Tag Archives: Apple

These MacOS-inspired flip flops are weird, playful, and sadly don’t come with Apple “Find My”

Posted on by

The mind of David Delahunty is something no LLM can capture. With the speed most marketing teams would be envious of, David churns out idea after idea on his Instagram, turning brands and visual icons into fun products that creatively challenge how you look at logos, shapes, and designs. We’ve covered a bunch before, including an MS Paint-inspired makeup kit, along with this Finder icon-inspired backpack. A recurring theme in Delahunty’s collection, the Finder icon ‘finds’ itself in a new avatar this time – interlocking flipflops.

A lot of his designs lean on heavy visual puns, which make for great eye-candy on Instagram, but on rare occasions they make for great products too! Delahunty’s made MacOS Finder-inspired necklaces (which you can still buy, btw), and it’s about time that these flipflops enter the production hall of fame too. They’re fairly uncomplicated, molded as a single-piece polyurethane flip-flop, with left and right units being blue and white respectively. And no, a Latina mother throwing these at a misbehaving child wouldn’t classify as ‘Airdrop’.

Designer: David Delahunty

When Bill Hernandez and Steve Jobs designed the original Finder icon, I doubt they realized what meme material it possessed. The icon is innately memorable, but it’s also easily reproducible as different products – Delahunty’s flipflops are a great example. The icon is split into two, making it perfect to turn into flipflops, although that weird jagged central cut is a sort of unique challenge when it comes to wearability. However, with a fair amount of planning, it’s easy to account for the fact that the flipflops aren’t entirely bilaterally symmetrical. I guess that’s the beauty about them.

Each shoe is made the same way Crocs are – molded as a single piece with no interlocking, stitching, or gluing of extra parts. This makes each flipflop incredibly strong, fairly comfortable, and long-lasting. The flipflops in question come with cutouts that depict the Finder icon’s face too, which I think is a great idea because they serve as ventilation, so your footwear doesn’t smell like death because the polyurethane isn’t particularly breathable. The cutouts are great for airing the footwear out after a day at the beach too, although try not to get sand into them through the cuts – it’s no fun dealing with gritty shoes rubbing against your feet like literal sandpaper.

Delahunty’s mind works much faster than most people’s hands, so a lot of his ideas get mocked up using AI (it’s honestly one of the best examples of AI enhancing someone’s workflow). That being said, a lot of tweaking needs to be done before these shoes hit production. If you do want to wear your love for macOS on your feet, however, give Delahunty a follow on Instagram and be sure to drop him a message!

The post These MacOS-inspired flip flops are weird, playful, and sadly don’t come with Apple “Find My” first appeared on Yanko Design.

Why the $1,099 MacBook Air M5 beats the MacBook Neo for macOS 27

Posted on by

Apple’s 2026 laptop lineup presents a clean, almost philosophical choice. On one side sits the MacBook Neo, a machine built around the powerful idea of access. It lowers the barrier to entry, putting a capable Apple notebook within reach of more people than ever. It is a compelling argument rooted in the present, designed to solve an immediate need for a good, affordable computer. For a few hundred dollars more, the M5 MacBook Air makes a different promise, one that is less about immediate savings and more about long-term value and capability.

For months, that choice felt ambiguous, a simple trade-off between price and power. The arrival of macOS 27, however, brought a new clarity to the decision. Apple’s vision for the next generation of its operating system, with its heavy reliance on sophisticated on-device AI, reframed the entire lineup. The question is no longer just about what you need today, but about which machine is properly equipped for the software you will be using tomorrow. The Neo gets you in the door; the M5 Air gets you a seat at the table.

Designer: Apple

The M5 chip is what separates these two machines, and that difference stands out far more now than it did at launch. Apple announced the M5 MacBook Air in March with doubled base storage and modest performance gains, framing it as a solid evolutionary update. The M5 features a 10-core CPU and up to a 10-core GPU, but the real story lives inside those GPU cores. Each one includes a Neural Accelerator, a dedicated AI processing unit that dramatically increases the machine’s ability to handle on-device machine learning tasks. Apple explicitly positioned the M5 Air as capable of delivering up to 4x faster performance for AI tasks than the M4 Air, and up to 9.5x faster than the M1 generation. Those numbers were abstract in March. After WWDC, they became a requirement.

macOS 27 Golden Gate leans heavily on Apple Intelligence, the company’s suite of AI-powered features that process data locally rather than relying on cloud servers. Visual Intelligence, enhanced Spotlight with conversational AI capabilities, and system-wide machine learning workflows all depend on silicon that can handle the computational load without slowing down everyday tasks. The M5’s architecture was designed specifically to support this kind of workload at scale, making it the baseline for an uncompromised experience. Apple described the M5 Air as capable for Apple Intelligence across apps and system experiences, as well as for running large language models on device in enterprise environments. The Neo, with older silicon, may technically run macOS 27, but the gap between eligibility and capability is the entire value argument for spending more.

The storage equation also tilts decisively toward the M5 Air. Apple doubled the base configuration to 512GB, up from the 256GB that previous generations started with. That increase addresses one of the most persistent criticisms of Apple’s entry-level pricing strategy, particularly as on-device AI models require significant local storage to function properly. Larger machine learning models, extensive photo libraries processed with AI features, and the general expectation that a 2026 laptop should have breathing room all make 512GB feel like the real starting point. The $100 price increase over the previous M4 Air generation is easier to justify when half of it is effectively the cost of storage you would have upgraded to anyway. The Neo’s storage configuration was not surfaced in available reporting, but if it follows typical budget laptop patterns, it likely sits closer to the older 256GB baseline, which immediately creates friction for users planning to lean into Apple’s AI-forward software vision.

The M5 Air launched in March to a relatively muted reception, with early reviews treating it as a competent, predictable update rather than a transformational product. That framing was accurate at the time, because the machine’s value was not yet fully apparent. WWDC changed the story by revealing what the M5 was actually designed to do. The real product was never just the laptop; it was the laptop as a vessel for a more intelligent operating system. The Neo, by contrast, remains a strong value for users whose needs are defined by today’s software, but it starts to look underpowered the moment you project forward even a year.

The MacBook Air M5 is where Apple’s 2026 Mac story begins to feel aligned with its software ambitions. It is not the cheapest way into the ecosystem, but it may be the cheapest way to avoid compromise as macOS 27 arrives this fall. The Neo has its place, but for anyone planning to live on this machine for the next three to five years, the M5 Air is the safer, smarter, and ultimately more cost-effective choice. You can preorder both machines now through Apple’s website, but only one of them feels like it was built for the operating system Apple just announced.

The post Why the $1,099 MacBook Air M5 beats the MacBook Neo for macOS 27 first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Ugliest Thing in Your EDC Kit is your AirTag. This Japanese Carabiner Finally Fixes That

Posted on by

There is a specific kind of frustration that comes with building a carry kit piece by piece over months, selecting each object for a reason, and then clipping on an AirTag that looks like it came in a party favor bag. The titanium pen, the slim card wallet, the knife with the stonewashed blade that earns its spot every single day – and then that silicone loop. The coherence collapses, and we know it the moment it happens.

In 2026, the AirTag accessory market has split at a visible fault line. On one side: the standard silicone loop Apple sells for $29, the Spigen Rugged Armor case, and a range of injection-molded plastic clips that treat the tracker as a packaging problem rather than a design opportunity. On the other: a smaller group of manufacturers asking what kind of object an AirTag deserves to travel inside. That question is driving a genuine shift in carry culture right now, separating the kits assembled with intention from the ones that stopped one decision short.

After handling and carrying all three material variants across several weeks of daily use – commute conditions, trail carry, and air travel – the AirTag Carabiner is the most considered tracker carrier we have tested in this category.

Three Materials, Three Different Arguments

The AirTag Carabiner is made in Japan and individually hand-crafted. It comes in three materials: Duralumin composite alloy, untreated Brass, and Stainless Steel, and each variant makes a different argument for itself.

  • The Duralumin at 0.59 ounces – roughly the weight of a standard coin – is for those who account for every gram in a cycling kit or trail pack. It is, practically speaking, weightless in use.
  • The Brass at 1.7 ounces develops surface character over time that neither alternative will.
  • The Stainless Steel at 2 ounces carries its weight as a tactile signal of permanence.

The Brass variant arrives with a warm matte surface that shifts toward a richer patina at contact points within the first few weeks of carry. The Stainless Steel reads as deliberately neutral – a finish that recedes into a bag’s existing hardware rather than competing with it. The Duralumin sits between them: a cool, slightly satin surface that holds its character rather than developing one. Each variant is visually distinct enough that the choice of material is also a choice about what the rest of the kit communicates.

Sized for Motion, Not the Display Case

At 3.1 inches by 1.6 inches, the carabiner is sized for function without excess. The 0.2-inch profile means it sits flat against a zipper pull or bag strap rather than protruding outward to snag on jacket fabric, handlebar bags, or adjacent gear in a pack. For cyclists on a commute or a weekend ride, that profile matters in motion.

For travelers moving through terminals with carry-on luggage, it is one fewer point of friction in a sequence of movements that accumulates quickly across a long travel day.

Why the Alloy Choice Actually Matters

The Duralumin alloy deserves specific attention because it is not a decorative material reference. It belongs to the same alloy class used in aircraft, spacecraft, and marine applications – a pairing of low mass and high tensile strength that explains why the carabiner weighs 0.59 ounces without sacrificing structural integrity.

Applied here, it produces a carrier suited for the conditions an active kit already operates in: salt air, rain, altitude, and the sustained mechanical stress of a clip opened and closed hundreds of times a year. This is not a material chosen for its name. It is a material chosen because its properties match the job.

What Hand Production Means at This Scale

Hand production in Japan means finishing tolerances are set by a maker, not a mold. Carrying the AirTag Carabiner’s Duralumin variant daily for three weeks made that difference concrete: the gate action is consistent across hundreds of openings, the edge quality where the alloy meets at its joins has no rough transition point, and the surface shows none of the micro-scoring that injection-molded carriers typically develop within the first month of use.

These are details that do not appear in a spec sheet and do not become visible in product photography. They register in the hand, and they compound over time. At six months of daily carry, an object built to a specification and one built to a price have separated completely.

Where It Delivers

For the weight-optimized active carry: At 0.59oz – roughly a coin’s worth of mass – the Duralumin variant adds nothing measurable to a cycling pack, trail kit, or camera bag. It is the only tracker carrier in this category that does not undo the weight discipline a considered kit has already established.

For outdoor and travel conditions: The alloy’s documented suitability for water and high-altitude environments means this carabiner performs alongside the gear it clips onto – from a salt-air coastal commute to a pressurized cabin – without corrosion or gate fatigue.

For carry coherence: The hand-finished construction and material quality place this carabiner alongside machined pens and precision wallets without asking the rest of the kit to lower its standard.

What to Factor In

The Apple AirTag is not included. At $119 starting for the AirTag Carabiner alone, the full system investment clears $150 once the tracker is added. That is the honest cost of entry and should be weighed against a kit where every other object has been selected at a comparable standard.

The weight spread across variants is significant: 0.59oz for Duralumin versus 2oz for Stainless Steel – a 3.4x difference across identical dimensions. Users attaching this to a keychain or wrist lanyard will feel that gap in daily carry and should choose their variant before ordering rather than after.

The standard for AirTag carry has been a $29 silicone loop. The AirTag Carabiner sets a different standard: machined-quality construction, aircraft-grade material, and hand finishing that holds up to daily inspection after a year of use. Whether that standard becomes the category norm depends on whether the rest of the market decides the AirTag deserves to be treated as a permanent part of the kit rather than a temporary addition to it.

The AirTag Carabiner is available now starting from $119 at Yanko Design.

The post The Ugliest Thing in Your EDC Kit is your AirTag. This Japanese Carabiner Finally Fixes That first appeared on Yanko Design.