Tag Archives: Apple

Spigen Turned Apple’s Iconic Beige Mouse Into an AirPods Pro 3 Case

Posted on by

There’s something quietly odd about the era when Apple products were beige. Not bad, just odd. The Macintosh 128K, the boxy rectangular mouse, the Apple Lisa; they were made from a warm off-white plastic that aged into something stranger, a color that collectors now call “Pantone 453 approximately.” Spigen, a brand that usually channels its energy into clear polycarbonate shells, has decided this particular slice of computing history deserves a second life on your keychain.

The Classic LS AirPods Pro 3 case is the latest piece of Spigen’s retro-Mac collection, which launched in January 2026 with an iPhone 17 case modeled after the Macintosh 128K and Apple Lisa. The AirPods case takes a narrower reference: the original Apple mouse, that flat, single-button input device that became an icon despite being spectacularly simple. It joins a phone strap and a MagFit wallet styled as a floppy disk reader, completing a four-piece set.

Designer: Spigen

The case borrows the mouse’s proportions, its warm stone-colored plastic, and its most tactile feature. Spigen built a “Push to Unlock” locking mechanism into the front, positioned where the mouse button would have been. Press it and the hinged lid releases; snap it shut, and it clicks back into place. It’s a small mechanical gesture, but it makes opening and closing feel deliberate rather than accidental.

That security matters more than it sounds. For anyone who has found a lidless AirPods case rattling loose at the bottom of a bag, the locking mechanism is a genuine practical improvement over standard cases. The AirPods don’t pop out unexpectedly, and the lid doesn’t spring open on its own. An adhesive strip inside connects the lid to the top of the AirPods case, so the whole assembly opens cleanly as one unit.

The shell itself is polycarbonate, reinforced with what Spigen calls Air Cushion Technology, an internal structure designed to absorb impact at the corners and edges. The case wraps the AirPods Pro 3 charging case completely, with a cutout at the bottom for USB-C wired charging and a clear path through the back for wireless charging. Both work without removing the case.

A braided lanyard comes included, threading through a loop on the side. This isn’t just a piece of decoration, as small charging cases have a remarkable talent for disappearing into coat pockets and bags, and a physical tether is a more reliable retrieval system than searching by feel. The Classic LS case retails for $44.99, which places it comfortably in the broader collection alongside the $40 MagFit wallet and well below the $60 iPhone case that started it all.

The post Spigen Turned Apple’s Iconic Beige Mouse Into an AirPods Pro 3 Case first appeared on Yanko Design.

Apple Gave AirPods Max a Brain Transplant After 5 Years (Same Design, New Chipset)

Posted on by

Apple just gave the AirPods Max a brain transplant, and after five years on H1 silicon that was already a generation behind when the AirPods Pro 2 launched in 2022, it was due. The H2 is the real story here, because everything else on this headphone is identical to what shipped in December 2020. Same aluminum frame, same stainless steel headband, same mesh knit ear cushions, same 385-gram weight, same $549 price. ANC is rated at 1.5x more effective than the previous gen, and the full H2 feature set, Adaptive Audio, Conversation Awareness, Voice Isolation, and Live Translation, all land here for the first time. What changed is everything running underneath a design that was already doing its job.

Adaptive Audio is what AirPods Max owners have been watching from the sidelines since AirPods Pro 2 launched in 2022. The mode dynamically blends active noise cancellation and transparency based on your environment, dialing back the ANC when someone speaks nearby and re-engaging it when you’re back on a loud street. It sounds incremental until you’ve used it for a full commute, at which point going without it feels like a step backward. H2 also brings lossless audio at 24-bit, 48 kHz, though only over a wired USB-C connection, so wireless listening stays capped at AAC. That’s a real ceiling to live with at this price, but the original AirPods Max never offered lossless in any configuration, so it’s at least movement.

Designer: Apple

Five years, and Apple didn’t touch the design, which makes sense once you understand what the design is doing. The aluminum ear cups and stainless steel headband aren’t decorative choices, they’re structural, and they’re why this thing still looks and feels like a premium object after years of use, while equivalent plastic-and-fabric builds from Sony and Bose at lower prices tend to show wear sooner. The AirPods Max weighs 385 grams, heavier than anything in the over-ear category at this tier, and it still doesn’t fold flat for travel. Sony’s WH-1000XM6 and Bose’s QuietComfort Ultra are both lighter, foldable, and notably cheaper. Apple’s bet was that material quality carries the argument, and for desk or commute use, it mostly does. The Digital Crown for volume and track control is still here, and it remains one of the better physical inputs on any over-ear headphone.

The Smart Case is still a pouch, not a case in any conventional sense. It’s a silicone sleeve that covers the ear cups and nothing else, leaving the headband fully exposed to whatever else is in your bag. It doesn’t fold the headphones flat, it adds no meaningful drop protection, and it looks like a small clutch that wandered in from a different product category. For $549, the carry solution should be better than this, and the fact that it’s unchanged after five years suggests Apple either rationalized it or decided the complaint volume wasn’t loud enough to act on. It’s the one part of the AirPods Max story that feels genuinely unfinished, and at this price, that friction sticks out more than it should.

Battery life holds at 20 hours, which is fine but trails the Bose QuietComfort Ultra’s 24-hour rating and Sony’s 30-hour claim on the XM6. What AirPods Max 2 actually has now is alignment with the rest of Apple’s audio lineup, a chip-level catch-up that makes this headphone feel current for the first time since launch. The ANC improvement is real, the H2 feature parity with AirPods Pro 3 is real, and lossless audio over USB-C gives the product a use case it never had before. If you own the original and spent three years watching Adaptive Audio and Conversation Awareness roll out to cheaper AirPods, the upgrade argument is now solid. First-time buyers are getting the version of this headphone the original was always pointing toward.

The post Apple Gave AirPods Max a Brain Transplant After 5 Years (Same Design, New Chipset) first appeared on Yanko Design.

Mac Neo Concept Imagines a Cheaper, A18 Pro-powered Apple Desktop Built for the OpenClaw Era

Posted on by

Apple’s MacBook Neo opened the door to a new kind of Mac, one that trades raw power for accessibility, color, and mass appeal. The A18 Pro chip powering it has already proven capable enough for a full laptop experience, which makes the logical next question an obvious one: what happens when that same formula moves to the desktop? The timing couldn’t be sharper. OpenClaw’s rise as a locally-run AI agent has sent Mac Mini demand into a frenzy, with high-memory units backordered for up to six weeks and stock selling out across multiple markets. People clearly want affordable Apple silicon desktops, and supply simply hasn’t caught up.

That gap is exactly where a Mac Neo would land. Sitting below the Mac Mini in price while carrying the same cheerful color identity as the MacBook Neo, it fills a slot in Apple’s lineup that currently doesn’t exist but arguably should. Students, first-time Mac buyers, and anyone running lightweight local AI workloads would have a natural home in the Mac Neo. Apple already has the MacBook Neo pulling switchers in from the laptop side, and a matching desktop completes the picture. It carries the MacBook Neo’s spirit forward into the living room, the dorm room, and the home office, completing a product family that right now feels one piece short.

Designer: Apple
Images Created Using AI

That Mac Mini silhouette in blush pink or citrus yellow feels like the iMac G3’s spiritual successor. The color makes it feel personal rather than utilitarian, which is exactly what Jobs and Ive were aiming for with the iMacs back in the pre-aluminium days. The color-matched aluminum shell mirrors the same four-finish palette as the MacBook Neo, which means Apple could market these as a set to schools and first-time buyers with minimal effort. What’s visually notable is the slim profile, noticeably thinner than the current Mac Mini, which tracks given the A18 Pro runs completely fanless in laptop form. A desktop chassis with even modest passive cooling could push that chip harder and longer than any laptop allows.

The A18 Pro ships with a 6-core CPU, 5-core GPU, and a 16-core Neural Engine on TSMC’s second-generation 3nm process. In the MacBook Neo, it runs completely fanless through photo editing, streaming, and light AI inference. Drop it into a desktop with a real power brick and passive cooling, and the chip gains the thermal headroom to sustain performance a laptop chassis simply cannot hold. Apple’s own benchmarks show the A18 Pro outperforming Intel Core Ultra 5 PCs in the same class, and a desktop form factor with better cooling only reinforces that. Configure it with 16GB of unified memory and you have something that runs local model inference comfortably and covers the full Apple Intelligence feature set.

 

Apple’s current Mac lineup has no desktop entry below $599, leaving the budget switcher market completely unaddressed. A Mac Neo at $399 puts macOS in the same price bracket as Chromebooks, which have dominated education for over a decade largely because Apple never showed up at that price with a desktop. The OpenClaw surge sharpens the argument: Mac Mini shortages stretching six weeks on high-memory units confirm massive pent-up demand for affordable Apple silicon desktops. These buyers want local AI on hardware they own, and the Mac Mini’s $599 floor prices many of them out. A Mac Neo with 16GB unified memory, Apple Intelligence support, and a $399 starting price addresses all of that and does it in a package that actually looks like it belongs on a desk.

 

 

 

The post Mac Neo Concept Imagines a Cheaper, A18 Pro-powered Apple Desktop Built for the OpenClaw Era first appeared on Yanko Design.

The $599 MacBook Neo is Shaking Up the PC Industry: 6 Best Alternatives

Posted on by

Apple has never really done “affordable.” For decades, the cheapest way into the Mac ecosystem meant spending at least $999, and that was considered a deal. So when the company announced the MacBook Neo at $599, or $499 for students and educators, the reaction wasn’t just surprise. It was something closer to disbelief. This is the same Apple that charges $19 for a polishing cloth, and it just put a laptop on the shelf for less than most people’s monthly rent.

It’s not an accident or a moment of generosity. The MacBook Neo is a deliberate move into a market segment Apple has ignored for years: the budget laptop buyer. Students, first-time Mac users, families on tighter budgets. These are the people who’ve been defaulting to Chromebooks and cheap Windows machines, not because they preferred them, but because a Mac was simply out of reach. Apple just changed that math, and the PC industry is already scrambling to respond.

Designer: Apple

More Than a Fresh Coat of Paint

The Neo comes in four colors: blush, indigo, silver, and a sharp citrus yellow. The colors even extend to the Magic Keyboard in lighter shades and matching wallpapers, which is a level of cohesion you genuinely don’t see at this price point in Windows hardware. The aluminum enclosure weighs 2.7 pounds, and the 13-inch Liquid Retina display runs at 2408-by-1506 resolution with 500 nits of brightness, outpacing most competing devices in this segment by a considerable margin. Combine that with up to 16 hours of battery life, and the headline specs read like a mid-range laptop, not an entry-level one.

The chip underneath all of that is the A18 Pro, the same processor that powered the iPhone 16 Pro in 2024. That’s where the picture gets a bit more nuanced. It’s definitely more than enough for web browsing, document editing, streaming, casual photo editing, and AI tasks. What it isn’t is a creative workstation. This machine is fanless, silent, and cool-running, but it isn’t going to replace even a MacBook Air for serious video work or sustained heavy computation. Apple has been honest about that positioning, and the spec sheet backs it up.

There are also a few caveats beyond the silicon. There’s no backlit keyboard on the base $599 model, which feels like an odd omission in 2026. Fast charging isn’t supported either, with only a 20W USB-C adapter in the box. The connectivity is minimal: one USB 3 port (USB-C) and one USB 2 port (USB-C), the latter topping out at 480Mb/s, which is slow enough to matter if you regularly move large files. No Thunderbolt. No MagSafe. Touch ID is exclusive to the $699 model. These are deliberate subtractions, not oversights, designed to protect the MacBook Air’s value proposition while keeping the Neo’s cost down.

Road Once Traveled: Windows RT

Before getting too swept up in the novelty of the MacBook Neo, it’s worth remembering that the idea of an affordable, ARM-based portable computer aimed at everyday users isn’t new. Microsoft tried exactly this in 2012 with Windows RT, a version of Windows designed to run on ARM chips and released alongside the original Surface tablet. The pitch was appealing: a sleek, efficient, battery-friendly device that could handle the basics and connect to the broader Windows world.

The fact that it failed is pretty much part of history by now. The core problem wasn’t the hardware or even the concept: it was the software. Windows RT looked and felt like Windows but couldn’t run traditional Windows desktop applications. It was a watered-down experience wearing a familiar face, and users who expected full Windows compatibility found themselves stranded. The app ecosystem didn’t materialize fast enough, either, and Microsoft eventually abandoned the platform. Windows on ARM has continued in various forms since then, but it’s never fully shaken the baggage of that first failed attempt.

Apple, by contrast, spent years laying groundwork before making its ARM leap. When the company transitioned the entire Mac lineup to Apple Silicon starting in 2020, it didn’t ask developers to build for a new platform overnight. The Rosetta 2 translation layer handled legacy Intel apps smoothly from day one, and Apple had spent over a decade pushing developers toward modern APIs and frameworks through iOS. By the time the A18 Pro landed inside a $599 laptop, the software ecosystem was already there waiting for it. The MacBook Neo doesn’t run a restricted version of macOS. It runs full macOS Tahoe, with access to the same App Store and the same apps as any other Mac, and that is the fundamental difference that Microsoft was never able to bridge with Windows RT.

The best alternatives if the MacBook Neo isn’t for you

The MacBook Neo sets a new standard for what a $600 laptop can look and feel like. That said, it’s not the right machine for everyone. If you’re committed to Windows, need more RAM, prefer a larger display, or simply aren’t ready to switch ecosystems, there are some solid alternatives worth considering in the same price range.

Acer Swift Go 14 (SFG14-73)

The Acer Swift Go 14 is one of the more compelling Windows options at this price point, running on an Intel Core Ultra 5 processor with integrated Intel Arc graphics, 8GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. That’s double the storage of the base Neo for roughly the same $600 price. The bigger draw is the display: a 14-inch OLED panel at 2880×1800 resolution, which is genuinely excellent for a laptop in this category and makes the Swift Go a strong pick for anyone who consumes a lot of media.

Designer: Acer

The trade-offs can’t be ignored, though. Battery life comes in around 8.5 hours, which is significantly shorter than the Neo’s 16-hour rating, and it weighs about 2.87 pounds in a larger chassis. It’s also a somewhat older-gen model, and that sweet price tag is only available in select retailers. If you want a bigger, sharper screen and don’t mind carrying a charger more often, the Swift Go earns a serious look.

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 (15″, AMD)

Lenovo’s IdeaPad Slim 5 punches above its price with a more generous hardware loadout than the Neo: an AMD Ryzen 5 8540 processor, 8GB of RAM, and 512GB of storage, all available around the $500 price point. Lenovo also tends to make the best keyboards in the budget Windows space, and this one continues that tradition.

Designer: Lenovo

Where it falls short is predictable. The display is a 15-inch 1920×1200 IPS panel, which is perfectly functional but a noticeable step down from the Neo’s Liquid Retina screen in terms of sharpness and color. The battery life is what you’d expect from a Windows laptop. It won’t make you smile when you pull it out of a bag the way the Neo will, but if raw specs-per-dollar is the priority, the IdeaPad Slim 3 is a difficult machine to argue against.

HP OmniBook 5 (BA1056NR)

HP’s OmniBook 5 positions itself as an entry-level everyday laptop with pricing that frequently dips below $650, giving it a clear edge over the Neo in pure cost. It runs on modest Intel hardware, comes with a generous serving of 16GB of RAM, and is built primarily for email, web browsing, document editing, and video calls, the exact workload profile Apple says the Neo is designed for. Battery life is rated respectably, and the keyboard and trackpad are comfortable enough for extended daily use.

Designer: HP

The honest version of this recommendation comes with a caveat: the OmniBook 5 doesn’t compete with the Neo on display quality, build materials, or software longevity. The screen is a standard 16-inch 1080p IPS panel in a plastic chassis, and it runs Windows on Intel Core 5 silicon, which is a much older generation than today’s selection. It makes sense as a pure budget play if the price tag is still a stretch, but going in with eyes open about what those savings cost you is important.

Acer Chromebook Plus Spin 714 (CP714-1H-54UB)

The Acer Chromebook Plus Spin 714 is one of the more capable Chromebooks available around the $530 mark with a discount ($699 in full), and it brings a feature the Neo completely lacks: a touchscreen. Running on an Intel Core Ultra 5 with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, it matches the Neo’s base memory and storage configuration while adding 2-in-1 convertibility and a 14-inch IPS display at 1920×1200. For students, especially, the tent and tablet modes open up use cases that a standard clamshell laptop can’t cover.

Designer: Acer

The limitations are ChromeOS itself, which has narrowed the gap with full desktop operating systems considerably but still trails macOS and Windows for professional app compatibility. Battery life is advertised to be around 10 hours, shorter than the Neo but solid for a school day. At 3.21 lbs, it’s heavier and physically larger, and the display is a step behind the Neo in resolution and color quality. For someone already in the Google ecosystem, though, this is the sharpest Chromebook rival to the Neo in this price window.

Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 (ChromeOS)

Lenovo’s Chromebook Plus 14 is the premium option in the ChromeOS space, and its headline feature is the display: a 14-inch 1920×1200 OLED panel with touchscreen support at a price of $749. For a Chromebook, that’s genuinely unusual hardware, and the screen quality puts it ahead of most of the Windows competition in this tier. It also supports Wi-Fi 7, runs on an Arm-based MediaTek Kompanio Ultra 910 chip with 16GB of RAM, and offers a build quality noticeably above the typical Chromebook standard.

Designer: Lenovo

The case for it over the Neo comes down to ecosystem preference. If Google Docs, YouTube, and Android apps cover your workflow, the Chromebook Plus 14 delivers a premium screen and a refined experience for less money than a MacBook Air. If you need desktop-class software, the ceiling becomes apparent quickly. ChromeOS has matured, but it still hits walls that macOS doesn’t. This is the Chromebook that makes you reconsider the category, not the one that makes you forget its limitations entirely.

Refurbished MacBook Air M1

It feels slightly odd to list an older Mac as an alternative to a newer Mac, but the refurbished MacBook Air M1 is worth the mention. Available through Apple’s certified refurbished store, third-party retailers, and resellers, the M1 Air frequently surfaces in the $600 to $700 range and represents a considerable step up from the Neo in several areas. The M1 chip is more capable than the A18 Pro for sustained workloads, it has MagSafe-era USB-C with Thunderbolt support, and it comes with 8 to 16GB of unified memory in the base configuration with a more mature, battle-tested macOS optimization story.

The catch is that you’re buying hardware from 2020, and Apple’s software support timeline means the M1 will eventually age out of macOS updates before a Neo purchased today will. For someone who wants macOS and a bit more headroom without stepping up to the $1,099 MacBook Air M5, the refurbished M1 is a pragmatic option rather than an inspired one. It gets the job done, but it doesn’t have the new colors, and the MacBook Neo, despite its compromises, is the more forward-looking machine.

Wake-up call

Affordable Windows laptops and Chromebooks have never been in short supply. The problem has always been that most of them require accepting significant compromises: dim displays, plastic chassis that creak, battery life that barely lasts a workday, or chips so underpowered that the experience degrades within a year of purchase. Many of the more appealing options in this segment come from lesser-known manufacturers, which brings its own concerns around software support and build reliability over time.

What the MacBook Neo does is reframe the question the PC industry has been comfortable not asking. ARM-based Windows laptops have existed for years, and the Snapdragon X series has made genuine progress, but Windows on ARM still hasn’t found the cultural moment that would turn it into a mainstream category. The Neo’s arrival and the reaction to it suggest that the market for a well-made, genuinely affordable computer aimed at students and everyday users is larger than the industry has been willing to address seriously. Apple just walked in and asked whether cheap and simple was enough, or whether those buyers might actually want something better.

The post The $599 MacBook Neo is Shaking Up the PC Industry: 6 Best Alternatives first appeared on Yanko Design.

Apple Finally Rounded the MacBook’s Corners After 18 Years

Posted on by

For about 18 years, every aluminum MacBook has looked more or less the same. Silver. Angular. Quietly serious. There’s nothing wrong with that. Apple’s unibody aluminum design, introduced in October 2008 and carved from a single block of metal, was genuinely elegant and set the template for an entire industry. But it also retired something along the way: the idea that a Mac laptop could feel chosen rather than just defaulted to.

The MacBook Neo, announced March 4 and starting at just $599, is the first real crack in that template. It comes in four colors (blush, indigo, silver, and a yellow-green called citrus) with enclosure corners that are noticeably softer than any aluminum Mac in recent memory. Whether that adds up to a proper design statement or just smart positioning is worth thinking through.

Designer: Apple

What happened to Apple’s color confidence

iBook G3 Clamshell (courtesy of Wikipedia)

Apple’s fondness for color didn’t always live inside an iPhone. The iBook G3, launched in 1999, came in tangerine and blueberry, and later in indigo and key lime. It was rounded, slightly toy-like, and completely unapologetic about being a consumer product. When the aluminum unibody arrived in 2008, Apple traded that warmth for precision machining and sharp rectilinear edges. Right call for the MacBook Pro. Default for everything else, apparently, for nearly two decades.

The result was a color drought in aluminum Mac laptops that has lasted until now. Silver, space gray, midnight, starlight: all variations on the same mood of professional restraint. The Neo’s citrus and blush aren’t just options on a spec page. They’re a quiet admission that not every laptop buyer wants a device that looks like it belongs in a boardroom. For Apple, that’s actually not a small thing to say at the product level.

Two different stories about corners

M1 MacBook Pro (2021)

There’s a distinction worth making here, because “rounded corners” gets used loosely when describing the Neo. MacBook displays have had rounded screen corners since 2021, which is a display-level detail and nothing new. What’s different on the Neo is the chassis itself. The physical aluminum enclosure is softer at the edges and corners than any aluminum Mac before it, and Apple’s own press materials describe “soft, rounded corners” specifically in terms of how the device feels to hold and carry.

That’s a real shift in the design language. The 2008 unibody was celebrated for machined sharpness, corners you could feel were engineered. The Neo softens that deliberately. It’s not a revival of the iBook, and it’s not trying to be, but the instinct is similar: a consumer Mac that feels a little more like it belongs to you. The notch is also gone, making this the first notchless MacBook since 2020, which quietly tidies up the one thing that made recent Airs feel slightly unfinished.

The repairability angle is actually a design story too

One thing that got a little buried under the color conversation: the Neo is the most repairable Mac laptop in years, and that’s partly a design decision worth noting. Teardowns showed how the whole machine was disassembled in just a few minutes using standard Torx screws throughout. No tape, no adhesive, anywhere inside. That’s a first for a modern Mac. The USB-C ports, speakers, and headphone jack are all modular. The keyboard can be replaced on its own, without swapping the entire top case, which on the MacBook Air currently costs over $370 in parts.

The internal simplicity isn’t accidental. The A18 Pro chip runs so efficiently that the Neo needs no fan at all, which removes a whole layer of thermal engineering that usually clutters a laptop’s interior. The result is a cleaner, more logical internal layout. Whether Apple arrived here from genuine design philosophy or from regulatory pressure (the EU’s right-to-repair push has been building for years) is an open question, but the outcome is real either way.

What it doesn’t fix, and what might come next

It’s not all sunshine and rainbows, of course. The base model has 8GB of non-upgradable RAM, one USB-C port runs at USB 2.0 speeds, and there’s no backlit keyboard. These are calculated trade-offs for the price point, not mistakes, but they matter depending on what you actually need the machine for. And repairability, for all the justified enthusiasm, is still partial: the RAM and storage are fixed at purchase, just like every other current Mac.

Still, the Neo feels like Apple designing for a specific person it had previously ignored: someone who was never going to spend $1,000 on a MacBook Air and wasn’t particularly well served by anything else Apple made. The color, the softer form, the price, the clean internals, all of it points at the same person. What’s genuinely interesting is whether any of this travels upmarket. If a future MacBook Air gets a color story this confident, the Neo might end up looking less like an entry-level product and more like Apple quietly figuring out what comes next.

The post Apple Finally Rounded the MacBook’s Corners After 18 Years first appeared on Yanko Design.

iPhone 20 in 2027: All-Glass, Buttonless, and Highly Unlikely

Posted on by

The iPhone turns 20 in 2027, and Apple apparently wants to throw a party that people will remember. Sources believe that the company is targeting a radical redesign for what will likely be called the iPhone 20, skipping “iPhone 19” the same way it jumped directly to the iPhone X back in 2017. More than just a naming trick, it came with the full-screen OLED design, Face ID, and the removal of the home button, a move that felt genuinely shocking at the time. The expectation building around the iPhone 20 is that history is supposed to repeat itself, only bigger.

The appetite is clearly there. Interest in bold Apple hardware has been riding high on the back of iPhone Fold rumors, and the search interest in “iPhone 20 design” has shot up by over 3,100% year-over-year. People are hungry for a leap, not an incremental shuffle. What Apple is reportedly planning, an all-glass unibody with no physical buttons and no visible cutouts anywhere on the device, is exactly the kind of leap that generates excitement. Whether it generates anything more than that is a genuinely open question.

Images courtesy of: AppleTrack

iPhone X (2017)

What it isn’t: an all-screen phone

Before the imagination runs completely wild, it helps to be specific about what “all-glass” is not. This is not a Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha situation, where the display wraps entirely around the phone like a very expensive, very fragile bracelet. That concept, for all its visual drama, would introduce a cascade of problems: iOS and most apps are built on the assumption that the back of a phone is inert. Making the entire surface interactive requires a fundamental rethinking of how software handles accidental input, palm rejection, and basic navigation, none of which Apple appears to be pursuing here.

Designer: Xiaomi

The more useful comparison is the Vivo APEX from 2019, a concept phone that was genuinely all-glass and buttonless without wrapping the display around the chassis. The APEX had no physical buttons, no headphone jack, no visible ports, and shockingly, no front camera. It was definitely a striking object. It also never made it to retail, because striking objects and reliable everyday devices are not always the same thing.

Designer: vivo

What the rumors are actually saying

The picture assembled from various sources is fairly consistent in its broad strokes. The iPhone 20 is expected to arrive with a four-sided bending OLED display that curves around all edges, a fully glass chassis with no metal frame visible from the outside, camera lenses flush against the glass back with no raised rings or seams, and an under-display front camera with Face ID sensors also moved beneath the glass. Physical buttons disappear entirely, replaced by what Apple has internally codenamed “Project Bongo,” localized haptic zones that simulate a press through piezoelectric ceramics rather than a mechanical click.

Images courtesy of: AppleTrack

Apple has been laying this groundwork for years, whether deliberately or not. MagSafe removed the last port most people used regularly. The solid-state home button on the iPhone 7 trained a generation of users to accept a simulated click as the real thing. Touch ID lived in that fake button for years before Face ID made it irrelevant. Project Bongo itself has been in development since 2021, with the haptic button solution reportedly completing functional verification for the iPhone 20 last October. The staged rollout has already begun: under-display Face ID is expected to debut on the iPhone 18 Pro in 2026, a year before the full transformation arrives.

Why Apple might actually want this

The engineering case for an all-glass, buttonless phone is stronger than it might first appear, and it goes well beyond aesthetics. Glass transmits radio frequencies with far less attenuation than metal, which means that a fully glass chassis removes the need for antenna break lines, those small plastic interruptions visible on metal-framed iPhones. For 5G mmWave frequencies, which are particularly vulnerable to obstruction, that is a meaningful structural advantage, not a cosmetic one.

Physical buttons are also apertures, meaning every button cutout is a potential entry point for water, dust, and debris, not to mention a structural point of weakness. Solid-state haptic zones flush with a continuous glass surface create a fully sealed perimeter by default. And without springs, electrical contacts, or moving parts, the mechanical failure modes that eventually wear out every physical button simply do not apply. There is also a software dimension: a haptic surface can be reprogrammed. The same zone that acts as a volume button in one context can behave differently in a camera app, or respond to a half-press the way a DSLR shutter does. That interaction vocabulary does not exist on a physical button.

Images courtesy of: AppleTrack

The design coherence argument is worth taking seriously, too. iOS 26 introduced the Liquid Glass UI at WWDC 2025, with translucent menus, frosted panes, and depth-layered interfaces that read as software built to live inside a glass object. If the hardware catches up, the iPhone 20 would be the first Apple device where the material logic of the shell and the interface are genuinely continuous, rather than one imitating the other.

Why Apple will definitely not do it, at least not yet

The skepticism case is longer and, in several places, harder to argue around. Start with the glass itself. No glass smartphone has survived all kinds of real-world accidents unscathed, including the iPhone 16 Pro Max with Ceramic Shield 2. The current metal frame does real structural work; it absorbs and distributes impact energy in ways that glass cannot. A four-sided curved display that wraps around what used to be the frame zone eliminates that crumple zone entirely.

Thermal management is a less visible but equally serious issue. Aluminum conducts heat significantly better than glass. The metal frame in current iPhones is part of the thermal pathway, moving heat from the logic board outward. Glass is a poor conductor and a poor radiator, and with Apple Intelligence pushing sustained on-device AI inference, the thermal load is growing, not shrinking. Apple would need expanded vapor chambers or novel heat-bridge materials to compensate, none of which have been confirmed.

Then there is the under-display camera. Samsung introduced UDC technology with the Galaxy Z Fold3 in 2021 and used it through the Fold6. Image quality was consistently criticized across all four generations, and Samsung is now reportedly abandoning it for future foldables due to persistent optical and cost challenges. Apple is reportedly moving in the opposite direction, but with a twist. It might use the under-display camera primarily for Face ID’s infrared sensors rather than the selfie camera, which sidesteps the worst degradation but does not resolve long-term selfie quality under glass.

Designer: Samsung

Accessibility is a concern that gets less coverage than drop tests, but it definitely deserves more. Blind and visually impaired users rely on physically locatable controls as navigational anchors, such as the raised profile of a button. Flush haptic zones remove that landmark. There is also the “dead device” recovery problem: a bricked iPhone requires holding a specific physical button combination to enter recovery mode. Whether solid-state haptic buttons can operate at the firmware level, before iOS loads, has not been confirmed. Case and accessory compatibility adds another layer; a wraparound display that curves into what is currently the frame zone fundamentally changes how a protective case grips the device, since the element that used to grip the frame now grips the screen.

The human factor is harder to engineer than the glass

The technology story surrounding the iPhone 20 is genuinely fascinating, and some of it will almost certainly happen. Under-display Face ID on the iPhone 18 Pro is close enough to be treated as confirmed. The full vision, no buttons, no cutouts, glass everywhere, is a different question. Manufacturing challenge is described as “extraordinarily complex,” component manufacturers are on the fence, and the expected price point will likely exceed the current Pro Max tier. Those are not the conditions under which Apple tends to ship a complete reimagining all at once.

But the technical hurdles might not be the hardest part. People have strong, specific feelings about physical buttons in ways they do not always articulate until the buttons are gone. The haptic home button on the iPhone 7 worked well enough that most users stopped noticing it within weeks. Extending that same illusion across every tactile control point on the device, in cold weather, through a case, while the phone is vibrating with an incoming call, and across several years of daily use, is a different challenge than a single button in a fixed location. Whether that feels like liberation or a slow-building frustration might depend less on the engineering and more on the person holding it.

Images courtesy of: AppleTrack

The post iPhone 20 in 2027: All-Glass, Buttonless, and Highly Unlikely first appeared on Yanko Design.

The 5 Best Accessories That Look Like They Shipped in an Apple Box (They Didn’t)

Posted on by

Apple has always had this gravitational pull when it comes to design — clean lines, considered materials, and that unmistakable restraint that somehow still feels exciting. It’s the reason a whole ecosystem of third-party accessories exists that speaks the same visual language, sometimes so fluently you’d swear they came out of Cupertino.

The five products on this list sit right in that sweet spot. They’re designed for your Apple devices, they match that premium sensibility, and yet they each bring something Apple itself hasn’t thought of (or wouldn’t dare try). From a keyboard that brings BlackBerry nostalgia to your iPhone to a carabiner that turns your AirTag into a proper adventure companion, these are the accessories that deserve a spot in your setup.

1. Akko MetaKey

There’s something almost rebellious about strapping a physical keyboard to an iPhone in 2026. Akko, a company celebrated in the mechanical keyboard community for its switches and keycap artistry, decided to do exactly that with the MetaKey. It connects to the iPhone 16 Pro Max and 17 Pro Max via USB-C and features a passthrough port, so you can still charge or transfer data without detaching the whole thing. It’s clever, it’s niche, and it’s built with the kind of intentionality that makes you pause and appreciate the craft.

The keyboard layout is compact and BlackBerry-inspired, with backlit keys that work comfortably in low light. What really sets it apart, though, is the thoughtfulness in the details — dedicated shortcuts for Siri, voice dictation, and number input, plus a scroll mode that transforms the top rows into navigation buttons for breezing through long feeds. Akko even includes a tiny nine-gram counterweight that clips behind the keyboard to keep your phone balanced in your hand. It’s the kind of consideration that separates a gimmick from a genuine tool for your Apple device.

What We Like

  • The USB-C passthrough is a smart move — you never have to choose between typing and charging your iPhone, which makes the MetaKey feel like a seamless extension of the phone rather than an inconvenient add-on.
  • The scroll mode is a surprisingly intuitive touch. Turning keyboard rows into navigation buttons for scrolling through social feeds or documents on your iPhone shows that Akko was thinking beyond just text input.

What We Dislike

  • The added length and weight, even with the counterweight, will take some getting used to. It shifts the balance of the phone noticeably, and one-handed use becomes a bit of a juggling act.
  • Compatibility is limited to just two iPhone models. If you’re on an older device or a non-Pro model, you’re out of luck — and that narrows the audience considerably for something this well-designed.

2. AirTag Carabiner

If you’ve ever attached an AirTag to something and felt like the holder was letting down the tracker, this one’s for you. The AirTag Carabiner is made from Duralumin composite alloy — the same material found in aircraft and marine vessels — so it’s as tough as it is minimal. It snaps onto bags, bikes, umbrellas, or whatever else you tend to misplace, and it lets Apple’s Find My network do the rest. There’s a quiet confidence in how understated this thing looks, like it was always supposed to be part of the AirTag’s story.

Each carabiner is individually handcrafted, which gives it a tactile quality that mass-produced holders simply can’t match. It’s also available in untreated brass and stainless steel finishes, so you can match it to your personal style or let it develop a patina over time. For anyone deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem who uses AirTags on everything from luggage to keys, this is one of those small upgrades that quietly elevates the entire experience.

Click Here to Buy Now: $129.00

What We Like

  • The Duralumin construction means it’s lightweight yet remarkably strong — suitable for use in water and at high altitudes, which makes it a genuine companion for outdoor adventures, not just a desk accessory for your AirTag.
  • The handcrafted quality and multiple finish options (brass, stainless steel) add a personal, artisanal dimension that feels right at home next to Apple’s own hardware.

What We Dislike

  • The AirTag itself isn’t included, which is expected but still worth noting — you’re investing in the holder alone, and the overall cost of the tracker plus carabiner adds up.
  • For something this minimal, the design language is almost too subtle. If you like your accessories to make a visual statement, this one deliberately doesn’t — it disappears, which is the point, but not everyone wants that.

3. Nomad Icy Blue Glow Stratos Band

The Apple Watch Ultra was built for people who push limits, and Nomad’s Stratos Band has always matched that energy. But the Icy Blue Glow edition adds something unexpected — a fluoroelastomer cast that lights up in Tron-like hues after dark. It’s a limited-run release, and it bridges the gap between serious performance gear and something you’d actually want to show off at a dinner table. Nomad describes it as proof that performance and fun can coexist, and honestly, it’s hard to argue.

Underneath the glow, the engineering is just as considered. Grade 4 titanium hardware handles the structural work, while compression-molded FKM fluoroelastomer links sit against the skin for comfort and flexibility. The dual-material design creates natural ventilation spaces between the links, helping with moisture and breathability during workouts or just everyday wear. For Apple Watch Ultra owners who’ve cycled through the usual band options and want something that feels both premium and a little playful, this Stratos edition is a standout.

What We Like

  • The hybrid construction of titanium and FKM fluoroelastomer strikes a rare balance — you get the refined, metallic look that matches the Apple Watch Ultra’s hardware with the comfort of a sport band, all in one piece.
  • The glow-in-the-dark feature isn’t just a novelty. It adds genuine visibility during nighttime runs or low-light conditions, making it functional for the adventure crowd the Ultra was designed for.

What We Dislike

  • It’s a limited-run release, which means if you don’t move quickly, it’s gone. For a band this well-made, it would be nice to see it as a permanent option in Nomad’s lineup for Apple Watch Ultra.
  • The glow effect relies on light absorption, so its intensity fades over time in darkness. After a few hours, you’re back to a regular (still great-looking) band — manage expectations accordingly.

4. Battery-Free Amplifying iSpeakers

There’s an elegance to things that work without electricity. The Battery-Free Amplifying iSpeakers from Yanko Design Select take your smartphone’s built-in speaker and amplify the sound purely through acoustic design — no charging, no Bluetooth pairing, no cables. You simply place your iPhone into the cradle and let the Duralumin metal body do the work, channeling and projecting sound waves across the room. It’s the kind of product that makes you appreciate physics as a design material.

Beyond the clever engineering, the speaker itself is designed using the golden ratio, so its proportions feel inherently pleasing on a desk or shelf. The vibration-resistant Duralumin construction — the same aerospace-grade material — means the body stays stable even when the sound is full. There are also optional add-on modules called +Bloom and +Jet that let you direct the sound in different patterns, which is a nice touch for people who care about how audio fills a space. For your iPhone, it’s a zero-fuss, zero-power way to fill a room with music.

Click Here to Buy Now: $179.00

What We Like

  • The completely passive, battery-free design is refreshing in a world of chargers and cables. You just drop your iPhone in and go — no setup, no pairing, no power source needed.
  • The golden ratio proportions and aerospace-grade Duralumin make it as much a desk sculpture as an audio accessory. It genuinely enhances the look of whatever space it sits in alongside your Apple devices.

What We Dislike

  • Acoustic amplification has its limits. Don’t expect it to compete with a powered Bluetooth speaker — it’s best suited for casual listening and background music with your iPhone, not filling a large room for a gathering.
  • The +Bloom and +Jet sound-directing modules are sold separately, which means getting the full experience requires additional investment beyond the base speaker.

5. Triple Boost 14 Pro

Dual monitors are fine. The Triple Boost 14 Pro thinks bigger. This accessory attaches to your MacBook and unfolds into three additional 14-inch IPS displays — two flanking the sides and one rising from the top — turning your laptop into a four-screen workstation that looks like it belongs in a mission control room. It connects via a single cable, and once you set it up, your MacBook’s workspace expands in a way that fundamentally changes how you multitask.

Each panel delivers 1920×1080 resolution at 60Hz with 300 nits of brightness and a matte finish that tames reflections. These aren’t color-accurate screens for photo editing or design work — they’re built for volume, for keeping your spreadsheets, code editors, Slack channels, browser tabs, and terminal windows all visible simultaneously on your MacBook. It’s a tool for people who work across multiple apps at once and hate the alt-tab dance. For MacBook users who’ve always wished their laptop could do more without being tethered to a desk setup, the Triple Boost 14 Pro is a compelling, portable answer.

What We Like

  • The sheer screen real estate is transformative for MacBook productivity. Going from one display to four means you can keep everything visible — no more cycling between windows or losing your place in a workflow.
  • The matte finish on all three panels is a smart, practical choice. It keeps reflections and glare under control, which matters when you’re staring at this much screen area on your MacBook for extended work sessions.

What We Dislike

  • At 1080p and 60Hz, the panels don’t match the Retina quality of your MacBook’s built-in display. The resolution difference is noticeable when you glance between screens, especially with text rendering.
  • Portability is relative here. While it technically travels with your MacBook, the bulk and setup process of three additional screens make this more of a semi-permanent desk solution than a true grab-and-go accessory.

Designed Different, But Designed Right

What ties all five of these accessories together isn’t just compatibility with Apple devices — it’s a shared design philosophy. They’re restrained where they need to be, bold where it counts, and built with materials and details that punch well above what you’d expect from third-party products. Each one feels like it belongs in the Apple ecosystem without trying too hard to imitate it, and that’s a difficult line to walk. These are products made by people who clearly care about craft.

If you’re particular about what sits next to your iPhone, MacBook, or Apple Watch, this list is for you. Not every accessory deserves a place in a carefully considered setup, but these five earn it. They solve real problems, they look good doing it, and they bring ideas that Apple hasn’t explored yet. Sometimes the best additions to your ecosystem are the ones that didn’t come from Cupertino at all.

The post The 5 Best Accessories That Look Like They Shipped in an Apple Box (They Didn’t) first appeared on Yanko Design.

I Ran Android On A MacBook And Even Airdropped Files To iPhone at MWC 2026… And You Can Too

Posted on by

Mirroring a MacBook screen onto an Android phone is not something you expect to work, let alone work fluidly with smooth animations. At HONOR’s MWC 2026 booth, it did exactly that, and then went further by letting you mirror the Magic V6’s display back onto the MacBook, turning the interaction into a genuine two-way street. Tap your HONOR device near an iPhone and files transfer between them, photos, videos, documents, the whole lot, with the kind of animated polish you associate with Apple’s own AirDrop. The same trick works with iPads. HONOR calls the system HONOR Share, and the cross-platform angle is just one layer of a much deeper ecosystem play the company quietly walked in and demonstrated on final, shipping hardware at one of the world’s biggest tech shows.

This cross-platform handshake is part of a broader upgrade to HONOR Share, and it extends well beyond just sending a photo to your friend’s iPhone. The company is positioning its new flagship trio, the Magic V6, MagicPad 4, and MagicBook Pro 14, as an open bridge rather than another walled garden. For the Magic V6, a feature called OneTap transfer allows it to push files directly to a Mac with a single touch, a claim that seems to hold up based on the MWC demos. It’s a direct, pointed solution to a daily friction point for anyone living with a foot in both ecosystems. While Google is still in the process of rolling out its own Quick Share-AirDrop interoperability to the wider Android world in 2026, HONOR just went ahead and shipped a finished product.

Designer: HONOR

The MagicRing integration goes several layers deeper than the Apple-facing features (FYI, it’s a software feature, not an actual ring). Within the HONOR ecosystem, the Magic V6, MagicPad 4, and MagicBook Pro 14 all communicate through HONOR Connect, and any screen can project onto any device bidirectionally, something Apple’s Sidecar only partially replicates within its own hardware range. The mechanics are drag-based: open HONOR Connect, find your target device, drag the screen sharing icon over to it, and projection starts. Bidirectional means both directions work, the MacBook’s display mirroring onto the foldable, the foldable mirroring onto the laptop, same process either way. Dropping files and folders between devices with continuity-style drag behavior runs natively on the MagicPad 4, without a companion app or cloud relay.

At 4.8mm thick with a 12.3-inch 3K OLED running at 165Hz, the MagicPad 4 is a serious piece of hardware to run a MacBook’s extended display onto. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 inside means you’re not compromising on the secondary screen, which matters when you’re doing real creative or coding work. Used as a real-time extended display for a MacBook, it eliminates the need for additional hardware, and for mixed-ecosystem users that’s already a compelling argument on its own. Cross-device drag-and-drop turns it into a productivity node rather than a conventional Android tablet, a designation very few Android tablets have earned. Xiaomi’s iOS Bridge in HyperOS 3.1 gestures at something similar but still relies on companion apps and hasn’t been demonstrated on final shipping hardware.

Apple’s Continuity framework has set the benchmark for multi-device workflows since 2014, and the gap between what Apple offers and what Android could offer was real enough to function as a legitimate reason to stay in Apple’s ecosystem. That gap is narrowing. The Magic V6’s foldable form factor already does things no iPhone can, and layering genuine Apple interoperability on top removes the last practical friction for anyone straddling both worlds. The MWC demo landed on execution: working software on final hardware, smooth animations, no companion apps required. For a certain kind of user, the question of whether to stay full-Apple or go mixed just got significantly harder.

HONOR’s AI Connect Platform, projected to integrate over 20,000 AI services by end of 2026, is the infrastructure underneath all of this, and the MWC demos are its first serious public proof of concept. The company has been repositioning from a budget device manufacturer into what it now calls a global AI device ecosystem company, and this is the first time that framing has been backed by something you could touch and test on a show floor. The Magic V6, running the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, is the first foldable to carry that chip and the anchor device pulling the whole network together. Google’s Quick Share-AirDrop interoperability is confirmed for broader rollout this year, but it carries sharing mode caveats that HONOR has already cleared. The demo in Barcelona was an answer, not a preview.

The post I Ran Android On A MacBook And Even Airdropped Files To iPhone at MWC 2026… And You Can Too first appeared on Yanko Design.

Did Apple’s $599 MacBook Neo just paint a target on the Google Chromebook’s back?

Posted on by

The cheapest MacBook now costs exactly the same as the cheapest iPhone. That’s not a punchline; it’s a price list. For $599, you can get a phone, or you can get a laptop that runs on a phone’s chip, specifically the A18 Pro that powered the iPhone 16 Pro a couple of years back. Apple looked at its vast bin of perfectly good, massively over-engineered mobile silicon and made the most logical leap imaginable. They put it in a beautifully milled aluminum chassis with a keyboard and a 13-inch Liquid Retina display, creating a machine that is, for all intents and purposes, a grown-up iPhone that doesn’t make calls. It’s a wildly clever, almost cynical, piece of product engineering that redefines the entry point to the entire Mac ecosystem.

This move wasn’t about inventing new technology, but about finding the perfect home for existing tech that had become inexpensive through sheer scale. The A18 Pro, with its 6-core CPU and 5-core GPU, is more than capable of handling the daily workload of the average student or web-browser warrior. Paired with a baseline of 8GB of unified memory and a 256GB SSD, the MacBook Neo is engineered to be just enough computer for a massive audience that was previously priced out. Apple’s genius here is recognizing that the performance floor of their mobile chips has risen so high that it now meets the “good enough” ceiling for a huge segment of the laptop market. This is an exercise in masterful cost management, not a race for benchmark glory.

Designer: Apple

That brings us to the real target of this colorful little machine: the classroom. The MacBook Neo isn’t for the video editor or the traveling professional; it’s a precision-guided missile aimed directly at the heart of Google’s Chromebook empire. With an education price of just $499, Apple has officially entered a knife fight with a very sharp, very shiny knife. For years, schools have defaulted to fleets of cheap, functional, and ultimately disposable Chromebooks. Apple is betting that for a small premium, school districts will jump at the chance to give students a device that feels premium, integrates with their iPhones, and carries the weight of the Apple brand. It’s a compelling argument that repositions the Mac from an aspirational product to a practical, attainable one.

It’s not that Google completely fumbled its lead, but it certainly grew complacent. The Chromebook ecosystem won on price and dead-simple IT management, not on user experience. Google’s Auto Update Expiration policy, which effectively gives every device a software death sentence, has been a constant source of friction for budget-strapped schools that need hardware to last. This created an opening for a company known for its long-term software support. Apple can now walk into a school administrator’s office and offer a more durable, better-feeling machine with a clear software roadmap, making the slightly higher initial cost seem like a smarter long-term investment. Google sold schools a cheap solution, and Apple is countering with a cost-effective one.

Of course, a $599 Mac comes with an asterisk, and the MacBook Neo has a few big ones. The most glaring omission is the lack of a backlit keyboard, a feature that has been standard on laptops for over a decade and feels almost punitive to remove. There’s also no support for fast charging, so topping up the battery will be a leisurely affair. These aren’t accidents; they are carefully calculated sacrifices made to protect the profit margin and create clear feature differentiation from the more expensive MacBook Air. Apple is using the vibrant new color options, like Citrus and Indigo, to distract from the spec sheet compromises, but to be honest, nothing is more of a distraction than that price point.

The post Did Apple’s $599 MacBook Neo just paint a target on the Google Chromebook’s back? first appeared on Yanko Design.

iPhone 17e Gets MagSafe but No Dynamic Island or Gemini Apple Intelligence… Is It Worth Buying?

Posted on by

Apple has a habit of making its budget phones more interesting than they have any right to be. The iPhone 17e packs the same A19 chip found in the standard iPhone 17 into a $599 body, with a 6-core CPU built on 3-nanometer architecture, a 4-core GPU with Neural Accelerators, and a 16-core Neural Engine optimized for large generative models. Live Translation, Call Screening, Visual Intelligence, and Hold Assist all run natively on a phone that costs $200 less than the base iPhone 17. That’s the real headline, even if Apple hasn’t framed it quite that directly.

The A19 here is a binned variant with a 4-core GPU versus the 5-core in the standard iPhone 17, but graphics performance is still around 30% faster than the A18 in the 16e. The Neural Accelerators embedded in each GPU core are new to this tier and allow Apple Intelligence to run efficiently on-device rather than leaning on cloud processing. For everyday tasks, the performance gap between the 17e and the standard iPhone 17 will be essentially invisible.

Designer: Apple

MagSafe finally arrives on the “e” lineup, and it’s one of the more consequential additions Apple has made to this tier in years. The 16e’s absence from the MagSafe ecosystem was a genuine frustration, and the 17e corrects it with 15W wireless charging, double the 7.5W of its predecessor. The full ecosystem of snap-on chargers, car mounts, battery packs, and wallet accessories now works as intended. Storage starts at 256GB, double the 16e’s entry point at the exact same $599 price. On a phone shooting 48MP stills and 4K Dolby Vision video natively, that extra headroom is genuinely appreciated.

The C1X modem delivers up to twice the 5G speeds of the C1 in the 16e while consuming 30% less energy, matching the connectivity of the more expensive iPhone Air. The single 48MP Fusion camera pulls double duty with an optical-quality 2x telephoto mode, next-generation portraits with adjustable post-capture depth, and improved low-light processing through the A19’s image pipeline. Ceramic Shield 2 brings 3x better scratch resistance than the previous generation, and a new antireflective coating makes the display noticeably more usable outdoors. Battery life sits at 26 hours of rated video playback, with a 50% charge in 30 minutes using a 20W adapter.

The honest part: the notch is still here in 2026, and the 60Hz display is increasingly hard to defend. The Gemini-integrated Apple Intelligence features remain locked to higher-end models for now, so the 17e gets the core AI suite but not the full picture of where Apple Intelligence is heading. For anyone on an iPhone 11 through 13, this is a clear, confident upgrade. For 16e owners, MagSafe and doubled storage are real improvements but may not justify a full cycle. At $599, the 17e is the most accessible entry point into Apple’s AI era, and that counts for more than the notch counts against it.

Pre-orders open March 4, units ship March 11, starting at $599 for 256GB.

The post iPhone 17e Gets MagSafe but No Dynamic Island or Gemini Apple Intelligence… Is It Worth Buying? first appeared on Yanko Design.