Tag Archives: Automotive design

2025 Lexus IS 500 F SPORT Performance Review: Designing Space for a V8 in an Electrified World

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Linear V8 response - Naturally aspirated powertrain delivers tactile throttle connection

  • Rear wheel drive architecture - Traditional chassis balance in an AWD-dominated segment

  • Cohesive visual identity - Flare Yellow package unifies exterior and interior design

  • Mechanical limited slip - Torsen differential enhances predictable corner exits

  • Daily performance tuning - Comfort-biased chassis suits real-world use

CONS:


  • Dated infotainment - Interface feels a generation behind modern rivals

  • Fuel economy penalty - Significant consumption costs for daily driving

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

An unapologetic design preserves mechanical joy while others chase efficiency.

Flare Yellow bodywork catches parking garage fluorescents like a warning flare. Quad exhaust tips broadcast displacement before you turn the key. The 2025 Lexus IS 500 F SPORT Performance Premium arrives unapologetic while most luxury sedans in 2025 spend their energy explaining away downsized engines and turbocharger compromises. In a market segment that has largely abandoned both of those choices, this combination reads less like a product strategy and more like a design philosophy made physical. The sedan occupies a strange position: compact luxury dimensions wrapped around powertrain architecture that most competitors retired years ago. That tension between contemporary shell and analog holdout defines every interaction with the car, from the first ignition cycle to the hundredth highway merge.

Designer: Lexus

Flare Yellow is not simply a paint option here. Lexus positions it as a complete appearance system, bundling 19 inch black forged alloy wheels, Ultrasuede interior inserts with yellow stitching, matching seatbelts, illuminated door sills, and coordinated floor mats. The color becomes a unifying thread that connects exterior surfacing to cabin touchpoints, transforming what could be a single aesthetic choice into an integrated material language. At $4,050 for the package, the investment purchases coherence rather than mere visibility.

Exterior Form Language

Aggression arrives through geometry rather than applied decoration. The spindle grille dominates the frontal view, its lattice pattern creating depth and shadow that shifts with viewing angle and ambient light. Triple beam LED headlamps flank the grille, their layered optical elements suggesting technical complexity even at rest. The overall stance sits low and wide, with wheel arches that fill their openings without the exaggerated flaring that characterizes some performance variants.

Moving rearward, the roofline descends in a continuous arc that terminates at a ducktail spoiler integrated into the trunk lid. Quad exhaust tips emerge from the rear diffuser, their stacked arrangement serving as the primary visual signal of the V8 beneath. The proportion relationship between greenhouse and body mass reads as deliberately compact, the cabin volume compressed relative to the sculptural surfaces surrounding it. This creates the impression of a machine built around its mechanical core rather than a passenger compartment with propulsion attached. The 19 inch wheels and aggressive fender surfacing work to visually manage nearly 4,000 pounds, making the car read lighter and wider than the scales suggest.

Interior Material Hierarchy

Inside, tactile engagement takes priority over digital spectacle. NuLuxe trimmed seats provide the primary contact surface, their bolstering firm enough to communicate sport intent without creating discomfort during extended use. The Ultrasuede inserts in the Flare Yellow package introduce texture variation that catches fingertips differently than the surrounding synthetic leather, establishing a sensory hierarchy across the seating surfaces.

The steering wheel arrives wrapped in leather with a heated element, its rim diameter and grip circumference calibrated for hands that expect direct mechanical feedback. Aluminum pedals replace the standard rubber units, their knurled surfaces providing positive purchase under aggressive inputs. Satin trim accents break up the interior darkness, creating visual rhythm without the reflective distraction of polished chrome.

The Mark Levinson audio system occupies the acoustic environment with authority. Its 17 speakers deliver the kind of spatial imaging that justifies the premium trim designation, filling the cabin with presence that matches the V8’s mechanical drama.

 

The interface through which that system operates represents the cabin’s most significant temporal artifact. A 10.3 inch touchscreen accepts finger input but also responds to a trackpad controller mounted on the center console, a legacy interface element that creates immediate friction. Reaching for the screen to tap a climate shortcut feels natural until you remember the trackpad exists; defaulting to the trackpad means dragging a cursor across a surface designed for touch. Two design eras compete on the same console, and neither fully wins.

Powertrain as Sensory Design

Numbers tell part of the story: 472 horsepower at 7,100 rpm from a 5.0 liter V8. What matters more is how that power arrives. Natural aspiration means throttle response arrives without the intervention of turbocharger spool, creating a direct relationship between pedal position and acoustic output. The engine announces its presence through a broadband exhaust note that builds intensity with engine speed, the quad tips providing the exit path for a sound that functions as the car’s primary experiential feature.

The sprint to 60 arrives in the mid four second range, figures that place the IS 500 behind several turbocharged competitors on paper. The gap narrows in lived experience because the V8 delivers its power in a linear curve rather than a turbocharged surge, allowing the driver to modulate output with precision that boost dependent systems struggle to match. The eight speed automatic transmission shifts cleanly in sport mode, though it lacks the dual clutch immediacy that defines the segment’s sharper offerings.

Rear wheel drive completes the mechanical architecture, a configuration increasingly rare in this segment where all wheel drive has become the default assumption. The Torsen limited slip differential, a helical gear system that transfers torque mechanically rather than through electronic intervention, manages power distribution to the rear axle. Its purely mechanical operation provides predictable behavior at the adhesion limit, sending power to whichever wheel has grip without the response lag of clutch pack systems. Exiting a tight corner under throttle, the result is smooth, progressive traction rather than the sudden electronic clamp of stability nannies fighting for control. Adaptive suspension and upgraded brakes with enhanced cooling address the chassis requirements of the additional powertrain mass, though these systems tune toward comfort rather than track aggression.

Dynamic Compromise

Nearly 4,000 pounds announces itself the moment the road curves. The IS 500 weighs approximately 3,973 pounds in tested configuration, mass that reveals its presence during direction changes and hard braking. Push beyond street driving limits and understeer arrives predictably, the front tires reaching their grip threshold before the rear can rotate the chassis. The steering provides adequate weight but filters road texture in ways that prioritize refinement over information density. These are characteristics of a car tuned for daily use rather than weekend autocross, a calibration choice that aligns with the comfort of the seats and the isolation of the cabin.

The brake pedal requires calibration of expectations, its initial travel soft before building resistance. This tuning prioritizes smoothness during traffic deceleration but reduces confidence during aggressive threshold braking. Stability control intervention arrives earlier than competitors allow, limiting the exploration of chassis dynamics even when the driver seeks that engagement.

On a fast two lane road at seven tenths, the character clarifies. The V8 pulls cleanly out of corners while the chassis absorbs mid corner bumps that would unsettle lighter, stiffer competitors. Push harder and the front washes wide, but within the envelope of spirited street driving, the balance feels deliberate rather than deficient.

These compromises reflect a deliberate design decision: Lexus tuned for the commute, not the canyon. That calibration disappoints enthusiasts seeking sharper responses but serves the owner who wants to live with a V8 daily. The IS 500 prioritizes living with the V8 rather than extracting its maximum potential, a choice that makes the powertrain accessible across driving contexts rather than demanding specific conditions for enjoyment.

Value Positioning and Market Context

At $69,539 as tested, including destination and the Flare Yellow appearance package, the IS 500 positions itself against both four cylinder luxury sedans and more focused performance machinery. The competitive landscape has shifted around this car: BMW offers turbocharged inline sixes, Mercedes deploys electrified four cylinders, and Alfa Romeo provides sharper dynamics at similar price points. Against this field, the IS 500 competes on differentiation rather than specification superiority.

Fuel economy penalties are explicit and substantial. The EPA rates the powertrain at 17 mpg city, 25 highway, and 20 combined, figures that translate to approximately $3,200 in annual fuel costs. Over five years, that adds roughly $6,500 more than average. Environmental ratings land at 4 out of 10 for both fuel economy and smog, reflecting the consequences of maintaining natural aspiration while competitors optimize for regulatory compliance.

The value proposition depends on what the buyer prioritizes. Powertrain character over lap times. Exhaust note over efficiency. Mechanical simplicity over technological sophistication. For those criteria, the IS 500 delivers experiences its competitors have abandoned. The car exists because Lexus chose to preserve something rather than optimize everything.

Design Intent Realized

As a design object, the IS 500 F SPORT Performance Premium prioritizes a specific experience over balanced capability. The naturally aspirated V8 in rear wheel drive configuration represents a powertrain topology that market forces are eliminating, preserved here in a package refined enough for daily use. Flare Yellow demonstrates how color can function as a design element rather than a decorative choice, unifying interior and exterior into a coherent material statement.

Limitations and character prove inseparable. The weight that softens handling also supports the sound deadening that makes the V8 a companion rather than an assault. The infotainment system that frustrates also maintains the physical controls and clear hierarchy that digital native interfaces have abandoned. Fuel consumption that punishes the wallet finances the displacement that creates the acoustic experience.

Assembled in Tahara, Japan, the IS 500 wears a five star safety rating from NHTSA across all categories. It arrives as a complete product rather than a work in progress. Its design intent is preservation: holding space for a powertrain philosophy while the industry accelerates toward electrification. Whether that intent justifies the compromises depends on what the buyer believes is worth keeping alive. That Flare Yellow paint catching light in a parking garage announces the same thing the V8 announces at redline: this machine refused to apologize. For the driver who values mechanical tactility over interface novelty, the IS 500 answers a question the rest of the segment stopped asking.

The post 2025 Lexus IS 500 F SPORT Performance Review: Designing Space for a V8 in an Electrified World first appeared on Yanko Design.

2026 Toyota GR Supra MkV Final Edition Review: A Farewell Written in Carbon Fiber and Camber

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Refined chassis sharpens every driver input

  • Larger Brembo brakes resist fade confidently

  • Distinctive silhouette will age gracefully

  • Manual transmission available for enthusiasts

  • Premium Alcantara and leather interior

CONS:


  • No Android Auto connectivity

  • Limited cargo space and rear visibility

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The most resolved Supra of this generation, built entirely for feel over flash.

The fifth-generation Toyota Supra has always carried the weight of resurrection, a nameplate revived after two decades of dormancy and built on a platform shared with BMW’s Z4. That partnership invited scrutiny from the beginning, with purists questioning whether the A90 could truly claim the Supra lineage when its heart beat with Bavarian engineering. Toyota’s response, refined across six model years, culminates in the MkV Final Edition: not a reinvention but a declaration that the conversation about authenticity matters less than the conversation about intent. The Final Edition does not chase new power figures or revolutionary technology. It chases feel, that elusive quality that separates cars people admire from cars people remember.

Designer: Toyota

Gazoo Racing’s philosophy has always emphasized the tactile over the theoretical, and this swan song embodies that principle with unusual clarity. Where competitors announce their final editions with horsepower increases and cosmetic packages, Toyota chose to invest in the parts that shape how the car communicates with its driver: bushings, braces, damper calibration, brake sizing. The engineering focus speaks to a different understanding of what makes a sports car meaningful. Numbers translate poorly to memory. The sensation of a chassis rotating precisely at the limit, the confidence of brakes that refuse to fade, the subtle feedback through a steering wheel that actually tells you something: these are the currencies that matter when the production line goes quiet.

The price positions the Final Edition in the upper 60s before destination, typically just over 70k as equipped, placing it firmly in the territory where a Porsche Cayman or BMW M2 becomes a reasonable cross-shop. That positioning is intentional. Toyota is not asking buyers to choose the Supra because it costs less or offers more features per dollar. The ask is simpler and more demanding: choose it because this is the most resolved version of a car that has spent six years learning how to be itself. I spent a week with the Final Edition, and that confidence comes through every time you turn the key.

Exterior Form Language

Few sports car silhouettes remain as distinctive as the GR Supra’s, a profile defined by the exaggerated length of its hood relative to the compact cabin and truncated tail. That proportion traces directly to the classic front-engine, rear-drive formula, but the execution here pushes further into sculptural territory than most modern interpretations. A double-bubble roof, functional in its origins as a nod to helmet clearance but now a visual signature, creates a centerline interruption that breaks what could have been a simple coupe arc into something more complex. Light catches the roof differently at every angle, revealing the depth of the sculpting work that photographs rarely capture.

The Final Edition adds visual weight through functional aero components that subtly alter the car’s stance without abandoning the base design’s intent. In person, the carbon ducktail changes the whole rear three-quarter view. A carbon fiber ducktail spoiler extends the rear deck with a lip that follows the body’s natural curvature rather than imposing an aggressive aftermarket aesthetic. Front wheel arch flaps and taller tire spats address airflow management at higher speeds, but their visual effect is equally significant: they emphasize the muscular fender bulges that have always been the Supra’s most overtly athletic element. The matte black 19-inch wheels specific to this trim level darken the car’s overall presence, pulling attention toward the body surfaces rather than the brightwork. That darkening strategy continues with available carbon mirror caps and the optional GT4 appearance package, which introduces matte paint finishes like Burnout and Undercover that transform surface reflections into something closer to fabric than glass. The lighting signature carries forward unchanged from previous model years, with the narrow headlamp clusters and integrated LED running lights that give the Supra its focused, almost predatory forward gaze. Rear lighting uses a full-width bar that connects the tail lamps and creates visual width when viewed from behind. The decision to keep lighting elements consistent with the broader Supra range rather than creating Final Edition-specific graphics reflects Toyota’s restraint. This is a car closing a chapter, not a special edition screaming for attention.

Surfacing across the body panels demonstrates the kind of complexity that requires time to appreciate. The door skins carry compound curves that transition from convex to concave as they approach the rockers, creating shadow lines that change character depending on the sun angle. Fender tops pull upward from the hood line with enough volume to be visible from the driver’s seat, a design choice that deliberately references the original A80 Supra’s visual cues. The hood itself stretches forward with a slight power dome that interrupts what would otherwise be a simple convex surface, adding muscularity without resorting to the aggressive venting common in performance car design.

Where the Supra’s form language succeeds most convincingly is in its refusal to chase visual aggression for its own sake. Many competitors in this price bracket layer on ducts, vents, wings, and diffusers that announce performance intent through visual noise. The GR Supra communicates through proportion and surface, trusting that buyers who appreciate the engineering beneath will also appreciate the design discipline above. I think it is one of the better looking sports cars you can buy right now, and it will age better than most of its rivals.

Interior Architecture

Cabin architecture establishes its priorities the moment the door swings open, presenting a cockpit organized around the driver with almost aggressive single-mindedness. Seat positioning sits low, with the hip point closer to the floor than most modern sports cars permit, creating the sensation of sitting in the car rather than on it. A relatively high door line and the upward sweep of the dashboard combine with that low seating to produce an environment that feels enclosed without claustrophobia, like a well-fitted helmet rather than a restrictive space. The center console rises between driver and passenger, creating both physical and psychological separation that reinforces the driver-focused intent. This is not a car designed for conversation during spirited driving.

The Final Edition’s interior trim elevates the cabin through Alcantara and leather surfaces with red contrast stitching and GR branding integrated into the headrests and door panels. That red accent strategy walks a careful line: visible enough to communicate the special edition status, restrained enough to avoid the boy-racer look that aggressive color blocking can create. Alcantara appears on high-contact areas where grip matters, and the texture variation it brings is welcome. Leather covers the surfaces where durability and easy cleaning take priority. The combination feels deliberate rather than decorated.

Spatial logic within the cabin follows the classic sports car compromise: adequate space for two adults, minimal accommodation for anything else. The 10.2 cubic feet of cargo behind the seats accepts weekend bags or a set of helmets, but the hatchback opening limits practical access compared with a traditional trunk. I fit a carry-on and a camera bag back there without much fuss. Seat adjustment range accommodates a reasonable spread of body types, though taller drivers may find the roof proximity notable, particularly with the double-bubble sculpting pressing down at the head area. The passenger seat offers less adjustment range, an honest acknowledgment that this space exists primarily to transport someone occasionally rather than to provide equivalent comfort to the driver’s position. The instrument cluster positions directly ahead of the steering wheel in a binnacle that creates visual focus, while the center-mounted infotainment screen angles toward the driver with enough tilt to be visible without requiring a full head turn.

Ambient quality within the Final Edition cabin achieves a level of refinement that earlier A90 models sometimes missed. Panel gaps align with acceptable precision, door closure sounds carry the solid thunk that buyers at this price expect, and the overall assembly feel reflects the maturation that comes with late-production-run refinement. The JBL audio system fills the cabin with competent sound quality that neither embarrasses the car nor elevates it to audiophile territory. Road noise penetration remains higher than in grand touring competitors but lower than in track-focused machines, positioning the Supra appropriately for its dual-purpose character.

Control surface placement follows established conventions without innovation, which in this context reads as confidence rather than laziness. The steering wheel rim thickness and diameter feel appropriate for the car’s performance envelope. Paddle shifters, on automatic-equipped models, position within natural finger reach. Climate controls operate through physical buttons rather than touchscreen menus, a decision that becomes increasingly welcome as more manufacturers abandon tactile interfaces. The overall ergonomic impression suggests a cabin designed by people who drive rather than by people who design interfaces.

Material Composition

Material selection within the Final Edition demonstrates the kind of thoughtful approach that distinguishes serious sports cars from dressed-up economy platforms. The Alcantara carries enough weight to feel genuine rather than synthetic, and the stitching on the leather surfaces maintains consistent spacing throughout. Hard plastics appear in lower visibility areas, but their matte finishes prevent the cheap, shiny look that dates an interior. Carbon fiber trim matches the exterior pieces in weave and clear coat.

The steering wheel leather provides grip during hard cornering without needing aggressive perforation. The shift lever moves through its gate with the mechanical precision you want from a sports car. Climate control knobs click with appropriate resistance, and even the key fob has the right heft. These details matter more than they should, and the Final Edition gets most of them right.

 

Sound enters the cabin intentionally. Road surface changes come through the floor clearly enough to tell you about grip conditions. Wind noise picks up above highway speeds, a tradeoff for that slippery shape. The inline-six sounds smooth and present without needing artificial amplification through the speakers. This is a car that wants you engaged, not cocooned.

Technology Integration

The 8.8-inch infotainment display runs older BMW iDrive software that works fine without impressing anyone. Apple CarPlay handles smartphone connectivity, though Android Auto remains unavailable, a gap that stands out as the market has largely standardized around both. The central controller with shortcut buttons takes some learning but becomes efficient with use. Response time is adequate, and the screen resolution reflects the platform’s age without embarrassing the car.

The head-up display projects speed, navigation directions, and basic vehicle info onto the windshield where it belongs. Brightness adjusts automatically, and the information density stays reasonable during spirited driving. Taller drivers may find the projection sitting lower than ideal.

Driver assistance on automatic models includes adaptive cruise, lane departure warning, emergency braking, and blind spot monitoring. These systems work competently without the refined calibration of the best current implementations. The technology overall reflects a transitional moment: physical buttons for climate and common functions, which many buyers will appreciate, but less visual sophistication than competitors increasingly offer. The tech is fine. You are not buying this car for its infotainment.

Powertrain Character

The 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six produces 382 horsepower and 368 pound-feet of torque through a powerband that emphasizes breadth over peak drama. Torque arrives from 1,800 rpm and maintains presence across the usable range, eliminating the lag and surge that characterized earlier turbo applications and creating a delivery character that rewards varied driving styles. The engine note carries the mechanical smoothness inherent to inline-six architecture, with a refined exhaust sound that announces intent without the aggressive crackle and pop that some competitors employ. Power delivery feels linear and accessible, building predictably with throttle input rather than arriving in sudden bursts that complicate corner exit management.

Transmission choice between the six-speed manual and eight-speed automatic represents a philosophical decision as much as a practical one. The manual offers the engagement and control that enthusiasts prize, with a shift action that has improved across model years to provide shorter throws and more precise gate definition. The automatic matches revs competently during downshifts, executes ratio changes with appropriate speed during spirited driving, and proves unobtrusive during commuting duties. Toyota’s quoted acceleration times favor the automatic slightly, with 0-60 mph arriving in 3.9 seconds versus 4.2 seconds for the manual, though the differences in real-world driving feel less significant than benchmark testing suggests.

The Final Edition’s chassis improvements transform how the powertrain translates through the driving experience. The brake pedal firms up after a few hard stops rather than going soft, which builds confidence when you start pushing. Revised differential control maps improve traction deployment during corner exit, and you feel the rear step just a bit before the diff catches it rather than snapping into oversteer. The stronger front stabilizer bar and recalibrated adaptive dampers maintain body composure under the power application that the turbo six enables. These changes do not alter the powertrain’s fundamental character but refine how that character reaches you through the controls.

Daily Reality

Ownership experience with the GR Supra Final Edition confronts the compromises inherent to sports car design with varying degrees of success. The low seating position that creates driving involvement also complicates entry and exit, particularly in parking spaces where adjacent vehicles limit door swing. Visibility limitations from the small rear window and thick C-pillars require adjustment for drivers accustomed to more expansive glass areas, making parking lot navigation a conscious task rather than a casual one. The firm suspension tuning that provides communication and control on winding roads transmits surface imperfections with corresponding directness, making rough pavement a more present companion than luxury-oriented vehicles would permit.

Fuel economy according to manufacturer estimates reaches 22 mpg in city driving and 29 mpg on the highway, with a combined figure of 25 mpg that reflects the turbocharged six-cylinder’s efficiency when cruising and its appetite when pushed. Real-world numbers will vary with driving style, but the overall efficiency positions the Supra reasonably within its competitive set, neither punishing owners with sports car fuel bills nor pretending toward economy car frugality. Premium fuel requirements add to operating costs in a way that buyers at this price point typically accept as inherent to the category.

Reliability considerations for the Final Edition benefit from six years of production refinement and the BMW powertrain’s established service record in various applications. Early A90 models experienced some software and electronic issues that subsequent years addressed through updates and revisions. The mechanical components, including the engine, transmission, and differential, have demonstrated durability across the ownership community, with major failures remaining relatively uncommon in maintained examples. Service access through Toyota dealers provides convenience advantages over more exotic alternatives, though parts pricing for BMW-derived components can exceed expectations set by Toyota’s mainstream reputation. Warranty coverage follows Toyota’s standard terms, providing the assurance that comes with corporate backing during the initial ownership period.

Storage practicality remains the sports car compromise that no design can fully solve within this package’s constraints. The 10.2 cubic feet behind the seats accepts soft luggage or equipment bags, but the hatchback opening restricts the shapes and sizes that fit easily. The absence of a front trunk, common in mid-engine competitors, eliminates a supplementary storage option that some buyers might expect. Interior storage compartments provide adequate space for phones, wallets, and small items without offering the bins and cubbies that more practical vehicles include. The trunk floor sits high relative to the rear bumper, requiring a lift-over motion that larger or heavier items resist. Owners planning regular cargo duties will find the Final Edition uncooperative.

Competitive Context

Positioning against direct competitors reveals the Final Edition’s distinctive value proposition within a segment rich with alternatives. At approximately $63,000, the Porsche 718 Cayman offers mid-engine balance and the Porsche badge’s aspirational weight, but base models arrive with less power, while equivalently-equipped examples push beyond $80,000. Starting around $64,000, the BMW M2 shares platform architecture with the Supra but wears the M division’s identity, providing comparable performance with a different aesthetic philosophy and higher standard equipment levels. The Nissan Z presents a front-engine, rear-drive alternative at lower price points starting near $50,000, though with less refined chassis dynamics and a less developed interior environment.

Design differentiation within this competitive set reflects each manufacturer’s interpretation of sports car purpose. The Porsche approach emphasizes precision engineering expressed through minimalist design, with restrained surfaces and functional detailing that communicates seriousness without flamboyance. BMW’s M2 adopts a more aggressive stance, with widened bodywork and prominent air intakes that announce performance intent visually. The Nissan Z revives retro styling cues that connect to heritage models, creating emotional resonance through nostalgic reference. The GR Supra occupies a space between these approaches, modern in execution but proportionally classic, dramatic in silhouette but restrained in detailing.

Value assessment for the Final Edition depends heavily on buyer priorities and intended use. Those seeking maximum performance per dollar will find better acceleration numbers elsewhere. Those prioritizing interior luxury or technology features will find more comprehensive offerings at similar prices. Those wanting a daily driver with occasional sport driving will find more practical alternatives with comparable engagement. The Final Edition’s value proposition centers on something less quantifiable: the refinement of a platform that has spent six years developing its character, presented in the form Toyota believes represents its fullest expression. That refinement carries worth for buyers who understand what it represents and holds less meaning for those who prefer specification sheet comparison.

Who Should Buy This

The Final Edition makes the most sense for enthusiasts who already know they want a Supra and want the most sorted version Toyota will ever make. If you track your cars occasionally but mostly drive them on weekends, the chassis improvements and brake upgrade translate directly into confidence. If you care about owning something that will hold its value as a last-of-generation collectible, the limited production run and manual transmission availability help that case. If you need a daily driver that happens to be fun, the standard 3.0 or 3.0 Premium gets you most of the experience for less money. And if you cross-shop heavily on tech features or interior luxury, the Cayman and M2 offer more polish in those areas. The Final Edition is for people who prioritize how a car feels over what it offers on paper.

Design Verdict

The 2026 Toyota GR Supra MkV Final Edition represents a mature conclusion to a generation that arrived with controversy and departs with resolution. Toyota’s decision to invest the Final Edition’s development budget in chassis refinement rather than power increases or cosmetic drama reveals a design philosophy that prioritizes experience over specification. The car that results feels more complete than its predecessors, with the sharpened dynamics and improved braking confidence that track time and engineering iteration produce. Whether those improvements justify the price premium over standard models depends on the buyer’s sensitivity to the differences and the value they place on owning the definitive version of a platform reaching its end. The design choices, from the restrained exterior treatment to the driver-focused interior architecture to the material selections that emphasize quality over flash, communicate intentions clearly enough for interested buyers to evaluate alignment with their own priorities.

Longevity prospects for the Final Edition’s design suggest the kind of aging that rewards restraint. The absence of aggressive trend-chasing elements, the proportion-driven exterior language, the functional rather than decorative interior approach: these qualities tend to preserve relevance as years pass rather than dating the design to a specific moment. The limited production run adds collectability considerations that may influence future values, particularly for manual transmission examples in distinctive color combinations. Whether the GR Supra MkV will achieve the classic status of its A80 predecessor remains for time to determine. What the Final Edition demonstrates conclusively is that Toyota understood what made this generation worth building and chose to close its production run with the clearest expression of that understanding.

The post 2026 Toyota GR Supra MkV Final Edition Review: A Farewell Written in Carbon Fiber and Camber first appeared on Yanko Design.

Volvo XC60 T8 AWD Ultra Review: Scandinavian Calm in a Segment That Prefers to Shout

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Exceptional interior material quality – Nappa leather, open-pore wood, and real aluminum trim create a tactile experience that rivals vehicles costing significantly more

  • 455 hp with 32-35 miles of EV range – Strong plug-in hybrid performance covers daily commutes on electric power while delivering sports sedan acceleration when needed

  • Air suspension delivers outstanding ride comfort – The Ultra's adaptive suspension absorbs road imperfections while maintaining composed handling at highway speeds

  • Timeless Scandinavian design – Clean lines and understated styling will age gracefully, avoiding the dated look that trend-chasing designs often develop

  • Comprehensive standard equipment – Features like premium audio, advanced driver assistance, and the panoramic roof come included where competitors charge extra

CONS:


  • Infotainment requires too many menu taps – Basic functions like odometer readings are buried in the interface, and response times lag behind the best German systems

  • Premium pricing approaches $80k optioned – The T8 Ultra's as-tested price positions it against well-equipped German rivals with stronger brand prestige

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The XC60 T8 Ultra proves that restraint can be its own form of luxury. In a segment where everyone is shouting, Volvo built something worth listening to.

 

The luxury compact SUV segment has become an arms race of aggressive styling, oversized grilles, and angular creases that shout for attention. Volvo refuses to participate. The 2026 XC60 T8 AWD Ultra arrives as a deliberate counterpoint, a vehicle that communicates confidence through restraint rather than visual aggression. This is Scandinavian design philosophy made tangible: every surface, every proportion, every material choice serves a purpose beyond mere aesthetics. The result is a plug-in hybrid that feels like a quiet room in a noisy building. Where competitors deploy sharp edges and exaggerated haunches, Volvo deploys calm.

Designer: Volvo

The XC60 occupies an interesting position in automotive design language. It neither chases trends nor ignores them entirely. Instead, it filters contemporary expectations through a distinctly Nordic lens, one that values negative space as much as positive form. The T8 AWD Ultra represents the fullest expression of this philosophy, combining Volvo’s highest specification levels with a powertrain that delivers 455 horsepower while maintaining the ability to commute silently on electric power alone. This duality, performance capability wrapped in visual serenity, defines the vehicle’s character. The tension between these elements creates something more compelling than either would achieve independently.

What makes the XC60 significant from a design perspective extends beyond surface treatment. The vehicle represents a mature interpretation of what luxury means in an era of environmental awareness and digital saturation. Rather than adding complexity, Volvo has systematically removed it.

Exterior Form Language

The XC60’s silhouette reads as a refined two-box shape with short overhangs and an upright tail. This proportion feels deliberately conservative compared to the swooping fastbacks and coupe-like rooflines that dominate the segment. The shoulder line runs cleanly from the Thor’s Hammer headlights to the vertical taillights, creating visual length without dramatic surfacing. Wheels ranging from 20 to 21 inches fill the arches appropriately without overwhelming the body. The overall effect suggests competence rather than performance, substance rather than flash.

Volvo’s signature lighting elements anchor the design. The Thor’s Hammer LED headlights have become as recognizable as BMW’s kidney grilles or Audi’s rings.

The 2026 refresh brings a cleaner grille treatment that echoes the larger XC90, with diagonal bar elements replacing previous iterations. Black internal housings within the headlight assemblies add depth and modernity without requiring additional brightwork. The lower fascia integrates real airflow openings at the corners, avoiding the fake vent epidemic that plagues the segment. Parking sensors and the forward camera system disappear into the design rather than appearing as afterthoughts. The front face communicates premium positioning through execution quality rather than aggressive styling, a distinction that matters as the vehicle ages. Designs that rely on current trends date quickly. Designs that prioritize proportion and finish quality remain relevant longer.

In profile, the XC60 reveals its proportional confidence. The greenhouse maintains a traditional three-box rhythm with proper A, B, and C pillars rather than the floating roof illusions that have become common. Window surrounds in chrome or black depending on specification provide subtle accent without excessive ornamentation. Roof rails sit low and functional. The overall side view could almost be mistaken for a wagon at certain angles, a reference to Volvo’s estate car heritage that feels intentional rather than accidental.

The rear design employs tall, smoked LED taillights that climb the D-pillars in a signature pattern. VOLVO block lettering spans the tailgate cleanly. T8, Recharge, and AWD badging identifies the powertrain without cluttering the surface. A subtle diffuser-style lower bumper treatment with integrated reflectors replaces visible exhaust outlets, acknowledging the plug-in hybrid’s ability to operate without combustion. The paint palette reinforces the design philosophy: Crystal White Metallic, Onyx Black Metallic, Denim Blue, and Vapour Grey. These colors reward close inspection rather than demanding attention from across a parking lot.

Interior Architecture

Opening the door reveals the XC60’s primary design statement. Where the exterior whispers, the interior speaks clearly about Volvo’s priorities. The immediate impression is of a cocoon, a space designed for occupants rather than spectators. Surfaces flow horizontally across the dashboard, creating visual width and calm.

The Ultra trim layers Nappa leather across the seating surfaces with substantial bolstering and careful stitching. Available colorways include Charcoal for those who prefer darker, more enveloping environments and Blond for an airier, more open feel. Both options demonstrate restraint in their application, avoiding the contrasting piping and excessive quilting that some competitors use to signal luxury. Material transitions occur at logical boundaries rather than arbitrary decorative lines. Real open-pore wood, metal mesh, and textured inlays provide tactile variety without visual chaos. The surfaces invite touch rather than discouraging it.

The center console demonstrates Scandinavian minimalism in practice. A portrait-oriented 9-inch touchscreen dominates the interface.

Below it, a small number of physical controls remain for frequently used functions. The volume knob uses a knurled metal finish that rewards tactile interaction. On higher specifications, an Orrefors crystal-style shifter replaces the standard gear selector, introducing a jewelry-like element that catches light without demanding attention. The panoramic moonroof, standard or widely available depending on market, brings natural light into what might otherwise feel cave-like in darker trim configurations. This interplay between enclosed comfort and external connection runs throughout the interior design.

Seating architecture prioritizes long-distance comfort over sports car support. The front seats offer heating, ventilation, and massage functions in Ultra specification, with adjustable lumbar support and thigh extenders for taller occupants. The seats themselves provide substantial cushioning without feeling soft, maintaining shape and support over extended drives. This is furniture designed for hours of use rather than showroom photography. Rear accommodations follow suit with a gently reclined backrest and support that favors two adults comfortably over three-across capacity. The cabin is honest about its size: this is a compact luxury SUV, not a full-size family hauler.

Storage solutions appear throughout the cabin without disrupting the visual calm. A larger-than-previous center console bin holds items out of sight. Cupholders position logically. Door pockets accommodate bottles and smaller items. Bag hooks and nets behind the front seats provide additional organization in some configurations. The cargo area maintains a broad, square opening with practical load floor height. Split-folding rear seats create a flat surface when more capacity is needed. The plug-in hybrid packaging, often a compromise in other vehicles, preserves useful cargo space without major intrusion.

Material Composition

Material selection in the XC60 Ultra reveals Volvo’s understanding of tactile luxury. Soft-touch surfaces cover the dashboard and upper door panels, providing warmth that cold leather cannot. The leather appointments on the seats use proper grain texture rather than the over-processed smoothness that signals synthetic origin. Stitching appears precise and consistent, following design lines rather than merely holding materials together. The contrast between different textures, matte leather, polished metal, open-pore wood, creates visual interest through material honesty rather than applied decoration. Each surface communicates what it is made from without pretense.

Lower cabin areas use plastics that feel dense and well-fitted rather than hollow and cost-reduced. Panel gaps remain tight and consistent throughout.

The metal trim elements, appearing on speaker grilles, door handles, and climate control surrounds, use actual aluminum rather than chrome-look plastic. These details matter because they accumulate into an overall impression of quality that either supports or undermines the purchase price. At this specification level, the details support the price consistently. The XC60 Ultra feels expensive because expensive materials have been used in places where human contact occurs.

Volvo’s approach to material selection extends to environmental considerations without compromising luxury perception. Leather alternatives appear in some configurations using recycled materials and more sustainable processing. Wood trim sources from responsible forestry programs. Metal finishes use processes that reduce environmental impact. These choices remain largely invisible to occupants but align with the brand’s stated values and appeal to buyers who consider lifecycle impact alongside immediate tactile experience.

Technology Integration

The XC60 T8 Ultra runs a Google-based infotainment system that represents Volvo’s commitment to simplicity over complexity. Google Assistant provides voice control. Google Maps handles navigation with traffic-aware routing. The Google ecosystem allows app access without requiring phone mirroring, though wireless Apple CarPlay remains available for those who prefer it. The 9-inch portrait touchscreen displays information clearly with quick response to inputs.

A 12-inch digital instrument cluster ahead of the driver offers configurable views including a large navigation map, trip data, and driver assistance status. Information hierarchy follows logical priorities: speed and essential warnings remain prominent while secondary data occupies peripheral positions. An available head-up display projects key information onto the windshield, reducing the need to look away from the road. The display can read speed limits and traffic signs, overlaying them in the driver’s line of sight. These technologies serve practical purposes rather than existing as specification sheet items. The question Volvo seems to have asked is not “what can we add” but “what should we show.”

Some functions require menu navigation that feels deeper than necessary. Odometer readings and certain vehicle settings live multiple taps into the interface.

Audio options include Harman Kardon and an available Bowers and Wilkins system depending on package and market. The latter delivers clarity and richness that transforms the cabin into a listening environment worth experiencing. The sound system represents genuine acoustic engineering rather than speaker count marketing. For a vehicle designed around calm and comfort, high-quality audio integration aligns with the overall philosophy. Poor sound reproduction would undermine the cabin’s premium character.

The technology package demonstrates appropriate restraint alongside capability. Rather than introducing features that require user adaptation, Volvo has implemented systems that work in expected ways. Climate controls respond logically. Navigation provides sensible routes. The instrument cluster communicates without confusion. This sounds like a low bar, but the automotive industry regularly introduces interfaces that prioritize novelty over usability. The XC60’s technology feels like it was designed by people who actually use cars rather than by teams seeking differentiation through complexity.

Powertrain Character

The T8 plug-in hybrid powertrain pairs a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder with an electric motor on the rear axle and a starter-generator between the engine and 8-speed automatic transmission. Combined output reaches approximately 455 horsepower and 523 pound-feet of torque, according to Volvo’s estimates and independent testing. Acceleration to 60 mph arrives in 4.4 to 4.5 seconds, figures that seem incongruous with the vehicle’s reserved styling. This is substantial performance delivered without visual announcement. The vehicle looks calm and moves quickly when requested.

The 18.8 kWh battery provides electric-only range of approximately 32 to 35 miles. This distance covers typical daily commuting for many drivers, allowing pure electric operation for routine trips.

When the battery depletes, combined efficiency settles around 28 mpg. Hybrid operation achieves approximately 63 MPGe. Multiple drive modes, including Hybrid, Pure/EV, Power, and configurable settings, allow drivers to prioritize electric operation, preserve charge for later use, or access maximum combined output. The powertrain flexibility means the XC60 can behave as a quiet urban electric vehicle or a responsive highway cruiser depending on circumstance and driver preference.

The driving experience prioritizes refinement over excitement. Throttle response feels progressive rather than aggressive. The transmission shifts smoothly in normal operation and responds quickly when more power is demanded. The engine remains quiet unless pushed hard, which the vehicle’s character rarely encourages. With the available air suspension on Ultra trim, ride quality emphasizes comfort over sporting sharpness. Body motions stay controlled without feeling harsh. Road imperfections disappear into the suspension rather than transmitting through the structure. Steering provides adequate feedback for confident placement without sporting precision. The XC60 T8 Ultra drives like it looks: composed, capable, and disinclined toward drama.

Daily Reality

Living with the XC60 T8 Ultra reveals strengths that matter more than specification numbers. The cabin’s noise isolation creates a quiet environment at highway speeds, making conversation easy and audio systems worth using. The seats remain comfortable over extended drives, maintaining support without creating pressure points. Climate controls work effectively, and the available air quality monitoring adds practical value in urban environments where exterior air quality varies.

The air suspension’s height adjustment proves useful beyond ride quality. Raising the vehicle provides additional ground clearance for rough roads or driveway approaches.

Lowering it at highway speeds improves aerodynamics and eases entry in low parking structures. The system operates automatically based on conditions, removing the need for driver intervention in most situations. The 360-degree camera system and parking sensors make placing the vehicle in tight spaces manageable despite dimensions that require awareness. The rearview camera displays clearly and inspires confidence during reversing maneuvers.

Some compromises exist within the daily experience. The infotainment system, while functional, lacks the polish of certain German competitors. Response is good but not instant. The interface is logical but not intuitive. This represents adequate execution rather than impressive achievement. Fuel economy, when operating in hybrid mode after battery depletion, requires more frequent stops than three-row crossovers or smaller luxury SUVs. The premium fuel requirement adds cost over regular-grade alternatives. Pricing for the T8 Ultra specification sits in the low to mid 70,000 dollar range before options, with well-equipped examples approaching 80,000 dollars. This positions the XC60 against mid-specification German rivals with established prestige and strong dealer networks.

The vehicle serves specific needs exceptionally well. Commuters with charging access at home or work can operate primarily on electric power, reducing fuel consumption dramatically. Families who prioritize cabin quality over maximum cargo flexibility will appreciate the material choices and seating comfort. Buyers seeking luxury without visual aggression will find the XC60’s restraint appealing rather than disappointing.

Competitive Context

The XC60 T8 Ultra competes against established German plug-in hybrids and traditional luxury crossovers. The BMW X3, Mercedes-Benz GLC, and Audi Q5 offer similar dimensions with different design philosophies. German competitors typically prioritize sharper styling, sportier dynamics, and more tech-forward cabins.

Volvo’s approach differs fundamentally. Where German brands emphasize cockpit-like driver focus with large screen arrays and aggressive surfacing, the XC60 creates a lounge-like environment that serves passengers equally to drivers. Material quality matches or exceeds German alternatives at similar price points. Design vocabulary speaks a different language entirely, one of restraint rather than assertion. The XC60 often offers a modest EV range advantage over many German plug-in rivals, providing practical benefit for drivers who can charge regularly. The power output, approximately 455 horsepower combined, exceeds most segment rivals while the acceleration times remain competitive with dedicated performance variants.

Value within the segment depends on buyer priorities. The XC60 T8 Ultra includes features that cost extra on some competitors: air suspension, premium audio, advanced driver assistance systems. Buyers who value standard equipment over brand prestige may find the Volvo offers more content for comparable money. Those who prioritize established luxury badge recognition or sportier driving dynamics may prefer the German alternatives. The competitive landscape rewards Volvo for differentiation rather than imitation.

The Design Verdict

The 2026 Volvo XC60 T8 AWD Ultra represents a coherent design philosophy executed with consistency and restraint. Every element, from exterior surfacing to interior materials to powertrain calibration, supports the same message: luxury does not require aggression. The vehicle proves that calm confidence communicates premium positioning as effectively as visual drama. This is design maturity applied to the luxury compact SUV segment, a category that often rewards excess over editing.

For buyers who recognize that vehicles shape daily experience through accumulated small interactions, the XC60 offers compelling value. The material quality supports years of use. The technology serves rather than complicates. The powertrain provides capability without demanding attention. The design will age gracefully rather than dating quickly. These qualities matter because vehicles occupy significant portions of our lives and our attention. The XC60 T8 AWD Ultra creates space for calm within transportation. In a segment defined by competition for visual attention, that restraint becomes its own form of statement. Volvo has built a vehicle that trusts its quality to communicate luxury without requiring volume. The execution justifies that trust.

The post Volvo XC60 T8 AWD Ultra Review: Scandinavian Calm in a Segment That Prefers to Shout first appeared on Yanko Design.