Volvo XC60 T8 AWD Ultra Review: Scandinavian Calm in a Segment That Prefers to Shout

PROS:


  • Exceptional interior material quality – Nappa leather, open-pore wood, and real aluminum trim create a tactile experience that rivals vehicles costing significantly more

  • 455 hp with 32-35 miles of EV range – Strong plug-in hybrid performance covers daily commutes on electric power while delivering sports sedan acceleration when needed

  • Air suspension delivers outstanding ride comfort – The Ultra's adaptive suspension absorbs road imperfections while maintaining composed handling at highway speeds

  • Timeless Scandinavian design – Clean lines and understated styling will age gracefully, avoiding the dated look that trend-chasing designs often develop

  • Comprehensive standard equipment – Features like premium audio, advanced driver assistance, and the panoramic roof come included where competitors charge extra

CONS:


  • Infotainment requires too many menu taps – Basic functions like odometer readings are buried in the interface, and response times lag behind the best German systems

  • Premium pricing approaches $80k optioned – The T8 Ultra's as-tested price positions it against well-equipped German rivals with stronger brand prestige

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The XC60 T8 Ultra proves that restraint can be its own form of luxury. In a segment where everyone is shouting, Volvo built something worth listening to.

 

The luxury compact SUV segment has become an arms race of aggressive styling, oversized grilles, and angular creases that shout for attention. Volvo refuses to participate. The 2026 XC60 T8 AWD Ultra arrives as a deliberate counterpoint, a vehicle that communicates confidence through restraint rather than visual aggression. This is Scandinavian design philosophy made tangible: every surface, every proportion, every material choice serves a purpose beyond mere aesthetics. The result is a plug-in hybrid that feels like a quiet room in a noisy building. Where competitors deploy sharp edges and exaggerated haunches, Volvo deploys calm.

Designer: Volvo

The XC60 occupies an interesting position in automotive design language. It neither chases trends nor ignores them entirely. Instead, it filters contemporary expectations through a distinctly Nordic lens, one that values negative space as much as positive form. The T8 AWD Ultra represents the fullest expression of this philosophy, combining Volvo’s highest specification levels with a powertrain that delivers 455 horsepower while maintaining the ability to commute silently on electric power alone. This duality, performance capability wrapped in visual serenity, defines the vehicle’s character. The tension between these elements creates something more compelling than either would achieve independently.

What makes the XC60 significant from a design perspective extends beyond surface treatment. The vehicle represents a mature interpretation of what luxury means in an era of environmental awareness and digital saturation. Rather than adding complexity, Volvo has systematically removed it.

Exterior Form Language

The XC60’s silhouette reads as a refined two-box shape with short overhangs and an upright tail. This proportion feels deliberately conservative compared to the swooping fastbacks and coupe-like rooflines that dominate the segment. The shoulder line runs cleanly from the Thor’s Hammer headlights to the vertical taillights, creating visual length without dramatic surfacing. Wheels ranging from 20 to 21 inches fill the arches appropriately without overwhelming the body. The overall effect suggests competence rather than performance, substance rather than flash.

Volvo’s signature lighting elements anchor the design. The Thor’s Hammer LED headlights have become as recognizable as BMW’s kidney grilles or Audi’s rings.

The 2026 refresh brings a cleaner grille treatment that echoes the larger XC90, with diagonal bar elements replacing previous iterations. Black internal housings within the headlight assemblies add depth and modernity without requiring additional brightwork. The lower fascia integrates real airflow openings at the corners, avoiding the fake vent epidemic that plagues the segment. Parking sensors and the forward camera system disappear into the design rather than appearing as afterthoughts. The front face communicates premium positioning through execution quality rather than aggressive styling, a distinction that matters as the vehicle ages. Designs that rely on current trends date quickly. Designs that prioritize proportion and finish quality remain relevant longer.

In profile, the XC60 reveals its proportional confidence. The greenhouse maintains a traditional three-box rhythm with proper A, B, and C pillars rather than the floating roof illusions that have become common. Window surrounds in chrome or black depending on specification provide subtle accent without excessive ornamentation. Roof rails sit low and functional. The overall side view could almost be mistaken for a wagon at certain angles, a reference to Volvo’s estate car heritage that feels intentional rather than accidental.

The rear design employs tall, smoked LED taillights that climb the D-pillars in a signature pattern. VOLVO block lettering spans the tailgate cleanly. T8, Recharge, and AWD badging identifies the powertrain without cluttering the surface. A subtle diffuser-style lower bumper treatment with integrated reflectors replaces visible exhaust outlets, acknowledging the plug-in hybrid’s ability to operate without combustion. The paint palette reinforces the design philosophy: Crystal White Metallic, Onyx Black Metallic, Denim Blue, and Vapour Grey. These colors reward close inspection rather than demanding attention from across a parking lot.

Interior Architecture

Opening the door reveals the XC60’s primary design statement. Where the exterior whispers, the interior speaks clearly about Volvo’s priorities. The immediate impression is of a cocoon, a space designed for occupants rather than spectators. Surfaces flow horizontally across the dashboard, creating visual width and calm.

The Ultra trim layers Nappa leather across the seating surfaces with substantial bolstering and careful stitching. Available colorways include Charcoal for those who prefer darker, more enveloping environments and Blond for an airier, more open feel. Both options demonstrate restraint in their application, avoiding the contrasting piping and excessive quilting that some competitors use to signal luxury. Material transitions occur at logical boundaries rather than arbitrary decorative lines. Real open-pore wood, metal mesh, and textured inlays provide tactile variety without visual chaos. The surfaces invite touch rather than discouraging it.

The center console demonstrates Scandinavian minimalism in practice. A portrait-oriented 9-inch touchscreen dominates the interface.

Below it, a small number of physical controls remain for frequently used functions. The volume knob uses a knurled metal finish that rewards tactile interaction. On higher specifications, an Orrefors crystal-style shifter replaces the standard gear selector, introducing a jewelry-like element that catches light without demanding attention. The panoramic moonroof, standard or widely available depending on market, brings natural light into what might otherwise feel cave-like in darker trim configurations. This interplay between enclosed comfort and external connection runs throughout the interior design.

Seating architecture prioritizes long-distance comfort over sports car support. The front seats offer heating, ventilation, and massage functions in Ultra specification, with adjustable lumbar support and thigh extenders for taller occupants. The seats themselves provide substantial cushioning without feeling soft, maintaining shape and support over extended drives. This is furniture designed for hours of use rather than showroom photography. Rear accommodations follow suit with a gently reclined backrest and support that favors two adults comfortably over three-across capacity. The cabin is honest about its size: this is a compact luxury SUV, not a full-size family hauler.

Storage solutions appear throughout the cabin without disrupting the visual calm. A larger-than-previous center console bin holds items out of sight. Cupholders position logically. Door pockets accommodate bottles and smaller items. Bag hooks and nets behind the front seats provide additional organization in some configurations. The cargo area maintains a broad, square opening with practical load floor height. Split-folding rear seats create a flat surface when more capacity is needed. The plug-in hybrid packaging, often a compromise in other vehicles, preserves useful cargo space without major intrusion.

Material Composition

Material selection in the XC60 Ultra reveals Volvo’s understanding of tactile luxury. Soft-touch surfaces cover the dashboard and upper door panels, providing warmth that cold leather cannot. The leather appointments on the seats use proper grain texture rather than the over-processed smoothness that signals synthetic origin. Stitching appears precise and consistent, following design lines rather than merely holding materials together. The contrast between different textures, matte leather, polished metal, open-pore wood, creates visual interest through material honesty rather than applied decoration. Each surface communicates what it is made from without pretense.

Lower cabin areas use plastics that feel dense and well-fitted rather than hollow and cost-reduced. Panel gaps remain tight and consistent throughout.

The metal trim elements, appearing on speaker grilles, door handles, and climate control surrounds, use actual aluminum rather than chrome-look plastic. These details matter because they accumulate into an overall impression of quality that either supports or undermines the purchase price. At this specification level, the details support the price consistently. The XC60 Ultra feels expensive because expensive materials have been used in places where human contact occurs.

Volvo’s approach to material selection extends to environmental considerations without compromising luxury perception. Leather alternatives appear in some configurations using recycled materials and more sustainable processing. Wood trim sources from responsible forestry programs. Metal finishes use processes that reduce environmental impact. These choices remain largely invisible to occupants but align with the brand’s stated values and appeal to buyers who consider lifecycle impact alongside immediate tactile experience.

Technology Integration

The XC60 T8 Ultra runs a Google-based infotainment system that represents Volvo’s commitment to simplicity over complexity. Google Assistant provides voice control. Google Maps handles navigation with traffic-aware routing. The Google ecosystem allows app access without requiring phone mirroring, though wireless Apple CarPlay remains available for those who prefer it. The 9-inch portrait touchscreen displays information clearly with quick response to inputs.

A 12-inch digital instrument cluster ahead of the driver offers configurable views including a large navigation map, trip data, and driver assistance status. Information hierarchy follows logical priorities: speed and essential warnings remain prominent while secondary data occupies peripheral positions. An available head-up display projects key information onto the windshield, reducing the need to look away from the road. The display can read speed limits and traffic signs, overlaying them in the driver’s line of sight. These technologies serve practical purposes rather than existing as specification sheet items. The question Volvo seems to have asked is not “what can we add” but “what should we show.”

Some functions require menu navigation that feels deeper than necessary. Odometer readings and certain vehicle settings live multiple taps into the interface.

Audio options include Harman Kardon and an available Bowers and Wilkins system depending on package and market. The latter delivers clarity and richness that transforms the cabin into a listening environment worth experiencing. The sound system represents genuine acoustic engineering rather than speaker count marketing. For a vehicle designed around calm and comfort, high-quality audio integration aligns with the overall philosophy. Poor sound reproduction would undermine the cabin’s premium character.

The technology package demonstrates appropriate restraint alongside capability. Rather than introducing features that require user adaptation, Volvo has implemented systems that work in expected ways. Climate controls respond logically. Navigation provides sensible routes. The instrument cluster communicates without confusion. This sounds like a low bar, but the automotive industry regularly introduces interfaces that prioritize novelty over usability. The XC60’s technology feels like it was designed by people who actually use cars rather than by teams seeking differentiation through complexity.

Powertrain Character

The T8 plug-in hybrid powertrain pairs a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder with an electric motor on the rear axle and a starter-generator between the engine and 8-speed automatic transmission. Combined output reaches approximately 455 horsepower and 523 pound-feet of torque, according to Volvo’s estimates and independent testing. Acceleration to 60 mph arrives in 4.4 to 4.5 seconds, figures that seem incongruous with the vehicle’s reserved styling. This is substantial performance delivered without visual announcement. The vehicle looks calm and moves quickly when requested.

The 18.8 kWh battery provides electric-only range of approximately 32 to 35 miles. This distance covers typical daily commuting for many drivers, allowing pure electric operation for routine trips.

When the battery depletes, combined efficiency settles around 28 mpg. Hybrid operation achieves approximately 63 MPGe. Multiple drive modes, including Hybrid, Pure/EV, Power, and configurable settings, allow drivers to prioritize electric operation, preserve charge for later use, or access maximum combined output. The powertrain flexibility means the XC60 can behave as a quiet urban electric vehicle or a responsive highway cruiser depending on circumstance and driver preference.

The driving experience prioritizes refinement over excitement. Throttle response feels progressive rather than aggressive. The transmission shifts smoothly in normal operation and responds quickly when more power is demanded. The engine remains quiet unless pushed hard, which the vehicle’s character rarely encourages. With the available air suspension on Ultra trim, ride quality emphasizes comfort over sporting sharpness. Body motions stay controlled without feeling harsh. Road imperfections disappear into the suspension rather than transmitting through the structure. Steering provides adequate feedback for confident placement without sporting precision. The XC60 T8 Ultra drives like it looks: composed, capable, and disinclined toward drama.

Daily Reality

Living with the XC60 T8 Ultra reveals strengths that matter more than specification numbers. The cabin’s noise isolation creates a quiet environment at highway speeds, making conversation easy and audio systems worth using. The seats remain comfortable over extended drives, maintaining support without creating pressure points. Climate controls work effectively, and the available air quality monitoring adds practical value in urban environments where exterior air quality varies.

The air suspension’s height adjustment proves useful beyond ride quality. Raising the vehicle provides additional ground clearance for rough roads or driveway approaches.

Lowering it at highway speeds improves aerodynamics and eases entry in low parking structures. The system operates automatically based on conditions, removing the need for driver intervention in most situations. The 360-degree camera system and parking sensors make placing the vehicle in tight spaces manageable despite dimensions that require awareness. The rearview camera displays clearly and inspires confidence during reversing maneuvers.

Some compromises exist within the daily experience. The infotainment system, while functional, lacks the polish of certain German competitors. Response is good but not instant. The interface is logical but not intuitive. This represents adequate execution rather than impressive achievement. Fuel economy, when operating in hybrid mode after battery depletion, requires more frequent stops than three-row crossovers or smaller luxury SUVs. The premium fuel requirement adds cost over regular-grade alternatives. Pricing for the T8 Ultra specification sits in the low to mid 70,000 dollar range before options, with well-equipped examples approaching 80,000 dollars. This positions the XC60 against mid-specification German rivals with established prestige and strong dealer networks.

The vehicle serves specific needs exceptionally well. Commuters with charging access at home or work can operate primarily on electric power, reducing fuel consumption dramatically. Families who prioritize cabin quality over maximum cargo flexibility will appreciate the material choices and seating comfort. Buyers seeking luxury without visual aggression will find the XC60’s restraint appealing rather than disappointing.

Competitive Context

The XC60 T8 Ultra competes against established German plug-in hybrids and traditional luxury crossovers. The BMW X3, Mercedes-Benz GLC, and Audi Q5 offer similar dimensions with different design philosophies. German competitors typically prioritize sharper styling, sportier dynamics, and more tech-forward cabins.

Volvo’s approach differs fundamentally. Where German brands emphasize cockpit-like driver focus with large screen arrays and aggressive surfacing, the XC60 creates a lounge-like environment that serves passengers equally to drivers. Material quality matches or exceeds German alternatives at similar price points. Design vocabulary speaks a different language entirely, one of restraint rather than assertion. The XC60 often offers a modest EV range advantage over many German plug-in rivals, providing practical benefit for drivers who can charge regularly. The power output, approximately 455 horsepower combined, exceeds most segment rivals while the acceleration times remain competitive with dedicated performance variants.

Value within the segment depends on buyer priorities. The XC60 T8 Ultra includes features that cost extra on some competitors: air suspension, premium audio, advanced driver assistance systems. Buyers who value standard equipment over brand prestige may find the Volvo offers more content for comparable money. Those who prioritize established luxury badge recognition or sportier driving dynamics may prefer the German alternatives. The competitive landscape rewards Volvo for differentiation rather than imitation.

The Design Verdict

The 2026 Volvo XC60 T8 AWD Ultra represents a coherent design philosophy executed with consistency and restraint. Every element, from exterior surfacing to interior materials to powertrain calibration, supports the same message: luxury does not require aggression. The vehicle proves that calm confidence communicates premium positioning as effectively as visual drama. This is design maturity applied to the luxury compact SUV segment, a category that often rewards excess over editing.

For buyers who recognize that vehicles shape daily experience through accumulated small interactions, the XC60 offers compelling value. The material quality supports years of use. The technology serves rather than complicates. The powertrain provides capability without demanding attention. The design will age gracefully rather than dating quickly. These qualities matter because vehicles occupy significant portions of our lives and our attention. The XC60 T8 AWD Ultra creates space for calm within transportation. In a segment defined by competition for visual attention, that restraint becomes its own form of statement. Volvo has built a vehicle that trusts its quality to communicate luxury without requiring volume. The execution justifies that trust.

The post Volvo XC60 T8 AWD Ultra Review: Scandinavian Calm in a Segment That Prefers to Shout first appeared on Yanko Design.

A Facebook test makes link-sharing a paid feature for creators

Creators and publishers have long worried about Meta's ability to throttle links to outside content. Now, the company is testing out a new scheme that effectively puts link-sharing behind a paywall for creators on Facebook.

Under the test, a Meta Verified subscription will determine how many links a creator can share another profile per month. According to a screenshot shared by social meda consultant Matt Navarra, creators in the test recently received a notification from Meta informing them that "certain Facebook profiles without Meta Verified, including yours, will be limited to sharing links in 2 organic posts per month."  

Meta is making link sharing pay to play with a new test.
Meta is making link sharing pay to play with a new test.

A spokesperson for Meta confirmed the test to Engadget. The test is currently affecting an unspecified number of creators and pages using "professional mode" on Facebook. Publishers aren't affected for now. "This is a limited test to understand whether the ability to publish an increased volume of posts with links adds additional value for Meta Verified subscribers," the spokesperson said.

While Meta seems to be trying to downplay the significance of the test, it's a notable shift for the company. Many creators and businesses rely on Facebook and reducing their ability to send traffic to outside websites could be a significant hit. Many creators are already frustrated that the company puts its better customer service features behind the Meta Verified subscription, which starts at $14.99/month. Making link-sharing a premium feature as well would be even more unpopular.

Have a tip for Karissa? You can reach her by email, on X, Bluesky, Threads, or send a message to @karissabe.51 to chat confidentially on Signal.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/a-facebook-test-makes-link-sharing-a-paid-feature-for-creators-224632957.html?src=rss

Astronomers find mysterious lemon-shaped exoplanet with NASA’s Webb telescope

Space is full of unsolved mysteries, and a team using NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope have recently turned up a doozy. "I remember after we got the data down, our collective reaction was 'What the heck is this?' It's extremely different from what we expected," said Peter Gao of the Carnegie Earth and Planets Laboratory in Washington, a co-author on the study.

The researchers found an exoplanet dubbed PSR J2322-2650b that orbits a small, dense star emitting electromagnetic radiation known as a pulsar. They are an example of a black widow system, where a rapidly spinning pulsar is paired with a smaller astronomical body. A black widow duo isn’t unusual, but this pair has sparked questions about how the exoplanet originally formed.

The exoplanet's proximity to the pulsar and its intense gravitational pull have distorted it into an oblong lemon shape. More unusually, PSR J2322-2650b also has a unique atmosphere comprised mostly of helium and carbon. "Instead of finding the normal molecules we expect to see on an exoplanet — like water, methane, and carbon dioxide — we saw molecular carbon," principal investigator Michael Zhang of University of Chicago said. Given its strange atmosphere, the team isn't certain how the exoplanet formed. "It's very hard to imagine how you get this extremely carbon-enriched composition. It seems to rule out every known formation mechanism," Zhang said. For now, we’ll chalk this up as another mystery of the universe.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/science/space/astronomers-find-mysterious-lemon-shaped-exoplanet-with-nasas-webb-telescope-223722244.html?src=rss

TCL’s $199 Projector Puts a 120-Inch Screen in Any Room (And Costs Less Than AirPods Pro)

Home cinema has never been this affordable. The TCL Projector C1 brings 120-inch screen entertainment to your living room for just $199, making it cheaper than the AirPods Pro, which sounds wild considering one’s a tiny pair of earbuds and the other’s an entire cinema in your house. This isn’t a stripped-down compromise either. The projector packs Google TV, automatic focus, and a built-in battery into a portable package.

What makes this pricing remarkable is the complete feature set TCL has managed to include. Most projectors at this price point require external speakers, lack smart TV capabilities, or need constant manual adjustments. The C1 combines all these essentials in one device. You can set it up anywhere in your home, cast content from your phone, and enjoy Dolby Audio without buying additional equipment. For the cost of a mid-range streaming device, you’re getting an entire home theater system.

Designer: TCL

Click Here to Buy Now

TCL just launched their C1 projector in the UK for £249.99, though Americans get a fairly sizeable price slash of $199. I keep staring at that number trying to figure out where the catch is. You can project a 120-inch image for less than a pair of premium wireless earbuds. A full-size screen that dwarfs even the most absurdly large televisions, available for impulse-purchase money. And there isn’t some limited Black Friday offer anywhere – this is the MSRP on the box.

Obviously they cut corners somewhere. The projector outputs 230 ISO lumens, which isn’t the brightest out there by a fair mile. Yes, you can still watch movies and shows just fine, the only real caveat is that you’ll need absolute darkness – simply drawing one curtain in the afternoon won’t cut it, and watching a game with the lights on may prove to be less than satisfactory – but hey, two hundred bucks. Spend a few more on blackout curtains and you’re good. The LCD panel delivers 1080p natively with 4K support, and you need about 2.5 meters of throw distance to hit that 120-inch maximum.

Google TV comes baked in, which matters more than it should. Most cheap projectors force you to plug in a Chromecast or Fire Stick, adding another $50 and another remote to lose between your couch cushions. Netflix certification means proper app support instead of janky workarounds or browser-based streaming that buffers at the worst possible moments. Auto-focus and keystone correction handle the setup pain points that make most people abandon projectors after one frustrating evening. I’ve spent twenty minutes adjusting focus wheels on projectors that cost ten times this much, so having it happen automatically feels like cheating.

TCL included a 60 Wh battery, which gets you through a two-hour movie without trailing extension cords across your living room. Weighing 1.8 kilograms means you can actually carry this thing around from your living room to your bedroom. The integrated adjustable stand folds into the body instead of requiring a separate tripod purchase, and you can even rotate the C1 to face your ceiling for in-bed entertainment. HDMI and USB-A ports cover the basics, Wi-Fi 5 handles streaming without constant buffering, and Bluetooth 5.1 lets you pair actual speakers because that 8-watt built-in option with Dolby Audio support exists purely for emergencies. Nobody’s watching Dune on an 8-watt speaker and pretending they’re satisfied.

Projectors have always occupied this frustrating middle ground where cheap ones are genuinely terrible and good ones cost mortgage payment money. You either bought a $79 pico-projector that barely functioned or dropped $2,000 on something that required a dedicated room and professional calibration. TCL figured out that most people just want to watch movies on a big screen without taking out a loan or earning an engineering degree. The brightness limitations mean this won’t replace your main TV for daytime viewing, but it turns movie nights into actual events instead of just sitting on your couch scrolling through Netflix for forty minutes. Gaming on a 100-inch screen changes how you experience everything from racing games to sprawling RPGs. Your living room becomes the place where people actually want to gather instead of everyone staring at their phones in different corners.

Two hundred dollars removes most of the decision-making anxiety. You can buy this on a whim and if it doesn’t work out, you’re not crying into your pillow about wasted money. Although, considering TCL’s track record, this one might actually work out to be as good as, if not more reliable than, a 50″ smart TV that may cost 4-5x more.

Click Here to Buy Now

The post TCL’s $199 Projector Puts a 120-Inch Screen in Any Room (And Costs Less Than AirPods Pro) first appeared on Yanko Design.

Jared Isaacman is NASA’s new leader

NASA has a leader again. On Wednesday, the US Senate confirmed Jared Isaacman as the agency's administrator, with a 67-30 vote. The billionaire entrepreneur (and Elon Musk ally) will have his hands full navigating political waters while managing a severely downsized workforce.

You might recall that this wasn't Isaacman's first shot at the job. He was nominated to the post earlier this year. But days before he was scheduled for a confirmation vote, President Donald Trump withdrew his nomination.

The reversal reportedly came after the president was told that Isaacman had donated to prominent Democrats. (Trump’s description of his decision, as based on a "thorough review of prior associations," seemed to lend weight to that.) However, that was also around the time the Trump-Musk feud was about to boil over. Regardless, Isaacman was nominated again in November.

The new NASA head reportedly has broad support from the space community. (That makes him something of an aberration among Trump appointees in scientific fields.) "I am optimistic that Mr. Isaacman will bring a steady hand and clear vision to NASA," Sen. Marie Cantwell (D-WA) told The New York Times.

The new administrator has traveled to space twice on private missions. In a document published in May, Isaacman shared his three objectives for NASA. These included human missions to the Moon, Mars and deep space; helping the organization do more with a constrained budget; and cost-cutting through industry and academic partnerships.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/science/space/jared-isaacman-is-nasas-new-leader-220833691.html?src=rss

Billboard’s charts are increasingly weighted towards on-demand streaming, but not enough for YouTube

YouTube announced that it will no longer share data with Billboard for the creation of the Billboard Hot 100 and other charts because the video platform doesn't believe they're calculated fairly. The issue lies, per YouTube, with how Billboard weighs on-demand streams in its rankings: The publication weighs streams from paid music streaming services over ad-supported streams, and YouTube just so happens to run an ad-supported streaming service.

Much like getting a book on The New York Times Bestseller list, landing a spot on the Billboard charts doesn't carry quite the same importance that it once did. When the majority of the media people consume is digital and on-demand, sales numbers aren't a guaranteed indicator of success or popularity. That's part of the reason why Billboard started including digital streams in its calculations way back in 2007, and why it announced plans to adjust how it weighs on-demand streaming just yesterday.

On Tuesday, Billboard announced that it would add more weight to streaming to "better reflect an increase in streaming revenue and changing consumer behaviors." Billboard currently counts an "album consumption unit" as an album sale, which either breaks down to "3,750 ad-supported or 1,250 paid/subscription on-demand official audio and video streams." In the new ranking scheme that will go into effect in January 2026, "each album consumption unit will now equal 2,500 ad-supported or 1,000 paid/subscription on-demand official audio and video streams." 

"The change means that it will take 33.3 percent fewer ad-supported on-demand streams of songs from an album, and 20 percent fewer paid/subscription on-demand streams of songs from an album, to equal an album unit," Billboard says. Put another way, things are moving in YouTube’s favor, just apparently not as quickly as the company wants.

YouTube characterizes pulling its data from Billboard as fighting for fairness and equality, but it's equally connected to the platform’s demonstration of its own power. It already funnels billions of dollars to artists and labels from the money it makes on ads and subscriptions, but it clearly also wants the power to mint new chart-topping stars. “We are committed to achieving equitable representation across the charts and hopefully can work with Billboard to return to theirs,” YouTube says in its announcement. “Until then, if you're curious about what music is making waves on YouTube, you can visit our charts here.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/music/billboards-charts-are-increasingly-weighted-towards-on-demand-streaming-but-not-enough-for-youtube-220238291.html?src=rss

AI-powered headphones for private conversations even in the most crowded places

We’ve come a long way when it comes to noise isolation used in headphones and earbuds. The Active Noise Cancellation technology employed in current-generation audio accessories has reached a level that allows for adaptive ANC levels depending on the ambient noise environment. A handful of brands even go the distance to implement turning on transparency mode automatically when someone is talking to you. That’s a novelty, but still, you’ll hear the voices of other people in the vicinity if you are in a crowded environment.

That could change with an innovation that aims to eliminate any unwanted voices in the conversation. For instance, when you are talking to your pal on the street, you’ll only hear his voice, and all the other voices of people will be muted out. This innovation will not be helpful as a daily driver, but it will assist people with hearing impairments in hearing better. The initial prototype developed by the group of researchers at the University of Washington is known as the proactive hearing assistant,” and it filters the conversation partner’s voice only and looks promising.

Designer: University of Washington

The AI-powered headphones do all the filtering automatically without any manual input which is a potent functionality current-gen headphones can hugely benefit from. The speech isolating technology suppresses the voices that don’t match the pattern of turn-taking conversation. The AI model on board keeps a tab on the timing patterns and filters out anything that doesn’t fit. Application of this exciting tech could not only be limited to audio accessories and hearing aids but also come integrated with wearable tech like smart glasses or VR headsets. The most practical implementation could come in handy at crowded places where you have to really focus on the person in conversation.

According to Senior author Shyam Gollakota, “Our insight is that when we’re conversing with a specific group of people, our speech naturally follows a turn-taking rhythm. And we can train AI to predict and track those rhythms using only audio, without the need for implanting electrodes.” The current prototype supports one wearer and up to four other people which is impressive. More so when you factor in the lag-free overall experience. Currently, the team is testing two different models of the iteration: one that runs a “who spoke when” check to look for any overlap between the speakers, identifying who’s speaking when. The second model cleans the raw signal and then feeds real-time isolated audio to the user. The latter, so far, has scored well with the 11 participants in the study.

Currently, these basic over-ear headphones are loaded with extra microphones, and the team is working on slimming down the size. In conjunction with the research that is going on, small chips are being developed that run these AI models, so that they can be fitted inside hearing aids or earbuds. So, are we ready for a future where intelligent hearing is part of our daily drive?

 

The post AI-powered headphones for private conversations even in the most crowded places first appeared on Yanko Design.

The first post-EA FIFA soccer sim will be a Netflix Games exclusive

FIFA's first true soccer sim after the end of its EA partnership will be available exclusively on Netflix, the streaming service announced. This "reimagined FIFA football simulation game" will be developed and published by Delphi Interactive, and be available to Netflix subscribers next year, right in time for FIFA World Cup 2026.

EA and FIFA maintained a nearly 30 year partnership creating soccer games before they parted ways in 2022. EA continued its soccer series afterward as EA FC, but despite being in talks with "leading game publishers, media companies and investors" about "a major new FIFA simulation football game title for 2024," a FIFA-backed competitor has yet to materialize. Instead, FIFA has mostly supported arcade soccer games in the last few years, like FIFA Rivals from Mythical Games and FIFA Heroes from ENVER.

While the game Delphi Interactive is working on is pitched as a "simulation game," based on what little detail appears in Netflix's announcement, it doesn't sound like it's targeting hardcore soccer fans in the same way EA's games do. Instead, this new FIFA title is designed to be "a game that anyone, anywhere, can pick up and instantly feel the magic of football," according to Delphi Interactive CEO Caspar Daugaard. The game will also be designed to use a smartphone as a controller, possibly limiting how demanding or complicated gameplay can actually be.

This new FIFA game will be Delphi Interactive's second project as a studio after working on IO Interactive's 007 First Light. Backing approachable games that can be controlled with a smartphone is part of a new approach Netflix has taken with its interactive titles in 2025. The company has either cancelled or handed off its more ambitious game projects and studios, and zeroed in on party games and adaptations as its main focus.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/the-first-post-ea-fifa-soccer-sim-will-be-a-netflix-games-exclusive-204321196.html?src=rss

Study links Amazon’s algorithmic pricing with erratic, inflated costs for school districts

When it comes to convenience, it’s hard to beat Amazon. And that rationale isn’t limited to consumers: Many local districts shopping for supplies with public funds apply the same logic. But the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) published a study earlier this month (via The American Prospect) that illustrates the cost of that bargain. It suggests that Amazon’s “dynamic pricing” has led many schools and other localities to overpay for supplies.

Public schools and local governments have historically bought supplies by soliciting competitive bids from local suppliers. Those vendors then respond with fixed price lists, delivery timelines and other terms. This competition — all out in the open, part of the public record — encourages low prices and transparency.

On the surface, ordering from Amazon appears to offer competition, too. After all, the platform includes third-party vendors fighting for your dollars. But turning taxpayer funds over to Amazon’s algorithms isn’t quite that simple. That’s because the platform’s “dynamic pricing” (algorithmically driven real-time changes) is inherently opaque.

According to the report, Amazon’s contracts with public entities don’t include fixed price lists. Instead, they include language built around swings. “This contract has a dynamic pricing structure in which the price for items listed on the online digital marketplace is driven by the market,” Amazon’s contract with Utah reads. “This contract will not need to be amended when prices fluctuate.”

Below are some examples of wild price discrepancies for these districts. All of ILSR’s examples are from localities buying supplies from Amazon Business with public funds in 2023.

  • A City of Boulder, CO employee ordered a 12-pack of Sharpie markers from Amazon Business for $8.99. On the same day, a Denver Public Schools worker ordered the same markers for $28.63.

  • Amazon charged Clark County, WA, $146,000 for 610 computer monitors. On another day, that same order would have cost $24,000 less.

  • Pittsburgh Schools bought two cases of Kleenex for $57.99 each. On the same day, Denver Schools paid $36.91 for a single case.

  • On a single August day, Denver Schools placed two separate orders for bulk cases of dry-erase markers. One cost $114.52. The other was $149.07.

  • In March 2023, Denver Schools paid $15.39 for a Swingline stapler (sold by Amazon). A few days later, the same school system paid $61.87 for the same product (sold by a third-party seller).

Even in that last example, ILSR says Amazon’s algorithms are the culprit. “It might be tempting to blame the seller for putting a $62 price tag on a stapler or the employee for not noticing the cost,” the nonprofit argues. “But that overlooks Amazon’s pivotal role in the transaction — and the profit it makes. Amazon’s algorithms steer shoppers’ attention, selecting featured products and organizing search results. The platform routinely prompts users to ‘buy it again,’ even when the price has jumped. For busy public school employees, it’s all too easy to simply click the buy button, under the assumption that Amazon is surfacing the best option.”

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA - DECEMBER 3: Amazon CEO Andy Jassy speaks during a keynote address at AWS re:Invent 2024, a conference hosted by Amazon Web Services, at The Venetian Las Vegas on December 3, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services)
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy
Noah Berger via Getty Images

One portion of the study looked at repeat orders for 2,500 “high-frequency items.” (These included Amazon-brand copy paper, Elmer’s glue, BIC pens, Lysol cleaning wipes and Crayola crayons.) In total, the jurisdictions in the study spent $3 million on those items. But based on the lowest prices Amazon charged during that period, they would have paid only $2.5 million. Across those same items, one school district could have saved 17 percent (about $1 million) if it consistently received Amazon’s lowest prices.

What would fair market value have been for those items? Well, it’s hard to say because the algorithms are steering pricing silently in the background. A more thorough study that included the same items, bought exclusively through the traditional procurement method, would tell us much more. And recent history has taught us that trusting Big Tech’s algorithms to serve the public good (rather than its own bottom line) is a fool’s errand.

In at least some cases, the practice routes public funds away from local vendors and toward overseas ones — and, of course, Amazon itself. In Berkeley County, WV, the school district spent $1.3 million on Amazon Business in 2023. What portion went to sellers in the state? A measly $142.

On top of all of that, the practice has snuffed out many of the smaller vendors that traditionally competed for these contracts. “The disappearance of these small and mid-sized businesses weakens local economies and tax bases,” the report concludes. “And it leaves governments increasingly dependent on Amazon, paving the way for the kind of monopoly control that ensures higher prices, poorer service, and less innovation.”

In a statement sent to The Guardian, Amazon disputed the study’s conclusions. “Pricing research is notoriously difficult to conduct accurately and typically lacks reliable methodology, including cherry-picked product selections, mismatched product comparisons and comparing in-stock items with products out-of-stock at competitors,”

ILSR’s report drew in spending data from 128 local governments (including cities, counties and school districts) and 122 state agencies. It also gathered contract documents and interviewed public officials, procurement experts and vendors.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/study-links-amazons-algorithmic-pricing-with-erratic-inflated-costs-for-school-districts-202047988.html?src=rss

Remember Apple’s AirPower Mat? Dreame Built A MagSafe Power Bank That Does The Same Thing

Dreame built its name on robot vacuums and smart cleaning stations, but its newest release does not clean your floors at all. Dreame’s Air Power 17 arrives as a magnetic portable power bank with a surprisingly polished feel, pairing an aluminum frame with AG glass and a footprint barely larger than a bank card. It clicks into place on an iPhone 17 or any Qi2 compatible phone, then quietly delivers up to 15 watts wirelessly or 20 watts over USB-C. But that’s not what’s so surprising about the power bank (apart from the fact that the parent company also manufactures robot vacuums)… it’s that the AirPower 17 also charges your TWS earbuds AS WELL AS your Apple Watch, right through the same wireless charging surface.

The name is a clever dig at Apple’s own AirPower disaster from 2017, when the company announced a charging mat that could handle 3 devices at once. Now, it seems like Dreame’s taken the mantle of making that happen, that too in a compact form factor that still feels decidedly premium, thanks to the slim design, the aluminum alloy frame, and AG glass back. Now, the obvious question is why a vacuum company thinks it can waltz into a market already flooded with Anker, Baseus, and a hundred Shenzhen generics. Here’s the thing: Dreame has been on an absolute tear since July, dropping or teasing products in personal care, large appliances, consumer electronics, and even automotive adjacent gear. This power bank feels like part of a coordinated land grab, and the clever multipurpose design genuinely feels like a consumer-focused product aimed at winning hearts, not just adding small numbers to a company’s profits.

Designer: Dreame

The Air Power 17’s design is fairly simple and straightforward, packing one USB C port, Qi2 wireless at 15 watts max, and that integrated kickstand. The 5,000 milliamp hour version comes in at just 8 millimeters thick and 125 grams, which is borderline remarkable when you consider it includes a stand mechanism and a full magnetic ring. The 10,000 milliamp hour Pro is predictably chunkier at 12.8 millimeters and 189 grams, but still compact enough that you could daily carry it without hating your life. Both share the exact same 103 by 58.4 millimeter footprint, so your choice really comes down to whether you value slimness or capacity more.

The winning feature, however, is the power bank’s ability to charge both smartphones as well as an Apple Watch from the same charging surface. Snap the Air Power 17 to the back of your phone, or just place it on a surface and rest your Apple Watch on the watch symbol and you’re good to go. Right below the Watch symbol is also a TWS earbud case symbol, which means you can even charge your AirPods or other earbuds on the power bank. I’ve yet to see a single power bank this slim so elegantly cover all bases. The fact that a robot vacuum company pushed this first seems odd but hey, the consumer in me is happy he doesn’t need dongles, cables, and other paraphernalia to keep his devices charged.

The built in stand is the sneaky detail that turns the power bank into a proper desk accessory, the kind of thing you slap your phone onto during a video call or while following a recipe. Most magnetic power banks treat the stand as an afterthought, a flimsy plastic hinge that wobbles under the weight of a phone. Dreame integrated it into the rear housing with their branding stamped right on it, so it doubles as brand presence and functional hardware. Wireless efficiency is rated above 60 percent, which tracks with Qi2 standards but also means you lose about 40 percent of capacity to heat and conversion losses when charging wirelessly. If you want the full 10,000 milliamp hours, you need to cable up.

The catch is availability. Right now this lives exclusively in China, sold on platforms like JD.com with zero confirmed timeline for a global rollout. Dreame already sells robot vacuums in the US and Europe, so the infrastructure exists, but consumer electronics accessories face different certification hoops than home appliances. At 219 yuan for the 5,000 milliamp hour model and 259 yuan for the 10,000 milliamp hour Pro, Dreame is pricing aggressively enough to make established brands nervous while keeping enough margin to signal this is a real product line. Here’s to hoping for a global rollout soon – maybe this is the AirPower Mat we truly deserve!

The post Remember Apple’s AirPower Mat? Dreame Built A MagSafe Power Bank That Does The Same Thing first appeared on Yanko Design.