulation ping pong table says: here are the rules, now compete. The Ping Pong Park tables say: here’s a surface, now figure it out. That’s a subtle but genuinely different message about what play is for, and what sports equipment is really supposed to do.

The design itself holds up visually, which matters more than it might seem. The tables are made from galvanised steel and high-pressure laminate, built to survive daily use, not just an exhibition. They have clean, confident shapes that could hold their own as standalone sculptures in a public space. Exercice has framed them that way deliberately, noting that each table has a “distinctive aesthetic identity” that allows it to function as an autonomous artwork. The fact that they’re also durable enough for a schoolyard is the point. Art that only survives gallery conditions is less interesting to me than art that survives contact with twelve-year-olds.

The complete range, including indoor and outdoor versions, is available through French brand Nedj. So while the Ingré school installation is the most visible showcase right now, these aren’t a one-off concept piece locked behind a museum velvet rope. They’re in production, which means the logic behind them, that sports equipment can also be social infrastructure, is something other schools and public spaces could genuinely access. That’s the part that feels most exciting. Good ideas should travel.

Play is serious business when it’s done well. Exercice seems to understand that the best playground equipment doesn’t hand children a script. It hands them a question. And a ping pong paddle.

The post The Ping Pong Tables at This French School Have No Rules first appeared on Yanko Design.

KFC Brazil Wants to Dress You the Way It Dresses Its Chicken

I love fried chicken as much as the next person. Probably more. So when KFC Brazil announced it was offering to customize your actual clothes with a fabric texture inspired by its iconic crispy coating, I had questions. Not the skeptical kind. More the “can they do that with a tote bag, and if so, when?” kind.

The concept is called the KFC Wardrobe, created by Lola\TBWA Brasil. The logic behind it is almost too simple to ignore. KFC’s most recognizable feature, that golden, seasoned crust Colonel Sanders spent a lifetime protecting, shares a lot of DNA with what fashion has always celebrated: something original, textured, and completely impossible to replicate. The KFC Wardrobe takes that parallel seriously and makes it completely, earnestly literal.

Designer: Lola\TBWA Brasil

Here’s how it worked: buy a medium bucket of KFC fried chicken, bring your own clothing to the brand’s flagship store in São Bernardo do Campo, and show your receipt. Eligible items included jackets, coats, jeans, skirts, bucket hats, tote bags, and waist bags. Leave them behind, and within three weeks, they’d come back to your door with a fabric treatment that mimics the texture of fried chicken breading applied to the surface. Crunchier. More textured. Somehow more interesting than before.

The promotion ran for just three days, from March 27 to 29, which makes “limited edition” feel like an understatement. It kicked off during Design Week at BAFU, described as one of São Paulo’s most prominent and respected creative hubs. KFC set the whole thing up as Colonel Sanders’ atelier. An atelier. For a fried chicken brand. I had to read that phrase twice before I could fully commit to it, and then I decided it was actually one of the most correct things anyone has said about fashion in years.

It’s worth noting that KFC has been leaning into fashion for a while now, and with increasing conviction. KFC Australia dropped a streetwear collection during Australia’s Fashion Week in 2023. KFC UK has been particularly active, releasing a ten-piece distressed leather range with Aries and collaborating with designer Sinead Gorey on a London Fashion Week show, both in 2025. At this point, the brand has clearly decided it belongs at the table, and the fashion world has quietly and somewhat bafflingly agreed.

But the KFC Wardrobe does something the earlier drops didn’t. It doesn’t ask you to buy a new KFC product. It asks to work with what you already have. That’s a fundamentally different creative stance. Most brand-adjacent fashion moves are wearable advertisements dressed up in aesthetic language. This one is a genuine collaboration with your existing wardrobe, and that’s more interesting and, honestly, a lot more respectful. KFC isn’t asking you to represent the brand. It’s asking to be part of your look, on your terms.

Fernanda Harb, KFC Brazil’s marketing director, described the initiative as a way to “expand the relationship and closeness between the brand and its customers beyond just food.” Lola\TBWA made that statement mean something real by developing an actual textile treatment, not a printed graphic or an embroidered logo, but a physical crunch-inspired texture applied to fabric. The crispy coating became the design language. That’s a design decision, not just a marketing one, and the difference shows.

The whole thing works because the metaphor at its center is genuinely earned. Fashion has always celebrated what can’t be copied. So has Colonel Sanders, for decades. You can eat KFC your whole life and never come close to the recipe. The KFC Wardrobe takes that same mystery and stitches it into your denim jacket, and that’s a creative idea worth wearing more than once.

KFC Brazil committed to the bit fully and without apology. And now there are people walking around São Paulo in textured, crunch-finished jackets, wearing their taste on their sleeves, quite literally. Fashion has come full circle, and I’ve never been this hungry for what comes next.

The post KFC Brazil Wants to Dress You the Way It Dresses Its Chicken first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Mouse Carved From Walnut That Doesn’t Exist Yet

The concept is simple enough to say out loud: a computer mouse wrapped in walnut veneer. But when you actually see what designer Eslam Mohammed has put together with the Arche One, the simplicity of that sentence falls apart quickly. This is not a novelty item with a wood sticker slapped on top. It is a full rethinking of what a peripheral can be, and it is entirely a concept, which somehow makes it more compelling, not less.

Mohammed built the Arche One as an exploration, not a product pitch. He wanted to strip out the plastic aggression that defines most tech hardware and replace it with something that feels genuinely crafted. The result is a mouse with a long arching tail, a low organic body, and walnut veneer wrapped around every curve without shortcuts. It sits somewhere between a sculptural object and a piece of furniture, and I keep going back to look at it because it makes me realize how low the bar has been set for peripheral design for decades.

Designer: Eslam Mohammed

The gaming mouse world in particular has turned aggressive posturing into an aesthetic. Angular bodies, RGB lighting, the visual vocabulary of speed and dominance. Even the more restrained productivity mice from major brands feel like they were designed to be forgotten, not noticed. What Mohammed is proposing, even if only on a screen, is a different brief entirely: make it feel like an object worth keeping.

Form came first in his process. The silhouette reads almost like a comma, or an outstretched hand resting on fine wood. The scroll wheel is machined metal, knurled and precise, sitting flush against warm grain. The underside carries a 26,000 DPI optical sensor, Bluetooth 5.3, USB-C connectivity, and a lithium-polymer battery rated at six months. The specs are serious. The material is not a gimmick dressed up as design. It is the design, or at least inseparable from it.

The production approach is worth pausing on because it says something about how contemporary 3D design is evolving. Mohammed used three separate software programs simultaneously rather than forcing a single tool to carry everything. Houdini handled the cutting simulation. Cinema 4D managed the flow of the veneer layers. Blender took care of modeling and animation, and everything went through Octane for rendering. Each tool doing exactly what it was built for, nothing more, nothing less. The result is cleaner, and the renders have a photographic weight that makes you forget you are looking at a concept. The grain catches light the way real wood does. The curves feel like they have mass.

The Arche One is imagined as a limited run of 300 units, each individually finished in hand-applied satin oil, with the note that grain pattern will vary from piece to piece. That last detail is the one that gets me. In a peripheral market built on identical units rolling off assembly lines, the idea of a mouse where no two pieces look exactly the same is almost radical. It borrows the language of craft objects and heirlooms, the kind of things people keep, pass on, and genuinely care about. That is a different conversation than the one tech hardware usually wants to have.

I think about my own desk, and I think most people have at some point looked down at their mouse and felt nothing. It is a tool, purely functional, there to be used and eventually discarded. The Arche One is a question about whether that has to be true. Whether the relationship between a person and the objects they touch every day for hours at a time could carry some weight, some intention, some warmth. That is not a trivial thing to ask.

Maybe this mouse never gets made. That is fine. Concepts do not need to ship to matter. What Mohammed has done here is demonstrate, convincingly and beautifully, that someone asked the right question. The answer is still being worked out. But the asking is more than enough.

The post The Mouse Carved From Walnut That Doesn’t Exist Yet first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Side Table That Folds a Bookshelf Into Its Own Top

Most side tables ask very little of you. You set things on them, they hold those things, and that’s the end of the conversation. The Boca table by designer Deniz Aktay is not interested in that conversation at all.

At first glance, it reads as a straightforward piece: a circular metal top, slim tubular legs bent into a smooth C-shaped base, a warm terracotta finish. Tidy, minimal, easy to place. But look at it straight on and something shifts. The tabletop isn’t flat. Its center section dips downward into a rectangular cavity, creating a hidden pocket between two metal layers. That pocket is sized to hold a book flat inside the body of the table itself. Slide one in from the side and just the spine shows, sitting flush at the edge of the circle like a small geometric tab. No separate shelf. No added structure. The storage is built into the form of the top.

Designer: Deniz Aktay

The engineering behind this is worth slowing down for. Aktay took a single metal surface and pressed a rectangular section downward, folding it into a tray-like recess while keeping the surrounding disc level and usable. The result is a top that functions on two planes simultaneously: the recessed channel holds the book, and the flat surface above holds everything else. A glass of water, a phone, a small candle, all of it sits on the upper layer without interference. The table doesn’t ask you to choose between storage and surface. It quietly offers both at the same time.

From above, the geometry becomes almost graphic. A flat orange circle with a pressed rectangle at its center, two sharp diagonal ridges fanning outward toward the rim of the disc. It has the kind of topography you’d expect from a relief map or an architectural model, a surface that communicates depth and intention before you even understand the function. Even without a book inside, the form holds your attention. The cavity doesn’t disappear when it’s empty; it becomes a compositional detail, a shadow box pressed into the metal.

The color is doing real work here too. That terracotta-to-coral finish isn’t neutral, but it isn’t loud either. It reads as considered, the kind of color that commands a corner of a room without competing with everything around it. Set against the cool silver of the tubular legs, the contrast is clean and deliberate. The legs themselves are worth noting: bent from a single continuous tube into a profile that tapers from wide at the base to narrower at the top, they give the table a visual lightness that balances the solid weight of the metal disc above. The whole piece feels grounded but not heavy.

What makes the Boca table particularly interesting from a design standpoint is how the form and function are genuinely the same thing. The slot isn’t an addition or an afterthought. It’s the result of shaping the top itself differently. The cavity exists because the metal was bent that way, not because a compartment was attached afterward. That distinction matters more than it might seem. Furniture that achieves storage through added components tends to look like it’s carrying its own extra features. Furniture that achieves storage through form tends to look inevitable, like there was never any other option. Boca belongs to the second category.

There are practical limits worth acknowledging. The fixed-width opening suits standard paperbacks and average hardcovers comfortably, but larger format books won’t fit, and anyone with a habit of keeping thick volumes on their nightstand might find it constraining. That’s a real trade-off. But the specificity of the design is also part of its character. It was made for a particular kind of use, and it doesn’t pretend otherwise.

Stuttgart-based furniture designer Deniz Aktay has been exploring this kind of structural problem-solving across his body of work for years, but the Boca table feels like one of his most resolved ideas yet. The fold does everything. The rest just gets out of the way.

The post The Side Table That Folds a Bookshelf Into Its Own Top first appeared on Yanko Design.

Furniture That Borrows Its Bones From Architecture

Most furniture design conversations orbit the same fixed points: material choices, color palettes, the eternal debate between form and function. SeongJin Hwang isn’t really interested in that conversation. With the YY Series, his studio TPGF takes a hard left turn and asks a more structural question: what if furniture borrowed its logic directly from architecture?

It sounds like a thought experiment, but the result is a collection of pieces that feel genuinely original. The series consists of two objects, the Y1 side table and the Y6 lounge chair, both built around what Hwang calls a “Y structure,” a truss-inspired configuration that mirrors the load-bearing frameworks found in bridges and buildings. The name isn’t arbitrary. Y1 uses the structure once; Y6 repeats it six times. Simple math, surprisingly compelling design.

Designer: SeongJin Hwang

What makes this interesting isn’t just the aesthetic, though the aesthetic is striking enough on its own. Look at the Y6 chair and you’ll see something that reads almost like a miniature industrial site: bolted steel joints, criss-crossing metal rods, ribbed panel surfaces. It doesn’t look like furniture trying to reference architecture. It looks like architecture that happens to be the right size to sit in. That’s a harder trick to pull off than it sounds.

The truss is one of the oldest structural tools in engineering. Builders have used triangulated frameworks to distribute weight and resist bending since well before modern steel construction, and architects have long made a visual language out of it. Steel bridges, industrial warehouses, airport terminals, concert stages; the truss pattern is everywhere once you start noticing it. Hwang’s premise is that this visual and structural logic belongs in the domestic sphere too, not as decoration, but as genuine engineering applied at a smaller, more intimate scale.

The Y1 side table is the more understated piece. On its own, a single Y structure can’t carry the load a table demands, so Hwang grounds it in a concrete block. The contrast is the point. Concrete is gravity and mass; the steel Y above it is precision and tension. Together they read like a tiny architectural section model that also holds your coffee. The rigor is real, but so is the playfulness.

The Y6 chair scales the idea up and out. Six repeating Y modules form the base and back support, creating a dense pattern of interconnected joints that distributes weight the same way a truss distributes structural stress. From the side profile, the chair looks almost impossibly mechanical, like a piece of stage rigging folded into a sitting position. From above, the bolted tabletop surface turns the ribbed panel into something straight out of an architectural rendering.

The most honest way to describe the YY Series is as furniture made by someone who wasn’t willing to forget what they learned in an architecture program the moment they sat down at a design desk. That’s not a criticism. The tendency to treat furniture and architecture as completely separate disciplines with only occasional, surface-level overlap has always felt a little artificial to me. Buildings and the objects inside them share an ongoing conversation about structure, material, and human use. The YY Series makes that conversation explicit rather than decorative.

Whether these pieces belong in a gallery or a living room is a fair question. The steel and concrete combination isn’t exactly warm, and the mechanical density of the Y6 chair isn’t for everyone’s taste. But that’s part of what makes it worth paying attention to. The YY Series isn’t trying to soften architecture into something livable. It’s inviting you to live inside the logic of architecture directly, bolts, trusses, load paths, and all.

The studio received recognition for the YY Series at the Architecture Madrid Award in October 2024. For a design rooted so firmly in structural thinking, that feels like exactly the right room to be noticed in. The work is worth tracking, and SeongJin Hwang is a designer worth knowing.

The post Furniture That Borrows Its Bones From Architecture first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Lounge Chair That Makes Geometry Feel Like a Hug

Most furniture gets described in one of two ways: you either call it comfortable or you call it beautiful. Rarely do you call it both, and almost never do you say a chair made you stop mid-scroll to figure out if it was real. The Bublyk lounge chair by Ukrainian designer Andrii Kovalskyi managed all three in a single glance.

The name is a clue. Bublyk is the Ukrainian word for a ring-shaped bread, essentially a bagel’s Eastern European cousin, and once you know that, you can’t unsee it. The torus geometry at the heart of the design, that classic ring form, is suddenly the most obvious and delightful thing in the room. But Kovalskyi doesn’t stop at one shape. He stacks cylindrical volumes alongside the torus, letting them collide and nestle against each other until the whole thing reads less like furniture and more like a soft, living sculpture that decided to sit down.

Designer: Andrii Kovalskyi

What makes this concept genuinely interesting is how Kovalskyi managed to make hard geometric forms feel warm. Torus and cylinder are architectural, mathematical shapes. They belong in textbooks and CAD files. But wrapped in a granular, speckled upholstery that carries the warmth of hand-woven textile, these volumes lose their rigidity entirely. The result is a monolithic form that still feels inviting, like a piece of abstract art you are actually allowed to sit in.

The upholstery deserves its own moment. Versions of the chair use fabrics from Kvadrat Febrik’s Sprinkles collection, and the effect is layered and compelling. Up close, each chair reads like a field of tiny woven dots and shifting patterns, the kind of surface your hands would instinctively want to reach out and touch. From a distance, the texture gives each piece an almost painterly depth, one that shifts in tone with the light. It’s the kind of material decision that elevates a strong silhouette into something that genuinely rewards sustained attention.

The collection spans a range of configurations and colorways. One version wraps the torus body in a cylindrical bolster backrest, giving it a composed, upright posture. Another presents just the torus form, low and reclining, balanced on two short cylinder legs. Viewed side by side, the variations feel like family, different personalities sharing the same underlying design logic. The colorways lean into the boldness: deep crimson reds, powdery blues, warm ochre yellows, earthy burnt oranges. None of these chairs are trying to disappear into a wall.

That feels intentional. Much of contemporary furniture design has been running hard toward quiet luxury: restrained silhouettes, neutral tones, pieces that function as background. Bublyk pushes in the opposite direction. It wants to be the first thing you notice when you walk into a room, and the piece people ask about when they visit. Whether that boldness translates into commercial production remains to be seen, since this is still a concept, but the appetite for character-driven furniture has been building for a while.

One of Kovalskyi’s renders shows the modular components stacked into abstract, totem-like arrangements, hinting at a broader system potential. If these volumes can be reconfigured or mixed across pieces, Bublyk stops being a single statement chair and becomes something closer to a design language. That is a genuinely compelling idea, the kind of thinking that separates a good concept from a lasting one.

Kovalskyi has been designing original furniture and interior objects since 2016, working out of Lviv, Ukraine. His practice spans furniture, lighting, and 3D visualization, and his work consistently shows a willingness to treat form as something to play with, rigorously but also with a sense of humor. The Bublyk chair captures that balance well. The name alone, borrowed from a humble ring-shaped bread, keeps the whole project grounded even as the visual ambition reaches upward.

Comfort is built into the promise. The ergonomics, shaped by the geometry and supported by the granular upholstery, suggest this isn’t purely a sculptural exercise. A person is supposed to sit in it and feel held. If Kovalskyi delivers that in production, Bublyk won’t just be a chair people admire from across the room. It’ll be the one nobody wants to get up from.

The post The Lounge Chair That Makes Geometry Feel Like a Hug first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Most Creative Public Space Design Right Now Is Made of Trash

The first time I saw images of Concrete Utopia, I assumed it was a render. The kind of thing that circulates on design Instagram before quietly disappearing into the “concepts that never got built” pile. Chunky grey pipes arranged in an open courtyard, people moving through and around them like it was always supposed to be this way. But the project is real, it lives outside the Museum of Contemporary Art Busan in South Korea, and the more I sat with the images, the more I found myself studying them the way you study something that seems simple until it isn’t.

Concrete Utopia is the work of South Korean designer Hyunje Joo. The material is straightforward: discarded concrete pipes, the kind used in construction infrastructure and typically hauled away once a build wraps up. What Joo does with them is the interesting part. Rather than disguising or dramatically transforming them, he arranges the pipes into a configuration that preserves exactly what they are while completely changing what they do. The cylinders are grouped and stacked at varying orientations, creating a composition that reads less like a salvage pile and more like a spatial argument. You can tell it was designed. You just can’t immediately tell how.

Designer: Hyunje Joo

The circular geometry is doing a lot of work here. Repetition is a classic design tool, but it tends to flatten things when overused. Joo avoids that by letting the pipes vary in how they cluster and orient without introducing anything new to the material vocabulary. The result is a rhythm that feels considered without feeling controlled. There’s a looseness to the arrangement that invites you in rather than holding you at a visual distance, which is harder to pull off than it looks.

What the design gets genuinely right is the question of scale. These are large industrial pipes, and placing them in a public setting without any softening or mediation could easily read as aggressive or alienating. Instead, the proportions end up working in the project’s favor. The openings in the pipes are wide enough to pass through, to sit inside, to lean against. The structure accommodates a body without being designed around one specific use. A child runs through it differently than an adult pauses inside it, and the design makes room for both without trying to orchestrate either. That kind of spatial generosity is something a lot of more considered, more expensive design projects fail to achieve.

The surface quality matters too. Concrete has a particular visual weight that doesn’t disappear regardless of context. It doesn’t soften under museum lighting or become decorative just because it’s been repositioned. Joo leans into that rather than working against it. The rawness of the material is part of the design language, not an obstacle to it. Up close, the texture of the pipes carries the evidence of their previous life, which gives the project a material honesty that polished surfaces simply can’t replicate.

The layout itself avoids fixed hierarchy, meaning there’s no obvious front or back, no primary axis that tells you where to stand or which direction to face. That’s a deliberate compositional choice, and it changes how the space feels to move through. Most public structures, even good ones, have a logic that steers you. Concrete Utopia doesn’t. You arrive at your own reading of it, and that openness is built into the arrangement rather than incidentally landing there.

Placed within the grounds of a contemporary art museum, the project sits in an interesting position between sculpture and architecture. It functions like a building but doesn’t resolve like one. It reads like an installation but behaves like infrastructure. That in-between quality is where the design lives, and it’s what makes Concrete Utopia more compelling than a straightforward sustainability gesture or a purely formal exercise would have been. Joo found a space where the design question and the material answer are the same thing. That’s not a given. Most design keeps those two things at a distance from each other for the whole project.

The post The Most Creative Public Space Design Right Now Is Made of Trash first appeared on Yanko Design.

One Design Concept Is Treating Your Plate Like a Mood Board

We’ve seen AI make itself comfortable in our music, our fashion, and our skincare routines. It was only a matter of time before it pulled up a chair at the dinner table. Kitune, a design concept by Seoul-based designer Jiyeon Choi, is exactly that moment, arriving in the form of a compact, butter-yellow device that looks more like a studio prop than a kitchen appliance. As a concept, it’s already asking a question that most kitchen technology doesn’t bother with: what if the way your food looks was just as personal as the way you dress?

The premise is deceptively simple. Food, Choi argues, has crossed well beyond the realm of taste and into the realm of visual expression. That’s a hard argument to push back on. You only need to spend thirty seconds on any social feed to see that the way a dish looks now carries as much cultural weight as what it actually tastes like. Plating is styling. Styling is identity. Food shows up in fashion editorials, in art installations, in luxury brand campaigns. It has become its own visual language, and Kitune is a concept built entirely around that reality.

Designer: Jiyeon Choi

Here’s how the concept works. The device takes in personal data you’ve selected and tuned, your aesthetic preferences, your current mood, your lifestyle references, and uses it to generate a visual concept for how your dish should look. Not a vague suggestion, but a specific, styled direction. From there, a built-in projector casts a real-time plating guide directly onto your surface, showing you where each element should land. There are also mood-matched visual overlays that let you feel the overall atmosphere of the dish before you commit to placing a single garnish. It’s a feedback loop between your data and your plate.

That last part sounds theatrical, but I think that’s deliberately the point. Kitune isn’t trying to make you a more efficient cook. It’s trying to make cooking feel more like creative expression, and that’s a meaningful shift in what kitchen technology usually promises. Whether as a concept or an eventual product, that distinction matters.

The hardware design is genuinely considered. Kitune is conceived as a portable device that works in two configurations: a handheld form for close, controlled work and a standing version where an arm suspends the projector above your plate. Both modes carry the same cheerful yellow finish, which matters more than it might seem. That color choice softens what could easily feel like cold, clinical AI tech in a space that’s historically been warm and human. It signals that this device belongs to the experience of cooking, not just the logistics of it.

The interface is also worth attention. Instead of typing prompts or navigating flat touchscreen menus, the concept proposes interacting with a circular dial loaded with mood and lifestyle imagery that you physically rotate and select. It’s tactile, and that decision feels very deliberate. Choi seems to understand that the kitchen is not a place where people want to feel like they’re operating software. The interaction needs to feel as intuitive and sensory as the act it’s guiding.

Where Kitune really makes its case as a concept is in how it reframes what personalization means. Most AI products personalize around efficiency, faster, smarter, more optimized. Kitune personalizes around feeling. The output isn’t a quicker route or a better recommendation. It’s a visual mood built from your data that’s meant to feel like you, on a particular day, in a particular state of mind. That’s a genuinely different kind of design ambition, and one that feels more honest about the role food actually plays in people’s lives.

There are real questions the concept raises. How much data does it need to work well? Does it develop a sharper sense of you over time, or does each session reset? These are the practical gaps between a compelling concept and a working product. But Kitune doesn’t need to answer all of them right now to be worth paying attention to. As a design statement, it’s already saying something clear: that the future of kitchen technology might have less to do with what you’re cooking, and a lot more to do with how it makes you feel.

The post One Design Concept Is Treating Your Plate Like a Mood Board first appeared on Yanko Design.