WhatsApp shared multiple quality of life updates coming to its messaging platform starting today. The first is a long awaited option to have two accounts on a single iOS device. The option has been available for years on Android, and iPhone users can now be logged into two separate accounts at once. The profile photo for the account will be visible in the bottom tab to double-check which persona you're messaging as.
The other new features allow for easier movement of chat histories, both between platforms and devices in the same ecosystem. This chat transfer should make it easier to retain messages when upgrading to a new phone, especially if you're switching between iOS and Android. There's also a new option to delete large files directly from a WhatsApp chat to avoid storage clutter. It's available under the Manage Storage option when you tap a chat's name. It includes an option to delete just media files from a conversation.
And of course it wouldn't be a tech news announcement without at least some AI features present. WhatsApp now supports using Meta AI for light photo editing, including removing backgrounds, changing aesthetic styles and deleting elements from the composition. There's also a Writing Help prompt that uses AI to help draft a message, although Meta's blog post states that using this still keeps chats private. The above features should be arriving to all WhatsApp users “soon,” according to the company.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/whatsapp-rolls-out-updates-including-multiple-accounts-for-ios-130000252.html?src=rss
The Steam Deck has taken a significant step forward in portable gaming with the introduction of the DLSS Enabler plug-in, a feature designed to bridge Nvidia-exclusive technologies and AMD hardware. Developed with input from the gaming community, this plug-in enables DLSS4 multi-frame generation, allowing supported games to achieve up to four times the frames per […]
Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 8, the latest addition to its foldable smartphone lineup, builds upon the foundation laid by its predecessors with a series of refinements. While the design remains largely consistent with the Z Fold 7, the device introduces notable improvements in durability, performance, and functionality. However, with a projected price of $2,000, the […]
Jay E | RoboNuggets examines how the new Drawbridge plugin enhances AI-driven web design by allowing users to annotate browser elements visually. This free Chrome extension supports screenshots, HTML and comments to create detailed instructions for AI systems, eliminating the reliance on text-based commands. For instance, users can save tasks in a markdown file (`mo_tasks.md`) […]
Apple’s macOS 26.4 introduces a range of updates aimed at enhancing customization, productivity, and the overall user experience. With smarter battery management, refined app interfaces, and improved system settings, this release addresses user feedback while introducing practical new tools. Below is a detailed exploration of the key features and updates, showcasing how they can positively […]
After achieving action camera success, Insta360 invaded DJI’s turf with the first mass-market panoramic drone, the Antigravity A1. It had instant appeal for drone pilots, offering 8K 360 video and features like subject tracking, obstacle detection and FPV flying.
Though beaten to the punch, DJI has responded quickly with the Avata 360, aided by its drone experience and camera tech from the new Osmo 360 action cam. It has a lot in common with its rival, but it’s safer to fly around people and offers single camera 4K footage on top of 8K 360 video.
To find out how the Avata 360 stacks up against the A1, I tested it both indoors and out, around people and even “stunt” horses. The Avata 360 isn’t perfect, but it is far more polished than its rival. As with other DJI drones of late, though, US availability remains unclear.
How the Avata 360 works
The 360 camera makes the Avata 360 different from any other DJI drone. It features two ultrawide cameras with f/1.9 lenses and 1.1-inch 64-megapixel sensors, with one pointing up and the other down for unobstructed 200-degree views. Those are then stitched together by software to create 360 degree video at up to 8K 60 fps.
This setup fundamentally changes the way you pilot a drone and capture video. Since the 360 camera records everything around it, you can focus on flying and reframe shots later in DJI’s Studio app. That 360 view is also handy when piloting in FPV mode. With the head tracking on DJI’s Goggles N3, you can look all around you simply by turning your head.
Unlike the Antigravity A1 that only shoots 360 video, the Avata 360 supports regular single-camera shooting as well. When you switch to that mode, the camera rotates forward and shoots 4K video at up to 60 fps with a 28mm field of view. DJI’s drone also works with a regular controller, which isn’t an option on the A1. You have to use the Insta360’s goggles at all times.
Design
Because of the chunky 360 camera, the Avata 360 is slightly bigger than the Avata 2. It’s also quite a bit heavier at 455 grams (one pound) and so, unlike the 249-gram Antigravity A1, you’ll need a permit to fly one in most regions.
The Avata 360’s propellers are shielded to protect the drone and keep it safe indoors or around people, unlike the open-prop A1. For additional protection it has two omni obstacle sensors on the side, a Lidar sensor up front, landing sensors on the bottom and, of course, a camera that points in all directions. To keep the lenses off of bare ground, it comes with a foldable 18x18-inch landing mat.
DJI’s Goggles N3 (available with the RC Motion 3 controller as an option) are comfortable and allow you to wear eyeglasses. Unlike the Goggles 3, though, there’s no external camera to see outside. If you’d rather pilot conventionally, you can get the Avata 360 bundled with DJI’s RC 2 screen controller in another kit.
Performance and features
As an FPV drone, the Avata 360 is fast and agile. It can hit speeds up to 40 MPH in sport mode (without obstacle avoidance) or 35 MPH in normal mode. When used with the optional FPV Remote Controller 3, you can do flips, rolls and other “cinewhoop” style maneuvers. Once you get used to flying it that way, it’s incredibly fun.
The 38.7Wh batteries have 26 percent more capacity than the Avata 2’s cells, but rated endurance is about the same at 24 minutes. I never got more than about 18 minutes in real-world flying though, so it’s a good idea to buy the Fly More kit with three batteries and a fast charger that can replenish them all in about 100 minutes.
Samuel Dejours for Engadget
Part of my testing of the Avata 360 was capturing “trick riding” horses, so it was important that the drone noise didn’t spook them. At 81db the Avata 360 is louder than the Mini 4 Pro (67 db) and less banshee-like than the Neo 2 due to the larger propellers, so the horses weren’t alarmed.
Video is transmitted to the Goggles N3 and RC Motion 3 controller (or the RC screen controller) at 1080p 60 fps via DJI’s OcuSync 4.0+ system. The maximum flying range is 20 km (12.4 miles), double that of the Avata 2. This is an impressive distance for an FPV drone.
The 45GB of internal storage (42GB usable) can fill up quickly when you’re shooting 8K video, but the drone also has a microSD slot. To get your footage onto a PC or smartphone, you can transfer it via the USB-C port or over Wi-Fi using DJI’s Fly app.
The Avata 360 has DJI’s usual tracking and obstacle detection features, but they’re available only with the RC 2 controller and not the Goggles N3. To follow a subject, simply draw a box around them on the controller to enable Focus Track and its three modes: Spotlight, Point of Interest and ActiveTrack. The latter tracks a subject automatically and lets you control the drone’s position via an on-screen “steering wheel.”
Steve Dent for Engadget
To test that, I biked in a narrow forested lane and walked around a bamboo-covered obstacle course. When using Focus Track, the drone dodged most obstacles and was only confused by small leaves and branches. If it did contact one of those, it sailed right through without crashing thanks to the propeller guards.
Subject tracking works in both 360 and single camera modes, but when using the latter, The Avata 360 can’t see and avoid obstacles behind it. It contacted branches several times during my testing, but fortunately the prop guards prevented crashes. Other automatic features include Dronie, Rocket and Quickshot modes that let you capture clips for social media.
Video
The Avata 360 prioritizes FPV freedom and flexibility over pure video quality. Though the specs promise 8K, that only applies to the full 360 degree video — your final, flat video will actually be 4K or less after processing. And the 360 camera zooms digitally (not optically), which further reduces resolution. On top of that, you can often see a “seam” in the video where stitching occurs, and dewarping (used to output flat video) can create softness at the edges. With all that, video is less sharp than DJI’s regular Mini, Air and Mavic drones.
Because the camera is fixed when shooting 360 video, the Avata 360’s gimbal can’t smooth out jolts or correct for roll. Instead, it uses action cam-style electronic stabilization. What’s more, that type of smoothing causes motion blur and artifacts in low light due to the lower shutter speeds — something I also noticed with the Osmo 360.
Steve Dent for Engadget
With that said, video quality was as sharp and color-accurate as the Osmo 360, and a touch better than the Antigravity A1 when filming in daylight. For tricky, contrasty conditions like a shaded path on a sunny day, the D-LogM option boosted dynamic range, helping me bring out shadow detail and tone down overly-bright highlights. However, the cityscape I shot at night was soft and occasionally blurry due to the aforementioned stabilization issues.
In exchange for this lower video quality, the 360 camera provides incredible flexibility. For a vlog style tracking shot, for instance, I usually need to film twice to show the forward and backward directions. With the Avata 360, though, I was able to get both POVs from the same shot and output an overhead view too for good measure.
DJI Studio is where you go to select your desired framing and output the flat video. It’s not quite as versatile as Insta360’s app, but it allows you to reframe shots and create smooth transitions between camera angles. And to save time, you can use the Intelligent Tracking feature to center your subject. The app also offers color correction and other features, but I found it easier to export the final shots to DaVinci Resolve for any additional work.
Flat video a mixed bag. Sharpness is mildly better than the 360 video, but the lack of a gimbal roll axis means that the camera can’t level itself when the drone banks into the wind. As a result, most of my footage was tilted and often unusable.
Wrap-up
Steve Dent for Engadget
With the Avata 360, DJI has a surprisingly sophisticated drone that offers better video quality and more features than its only rival, Insta360’s Antigravity A1. It can do everything you’d expect from a DJI FPV drone like tracking, obstacle avoidance and acrobatics, while operating safely around people (or horses).
DJI also managed to undercut Insta360 on price, with the Avata 360 starting at 459 euros (approx. $530), or 939 euros ($1,089) in a kit with a screen controller, three batteries and a charger. It’s also available with the extra batteries and charger, DJI’s FPV Goggles N3 and the RC Motion 3 controller for 939 euros ($1,089). As mentioned, there’s no word yet on US pricing, but the Avata 360 has been approved by the FCC so it could appear in the US soon.
Like 360 action cams though, this is a niche product. If you’re a vlogger, extreme action shooter, FPV pilot or solo filmmaker who wants speed and flexibility, the Avata 360 is a great choice. If it’s pixel perfect image quality you want, however, you’re better off with DJI’s Mini 5 Pro, Air 3S or Avata 4 Pro drone.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/cameras/dji-avata-360-drone-review-360-video-hits-new-highs-120014666.html?src=rss
Ray-Ban Meta glasses have introduced new lenses developed by VR Rock, a company previously known for its VR headset lenses. These lenses come in three distinct options: brown tinted, pink gradient and gray transition. Each type offers specific features, such as adaptive light transitions for changing environments and gradient tints for a stylish yet functional […]
The handheld gaming PC market has a design problem. For every device that earns a second look, there are three more that look like they escaped from a toy aisle — chunky plastic grips, aggressive LED halos, fonts borrowed from energy drink cans. It adds up to a category that has historically rewarded specs over sensibility, power over the kind of quiet confidence that makes an object worth owning.
That’s starting to change. A new wave of devices is rethinking what portable gaming hardware should look and feel like: objects you’d carry without embarrassment, leave on a clean desk, or hand to someone who doesn’t play games, so they can appreciate the craft before they’ve touched a button. Some of these seven handhelds earn their place through industrial restraint. Others earn it through engineering honesty — upgradeability, connectivity, or a refusal to treat the buyer as someone who only needs to be impressed in the first five minutes. What they all share is an understanding that good design is a feature, not a finish.
1. AYANEO 3
The curves are the story. AYANEO’s third flagship iteration takes a category that has historically prioritized power over personality and gives it something more interesting: softness. The smooth, pleasing curves on the AYANEO 3 extend beyond the ergonomic grip area on the back to the corners of the device itself, rounding off every edge that might otherwise make the hardware feel aggressive or alienating. It is a small visual distinction that makes an enormous tonal difference. The result is a device that looks like it was designed for people rather than exclusively for the kind of person who already knows what a TDP setting is and can tell you why it matters.
The diagonal orientation of the analog joysticks and D-Pad mirrors the Xbox controller arrangement, which is one of those invisible ergonomic improvements you only register when a device gets it wrong. The larger back buttons are a genuine upgrade in theory, giving players more surface area to work with during extended sessions. Their positioning, though, introduces the real possibility of accidental presses during intense gameplay. This trade-off will feel familiar to anyone who has tried to improve on a layout that was already functional. The AYANEO 3 makes the strongest argument for design as a feature in its own right. Whether that argument is worth the price is the question you’ll be asking yourself after you pick it up for the first time.
What We Like:
Rounded, curve-forward chassis makes it the most approachable-looking handheld in its category
Diagonal joystick and button orientation mirrors Xbox ergonomics for more natural long-session play
What We Dislike:
Back button placement may result in accidental presses during fast-paced gameplay
Softened design language may not satisfy players who want their hardware to read as purposeful and performance-oriented
2. Acer Nitro Blaze 7
Acer enters the handheld arena with something the market actually needed: a device that solves Windows gaming’s most persistent pain point before you even load your first title. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS packs 39 AI TOPS, placing it on the same performance tier as many AI-powered laptops currently on the market. Paired with the AMD Radeon 780M and 16GB of RAM, the Nitro Blaze 7 arrives as serious hardware in a compact form. The 7-inch 1920×1080 144Hz IPS touchscreen with 100% sRGB color gamut coverage is the kind of display specification that makes comparable handhelds feel like compromises — vibrant and bright enough that even the darkest visual environments read clearly on screen.
What separates the Nitro Blaze 7 from the competition isn’t the chip — it’s the software thinking wrapped around it. The Acer Game Space feature consolidates titles from every platform and source into a single unified library, removing the multi-menu navigation friction that makes Windows gaming handhelds feel like a productivity task compared to SteamOS devices. Touchscreen support lets players interact directly with interface elements rather than routing everything through controller input, which matters more than it sounds when you are three minutes into a launch session and still navigating settings. The dedicated hotkey that drops you straight into your library is a small thing that solves a real and recurring problem, and that is exactly the kind of design thinking this category needs to normalize.
What We Like:
Acer Game Space consolidates multi-platform libraries into one interface, fixing Windows gaming’s biggest UX friction point
144Hz IPS display with 100% sRGB delivers premium visual quality for a 7-inch handheld screen
What We Dislike:
The IPS panel means the Blaze 7 lacks the contrast depth and blacks of OLED competitors
At 7 inches, the display is smaller than the growing number of competitors now shipping with 8-inch screens
3. Steam Deck OLED Limited Edition White
Valve’s limited edition white Steam Deck is the rare hardware release that justifies its price premium through object quality alone. The off-white shell with gray buttons and a single orange power button is a restrained, confident color story that most hardware brands spend years failing to tell. The OLED panel with HDR support already positioned the standard Steam Deck a visual step above the LCD models, and the white chassis makes that contrast even more vivid — display colors read differently against a lighter surround, and the overall effect is closer to a premium consumer electronics object than a gaming peripheral. Valve pairs the device with a matching white carrying case and a microfiber cloth, because they know exactly what that surface will attract daily.
Available only in the 1TB configuration, the limited edition white Steam Deck is not a casual purchase — it is priced above the standard black variant, and that premium is entirely about the colorway rather than any specification difference. Valve has been direct about the potential for further bold color options depending on how this version performs in the market, and the design language of this release suggests they genuinely understand that hardware can carry emotional weight beyond its spec sheet. Their stated commitment to continued software and hardware improvements also changes the calculus on what the purchase represents. You are not buying a device at its peak; you are buying into an object that the people who made it intend to keep improving.
What We Like:
The off-white and orange colorway is the most considered visual design statement in the handheld gaming category
1TB OLED configuration with HDR support represents the best display quality available in a handheld gaming PC
What We Dislike:
The white shell will show dirt and wear significantly faster than the black variant, demanding frequent cleaning
Limited edition pricing premium is cosmetic rather than functional, which makes it a harder case to make to practical buyers
4. MSI Claw 8 AI+
MSI’s second attempt at a handheld gaming PC makes a strong case for listening. The original Claw’s 53Wh battery was one of the most discussed disappointments in gaming hardware, and the Claw 8 AI+ responds with an 80Wh unit that matches the ROG Ally X — immediately removing that criticism from the conversation. The redesigned chassis is more comfortable to hold than the original, which sounds like a modest correction but represents the difference between a product you use and one you tolerate through a session. The 8-inch display at 1080p and 120Hz is the screen you can actually picture using across several hours without fatigue, and the overall hardware package reflects a manufacturer that took its first attempt as useful data rather than a finished result.
The dual Thunderbolt ports are the detail that separates the Claw 8 AI+ from most of its direct competition. In a category where connectivity has generally been an afterthought, Thunderbolt transforms the device into something more versatile than a dedicated gaming handheld. It can drive an external display, connect high-speed peripherals, and function as a desktop replacement when docked — a use case that justifies the form factor for people who travel and need their hardware to earn its carry weight across more than one context. MSI’s continued driver support for the original Claw also signals something about the relationship they want to build with buyers, which matters when you are deciding which ecosystem to invest in for the long term.
What We Like:
80Wh battery resolves the original Claw’s most criticized weakness, matching the ROG Ally X for endurance
Dual Thunderbolt ports offer versatility that positions the device beyond pure gaming into broader portable computing
What We Dislike:
1080p resolution on an 8-inch screen sits at the market standard rather than pushing the category forward
The redesigned chassis was not available for hands-on evaluation at launch, leaving the real-world grip feel unconfirmed
5. ADATA XPG Nia
The XPG Nia arrives with a design philosophy that most handheld manufacturers have been too conservative to commit to: repairability as a genuine feature. The use of LPCAMM2 memory modules, which are not soldered to the motherboard, makes this one of the very few handheld gaming PCs where upgrading the RAM is a realistic possibility rather than a route to a voided warranty. The M.2 2230 SSD slot handles storage upgrades in the same way, borrowing the kind of upgrade-friendly architecture that better laptops have offered for years. ADATA, better known for its data storage solutions than gaming hardware, brings exactly the right technical background to a product that treats longevity as a design consideration rather than an inconvenience.
This matters more than it sounds in a category that has normalized the idea of buying new hardware every two years because your existing device can’t be updated. Handheld PCs are essentially miniature laptops running laptop-grade hardware with constrained cooling, which has traditionally meant buyers are locked into the specs they purchase on day one. The XPG Nia pushes back against that assumption. It may not carry the brand recognition of Valve or ASUS, but the decision to make memory and storage user-upgradable in a handheld gaming PC is genuinely forward-thinking hardware design. The category is full of devices optimized for the unboxing moment. The XPG Nia is designed for year three.
What We Like:
Upgradable RAM via the LPCAMM2 module makes it one of the only handhelds built for long-term ownership
Upgradable M.2 2230 SSD slot extends the device’s useful lifespan well beyond its launch-day specifications
What We Dislike:
Real-world ease of RAM upgrades remains unproven, as LPCAMM2 is a relatively new memory format
ADATA’s identity as a storage brand creates unanswered questions around long-term software support and gaming ecosystem depth
6. GPD Pocket 4
The GPD Pocket 4 does not belong in this list by conventional logic, and that is precisely why it does. There are no joysticks, no D-pad, no face buttons. What it has instead is a compact clamshell form factor built around a full QWERTY keyboard, a small touchpad in the upper right corner designed for right-thumb operation in a two-handed grip, and mouse buttons positioned on the opposing side for the left thumb. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with AMD Radeon 890M graphics, 64GB of RAM, and up to 4TB of upgradable NVMe SSD storage inside this chassis is a genuine statement about what a pocket-sized device can accomplish. It is a handheld PC for the person who refuses to separate productivity from portability.
Where most devices in this roundup are gaming handhelds that can also browse the web, the Pocket 4 is a legitimate laptop replacement that can also play games within certain limits. Content creation, entertainment, productivity, and travel computing are all addressed by hardware that fits in a jacket pocket. The 44.8Wh battery is the honest trade-off — you are carrying a compressed laptop, not an augmented gaming console, and the battery reflects that compromise directly. For the person who travels constantly and wants one device that handles most things well rather than two devices that each do one thing perfectly, the Pocket 4 makes more sense than almost anything else in this roundup. It is the most unusual recommendation here, and the most interesting.
What We Like:
Full laptop-grade specifications, including up to 64GB RAM and 4TB upgradable storage in a genuinely pocketable form factor
Functions as a true laptop replacement for content creation and productivity without requiring a second device
What We Dislike:
No gaming controls confine its gaming capability to keyboard-compatible titles only
The 44.8Wh battery is significantly smaller than competitors that prioritize gaming endurance over overall portability
7. ZOTAC ZONE
The ZOTAC ZONE wears its Steam Deck influence openly and then raises the conversation. The OLED display puts it in rare company — most handheld gaming PCs are still shipping IPS panels, and the presence of an OLED screen here is not incidental. The PlayStation-style button layout mirrors Valve’s device directly, setting it apart from the Xbox-influenced arrangement that the rest of the Windows handheld market has effectively standardized around. The built-in kickstand is the detail that reveals the ZONE’s genuine design thinking. It is an obvious feature that a surprising number of handheld PCs have decided to leave out, and its presence changes how the device lives in practice — on a plane tray table, a cafe counter, or a hotel room desk, where you’d rather not hold the thing for two hours straight.
The configurable controls are where the ZONE earns its premium positioning. Two-stage adjustable triggers and programmable dials around each joystick represent the most granular control customization available on any handheld gaming PC currently on the market. It runs more recent hardware than the Steam Deck, inside a chassis that clearly understands what it is trying to be. The steep price is a real barrier, and the ZONE will not make sense for every buyer. For the player who has worked through two or three handheld PCs already and knows precisely what they want from their next one — better controls, better display, a stand, and hardware that will not feel dated inside eighteen months — this is the device that was built with them specifically in mind.
What We Like:
Built-in kickstand and OLED display address two genuine gaps in the Steam Deck’s design, both meaningfully improving day-to-day use
Two-stage adjustable triggers and programmable joystick dials offer the deepest control customization in the handheld gaming PC category
What We Dislike:
Premium pricing places the ZONE significantly above most competing devices, narrowing its realistic audience
Strong visual and layout parallels to the Steam Deck make it a difficult upgrade pitch for buyers already in Valve’s ecosystem
The Category Grows Up
The seven devices above represent a category finally learning to want more from itself. Some of them get there through craft — the AYANEO 3’s considered curves, the ZOTAC ZONE’s OLED display and kickstand, the Steam Deck’s limited edition color story. Others earn their place through a harder kind of honesty: the XPG Nia’s upgradable RAM, the GPD Pocket 4’s refusal to be just one thing, the Claw 8 AI+’s willingness to publicly correct its own mistakes.
What unites all seven is a seriousness about the object itself — a sense that the person holding the device deserves hardware that respects their intelligence, their living space, and the money they are spending. The Fisher-Price era of handheld gaming PCs is not entirely over. But these seven devices are making a strong case for what comes after them.
OpenAI has "indefinitely" abandoned plans to release an a erotic chatbot for adults following concerns from employees and investors, the company confirmed to The Financial Times. Plans for such a feature, first announced in October 2025 for release in December last year, had already been delayed while company debated whether to release it all. It's the second app OpenAI has decided to shelf this week, after announcing on Tuesday that it was shutting down its Sora video generator.
The adult-oriented chatbot, reportedly called "Citron mode," is now on hold with no planned release date. The company reportedly had difficulty training models that previously avoided erotic content and also removing illegal behavior like bestiality or incest, two people familiar with the matter told the FT.
Open AI said that it wanted to conduct long-term research on the effects of erotic chats and user attachment to AI, adding that there was currently not yet enough "empirical evidence" on the subject. The company also said it wanted to focus on its core productivity tools like coding assistants and drop "side quests" like Sora and the erotic chatbot.
The idea for adult features came after OpenAI announced that it would add parental controls and automatic age detection features for ChatGPT. CEO Sam Altman said back in October that the company had always been careful about such issues over concerns around unhealthy AI attachments, but felt comfortable that it could "safely relax the restrictions in most cases."
However, the adult mode had reportedly caused concern among investors, particularly amid the controversy caused by rival xAI's Grok model that generated deepfake nudes of real people and children. Staff also worried about the feature, with one senior employee even leaving the company over the issue. "AI shouldn’t replace your friends or your family; you should have human connections," he told the FT.
Another challenge is OpenAI's age-checking tech, introduced following lawsuits from families who said that ChatGPT harmed their children. The tech reportedly has an error right higher than ten percent, which would still give a large number of young people access to the tech. OpenAI said that figure is in the industry standard range and that it is continuing to work on its accuracy.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/openai-drops-plans-to-release-an-adult-chatbot-113121190.html?src=rss
The collaboration between Claude Code and Stitch 2.0 introduces a structured approach to web design and development, emphasizing efficiency and accessibility. Jack Roberts explains how Stitch 2.0 uses AI to generate layouts, UI components and branding elements based on inputs like text prompts or images. For example, it can create cohesive typography and color schemes […]
