Tag Archives: Apple

The best laptops you can buy in 2026, tested and reviewed

Posted on by

Choosing the best laptop can be a bit of a challenge, especially when “good enough” now covers everything from entry-level Chromebooks for college students to premium machines built for serious multitasking and heavier creative work. Specs can blur together fast, but a few basics still matter, like processing power, battery life and whether you’re getting enough storage for the long haul. For many people, that means looking for something that lands in the sweet spot with modern ports, a solid display and at least a 512GB SSD so you’re not juggling external drives a month after you bring your new laptop home.

Out of all of the notebooks we've tested and reviewed recently, we consider Apple's 13-inch MacBook Air M4 to be the best laptop for most people, and this is still the case for our top picks to start off the new year. It's powerful enough to handle most tasks (even light video editing); it has a great screen and built-in speakers; and its battery could last over 18hours (depending on what you're doing, of course). The MacBook Air M4 is also one of the lightest and thinnest systems we've reviewed, and it's dead silent, thanks to a fanless design.

Of course, not everyone wants a MacBook, and there are excellent Windows laptops and Chromebooks out there, too. Windows systems offer a range of configurations, from budget to high-end UHD screens with stunning IPS panels that boast high nits for vivid brightness. Chromebooks, on the other hand, tend to be more affordable and are great for users who mostly work online. Whether you need a powerhouse for creative work, a compact system for note-taking, or a laptop that can handle family movie night, there’s something for everyone in today’s laptop market.

Depending on the type of laptop you’re looking to buy, there are some specs we think you should look for to get a machine that’s powerful enough for your needs and future-proof for the next couple of years (at least). Here's a cheat sheet for you to use when you're shopping.

  • At least M2 processor

  • At least 16GB of RAM

  • At least 256GB of SSD storage

  • The most recent generation processor available from Intel or AMD

  • At least 16GB of RAM

  • At least 256GB of SSD storage (512GB SSD is a safer baseline if you plan to keep lots of files locally)

  • Intel Core i processor

  • At least 8GB of RAM (4GB is the bare minimum for a basic Chromebook)

  • At least 128GB of storage, preferably a SSD

  • At least AMD Ryzen 9000 series or Intel 14th Gen Core CPU

  • At least 16GB of RAM (ideally 32GB if you can swing it)

  • At least 1TB of SSD storage

  • For GPU recommendations, check out our guide to buying the best GPU for your needs

  • The most recent generation processor available from Intel or AMD

  • At least 8GB of RAM

  • At least 256GB of SSD storage (consider a 512GB SSD if you can swing it)

Engadget has been reviewing laptops for two decades, and while the definition of what a portable PC is has changed considerably since, our obsession with testing their limits and serving up informative buying advice remains the same. Be it a hybrid tablet like Microsoft's Surface machines, a rotating 2-in-1 convertible like HP's Spectre x360s or a plain old clamshell notebook, our review process follows similar beats. How does it look and feel? How fast is it? Whether it’s a Windows device powered by an Intel Core i5 or higher, a MacBook or a Chromebook, we aim to answer the most important question: Is it actually worth your hard-earned cash? We also pay close attention to portability, webcam quality and display features, including IPS panels and nits of brightness, as they can make a big difference in daily use.

There's a good chance you've already committed to an operating system, but my advice is to be as flexible as possible. These days, most major software is compatible with both Macs and PCs. (Of course, it's another story if you've become dependent on an Apple-only app like Final Cut Pro.) Web-based apps, naturally, will work on any platform with an internet browser.

If you're an Apple-loyalist, there aren't many reasons to consider Windows laptops (unless you want a secondary gaming machine). But for Windows users, macOS is becoming more tempting every year. Apple's MacBooks, powered by its M-series Silicon chips, are among the fastest and most efficient laptops we've ever seen. They're incredibly well-built and have outstanding battery life to boot. MacOS itself is also an easy platform to learn, especially if you're used to iOS and iPadOS.

That brings up another point: iPhone users may want to consider Macs because of the seamless integration with Apple's other platforms. You can't respond to iMessage conversations easily or hop into FaceTime chats on Windows PCs, but doing so is simple on Macs. (Microsoft's Phone Link app lets you send iOS users individual texts, but not media or group chats.) Android users, meanwhile, may be better off with Windows, as Phone Link can make calls, synchronize all your texts and also access your phone's photos.

If cloud gaming is your priority, Windows laptops with NVIDIA’s GeForce Now or Xbox Cloud Gaming compatibility may offer more flexibility and decent performance, especially when paired with fast internet speeds. Chromebooks also make a compelling case here as an affordable, lightweight solution for casual cloud gaming sessions.

As for whether you’ll want a PC with a dedicated Copilot AI button on the keyboard, that depends on how often you see yourself using Microsoft’s generative tools. Given we’re only just seeing the first slate of AI PCs, it would be wiser to wait out the hype and see what improvements might come over time.

And what about ChromeOS? Chromebooks are a smart and (typically) inexpensive way to do things like web browsing and hopping on a few video chats, but for most, they're not the best choice as a primary computer. There aren't many apps or games that work offline, and they also don't work with powerful software suites like Adobe's (you can use the stripped-down Adobe Express and Photoshop online tools, though).

Chromebooks are great secondary machines to use alongside a more powerful Mac or PC, and they're popular in schools because they're cheap and easy for IT workers to manage. And if all you need is web browsing access, or a notebook for a kid, a Chromebook might be enough.

If, for some reason, you’re looking for a powerful ChromeOS system, there are also Chromebook Plus models to consider. These machines sport faster processors and more RAM than typical Google notebooks, and they can also tap into a few of the company’s online AI features, like AI image generation and photo processing.

You can expect to spend between $1,000 and $1,800 for a new laptop these days, depending on the configuration. If you're looking for more of a workhorse, that could cost you well over $2,000 for additional RAM, storage, as well as a beefier graphics card and CPU. But you can also find some good laptops under $1,000 if you're willing to overlook build quality (or buy a refurbished or previous generation machine, which we highly recommend). For entry-level systems, you’ll often have to decide whether you’d rather prioritize processing power or storage, especially if 512GB SSD upgrades bump the price. Systems with AMD chips tend to come in cheaper than their Intel counterparts, but the bulk of their cost will come down to other components like RAM and storage.

I’ve included our favorite affordable model in this best laptop buying guide, but we have a list of the best budget laptops that you can check out as well.

So how portable do you want your laptop to be? That's the ultimate question you need to ask when choosing between various screen sizes. 13-inch machines have become a solid starting point for most shoppers — it's enough real estate for the majority of tasks like emailing and writing, and it also helps keep machines relatively light (typically between two to three pounds). Thanks to manufacturing advancements, these dainty machines sometimes even come with larger screens (the smaller MacBook Air actually has a 13.6-inch display).

If you have trouble seeing fine text, we’d recommend going for a display larger than 13 inches. ASUS’s Zephyrus G14 is a solid 14-inch option for gamers, and we’re also seeing more productivity-focused machines aim for that size, like the Dell 14 Premium and MacBook Pro. While 14-inch notebooks are a bit heavier than 13-inch models, coming in between three to four pounds, their screens are noticeably roomier.

For artists, or anyone else who needs a large canvas, a 15-inch laptop may make the most sense. They typically weigh between 3.5 and 4.5 pounds, but that extra heft may be worth it to fit wider video editing timelines or Photoshop windows. And, as you'd expect, you'll also pay a bit more for a 15-inch notebook compared to smaller ones (the 15-inch MacBook Air starts at $1,199, while the smaller model goes for $999). PC makers are also replacing 15-inch systems with 16-inch versions, which will give you even more space to work.

If you're in the market for a business laptop, size and portability might be key considerations. A lightweight yet powerful system with a long battery life can make a world of difference if you travel frequently for work.

You can still find laptops with 17-inch or 18-inch screens, but those are typically gaming systems or souped-up workstations. They're not meant for mere computing mortals.

These days, most laptops ship with a few USB-C ports, which can handle both charging and speedy data transfers. Apple's MacBooks also include a separate connection for MagSafe power, and you'll find custom power connections on some PCs like Microsoft's Surface. Older USB Type-A connections are less common now, but they still pop up in systems like HP's Spectre x360 14, as well as many models from ASUS.

For gamers or creators who rely on discrete graphics, ensuring your laptop has the right ports for external monitors or GPUs is crucial. DisplayPort or HDMI connections can also ensure you’re ready for dual- or multi-screen setups for more immersive experiences. Similarly, if you want to save high-resolution files or install multiple games, you might need to consider additional hard drive space; external hard drives are pretty affordable, as long as you have a proper port to connect them.

If you're a fan of wired headphones, it's worth keeping a close eye on headphone jack availability. They usually include a USB-C to 3.5mm adapter, but that's a clunky solution, and it also takes up a USB port. Sure, most people use wireless earbuds and cans today, but it's still helpful to have a wired one around for when those devices run out of juice.

Most laptops today offer Wi-Fi 6 or 6E and Bluetooth 5.0 or later, which should mean faster and more stable connections if you have compatible routers and devices. While Wi-Fi 7 routers have started appearing, that spec hasn't made its way into laptops yet. As for cellular coverage, there are notebooks like the Surface Pro 9 and Samsung Galaxy Book models that offer integrated 5G. But from our testing, that feature may not be worth the cost of a separate data plan. Instead, you could tether to your smartphone or invest in a wireless hotspot that can keep multiple devices online.

A laptop's battery life depends on several factors: The power draw from the screen and other hardware, the optimizations used to avoid unnecessary power drain, and, of course, the size of the actual battery. One of our previous favorite systems, the Dell XPS 13, lasted 13 hours and 15 minutes in the PCMark 10 battery benchmark. In real-world testing, I was able to use it for a day and a half without needing a recharge. The MacBook Air 13-inch, meanwhile, more than 18 hours in our benchmark and kept running for more than two work days of my typical workflow. In general, you should expect a modern laptop to last at least eight hours.

If battery life is your absolute priority, I'd strongly suggest looking at Macs over Windows PCs. Apple's M-series chips are essentially mobile hardware, with all of the power efficiency you'd expect from something originally designed for phones. Qualcomm’s upcoming Snapdragon chips could help Windows PCs compete with Apple’s astonishing battery life, but we’ve yet to see those in action. Chromebooks also typically get decent battery life (as long as you don’t overstuff them with power-draining tabs).

A laptop's refresh rate refers to the amount of times its screen is cycled every second. Modern displays like IPS LCDs and OLEDs support 60Hz refresh rates at a minimum, but we're seeing more devices offering 120Hz, 240Hz and beyond. The higher the number, the faster the screen is refreshed, which ultimately leads to a smoother experience while mousing around or scrolling through web pages. (If you want to get a sense of what a slow refresh rate looks like, just grab an e-reader like the Kindle and try to flip between book pages.)

While high refresh rates used to be reserved for gaming laptops, nowadays we're seeing more mainstream machines like the Dell 14 Premium offer 120Hz (or variable rates that move between 60Hz and 120Hz).

If you’re buying a new laptop, you’ll want to make sure it’s powered by the latest CPUs so you’re not short on processing power a year from now. For Windows PCs, that includes Intel’s Core Ultra chips for thin-and-light machines or the 14th-gen HX chips for beefier systems. The Core Ultra series have NPUs for handling AI tasks, while the HX hardware does not – they’re based on Intel’s previous chip architecture, and they’re more focused on delivering raw horsepower. Intel's older 13th-gen and 12th-gen laptop chips also don't have NPUs, so keep that in mind if you're looking at used systems.

You'll also see AMD's Ryzen 8000 and 9000 chips in plenty of new systems like the ASUS Zephyrus G14 and Razer Blade 14. Those CPUs mainly target gaming laptops and high performance systems, while you'll still find AMD’s older Ryzen 7000 chips in ultraportables. AMD's main advantage is that its chips also include Radeon graphics, which are far more capable than Intel's Arc hardware (though those are getting better).

Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon X Elite and X Plus are also an option in Copilot+ PCs (more on those below). Since they’re based on mobile chip designs, they’re likely also more power efficient than AMD and Intel’s hardware. In the past, we’ve avoided recommending Snapdragon chips because they led to a slow and frustrating Windows experience. But Microsoft claims it’s rebuilt Windows 11 around Snapdragon’s Arm-based architecture, which should lead to far faster performance and better app compatibility.

As for Apple's laptops, you'll be choosing between the M4 Pro, M4 Max and M5, each of which is progressively more powerful.

On the graphics side of things, a GPU, or graphics processing unit, is the component that communicates directly with a laptop's display. Laptop CPUs all have some form of integrated GPU: Intel has either its standard graphics or beefier Arc hardware, while AMD's chips include fast Radeon mobile graphics. If you want to play demanding games at high speeds (measured in frames per second, or fps), or if you need some extra power for rendering video or 3D models, you can configure a laptop with a dedicated GPU like NVIDIA's RTX 40-series hardware or AMD's Radeon RX 7000. Just be sure to leave room in your budget if you want a powerful GPU, as they typically add $300 or more to the cost of a laptop.

Apple's M-series chips, meanwhile, have GPU cores that can perform as well as NVIDIA’s and AMD's lower-end dedicated GPUs. That's quite the accomplishment for systems like this (especially the MacBook Air and 14-inch MacBook Pro), and it's another reason we highly recommend Apple's notebooks.

Simply put, an AI PC is a computer equipped with a neural processing unit (NPU), which is designed to handle AI-related tasks. Much like how GPUs tackle heavy-duty gaming and rendering workloads, NPUs are designed to handle the complex math necessary for AI workloads. They’re also far more power efficient than CPUs or GPUs, which could lead to better battery performance in laptops. While many factors go into NPU performance, for the most part we measure their potential speed by TOPS (tera operations per second).

We were primed for AI PCs based on the chips Intel and AMD announced in 2023. Intel unveiled its "Core Ultra" CPUs in December, its first to include an NPU for AI work. AMD also announced its Ryzen 8040 AI mobile chips that month (and it couldn't help but say they were faster than Intel's new hardware). But in May, Microsoft announced its Copilot+ initiative, which is pushing major PC makers to deliver premium AI PCs with specifications including 16GB of RAM, 256GB SSDs and NPUs with at least 40 TOPS of AI performance.

Copilot+ is more than just a marketing term: Microsoft is also launching AI-powered features in Windows 11 that take advantage of powerful NPUs. That includes Recall, which can help you locate anything you’ve done on your PC (whenever it finally launches), as well as Cocreator in Paint, which can generate AI images based on text prompts and doodles.

If you buy an AI PC that isn’t Copilot+ certified, you’ll still be able to use some features like Windows Studio Effects, which can blur your background in video calls or keep you in frame. Developers like Adobe and Audacity are also building features into their apps that can take advantage of NPUs.

At the time of this post, Chromebook Plus notebooks can also access a few of Google’s online AI features, like image generation and photo processing.

The ThinkPad X9-14 Aura Edition is a great spiritual successor to the ThinkPad X1 Carbon, offering the best that business laptops have to offer. That includes long battery life packed into a thin and light chassis. This is an optimal ultraportable business laptop.

While the price might give you some pause, we tested the lowest configuration, and found that the X9-14’s performance is excellent for casual business users. The only issue with quality is that the keyboard is lacking. It’s mushier than we’d like, which could get a bit tiresome throughout the day. You’ll still miss out on a USB Type-A port, so you may need to carry a Type-C hub with you.

Where the ThinkPad X9-14 will win you over is its bold OLED screen. Combo that with its well-rounded audio, and the ThinkPad X9-14 makes for an excellent multimedia device in and out of the workplace.

Aside from its lovely OLED screen, the ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED doesn't stand out from the crowded laptop field in any way. It just looks dull and boring, especially compared to the strikingly beautiful ASUS Zephyrus G14, which also came out this year. While you can probably find the Zenbook 14 for a decent price, I'd recommend holding out for something with a bit more personality (and with a less wobbly screen hinge).

The Razer Blade has almost everything you'd want in a 14-inch gaming notebook, but it's far pricier than the Zephyrus G14 on this list, and it doesn’t even have an SD card reader. It would be a solid competitor once its price falls a bit, and it's certainly a great option if you just have to have a jet-black laptop.

Framework gave its modularity magic to the Laptop 16, delivering a gaming notebook where almost every single component is user replaceable. But you'll have to pay a pretty penny to snag it with upgraded hardware, and its optional Radeon 7700S GPU was surprisingly slow.

The Alienware m16 r2 has been revamped with a slimmer case, but it’s otherwise a fairly typical gaming laptop. It’s a solid option for Alienware fans, but you’ll find better hardware and deals elsewhere.

The Zenbook Duo is a fascinating dual-screened notebook, and according to my colleague Sam Rutherford it’s the first of its kind that’s worth buying. But its unique hardware isn’t really meant for mainstream consumers, and Windows 11 still doesn’t support multi-screen setups well enough to make full use of the Zenbook Duo’s ample canvas.

Dell’s XPS 16 is big and beautiful, but it’s far too expensive compared to the competition. Plus, it uses a capacitive row of function keys that you basically can’t see under bright light and has too few ports for a machine of this size.

See Also:

It’s hard to come up with an average battery life for laptops, since that will ultimately depend on what you’re doing with them. An ultraportable like the MacBook Air that sips power can last around 20 hours in our battery benchmark, and around two full work days of real-world usage. But a gaming laptop may last only a few hours if you’re actively playing something while on battery. At this point, Macs are delivering far better battery life than PCs, thanks to Apple’s Silicon chips, but Microsoft claims Copilot+ systems with Qualcomm chips will also get over 20 hours of batter life.

The more RAM you have, the more things your computer can do simultaneously. For that reason, we recommend buying PCs and Macs with at least 16GB of RAM. That gives you enough memory to have several applications open at once, as well as web browsers filled with RAM-hogging tabs. Many PC games also require at least 16GB of RAM. While you could use a system with 8GB of RAM for basic tasks, you’ll quickly run into slowdowns and error messages as your apps stack up. Many laptops, especially ultraportables, don’t let you upgrade RAM, too – so you’ll have to buy an entirely new computer if you didn’t equip enough memory at the start.

If you’re a hardcore gamer, programmer or planning to render videos or 3D models, then you may want to go for 32GB of RAM or more. And if you just need a secondary laptop for lighter work – perhaps a no-frills system for writing – then you can probably get by with 8GB. Just be sure to keep those browser tabs in check.

There is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to laptop storage. You’ll typically find configurations between 256GB and 1TB SSDs (solid state drives) on most laptops, and I’d recommend most people get at least 512GB. That’ll be enough space for large apps, music and video files without stressing your system too much. If you’re a media hoarder, or want to play a ton of games, then it’s definitely worth getting a 1TB SSD.

If you’ll mainly be streaming your shows and music, and would rather invest in RAM or other hardware, then 256GB of storage would be serviceable. I’d recommend staying away from any machine with 128GB of storage though. Most of that will be taken up by the operating system, and you’ll likely run into issues cramming in large apps after a few months.

We recommend springing for extra built-in storage or investing in a portable SSD for backing up your most important files. It's also worth noting that Chromebooks tend to come with less built-in storage — 32GB, 64GB or 128GB — since ChromeOS encourages users to save their files in the cloud rather than on the device. In that case, 128GB is plenty.

You can expect to spend between $1,000 and $1,800 for a typical 13-inch laptop today. As I explained above, you'll pay more if you want to stuff in more RAM or better GPU hardware. But you can also find deals below $1,000 if you look for refurbished or older-generation models.

Simply put, macOS is the operating system in all of Apple's notebooks and desktops, while Windows powers the vast majority of PCs. You'll also find Chromebooks running Google's ChromeOS, but those are basically just web browsers running on top of Linux.

Debating the differences between Windows and Macs is something PC nerds have been doing since the '80s, so we won't be declaring a winner here. There are some small, negligible distinctions, like using a Command versus a Control key, how file explorers work and concerns about viruses and security. For the most part, those are minor issues or have become moot thanks to better built-in security.

But if you care more about playing the newest games, you'll want to have a Windows system. If you're more focused on creative apps, like Photoshop, Premiere and Final Cut Pro, then macOS may be a better fit (especially if you're running an iPhone).

There is no single "best" laptop brand, but judging from this guide alone, we're generally impressed by notebooks from Apple, Dell and ASUS. They all offer fast, reliable and sturdy machines. HP also makes some eye-catching devices if you want an option that’s the most aesthetic. Those four brands, along with Lenovo and Acer, dominate laptop sales worldwide. We'd avoid systems from any retail store brands, or companies that don't have a major presence in the US.

October 2025: Updated to add the latest MacBook Pro.

September 2025: Added a new "specs to look for" section.

August 2025: Updated our top picks to include the Dell 14 Premium.

May 2025: Updated to ensure top picks and details are still accurate.

March 2025: Updated to include the M4-powered MacBook Air.

November 2024: Updated to include the M4-powered MacBook Pros.

August 2024: Updated to include the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/laptops/best-laptops-120008636.html?src=rss

Apple unveils Gen 2 AirTag with louder speaker and 50% more tracking range

Posted on by

Apple has just launched a new AirTag, an update to its item-tracking accessory that has been around since 2021. The second-generation device is, as you would expect, better and bolder. It carries two primary distinctions: a better speaker and a wider range, which we will (in addition to other new features) discuss in detail below.

Apple AirTag has been on the market for five years now. It is still the most reliable and go-to device for most people looking to secure their belongings, including, but not limited to, luggage, keys, wallets, and bags. Dubbed the second-generation AirTag, the new item-tracker is powered by the same second-generation Ultra Wideband Chip that Apple has previously outfitted the iPhone 17 and the Watch Ultra 3 with.

Designer: Apple

Courtesy of an upgraded Bluetooth chip, the Gen 2 AirTag expands its range of Precision Finding by a good 50 percent and adds more reliable directional guidance to it, which means users will now be able to track their lost items from a much further distance. In addition to the range, the new AirTag features a much louder speaker. Users can get audio cues up to almost 50 percent louder than the original AirTag. The device also delivers haptic feedback and features directional arrows to lead you more conveniently to your lost but tagged item.

According to the reports released in the run-up to the launch of the second-gen AirTag, it was mulled that Apple would introduce a new design for its device. Apple has, however, stayed true to its original design and has instead focused on improving the features of the item tracker.

The Cupertino tech giant has put user privacy at the core of the development of its new AirTag. Within the associated Find My network, the device protects against unwanted tracking, and it comes with end-to-end encryption. A new feature within the Find My network is Share My Location. The feature allows users to temporarily share the location of any accessory tagged with the AirTag with a select group of people of their choosing. This can be particularly beneficial in case of misplaced luggage, for instance, a person can share the location of their tagged item with the airline staff and help recover faster.

Even though the look and feel, as well as the battery size of the AirTag haven’t changed, the device is now made from recycled materials. The casing comprises 85 percent recycled plastic, and it features 100 percent recycled rare-earth magnets and 100 percent recycled gold-plated circuits. Apple informs that the second-generation AirTag will require iPhones running iOS 26 or later, while the Precision Finding will be usable on Apple Watch Series 9 or Apple Watch Ultra 2 or later. Despite the upgrades, the second-gen AirTag, like its predecessor, costs $29 in the U.S. A pack of four will retail for $99.

The post Apple unveils Gen 2 AirTag with louder speaker and 50% more tracking range first appeared on Yanko Design.

The best Apple Watch accessories for 2026

Posted on by

The right accessories can transform your Apple Watch into the best workout companion, a stylish timepiece and everything in between. Whether you’re looking to upgrade its style, recharge its battery quickly or make it even more convenient to use on the go, there’s an accessory out there that can help. From a stylish sport loop that keeps things comfortable during workouts to a sturdy charging stand for your bedside, there are plenty of ways to enhance your experience.

Apple has a few Watches at this point: the flagship model, the Ultra 2 and the Watch SE, and you can find accessories for any and all of them — many of which won’t break the bank. If you’re always on the go, a power bank with wireless charging can help keep your watch topped up without needing to hunt for an outlet. No matter which Apple Watch you own, the best accessories can make daily use more seamless and add a little extra style and functionality along the way.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/accessories/best-apple-watch-accessories-133025270.html?src=rss

The best GPS running watches for 2026

Posted on by

Having the right GPS watch on your wrist whether you’re going for your first ever run or your umpteenth run can make all the difference. The best GPS running watches not only keep track of how far you’ve run, but they track pace and other real-time metrics, advanced training features to help you hit your goals and, of course, precise distance measurements. Some models even provide offline maps for navigation, sleep tracking, recovery insights, and smart features that “regular” smartwatches do.

For those who need extra durability and lasting battery life, higher-end sport watches — like some of the best Garmin watches — are built to handle intense workouts, harsh weather and long runs. If you're training for a marathon, triathlon or just want a multisport option that can keep up with your lifestyle, these watches have the tech to support you.

With so many options available, from entry-level models to the best running watches packed with advanced running metrics, it can be tricky to find the right fit. That’s why we’ve rounded up our top picks to help you choose the perfect GPS watch for your training needs.

The Polar Pacer Pro looked and felt quite similar to our top pick, and it mapped my outdoor runs accurately. However, Polar’s companion app is leagues behind Garmin’s with a confusing interface and a design that feels very much stuck in the past. It’s also $100 more expensive than our top pick.

The Amazfit Cheetah Pro tracked my outdoor runs accurately and Zepp’s companion app has a coaching feature much like Garmin’s adaptive training plans that can outline a routine for you to complete in preparation for a race or to achieve a specific goal. My biggest issue with it was that its touchscreen wasn’t very responsive — it took multiple hard taps on the display to wake it, and often the raise-to-wake feature didn’t work, leaving me staring at a dark screen.

The most important thing for a GPS running watch to have is fast, accurate GPS tracking. That might seem obvious, but it’s quite easy to get distracted by all of the other smart features most of these devices have. Since most of them can be worn all day long as standard sport watches, there’s a lot of (possibly unnecessary) fluff that looks good on paper but won’t mean much if the core purpose if the device is left unfulfilled. To that end, I paid particular attention to how long it took each device’s built-in GPS tracking to grab my location before a run, if it ever lost my spot and the accuracy of the generated maps. Also, the device should be smart enough to let you start tracking a run while the GPS looks for your location.

You may not be able to suss out GPS accuracy just by looking at a spec sheet (that’s where this guide can help), but you can check for features like supported workout profiles. That’s something you’ll want to look into, even if your one and only activity is running. Check to make sure the best running watches you’re considering support all the kinds of running activities you like to do (outdoor runs, treadmill runs, etc) and any other workouts you may want to track with it.

Most fitness wearables today aren’t one-trick ponies; you’ll find a healthy number of trackable exercise modes on any sport watch worth its salt. That said, the number of workout profiles can be directly proportional to a device’s price: the higher-end the product, chances are the more specific, precise workouts it can monitor.

In a similar vein, you’ll want to check the trackable metrics of any watch you’re considering before you buy. Since we’re talking about the best GPS running watches, most will be able to track the basics like distance, heart rate and pace, and those are bare minimums. Some watches can monitor additional stats like speed, cadence, stride length, advanced running dynamics, aerobic and anaerobic training effect, intensity minutes and more. If you’re already a serious runner who trains for multiple races each year, or if you're a trail runner who needs elevation and navigation features, you’ll want to dig into the spec sheet of the watch you’re considering to make sure it can track all of your most necessary metrics.

It’s worth checking out a watch’s case size and weight before going all-in on one. GPS running watches, and standard smartwatches as well, can have a few different sizes to choose from so you’ll want to make sure you’re getting the best fit for your wrist. I have a smaller wrist, so I tend to avoid extra-large cases (anything over 42mm or so), especially if I intend on wearing the device all day long as my main timepiece. Weight, on the other hand, is a little less controllable, but typically smaller case sizes will save you a few grams in overall weight.

For those who need durability, particularly trail runners or those tackling extreme conditions, devices like Garmin watches offer rugged builds that can handle rough terrain, impact, and extreme weather.

Unlike regular smartwatches, GPS running watches have two types of battery life you’ll need to consider: with GPS turned on and in “smartwatch” mode. The former is more important than the latter because most GPS running watches have stellar battery life when used just as a smart timepiece. You can expect to get multiple days on a single charge, with some surviving more than two weeks (with all day and night wear) before they need a recharge.

Battery life with GPS turned on will be much shorter by comparison, but any GPS running watch worth its salt should give you at least 10-15 hours of life with the GPS being used continuously. The more you’re willing to spend, the higher that number typically gets, with some GPS running watches lasting for 40 hours while tracking your location.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/wearables/best-gps-running-watch-141513957.html?src=rss

Apple’s Secret AI Pin Looks Like an AirTag and it Might Just Kill The Smartwatch

Posted on by

Representational Image

Apple’s wearable future might not be strapped to your wrist at all. According to new reports, the company is developing an AI-powered pin about the size of an AirTag, complete with dual cameras, microphones, and a speaker. The device would clip onto clothing or bags, marking a deliberate shift away from the smartwatch form factor that has dominated wearable tech for the past decade.

If the rumors prove accurate, this circular aluminum-and-glass device could launch as early as 2027, running Apple’s upcoming Siri chatbot and leveraging Google’s Gemini AI models. The company appears to be betting that consumers want ambient AI assistance without constantly pulling out their phones or glancing at their watches. Whether this gamble pays off remains to be seen, especially given the struggles of similar devices like Humane’s now-defunct AI Pin.

Designer: Apple

Representational Image

The hardware specs sound modest on paper but reveal something about Apple’s thinking. Two cameras sit on the front: one standard lens, one wide-angle. Three microphones line the edge for spatial audio pickup. A speaker handles output. Physical button for tactile control. Magnetic inductive charging on the back, identical to the Apple Watch system. The whole thing supposedly stays thinner than you’d expect from something packing this much capability. What strikes me most is the screenless design, which tells you Apple learned something from watching Humane crash and burn trying to replace phones with projectors and awkward gesture controls.

Representational Image

Because here’s the thing about AI wearables so far: they’ve all suffered from identity crisis. The Humane AI Pin wanted to be your phone replacement but couldn’t handle basic tasks without overheating or dying within hours. Motorola showed off something similar at CES 2026, and demonstrated a level of agentic control that was still in its beta stages but was impressive nevertheless. Apple seems to be taking notes from both the failure of the former as well as the potential success of the latter. A screenless pin that relies entirely on voice, environmental awareness, and audio feedback has clear limitations, which paradoxically might be its greatest strength.

Motorola’s AI Pendant at CES 2026

The timing lines up with Apple’s Siri overhaul coming in iOS 27. They’re rebuilding the assistant from scratch as a proper conversational AI, and they’ve partnered with Google to tap into Gemini models for the heavy lifting. Smart move, actually. Apple’s in-house AI efforts have been mediocre at best, and licensing Google’s tech lets them skip years of expensive catch-up work. This pin becomes the physical embodiment of that strategy: a purpose-built device for ambient AI that doesn’t pretend to be anything else. You clip it on, it listens and watches, you talk to it, it responds. Simple interaction model.

But I keep circling back to the same question: who actually wants this? Your iPhone already has cameras, microphones, and Siri access. Your Apple Watch gives you wrist-based notifications and quick voice commands. AirPods put computational audio directly in your ears. Apple’s ecosystem already covers every conceivable wearable surface area. Adding a clip-on camera pin feels like solving a problem nobody has, or worse, creating a new product category just because the technology allows it. The 38.5-gram weight of competing devices like Rokid’s AI glasses shows manufacturers obsess over comfort, but comfort alone doesn’t justify purchase.

Representational Image

The 2027 timeline is far enough out that Apple can quietly kill this project without anyone noticing, exactly like they did with the Apple Car. They’ve got a pattern of floating ambitious ideas internally, letting engineers explore possibilities, then axing things that don’t meet their standards or market conditions. Sometimes that discipline saves them from embarrassing product launches. Sometimes it means we never get to see genuinely interesting experiments. This AI pin could go either way, and frankly, Apple probably hasn’t decided yet either. They’re watching how the market responds to early AI wearables, gauging whether spatial computing takes off with Vision Pro, and waiting to see if their Siri rebuild with Google’s Gemini actually works before committing manufacturing resources.

The post Apple’s Secret AI Pin Looks Like an AirTag and it Might Just Kill The Smartwatch first appeared on Yanko Design.

We Might Get A Touchscreen M6 MacBook Pro Before GTA 6

Posted on by

So here’s the timeline we’re apparently living in: Apple will ship a completely redesigned MacBook Pro with OLED displays and touchscreens before Rockstar manages to release GTA 6. Let that sink in for a second. A company that refreshes laptops on a predictable yearly cadence is moving faster than a studio working on a game announced in 2022. Industry sources suggest Apple is accelerating development of its M6-powered models, with launch windows now pointing to late 2026 rather than the previously expected 2027 timeline. The shift signals confidence in advancing multiple breakthrough technologies simultaneously, from next-generation display panels to cutting-edge silicon manufacturing.

The irony is delicious because both Apple and Rockstar operate on their own time. They ship when they’re ready, audiences be damned. Except Apple apparently got ready really fast this time. For professionals who have waited through several years of iterative updates, the M6 models promise substantial reasons to upgrade. The combination of OLED technology borrowed from the iPad Pro, potential touchscreen integration, and the performance leap expected from 2-nanometer chips creates a compelling package. Add to this a thinner chassis, refined thermal management, and possibly even cellular connectivity, and the M6 MacBook Pro begins to look like the generational shift many have been anticipating since the original Apple Silicon transition.

Designer: Apple

Representative Image

The rumor mill had most of us penciling in a 2027 launch for the M6 MacBook Pro, giving Apple time to perfect the OLED transition and work through the inevitable supply chain headaches. But production starting early suggests either the technology matured faster than expected or Apple sees competitive pressure building and wants to strike first. My money is on both. The shift signals confidence in advancing multiple breakthrough technologies simultaneously, and when Samsung starts manufacturing panels months ahead of schedule, it means someone with deep pockets is pushing hard. That someone is Apple, and they clearly want these machines out the door before 2027.

The redesign also alleges a shift to tandem OLEDs, the same technology we saw on the iPad Pros last year (which apple called their Ultra Retina XDR Display). Tandem OLED uses two emissive layers stacked on top of each other, which delivers higher sustained brightness, better power efficiency, and dramatically reduced burn-in risk. The iPad Pro already proved this works beautifully. Blacks that actually look black, colors that pop without looking oversaturated, and HDR content that doesn’t feel like a compromised laptop experience. Moving that to a 14-inch or 16-inch panel with different thermal constraints is complex, but Apple’s display team has pulled off harder tricks. The mini-LED panels in current MacBook Pros are excellent. OLED makes them look outdated.

Representative Image

Then Apple is apparently adding touchscreens, which is wild considering how long they insisted touchscreens on laptops were bad design. They weren’t entirely wrong. Gorilla arm is a real problem. Nobody wants to reach up and poke a vertical screen all day. But the implementation details suggest Apple found a middle ground that actually works. Reinforced hinges keep the display stable when you tap it. A hole-punch camera cutout instead of the notch, possibly with Dynamic Island functionality, points to interface elements designed for quick touch interactions. This isn’t about replacing the trackpad. This is about adding occasional touch input for specific tasks where it makes sense, like scrolling through a timeline or adjusting sliders in creative apps.

The M6 chips built on TSMC’s 2-nanometer process could deliver 15 to 20 percent performance gains over M5 while improving energy efficiency. That translates to faster renders, quicker compile times, and snappier machine learning workflows without sacrificing battery life. The real party trick is how Apple might structure the chips with CPU and GPU in separate blocks, allowing more customization in performance configurations. You get exactly the compute power you need without paying for components you’ll never max out. Smart, efficient, very Apple.

Representative Image

Here’s where the joke stops being funny though. These redesigned models will probably only come in Pro and Max configurations initially, with the base model stuck on the old design for another year. That’s Apple’s way of charging a premium while keeping cheaper options available. The iPad Pro jumped about $200 when it got tandem OLED. Expect similar economics here, putting the entry point for a redesigned 14-inch model somewhere around $2,200 or higher. You’ll be able to buy this laptop and play GTA 6 on it via cloud gaming before you can buy GTA 6 natively. What a time to be alive.

The post We Might Get A Touchscreen M6 MacBook Pro Before GTA 6 first appeared on Yanko Design.

We Might Get A Touchscreen M6 MacBook Pro Before GTA 6

Posted on by

So here’s the timeline we’re apparently living in: Apple will ship a completely redesigned MacBook Pro with OLED displays and touchscreens before Rockstar manages to release GTA 6. Let that sink in for a second. A company that refreshes laptops on a predictable yearly cadence is moving faster than a studio working on a game announced in 2022. Industry sources suggest Apple is accelerating development of its M6-powered models, with launch windows now pointing to late 2026 rather than the previously expected 2027 timeline. The shift signals confidence in advancing multiple breakthrough technologies simultaneously, from next-generation display panels to cutting-edge silicon manufacturing.

The irony is delicious because both Apple and Rockstar operate on their own time. They ship when they’re ready, audiences be damned. Except Apple apparently got ready really fast this time. For professionals who have waited through several years of iterative updates, the M6 models promise substantial reasons to upgrade. The combination of OLED technology borrowed from the iPad Pro, potential touchscreen integration, and the performance leap expected from 2-nanometer chips creates a compelling package. Add to this a thinner chassis, refined thermal management, and possibly even cellular connectivity, and the M6 MacBook Pro begins to look like the generational shift many have been anticipating since the original Apple Silicon transition.

Designer: Apple

Representative Image

The rumor mill had most of us penciling in a 2027 launch for the M6 MacBook Pro, giving Apple time to perfect the OLED transition and work through the inevitable supply chain headaches. But production starting early suggests either the technology matured faster than expected or Apple sees competitive pressure building and wants to strike first. My money is on both. The shift signals confidence in advancing multiple breakthrough technologies simultaneously, and when Samsung starts manufacturing panels months ahead of schedule, it means someone with deep pockets is pushing hard. That someone is Apple, and they clearly want these machines out the door before 2027.

The redesign also alleges a shift to tandem OLEDs, the same technology we saw on the iPad Pros last year (which apple called their Ultra Retina XDR Display). Tandem OLED uses two emissive layers stacked on top of each other, which delivers higher sustained brightness, better power efficiency, and dramatically reduced burn-in risk. The iPad Pro already proved this works beautifully. Blacks that actually look black, colors that pop without looking oversaturated, and HDR content that doesn’t feel like a compromised laptop experience. Moving that to a 14-inch or 16-inch panel with different thermal constraints is complex, but Apple’s display team has pulled off harder tricks. The mini-LED panels in current MacBook Pros are excellent. OLED makes them look outdated.

Representative Image

Then Apple is apparently adding touchscreens, which is wild considering how long they insisted touchscreens on laptops were bad design. They weren’t entirely wrong. Gorilla arm is a real problem. Nobody wants to reach up and poke a vertical screen all day. But the implementation details suggest Apple found a middle ground that actually works. Reinforced hinges keep the display stable when you tap it. A hole-punch camera cutout instead of the notch, possibly with Dynamic Island functionality, points to interface elements designed for quick touch interactions. This isn’t about replacing the trackpad. This is about adding occasional touch input for specific tasks where it makes sense, like scrolling through a timeline or adjusting sliders in creative apps.

The M6 chips built on TSMC’s 2-nanometer process could deliver 15 to 20 percent performance gains over M5 while improving energy efficiency. That translates to faster renders, quicker compile times, and snappier machine learning workflows without sacrificing battery life. The real party trick is how Apple might structure the chips with CPU and GPU in separate blocks, allowing more customization in performance configurations. You get exactly the compute power you need without paying for components you’ll never max out. Smart, efficient, very Apple.

Representative Image

Here’s where the joke stops being funny though. These redesigned models will probably only come in Pro and Max configurations initially, with the base model stuck on the old design for another year. That’s Apple’s way of charging a premium while keeping cheaper options available. The iPad Pro jumped about $200 when it got tandem OLED. Expect similar economics here, putting the entry point for a redesigned 14-inch model somewhere around $2,200 or higher. You’ll be able to buy this laptop and play GTA 6 on it via cloud gaming before you can buy GTA 6 natively. What a time to be alive.

The post We Might Get A Touchscreen M6 MacBook Pro Before GTA 6 first appeared on Yanko Design.

Nomad Icy Blue Glow Stratos Band adds glow-in-the-dark twist to Apple Watch Ultra

Posted on by

Getting a watch band for your Watch Ultra just got interesting with Nomad’s latest addition to the Stratos Band line-up. After the success with the custom fit band designed for the Ultra in titanium finish and the FKM links, which is more comfortable to wear and touch, this watch band is irresistible. Coming in a fluoroelastomer cast that glows in Tron-like hues, the band demonstrates how “performance and fun can happen at the same time.” Nomad calls it the Icy Blue Glow version, and it’s a limited-run creation that pairs rugged durability with understated style.

The new Stratos Band blends Grade 4 titanium hardware with compression-molded FKM fluoroelastomer for a hybrid design that balances strength and flexibility. The titanium outer links provide a refined look and robust build, while the FKM interior links contour around the wrist for comfort and movement that traditional metal bands rarely offer. This dual-material approach also introduces subtle ventilation spaces, which help with moisture evaporation and breathability during everyday wear or more intense activity.

Designer: Nomad

What sets the Icy Blue Glow edition apart is the photoluminescent material infused into the interior FKM links. This compound absorbs light throughout the day and emits a soft blue glow in low-light conditions. The glowing effect is more subdued in typical environments because the material sits beneath the titanium, but it still produces a cool, visual accent in the dark that distinguishes it from more conventional bands. Nomad equips this limited version with a custom magnetic clasp engineered for secure closure and corrosion resistance. The clasp remains fastened through daily movements yet opens easily when the sides of the buckle are squeezed. Users can also fine-tune the band’s fit using the included tool to remove or add links, making customization straightforward.

Though designed from the ground up for Apple Watch Ultra models 1 and higher, the Stratos Band is also compatible with earlier Apple Watch Series 1–11 and SE models, offering versatility across a wide range of devices. The band’s flexible design supports wrist sizes generally between 130 mm and 200 mm, and its construction balances a weight that feels substantial without being cumbersome. The titanium elements are finished with a scratch-resistant DLC coating, adding resilience for adventures and daily use alike.

The fluoroelastomer material itself is antimicrobial and can be cleaned easily with soap and water, supporting hygiene for wear during workouts or outdoor activities. The band’s water-resistant design further reinforces its adaptability to various lifestyles, though it’s recommended to allow the band to dry fully after exposure to moisture. Priced at $189, the Stratos Band Icy Blue Glow edition offers a premium alternative to standard Apple and third-party bands with a playful glow-in-the-dark element.

The post Nomad Icy Blue Glow Stratos Band adds glow-in-the-dark twist to Apple Watch Ultra first appeared on Yanko Design.

iPhone Fold Specs Leak Online: Aluminum + Titanium Body, A20 Chipset, and the Rebirth of TouchID

Posted on by

Apple’s foldable smartphone with dual displays for multitasking

If someone told you in 2019 that we’d see seven generations of Samsung Galaxy Folds before Apple released a single foldable iPhone, you’d probably have believed them because that’s exactly how Apple operates. Wait, watch, then swoop in like they just invented the whole concept. Well, 2026 might finally be the year, assuming these leaks are legit and not just wishful thinking from analysts who’ve been predicting the iPhone Fold since the Obama era.

The rumor mill is churning out some pretty specific claims right now. We’re talking actual dimensions, chip specs, and price points that’ll make your wallet weep. But more interesting than the what is the how and why. Apple’s supposedly been tackling the exact problems that have kept foldables from going mainstream, which either means they’ve cracked the code or they’re about to learn the same expensive lessons Samsung already learned. Let’s unpack what we actually know versus what’s tech journalism fan fiction.

Designer: Apple

The specs coming out of supply chain analyst Jeff Pu’s investor briefings paint a picture of a device Apple’s positioning right alongside the iPhone 18 Pro lineup. September 2026 launch date, which means they’re treating this as a flagship product rather than some experimental side quest. The inner display clocks in at 7.8 inches when you unfold it, putting it in direct competition with Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 8. The outer screen sits at 5.3 inches, which is actually smaller than what Samsung’s offering. That’s either Apple prioritizing pocketability or a sign they couldn’t fit a bigger screen without compromising the design. Probably both, knowing how Apple thinks about these things.

The whole device reportedly measures 4.5mm when unfolded, which is genuinely insane when you consider what’s packed inside. For context, that’s thinner than most credit cards and absolutely thinner than any iPhone that’s ever existed. The folded thickness supposedly hits around 9mm, which still slides into a pocket easier than carrying an iPad mini everywhere. Apple’s apparently using a combination of aluminum and titanium for the frame construction, same lightweight-but-strong approach they’ve been pushing across the Pro iPhone lineup. The real party trick though is the hinge mechanism, which multiple sources claim uses liquid metal components to handle the stress of constant folding without creating that ugly crease everyone hates about foldables.

The A20 chip powering this beast is built on TSMC’s 2-nanometer process, same silicon going into the iPhone 18 Pro models. Apple’s apparently not treating this as a lesser device that gets last year’s processor, which tells you how seriously they’re taking the category. Battery capacity is rumored between 5,400 and 5,800 mAh, making it the largest battery Apple’s ever put in an iPhone because powering two displays simultaneously turns out to require actual juice. That’s almost double the capacity of a regular iPhone 15 Pro, and it needs to be.

The crease is the hot-topic on everyone’s mouths, with the rumor being Apple’s somehow found a way to obliterate it. Every foldable phone on the market has that visible line running down the middle when you unfold it, and it drives people absolutely insane. Apple’s supposedly using a liquid metal hinge design combined with some display technology wizardry to make the crease “nearly invisible” according to the leaks. I’ll believe it when I see it, but if they actually pulled this off, it would immediately make every other foldable look outdated. Samsung’s been iterating on this problem for seven years and still hasn’t fully solved it.

Touch ID is coming back, which is wild after Apple spent the better part of a decade convincing everyone Face ID was the future. The decision makes sense though when you think about the form factor. Authentication needs to work whether the phone is folded, half-open, or fully unfolded, and Face ID gets wonky when you’re holding a device at weird angles or using it propped up like a tiny laptop. A fingerprint sensor in the power button solves all of that instantly. It’s the same approach they took with recent iPads, and it works.

Pricing is where this whole thing either makes sense or falls apart completely. The leaks point to somewhere between $2,000 and $2,500, with recent intel skewing toward the higher end. That’s Mac Studio money for a phone that folds. That’s almost double what an iPhone 17 Pro Max costs. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 8 will probably land around $1,999, so Apple’s betting people will pay a premium for whatever magic they’ve supposedly worked on the crease and overall build quality. Whether that bet pays off depends on a lot of factors, but I guess seeing Apple’s vision of a folding phone first-hand will really help seal the deal regarding whether this 6-7-year wait has finally paid off.

The post iPhone Fold Specs Leak Online: Aluminum + Titanium Body, A20 Chipset, and the Rebirth of TouchID first appeared on Yanko Design.

LEGO Pays Tribute To The 40+ Year Journey Of Apple Calculator Designs

Posted on by

The iPad got its own native calculator app in 2024, just 40 years after Apple rolled out its first-ever GUI (graphical user interface) calculator for the Macintosh in 1984. The original was designed by Chris Espinosa, and was a favorite of Steve Jobs’ up until it was refreshed with the MacOS X in 2001. However, most of us are familiar with the original black and orange calculator UI that debuted as early as 2007.

The thing is, Apple’s calculator designs are a pretty great way to see the company’s design journey. Things went from strictly functional to visually contemporary to goddamn gorgeous (without ever compromising usability of course), and this LEGO set captures that journey perfectly. Put together with just 821 pieces, this fan-made build shows Apple’s transition through 4 stages – going all the way from the b/w 1984 calculator to the modern scientific calculator.

Designer: The Art Of Knowledge

The first calculator design was put together by Espinosa at the young age of 22 while under the leadership of Jobs. Famously a pedantic, Jobs ripped apart almost every design that Espinosa shared with him. After multiple iterations, Espinosa went to him with what we now look at as the final design. It was accepted, but not without a strong dose of criticism from Jobs, who said “Well, it’s a start but basically, it stinks. The background color is too dark, some lines are the wrong thickness, and the buttons are too big.”

The calculator was finally tweaked on the UI and semantics front by Andy Hertzfeld and Donn Derman, who retained this Jobs-approved graphical version. This remained a standard on Macs all the way up until the end of OS 9. The following OS X, again led by Jobs’ vision to break past old and usher in the new, saw a more skeuomorphic approach.

In 2001, Apple transitioned away from its classic Mac OS 9 calculator, known for its simple, functional design (influenced by Steve Jobs and Dieter Rams’ Braun aesthetic), to the new Mac OS X, featuring a refreshed look that emphasized minimalism, better integration, and user-friendly details like larger zero buttons, reflecting Jobs’ philosophy of simplicity and intuitive interaction.

The final calculator design we see today wasn’t always like this. Apple loyalists will remember a phase in 2007 when the iPhone did have a calculator app with the familiar black and orange colorway, but with rectangular buttons instead of orange ones. The circles only made their way into the UI as late as 2024, although design-nerds will remember the Braun ET55 calculator which heavily inspired Apple’s design efforts. Braun’s entire design philosophy, crafted by legend Dieter Rams himself, helped craft Apple’s approach to industrial (and even interface) design. Shown below are two versions of the same iOS18 calculator design – in basic as well as scientific formats.

“This model utilizes interlocking plates, tiles, and inverted tiles for a smooth, tactile finish. It is designed as a modular desk display, perfect for students, engineers, and tech historians alike. With roughly 821 pieces, it offers a rewarding build experience that fits perfectly alongside other LEGO office or technology sets. Attention is paid to the scale of the model to match as closely as possible to the apps,” says designer The Art Of Knowledge, who put this MOC together for LEGO lovers on the LEGO Ideas forum. It currently exists as just a fan-made concept, although you can vote the build into reality by heading down to the LEGO Ideas website and casting your vote for the design. It’s free!

The post LEGO Pays Tribute To The 40+ Year Journey Of Apple Calculator Designs first appeared on Yanko Design.