Infinix NOTE Edge Review: Visible Luxury

PROS:


  • Distinctive material finishes feel intentional, tactile, and far removed from generic glass phones.

  • Curved AMOLED display integrates seamlessly into the frame with excellent visual balance.

  • Slim profile paired with large battery delivers comfort without sacrificing endurance.

  • Weight distribution feels centered, stable, and comfortable during long daily use.

  • Design language prioritizes subtle luxury over flashy, trend-driven aesthetics.

CONS:


  • Performance prioritizes consistency over raw power for demanding mobile gaming.

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

A design-led smartphone where materials, texture, and restraint create a genuinely premium visual identity.
award-icon

The Infinix NOTE Edge doesn’t announce itself through volume. It doesn’t rely on aggressive angles or oversaturated finishes to command attention. Instead, it arrives with a quieter confidence, the kind that reveals itself slowly as light shifts across its surface and the hand adjusts to its form.

I’ve spent time with devices that prioritize specification lists over tactile experience, and the NOTE Edge represents a deliberate departure from that approach. Infinix has made choices here that suggest an understanding of what makes an object feel considered rather than merely assembled. The 7.2mm profile isn’t thin for the sake of a number on a spec sheet. It’s thin because that dimension allows the curved display to flow into the frame without creating awkward transitions or compromising grip. The fact that a 6,500mAh battery fits inside without adding bulk says something about the internal engineering priorities.

What interests me most about this device isn’t any single feature. It’s how Infinix has leaned into a specific material language, treating the phone less like a piece of consumer electronics and more like a fashion object, with finishes that reference gemstones, textiles, and luxury accessories rather than the gradient glass that dominates this category. The NOTE Edge wants to be noticed, but it doesn’t want to shout. That tension between presence and subtlety defines the entire experience.

Design and Ergonomics

The Silk Green finish on our review unit operates differently than most smartphone surfaces. It’s a leather-like treatment with a texture evocative of luxury handbags, absorbing light rather than bouncing it back indiscriminately. Indoors, the color reads as deep and muted, almost forest-like in its saturation. Move outside, and the green opens up, revealing warmer undertones that shift depending on the angle of observation. This isn’t a static color. It’s a material that responds to its environment, and that responsiveness gives the phone a character that glass-backed devices simply can’t replicate.

The texture matters as much as the color. There’s no cold shock when you pick it up from a table. Fingerprints don’t accumulate the way they do on glossy surfaces. After extended use, the back panel still looks intentional rather than smudged.

Infinix offers alternative finishes that pursue a different aesthetic entirely. The Lunar Titanium, Stellar Blue, and Shadow Black variants use a cat-eye stone inspired treatment that creates visible movement as the phone tilts. Light doesn’t just reflect from these surfaces. It travels across them, producing shifting patterns that never quite settle into a fixed appearance. The finish has enough grip to feel secure without becoming tacky, and it maintains that feel whether your hands are dry or slightly damp. The effect is dramatic without crossing into garish territory, and it demonstrates that Infinix isn’t limiting itself to a single design vocabulary.

The 3D curved 1.5K AMOLED display integrates with the frame through a transition that eliminates the hard edge found on flat-screen devices. The curve is calibrated to reduce perceived width while maintaining usability across the entire display surface. Ultra-narrow bezels, with the bottom edge measuring just 1.87mm at its narrowest point, push content closer to the physical boundary of the device. The 6.78-inch panel feels immersive without forcing the body to expand beyond comfortable one-handed reach. A 120Hz refresh rate keeps motion smooth, 10-bit color depth renders gradients without visible banding, and 4500 nits of peak brightness means outdoor visibility doesn’t require cupped hands or squinting. Gamers benefit from a 2800Hz instant touch sampling rate that registers inputs faster than most users can perceive.

The interaction layer adds functional touches without cluttering the physical design. A dedicated One-Tap button on the frame provides customizable shortcuts to features like the flashlight, camera, or FOLAX AI assistant. The Active Halo Lighting around the rear camera module glows softly in response to notifications, calls, and charging status, with adjustable colors and stepless dimming. Neither element demands attention, but both reward users who engage with them. An integrated IR blaster lets you control TVs, air conditioners, and other appliances directly from the phone. eSIM support, a first for Infinix devices, adds flexibility for travelers and dual-SIM users who’d rather not swap physical cards. Availability varies by region and model, so check the official Infinix website to confirm eSIM support in your market.

Weight distribution deserves specific attention. A 6,500mAh battery creates density that could easily pull the phone off balance, making it feel top-heavy during vertical use or awkward during extended sessions. The NOTE Edge avoids this entirely, with mass centered in the chassis so scrolling, typing, and camera work all feel stable.

The glass-to-frame transition reinforces that sense of cohesion. There’s no lip or ridge where materials meet. Your grip flows uninterrupted around the device, which matters more than it might seem during the first few minutes of handling. Over hours, that seamlessness translates to reduced fatigue. The phone disappears physically while remaining visually present, which is exactly the balance a design-forward device should achieve. Corning Gorilla Glass 7i protects the curved display surface, and IP65 dust and water resistance means the materials can handle exposure to the elements without requiring constant caution.

Software and User Experience (XOS 16)

XOS 16 plays a bigger role in how the NOTE Edge feels than you might expect. Built on Android 16, the interface doesn’t compete with the hardware for attention. It supports it. Transitions stay smooth, layouts feel intentional, and nothing about the experience pulls focus away from what you’re actually doing on the phone.

The Glow Space design language shows up in subtle ways rather than obvious visual tricks. Depth effects, layered wallpapers, and motion cues work especially well with the curved display, giving the interface a sense of dimension without becoming distracting. It pairs naturally with the phone’s physical form, which matters when you’re swiping one handed or shifting between apps quickly. After a few hours, the software fades into the background, which is exactly what good interface design should do.

Haptics feel restrained and precise. Taps register cleanly. Gestures feel confident without being exaggerated. There’s enough feedback to reinforce interaction, but not so much that it becomes noise. Combined with the curved edges and balanced weight, the software contributes directly to how comfortable the device feels over long sessions.

Infinix’s AI layer works best when it stays quiet. System level optimization, background task management, and two-way AI noise reduction operate without demanding attention. The noise cancellation works in both directions, cleaning up background sound on your end while also filtering what you hear from callers. That restraint fits the overall tone of the NOTE Edge.

Longevity is where XOS 16 quietly strengthens the value of the device. Infinix commits to three years of OS updates and five years of security patches, which changes how you think about living with the phone long term. This isn’t software designed to feel fresh for a few months and then age out. It’s built to remain stable, secure, and familiar well beyond the initial ownership window.

Performance and Camera

The MediaTek Dimensity 7100 5G handles daily use without calling attention to itself. Swiping, launching apps, and unlocking all register instantly. It’s the kind of platform that does its job and stays out of the way.

That consistency holds over longer sessions. I kept messaging, maps, and media apps running simultaneously and never felt the system hesitate or dump background processes. The interface stayed responsive after hours of mixed use, which matters more than benchmark numbers when you’re navigating an unfamiliar city or bouncing between work threads and personal messages. Heat management impressed me more than raw speed. Extended navigation, casual gaming, and heavy browsing didn’t produce the kind of warmth that makes you shift your grip or set the phone down. The chassis stayed comfortable against my palm throughout full afternoon sessions. Infinix clearly tuned this device for sustained operation rather than brief bursts of peak performance.

Signal stability reinforces that dependability. Infinix’s UPS 3.0 Super Signal Technology focuses on low-frequency cellular bands, the 615 to 960 MHz range that travels farther and penetrates obstacles better than higher frequencies. These are the signals that actually reach you in elevators, underground parking garages, and concrete-heavy buildings when everything else drops off.

The engineering behind it involves physically larger antenna components. Infinix increased the radiation arm area of the main low-frequency antenna by 50 percent and the auxiliary antenna’s radiation wall by 30 percent. That translates to a 1.5 to 2 dB gain in low-frequency reception, which sounds modest on paper but shows up clearly in practice. Calls held steady in places where I normally expect a brief dropout. Data kept flowing in basement-level parking where other phones tend to stall while searching for signal.

It’s the kind of reliability you only notice when it’s missing.

The camera follows that same practical mindset. It’s built to produce usable results without demanding expertise.

This is a dual camera setup. The 50MP main sensor handles all meaningful imaging work, while the secondary lens exists for depth separation in portrait shots.

The 50MP main sensor handles everyday situations with consistent color accuracy from shot to shot. Outdoor images retain detail without oversaturating, and indoor shots keep skin tones natural under mixed lighting. Low light performance benefits from Infinix’s AI RAW imaging algorithm, which lifts shadow detail without flattening contrast or blowing highlights. Texture stays intact where other processing tends to smooth everything into mush. You don’t need to fight the camera or babysit settings. Point, shoot, and move on works more often than not.

Live Photo Mode captures a three-second window around each shutter press, giving you motion instead of a single frozen frame. It’s useful for candid moments, pets, or scenes where timing matters. Exporting as GIFs, setting captures as live wallpapers, or sharing to iPhones via NFC makes the feature feel integrated rather than bolted on. The implementation suggests Infinix thought about how people actually use these clips rather than just checking a feature box.

Video recording stays predictable and clean. Footage looks solid in good light, motion doesn’t introduce distracting jitter, and audio capture handles casual recording without issues. Nothing here feels experimental or unfinished.

Audio and Sound Performance

Sound is handled by a dual stereo speaker system co-engineered with JBL, and it’s immediately noticeable once you stop defaulting to headphones. Volume comes up without harshness, and the tonal balance stays intact even when you push it higher than you normally would for casual listening. There’s actual separation here, with dialogue staying forward in videos and podcasts while music doesn’t collapse into a single flat plane.

Infinix leans on a five-magnet acoustic system and a high-elasticity silicone rubber diaphragm, which sounds technical until you use it. Bass has presence without rattling, mids stay clean, and highs don’t spike in a way that fatigues your ears over longer sessions. The diaphragm flexibility contributes to that balanced output, absorbing vibrations that would otherwise muddy the low end. The 360-degree symmetrical sound field matters more than I expected, especially when you’re watching something without holding the phone perfectly straight. Audio stays consistent whether the phone is resting on a table, propped up, or held casually in one hand. That positional flexibility makes the speakers feel genuinely usable rather than an afterthought.

Sustainability and Longevity

Battery capacity tells only part of the endurance story. The 6,500mAh cell in our review unit (6,150mAh in certain regional configurations) provides multi-day operational potential under moderate use patterns. This isn’t about chasing screen-on time records. It’s about eliminating the anxiety that comes with uncertainty around whether a device will last through an unpredictable day.

In practice, that translates to roughly 22 hours of continuous video playback or 26 hours of outdoor navigation before you need to reach for a cable. When you do need to refuel, 45W All-Round FastCharge gets you to 50% in about 27 minutes and a full charge in just over an hour. Bypass Charging routes power directly to the system board during gaming or navigation, which keeps the battery out of the thermal loop and reduces heat buildup during extended plugged-in sessions.

Long-term battery health becomes relevant when capacity numbers reach this scale. Infinix claims the battery retains more than 80% capacity after 2,000 full charge cycles, equivalent to over six years of typical daily use. The company also cites self-healing technology that repairs micro-damage through dynamic recrystallization during low-current recovery. These aren’t marketing abstractions. They’re engineering claims with testable outcomes, and they suggest the multi-day endurance you experience initially should hold over the ownership cycle rather than eroding within the first year. The durability framing extends beyond just the battery. Material choices across the device suggest consideration for how surfaces age, how components withstand repeated stress, and how the phone maintains its character over months rather than weeks.

XOS 16, built on Android 16, runs the software side. Infinix commits to three years of OS updates and five years of security patches, which represents the longest support window the NOTE series has offered. That commitment matters for a device positioned around longevity.

Value

The NOTE Edge occupies a market position that doesn’t get enough attention. It’s a design-forward midrange device, which means it competes on material quality and user experience rather than processor benchmarks or camera sensor counts. For users who prioritize how a phone looks and feels over how it performs in synthetic tests, the value proposition here is substantial.

What you receive for the price includes premium-feeling materials, balanced ergonomics, multi-day battery endurance, and a display that rivals more expensive devices in clarity and immersion. The Dimensity 7100 5G provides capable daily performance without generating the heat or power consumption of flagships processors. The camera handles real-world scenarios reliably. None of these elements represents a compromise.

The fashion-led color palette means the NOTE Edge appeals to users who want their technology to reflect personal aesthetic preferences. This isn’t a device that disappears into generic smartphone uniformity. It makes a statement.

Wrap Up

The Infinix NOTE Edge succeeds because it understands what it’s trying to be. It’s a considered object that prioritizes material quality, ergonomic refinement, and visual identity over the metrics that dominate most smartphone conversations.

The Silk Green finish exemplifies the approach. It’s a material choice that affects how the phone looks, how it feels, how it ages, and how it responds to its environment. Nothing about it exists in isolation. Every decision connects to a broader vision of what a design-forward smartphone should offer. That coherence is rare, and it’s what separates the NOTE Edge from devices that feel like committees designed them.

For users who’ve grown tired of phones that feel like interchangeable glass rectangles, the NOTE Edge represents an alternative worth serious consideration. Infinix has demonstrated that visible luxury and practical usability can coexist in the midrange segment. The result is a device that you’ll want to use, want to look at, and want to keep using long after the initial appeal of any new purchase typically fades.

The post Infinix NOTE Edge Review: Visible Luxury first appeared on Yanko Design.

Huawei Mate X7 Review: When a Foldable Finally Feels Finished

PROS:


  • Exceptionally thin foldable design that feels resolved and comfortable daily

  • Matched dual displays deliver consistent quality folded or unfolded

  • Camera system prioritizes realism, balance, and dependable everyday results

  • Strong battery life with fast wired and genuinely usable wireless charging

  • Thoughtful ergonomics make it feel like a phone first, foldable second

CONS:


  • HarmonyOS requires ecosystem flexibility and willingness to adjust workflows

  • Telephoto zoom range favors balance over extreme long distance reach

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

A foldable that finally disappears into daily life instead of demanding attention.
award-icon

The best foldables are the ones that stop asking for permission. After years of watching the form factor fight against itself, the Mate X7 arrives as something quieter: a device where restraint replaces spectacle, and compromise fades into the background. What makes it notable isn’t ambition. It’s resolution. The proportions feel considered. The materials feel deliberate. The hinge feels invisible in the way all good engineering eventually should. This is not a phone that announces itself as a foldable. It simply behaves like a flagship that opens when you need more space.

What makes the Mate X7 feel distinct is not how much it can do, but how deliberately its form has been resolved. From the first day, the Mate X7 felt less like a concept I needed to accommodate and more like a tool that quietly folded itself into my routine. That’s a subtle distinction, but it’s the one that matters most. This isn’t about novelty anymore. It’s about maturity.

Design and Ergonomics

Folded, the Mate X7 feels surprisingly ordinary in the best way possible. The thickness stays under ten millimeters, which means it slips into pockets without that familiar resistance most book style foldables still have. Unfolded, it measures approximately 4.5 millimeters. Both displays run at 2.4K resolution on LTPO OLED panels with adaptive refresh from 1 to 120 Hz, the outer screen peaking at 3,000 nits and the inner at 2,500 nits. The curved edges soften the contact points in your hand, and the weight feels evenly distributed rather than top heavy. I never found myself adjusting my grip to compensate for the hinge or camera module.

The black vegan leather rear panel changes how the phone sits in the hand. It’s softer than glass, warmer than metal, and far less prone to slipping during one handed use. Fingerprints don’t cling to it the way they would on a glossy surface. Over time, the leather develops a subtle patina rather than showing wear, which frames aging as character rather than damage. It feels like a material choice made for daily comfort, not display.

The redesigned camera module warrants more attention than it usually gets in foldable reviews because it does more than house optics. This shift away from the circular camera island feels less like a styling decision and more like a correction to how foldables have been carrying visual mass. The Time Space Portal design stretches vertically, which aligns with the natural proportions of a folded device instead of fighting them. It also spreads mass along the back rather than concentrating it near the top, which helps explain why the Mate X7 never feels top heavy in the hand. This design only works because Huawei re-engineered the camera system to fit within the physical constraints of a thinner foldable body, allowing it to read as a surface element rather than a mechanical bulge. What you end up with is a camera module that feels integrated into the body instead of attached to it. Paired with the leather rear panel, the camera module reads less like a hardware interruption and more like part of a continuous material composition.

The interface plays a quiet but important role in how the Mate X7 feels to live with. When the phone is folded, core interactions stay comfortably within thumb reach instead of drifting upward or outward. Unfolding the device doesn’t feel like switching modes so much as expanding the same workspace. Apps reflow predictably rather than rearranging themselves in ways that break muscle memory. That predictability matters because it reinforces the physical design choices. You unfold when you want more space, not because the interface forces you to. The software respects the hardware’s proportions, which is why the Mate X7 feels cohesive rather than clever.

Unfolded, the eight inch inner display changes posture more than behavior. You don’t suddenly use the phone differently. You simply see more of what you were already doing. Email triage feels less cramped. Reading long articles feels natural instead of compressed. The crease fades into the background quickly, and because both displays share the same resolution class, refresh rate range, and color tuning, the transition between folded and unfolded never feels like a downgrade or upgrade. It feels consistent.

That consistency is what makes the design work. The Mate X7 doesn’t force you to choose between screens. It lets you forget about the distinction.

Hinge and Durability

Foldables still live or die by trust. The Mate X7 builds that trust quietly. The hinge opens with steady resistance and closes with a controlled final movement. There’s no snap. No wobble. No audible feedback that makes you hesitate. After days of frequent folding and unfolding, it never felt looser or stiffer than it did out of the box.

Knowing there is a layered structure under the inner display changes how you interact with it. You stop hovering your fingers. You stop being overly careful. The screen responds like a screen, not like something you’re afraid to touch. That psychological shift is important, and it’s something many foldables still fail to achieve.

Water resistance doesn’t turn this into a rugged phone, but it removes anxiety from daily life. Light rain, splashes near a sink, condensation from a cold bottle. These moments no longer feel like threats. You don’t think about them. You keep using the phone.

Performance and Thermal Behavior

The Mate X7 uses a Huawei-designed chipset paired with an updated internal cooling system built specifically for the thermal constraints of a foldable chassis. Rather than emphasizing raw performance numbers, the focus here is sustained responsiveness and thermal stability during extended use. That design intent shows up immediately in daily operation.

Performance on the Mate X7 never called attention to itself, which is exactly what I want from a device in this category. Swiping, scrolling, and switching between apps felt effortless. I never found myself waiting for a transition or wondering if the system would keep up. Rather than chasing benchmark headlines, the platform here prioritizes consistency, keeping animations fluid, app launches quick, and daily use free from friction or compromise.

It’s clear that HarmonyOS isn’t just running on this hardware. It’s tuned for it. The software and silicon work together in a way that feels quiet rather than flashy. Menus respond the moment you touch them. Transitions between folded and unfolded states don’t stutter. High refresh rates stay smooth without feeling like the system is straining to maintain them. That kind of optimization is easy to overlook until you use a device where it’s missing.

When I put the Mate X7 through longer stretches of use, the thermal behavior became the real story. Video calls, heavy browsing, photography, and frequent multitasking ran together without noticeable heat buildup. The vapor chamber cooling system does its work invisibly. The phone stayed comfortable in my hand even during more demanding sessions, and I never found myself shifting my grip to avoid a warm spot. That matters more on a foldable because heat has fewer places to go. The Mate X7 handles that constraint well.

The result is a device that feels steady rather than startling. Performance here isn’t about peak numbers. It’s about consistency across hours of use, which is exactly what allows a foldable to function as a primary phone instead of something you second-guess.

Battery Life and Charging

The Mate X7 carries a 5,300 mAh silicon anode battery, with 66 W wired charging and 50 W wireless. In practice, that capacity translates to a full day of mixed use with time split between the outer and inner displays without feeling like a gamble. Even on heavier days, I wasn’t watching the percentage with concern by evening.

Charging reinforces that confidence. Wired charging is fast enough that short top ups meaningfully extend the day. Wireless charging is practical rather than symbolic. Together, they change how you plan your usage. You stop budgeting power. You start trusting the device to keep up.

That confidence is what allows a foldable to function as a primary phone instead of something you plan around.

Camera Experience

The camera system consists of a 50 megapixel main sensor with a variable physical aperture that opens to f/1.49, a 50 megapixel telephoto with 3.5x optical zoom housed in a vertical periscope structure, and a 40 megapixel ultrawide at f/2.2. Video captures at 4K.

The camera on the Mate X7 doesn’t ask you to think about it. You raise the phone, frame the shot, and trust the result. That trust builds quickly because the camera behaves the same way whether you’re indoors, outdoors, or somewhere in between. It doesn’t surprise you. It doesn’t overprocess. It just works, and that consistency is what allows photography to feel like a natural extension of using the phone rather than a separate task you have to manage.

The 50 megapixel main sensor handles light with a kind of patience you notice over time. In bright conditions, it holds back instead of pushing saturation or sharpening edges artificially. In low light, the variable physical aperture opens wider, which means the sensor gathers more light without relying entirely on software to compensate. The result is images that retain structure in shadows and control in highlights. Colors stay grounded. Skin tones stay believable. The camera doesn’t chase drama. It preserves what’s actually there.

The 50 megapixel telephoto uses a vertical periscope design, which is what allows it to exist inside a body this thin. At 3.5x optical zoom, the range feels deliberately restrained. It’s not trying to reach the moon. It’s trying to be useful at the distances where you actually want more detail. In practice, details hold together. Color stays consistent with the main sensor. Macro capability follows the same logic. You move closer and the lens responds without hunting or losing sharpness. It feels considered, not novelty driven.

Video capture at 4K benefits from the same restraint. The processing pipeline stays out of the way. High contrast scenes remain readable. Motion stays controlled without aggressive smoothing. Skin tones don’t drift toward artificial warmth or coolness. HDR processing handles mixed lighting without making the image feel overworked. The result is footage that looks balanced, not corrected. You notice this most when reviewing clips later. They look like what you saw, not like what the software decided you should see.

What ties all of this together is the vertical camera module. Because Huawei engineered the optics to fit a constrained space, the camera system doesn’t dominate the device. It doesn’t create a top heavy grip. It doesn’t force a thicker body. Instead, it sits inside the form as a functional element rather than a visual statement. That’s what allows the Mate X7 to feel like a phone that happens to take excellent photos, rather than a camera that happens to fold.

Software and Daily Use

The Mate X7 runs HarmonyOS, optimized specifically for foldable layout behavior and dual display continuity. Transitions between folded and unfolded states happen without disruption. Apps reflow logically. Multitasking feels natural rather than forced.

The absence of Google services remains a practical consideration, but it’s no longer the hard stop it once was for many users. Workarounds exist, and in daily use, most essentials are accessible. Whether that trade off is acceptable depends on your ecosystem priorities, but it no longer overshadows the hardware itself.

Sustainability and Longevity

Sustainability on the Mate X7 is less about messaging and more about what happens when a device is designed to survive years of repetition. A device that lasts longer is inherently more responsible. The Mate X7 feels built to survive years of daily use rather than a single upgrade cycle, largely because it avoids unnecessary complexity. Materials are chosen for strength. The hinge is engineered for repetition. The screens are designed to be used, not protected from the user.

That longevity changes the ownership equation. This doesn’t feel like a phone you replace quickly. It feels like one you settle into.

Value and Perspective

The Mate X7 sits firmly in premium territory, but its value comes from reduction rather than addition. Fewer compromises. Fewer warnings. Fewer behavioral adjustments. You’re not paying for spectacle. You’re paying for cohesion.

It feels less like a statement piece and more like a refined tool. For users willing to step outside familiar software ecosystems, the hardware experience justifies that decision.

Considerations

Living with the Mate X7 asks you to be intentional about your software habits. HarmonyOS is capable and well optimized for this hardware, but it operates outside the ecosystems most people have built their workflows around. That requires awareness, not compromise. Whether it fits depends on how tied you are to specific services and how willing you are to adjust.

This is not a device chasing peak numbers. The performance tuning here prioritizes stability over raw output, and that balance holds up well in daily use. In sustained, heavy scenarios, the ceiling does become visible, but it rarely surfaces during normal workflows. For users who push hardware constantly, it is worth understanding upfront. For everyone else, the experience remains smooth and dependable.

The 3.5x optical zoom is a deliberate choice, not a limitation hidden by marketing. It exists because a longer reach would have required a thicker body or a heavier module. If long range photography defines how you shoot, this restraint matters. If it doesn’t, the telephoto performs exactly as it should.

This is still a foldable. The engineering has matured, the materials have improved, and the confidence I felt using it was real. But a device that folds will always ask for a different kind of respect than one that doesn’t. This invites normal use, not careless use.

Final Thoughts

Living with the Huawei Mate X7 feels less like adapting to the future and more like finally arriving there. The device doesn’t ask for patience. It doesn’t demand care. It doesn’t rely on novelty to justify itself. It works.

That may be the most meaningful evolution in foldable design so far. It earns trust by disappearing into daily life and only reminding you it’s special when you need more space, more light, or more time.

That’s what a finished product feels like. In that sense, the Mate X7 feels less like the next foldable and more like the first one that understands what it’s supposed to be.

The post Huawei Mate X7 Review: When a Foldable Finally Feels Finished first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Flashback ONE35 V2 Turns Limitation Into Its Most Compelling Feature

Digital photography has spent three decades eliminating friction, yet the Flashback ONE35 V2 deliberately reintroduces it. This compact camera restricts shooters to 27 exposures per roll and can withhold images for 24 hours before revealing them, treating scarcity and anticipation as design features rather than technical shortcomings. The approach feels counterintuitive until you recognize what it actually targets: not the act of taking pictures, but the behavioral patterns that infinite storage and instant preview have normalized.

Flashback, the Australian startup behind the ONE35, positions the device as “film feeling, digital freedom,” a phrase that captures the central tension the product navigates. The camera doesn’t simulate film chemistry or grain patterns. Instead, it borrows the behavioral scaffolding of disposable cameras, the fixed exposure count, the inability to review shots immediately, the delayed gratification of waiting for development, and grafts these constraints onto a reusable digital core. What emerges is less a nostalgic throwback than a deliberate intervention in how we interact with image-making tools.

The design argument here is worth parsing carefully. Constraint, when applied with intention, can redirect attention and reshape behavior in ways that pure capability expansion cannot. The ONE35 V2 doesn’t ask users to appreciate limitation for its own sake. It proposes that limitation might produce something that unlimited access has gradually eroded: the weight of a single frame, the suspense of unseen results, the social ritual of collective reveal.

Form Language and Material Identity

Physically, the ONE35 V2 speaks a dialect of late-1990s consumer electronics, updated with contemporary material sensibilities. The body arrives in eight colorways ranging from high-contrast pairings like Yellow/Black and Red/White to more subdued options like Coffee/Cream. Two variants feature transparent shells that expose internal componentry, a direct nod to the see-through electronics trend that peaked around 1999 with devices like the iMac G3 and translucent Game Boy Color. The proportions feel familiar, chunky without being bulky, designed to disappear into a jacket pocket or small bag.

Color blocking dominates the visual strategy. Each variant commits to two tones maximum, avoiding the gradient meshes and complex surface treatments common in contemporary consumer tech. This restraint serves the object’s conceptual positioning: it looks like something you would find at a beach shop checkout in 2001, yet the material finish and assembly precision read as current. The plastic shells have a matte texture on most models, reducing fingerprint visibility and giving the camera a tactile presence that glossy alternatives would sacrifice.

The transparent variants deserve particular attention. Exposing circuitry and internal structure creates an honesty of construction that opaque housings inherently conceal. You see the battery, the sensor housing, the flash capacitor. This transparency also functions as a trust signal, suggesting the device has nothing to hide about its relatively simple internals. There’s no pretense of computational complexity here, just the essential components required to capture and store 27 images at a time.

Materiality extends to the accessory ecosystem. A vegan leather case at $19 positions the camera as an object worth protecting and displaying, not a disposable item despite its disposable-camera heritage. The existence of branded caps and lanyards suggests Flashback understands the ONE35 as a lifestyle product, something users might want to signal ownership of rather than simply use.

Interaction Architecture: How Constraint Reshapes Behavior

Twenty-seven exposures. That number, pulled directly from the standard frame count of disposable film cameras, functions as the ONE35 V2’s primary behavioral lever. Disposables dominated casual photography from the late 1980s through the early 2000s before smartphones consolidated image capture into always-available, unlimited-capacity devices. By imposing the same ceiling, the ONE35 V2 forces a kind of photographic triage that contemporary shooters rarely practice: you cannot spray-and-pray when each frame represents roughly 3.7% of your available shots.

Scarcity changes the shooting ritual in observable ways. Users report thinking before pressing the shutter, evaluating whether a moment warrants one of their limited frames. The camera transforms from a capture-everything tool into something closer to a curation device, where selection happens at the point of exposure rather than afterward in a bloated camera roll. Each shot carries psychological weight proportional to the constraint.

The 24-hour development delay in Classic Mode introduces a second behavioral intervention. Instead of chimping (the photographer’s habit of immediately reviewing each shot on the camera’s screen), users must wait a full day before seeing results. This delay severs the feedback loop that digital photography introduced, the instant gratification that allows endless re-shooting until the perfect frame emerges. Without that loop, users either accept what they captured or miss the moment entirely.

Flashback’s decision to include Digicam Mode alongside Classic Mode reveals a pragmatic understanding of user psychology. Some shooters want the constraint of limited exposures without the enforced patience of delayed development. Others want the full experience. By making the delay optional, the ONE35 V2 acknowledges that not every context suits maximum friction, a party might call for immediate sharing that a travel diary would not.

The transfer workflow also carries design intention. Photos unload via Lightning or USB-C cable to the Flashback app, which handles what the company frames as “development.” The cable requirement is notable in an era of wireless everything. It creates a deliberate moment of connection, a physical ritual that separates capture time from viewing time. You must decide to plug in, to initiate the transfer, to move from shooter to viewer.

What Constraint Produces

The behavioral implications extend beyond individual users into social dynamics. At parties or group events, the ONE35 becomes a shared object that circulates hand to hand, with each person granted temporary access to a limited pool of exposures. This communal aspect mirrors how disposable cameras functioned at weddings and gatherings in the pre-smartphone era: multiple people contributing to a single roll that no one could immediately review.

The delayed reveal transforms image sharing from instant broadcast into group ritual. When Classic Mode holds photos for 24 hours, the eventual viewing becomes an event rather than a continuous trickle. Group chats waiting for a camera’s worth of party photos to “develop” experience collective anticipation, a social texture that immediate availability cannot replicate. Flashback’s marketing leans into this with phrases like “your friends will be begging you to share.”

There’s also an environmental dimension to consider. Disposable cameras generate physical waste with every roll: plastic housing, battery, packaging, chemical development. The ONE35 V2 retains the behavioral structure while eliminating the material throughput. One device, rechargeable via USB-C, replaces hundreds of single-use cameras over its lifespan. The sustainability argument nests inside the experience design rather than leading it.

Cultural Positioning: Where This Object Lives

The ONE35 V2 enters a market already primed for analog revival and digital skepticism. Film photography has seen sustained growth since the mid-2010s, driven partly by aesthetic preference but also by users seeking relief from the infinite scroll of digital capture. Fujifilm’s disposable cameras routinely sell out. Kodak has reintroduced discontinued film stocks. The secondhand market for film cameras has pushed prices for once-cheap bodies into collector territory.

Within this landscape, the ONE35 occupies an interesting niche. It doesn’t require users to learn film handling, find processing labs, or pay per-roll development costs. The app handles what chemistry once did, for free, indefinitely. But it preserves the behavioral constraints that film imposed, the limitations that many film revivalists cite as the actual source of appeal. In this sense, the camera represents a kind of constraint extraction: pulling the valuable behavioral friction out of an analog medium and transplanting it into a digital one.

The “screen detox” movement provides additional context. Products and services promising to reduce smartphone dependency have proliferated over the past five years, from grayscale phone modes to minimalist devices like the Light Phone. The ONE35 V2 aligns with this impulse without requiring users to abandon connectivity entirely. You can still have your smartphone in your pocket. You simply capture certain moments with a different tool, one that encourages presence during the event and patience afterward.

Flashback’s origin story reinforces this positioning. Founders Kelric and Mack reportedly started the project after observing that partygoers spent more time on their phones than engaging with each other. The garage-prototype-to-Kickstarter arc (reaching $80,000 in 13 minutes, $800,000 total) suggests the observation resonated with a substantial audience. The subsequent Good Design Award and Shark Tank appearance mark a trajectory from indie curiosity to legitimate product category.

What the ONE35 V2 Signals

The camera’s success, 50,000 units across 68 countries, 10 million captured images, suggests that designed constraint has commercial viability beyond niche appeal. Users are paying $119 for a device that does less than their phones, specifically because it does less. This inverts the typical value proposition of consumer electronics, where more features justify higher prices.

What Flashback demonstrates is that subtraction can constitute a design feature when the thing being subtracted has become a source of friction itself. Unlimited storage, instant preview, always-on connectivity: these capabilities solved problems when they emerged, but they’ve also generated new ones. The ONE35 V2 proposes that rolling back certain capabilities, with intention and care, might address the second-order problems the first capabilities created. Pick up the camera. Feel its compact, slightly chunky form. Press the shutter knowing you have 26 frames left. That deliberate friction is the product.

The post The Flashback ONE35 V2 Turns Limitation Into Its Most Compelling Feature first appeared on Yanko Design.

When the Wolf Is Already Part of You: Yama Moon’s Quiet Character Design

Most illustration that deals with human-animal hybridity treats it as a problem to be solved, a boundary to be crossed or defended, a transformation caught mid-process. Yamazuki Mari refuses this framing entirely. Her figures don’t struggle with their condition. They wear it.

A woman stands before a massive black wolf, their bodies aligned so precisely that the creature reads less as a separate entity and more as an extension of her silhouette. No tension exists between them. No drama of possession or escape. Mari positions the wolf head directly above the woman’s own, along the same vertical axis, creating a visual grammar of doubling rather than confrontation. The relationship feels ceremonial, almost devotional, with the wolf serving as guardian rather than threat.

What makes this work distinctive isn’t the subject matter but the formal clarity she brings to it. Against deep black backgrounds, her figures emerge in pale creams and icy blues, coloring deliberately muted to let compositional geometry carry emotional weight.

Surface as Signal

Mari builds atmosphere through material choices that reward close attention. Fine crosshatched textures give her digital work a tactile quality suggesting engraving or woodcut, linking contemporary illustration to centuries of folk art tradition. When color does assert itself, it arrives as intrusion: coral red branches cutting through darkness like warning signals, their sharpness creating tension against the soft gradients of hair and fur.

Her background in graphic design shows in the disciplined relationship between figure and ground. Black backgrounds create ceremonial weight. White backgrounds create clinical clarity. Neither choice is neutral, and the shift between them across her body of work creates a tonal range that color specification alone can’t achieve.

By introducing fine grain and crosshatching into digital illustration, Mari creates a surface quality that resists the smoothness associated with computer-generated imagery. The textures read as handmade even when they’re not, and this material fiction supports the folkloric atmosphere her subjects require. The wolf’s fur carries the same visual density as the woman’s hair, unifying disparate biological forms through shared treatment.

Color operates with similar intentionality. Limited palettes prevent the images from reading as naturalistic while specific hues, coral red against midnight blue, winter gray against bone white, carry cultural associations that enrich the viewing experience without requiring explicit narrative. Red as warning, white as purity or death, black as depth or the unconscious: Mari leverages these associations without being constrained by them.

Stillness as Strategy

Stillness in Mari’s work isn’t absence of movement but rather the deliberate suspension of it.

Her compositions feel frozen at the instant before something happens, and this temporal ambiguity becomes a structural principle. The woman and wolf don’t move because they exist outside of narrative time. They occupy a space where transformation has already occurred and no further change is necessary. Traditional fantasy illustration often relies on dynamism to generate interest, filling the frame with action that guides the eye along predictable paths. Mari inverts this expectation. Her figures hold their positions, and the viewer must do the work of discovering the relationships between elements.

The result is an experience closer to portrait study than narrative illustration, where the reward comes from sustained attention rather than immediate comprehension.

Motion as Rupture

Her second piece abandons stillness entirely, and the contrast illuminates what the first image withholds. A human figure fuses with a lunging wolf in mid-leap, their bodies stretched forward in parallel lines of urgent motion. The wolf’s jaws are open, its eye wide with instinct, and the scene pulses with predatory energy that the first composition suppressed.

Cool grays and winter whites dominate the palette, replacing ceremonial blacks with something closer to raw weather. Sharp white branches frame the movement like cracked ice. The grainy textures that felt archival in the static piece now read as velocity blur. Same technical vocabulary, entirely different emotional results.

What the motion reveals is the cost of transformation. Static imagery presented hybridity as achieved and peaceful. Dynamic imagery shows it as ongoing and violent. These aren’t contradictory statements but rather complementary views of the same condition: the wolf is both guardian and hunter, protector and predator, and the human figure rides that duality rather than resolving it.

Mari doesn’t choose between interpretations because choosing would reduce the complexity her work investigates.

Tenderness Without Sentiment

Her final piece pivots toward something that resembles cuteness but refuses to commit to it. Two small catlike figures stand side by side against a clean white background, their rounded forms and oversized fur collars giving them a plush, doll-like presence. One wears red, the other blue. The color dialogue emphasizes individuality within obvious companionship.

Simplicity here is deceptive. These figures share the hybrid logic of the wolf pieces, with feline ears, tails, and paw-like hands rendering them not quite animal and not quite human. Their expressions are subdued rather than cheerful, and this restraint prevents the image from tipping into pure whimsy.

Mari names them May and Mii, the Nekochi, describing them as inseparable companions ready for playful mischief. The characterization suggests personality and relationship, but the visual treatment maintains distance. She doesn’t animate their mischief or show them in action. Like the woman and the wolf, they simply exist in their hybrid state, present to the viewer without performing.

Grammar of Integration

Across all three works, Mari establishes a consistent visual grammar for depicting hybridity. Human and animal elements don’t compete for dominance within the frame. They occupy the same compositional space with equal formal weight, aligned along shared axes, rendered with equivalent levels of detail.

Neither element reads as metaphor for the other.

The wolf isn’t the woman’s inner nature made visible. The woman isn’t the wolf’s civilized aspect. They exist together as a unified presence that simply happens to contain both forms. This approach distinguishes her work from transformation imagery in the Western fantasy tradition, where hybridity typically signifies conflict, corruption, or metamorphosis in progress. Mari’s hybrids carry no implication of instability. They aren’t becoming something else. They’ve already become, and the images document that completed state with the formal precision of taxonomy rather than the drama of mythology.

Cultural lineage matters here. Japanese visual traditions have long accommodated hybrid beings without requiring them to resolve into single identities. Kitsune, tanuki, and other shapeshifters populate folklore not as monsters to be defeated but as neighbors to be negotiated with. Mari draws on this heritage while filtering it through contemporary illustration sensibilities, producing images that feel simultaneously ancient and digitally native.

What the Hybrids Suggest

Most depictions of human-animal fusion carry anxiety about boundary dissolution, about losing the characteristics that define human identity.

Mari’s figures express no such concern. They wear their hybridity as comfortably as the Nekochi wear their fur collars, as a feature of existence rather than a problem to be solved. This comfort may be the most radical aspect of her visual language. In a design context where character illustration often relies on conflict, transformation, or aspiration to generate viewer engagement, Mari offers figures who’ve arrived at a place of integration and simply occupy it.

The wolf doesn’t need to devour the woman. The woman doesn’t need to tame the wolf. The Nekochi don’t need to choose between their feline and humanoid aspects.

For illustrators working in character design, the approach suggests an alternative to narrative-driven imagery. Not every character needs to be caught mid-journey. Some can simply exist, fully realized, inviting the viewer to spend time in their presence rather than anticipate their next transformation. Mari’s hybrids model this possibility with quiet confidence, their stillness a form of visual authority that movement would only diminish.

The post When the Wolf Is Already Part of You: Yama Moon’s Quiet Character Design first appeared on Yanko Design.

Apple’s Foldable iPhone May Have Solved the Display Crease Problem That Has Plagued Every Competitor

Every foldable phone currently on the market carries the same visible compromise: a crease running down the center of the internal display. You notice it immediately when light catches the fold at certain angles. Samsung has iterated through six generations of the Galaxy Z Fold line, refining hinge mechanisms, adjusting UTG formulations (the ultrathin glass layers that cover foldable displays), and experimenting with display stack configurations. The crease persists. Google’s Pixel Fold carries it. Motorola’s razr carries it. The crease has become an accepted industry tax, a visual and tactile reminder that folding glass remains an unsolved materials engineering challenge.

What we know: Jon Prosser leaked renders on December 24, 2025 depicting a book style foldable iPhone alongside the iPhone 18 series, targeted for Fall 2026, with reported pricing between $2,000 and $2,500. What remains unverified: The central claim of zero visible crease, which cannot be confirmed until production hardware is tested.

Recent leaks from Prosser suggest Apple intends to eliminate this compromise entirely. The renders depict a book style foldable iPhone expected alongside the iPhone 18 series in Fall 2026. Zero visible crease on the internal display. If accurate, this represents not an incremental refinement but a fundamental breakthrough in foldable display architecture.

The Engineering Challenge Behind the Crease

Understanding why the crease exists requires examining the layer stack of a flexible OLED panel, and the answer lies in material behavior rather than design oversight. Traditional rigid OLEDs use glass substrates that provide structural stability and optical clarity, creating a surface that feels seamless under the finger and reflects light uniformly across its entire area. Foldable displays replace this glass with plastic substrates, typically polyimide (PI), which can flex repeatedly without fracturing but responds to mechanical stress in ways that accumulate over time, and the plastic remembers each fold. Each fold leaves a trace, invisible at first, then gradually visible as the substrate fatigues along the bend axis. Samsung’s UTG approach adds a thin glass layer for improved feel and scratch resistance, but that glass develops micro-fractures along the bend radius that compound the problem over time.

When a foldable display bends along its hinge axis, the material on the outer curve stretches while the material on the inner curve compresses. This differential stress accumulates at the fold line, creating permanent deformation in the plastic substrate. The encapsulation layers, touch sensor films, and polarizer sheets all respond differently to this stress, compounding the visible crease into something you can both see and feel. If you run your fingertip slowly across the center of any current foldable, that slight bump tells the story of mechanical compromise.

The bend radius matters enormously, because tighter radii create more stress concentration while wider radii reduce stress but increase device thickness when closed. Every foldable manufacturer has navigated this tradeoff differently, but none has eliminated the fundamental physics that creates the crease.

Apple’s Alleged Solution: Metal Dispersion and Liquid Metal Hinges

Prosser’s leak describes two key engineering innovations, and the approach is clever in its simplicity. The first involves a metal plate positioned beneath the display that disperses bending pressure across a wider area rather than concentrating it along a single axis.

The dispersion plate concept addresses the stress concentration problem directly, representing a fundamental rethinking of how force should travel through a folding display stack. Rather than allowing the display to experience maximum strain along a narrow fold line, the metal plate would distribute that mechanical load across a broader zone. This approach resembles structural engineering principles used in suspension bridges, where forces spread across multiple support points rather than concentrated at single anchors. The geometry of such a plate would need to be precisely calculated, balancing flexibility with rigidity, weight with durability. Whether Apple has developed a plate configuration that achieves this without adding prohibitive thickness or weight remains the critical engineering question.

The second innovation involves a liquid metal hinge mechanism, likely referencing Apple’s existing work with Liquidmetal, a zirconium-based amorphous alloy the company has explored in various applications since acquiring licensing rights in August 2010. Amorphous metal alloys can be molded into complex geometries with extremely tight tolerances, potentially enabling hinge designs that control the bend profile more precisely than machined components allow. The material’s natural lubricity and resistance to fatigue could improve long-term reliability, addressing the mechanical feel of traditional hinges with something that operates more fluidly.

Form Factor Analysis: What the Dimensions Reveal

The leaked dimensions reveal Apple’s engineering priorities with unusual clarity. The device measures 9mm thick when closed, splitting to approximately 4.5mm per half, making the unfolded thickness sit at just 4.5mm. The iPhone 15 Pro measures 8.25mm. Apple’s foldable, closed, would be only marginally thicker than current flagship iPhones while delivering a 7.8-inch internal display.

These dimensions suggest aggressive component miniaturization and careful thermal management. Apple reportedly uses its second generation modem developed internally (C2) and high-density battery cells enabled by a slimmer display driver. The shift from Face ID to Touch ID in the power button represents another space-saving decision, eliminating the TrueDepth camera array that occupies significant volume in current iPhone designs.

The Production Reality Gap

Renders exist in a frictionless conceptual space. Every surface appears seamless. Every material performs to theoretical maximum.

Production hardware operates under different constraints, and the question of whether Apple has genuinely solved the crease problem cannot be answered until someone folds and unfolds a production unit under varied lighting conditions, at different temperatures, after thousands of cycles. The crease typically worsens with age as wear accumulates. A render cannot show what happens at month six. Previous reports suggested Apple figured out how to minimize the crease; Prosser’s leak suggests it might be eliminated entirely. These statements describe meaningfully different engineering achievements: minimization implies a visible crease less pronounced than competitors, while elimination implies none at all.

Material Considerations and Manufacturing Scale

Assuming Apple has developed a crease-free folding mechanism, the question becomes whether it can be manufactured at iPhone scale. Apple ships iPhones at a scale that dwarfs the entire foldable category. Every component must be producible in quantities that dwarf what Samsung delivers for its foldable line, where foldable shipments represent a small fraction of overall smartphone volumes.

The dispersion plate, if it uses exotic geometries or materials, could present manufacturing bottlenecks that slow initial production to a trickle. Liquid metal components require specialized casting and forming processes that Apple has used only in limited applications: SIM tray ejector tools, Apple Watch Series 9 buttons. Scaling to display-size components at flagship volumes would require substantial production infrastructure investment. Display panel supply presents another constraint. Samsung Display currently dominates flexible OLED production, and Apple has worked with LG Display and BOE to diversify its supplier base, but building capacity for an entirely new flexible panel format would require years of development and billions in capital expenditure from panel makers. The supply chain alone could determine whether this device ships in millions or hundreds of thousands.

Pricing and Market Position

The expected price tells its own story. Prosser suggests pricing between $2,000 and $2,500, though he hedges on the exact figure.

This range positions the foldable iPhone above the Galaxy Z Fold 6, which starts at $1,899, while falling short of the most extreme luxury phone territory. For Apple, this represents uncharted pricing for a mainstream product line. The iPhone Air’s reported sales struggles, if accurate, suggest limits to what consumers will pay for form factor innovation alone. The foldable iPhone will test whether Apple’s brand premium extends to a new device category or whether the foldable market itself has a price ceiling that even Apple cannot exceed.

Color options limited to black and white reflect Apple’s tendency to constrain initial product launches, signaling a cautious market entry rather than a mass market push. Premium positioning with limited variants allows Apple to manage supply constraints while testing demand at the high end of the price spectrum.

The strategic bet is clear, and Apple appears confident enough buyers exist at this price point to justify years of R&D and tooling investment, even if the initial addressable market remains narrow.

The Broader Display Technology Implications

If Apple has genuinely solved the crease problem, the implications ripple far beyond smartphones, touching every device category that could benefit from flexible displays. Foldable tablets, laptops with folding displays, and rollable screen formats all face similar material constraints, and a breakthrough in stress distribution or substrate engineering would have applications across the entire flexible display industry. The solution, whatever form it takes, would likely be protected by extensive patent filings. This could create licensing opportunities or, more likely given Apple’s historical tendencies, a proprietary advantage that competitors cannot easily replicate.

Samsung has built its foldable ecosystem partly on component sales. An Apple breakthrough using internally developed technology would disrupt that supply chain dynamic. Other manufacturers would need to license Apple’s approach or develop their own solutions from scratch.

The timing of a Fall 2026 launch, if accurate, gives Apple nearly two years to refine manufacturing, build component inventory, and develop the software experiences that justify a foldable form factor. iOS adaptations for larger internal displays, multitasking paradigms, and app developer frameworks would all require substantial engineering investment beyond the hardware itself. The display breakthrough means nothing without software that makes the larger screen worth having.

What Remains Unknown

The crease claim stands as the most important detail and the least verifiable. Prosser has accurately predicted some Apple announcements and missed on others. His track record provides some credibility but not certainty. Until production hardware reaches independent reviewers, the fundamental promise of Apple’s foldable remains speculative.

The legal context adds intrigue, and the question of source reliability becomes harder to untangle when litigation enters the picture. Apple sued Prosser in July 2025 for leaking iOS 26 and Liquid Glass design details, and his response appears to be leaking even more. Whether this reflects confidence in his sources or defiance toward Apple’s legal pressure is difficult to assess from outside. For the foldable display industry, the claim itself matters regardless of accuracy: if Apple believes a crease-free folding display is achievable, the engineering resources the company can deploy dwarf what any competitor has invested. Even if the initial implementation falls short of the leaked renders’ promise, Apple’s entry would accelerate development across the entire foldable ecosystem. The question that defines this product will not be answered by renders or leaks. It will be answered by light catching, or not catching, a fold line at certain angles. By fingertips feeling, or not feeling, a ridge when swiping across the center of a 7.8-inch display. Fall 2026 will provide the answer.

Specifications

The leaked specifications paint a picture of aggressive engineering tradeoffs. Apple appears to have prioritized thinness and internal display size over external screen real estate, betting that users will spend most of their time with the device unfolded. The choice of Touch ID over Face ID represents a meaningful departure from Apple’s biometric strategy of the past decade, suggesting the engineering constraints of fitting a foldable mechanism left no room for the TrueDepth camera array.

Specification Details
External Display 5.5 inches
Internal Display 7.8 inches
Closed Thickness 9mm
Unfolded Thickness 4.5mm
Hinge Type Liquid metal mechanism with dispersion plate (reported)
Biometrics Touch ID (power button)
Modem Apple C2, reported as second generation internal modem
Colors Black, White
Expected Price $2,000 to $2,500
Expected Launch Fall 2026

These numbers remain unverified until production hardware surfaces. Prosser’s track record includes both accurate predictions and notable misses, so treating any single specification as confirmed would be premature. The fall 2026 timeline, if accurate, gives Apple roughly eighteen months from now to finalize these details.

The post Apple’s Foldable iPhone May Have Solved the Display Crease Problem That Has Plagued Every Competitor first appeared on Yanko Design.

When a V10 Engine Becomes a Brutalist Coffee Table

A V10 engine block possesses a particular kind of architectural presence that most furniture actively avoids. The cast aluminum surfaces carry tooling marks from industrial machining. The bolt patterns follow functional logic rather than decorative intent. The mass distribution reflects combustion dynamics, not ergonomic considerations. When this assemblage becomes a coffee table, the object enters a different conversation entirely: one about what happens when mechanical purpose gives way to spatial presence, and whether the transformation honors or obscures the original form.

The piece that sold on Bring a Trailer for $6,350 approaches this question with unusual directness. JcCustoms finished a pieced-together V10 powertrain in black, capped it with red valve covers bearing Viper script, and placed the entire assembly beneath glass at conventional coffee table height. The result reads as neither automotive memorabilia nor standard furniture, but as something closer to an industrial artifact placed deliberately in domestic context. The 350-pound mass anchors itself to the floor with repurposed pistons serving as feet, completing a material vocabulary that runs consistently from base to crown. Every surface announces its origin. Every bolt pattern declares that this object once served a purpose far removed from supporting coffee cups and design magazines.

Form Language and Color Strategy

The color palette operates through deliberate contrast rather than subtlety. The black engine block and black intake manifold establish a dark, absorptive core that reads as negative space beneath the glass surface. Red valve covers provide the primary chromatic accent, positioned to catch light and draw attention to the components that would matter most in a functioning engine. Silver exhaust manifolds sit outboard, reflecting ambient illumination and creating a metallic counterpoint to the matte aluminum and gloss-painted surfaces at center.

This arrangement follows a logic rooted in automotive presentation rather than interior design convention. Performance vehicles use red accents to signal aggression. Black components suggest technical seriousness. Silver hardware implies precision engineering. The table inherits these associations without requiring explanation, communicating through a visual language that anyone who has walked past a car dealership will recognize on some level. The meaning transfers even when the machinery no longer functions.

The Manifold Penetration

The most consequential design decision involves the intake manifold’s relationship to the glass top. Rather than sealing the engine beneath a continuous surface, the builder cut a central aperture that allows the manifold to pass through the plane of the glass and emerge into the user’s space above. This gesture transforms the table from a display case into something more spatially assertive: the manifold becomes a vertical element, almost sculptural, rising from the mechanical base like an industrial totem.

The penetration creates several simultaneous effects. It breaks the expected boundary between object and surface. It introduces vertical rhythm to a horizontal form. It makes the table physically difficult to use as a conventional surface, since the manifold occupies prime real estate at center. Most significantly, it declares that the engine’s form matters more than the table’s function, that the manifold’s sculptural presence justifies the functional compromise of a smaller usable area around its edges.

Materiality and Construction Logic

The glass top measures approximately 44 inches square and positions the overall height at roughly 21.5 inches from floor to upper surface. These dimensions place the object within conventional coffee table parameters, suggesting that whoever built it understood the constraints of living with furniture even while prioritizing visual impact over utility. The footprint works in most residential configurations. The height allows seated users to reach across the surface. The proportions read as intentional rather than accidental. Standard furniture dimensions applied to non-standard furniture content creates a productive tension: the object fits spatially while refusing to fit conceptually. This deliberate mismatch between expected form and unexpected content drives much of the piece’s visual interest, forcing viewers to reconcile the familiar coffee table silhouette with the unfamiliar mechanical presence beneath the glass.

Below the glass, the engine assembly reveals its pieced-together origins. Commenters on the auction identified components that appear more consistent with Ram SRT-10 truck applications than pure Viper specification, and noted that certain valve covers may have been installed in reversed orientation. These observations matter for collectors concerned with authenticity, but they matter differently for design evaluation. The object never claimed mechanical integrity. It claimed visual coherence, and the assembled components deliver that coherence regardless of their original applications.

The pistons repurposed as feet extend the material language vertically and provide stable support for the substantial mass. This detail demonstrates the builder’s commitment to vocabulary consistency: rather than hiding the base beneath generic leveling feet, the design incorporates additional engine components to maintain the automotive reference from every viewing angle. The gesture costs nothing functionally while reinforcing the object’s identity at every point of contact with the floor.

Spatial Implications

Placing this object in a room reorganizes the space around it. The 350-pound mass cannot be casually repositioned. The visual intensity demands clear sightlines from seating areas. The scale requires sufficient floor area to breathe, ideally with circulation paths that allow viewers to approach from multiple angles. The table functions best in spaces designed around its presence rather than spaces that accommodate it as an afterthought.

This inversion of the typical furniture-space relationship aligns the piece with sculptural installation logic. A Brancusi or a Serra reorganizes the gallery around itself. This engine table, at a different scale and in a different context, performs a similar operation on domestic space. The living room becomes a setting for the object rather than the object becoming a component of the living room. Whether this constitutes design success depends entirely on whether the owner wants a room that serves the furniture or furniture that serves the room. The answer varies by temperament. Some inhabitants will thrive with an anchor piece that organizes everything else around it. Others will find the gravitational pull exhausting.

The Transformation Question

What distinguishes this execution from cruder automotive furniture attempts is the clarity of the design position. Many engine tables bury the machinery beneath excessive glass, padding the visual impact with transparency until the mechanical forms become background texture. Others over-restore the components, chasing a showroom cleanliness that erases the industrial character. JcCustoms found a middle register: finished enough to read as intentional, raw enough to preserve the material authenticity that makes the object interesting in the first place.

The black-and-red palette references Viper identity without reproducing it literally. The aperture asserts sculptural ambition without abandoning table function entirely. Each decision reflects restraint as much as assertion, suggesting a builder who understood that engine tables succeed or fail based on what they choose not to do as much as what they add. Knowing when to stop matters as much as knowing what to include. JcCustoms stopped at the right moment.

Object Status After Function

The $6,350 hammer price establishes this piece as serious furniture for a narrow audience, but the design implications extend beyond market validation. This table represents one answer to a question that contemporary culture increasingly confronts: what happens to mechanical objects when their original purpose ends? Engines fail. Vehicles get scrapped. Components enter a liminal state between artifact and waste. Someone chose transformation over dissolution, preservation through reimagining rather than preservation through stasis.

One response treats these objects as raw material for recycling, melting the aluminum back into commodity feedstock. Another response preserves them as static memorabilia, freezing the machinery in museum context. This table proposes a third path: transformation into new objects that acknowledge their origins while serving different functions. The engine remains recognizable as an engine. It also becomes furniture. Both identities coexist in the finished piece, neither fully displacing the other.

The buyer who claimed this object now owns something that occupies multiple categories simultaneously. It functions as a table, barely. It functions as sculpture, more convincingly. It functions as automotive artifact, somewhat ambiguously given the mixed-source components. It functions as conversation anchor, inevitably and permanently. The object will outlast the buyer’s patience for explaining it, will survive the inevitable scratches on its glass, will persist through changes in interior design fashion, will remain exactly what it is regardless of how the surrounding room evolves around it. Mechanical objects built for permanence tend to achieve it, even when their original function disappears.

The post When a V10 Engine Becomes a Brutalist Coffee Table first appeared on Yanko Design.

2025 Audi Q5 TFSI quattro Prestige Review: Evolution as a Design Strategy

PROS:


  • Interior material quality exceeds what the segment typically delivers

  • Screen integration feels intentional rather than bolted on afterward

  • Adaptive air suspension transforms ride character between driving modes

  • Acoustic glass creates genuinely quiet cabin at highway speeds

  • Real exhaust outlets signal design honesty throughout the vehicle

CONS:


  • Rearward visibility compromised by styling choices and roofline rake

  • No hands-free liftgate gesture system like competitors offer

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

Evolution as philosophy: when restraint becomes the boldest design choice.

I spent a week with the third-generation Audi Q5 Prestige in Tambora Gray Metallic, and what struck me first was not any single feature but the accumulation of considered choices. Built on Volkswagen Group’s Premium Platform Combustion architecture with a turbocharged 2.0-liter TFSI four-cylinder producing 261 horsepower and 273 lb-ft of torque, this compact luxury SUV occupies familiar territory at $63,290 as tested. The design decisions embedded in its surfaces, proportions, and material selections tell a more nuanced story. The Q5 represents what happens when a manufacturer chooses careful iteration over spectacle.

Designer: Audi

What distinguishes this generation from its predecessor is not a single dramatic gesture but rather an accumulation of details that reveal themselves over days rather than minutes, over highway miles rather than showroom walks, over lived experience rather than specification comparisons. The raked silhouette borrows visual vocabulary from the larger Q7, establishing family resemblance without direct mimicry. Panel gaps have tightened to tolerances that reward close inspection. The decorative exhaust finishers have been replaced with genuine rectangular outlets, a small change that signals larger philosophical shifts about authenticity in automotive design. These aren’t features that demand attention at first glance. They’re details that accumulate into a stance that reads as resolved rather than aggressive, as confident rather than desperate to impress, as the work of engineers and designers who understood that restraint requires more discipline than excess.

The vehicle’s proportions establish its intent before any specification sheet is consulted. Wheelbase dimensions remain close to the previous generation, but cargo volume has expanded to 56.9 cubic feet with rear seats folded, a gain of 2.8 cubic feet. That’s design as problem-solving.

Exterior Form Language

The singleframe grille anchors the front fascia with a presence that has become signature Audi vocabulary, wider and higher than before, flanked by functional air curtains that channel airflow along the body sides, reduce turbulence around the front wheels, and contribute measurably to the 25 mpg combined fuel economy figure while adding horizontal emphasis to the front that grounds the vehicle’s face as the LED lighting signatures lift the eye upward, creating a tension between opposing visual forces that produces dynamism without chaos. In person, the Tambora Gray Metallic finish shifts subtly between cool silver and warm graphite depending on the light, a $595 option that flatters the Q5’s surfacing without demanding attention, revealing the gentle curves of the fender flares and the controlled tension of door panel surfacing in ways that more dramatic colors would overwhelm. I walked around this vehicle at least a dozen times during my week with it, and each angle revealed something slightly different about how Audi’s design team approached the challenge of updating a successful shape without losing what made it work.

That’s restraint as design strategy.

The Prestige trim’s LED headlights plus with eight digital DRL signatures represent a departure from the notion that headlights are merely functional, allowing personalization within boundaries that maintain brand coherence, while the digital OLED taillights transform the vehicle’s nighttime presence entirely with a full-width light bar and dynamic animation sequences that other drivers will notice before they recognize the Audi badges. Front and rear lighting can now express personality. You can choose character, but the character stays on-brand, never straying into the visual vocabulary of competitors or aftermarket modifications.

The shoulder line carries through the side profile without interruption, a decision that prioritizes visual length over sculptural drama, that trusts the basic proportions to create interest rather than relying on creases and vents and stamped-in details that would only compete for attention. Where competitors might break this line, the Q5 maintains continuity. The 20-inch 5-arm design wheels from the $800 optional wheel package fill the arches convincingly, and the roofline’s rake creates forward momentum even at rest, suggesting capability without the aggressive stance that defines sportier alternatives.

Real exhaust outlets replace the decorative finishers of the outgoing model, communicating mechanical honesty in a market where many competitors still rely on chrome trim pieces that hide the actual exhaust routing somewhere underneath the bumper, a detail that speaks to broader shifts in automotive design thinking about authenticity versus theater, about what we show versus what actually exists, about whether buyers notice or care about such distinctions and what it says about a brand that assumes they do. The previous generation’s false tips suggested performance that the actual exhaust system didn’t support. What you see is what exists. Light catches the fender flares and door panels in ways that reveal gentle curves rather than aggressive angles, while the 12-volt mild hybrid system recovers energy during deceleration invisibly, feeding it back into the electrical architecture that powers the countless systems modern buyers expect, the design absorbing the technology rather than announcing it, integrating engineering advances into surfaces that look simpler than they are.

Interior Architecture

The cabin represents the most significant departure from the previous generation. Sliding into the Pearl Beige interior for the first time, you notice the difference immediately. Where the predecessor was criticized for visual austerity, the new interior addresses this through layered materials and deliberate contrast.

The 14.5-inch MMI touch display dominates the center stack with a presence that might overwhelm in lesser integrations, but here it sits within the dashboard architecture rather than perched atop it like an afterthought, paired with the 11.9-inch Audi virtual cockpit plus that renders navigation and vehicle information with the kind of clarity and customization that once defined luxury flagships, while the Prestige package adds a 10.9-inch MMI passenger display that allows front passengers to manage navigation or entertainment without distracting the driver, though I found myself wondering whether the additional screen complexity serves real needs or simply provides another differentiator on specification sheets that buyers compare without understanding what they actually want. Screen integration matters more than screen dimensions. Too many competitors treat displays as afterthoughts, floating tablets stuck to dashboards designed before touchscreens became standard. Here, the screens belong, and that belonging required more engineering effort than simply making them larger.

The driver’s position establishes immediate relationship to the controls. Power tilt-and-telescopic steering allows precise positioning. The head-up display projects information directly into the sightline. Tri-zone climate control divides the cabin into manageable thermal territories. These are ergonomic solutions dressed in premium materials.

Rear seat architecture employs a 40/20/40 split-folding configuration with sliding capability. The center section folds independently. This configuration solves real-world problems.

Storage solutions throughout the cabin demonstrate attention to daily use patterns, expanding door bins and reorganized center console compartments creating a space that feels designed by people who actually load groceries and manage coffee cups during commutes rather than by stylists optimizing photography angles, while the LED interior lighting pro package adds atmosphere without distraction, touching surfaces that matter at night, transforming the Pearl Beige leather into warmer tones under ambient illumination that makes the cabin feel like a different space after dark, more intimate, more considered, without requiring any adjustment from the driver beyond the simple act of driving into evening.

Material Composition

Material selection in the Q5 follows a hierarchy of touch frequency that allocates budget where it matters most to perceived quality, soft-touch plastics yielding appropriately under pressure on surfaces that hands contact regularly, leather wrapping appearing where fingers rest during normal driving, metal accents providing cool contrast to warmer materials, while lower surfaces that are seen but rarely touched employ more practical materials that clean easily and resist the wear that comes from thousands of entries and exits, from muddy shoes in winter and sandy feet in summer, from the accumulated debris of lives actually lived in vehicles rather than merely photographed in them. This graduated approach represents mature design thinking.

Run a hand across the dashboard, and you feel seams, grain, the subtle undulation of material stretched over structure.

Technology Integration

The MMI interface operates through that 14.5-inch touchscreen with a responsiveness that has improved markedly from previous generations, haptic feedback providing confirmation of inputs, menu structures reorganized to reduce navigation depth for common functions, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration appearing as expected equipment alongside smartphone mirroring that handles the connection without the lag that plagues some competitors, while navigation through the MMI Navigation plus system renders on either the center screen or the Virtual Cockpit depending on preference, allowing drivers to keep route guidance in their primary sightline rather than glancing repeatedly toward the center stack. The system works. It doesn’t delight, but it doesn’t frustrate either, which may be the more important achievement.

Driver assistance helps without replacing. Adaptive cruise assist maintains distance. Lane-keeping provides gentle input. Blind-spot monitoring illuminates warnings where they belong.

The Bang & Olufsen sound system with 3D sound represents the kind of feature that separates luxury from mainstream, speaker placement optimized for the cabin’s acoustic properties, resulting sound quality rewarding careful listening with spatial depth that the 3D processing enhances without artificiality, dialogue in podcasts and calls maintaining clarity at any volume level, bass response that never overwhelms or distorts, treble that sparkles without harshness, and an overall presentation that treats sound as part of the ownership experience rather than as a checkbox on a features list, though whether the additional cost over the standard Audi sound system justifies itself depends on how much time you spend with music versus podcasts versus phone calls versus the blessed silence that the acoustic front door glass enables.

That’s considered acoustic engineering. Not afterthought. Not badge upgrade.

Powertrain Character

The 2.0-liter turbocharged TFSI four-cylinder delivers 261 horsepower through a seven-speed S tronic dual-clutch transmission with standard quattro all-wheel drive, acceleration to 60 mph arriving in approximately 5.7 seconds. Quick enough to merge confidently. Not so aggressive that the Q5 pretends it’s something else.

The throttle response sharpens noticeably in Dynamic mode, and you feel the adaptive air suspension firm up within the first few corners, the brake pedal maintaining consistent firmness through repeated stops rather than going soft the way some competitors do when you start pushing harder than normal driving requires, which builds confidence when you find yourself on twisting roads that the Q5 wasn’t explicitly designed for but handles with more composure than its luxury SUV positioning might suggest, the steering weighting up appropriately, the body roll decreasing to levels that keep passengers comfortable rather than alarmed, the overall character shifting from relaxed cruiser to willing partner in ways that feel genuine rather than programmed, the 12-volt mild hybrid system contributing invisibly by recovering energy during deceleration and allowing the engine to shut down earlier during coasting and restart with less perceptible vibration than previous generations managed. Road surface changes come through the floor clearly enough to tell you about grip conditions without intruding on comfort.

Comfort mode isolates. Dynamic mode engages. The vehicle accommodates different moods.

Daily Reality

The quiet cabin emerges from engineering investments that never appear on feature lists, the Prestige’s acoustic front door glass joining sound-deadening materials lining the firewall and floor, upgraded door seals creating tighter barriers against road and wind noise, the panoramic sunroof’s surprisingly effective isolation preventing the drumming that open glass surfaces often produce at highway speeds, all of it combining to create a space where conversation happens at normal volume, where phone calls require no raised voice, where the outside world maintains a respectful distance, where you can think clearly during commutes that would exhaust you in lesser vehicles.

I fit a carry-on, camera bag, and weekend groceries back there without much fuss.

Cargo capacity numbers tell only part of the story, the 56.9 cubic feet available with rear seats folded accommodating large items in theory while the cargo floor’s height and liftgate opening dimensions determine what actually fits in practice, the Q5 managing these secondary measurements well with a floor sitting at reasonable height for loading, an opening wide enough to accept furniture and sporting equipment without excessive maneuvering, a power liftgate that operates with sufficient speed that waiting never feels burdensome, though I wished for a hands-free gesture system that competitors offer, the kind of feature you don’t appreciate until you approach with arms full and discover that someone else’s design team thought further ahead about your actual usage patterns.

The mild hybrid system represents the kind of engineering that never announces itself, recovering energy during deceleration and feeding it back into electrical systems that power climate control, screens, and driver assistance without drawing from the primary powertrain. The 12-volt architecture operates beneath conscious awareness, its presence detectable only in the slightly smoother restart behavior after traffic stops and the fractionally quicker throttle response during initial acceleration. Audi has chosen integration over declaration, embedding efficiency gains into the driving experience rather than celebrating them with dashboard displays or efficiency modes that remind you constantly of their existence.

Visibility from the driver’s seat balances the rakish roofline against practical sightline needs, rearward vision compromised somewhat by styling priorities, the top view camera system compensating effectively during parking maneuvers with its overhead perspective, the ventilated front sport seats proving their worth during warmer days, the side mirrors sized appropriately, the A-pillars intruding less than some competitors, the overall sense being adequate rather than exceptional outward vision, a common trade-off in the segment that the Q5 navigates without distinguishing itself positively or negatively, simply accepting the compromise that modern design priorities impose on driver awareness in exchange for the sleeker proportions that buyers say they want when surveyed about preference and prove they want by opening their wallets.

The ventilated seats earned their keep. The head-up display reduced my glances away from the road. The adaptive cruise made highway miles disappear.

Competitive Context

The compact luxury SUV segment has become perhaps the most contested territory in the automotive market, with the BMW X3 emphasizing driving dynamics, the Mercedes-Benz GLC projecting traditional luxury, the Lexus NX offering advanced hybrid technology, and the Volvo XC60 pursuing Scandinavian restraint, all targeting similar buyers with similar vehicles at similar price points, differentiating through philosophy rather than fundamental capability, through brand values rather than objective superiority, through heritage and design language rather than measurable advantages that would make one choice clearly correct and the others clearly wrong.

Buyers who prioritize sharp handling find the BMW more engaging. Those seeking hybrid efficiency examine the Lexus.

At $63,290 as tested, this Prestige-trimmed Q5 with the 20-inch wheel package enters territory where buyer expectations rise accordingly, the base Q5 starting at $52,200 before destination, the $8,400 Prestige package adding adaptive air suspension, head-up display, digital OLED taillights, panoramic sunroof, ventilated seats, and the Bang & Olufsen 3D sound system among extensive equipment, creating a vehicle that competes not only against segment rivals but against entry-level offerings from Porsche and higher-trim vehicles from mainstream luxury brands, forcing buyers to consider what they actually value and whether the Audi badge, the Virtual Cockpit interface, the specific execution of materials and technology justifies choosing this over alternatives that might offer more in one area while offering less in others.

Who Should Buy This

The Q5 Prestige suits buyers who have arrived, not those announcing their arrival. It rewards those who appreciate quality construction over attention-seeking design, who prefer refinement to drama, and who’ll notice the material choices and ergonomic solutions that accumulate into daily satisfaction. This isn’t a vehicle for people still trying to prove something.

If you want sharp handling, the BMW X3 will engage you more directly. If you want the most advanced hybrid technology, the Lexus NX deserves serious consideration. If you want Scandinavian minimalism, the Volvo XC60 delivers that aesthetic more purely. The Q5 Prestige targets those who want competence across all dimensions rather than excellence in any single one, those who value the cumulative effect of many good decisions over a few dramatic gestures.

Design Verdict

Audi has chosen evolution over revolution with this third-generation Q5, and the choice reflects confidence in the existing formula rather than desperation to change perception, the design improvements real but subtle in ways that require time to appreciate fully, better proportions becoming apparent only when parked beside the previous generation, more honest details revealing themselves only to those who look closely at exhaust outlets and lighting signatures and panel fit, richer interior materials rewarding touch rather than just sight, more advanced technology integrated more thoughtfully into an architecture that anticipates where drivers will look and reach rather than simply adding screens to surfaces that accommodate them.

I think the Q5 makes one of the stronger cases in this segment for quiet competence over dramatic gesture. Whether that philosophy connects depends on what buyers seek.

The post 2025 Audi Q5 TFSI quattro Prestige Review: Evolution as a Design Strategy first appeared on Yanko Design.

Lexus LX 700h Overtrail Review: Overbuilt for the Road and That’s the Point

PROS:


  • Highway composure rivals luxury sedans despite off-road tires

  • Seats built for hours, not just showroom impressions

  • Hybrid torque smooths every merge and grade effortlessly

  • Genuine off-road hardware never compromises daily driving

  • Restrained design reduces visual bulk without losing presence

CONS:


  • Dual-screen infotainment takes time to internalize

  • Third row remains tight for adult passengers

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The capability you'll never use shapes every mile you actually drive.

I spent a week with the 2025 Lexus LX 700h Overtrail on a family road trip. Not crawling over rocks. Not testing approach angles. Just driving, for hours, across highways and through small towns with my family loaded in.

Designer: Lexus

The Overtrail package is engineered for terrain I never touched. Electronically locking front and rear differentials. A torsen center diff. 33-inch all-terrain tires mounted on 18-inch wheels. Multi-Terrain Select with crawl control and downhill assist. Lexus built this thing to climb, descend, and articulate through conditions that would strand most luxury SUVs.

I used it to pick up coffee and cover 400 miles of interstate.

That disconnect sounds like a waste. It isn’t. The Overtrail’s capability translates into something unexpected on pavement: confidence that borders on calm.

Design Intent: Restraint Over Spectacle

Most off-road trims exaggerate aggression. Overtrail does the opposite. It reads like industrial equipment that happens to be finished well.

My tester arrived in Desert Moon Beige, a color that does real design work. In overcast light, it leans neutral and slightly cool. In direct sun, it warms without becoming flashy. There’s no metallic sparkle, no high-contrast drama. The finish behaves like a muted architectural surface, and that restraint helps the LX feel calmer and less imposing despite its size. For a vehicle this large, color choice matters more than most buyers realize. Desert Moon Beige actively reduces perceived bulk.

The Overtrail-specific dark spindle grille anchors the front fascia with no chrome and no bright interruptions. Horizontal slat density visually lowers the nose and widens the stance. The black surround ties directly into lower cladding and wheel arch trim, creating a continuous dark band that grounds the vehicle from every angle. Headlights sit high and slim, emphasizing width rather than height. The LED signature reads clean and controlled, not aggressive.

Wheel choice plays a bigger role than it first appears. The 18-inch black wheels with tall all-terrain sidewalls visually compress the body and soften the stance. That extra tire volume signals off-road intent, but it also calms the design. Larger wheels would have sharpened the edges and made the LX feel top-heavy. Instead, Overtrail looks grounded and planted, even parked. Tire tread is visible but not visually loud. Capable at rest, quiet in motion.

My vehicle included two options worth noting. Black side steps visually lower the body line and materially improve daily usability, making entry and exit easier on a family road trip without making the vehicle look less capable. A roof rack subtly changes the silhouette and adds a hint of expedition intent, but it remains proportionally integrated and introduces no visual clutter or noticeable wind noise. Both are optional, not standard, and both reinforce the configured nature of this specific vehicle.

Nothing about Overtrail pretends to be lightweight or sporty. The surfaces are thick. Panel gaps look engineered for durability, not minimized for show. It feels designed to survive abrasion, dust, and neglect without losing its identity. In this exact configuration, the LX 700h Overtrail looks intentional, grounded, and restrained. It doesn’t read as an off-road costume. It reads as a long-distance vehicle that happens to be engineered far beyond what most daily driving demands. That material honesty carries into the cabin.

Cabin Design: Luxury Filtered Through Utility

Inside, Overtrail prioritizes clarity, durability, and spatial calm. These qualities become obvious after hours behind the wheel.

The seats deserve specific credit. Cushions are broad and upright, with a firmness that supports posture rather than sinking you in. On a road trip, this matters more than initial plushness. Hours in, fatigue stays low. Lexus tuned these seats for sustained comfort, not showroom softness.

Material choices reinforce that goal. Leather surfaces feel resilient rather than delicate. Trim finishes avoid gloss in favor of textures that diffuse light. In changing daylight conditions, the cabin stays visually quiet. No glare. No sparkle. That reduces cognitive load on long highway stretches.

The dual-screen layout finally makes sense in this context. The upper 12.3-inch display handles navigation and media without feeling crowded. The lower 7-inch screen anchors climate and vehicle functions in a fixed visual zone. This separation reduces hunting for controls. Muscle memory builds quickly when you’re driving for hours rather than minutes.

Physical controls deserve credit. Knobs and buttons for key functions feel deliberate and weighted. Lexus resisted the urge to bury everything in menus, and that restraint pays off when you’re adjusting climate or audio repeatedly during a 6-hour drive.

Powertrain: Hybrid Torque Without Drama

The 3.4-liter twin-turbo V6 hybrid pairs with a high-torque electric motor and 10-speed automatic. Output reaches 457 horsepower and 583 pound-feet of torque, significantly more twist than the non-hybrid LX600.

On paper, those numbers suggest performance ambitions. In practice, the hybrid system plays a subtler role. It smooths transitions and fills gaps rather than announcing itself.

Throttle response feels immediate without being jumpy. Low-speed acceleration is effortless, especially when merging or climbing grades. The electric assist masks turbo lag and prevents the drivetrain from feeling strained under load. At highway speeds, the LX settles into a relaxed cruising rhythm. Engine noise stays muted. Gear changes are unobtrusive.

The vehicle never feels confused about its identity. Power delivery remains linear and confident, reinforcing the sense that this is a long-distance machine. EPA ratings land at 19 city, 22 highway, and 20 combined. Real-world highway testing shows around 20 mpg on premium fuel. The roughly 22-gallon fuel tank helps offset the hybrid system’s modest efficiency gains, though range still trails some non-hybrid rivals due to weight and tire choice. Off-road tire fitment can drop economy nearer to 13 mpg in demanding conditions. For my highway-heavy week, fuel stops came more often than expected but never felt punishing.

Ride Quality: The Overtrail Surprise

This is where the experience becomes genuinely interesting.

Despite the aggressive tire and suspension setup, the LX 700h Overtrail rides with unexpected composure on the highway. No constant jiggle. No nervous vertical motion. Expansion joints and uneven pavement are absorbed with a controlled, damped response rather than sharp impacts.

The tall sidewalls do significant work here, but suspension tuning deserves equal credit. Lexus prioritized body control over stiffness. The vehicle settles quickly after bumps, maintaining a sense of mass without sluggishness. It doesn’t float, but it doesn’t punish either.

At highway speeds, the cabin remains impressively insulated. Tire noise is present but subdued, more of a distant texture than a distraction. Wind noise stays low, even around the mirrors and A-pillars. That achievement isn’t trivial given the LX’s frontal area.

Long stretches reveal another strength. The ride stays consistent over time. Some off-road oriented vehicles feel fine initially, then wear you down. Overtrail maintains its composure. After hours, it still feels predictable and settled.

Steering and Control: Calm Over Sharpness

Steering feel aligns with the rest of the design philosophy. It isn’t sporty, but it’s precise enough to inspire confidence.

On-center stability is strong, which reduces constant micro-corrections on the highway. The wheel weights up naturally at speed, reinforcing a sense of control rather than urgency.

In corners, the LX reminds you of its 6,000-plus pounds. But it manages weight transfer gracefully. No sudden lean. No delayed response. Everything happens predictably. That predictability becomes a form of comfort on long drives.

Driver assistance systems stay mostly out of the way. Lane keeping and adaptive cruise work quietly in the background without aggressive corrections. That restraint fits the Overtrail personality. The vehicle supports the driver rather than competing for attention.

The Off-Road Hardware You May Never Use

The Overtrail package isn’t cosmetic. The hardware is real.

Front and rear electronically locking differentials provide genuine capability. The torsen center diff, front skid plate, and 33-inch all-terrain tires on 18-inch wheels add articulation and low-speed control that matter on dirt and rock. Multi-Terrain Select, crawl control, and downhill assist mean Lexus built systems for conditions most owners will never encounter.

Physical buttons for drive modes make it both automatic point-and-shoot capable and manually configurable for serious terrain. Reviewers who have tested Overtrail in off-road conditions confirm it performs. I simply chose not to.

That choice reveals the real achievement. Lexus engineered an off-road package that doesn’t dominate the on-road experience. The hardware adds capability without injecting harshness, noise, or visual chaos into daily use.

What Lexus Got Right and What They Didn’t

The interior craftsmanship is excellent. High-end materials and supportive seats make long drives comfortable. Physical controls for essential functions feel deliberate and earned. Safety technology is plentiful.

The digital user experience is less cohesive. The dual-screen infotainment can feel disjointed and layered in ways that take time to internalize. Some competitors offer more advanced hands-free driver assistance. Cargo space is modest with the third row up, though it grows significantly when folded. The third row itself is tight for adults.

At six-figure pricing, starting around $114,500 to $119,000 before options, some buyers may expect interior richness that matches or exceeds European benchmarks. Lexus delivers refinement and durability, but the cabin doesn’t scream opulence. It whispers capability.

The Design Takeaway

The LX 700h Overtrail is not an off-road cosplay vehicle that sacrifices road comfort. It’s a long-distance luxury SUV that happens to be overbuilt for terrain you may never touch.

From a design perspective, that’s the real achievement. Ruggedness doesn’t need to announce itself loudly. Sometimes the most confident design choice is letting capability exist quietly beneath the surface.

I drove it across states with my family. The off-road hardware sat unused, but its presence shaped everything about how the vehicle behaved. The mass felt intentional. The composure felt earned. The confidence felt deserved.

For buyers who want genuine capability without the aesthetic compromise, Overtrail makes a compelling argument. You’re paying for engineering that may never be tested, but you feel it every mile anyway.

Price: Starting at $114,500 (Overtrail trim)

Powertrain: 3.4L twin-turbo V6 hybrid, 457 hp, 583 lb-ft

Fuel Economy: 19 city / 22 highway / 20 combined (EPA)

Key Features: Electronically locking front/rear differentials, 33-inch all-terrain tires, Multi-Terrain Select, adaptive suspension, dual-screen infotainment with physical controls

The post Lexus LX 700h Overtrail Review: Overbuilt for the Road and That’s the Point first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Dial That Swallowed the Watch

Most dive watches announce themselves through function: rotating bezels, legible numerals, confidence-inspiring depth ratings. The Nereide Opale acknowledges all of that, then pivots. Venezianico constructed a 200-meter tool watch with a tungsten bezel and Swiss automatic movement, but none of those details survive first contact. The dial dominates. Blue shifts to green shifts to purple shifts to pink as the wrist rotates, a geometric light show housed in familiar steel.

Designer: Nereide Opale

The design bet is specific. Venezianico assumes a buyer who already owns the matte-dial diver, the heritage reissue, the affordable Swiss workhorse. This watch exists for the collector who wants to break the pattern, to own something that photographs like nothing else in the box.

Kyocera’s Controlled Chaos

Natural opal presents challenges for production watchmaking. According to the Gemological Institute of America, high heat or sudden temperature changes can fracture opal and cause crazing, a network of fine cracks that destroys the stone’s visual appeal. Add the inconsistency of natural specimens, where one piece might display dramatic fire and the next a muddy gray, and the material becomes impractical for a 500-piece limited run. Venezianico needed opal’s visual effect without the gemstone’s vulnerabilities.

Kyocera, the Japanese ceramics company, developed an alternative decades ago. Their lab-grown material reproduces the layered internal structure that creates opal’s color play: light enters, bounces between microscopic layers, and exits as a spectrum of shifting hues. The composition, 80 percent silica and 20 percent clear resin according to Venezianico’s specifications, yields a dial plate stable enough to machine cleanly and survive the thermal cycles a dive watch encounters.

The result reads differently than natural stone. Where a mined opal might show soft, nebulous color zones, the Kyocera material presents sharper facets, more crystalline geometry. The rainbow effect is more deliberate, more designed. Some buyers will prefer the organic randomness of natural opal. Others will appreciate that each of the 500 Nereide Opale dials carries unique patterning without the lottery of stone selection.

Practical concerns disappear. The dial survives the thermal cycles a dive watch encounters. It accepts the date aperture at three without cracking. And Venezianico can promise visual consistency across a limited run, something impossible with harvested material.

Steel as Stage

Every design decision surrounding the dial serves a single purpose: stay neutral. The 42mm case wears a mix of brushed flanks and polished bevels, the standard dive-watch treatment, but entirely in silvered steel. The five-link Sansovino bracelet continues the theme: metallic, reflective, monochrome. No color. No contrast. No competition.

The hands required particular care. Venezianico chose an obelisk profile, tapering to a point, finished in mirror polish. Against the shifting opal, they occasionally catch light and flash, but they never anchor the eye. Applied baton hour markers follow the same logic: minimal, metallic, filled with Super-LumiNova for low-light legibility but invisible against the dial’s daytime performance.

Typography stays restrained. The applied cross logo at twelve uses the same polished metal as the hands. The date window at three sits in a polished frame that matches the logo. A colored date wheel, a contrasting brand name, any additional detail would fracture the opal’s dominance. Venezianico understood this and resisted.

The overall effect is a watch that reads as a single material statement. Steel holds the opal. Opal performs. Everything else recedes.

Tungsten as Anchor

The bezel insert breaks the monochrome, but only in value, not hue. Tungsten’s deep gray sits between bright steel and the kaleidoscopic dial, a tonal step-down that prevents the transition from feeling jarring. The material choice is also functional: tungsten rates 9 on the Mohs hardness scale against stainless steel’s 5, making the rotating bezel highly scratch resistant in normal daily wear.

The 60-minute dive scale, the lume pip at twelve, the coin edge for grip: none of this is novel. But tungsten elevates familiar geometry. The material carries literal weight, densifying the watch’s top half, and perceptual weight, grounding a piece that might otherwise feel purely decorative.

The Workhorse Inside

Venezianico selected the Sellita SW200-1, the Swiss automatic that powers divers from Christopher Ward to Marathon to Unimatic. The 4Hz beat rate represents proven reliability, not innovation. Power reserve figures vary across coverage, with some outlets reporting 38 hours and others 41, and Venezianico’s official spec sheet omits the number entirely. Expect something in that range. The movement answers mechanical questions without drama, leaving the dial to carry the conversation.

Through the exhibition caseback, a customized rotor appears with radial Côtes de Genève finishing, a gesture toward decoration that stops short of competing with the front side. The rotor treatment suggests care without demanding attention, exactly the balance the watch needs.

The movement choice anchors value. At 1,395 USD (1,295 EUR), the Nereide Opale occupies the same price bracket as competitors using conventional dials. The Kyocera opal and tungsten bezel represent material upgrades at cost parity, the kind of calculation that rewards enthusiasts who know what they are giving up (nothing) and what they are gaining (a dial that behaves like no other in the segment).

Five Hundred Pieces, One Specific Buyer

Venezianico caps production at 500 numbered examples, with preorders opening December 24. The exact time varies by source: Venezianico’s communications indicate 3:00 PM GMT+1, while at least one outlet reports 2:00 PM GMT. If timing matters to you, confirm directly on Venezianico’s signup page before the window opens. The scarcity is real but modest: enough to create urgency, not so limited that secondary market access disappears entirely.

The tension in this watch is deliberate. Dive watches earned their reputation through legibility and durability, through being tools that happen to look good. The Nereide Opale inverts the formula: it is a visual object that happens to function as a tool. The 200-meter rating is real. The tungsten bezel will survive years of daily wear. The SW200-1 will keep time reliably. But none of that is why someone buys this watch.

The buyer profile is narrow. Collectors seeking another black-dial diver will find nothing here. Those who treat watches as mechanical jewelry, as objects that reward attention, will find a dial that changes with every movement, backed by engineering that does not apologize for the spectacle.

Venezianico’s bet is straightforward: a dial material can carry a watch in a market saturated with homages and heritage plays. The Nereide Opale stakes everything on that slab of lab-grown stone. The case, the bracelet, the bezel, the movement: all of it exists to frame the opal and let the color do the work.

The post The Dial That Swallowed the Watch first appeared on Yanko Design.

2025 Volkswagen Golf GTI Review: Car of the Year


PROS:


  • Exceptionally balanced chassis favors control over spectacle

  • Clark Plaid seating blends comfort, grip, and heritage

  • Torque rich powerband rewards real world driving

  • Daily usability achieved without sacrificing design intent

  • Restraint driven design feels complete and confident

CONS:


  • Touch sensitive controls reduce tactile certainty

  • Front wheel drive limits ultimate track theatrics

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The GTI wins not by doing more, but by knowing when to stop.
award-icon

Forty years into its production run, the Volkswagen Golf GTI faces a question most performance cars never survive long enough to answer: what happens when the formula is complete? The 2025 model responds not with reinvention but with refinement so deliberate it borders on philosophical. Look at the grille: a single red line, unbroken, tracing the car’s width before disappearing into the headlight housings. No additional accent. No secondary flourish. That line is the thesis statement. Where competitors chase headline numbers and aggressive styling cues, the GTI presents something rarer in automotive design: the confidence to stop adding.

The exterior reads as studied understatement. Body lines remain clean, uninterrupted by vents or scoops that would suggest performance requiring constant explanation. The silhouette sits low without crouching, planted without posturing. In Alpine Silver Metallic, our test vehicle demonstrated how surface finish interacts with the car’s subtle curves, catching light across hood creases that reveal themselves gradually rather than announcing their presence.

Material Language

Inside, the cabin architecture prioritizes tactile hierarchy over visual spectacle. The flat-bottom steering wheel occupies the central position in this material conversation, wrapped in leather that wears smooth at the nine-and-three positions within the first few hundred miles of use. Stainless steel pedals catch light from the footwell, their brushed finish contrasting with the matte black plastic surrounds. Red ambient lighting threads through the dashboard at night, the only concession to interior theater.

The Clark Plaid seats deserve separate consideration. This textile pattern has appeared in every GTI generation since 1976, and its persistence represents something beyond brand consistency. The weave itself tells a story about Volkswagen’s understanding of what performance seating actually requires: grip during lateral loading, breathability across temperature changes, durability that improves rather than degrades with use. Bolster foam density sits firmer than typical sport cloth, shaped to contain rather than squeeze the occupant. The fabric’s black and gray threads intersect at angles that catch cabin light differently depending on sun position, creating visual movement even when the car sits still. After a four-hour highway stint from Dallas to Austin, the seats demonstrated no pressure point fatigue, a claim many leather-wrapped alternatives cannot make. This is functional heritage, not nostalgia. The plaid works because the problem it solves has not changed.

Dual 10.25-inch displays span the dashboard width, their bezels thin enough to suggest a single continuous surface interrupted only by the steering column. Touch-sensitive sliders for climate and volume occupy positions along the center console where physical controls once lived. This represents the GTI’s single visible concession to interface trends over tactile tradition, a trade that prioritizes visual continuity at a modest ergonomic cost. The adjustment period is real but brief.

Chassis Philosophy

The mechanical architecture beneath reveals Volkswagen’s approach to performance engineering. The 2.0-liter EA888 engine produces 241 horsepower and 273 pound-feet of torque, figures that appear conservative against current competition. These numbers obscure the delivery character. Torque arrives at 1,600 rpm and sustains through 4,300 rpm, creating a powerband that rewards partial throttle exploration rather than demanding full commitment.

Our test vehicle carried the seven-speed DSG dual-clutch transmission, a choice that alters the car’s personality without diminishing it. Upshifts compress into moments brief enough to feel like hesitations rather than events. Downshifts arrive with rev-matching that sounds intentional, the exhaust note rising through an acoustic signature tuned to communicate engagement without theater.

The VAQ electronic limited-slip differential manages front-wheel traction with intervention subtle enough to require attention to notice. Corner exit acceleration produces no wheel scrabble, no steering correction, no sense of mechanical systems working to contain mechanical excess. The differential’s operation suggests integration rather than intervention, a chassis behaving as a single coordinated system rather than independent components managed by software.

Dynamic Chassis Control adaptive dampers present a genuine choice rather than a marketing checkbox. Comfort mode absorbs expansion joints and surface imperfections with compliance that transforms the GTI into a credible highway cruiser. Sport mode firms the response enough to communicate surface texture through the steering rim and seat cushion. Steering weight builds progressively from center, carrying none of the artificial resistance that plagues many electronically assisted systems. Brake pedal travel follows the same logic: firm initial resistance, progressive bite, linear relationship between input and outcome. The spread between these settings covers sufficient range that drivers will likely settle into a preference rather than toggle constantly. These are not remarkable specifications. They are evidence of calibration discipline.

The Architecture of Usefulness

The hatchback form factor delivers practicality the GTI’s sedan competitors cannot match. Rear cargo volume expands from 22.8 cubic feet with seats upright to 52.7 cubic feet with the rear bench folded, the rear seatbacks folding via a single pull lever that releases with satisfying mechanical precision. The load floor sits level with the rear bumper height, its carpeted surface firm enough to slide boxes across without catching. This utility exists without visual compromise, the roofline maintaining its sporting rake while enclosing genuinely useful interior volume.

Rear passenger space accommodates adults across moderate distances. Legroom measures adequate for passengers under six feet, though knee contact with front seatbacks remains possible depending on front occupant positioning. Headroom proves more generous than the roofline suggests, the seating position dropping occupants low enough to clear the tapering roof glass.

The rear door apertures open wide enough for easy entry, their weatherstripping creating a soft thud on close that communicates build quality without conscious attention. Small storage solutions appear throughout: door pockets sized for water bottles, a center console bin deep enough for phones and wallets, map pockets behind the front seats. For a vehicle this compact, the packaging efficiency represents thoughtful spatial engineering.

The Value Proposition

At $33,860 as tested, the GTI positions itself not against the Civic Type R or GR Corolla but adjacent to them. This is strategic design territory. Volkswagen occupies the space where daily usability and driving engagement overlap, ceding the performance margins to competitors who build cars requiring accommodation. The Type R demands you rise to its level. The GR Corolla rewards commitment with drama. The GTI meets you where you already are.

2025 Toyota GR Corolla Premium Manual Review

The four-year bumper-to-bumper warranty and two years of included maintenance read as confidence in the object’s longevity, not as purchase incentives. This is the rarest positioning in contemporary automotive design: a performance car priced for accessibility that does not apologize for what it excludes. The GTI excludes excess. That exclusion is the product.

Resolution: Why This Is Our Car of the Year

The 2025 Golf GTI represents something increasingly rare in automotive design: a product that knows what it is and refuses to pretend otherwise. The chassis does not apologize for being front-wheel drive. The power figures do not strain toward competition with larger engines. The interior does not disguise its price point behind aggressive styling that overpromises.

What remains is a vehicle that executes its intended purpose with precision that approaches elegance. The hot hatch formula, refined across four decades, arrives here in what may be its final evolved form before electrification rewrites the category’s rules entirely. For drivers seeking performance that integrates into daily life rather than demanding accommodation from it, the GTI presents an argument for restraint that carries more conviction than any competitor’s argument for excess.

The 2025 Volkswagen Golf GTI is Yanko Design’s 2025 Car of the Year and earns our Editor’s Choice Award because it answers the question that matters: can a performance car be finished?

Yes. This is what finished looks like. Not the absence of ambition, but the presence of conviction. Volkswagen built the GTI they intended to build: complete, coherent, and resolved. In the final years before electrification rewrites every assumption about what a driver’s car can be, this is the closing argument for internal combustion restraint.

The award goes to the car that knew when to stop.

The post 2025 Volkswagen Golf GTI Review: Car of the Year first appeared on Yanko Design.