Meet The IRIS eTrike, The SWAT Kats Style Commuter Pod That Doesn’t Need A Driver’s License

Remember the Cyclotron from SWAT Kats, that enclosed motorcycle where the rider sat inside a protective cockpit instead of perched on top like a regular bike? The IRIS eTrike looks like someone pulled that 1990s animation concept into reality, then made it street legal and available for around £10,000. Grant Sinclair’s creation wraps you in carbon fiber and acrylic while filtering the air you breathe, protecting you from weather and impacts, and delivering acceleration that made an astronaut audibly impressed on national television. The whole thing reads like a childhood sketch that somehow survived into adulthood and picked up a spec sheet along the way.

This is not a modified e-bike with a fairing bolted on. The structure uses a carbon fiber monocoque shell with integrated impact absorbing elements, the same construction philosophy you see in race cars and high end velomobiles. A 48V battery feeds motors ranging from 250W to 1000W depending on which regulations you want to play with. The result hits around 30 mph, travels roughly 30 to 50 miles per charge depending on source and configuration, and still qualifies as an electrically assisted pedal cycle that teenagers can legally ride without insurance or licensing in the UK. Sinclair calls it an answer to urban congestion and climate pressure. It lands visually like science fiction that escaped the screen and wandered into the bike lane.

Designer: Grant Sinclair

Here is where it gets interesting from a design perspective. Most e-bikes still cling to the visual language of the bicycle frame, even when the electronics and performance have drifted far from that origin. IRIS throws that out and starts from a capsule, then works backward to fit a drivetrain and pedals inside. The rider sits enclosed under an aviation acrylic canopy, with the company describing the experience as like riding inside a large crash helmet. That analogy works, because the shell is not aesthetic garnish. It is structure, safety device, weather shield, and aerodynamic surface all at once.

The numbers back up the design intent. Two 24 inch carbon BMX wheels up front, one 26 inch carbon MTB wheel at the rear, all on puncture resistant Tannus tires, give it a footprint that is still narrow enough for cycle lanes but visually substantial enough that you do not feel like a speed bump in traffic. Mechanical disc brakes handle stopping, which is conservative but probably easier to maintain for people used to bikes rather than motorcycles. Claimed weight is around 50 kg including the battery, which puts it in velomobile territory rather than microcar territory. That matters, because you are still pedaling. The motor is assist, not a throttle only scooter masquerading as a bicycle.

The IRIS’ closed cockpit won’t have you feeling the wind in your hair, but it does pack its own HVAC. There is a patent pending system that channels cooled air directly onto the 130 Nm motor to keep efficiency up on climbs. At the same time, the cabin air runs through HEPA filtration that targets smoke, germs, and general city gunk. This solves two classic velomobile complaints in one go, heat build up and stale cabin air. If you are going to seal someone into a plastic and carbon tube in London traffic, you had better be thinking about airflow. IRIS clearly did, and that is where you see the difference between a novelty vehicle and something that might survive daily use.

Of course, the £10,000 price tag is going to trigger instant comparisons to cars, cargo bikes, and very nice traditional e-bikes. From a pure transport economics viewpoint, a used EV or a solid cargo bike setup will look saner for most people. From a design and category perspective, though, IRIS is playing a different game. It targets the solo commuter who wants car like enclosure, bike like access to infrastructure, and sci fi visual drama. That is a niche, but it is a real niche, especially in cities that are tightening car access and expanding protected lanes.

All that performance capability creates an interesting regulatory puzzle, one that Sinclair has solved quite cleverly. The IRIS is officially classified as an Electrically Assisted Pedal Cycle, or EAPC. This means that, in the UK at least, it can be ridden on roads and in cycle lanes by anyone aged 14 and over. There is no requirement for a driver’s license, road tax, or insurance, which removes enormous barriers to entry. By designing the vehicle to fit within this specific classification, Sinclair has created a high-performance commuter that enjoys all the legal freedoms of a simple bicycle, a brilliant piece of strategic engineering.

I keep coming back to the cultural lineage here. The Sinclair C5 is the ghost in the room, a low slung, underpowered, ahead of its time experiment that became a punchline. IRIS feels like a direct rebuttal. Higher seating, serious power, serious materials, a body that looks more like a velodrome helmet than a plastic bathtub. The same family name, but with four decades of battery tech, composite manufacturing, and urban policy shifts in its corner. You can see the quiet argument in the design: the idea was not wrong, the context was.

Does that mean IRIS becomes common on city streets? Probably not. It is too specific, too opinionated, too expensive to flood the market. What it does very effectively is stretch the Overton window of what an e-bike can look like and how much protection and tech you can wrap around human power before it stops feeling like cycling. If you grew up watching animated bikes that turned into fighter jets, IRIS feels like the first time someone took that sensibility seriously and then called the result an electrically assisted pedal cycle, with a straight face and a spec sheet to match.

The post Meet The IRIS eTrike, The SWAT Kats Style Commuter Pod That Doesn’t Need A Driver’s License first appeared on Yanko Design.

Apple’s 50th Anniversary Gets a Retro iPhone 17 Pro Case Inspired by the Lisa and Macintosh

Spigen keeps one foot planted firmly in Apple’s past. Their retro-inspired cases have become something of a signature move, from iMac G3 translucent homages to see-through AirPods cases that capture Jony Ive’s obsession with showing off internal components. The accessory maker has proven there’s a market for nostalgia you can actually use.

The Classic LS marks a pivot from colorful transparency to utilitarian elegance. Celebrating Apple’s 50th anniversary, this new case reaches back to the Macintosh 128k and Apple Lisa era, when computers came in beige enclosures and harbored revolutionary ambitions. The platinum-gray finish, ridged camera module, and rainbow logo placement all reference those iconic machines. Spigen has managed to honor the design legacy and vision Steve Jobs set in motion while keeping features like MagSafe and Camera Control Button functionality intact.

Design: Spigen

Click Here to Buy Now

Pivoting to the 128k and Lisa is a deliberate, almost academic move compared to their previous work. The iMac G3 was about making computers seem fun and harmless; the Macintosh was about making them seem possible. This case captures that earlier, more serious ethos. The horizontal ridges around the camera module directly evoke the necessary ventilation slats of those CRT-era machines, and the case’s texture feels like a direct nod to the plastics of the time.

All this design reverence would be wasted if it didn’t work as an actual case for a 2026 flagship. Spigen is limiting this to the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, with built-in support for the Camera Control Button (rather than a mere cutout). For $39.99, you get the expected MagSafe ring and a discrete lanyard cutout, so the aesthetic doesn’t compromise modern convenience. This is a piece of designed history that actually functions as a daily driver, not just a shelf-bound novelty item.

It’s just refreshing to see an accessory that has a real, informed opinion. The market is drowning in a sea of identical clear cases and minimalist leather folios that say absolutely nothing. The Classic LS, however, makes a statement. It’s for a different kind of Apple enthusiast, one who appreciates the foundational designs that made today’s devices possible. It wraps a sleek, modern slab of technology in something with texture, history, and a point of view. Spigen has managed to create a product that feels both nostalgic and completely current.

Click Here to Buy Now

The post Apple’s 50th Anniversary Gets a Retro iPhone 17 Pro Case Inspired by the Lisa and Macintosh first appeared on Yanko Design.

DIY LEGO ‘Connect 4’ Brickset lets you actually play the game after building it!

There aren’t many LEGO sets designed to played with once they’re built. A lot of them are envisioned as show-pieces, and yes, you can do imaginary play with them like you would holding a LEGO Millennium Falcon and whooshing around the house, but this MOC from HH Bricks captures a kind of LEGO playability that’s absolutely rare. Inspired by his daughters’ love for building and playing with LEGO, HH Bricks designed this playable version of one of the world’s most popular tabletop games.

For those uninitiated, Connect 4 is a simple game where you drop tokens down a vertical slot-board, trying to build a set of 4 tokens in a straight line. Your job is to simply build a straight line without being stopped, while also consistently breaking your opponent’s ability to build a solid 4 streak on their own. The game just celebrated 50 years since it was first invented in 1974 (and commercially sold in ’75), and this set recreates the game’s strategic magic, just using LEGO bricks.

Designer: HH Bricks

Although HH Bricks doesn’t specify how many pieces come together to build this set, one could venture it’s easily in the higher end of the spectrum, just because of how many tiny single or double-stud bricks were used to build the set’s flat panels and the 42 tokens that come along with the board. Flat surfaces are fairly complex in LEGO, not because of any visual complexity, but just the fact that they require a lot of bricks to build out.

The rules are ridiculously simple. Each player chooses a color and gets to work, dropping tokens into any slot they want. Beat your opponent by building a connection of 4 tokens in the same color in a straight line (horizontal, vertical, or diagonal). Some people even play a double-streak round, trying to hit two connections to eventually win the game. Once the game is over, simply pull out the bottom tray and all the tokens come crashing out, reseting the game for the next session.

If you’re here you’ve probably heard of LEGO Ideas – the online forum where LEGO fans and enthusiasts build, share, and vote for MOCs (or fan-made My Own Creations). This LEGO Connect 4 set is a part of the Ideas forum too, having racked up more than 2,800 votes as of writing this. The ultimate goal is to hit the 10k vote mark (which this MOC has 478 more days to reach), following which LEGO’s internal team reviews the build and turns it into a retail box set if everything goes well. The first step, however, is to hit that 10,000 vote mark, which you can help HH Bricks reach by voting for their MOC on the LEGO Ideas website here!

The post DIY LEGO ‘Connect 4’ Brickset lets you actually play the game after building it! first appeared on Yanko Design.

Retro iMac G3-style AirPods Max takes inspiration from Apple’s most colorful tech era

Sure, the AirPods Max come in colors – but there’s something so cold and un-emotional about anodized aluminum. It grabs your eye, but then immediately lets your eye wander once your fingers have run past its cool matte surface. Aluminum’s only purpose was to help build devices that were sleek and thermally advantageous. The problem, however, is that the AirPods Max aren’t ‘sleeker’ than your average headphone. Again sure, the MacBook Air looks so much thinner than the other average laptop – but aluminum in headphones achieves nothing. It adds weight, makes the head feel heavy, and doesn’t even look as eye-catching as some of its plastic-based counterparts.

Saffy Creatives recognized this and decided to give the AirPods Max a rather fitting makeover. After reinventing the Apple Watch as a G3-inspired retro-dream, they’re back with a redesign for the AirPods Max that looks oh-so-gorgeous it makes me want to try licking the headphones – obviously in a non-creepy way.

Designer: Saffy Creatives

What Saffy Creatives did is clever because it doesn’t change the AirPods Max silhouette – just its material treatment. Fair warning, the images ARE made using AI, but to be honest, AI is used more as a rendering tool here than it is as an imagination aid. The device looks exactly the same, except the parts made from metal are now replaced with dual-tone transparent/translucent plastic. The headphones here adopt Apple’s iconic Bondi Blue color scheme, with the outer cans giving a look into the headphones’ inner mechanics (just as Jobs intended with the iMac G3). A cloudy white element breaks the transparent shell, adding almost a halo of sorts around the can while also meaningfully separating the materials that would be probably impossible to injection-mold otherwise.

The old colorful Apple logo also finds itself on both the outer cans – something Apple wouldn’t be caught dead doing with their metal headphones. Is the detail almost too distracting? Some Apple purists would probably say it is – but nobody buys headphones because they look boring. Every audio-lover worth their salt wants headphones that make a noise, whether it’s through audio drivers, or through visuals.

The rest of the headphone remains fairly the same. The cups stay exactly the way they originally were, with the 3D mesh we’ve come to love. Similarly, the headband retains its mesh cushion too, however, the outer plastic frame also gets translucent/cloudy white plastic treatment to match the overall vibe. The result is a pair of headphones that are as gorgeous as any of Apple’s turn-of-the-millennium products – when Jobs and Jony Ive probably had more fun than they ever had making products.

Obviously such a pair of headphones will never exist (and I do wish Nothing had done a better job with their transparent design), but if there’s some maverick YouTuber looking to mod the AirPods Max, this weirdly nostalgic build is definitely worth a shot. After all, it’s nothing a 3D printer could churn out in a few hours. You’re not really changing the geometry either – just the material.

The post Retro iMac G3-style AirPods Max takes inspiration from Apple’s most colorful tech era first appeared on Yanko Design.

Top 5 Reasons the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow Is Built for Open-Plan Homes With Mixed Flooring

Most robot vacuum-mop combos on the market right now do an acceptable job on light dust and can push a damp pad across hardwood, but ask them to handle a real kitchen spill or a week’s worth of tracked-in dirt from a dog, and the cracks start to show. Streaky floors, damp patches that take twenty minutes to dry, wheel marks through the mess, and mop pads that smell like a gym locker after three days. The promise has always been “set it and forget it,” but the reality for most owners involves regular pad washing, manual spot cleaning, and a nagging sense that the robot is just redistributing grime rather than actually removing it. Homes with kids, pets, or open-plan layouts where the kitchen flows into the living room need more than a technical pass, they need floors that are genuinely clean and dry enough to walk on immediately.

Roborock’s answer to that gap is sitting on the show floor at CES 2026, and it is called the Qrevo Curv 2 Flow. Positioned as the brand’s first “Real Clean Challenge” hero product, it is engineered specifically around what North American households actually throw at a robot vacuum: sticky spills, pet messes, carpets next to hard floors, and the expectation that a thousand-dollar machine should not become another maintenance project. The pitch centers on “real dry and real clean” performance, delivered through a one-pass roller-mop system, automatic wet/dry carpet separation, and a dock that handles most of the gross maintenance work without intervention. What follows is a walkthrough of the five things that stand out most after watching it run through Roborock’s booth demos, with an eye on what actually matters once this machine is navigating a real living room.

Designer: Roborock

1. One-Pass Roller Cleaning That Actually Looks Finished

The centerpiece is a 270mm-wide roller mop, noticeably wider than the typical 180mm rollers on most competitors. That extra width means fewer passes to cover the same area, and in booth demos running over simulated coffee spills and muddy pet prints, the difference is visible. The system applies 15N of downward pressure (roughly 2.5 times the previous model, equivalent to about 1.5kg of force) combined with 220 RPM rotation, so the roller scrubs rather than just wipes. Where shorter rollers leave streaks or require a second pass, this one clears the mess in a single stroke and moves on.

What keeps it from smearing dirty water around is the SpiralFlow real-time self-cleaning system. Eight precision hydration points distribute clean water across the roller while a built-in floating scraper removes excess moisture and channels dirty water into a separate wastewater tank. The four-step process (hydrate, control moisture, scrub, collect) happens continuously while the robot moves, so every pass uses a relatively fresh section of roller. The floating scraper automatically adjusts to the roller surface, unlike fixed scrapers on track-mop designs that apply uneven pressure and leave streaks. In controlled spill tests, floors look finished after one pass and dry to the touch within a couple of minutes.

2. Carpets Stay Dry, Even When You’re Not At Home

Before the robot reaches a carpeted area, the roller lifts up to 15mm off the floor while a roller shield simultaneously extends to cover the mop, creating a physical barrier that blocks both moisture and dirt from transferring onto carpet fibers. The system works with carpets up to about 13mm pile height, and for taller rugs, the app lets users set custom behaviors. In the demo setup with a kitchen runner adjacent to tile and a living room area rug, the robot transitions cleanly between surfaces without leaving visible damp spots on carpet edges, which is usually where most robots fail.

That edge transition matters for homes with mixed flooring, especially where a spill on hard floor sits right next to a rug. Most two-in-one robots either roll onto the rug and react (leaving damp edges) or force users to draw manual no-go zones around every carpet. The shield solves that by keeping the wet roller physically separated during the entire crossing, rather than relying solely on lift height.

3. Edge Cleaning Without the Baseboard Crunch

Getting close to walls has always been a trade-off: stay back and leave a visible dirt line, or bump repeatedly into trim and sound like the robot is attacking the baseboards. The Qrevo Curv 2 Flow uses an edge-adaptive roller mop that extends outward to reach within about 10mm of the wall, rather than relying entirely on side brushes. The precision extension mechanism activates when the robot detects an edge, allowing the roller to cover areas that would normally be missed without requiring the entire robot body to press against the wall.

In booth demos around skirting boards, TV cabinet legs, and furniture corners, the coverage is noticeably better than non-extendable designs, which typically leave a 2-3cm gap that accumulates dust. The other advantage is noise and wear. Robots that compensate for short rollers by repeatedly bumping into walls create scraping sounds and can scuff paint over time. The extendable design means the robot maintains a few millimeters of clearance while still getting the roller right up to the edge, reducing both noise and long-term cosmetic damage.

4. Hair Management That Doesn’t Turn Into Weekly Surgery

The DuoDivide main brush uses a split design with two counter-rotating arms that move hair from both ends toward the center, cutting transport distance in half. At the center gap, the two brushes spin at slightly different speeds, creating a differential effect that tears apart bundled hair rather than letting it wrap into a solid ring. A precision scraper strips the hair off, and high-flow suction pulls it into the dustbin. After a simulated hair test at the booth (long hair and pet fur spread across hard floor and low-pile carpet), the brush remains visibly clean with no wrapping at the ends and no hair stuck in the dustbin inlet.

The side brushes use dual lifting arc designs with an asymmetrical spiral arc shape. As the brush rotates, centrifugal force pushes hair outward toward the bristle ends instead of letting it spiral inward toward the hub, and a soft rubber baffle at the base blocks hair from wrapping around the mounting point. Both side brushes also lift automatically when switching to mop-only mode or approaching wet messes, preventing them from getting caked with damp debris. Whether the zero-tangle performance holds up over weeks in a real home is the open question, but the engineering choices are mechanically sound approaches to the hair problem.

5. A Dock That Cleans Like a Mini Washer, Not Just a Parking Spot

When the robot returns to wash its roller, the dock first drains the dirty water from the previous clean, then rinses the roller with fresh water, rather than back-washing dirty water into the roller. While the roller is being cleaned, it alternates between forward and reverse rotation while dual scrapers comb through the fibers from both directions. The dock heats wash water to 75°C (Roborock claims 99% bacteria removal) and runs 55°C warm air drying afterward to prevent mildew and odor. Intelligent dirt detection monitors how dirty the water is during washing, and if it detects heavy soiling, it automatically extends wash duration and can trigger the robot to return to heavily soiled areas for an additional mopping pass.

The dock handles auto dust emptying with a 2.5L bag capacity (roughly 65 days under typical use), and more importantly, the roller, roller shield, dirty water tank, and dock base are all designed for quick removal and manual cleaning. Unlike competitor docks with non-removable shields and narrow gaps that accumulate hidden grime, everything that touches dirty water can be pulled out and rinsed. The trade-off is complexity: more sensors, more moving parts, and likely higher consumable costs. But the design philosophy is clear: take on more of the maintenance burden at the dock level so the user does not have to babysit the system daily.

The post Top 5 Reasons the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow Is Built for Open-Plan Homes With Mixed Flooring first appeared on Yanko Design.

Tired of AI filters and endless selfies? Retro‑styled Await Camera makes you wait 24 hours to see your photos

Your smartphone camera lets you take 47 photos of the same sunset, delete 46 of them, and still feel like something’s missing. Rolling Square’s new Await Camera takes the opposite approach. You get 24 shots across three rolls, no preview screen, and a full day before you can even see what you captured. The Swiss company unveiled this retro digital camera at CES 2026, pricing it between $70 and $100 as part of a subscription service that prints and ships your chosen photos.

Waiting feels revolutionary in 2026. Await forces you to consider each shot before pressing the shutter, then sit with your choices for 24 hours while the photos sync to the cloud and “develop.” Only after that delay can you review what you captured, select the keepers, and wait again for physical prints to arrive at your door. This deliberate friction contradicts every principle of modern digital photography, yet that’s precisely the point. Patience, not megapixels or computational processing, separates memorable photos from forgettable ones.

Designer: Rolling Square

The design language screams disposable camera aesthetics but with actual build quality behind it. Rolling Square went with a translucent lower body that shows off the internals, which feels very Y2K revival but somehow works here. The top fascia snaps off and comes in colors that would make a highlighter jealous: yellow, lime green, turquoise, cobalt blue. At 98 x 67.5 x 15.5mm and just 95 grams, this thing disappears in your pocket. The front keeps it minimal with a viewfinder, xenon flash (yes, actual xenon, not LED), the lens, and a tiny speaker grille. Flip it over and you get a small OLED display showing your remaining shot count, another viewfinder window, and an orange shutter button. That’s the entire interface. No menus, no settings, no mode selection hell.

Rolling Square stripped out everything people actually hate about photography in 2026. There’s no “share to Instagram” button begging you to post immediately. No WhatsApp integration pushing you to dump photos into group chats. No sticker library, no caption prompts, no AI restyling that makes everything look like it passed through the same algorithmic blender. Await functions as a camera, period. You point, you shoot, you move on with your life. The three-roll system divides your 24 photos into eight-shot chunks, creating natural break points that encourage thinking in sequences rather than spray-and-pray shooting. The OLED counts down your remaining exposures, which creates this low-key anxiety that actually improves your photography because suddenly you care about composition again.

Here’s where it gets interesting. After you burn through your shots, you connect Await to your phone and the photos upload to the cloud. But you can’t view them for 24 hours. Rolling Square artificially enforces this development window, and honestly, it’s the smartest friction they could have added. That delay prevents you from judging your work in the moment, which means you approach editing with fresh eyes instead of deleting anything that doesn’t match your initial expectation. Film photographers lived with this for decades and somehow produced the most iconic images in history. Maybe instant feedback actually makes us worse at evaluating our own work.

Once the 24 hours pass, you open the app and see your roll. Now you pick which shots deserve to become physical prints through the subscription service (monthly or annual plans, though Rolling Square hasn’t dropped exact pricing yet). Selected photos get printed and shipped to your address, which adds another waiting period between shooting and holding the final product. The whole process can span a week or more, turning photography back into something that produces tangible objects rather than files that die in your camera roll. Physical prints demand different engagement. You can stick them on a fridge, write on the back, hand them to someone, lose them in a drawer and rediscover them years later. They exist independent of devices, batteries, or cloud services, which gives them staying power that Instagram stories will never match.

Rolling Square hasn’t announced a firm release window, although the crowdfunding campaign should launch any time around end of January or the first half of February. Pricing allegedly will land between $70 and $100 for the hardware, plus subscription costs for the print service. The target audience seems to be people exhausted by infinite scroll and computational perfection, which describes roughly everyone under 30 and most people over it. Await won’t replace your smartphone or convince serious photographers to ditch proper gear, but for specific moments when you want to shoot more thoughtfully than another burst of instantly-forgotten phone snaps, this approach makes sense. Patience rarely feels like a feature until you realize how completely you’ve lost it.

The post Tired of AI filters and endless selfies? Retro‑styled Await Camera makes you wait 24 hours to see your photos first appeared on Yanko Design.

CES 2026’s Loudest Flex: Brane Party Pro Hits The Bass Notes So Hard I Actually Got Goosebumps

There’s a specific moment that happens when you first hear deep bass done properly. Your brain needs a second to process what’s happening because the sound doesn’t match what you expect from a speaker that size. I experienced that exact moment at CES 2026 while listening to Brane Audio’s Party Pro prototype, and for the sake of the rest of the hotel guests, Brane only limited the demo to 10 seconds and played its audio at 25% capacity. The sound is so thundering (especially the base notes), Brane had to quite literally hold its speaker back to avoid noise complaints.

Brane Audio structured their CES presentation strategically, starting with the Brane X to establish their credibility against established competition. Then they unveiled the Party Pro, and the difference was staggering. The low-end reproduction didn’t just sound powerful; it revealed details in familiar tracks that had been buried under inadequate bass response for years. Only after the demo did they mention the kicker: we’d been listening to a single RAD2 driver at half capacity. The shipping version with two drivers will hit four times harder, which means this might legitimately be the first speaker good enough to make your neighbors consider moving.

Designer: Brane Audio

That single driver, the RAD2, is the whole story here. It’s the second generation of their Repel-Attract Driver tech, and the numbers are just absurd. They claim a 30-fold deep-bass advantage over conventional drivers, which sounds like marketing fluff until you hear it for yourself. The genius is in how it handles the lowest frequencies. Instead of just producing a generic boom, it articulates the bass, letting you hear textures and notes in the sub-100Hz range that are usually a muddy mess. You start hearing things in your favorite songs you swear were never there before, which is a wild and slightly surreal experience.

Closer look at the RAD2 Driver

The way it prepares for that bass is mechanically fascinating. The original RAD driver in the Brane X used a small air pump to create the necessary pressure differential. For the RAD2, they’ve engineered a system of small mechanical legs that physically push the driver cone outward to prime it before the music even starts. This pre-tensioning creates the pressure needed for its massive excursion without the lag or potential noise of a pump. It’s a clever bit of electromechanical engineering that solves a very specific physics problem, and watching it happen is almost as impressive as hearing the result. It’s a purely functional design choice that looks incredibly cool.

This level of mechanical control allows for some seriously smart audio processing. Brane’s team explained that the speaker’s internal DSP analyzes the incoming audio in real-time to identify the resonant frequency of each specific track. It then adjusts the driver’s behavior to perfectly match that frequency, essentially tuning itself to every song it plays. This is a huge leap beyond simple EQ presets. The speaker is actively collaborating with the music, ensuring that the bass response is not just powerful but also perfectly in sync with the artist’s original intent. It explains why the bass felt so integrated and clean, rather than being a loud, detached layer on top of the music.

So you take that resonant frequency matching, add the mechanical priming system, and then remember the demo was at quarter-power. The final Party Pro, with its two drivers, will displace a full 1000cc of air, which is an immense amount of sound pressure from a portable enclosure. Brane is essentially breaking Hofmann’s Iron Law, that old rule about deep bass, small boxes, and power efficiency being mutually exclusive. They’ve found a way to have all three. This technology is a new blueprint for how to generate low-frequency sound. I walked away from that demo feeling like I’d just seen the audio equivalent of the first flat-screen TV. The Party Pro will hit shelves later this year, with a price range between $1000 and $1500. You honestly may need to take permission from your Homeowner’s Association before you buy one!

The post CES 2026’s Loudest Flex: Brane Party Pro Hits The Bass Notes So Hard I Actually Got Goosebumps first appeared on Yanko Design.

From Alarm Clocks To Minimal Phones: How Mudita Is Building A Calm “Anti‑Ecosystem” For Digital Detox

Mudita is a company that focuses on minimalism and mindfulness in technology, a rare philosophy in an industry that relentlessly chases engagement metrics and data monetization. At CES 2026, while competitors showcased AI-powered everything and sensor-packed gadgets, Mudita’s booth felt like a calm oasis in the chaos. CEO Michał Stasiuk explained that most people quickly grasp the concept behind Mudita’s products when they hear what the company does, noting that “most of our conversations here were with people who, you know, when they hear what we are about, what we are doing, what the product is about, they do get the concept.”

The real challenge, Michał acknowledges, isn’t explaining the philosophy but implementing behavioral change: “The difficult part is to actually implement the usage in their own lives because it’s a trade-off between the convenience and the less usage of the device and the peace of mind.” We sat down with Michał to discuss how Mudita positions itself as the antidote to big tech’s attention economy, why the company deliberately avoids AI, and how it’s building trust with consumers who are burned out and skeptical of technology promises.

Mudita Kompakt

Trading Convenience for Calm in a Sensor-Saturated World

CES 2026 was dominated by products cramming sensors into everything, trying to capture data at every opportunity. Mudita stands in stark contrast, deliberately avoiding data gathering and Google APIs. When asked how it feels to be such an outlier, Michał responded positively, explaining that visitors “do get the concept” fairly quickly. The philosophy resonates because people recognize the problem in their own lives, even if acting on it requires uncomfortable changes.

The company frames its products as a deliberate trade-off: “It’s a trade-off between the convenience and the less usage of the device and the peace of mind so the difficult part for them is to actually use the screen less and use the phone less for their benefit but with the trade of convenience.” This honesty about sacrifice sets Mudita apart. Rather than promising effortless transformation, they acknowledge that reclaiming attention requires genuine commitment and a willingness to forego some modern conveniences.

Michał cited sobering statistics: “The average screen time is above six hours a day in the US.” He suggested that all that time could be spent elsewhere, “doing other stuff,” emphasizing that “this device is designed for that purpose of reducing the screen time.” By acknowledging the scale of the problem without sugar-coating the solution, Mudita positions itself as the company willing to say what others won’t.

Band-Aids vs. Built-In Guardrails

The interviewer characterized messaging from Apple and Google about mindfulness and digital well-being as “putting a band-aid on a problem that is actually a really big problem,” noting that their corporate ethos centers on data gathering. Michał agreed, pointing out that big tech companies acknowledge the problem by implementing screen-time controls, which means “they are admitting that the issue is there, right?” However, he argued their implementations are “less efficient” because “you can disable the screen time limitations with no problem whatsoever on your device any time you like.”

Mudita’s approach hardens the constraints: “The device that we’ve made can be much more efficient in that regard. Because when you’re making a decision to use our phone instead of, for example, iPhone or Samsung, it’s much more difficult to break the habit of not using the phone so much.” The key difference? “You cannot disable the limitation on this device.” This is product design as commitment device, locking users into healthier patterns by removing escape hatches.

The business model distinction is fundamental: “The main difference is that the business model of large companies is set to monetize the data, for example, and to make the device as appealing as possible. So our device is designed not to be as appealing as possible, rather it’s designed for our users, clients, to do what they need to do on the phone and then move on.” The goal is to free up time “in life, spending their time elsewhere, doing actually meaningful things instead of staring at the phone, whatever brings joy to them and not spend so much time using a phone.”

Recognition Arrives Fast, Habits Follow Slowly

Michał noted that “the niche is growing and quite fast,” with significantly more awareness in recent years: “What we’ve seen for the last couple of years is definitely more awareness and people get the concept now. Most of the people understand the concept now.” He contrasted this with a few years ago when “it wasn’t the case,” meaning the minimalist phone category had to overcome basic comprehension barriers that no longer exist.

Regulatory momentum supports this shift. Legislators, psychologists, and even big tech insiders are talking about “serious damage happening and mental damage and psychological damage happening with these devices that are constantly taking our attention.” Michał highlighted parental demand as a key driver, noting that “in the last year 2025 there were three phones released on the market designed solely for the purpose of digital minimalism.” The market is validating Mudita’s early bet.

Yet Michał tempered expectations about speed: “I wouldn’t say that the change is very fast in terms of consumer habits because the consumer habits take long time to change much longer but in terms of understanding the issue I would say that everybody agrees.” Many visitors tell him the phone is something “someone would buy for their children” because “a lot of parents are concerned with the screen time of their children so actually they are looking for solutions.” Understanding precedes action, and the gap between the two is where Mudita must operate.

Mudita Bell 2 & Harmony 2

Old Problems Don’t Need New AI

At a show where AI appeared in “literally every product now,” including “an AI alarm clock” and “an AI toaster,” Mudita’s CEO was blunt: “We do not see any need for AI usage in the products that we are creating so far, because the problems we are trying to solve do not require AI, like for example in the alarm clocks, the problem we are trying to help to solve is better sleep and to improve sleep which is harmed by extended use of mobile devices like phones before going to bed.”

He explained that people “scroll for three hours before they go to sleep and this can disturb the sleep and circadian rhythm,” and that Mudita’s alarm clocks use “e-ink display like the phone does and for that reason it does not emit any blue light right so you do not need to look at the blue light before you go to bed.” The solution is material science and interface design, not machine learning. Solving sleep disruption doesn’t require algorithms; it requires removing the stimulating screens that prevent sleep in the first place.

Michał clarified the stance isn’t ideological: “We are not against AI in general but until now there wasn’t any need to use AI.” It’s a refreshing example of technology restraint, deploying tools only when they serve a genuine purpose rather than chasing trends. By avoiding AI where it’s unnecessary, Mudita reinforces its core message that more technology isn’t always the answer.

How Mudita’s Design Language became Instantly Recognizable

When asked about Mudita’s distinctive design DNA, Michał described the unifying principles: “In every product that we are making we are aiming for similar outcomes for example we want to create simple products we want to create products that are easy to use and easy on the eyes without any eye strain so we design all of our interfaces to be pleasant not very cluttered without any jumping elements.” The aesthetic is functional, driven by the goal of reducing cognitive load and visual stress.

He elaborated on the interface philosophy: “In our phone we design the user interface not to have any popping up notifications that could be disturbing and to be as simple as possible and black and white aesthetics are very good fit for that purpose and E Ink displays are also very good fit for what we are trying to achieve without the blue light emission and black and white interfaces.” The monochrome palette isn’t a stylistic flourish; it’s a deliberate choice to make devices less stimulating and more restful to look at.

Rather than building a data-sharing ecosystem, Mudita envisions “an ecosystem but of a different sort,” where devices like alarm clocks work well with lamps “that will have colors adjusted for bedtime like for example you can have warmer colors without any blue light emission.” Importantly, “there is no need for data transfer between those two devices,” and the philosophy is “if they can solve an issue or solve a problem being simple there is no need for us to complicate things with the massive ecosystem that’s not needed.” Simplicity, kept simple.

Transparency as the Trust Strategy

Given that potential customers “have a problem with big tech because they’ve had issues of their own whether it’s data breaches, whether it’s mental health exhaustion or any sort of anxiety,” the challenge for Mudita as “ultimately a tech company” is “how do you win their trust when they’re already so skeptical?” Michał’s answer centers on transparency: “What we are trying to do is to be transparent so basically what you see is what you get okay we are describing our products on our marketing information like, explicitly saying what they are what they are not just to make sure that every important information is out there communicated.”

The company uses community feedback to calibrate disclosure: “We have a forum that people are very active and this is like a source of information for us, what’s important to them, what information should be disclosed and so on,” adding that “it’s not always obvious for us what people are looking into.” Additionally, “what we are trying to do is to deliver what we say when we announce it, so if we announce that there is going to be released with some changes, we are doing everything we can to deliver exactly those changes in exact time that we promised our clients and community.”

Michał summed up the philosophy: “We are doing our best to be as transparent as we what you see is what you get what you see is what you get this is this is like something is a model yes.” By contrast to big tech’s opacity and broken promises, Mudita offers radical honesty about capabilities, limitations, and timelines. Trust isn’t assumed; it’s earned through consistent delivery and clear communication about what the products can and cannot do.

The post From Alarm Clocks To Minimal Phones: How Mudita Is Building A Calm “Anti‑Ecosystem” For Digital Detox first appeared on Yanko Design.

Rotary blades, tank treads, cyclone airflow: Lymow One Plus robot mower bets everything on cut quality

Robotic lawn mowers don’t fail because they lack autonomy – they fail because owners stop trusting them. Missed patches, unexpected downtime, edge-case breakdowns: these are the reasons robotic mowing still hasn’t fully replaced traditional mowers on large and complex lawns. Lymow One Plus addresses that trust gap head-on. An evolution of Lymow’s tank-tread, boundary-free mower that has already attracted attention for its rotary mulching blades and steep‑slope capability. The new model builds on its predecessor with targeted hardware and software enhancements, including sharper SK5 blades, an improved airflow system, and advanced AI algorithms. For homeowners with demanding lawns, that means more confidence that the mower will get the job done right.

On the CES floor in Las Vegas, Yanko Design’s Radhika Seth sat down with Lymow co‑founder Charles Li to unpack what “replacement‑grade” actually means. Across the conversation, a few themes kept surfacing: ruthless user‑centric research, a willingness to admit and fix first‑generation flaws, and an almost stubborn insistence on “appropriate technology” over spec‑sheet theater. Lymow One Plus is the hardware expression of those values.

From Lymow One to One Plus, a mower built to actually solve North American yards

Charles describes Lymow One Plus as nothing less than a ground‑up evolution of the original product. “Lymow One Plus is a comprehensive upgrade of Lymow One,” he says. “It delivers a fundamental step up in cutting performance, stability, and long‑term reliability, while becoming noticeably smarter in complex, real‑world yard conditions.”

The target is very specific. Lymow One Plus is “a mower built to genuinely solve problems for large and complex lawns in North America, and increasingly, globally.” Instead of chasing flashy AI tricks, the team went back to first principles. “We didn’t design it to showcase flashy intelligence. Instead, we went back to the first principles and asked a very simple question. What does the user ultimately care about? The answer is very straightforward. Cut the grass short, and well, consistently, without hassle.”

That framing also ties into timing. Robotic mower penetration in North America is still under 5 percent as of 2025, and Charles is blunt that “no one is really successful in the robotic lawn market in the US” yet. The team sees 2026 as a genuine inflection point and wants Lymow One Plus positioned as the product that makes skeptical homeowners comfortable crossing the chasm.

Road‑tripping for R&D, and why a startup can ship what big brands will not

Charles makes it clear that Lymow One Plus is not the result of a whiteboard exercise. He talks at length about the legwork behind the company’s user research. “We’ve traveled through the U.S. I have visited more than 10 states. I’ve spoken to more than 30 families, three hours each one,” Charles explains. “You touch the grass through your own hands. You listen to the users from the deep, from your heart.”

That qualitative research is layered on top of a fairly serious engineering pedigree. “We do have very good accumulation in R&D,” Charles says. “Hardware level, mechanical design. Software level, we do have our accumulation, our autonomous algorithm. Our software team, most of our software team are from autonomous driving industry.” This is the same toolkit used to keep cars between lane markings, now repurposed to keep a mower reliably on task in a yard with patchy GPS and changing light.

There is also a cultural angle: Lymow is deliberately leaning into what a startup can do that a large appliance company often cannot. Charles contrasts their top‑down product decisions with the risk‑averse committees he remembers from his big‑company days, where “the quality manager is going to say, hey, you don’t have reference data” and after‑sales teams push back on anything too unconventional. For Lymow One Plus, that freedom shows up in choices like a front‑mounted mulching deck and tracked treads that would be harder to push through a conservative roadmap.

“Appropriate technology,” not tech for tech’s sake

When asked about Lymow’s long‑term vision, Charles does not talk about AI, RTK, or connectivity first. He talks about time. “Our core vision has always been using the best, or let’s say the most appropriate technology to give people their time back, to make them truly hands‑free,” he says. “Not to show off those fancy technology, but to understand what users need. We tend to say the most appropriate technology, rather than the best technology.”

That philosophy also reframes the yard itself. “A yard should be an extension of the home,” Charles notes in the same breath. If the home has already been transformed by robot vacuums and smart locks, Lymow wants the yard to feel similarly invisible in terms of maintenance, without forcing homeowners to become part‑time robotics engineers.

Specs are treated as a means to that end, not the end itself. Near the close of the interview, Charles relays something “from the bottom of our founder’s heart”: “Specs can tell you what a product is capable of, but they rarely explain how it feels to live with it… What truly earns trust is solving real problems in a pragmatic way, paying attention to small details, and delivering a level of reliability users can depend on day after day.” For Lymow One Plus, he says, “many of its most important [things] don’t stand out on a spec sheet, but users will feel them in how consistently the model works, how little friction it adds to daily life, and how thoughtfully it handles edge cases.”

Redefining “all‑terrain” around real backyards, not demo slopes

“All‑terrain” has become a throwaway phrase in outdoor robotics marketing. Charles is visibly wary of that. “Marketing is kind of tricky,” he says with a laugh. “A lot of manufacturers or lots of brands tend to use those, how can I put it, extreme words. Yeah, I can do everything. People use that in marketing words. ‘All terrain’ is a very strong word. It means a lot. It actually means a lot.”

For Lymow, redefining it started again with fieldwork. North American yards, they found, are not just about inclines. They are about unpredictability. Open lawns with exposed tree roots, mole and rabbit holes, swings, trampolines, and informal forest edges became the true baseline, not edge cases. “In North America, these aren’t edge cases, but they are the baseline. So they became the scenarios we absolutely refused to fail at,” Charles says.

Grass type is another non‑negotiable benchmark. The team evaluated more than a dozen common cool‑ and warm‑season grasses, including thick, tough varieties that will quickly expose underpowered blades. That research directly informed Lymow’s rotary mulching blade system, which is designed to maintain cut quality across that diversity, not just on manicured test plots.

Fixing wet‑mowing failures and rebuilding the cutting system from the inside out

One of the most candid portions of the interview comes when Radhika asks what feedback from Lymow One directly shaped Lymow One Plus. Charles does not sugarcoat it. “One of the issues reported was our hub reliability during wet mowing conditions,” he admits. “In our first generation, the grass clippings could accumulate and eventually kind of damage the hub motor. We’re honest for this.” The response came in two stages. First, interim fixes and even unit swaps for affected early adopters. “For the people that are suffering this issue, we already swapped some new Lymow One units for them,” Charles notes. Mandy adds that it only affected a small number of users, but was taken seriously precisely because they did not want it to happen to anyone.

For Lymow One Plus, the team went much further. “We added dedicated debris shields to significantly reduce grass clippings and introduced scraping guards to prevent the clippings from getting trapped. And also we increased our motor strength by more than two times. Altogether, this changes fundamentally, entirely resolve these issues rather than masking it.” Underneath, the cutting system itself has been re‑architected. The cutting chamber volume has been expanded by roughly 50 percent, creating the airflow headroom needed for more aggressive mulching. Peak cutting power is up by about 50 percent as well, paired with SK5 industrial‑grade blade steel and redesigned geometry that generates a cyclone‑like airflow to lift grass before cutting. “When the blade is rotating, the grass will lift up, so you’re going to have a clean, even cut,” Charles explains.

Side discharge has also been rethought. Instead of leaving visible windrows, the Lymow One Plus deck is tuned to blow clippings out in a more even pattern. “We just kind of blow the grass clipping to make sure it’s not in the line… so in this case it’s healthier for your lawn,” Charles says. “You don’t have grass clippings in the line, but you have, like, an average… so that’s healthy.” Functionally, all of that shows up in three scenarios the team calls out as major improvement areas: wet and rainy mowing, heavy growth (long grass and dense weeds), and leaf‑heavy autumn yards. With the new airflow and power, Lymow One Plus can now lift and mulch thick vegetation that previously needed more favorable conditions or manual intervention, and it shreds fallen leaves more effectively so homeowners can “have a relaxed autumn.”

Why Lymow thinks Lymow One Plus can lead the category, not just join it

Asked to deliver a 30‑second elevator pitch against premium competitors, Charles narrows it down to three claims. “We’re the first one using rotary blades, multi‑rotary blades, the best cutting capability. And we’re the first one who can support the slope of 45 degrees, 100 percent, so let’s say the best climbing capability. And we mow up to 1.73 acres per day in our testing environment. So that’s an industry‑leading cutting efficiency.”

Those are bold numbers, but he quickly pivots back to something less easily quantified: trust. Lymow is not especially interested in feature‑by‑feature comparison charts. “We don’t spend much time positioning ourselves feature by feature against premium competitors,” he says. “What Lymow does is understanding user needs and systematically improving real user experience. So for us, more importantly, it’s the market education. It’s a heavy job, honestly, it’s a heavy job.”

That combination of specs and stance might be what makes Lymow One Plus interesting in a sea of CES robots. On paper, it is a tracked, rotary‑blade mower that climbs 45‑degree slopes, handles over an acre and a half per day, and navigates without boundary wires. In conversation, it is a case study in how a young hardware brand can own its mistakes, obsess over edge cases, and still talk about something as unsexy as “low friction daily life” with conviction.

If CES 2025 was Lymow’s coming‑out party for the original One, CES in Las Vegas now feels like the moment the company starts arguing not just that robot mowers can replace traditional ones, but that they should be held to the same standard of reliability and cut quality. Lymow One Plus is the company’s attempt to prove that out, one tricky backyard at a time.

The post Rotary blades, tank treads, cyclone airflow: Lymow One Plus robot mower bets everything on cut quality first appeared on Yanko Design.

Govee’s Gaming Pixel Light now lets you generate 8-bit animated GIFs using AI Prompts: Hands-on at CES 2026

We have quickly grown accustomed to asking AI to write our emails or create stunning headshots for our LinkedIn. This incredible interaction has lived almost exclusively on our computer and phone screens, a fascinating but ultimately contained experience. The real question has always been when this creative AI would break free from the flat display and start interacting with our physical environment. That moment appears to be arriving now, and it is starting with, of all things, a desk lamp that can generate its own art.

Govee’s implementation of its AI Lighting Bot 2.0 in products like the Gaming Pixel Light is a clever and surprisingly practical application of generative AI. It transforms a simple smart light into an intelligent art creator that anyone can use. The ability to generate custom GIF animations just by typing what you want to see is a game-changer for ambient lighting and personalization. This technology moves far beyond simple color cycling or pre-programmed scenes, offering a clear glimpse into a future where our smart devices are not just responsive, but genuinely creative partners.

Designer: Govee

And let’s be honest, the idea initially sounds a bit like a solution searching for a problem. But the hardware itself makes a compelling case. The Gaming Pixel Light is a dedicated 52 by 32 pixel canvas, which is a perfect, low-stakes resolution for the kind of quirky, lo-fi art that generative models excel at creating. It is not trying to render a photorealistic scene; it is built for the exact brand of retro, 8-bit nostalgia that defines so many gaming setups. The fact that it can run these animations at a smooth 30 frames per second means your text prompts result in genuinely dynamic visuals, not some clunky, stuttering slideshow. Govee’s dual-plane pixel engine even allows for layered designs, so the AI has a surprisingly deep toolkit to play with.

We saw a demo of a campfire GIF on the Gaming Pixel Light and it really did look like something out of a Game Boy Color or an 8-bit game come to life. We even tested the feature on Govee’s curtain lights although the Gaming Pixel Light’s compact form factor (and targeting towards a gaming audience) made it a perfect canvas for this feature. All you do is enter a prompt and Govee’s AI Lighting Bot 2.0 not only creates the image, it renders an animation, and applies it to the lights seamlessly. Everything happens through an app, and for the most part, there are certain limitations/censorships in place so that you don’t generate images that are offensive or inappropriate. Govee hasn’t capped the number of generations per month, but they did mention that future versions will allow iterative tweaking of the GIFs. For now, it’s very WYSIWYG and an image that’s generated can’t be ‘edited’. Govee’s tip, however, is to be as thoroughly detail-oriented with your prompting.

What makes this system particularly interesting is how Govee has tailored the AI interaction to the hardware. For graphic displays like this pixel light, it is a “single-turn” interaction: you type a prompt, you get a GIF. It is direct, fast, and avoids the conversational baggage that would feel tedious for a purely visual output. This is a smart distinction from how the AI works with their linear strip lights, which allows for more complex, multi-turn conversations about mood and color. It shows a level of thoughtful design that recognizes different products demand different interfaces. This is the kind of ambient computing that actually feels useful, turning a passive decorative object into an active, personalized art station that constantly evolves with your imagination.

The post Govee’s Gaming Pixel Light now lets you generate 8-bit animated GIFs using AI Prompts: Hands-on at CES 2026 first appeared on Yanko Design.