5 Best Tech Gadgets of March 2026

March has a habit of delivering the products that January only promised. CES demos become preorders, concept renders start circulating with real specs attached, and the gadgets worth paying attention to separate themselves from the ones that were only ever meant to look good on a stage. This month’s picks share a common thread: each one challenges an assumption about how a familiar product category should behave, look, or fit into daily life.

What makes these five stand out from the usual parade of iterative upgrades is their willingness to subtract. Less screen time, less bulk, less noise, less compromise between form and function. They are not chasing specs for the sake of benchmarks or piling on features to pad a marketing sheet. From a handheld PC that refuses to apologize for its ambition to a concept camera that wants nothing more than for its user to look up from a screen, these gadgets are worth your time and attention this month.

1. GPD Win 5

The PSP’s body plan endures, and the GPD Win 5 is its most ambitious descendant yet. Packed with an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor, up to 4TB SSD storage, and 32GB of LPDDR5X RAM, this handheld runs a 7-inch 1080p display at 120Hz with Radeon 8060S integrated graphics. Starting at $1,400, this is not a portable console pretending to be a PC. It is a full PC compressed into two hands.

GPD removed the internal battery entirely, replacing it with a detachable 80 Wh pack that clips to the back. A quad heat pipe cooling system handles thermal loads across a TDP range from 28W to 85W on mains power. Hall effect triggers and capacitive joysticks eliminate drift and deadzone, while a proprietary Mini SSD slot pushes transfer speeds beyond microSD limits. Every design choice solves a problem created by one stubborn, central ambition: desktop-class performance in a handheld shell.

What we like

  • The external battery swaps in seconds, and plugging into the 180W adapter unlocks full 85W TDP performance that rivals many desktop setups.
  • Hall effect triggers and capacitive joysticks eliminate the drift issues that plague most handheld PCs after months of heavy use.

What we dislike

  • The external battery makes the device awkward to hold when attached, and the proprietary charger adds bulk to an already heavy travel kit.
  • Pricing starts at $1,400 and climbs past $2,000 for the top configuration, placing it deep into enthusiast-only territory.

2. NanoPhone Pro

Smartphones have spent a decade getting bigger. The NanoPhone Pro walks in the opposite direction with a credit-card-sized body measuring 0.4 x 3.8 x 1.8 inches and weighing just 2.8 ounces. Running Android 12 with Google Play certification, this 4G device handles calls, messages, navigation, and basic apps without demanding pocket real estate. At $99, it is built for minimalists, travelers, and anyone tired of their phone being the loudest object in the room.

The spec sheet is an exercise in deliberate restraint. A 4-inch edge-to-edge IPS touchscreen, dual SIM support, 2MP front and 5MP rear cameras, a 2000mAh battery, and expandable storage via microSD. Face ID handles unlocking. The NanoPhone Pro does not pretend to compete with flagships, and that restraint is the entire point. It is a quiet, pocketable alternative that runs WhatsApp, Google Maps, and everything else that matters without the attention-hungry weight of a modern slab phone.

What we like

  • The credit-card form factor disappears into wallets and running shorts, making it ideal for situations where a full-sized phone feels like overkill.
  • Google Play certification means the app ecosystem works without sideloading, so daily essentials like navigation and messaging run without friction.

What we dislike

  • The 5MP rear camera produces images that are functional at best, making this a poor choice for anyone who photographs anything beyond the occasional note or receipt.
  • Android 12 on a 4-inch screen feels cramped, and typing requires patience and smaller-than-average fingers.

3. Camera (1)

Photography migrated into phones and got buried under notifications. Camera (1), a concept posted on the Nothing Community forum by designer Rishikesh Puthukudy, imagines shooting as a tactile act again. The compact metal body fits a pocket but fills a hand, with all controls on a single edge: a shutter, a circular mode dial with a glyph display, and a D-pad reachable without shifting grip. The design draws from Nothing’s hardware-forward language with circuit-like relief and bead-blasted metal.

A curved light strip around the lens pulses for self-timers, confirms focus, or signals active recording. The engraved lens ring invites twisting rather than pinching. A rear display exists but stays deliberately out of the way, letting physical controls carry most of the interaction. Camera (1) is a student concept, not an official Nothing product, but the question it asks is worth sitting with: in a world where every screen demands something, what would a camera look like if it just wanted its user to notice what was in front of them?

What we like

  • The single-edge control layout keeps eyes on the scene rather than buried in menus, restoring a tactile shooting workflow that phone cameras abandoned years ago.
  • Nothing’s glyph design language translates well to a camera body, delivering mode feedback through simple icons rather than nested software screens.

What we dislike

  • As a concept, Camera (1) exists only as rendered images and community discussion, with no confirmed path to production or a working prototype.
  • The absence of a sensor, lens, and video specs makes it impossible to judge whether it could compete with even entry-level dedicated cameras.

4. Samsung Slac

Earbuds have looked like earbuds for too long. Samsung’s Slac concept, developed within the company’s design incubation programs, reimagines wearable audio as jewelry. Three components make up the system: an open ear ring for audio output, a wrist-worn ring that tracks listening data and doubles as a magnetic dock, and a home charging station. The circular form wraps around the ear without entering the canal, maintaining awareness of surrounding sound while layering music on top.

When listening ends, the ear ring snaps magnetically onto the wrist component, transforming into something that reads as a chunky bracelet rather than stowed tech. AI tracks a full 24-hour audio cycle, building preference profiles from sound intensity, pitch variation, and tonal characteristics. The design team behind Slak understands that Gen Z treats audio devices as expressions of taste, not utilitarian tools. Whether Slac reaches production is an open question, but the proposition that wearable tech should earn its place on the body through aesthetics feels like a direction the entire industry needs to follow.

What we like

  • The open-ear design preserves environmental awareness while delivering audio, solving the isolation problem that makes traditional earbuds socially awkward in many settings.
  • Magnetic docking between ear ring and the wrist component eliminates the pocket-case fumble and turns storage into a wearable moment.

What we dislike

  • Concept status means no confirmed specs on audio quality, battery life, or connectivity, making it impossible to evaluate whether the sound matches the visual ambition.
  • Open-ear audio struggles in noisy environments, and without active noise cancellation, Slac may underwhelm on busy streets or public transit.

5. DAP-1

Vinyl got its comeback, and dedicated digital audio players have been staging a quieter return. The DAP-1 concept by Frankfurt-based 3D artist Florent Porta is one of the most compelling arguments for why that return matters. The device carries a slim rectangular body with an OLED touchscreen, a perforated front-facing speaker grille, and an aesthetic sitting between Teenage Engineering and Nothing’s CMF line. It looks like it arrived from a timeline where iPods evolved into something more considered.

The standout decision is the built-in speaker, a feature most high-end DAPs skip entirely. Porta’s inclusion acknowledges that music is sometimes shared, not just private. The DAP-1 is built around FLAC playback, preserving audio quality without streaming compression artifacts. A USB-C port, 3.5mm AUX output, and illuminated power switch line the top edge, while rubberized feet and torx screws on the rear give the device a repairable, tool-like quality. As a concept, it exists only in renders, but the conversation it starts outweighs most finished products on the market.

What we like

  • The built-in speaker turns a solitary listening device into something social, removing the need for external hardware to share a track with someone next to you.
  • FLAC-first design philosophy treats audio fidelity as the primary feature rather than an afterthought buried in a settings menu.

What we dislike

  • Concept-only status means no production timeline, no pricing, and no way to evaluate real-world audio performance beyond what renders suggest.
  • Dedicated music players occupy a narrow niche, and carrying a separate device for audio requires commitment most listeners will not make.

Where March leaves us

Three of this month’s five picks are concepts. That ratio says something about where consumer tech sits in early 2026: the most exciting ideas are still in render engines, while the products that actually ship tend to iterate rather than invent. The GPD Win 5 and NanoPhone Pro prove that real, purchasable hardware can still surprise, but Camera (1), Slac, and DAP-1 suggest the most interesting design thinking is happening outside production timelines and quarterly earnings calls.

What connects all five is a shared instinct to push back against the default. Against bigger screens, against feature bloat, against the assumption that technology should demand attention rather than earn it. March’s best gadgets respect the space they occupy, whether that space is a pocket, an ear, or the palm of a hand. If even a fraction of these concepts make the jump to production, the rest of 2026 could be far more interesting than the usual upgrade cycle suggests.

The post 5 Best Tech Gadgets of March 2026 first appeared on Yanko Design.

iPhone 20 in 2027: All-Glass, Buttonless, and Highly Unlikely

The iPhone turns 20 in 2027, and Apple apparently wants to throw a party that people will remember. Sources believe that the company is targeting a radical redesign for what will likely be called the iPhone 20, skipping “iPhone 19” the same way it jumped directly to the iPhone X back in 2017. More than just a naming trick, it came with the full-screen OLED design, Face ID, and the removal of the home button, a move that felt genuinely shocking at the time. The expectation building around the iPhone 20 is that history is supposed to repeat itself, only bigger.

The appetite is clearly there. Interest in bold Apple hardware has been riding high on the back of iPhone Fold rumors, and the search interest in “iPhone 20 design” has shot up by over 3,100% year-over-year. People are hungry for a leap, not an incremental shuffle. What Apple is reportedly planning, an all-glass unibody with no physical buttons and no visible cutouts anywhere on the device, is exactly the kind of leap that generates excitement. Whether it generates anything more than that is a genuinely open question.

Images courtesy of: AppleTrack

iPhone X (2017)

What it isn’t: an all-screen phone

Before the imagination runs completely wild, it helps to be specific about what “all-glass” is not. This is not a Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha situation, where the display wraps entirely around the phone like a very expensive, very fragile bracelet. That concept, for all its visual drama, would introduce a cascade of problems: iOS and most apps are built on the assumption that the back of a phone is inert. Making the entire surface interactive requires a fundamental rethinking of how software handles accidental input, palm rejection, and basic navigation, none of which Apple appears to be pursuing here.

Designer: Xiaomi

The more useful comparison is the Vivo APEX from 2019, a concept phone that was genuinely all-glass and buttonless without wrapping the display around the chassis. The APEX had no physical buttons, no headphone jack, no visible ports, and shockingly, no front camera. It was definitely a striking object. It also never made it to retail, because striking objects and reliable everyday devices are not always the same thing.

Designer: vivo

What the rumors are actually saying

The picture assembled from various sources is fairly consistent in its broad strokes. The iPhone 20 is expected to arrive with a four-sided bending OLED display that curves around all edges, a fully glass chassis with no metal frame visible from the outside, camera lenses flush against the glass back with no raised rings or seams, and an under-display front camera with Face ID sensors also moved beneath the glass. Physical buttons disappear entirely, replaced by what Apple has internally codenamed “Project Bongo,” localized haptic zones that simulate a press through piezoelectric ceramics rather than a mechanical click.

Images courtesy of: AppleTrack

Apple has been laying this groundwork for years, whether deliberately or not. MagSafe removed the last port most people used regularly. The solid-state home button on the iPhone 7 trained a generation of users to accept a simulated click as the real thing. Touch ID lived in that fake button for years before Face ID made it irrelevant. Project Bongo itself has been in development since 2021, with the haptic button solution reportedly completing functional verification for the iPhone 20 last October. The staged rollout has already begun: under-display Face ID is expected to debut on the iPhone 18 Pro in 2026, a year before the full transformation arrives.

Why Apple might actually want this

The engineering case for an all-glass, buttonless phone is stronger than it might first appear, and it goes well beyond aesthetics. Glass transmits radio frequencies with far less attenuation than metal, which means that a fully glass chassis removes the need for antenna break lines, those small plastic interruptions visible on metal-framed iPhones. For 5G mmWave frequencies, which are particularly vulnerable to obstruction, that is a meaningful structural advantage, not a cosmetic one.

Physical buttons are also apertures, meaning every button cutout is a potential entry point for water, dust, and debris, not to mention a structural point of weakness. Solid-state haptic zones flush with a continuous glass surface create a fully sealed perimeter by default. And without springs, electrical contacts, or moving parts, the mechanical failure modes that eventually wear out every physical button simply do not apply. There is also a software dimension: a haptic surface can be reprogrammed. The same zone that acts as a volume button in one context can behave differently in a camera app, or respond to a half-press the way a DSLR shutter does. That interaction vocabulary does not exist on a physical button.

Images courtesy of: AppleTrack

The design coherence argument is worth taking seriously, too. iOS 26 introduced the Liquid Glass UI at WWDC 2025, with translucent menus, frosted panes, and depth-layered interfaces that read as software built to live inside a glass object. If the hardware catches up, the iPhone 20 would be the first Apple device where the material logic of the shell and the interface are genuinely continuous, rather than one imitating the other.

Why Apple will definitely not do it, at least not yet

The skepticism case is longer and, in several places, harder to argue around. Start with the glass itself. No glass smartphone has survived all kinds of real-world accidents unscathed, including the iPhone 16 Pro Max with Ceramic Shield 2. The current metal frame does real structural work; it absorbs and distributes impact energy in ways that glass cannot. A four-sided curved display that wraps around what used to be the frame zone eliminates that crumple zone entirely.

Thermal management is a less visible but equally serious issue. Aluminum conducts heat significantly better than glass. The metal frame in current iPhones is part of the thermal pathway, moving heat from the logic board outward. Glass is a poor conductor and a poor radiator, and with Apple Intelligence pushing sustained on-device AI inference, the thermal load is growing, not shrinking. Apple would need expanded vapor chambers or novel heat-bridge materials to compensate, none of which have been confirmed.

Then there is the under-display camera. Samsung introduced UDC technology with the Galaxy Z Fold3 in 2021 and used it through the Fold6. Image quality was consistently criticized across all four generations, and Samsung is now reportedly abandoning it for future foldables due to persistent optical and cost challenges. Apple is reportedly moving in the opposite direction, but with a twist. It might use the under-display camera primarily for Face ID’s infrared sensors rather than the selfie camera, which sidesteps the worst degradation but does not resolve long-term selfie quality under glass.

Designer: Samsung

Accessibility is a concern that gets less coverage than drop tests, but it definitely deserves more. Blind and visually impaired users rely on physically locatable controls as navigational anchors, such as the raised profile of a button. Flush haptic zones remove that landmark. There is also the “dead device” recovery problem: a bricked iPhone requires holding a specific physical button combination to enter recovery mode. Whether solid-state haptic buttons can operate at the firmware level, before iOS loads, has not been confirmed. Case and accessory compatibility adds another layer; a wraparound display that curves into what is currently the frame zone fundamentally changes how a protective case grips the device, since the element that used to grip the frame now grips the screen.

The human factor is harder to engineer than the glass

The technology story surrounding the iPhone 20 is genuinely fascinating, and some of it will almost certainly happen. Under-display Face ID on the iPhone 18 Pro is close enough to be treated as confirmed. The full vision, no buttons, no cutouts, glass everywhere, is a different question. Manufacturing challenge is described as “extraordinarily complex,” component manufacturers are on the fence, and the expected price point will likely exceed the current Pro Max tier. Those are not the conditions under which Apple tends to ship a complete reimagining all at once.

But the technical hurdles might not be the hardest part. People have strong, specific feelings about physical buttons in ways they do not always articulate until the buttons are gone. The haptic home button on the iPhone 7 worked well enough that most users stopped noticing it within weeks. Extending that same illusion across every tactile control point on the device, in cold weather, through a case, while the phone is vibrating with an incoming call, and across several years of daily use, is a different challenge than a single button in a fixed location. Whether that feels like liberation or a slow-building frustration might depend less on the engineering and more on the person holding it.

Images courtesy of: AppleTrack

The post iPhone 20 in 2027: All-Glass, Buttonless, and Highly Unlikely first appeared on Yanko Design.

DOOGEE Fire 7 Ultra rugged smartphone doubles as a push-to-talk radio for instant team communication

Rugged smartphones have long been DOOGEE’s playground, as the brand frequently experiments with bold ideas that blur the line between utility gadget and everyday smartphone. Past releases have showcased this experimental streak successfully. The DOOGEE S200 embraced a mech-inspired aesthetic with a design that looked more like a piece of futuristic equipment than a typical handset, while the DOOGEE S98 leaned into spy-gadget territory with a secondary rear display and an unmistakably tactical vibe. Even more unusual was the DOOGEE S119, a device that literally mounted a smartwatch-like display on its back.

The newly introduced DOOGEE Fire 7 Ultra continues that spirit of experimentation but shifts the focus toward communication rather than design theatrics. Instead of simply building a phone that survives harsh environments, DOOGEE is positioning the Fire 7 Ultra as a hybrid device that combines smartphone functionality with the instant communication capabilities of a professional two-way radio system.

Designer: DOOGEE

At the heart of the Fire 7 Ultra is its Push-to-Talk Over Cellular (PoC) system, a feature designed to transform the phone into a real-time communication hub for teams. Using cellular or Wi-Fi connectivity, the device allows users to initiate instant voice communication with a single press of a dedicated PTT button on the side. This setup enables one-to-one or group communication similar to traditional walkie-talkies but without the range limitations typically associated with radio hardware. As long as there is network connectivity, the communication range is essentially unlimited, making it suitable for field teams, logistics crews, event staff, and emergency responders.

The device also incorporates a short-range Bluetooth intercom mode for situations where cellular coverage is unavailable. This feature allows nearby users to communicate directly with each other without relying on network infrastructure, which can be particularly useful in environments such as tunnels, forests, or construction zones. Supporting these communication features is a powerful 125-decibel speaker powered by a 34mm, 3.5W driver, ensuring that voice transmissions remain clear even in noisy outdoor environments.

Durability remains a USP of the Fire 7 Ultra’s design philosophy. The phone carries IP68 and IP69K water and dust resistance ratings and meets MIL-STD-810H durability standards, allowing it to withstand water immersion, dust exposure, and accidental drops from around 1.5 meters. The rugged construction is paired with a large 6.6-inch IPS display featuring a 90Hz refresh rate and HD+ resolution, protected with reinforced glass designed to handle demanding outdoor conditions. Powering the device is MediaTek’s Dimensity 6300 chipset, a 6nm processor that supports 5G connectivity while delivering efficient performance for everyday tasks and communication-heavy workloads. The phone ships with 8GB of RAM, which can be virtually expanded up to 32GB, alongside 256GB of internal storage and a microSD slot for further expansion.

A massive 13,000mAh battery keeps the device operational for extended field use, reducing the need for frequent charging during long shifts or outdoor expeditions. The phone supports 33W fast charging and even includes reverse charging capabilities, allowing it to power smaller devices such as earbuds or smartwatches when needed. The camera setup is straightforward but capable, featuring a 64-megapixel main camera paired with a 2-megapixel macro lens and a 16-megapixel front-facing camera. Running on Android 15, the phone also supports features such as NFC for contactless payments, side-mounted fingerprint recognition, facial unlock, and a triple card slot that accommodates two SIM cards and a microSD card simultaneously.

The DOOGEE Fire 7 Ultra phone is currently available at official stores and select online retailers, with pricing around $360 for the 8GB RAM and 256GB storage variant.

The post DOOGEE Fire 7 Ultra rugged smartphone doubles as a push-to-talk radio for instant team communication first appeared on Yanko Design.

Carriers Want This BlackBerry-Style Phone – I Tried It at MWC

When Clicks unveiled the Clicks Communicator at CES 2026, the device immediately stood out in a sea of look-alike smartphones. It pairs a physical QWERTY keyboard with a communication-first philosophy that feels intentionally different from the current slab phone crowd. Clicks also shared several specifications at the time, yet it did not confirm exactly when the phone would launch.

At a Mobile World Congress (MWC) off-site event in Barcelona, Clicks offered a clearer update on where the Communicator stands today. The company used the event to signal that the project is progressing beyond the early reveal phase. It positioned the Communicator as moving steadily toward launch.

Designer: Clicks

Clicks showcased the Communicator to media and potential partners, and I had the opportunity to briefly go hands-on with the device. The unit on display was still a mockup rather than a final production model. Even so, it offered a useful glimpse at how the hardware direction is taking shape.

In hand, the Communicator feels nice and compact, and it sits comfortably in the palm. The balance feels considered, and the overall shape makes it easy to grip without feeling slippery or awkward. Typing also felt comfortable during my short time with it, which is the “make or break” moment for any keyboard phone.

The build felt solid, even in mockup form. One of the most interesting design touches is a magnetic, swappable back panel that snaps on with a confident fit. That modular detail gives the phone a more personal, tool-like vibe, and it suggests Clicks is thinking about long-term ownership rather than quick upgrades.

According to Adrian Li, founder and CEO of Clicks, the Communicator has generated significant interest from the industry over the past few months. Li said the company has been approached by several mobile carriers as well as major retailers that are interested in bringing the device to market. For a young hardware company entering the competitive smartphone space, that attention could be critical.

Carrier partnerships in particular could play a decisive role in the Communicator’s success. While some niche smartphones rely primarily on direct online sales, carrier support can expand a device’s reach through retail stores and bundled service plans. Li noted that Clicks is currently in discussions with potential carrier partners as it explores different distribution strategies for the phone.

Although the prototype shown at MWC was not yet fully functional, the hardware design already reflects the Communicator’s core idea of efficient communication. The device features a compact 4-inch class AMOLED display positioned above a physical backlit QWERTY keyboard. The keyboard is designed to deliver tactile feedback for fast, accurate typing, and it also supports gesture controls for scrolling and navigation.

Under the hood, the Communicator is powered by MediaTek’s Dimensity 8300 processor and runs Android 16. That combination should provide access to the full Android app ecosystem while keeping the experience centered on messaging and productivity. The phone is expected to ship with 256GB of internal storage and support microSD expansion of up to 2TB, which is increasingly rare in modern smartphones.

The rest of the hardware stays firmly in modern smartphone territory. The Communicator includes a 50 MP rear camera with optical image stabilization, plus a 24 MP front camera for video calls and selfies. A 4,000 mAh silicon carbon battery powers the device, with support for USB-C charging and Qi2 wireless charging.

Connectivity options include 5G, Wi Fi 6, Bluetooth, and NFC. A combination of nano SIM and eSIM support gives users flexibility when choosing carriers. The Communicator also retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, which will matter to power users and anyone who still prefers wired audio.

Clicks is building several software features around the phone’s communication first pitch. The device includes a Message Hub that aggregates conversations from multiple messaging platforms into a single interface, which should reduce app hopping. A customizable notification light known as the Signal LED can display different colors depending on which contact or app is reaching out.

Despite its productivity focus, the Communicator is not meant to be a limited-function device. Clicks positions it as either a primary smartphone for users who prioritize messaging or a secondary device that complements a larger entertainment-focused phone. That flexibility could be a key part of its appeal, especially for people who want a more focused tool without giving up modern apps.

As for when the Communicator will reach consumers, Clicks says more information is coming soon. According to the company, the official launch date will be revealed in roughly two months. Until then, the Communicator remains in the promising middle ground between concept and product.

For now, the Communicator blends nostalgia with modern smartphone capabilities in a way that feels deliberate rather than gimmicky. The compact in-hand feel, comfortable typing, and sturdy build are encouraging signs, even if this was not yet a final unit. If carrier and retail interest continues to build, Clicks may be on track to ship a device that serves people who still value fast typing and focused communication in an increasingly distraction-heavy mobile world.

The post Carriers Want This BlackBerry-Style Phone – I Tried It at MWC first appeared on Yanko Design.

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold Leaks Early With a Familiar Design and One Noticeable Change

The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is shaping up to be exactly the phone you already know, made marginally better in the ways that are easiest to improve. CAD-based renders obtained by Android Headlines in partnership with OnLeaks offer what appears to be the first real look at the device, and they suggest Google’s foldable trajectory for 2026 is exactly what the last two years implied: the formula is set, and the job now is refinement. The front reportedly looks functionally identical to the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, same corner curvature, same hole-punch placement in the top-right of the cover display, same uniform raised bezels that double as protection for the inner screen. From the outside, you could be forgiven for not noticing the difference at all.

Flip it over and you’ll notice one fairly minor design change that differentiates this Fold from its predecessor. The camera island appears to have been reworked so the LED flash and microphone share the upper pill-shaped cutout with one of the rear lenses, rather than sitting awkwardly adjacent to everything else. The result looks like a cleaner, more coherent module, one designed with intent rather than assembled around constraints. Camera bumps are the first thing people actually see on a folded phone sitting on a table, so even a subtle improvement registers. Google reportedly kept the flat backplate, centered logo, and aluminum frame, which means the overall silhouette reads as a modest update rather than a rethink.

Designer: OnLeaks for AndroidHeadline

Based on CAD measurements, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold would drop from 10.8mm to 10.1mm folded, and from 5.2mm to 4.8mm unfolded, while height and unfolded width stay exactly the same at 155.2 x 150.4mm. Several Android foldables are already sitting below 9mm folded, so even if these numbers hold, the Pixel would still have ground to make up against its direct competition. That said, 0.7mm less in your pocket is 0.7mm less, and the projected unfolded profile at 4.8mm would be genuinely slim for a device with this much glass in it. The thinning happens entirely in depth, which means the familiar footprint would stay intact for existing Pixel Fold users considering an upgrade.

The Tensor G6 is expected as the headline spec upgrade, reportedly manufactured by TSMC on a 3nm process and possibly running a 7-core configuration, though that last detail is particularly unverified. The more interesting rumored hardware story is the cameras. The Pixel 10 Pro Fold shipped with a setup that sat below the Pixel 10 Pro in several respects, including an inferior ultrawide, which was a strange position for a $1,799 device. Google is rumored to be course-correcting here, possibly borrowing hardware from the Pixel 10 Pro lineup, though no confirmed specs have surfaced. The pressure is real regardless, given where Samsung and others have pushed foldable camera systems over the last cycle.

Google’s internal roadmap had reportedly targeted $1,500 for the Pixel 11 Pro Fold, but tariffs and rising memory costs have apparently complicated that figure considerably. The Pixel 10 Pro Fold launched at $1,799, and if current market conditions hold, the new model could land at or above that number. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 sits at $1,999 and the new Motorola Razr Fold is at EUR 1,999, so premium foldables have settled into a price tier that treats four figures as a floor. Battery, display sizes, IP68 resistance, Pixelsnap and Qi2 wireless charging are all expected to carry over, meaning there are no obvious additions to justify a steep price increase, just refinements. August 2026 is the rumored launch window, consistent with Google’s last two announcement cycles.

The Pixel 10a reportedly followed the Pixel 9a playbook with minor tweaks, and the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s biggest change was its display. Incremental releases have become the dominant mode across flagship Android, and if these leaks are accurate, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold fits that rhythm without apology. Whether that reads as frustrating or reassuring probably depends on how you felt about the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, because this device looks built squarely for people who wanted that phone to be slightly thinner with a better camera story.

The post Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold Leaks Early With a Familiar Design and One Noticeable Change first appeared on Yanko Design.

Your $1,200 Phone Looks Boring Next to These 5 Concepts

Look at the phones announced this year, like those revealed at MWC 2026 last week, and you will notice something. They are all faster, thinner, and shinier than last year’s models, and yet none of them feel particularly surprising. Cameras gained another sensor. Bezels shrank another millimeter. Battery life improved by an amount that is technically measurable but practically indistinguishable from the model before. The industry has gotten so good at making phones incrementally better that it has almost forgotten to ask whether they could be genuinely different.

That is where concept phones come in. Not all of them are practical, and not all of them will ship. But the five designs here do something that the latest Galaxy or iPhone cannot: they make you pause and reconsider what a phone actually is, and what it could be if the people designing it were not also worrying about carrier approvals, supply chains, and quarterly earnings. Some are functional prototypes shown on actual show floors. Others exist purely as design arguments. All of them are worth thinking about.

TECNO Magnetic Modular System

Phones have been getting thinner for years, which sounds like progress until you think about what got traded away in the process. Removable batteries went first, then expandable storage, then headphone jacks. Every feature that required physical complexity was quietly dropped in the name of a slimmer profile. TECNO’s Magnetic Modular System, shown at MWC 2026, challenges that logic directly. Rather than cramming every possible capability into a single fixed body, it keeps the phone lean by design and lets you snap on what you need, when you actually need it.

Designer: TECNO

The system works through a magnetic interconnection technology that attaches hardware modules directly to the phone. Telephoto lenses, action cameras, additional battery packs, and over a dozen other components can be added or removed in seconds. The core argument is straightforward: a phone that tries to do everything is permanently weighed down by everything it carries. A phone that adapts to the moment is only as heavy as today demands. Whether TECNO can pull off what Google’s Project Ara could not is another matter, but the design thinking here is at least pointed at the right problem.

What we liked

  • The base phone stays slim and fully usable on its own, so you’re not carrying the bulk of a photography rig on days when all you really need is a phone.
  • The modular suite covers a wide enough range of options to be genuinely practical, from camera upgrades to battery expansion, rather than limiting you to a couple of cosmetic add-ons.

What we disliked

  • Using the system to its full potential requires thinking ahead. If you leave the telephoto module at home, the hiking trail is not going to wait for you to go back and get it.
  • The smaller modules seem like prime candidates for disappearing to the bottom of a bag, while the larger ones can add considerable bulk when stacked, which rather defeats the point of keeping the base phone slim.

HONOR Alpha Robot Phone

Most phones sit on a desk and wait. The HONOR Alpha does not. Demonstrated as a functional prototype at MWC 2026, this is a phone with a 4DoF gimbal system inside the camera bump, built around what HONOR describes as the industry’s smallest micro motor. Three-axis mechanical stabilization runs alongside an AI tracking engine, and a double-tap locks onto any subject, following it through movement, obstructions, and sudden changes in direction. The person who used to carry a separate DJI Osmo just to get steady footage now has a reasonable question to ask.

Designer: HONOR

The gimbal also does something harder to categorize. HONOR designed it to express what they call embodied AI interaction, meaning the phone physically responds to its environment. It nods during video calls. It reframes itself to keep you centered without being asked. It moves when music plays through its speakers. Phones have had personalities before, mostly through notification lights and ringtones. The Alpha just happens to have something closer to a neck.

What we liked

  • Giving AI a physical presence, rather than just a voice or a chat window, makes the technology feel more tangible and less like a background service you forgot was running.
  • The built-in gimbal meaningfully expands what the main camera can do without requiring any extra gear, turning a stationary device into something closer to an autonomous one-person film crew.

What we disliked

  • Motorized components inside a device that gets dropped, sat on, and shoved into pockets will eventually wear down. A gimbal mechanism that fails out of warranty is a discouraging prospect.
  • The behavioral features, nodding, swaying, tracking your face, are the kind of thing that feels charming in a demo and potentially exhausting at 7 AM when all you want to do is check your messages.

iFROG RS1

Every phone released this year is a tall rectangle, some taller than others. The iFROG RS1, shown at MWC 2026, is a square, which already makes it unusual before you get to the part where it twists open. Built around a 3.4-inch square display, the RS1 has a rotating lower section that reveals one of two things depending on the variant you’re looking at: a full QWERTY keyboard with raised, tactile keycaps, or a gamepad with a D-pad, a four-button cluster, and Select and Start. No price and no release date were announced at MWC, because the hardware itself is the pitch.

Designer: iFROG

The keyboard variant has a clear and underserved audience. The people who have quietly resented touchscreen typing for fifteen years are not a small group, and the Unihertz Titan has been proving that niche quietly for a while. The gamepad version is a stranger and arguably more interesting proposition. Running Android with physical controls in a square body draws instant comparisons to the Motorola Flipout, a 2010 Android phone that did something structurally similar and was adored by a small crowd before being largely ignored by everyone else.

What we liked

  • The rotating mechanism keeps the phone genuinely compact in normal use, so the keyboard or game controls are there when you want them and completely invisible when you don’t.
  • Adding physical input without making the phone permanently thicker or wider is a trade-off very few devices have come close to solving, and the RS1 at least makes a credible attempt.

What we disliked

  • Modern software is built almost entirely around tall, vertical screens, so the square format creates real friction with apps, video, and content that all assume a rectangular display.
  • Choosing between the keyboard and gamepad variants at the point of purchase is a long-term commitment. If your priorities shift, or you simply want both, you are looking at two separate phones.

TECNO POVA Neon

Some phones try to solve a problem, but the POVA Neon honestly isn’t that kind of phone. TECNO’s other MWC 2026 concept uses ionized inert gas lighting, the same technology that gives neon signs their glow, to create a branching luminescent effect on the back panel that sits somewhere between a lightning bolt and a circuit trace. TECNO is not claiming this makes the phone faster or the camera better. The claim is simpler and more honest: a phone’s back doesn’t have to be an inert sheet of glass waiting to collect fingerprints.

Designer: TECNO

As design statements go, that one is actually worth taking seriously. Most phone backs are the most visible surface on a device that billions of people carry every day, and they’re almost universally empty. The POVA Neon asks what happens when that surface does something. The answer here is that it glows, which is not practical and doesn’t need to be. Concept work isn’t obligated to be practical. It’s obligated to make you look at a familiar object differently, and a phone that pulses with light like a neon sign in a diner window at least does that.

What we liked

  • Treating the back panel as a dynamic surface rather than a passive sheet of glass is a genuinely fresh direction, and using ionized gas to do it is unlike anything else currently on the market.
  • As a concept, it opens up real questions about how materials and lighting could make phone design more expressive without requiring any changes to the screen whatsoever.

What we disliked

  • Ionized gas channels in a device that flexes under grip pressure, absorbs impacts, and hits the floor on a semi-regular basis seem like they would not survive the lifespan of the phone itself.
  • A protective case, which most people use, would cover the entire back panel and make the concept completely invisible. It is a design that fundamentally cannot coexist with the most basic act of protecting your phone.

Pixel Dynamics iPhone Fold Concept

Foldable phones keep running into the same set of problems. The phone has to fold, which means the screen has to fold, which means the screen eventually creases at the hinge line, the hinge develops resistance over time, and the finished device ends up thicker than either of the two things it’s trying to be. Pixel Dynamic’s iPhone Fold concept approaches the whole premise from a different direction. Keep the iPhone exactly as it is. Add a separate foldable screen to the back.

The main iPhone body stays rigid and conventional. A thin, flexible secondary display sits raised on a platform above the rear panel, and when needed, it unfolds outward to create a larger, roughly square tablet surface. The phone itself does not flex, leaving the primary display completely untouched. In daily use, it feels and functions like a normal iPhone, because it essentially is one. That said, the raised platform adds thickness, wireless charging is probably absent, and using the camera while the secondary screen is unfolded becomes nearly impossible since it sits directly over the lenses. Apple almost certainly will never endorse the design, but as a thought experiment about whether a foldable screen and a foldable phone actually need to be the same thing, it’s one of the more original answers anyone has put forward.

What we liked

  • Treating the foldable display as a separate, discrete component rather than the phone’s primary structural element is unconventional thinking, and it raises genuinely interesting questions about repairability and modular design.
  • The concept challenges the assumption that a foldable phone has to mean a folding device, which is exactly the kind of first-principles questioning that occasionally turns into something the industry actually builds five years later.

What we disliked

  • Getting a raised foldable display to sit flush, function reliably through daily use, and survive the realities of a pocket likely puts this well outside what current manufacturing can deliver.
  • Apple’s tendency to design through subtraction rather than addition makes this particular execution, with its visible raised platform and external folding mechanism, almost impossible to imagine coming from Cupertino in any recognizable form.

The post Your $1,200 Phone Looks Boring Next to These 5 Concepts first appeared on Yanko Design.

First look of new OnePlus 15T revealed, hints two new colors and high-end features

OnePlus has recently redefined what it means to “never settle” with its OnePlus 13 and 13T smartphones. Now, the company is back in the spotlight amid rumors of another device that appears similar in design but is expected to come with a more capable approach.

Over the past week, the OEM has faced growing speculation and anticipation surrounding the possible launch of this new smartphone. And now it seems OnePlus is openly teasing the device, sharing its images that reveal two new colorways along with details about the phone’s design and the layout of its camera array.

Designer: OnePlus

In the images that were shared on Weibo, a Chinese microblogging website, the upcoming phone is revealed in green and brown colors, but with a design that seems very much inspired by the 13T. The phone in question is the OnePlus 15T, which is showing up in its real self – ahead of a launch – for the first time. Most of what we have been able to know about the handset in the recent past has been by way of speculations and hearsay only.

Now, for the first time, we are getting an official update about how the OnePlus 15T will look and the color options you should be able to get. When it comes to looks, from the available pictures, the 15T appears very similar to the 13T. Phone could have a similar 6.32-inch AMOLED display and a rounded off design with a slim bezel, and as seen, would come in new green and brown colorways.

On the reverse side, the phone reveals a dual rear camera housed within a rounded square module toward the top left corner of the phone. Inside the camera housing are the two rear sensors and an LED flash. A setup which – like the design – is similar to that of the predecessor in the same size segment. With the design and new colors, the revealed images also show that the new phone will get a matte finish on the rear panel.

According to the other details already confirmed, the OnePlus 15T will feature a slim bezel and rounded corners for a comfortable grip and usage. Arriving with an AMOLED display only 6.32 inches in size and an upgraded periscope telephoto camera alongside the 3.5x optical zoom, the OnePlus 15T, despite its compact size, gets some high-end features. The phone is likely to draw power from a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC with 16GB of RAM. It will feature up to an IP69K rating, making the handset capable of handling dust, water dips, and high-pressure water sprays with equal confidence.

Before you consider size and durability as top facets of the OnePlus 15T, just spare a thought for its 7,500mAh battery, rumored to support 100W wired and 50W wireless fast-charging. OnePlus 15T is likely to launch in China later this month, and that’s really when we will have the definite details about the phone. Before that, most of it was only rumors!

The post First look of new OnePlus 15T revealed, hints two new colors and high-end features first appeared on Yanko Design.

5 Wildest Design Trends at MWC 2026: Nodding Phones and Tiny Robots

Every year, MWC arrives with the promise of seeing the future of mobile technology, or at least a very expensive approximation of it. The 2026 edition in Barcelona was the event’s 20th anniversary in the city, and while nearly 105,000 people showed up, there was a noticeable shift in what filled the booths. Fewer headline-grabbing product launches, more working concepts and proofs of concept across every category imaginable.

That’s not necessarily a bad thing. When manufacturers stop competing on a single spec and start showing what they’re thinking about next, the underlying patterns get easier to read. Five trends cut across product categories at MWC 2026, crossing from smartphones to laptops to robotic companions. None of them belongs to one company, and none of them is going away anytime soon.

Robots got a size reduction

For the past couple of years, humanoid robots have been stealing the show at tech events. They walk, they wave, they occasionally fall over, and everyone takes a video. The problem is that a bipedal robot that can fetch a package from across the room is not something most people actually need sitting in their office. MWC 2026 suggested the industry might be starting to figure that out.

The robots worth talking about this year were small, desk-bound, and refreshingly honest about what they could do. Lenovo’s AI Workmate Concept is a desk-mounted unit that handles document scanning, note organization, and presentation help through voice, gesture, and spatial interaction, processing everything on-device. It can even project content onto your desk or a nearby wall, which sounds gimmicky until you think about how useful a hands-free reference surface actually is during a meeting.

Samsung Display’s OLED AI Mini PetBot takes the idea in a more playful direction. It is a pocket-sized robot with a 1.34-inch circular OLED screen for a face, reacting to voice and touch with animated expressions. It comes from Samsung’s display division rather than its product team, so this is less a product announcement and more a demonstration of where the panel technology can go.

AI is learning to show its feelings

Most people’s experience of AI right now involves typing into a box and getting text back, or asking a question into empty air and hearing a voice that sounds like it was recorded in a server room. It works, but it does not feel particularly warm. A cluster of products at MWC 2026 was specifically trying to fix that, not by making AI smarter, but by making it more expressive.

Lenovo’s AI Work Companion Concept looks like a desk clock, which is either a clever disguise or a statement about how unobtrusive AI should be. Its AI planning system, called Thought Bubble, syncs tasks and schedules from across your devices to build a daily plan, monitors screen time, nudges you to take breaks, and delivers an end-of-week summary of what you actually got done. The behavioral framing is deliberately light. The goal is to build a rhythm rather than manage a list, and the device is designed to feel like a presence in your workspace rather than another notification surface.

TCL’s Tbot takes a similar approach for a younger audience. It pairs with the company’s MOVETIME kids smartwatch, so when a child gets home and drops the watch onto Tbot’s magnetic dock, the robot comes to life as a study companion and bedtime storyteller. The physical handoff is a considered design decision, a tangible trigger rather than an app to open.

Honor’s Robot Phone extends the idea into the phone itself. A motorized titanium alloy gimbal arm holds a 200-megapixel camera that nods when it agrees, shakes when it doesn’t, and tracks you across the room. Honor plans to sell it in the second half of 2026, which means it will be the first of this particular batch of emotionally expressive AI devices to actually land in someone’s hands.

Modular design, this time as a practical argument

Modular phones have been promised before: Project Ara, LG G5, and Fairphone at various stages of their evolution. The pitch is always appealing: buy a base device, then upgrade the camera, swap the battery, add what you need. The reality has usually involved awkward connectors, software that doesn’t quite work, and products that disappear within two years. MWC 2026 had a notable cluster of modular devices, and what made them interesting is that each was solving a different version of the problem.

Lenovo’s ThinkBook Modular AI PC Concept approaches it from the laptop side. The 14-inch base connects to a secondary screen via pogo pins, and that screen can sit alongside the base as a travel monitor, mount on the lid for face-to-face sharing, or replace the keyboard to create a dual-display setup. Interchangeable I/O ports, covering USB Type-A, USB Type-C, and HDMI, mean the connection layout changes with the workflow. It’s a concept aimed at professionals who spend their day switching between contexts, and the argument is about longevity and flexibility rather than upgradeability for its own sake.

TECNO’s Modular Magnetic Interconnection Technology works from the phone outward. The base device is 4.9mm thick, which is thinner than anything Apple or Samsung currently sells, and that extreme thinness turns out to be the point. Modules, including telephoto lenses, battery packs, microphones, wallets, and speakers, attach magnetically to the rear without making the phone ungainly.

Ulefone’s RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro is less elegant but arguably more practical: a rugged phone whose rear camera detaches and operates independently as a wearable action camera. Three very different products, three different price tiers, and the same underlying idea. A device you can reconfigure is a device you keep longer.

The keyboard is making a serious case for itself

BlackBerry’s demise was supposed to be the end of physical keyboards on phones. Touch screens were better, the argument went, because they could be anything. And they were right, mostly. But they were also cold, imprecise for fast typing, and they ate half your screen every time you needed to type more than a sentence. A small but persistent group of users never fully made peace with that trade-off, and in 2026, they suddenly had options.

The Unihertz Titan 2 Elite was at MWC with a 4.3-inch AMOLED display at 120Hz above a physical QWERTY keyboard with touch-sensitive keys that also function as a trackpad. The aluminum body and slimmed-down proportions mark a clear departure from the chunky, ruggedized aesthetic of earlier Titan phones. This one is trying to look like something you would actually carry every day.

The Clicks Communicator comes from the opposite direction: Clicks already makes keyboard cases for iPhones, and the Communicator is a logical next step, a standalone Android phone built around the companion philosophy for people who want physical keys without abandoning modern smartphone basics.

The iFROG RS1 is the strangest and most interesting of the three. It is a square phone with a 3.4-inch display that sits on top of a rotating lower section. Twist it one way, and you get a full QWERTY keyboard with tactile keycaps. Twist it the other way, and you get a gamepad with a D-pad and face buttons, which unavoidably recalls the Game Boy and the Motorola Flipout in equal measure. What all three of these share is a belief that tactile input has genuine ergonomic value that glass surfaces haven’t replaced, just obscured. Whether that belief translates into mainstream sales is a different question.

Design became the headline spec

Phones have always been designed objects. But for most of the last decade, the design conversation at launch events came after the camera specs, after the processor benchmark, after the battery capacity. At MWC 2026, a handful of manufacturers flipped that order. The design was the lead, and everything else followed.

Honor’s Magic V6 is the most straightforward example. At 8.75mm closed, it is one of the thinnest foldables on the market, and Honor announced that measurement with the same emphasis as a performance figure might receive. The engineering behind it is genuinely impressive: IP68 and IP69 water resistance on a foldable, combined with a 6,660mAh silicon-carbon battery, means thinness was not achieved by sacrificing durability or endurance. It’s a difficult combination, and the design is doing real work to make it possible rather than just looking good on a spec sheet.

The CMF collaborations told a different story about design as positioning. Infinix’s NOTE 60 Ultra, developed with Pininfarina, applied the Italian studio’s automotive logic to the phone’s rear panel. The result is a single continuous sheet of Gorilla Glass Victus covering the triple camera array, a thin floating taillight strip, and a hidden active matrix notification display, all completely flush. No bump. The colorways, Torino Black, Monza Red, Amalfi Blue, and Roma Silver, are not accidental.

TECNO’s partnership with Tonino Lamborghini produced the TAURUS gaming PC, a water-cooled mini system with a 10,000mm² copper cold plate, and the POVA Metal phone, whose 241-pixel rear LED dot matrix turns the notification surface into a deliberate design feature. At the concept end, TECNO’s POVA Neon filled its rear panel with ionized inert gas to produce plasma patterns that chase your fingertip across the glass, which is either the most impractical phone feature ever conceived or a fascinating question about what a phone’s surface is actually for.

The Lenovo Yoga Book Pro 3D lets 3D creators sculpt directly on a dual-screen laptop without additional hardware. The Motorola Maxwell AI pendant turned conference transcription into something you wear around your neck. None of these are shipping products. At MWC 2026, that seemed less like a limitation and more like the whole point: showing what you think design can do, before you have to prove it.

The post 5 Wildest Design Trends at MWC 2026: Nodding Phones and Tiny Robots first appeared on Yanko Design.

This Square Phone Rotates Open to a BlackBerry or Game Boy Setup

Smartphones have gotten pretty good at being the same thing. Every year, they get a little taller, a little thinner, and a little more difficult to tell apart in a lineup. That’s fine for most people, but it does make MWC 2026 feel like a bit of a slog, until you spot something genuinely weird on the show floor, like a square phone that rotates open to reveal either a physical keyboard or a game controller underneath.

The iFrog RS1 is about the size of a closed fist, built around a 3.4-inch square display that sits on top of a rotating lower section. Twist it open, and you get one of two things depending on which variant you’re holding: a full QWERTY keyboard with raised, tactile keycaps, or a gamepad with a D-pad, a four-color face button cluster, and Select/Start buttons. Both run Android on a MediaTek Helio G18 chipset, with storage and RAM left open for whoever configures the platform.

Designer: FROG

That last part matters. iFrog is an ODM, or original design manufacturer, which means the RS1 is less a finished retail product and more a concept that carriers or brands can take and build on. The hardware is the pitch. Everything else is a conversation, which also explains why no pricing or release date was announced at MWC.

Of the two variants, the keyboard is the more predictable crowd-pleaser. There’s a genuinely underserved group of Android users who never stopped wanting physical keys. The BlackBerry crowd never fully disbanded, and phones like the Unihertz Titan have quietly built followings on exactly that. If you’ve ever tried composing a long email on a touchscreen while standing on a moving train, the appeal needs no further explanation.

The gamepad version is a stranger proposition, and honestly, the more interesting one. Running Android means emulation is an obvious draw, and the handheld gaming community noticed immediately. The visual comparison that kept surfacing online was the Motorola Flipout, a 2010 Android phone with a square body and rotating keyboard. There’s something both flattering and sobering in that parallel, since the Flipout was beloved by a small group and largely ignored by everyone else.

There are some caveats, though. No shoulder buttons on the gamepad variant rules out a lot of titles that need them. The swivel hinge is the structural heart of the design and also the part most likely to wear down. iFrog is new enough that questions about long-term software support are fair ones to ask, and the 3.4-inch screen is a genuine trade-off, not a quirk.

Still, the RS1 is a good reminder that the design space for phones is wider than what’s on shelves. It fits in a pocket and in the palm of a hand. It has buttons. It does a trick. What nobody knows yet is whether any of that adds up to something people actually want to live with.

The post This Square Phone Rotates Open to a BlackBerry or Game Boy Setup first appeared on Yanko Design.

Glyph Lights? Tecno Put Actual Plasma Lightning Inside One Of Its Phones At MWC 2026

While Nothing flits with Glyph Matrixes and Bars, Tecno decided to infuse the soul of Thor into its latest phone concept. Dubbed the Pova Neon, this phone was possibly the most unique thing we’ve seen in the phone market in a while. Built inside the back of a phone is an inert gas chamber that emits beams of plasma thanks to high voltages that’s passed through the gas. Touch the glass panel separating you from the plasma, and the lightning gathers around your fingertips, quite like it would around a tesla coil, if you ever saw or owned one as a kid.

The detail (and the execution) is impressive, but it begs the question – who needs this?! Why does this exist? And what exactly is its purpose? Why must I have lightning trapped inside the back of my smartphone? Doesn’t it already do enough?? Or maybe the plasma lights are a great distraction from your doomscrolling habit. I’d probably pick staring at random beams of light than scroll through the news…

Designer: Tecno

The Pova Neon is just a concept. Tecno doesn’t plan on building this at all, not just because it’s complicated – it’s also fragile, fairly dangerous, and really doesn’t do much to make the phone better. Adding inert gases at the back removes the ability to add a wireless charging coil there, which means no MagSafe either. You put a case on the phone and you lose all novelty immediately. And drop the phone and you genuinely risk a fairly serious fire hazard.

But for what it’s worth, the phone is a bundle of fun. In the bright lights of MWC, the plasma wasn’t fairly visible. But the minute we put a coat around the phone to block light out, the lightning looked genuinely amazing. The random patterns, the interaction with your fingertip, it’s all entirely cosmetic, but it’s also somewhat cosmic! Good job flexing your tech chops, Tecno. I mean, besides the fact that they actually built a modular smartphone ecosystem which managed to win YD’s Best of MWC Award!

The post Glyph Lights? Tecno Put Actual Plasma Lightning Inside One Of Its Phones At MWC 2026 first appeared on Yanko Design.