Author Archives: Sarang Sheth

Ergonomic chairs rarely account for taller, broader users. LiberNovo built one, and it’s on discount for a week

Posted on by

Ergonomic chairs may finally be having their XL moment. For years, the category has obsessed over lumbar dials, mesh backs, and posture-perfect adjustability, while a basic fit issue kept slipping through the cracks. Taller and broader users still end up with headrests that fall short, seats that cut off thigh support, and backrests that narrow right where fuller shoulders and wider frames need them most. Fashion learned long ago that fit changes everything. Office seating has taken its time getting there.

LiberNovo’s Maxis brings that shift into focus with proportions aimed at bigger frames, including an ultra-deep seat, a broader backrest, a longer-range headrest, and a controlled recline system built for steadier support. With the first-launch offer now in its final 7 days, the Maxis arrives at exactly the moment when ergonomic design feels ready to stop treating larger bodies like an afterthought.

Designer: LiberNovo

Click Here to Buy Now: $809 $1299 ($490 off). Hurry, deal ends in 48-hours!

LiberNovo’s thinking with the Maxis starts with a premise that should have been more common in this category much earlier: bigger bodies carry different ergonomic demands, and scaling up a standard chair does not address them. The seat runs 52cm deep, enough to deliver full thigh support and put an end to the floating-leg issue that taller users deal with on most office chairs. The back frame spans 430mm at the shoulder and 520mm at the waist, covering the kind of broader build that standard backrests tend to taper away from at precisely the wrong moment. The chair targets users between 5’10” and 6’7″ and up to 399 lbs, a range that has historically been left to sort through limited options in a category that treats average proportions as a universal fit.

A U-shaped headrest with 140mm of vertical travel and 120mm of horizontal adjustment tackles one of the more persistent frustrations for taller sitters: the headrest that lands somewhere around the neck rather than behind it. The adjustment range gives users with longer torsos the clearance to place support where it actually belongs. The Arc Armrests follow a curved path outward, keeping broader frames from feeling squeezed in and addressing the kind of side compression that builds quietly across a long session without ever quite announcing itself as the source of discomfort.

Six springs run through the recline mechanism, producing a progressive lean-back that holds its composure under bigger bodies. The gap between this and the standard recline on most office chairs is felt rather than measured. Under heavier loads, an underdeveloped recline either locks up too rigidly or releases too suddenly. The Maxis builds a more graduated response into the system, so the lean-back feels deliberate and controlled through the full range of motion.

Choosing between the Manual, Electric, and Airflow is the first real decision for anyone looking at the Maxis, and the differences between them are substantial enough to take seriously. The Manual keeps things mechanical and intentional, using a physical dial for lumbar adjustment. It suits users who prefer a set-and-go approach and have no interest in adding electronics to their seating. The Electric introduces motorized lumbar control alongside OmniStretch, a spinal decompression cycle built into the chair that guides the lumbar support through a stretch-and-release sequence designed to reduce the compression that accumulates during extended sitting. That is a genuinely useful feature for anyone logging serious desk hours. The Airflow takes everything the Electric offers and adds active seat ventilation through a centrifugal fan embedded in the cushion, managing heat and moisture for users who run warm or regularly sit through long, uninterrupted sessions.

The Maxis does the heavy lifting for bigger builds, but LiberNovo is rounding out the same launch window with two additions aimed at standard-size users who want something more specific from their seating. The Omni Pro brings motorized lumbar support, OmniStretch, and active seat ventilation to the existing Omni platform, making it the performance-oriented pick for users who want the full feature set without the larger Maxis frame. The Omni SE takes the opposite approach, pairing the same ergonomic architecture with a manual lumbar mechanism for a cleaner, simpler setup that rewards users who prefer comfort without a control panel. Both carry LiberNovo’s same core philosophy of support that responds to movement, just packaged around different priorities and price points.

Seven days is not much runway, so if you have made it this far, it is worth heading over to LiberNovo’s storefront. Each Maxis version comes with bundle options, including StepSync Footrest bundles, while the Electric and Airflow models also offer premium bundles with an extra battery. The current pricing brings the Maxis Manual down to $809 from $1,299, the Maxis Electric down to $1,049 from $1,799, and the Maxis Airflow down to $1,239 from $1,859. The Omni Pro and Omni SE are also discounted as part of the same first-launch window, starting at $909 and $569, respectively. The first-release offer closes on July 31st across the board, which makes this week the last real opportunity to get into any of these chairs at launch pricing.

Click Here to Buy Now: $809 $1299 ($490 off). Hurry, deal ends in 48-hours!

The post Ergonomic chairs rarely account for taller, broader users. LiberNovo built one, and it’s on discount for a week first appeared on Yanko Design.

AirPods Max 2 Finally Get Custom EQ in iOS 27 Beta

Posted on by

Apple has a playbook for innovation that often involves letting a feature mature elsewhere before adopting it, gift-wrapped, as a profound breakthrough. Widgets appeared on the iPhone long after becoming an Android signature, presented not as a catch-up but as a thoughtful redesign. A calculator app on the iPad took nearly 15 years to become reality. Multitasking came years after Android got it, packaged as Stage Manager. Even the simple act of circling an item to search for it, a trick already familiar on other platforms, is being framed as a new kind of magic. That same playbook is now being run on the AirPods Max 2’s equalizer, a feature that was conspicuously absent when the $549 headphones launched four months ago but has now arrived with the July 14 public beta of iOS 27.

The implementation is classic Apple. The new Equalizer screen is lush and responsive, with an animated waveform that pulses to your music under three simple drag handles: Low, Mid, and High. It feels intuitive, and it looks alive on the screen. This is also a stark contrast to the multi-band or parametric controls that have been standard on flagship headphones from Sony and Bose for years. Just as with Widgets and Stage Manager, Apple has delivered the feature on its own terms and on its own timeline, handing users a beautifully designed tool that prioritizes aesthetic simplicity over the technical depth many owners of a $549 headphone were actually waiting for.

Designer: Apple

That polish, though, also reveals the limit of Apple’s ambition here. Three bands is enough to boost bass, pull back mids, or brighten the top end, but it is still a blunt instrument compared to the multi-band and parametric EQ controls that rivals like Sony and Bose have offered on flagship headphones for years. For casual listeners, that may be perfectly fine. Most people do not want to think in frequencies, Q values, or narrow corrective cuts. They want vocals clearer, bass deeper, and harshness reduced. Apple’s interface serves that audience beautifully.

The problem is that Apple has spent real effort positioning the AirPods Max 2 as a premium audio product for creators, podcasters, and Logic Pro adjacent workflows. In that context, a three-band EQ feels less like a full correction and more like the minimum viable answer to a very public complaint. Reviews at launch repeatedly called out the absence of manual EQ, and this update finally closes that gap. What it does not do is move the AirPods Max 2 into the same conversation as tools built for more serious sound shaping.

That leaves the update in a very Apple place: fashionably late, classically elegant, and strategically simplified. The custom EQ finally gives AirPods Max 2 owners control they should have had from day one, but it also reinforces the company’s longstanding instinct to decide how much control its users really need. For some buyers, this will feel like a thoughtful refinement. For others, especially anyone spending $549 on over-ear headphones with professional aspirations, it may feel like Apple arrived to the party with a beautifully wrapped gift everyone else opened years ago.

The post AirPods Max 2 Finally Get Custom EQ in iOS 27 Beta first appeared on Yanko Design.

Sennheiser’s $200 Clip-On Buds Defeat Bose Ultra Open on Battery — And Skip the US

Posted on by

Clip-on earbuds were always going to go mainstream; the category just got there in the east first. Huawei’s FreeClip became roughly as ubiquitous as AirPods in Chinese cities, building an installed base for open-ear wearables that Western brands are only now beginning to seriously contest. The appeal is not complicated: a form factor that keeps the ear canal open, lets ambient sound in naturally, and eliminates the sealed pressure that makes conventional in-ears uncomfortable after long sessions. Asia ran that experiment at scale, and the results were settled long before the Western audio press started treating it as a breakthrough.

Sennheiser enters the conversation on July 23 with the Accentum Clip, a product priced at £149 that brings Bluetooth 6.0, LDAC support, IP54 protection, and 36-hour total battery life to a category where Bose has been setting the reference point at a higher price. The launch covers the UK, EU, and Canada. For US consumers, the Accentum Clip joins a lengthening list of globally significant products that simply will not be available at their local retailer, a pattern this publication has been tracking across categories as diverse as electric vehicles, smartphones, and now, apparently, open-ear audio.

Designer: Sennheiser

The Accentum Clip earbuds promise nine hours of playback on a single charge, with the case providing a total of 36 hours. This is a deliberate and significant advantage over the Bose Ultra Open Earbuds, which offer around 7.5 hours per charge and a total of 27 hours with their case. In a category built for all-day wear, that extra nine hours is a direct appeal to users who want to leave the charging cable at home.

The Accentum Clip uses a 12mm dynamic driver, but the more interesting detail is its support for the LDAC codec. Including a high-bitrate codec like LDAC is a bold choice for an open-ear design, which by its nature lets sound escape and ambient noise in. It signals a confidence in the driver’s ability to deliver a detailed audio experience, even if it is not a closed, isolating one. Paired with Bluetooth 6.0, which promises more stable multipoint connections, the package is technically robust for commuters and office workers who need to switch between devices seamlessly.

Sennheiser opted for a flexible silicone bridge to connect the driver unit and the battery component, quite like Bose’s offering. At 6.8 grams per bud, the design focuses on a gentle, secure clamping force that distributes weight evenly around the ear’s cartilage. The goal is a “barely there” feeling that encourages leaving them on for hours, which aligns perfectly with the product’s impressive battery life. The IP54 rating for dust and splash resistance makes them durable enough for workouts, even if they are not explicitly marketed as fitness gear.

These engineering choices culminate in a fairly reasonable price tag. At £149 or €179 (around $200 USD), the Accentum Clip is positioned aggressively beneath the Bose Ultra Open, which launched at $299. Sennheiser is not trying to create a new category; it is trying to win the one Bose popularized by being a better value on paper. It is a classic challenger strategy: arrive a little late to the party, but bring a better spec sheet and a more accessible price. For European and Canadian buyers, the choice between the two just became much more interesting.

Which brings us back to that curious launch map. The decision to omit the United States, the world’s largest single market for high-end audio, feels a lot like a symptom of a broader shift in the tech industry. Whether due to the complexities of FCC certification, a desire to test the product in smaller markets first, or the simple fact that the US is becoming a harder place for global brands to operate, the absence is loud.

The post Sennheiser’s $200 Clip-On Buds Defeat Bose Ultra Open on Battery — And Skip the US first appeared on Yanko Design.

After MouthPad, Augmental unveils Vox, a privacy-focused wearable mic that lets you whisper-to-type

Posted on by

The most interesting interface ideas often begin where conventional gadgets start to fail. Voice assistants want you to speak up, microphones capture the whole room, and public dictation still feels awkward in the age of AI. Augmental’s latest product, Vox, approaches that problem from a very different angle, placing a speech interface on the chest where it can listen closely to the wearer and stay nearly invisible under a shirt.

When Augmental introduced MouthPad, it showed how assistive technology could evolve into something far more refined than a visible workaround. The in-mouth interface gave users hands-free cursor control through a custom dental form factor, and now together, MouthPad and Vox begin to outline a new computing language built around the body. One handles navigation through subtle tongue gestures, the other captures quiet speech for dictation and commands, recreating the familiar logic of mouse and keyboard in a wearable, deeply personal form.

Designer: Augmental

Tomás Vega sat down with Yanko Design to show us Vox, but he started by talking about the success of MouthPad. Over a hundred users now rely on it for daily computing, with some logging up to 16 hours of use in a single day. One user, he mentioned, started her undergraduate degree with the device and is now finishing her studies in mathematics. Another told him how it freed him from his wheelchair-anchored setup, letting him work from the comfort of his bed. These stories ground Augmental’s work in real human impact, which makes the arrival of Vox feel like a natural next chapter.

The core problem Vox tackles is that voice technology assumes everyone has a strong, clear voice and is comfortable speaking aloud. That isn’t always true. For users with speech impediments, weakened voices, or lost lung function, standard microphones just don’t work well. Even for those who can speak clearly, privacy is a real concern; private computer access is a right everyone should have. Vox was built for these constraints, but the solution ends up having much broader appeal. It even helps people who stutter, including Tomás himself, because whispering can reduce stuttering and make voice AI more accessible.

The logic behind Vox is pretty clever, drawing inspiration from a doctor’s stethoscope. It sits against the skin under your shirt and is optimized to capture the low-volume speech that travels through your body. An acoustic horn inside the device gathers the subtle vibrations and air displacement from your skin and channels them into a super-sensitive MEMS microphone that is tuned specifically for human speech. The raw audio sounds a bit like hearing someone talk underwater, but Augmental’s signal processing cleans it up to isolate exactly what the speech-to-text model needs. Because the mic is facing your body instead of the room, it’s a personal microphone designed for you and only you.

The relationship between the two products is what makes the whole system click. As Tomás puts it, MouthPad is the mouse, and Vox is the keyboard. Together, they offer full computer control that is both private and hands-free. MouthPad handles all the navigation with tongue gestures on its trackpad, and its radial menu turns complex actions like copy-and-paste into a single, simple gesture. Vox then adds the speech layer, which can be activated with a button press or through the MouthPad itself. The idea is that you put it on in the morning and forget it’s there, always available but almost entirely invisible.

Looking at it next to the MouthPad, you can immediately see the family resemblance. Vox is a circular, transparent pendant on a simple white cord, with its internals visible enough to look engineered but not so much that it feels cold or clinical. The three colored buttons on the side, orange, black, and gray, can be remapped to do whatever you want, whether that’s firing up a specific AI agent, switching devices, or just controlling your music. The long-term vision is even more integrated, with Tomás imagining a future of “skinware” where these functions might one day live in a smart tooth or a small skin patch.

For now, Vox is launching as a beta, with the first wave limited to a few hundred units priced at $200. This is a deliberate choice to learn from early users before scaling up. The MouthPad, for comparison, is $1,400, a price that reflects the complex custom-fit process, which involves a 3D scan at one of Augmental’s hundreds of partner dental centers across the US. The Vox pendant has a battery that lasts about eight hours, with enough power for around two hours of straight transcription time, which is more than enough for a full day of dictation. You can learn more and get yours over at augmental.tech.

The post After MouthPad, Augmental unveils Vox, a privacy-focused wearable mic that lets you whisper-to-type first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Only Thing Missing From This LEGO Coffee Set Is the Smell

Posted on by

LEGO fans are obsessive. Coffee fans are obsessive. Somewhere at the exact intersection of those two fandoms sits ModularManiac’s Coffee Collection, a build that exists purely because someone looked at their pour-over setup one morning and thought it deserved to be immortalized in bricks. Five separate builds, one shared obsession.

The set nails the process end to end: a gooseneck kettle mid-pour, a dripper loaded with grounds, a finished cup topped with latte art, even a coffea arabica plant growing berries nearby. Steam curls off the cup in brick form. The only thing this build can’t replicate is the smell, that first hit of fresh grounds and hot water that makes the whole ritual worth doing in the first place.

Designer: ModularManiac

Start with the pour-over, because it’s the mechanical centerpiece of the whole collection. The dripper’s pleated white filter might be the only non-lego element here, but I honestly can’t think of an alternative. It sits inside a transparent cone that shows LEGO pellet coffee grounds inside. Below it, a glass carafe holds a pool of translucent brown pieces standing in for brewed coffee. A gooseneck kettle accompanies the build, giving you exactly the right kind of hardware a coffee-nerd would expect from this build. Everything’s scaled to match each other, so you could even mimic your pouring pattern with this brickset… Yes I know you absolutely will.

A tiny cup sits on a saucer and comes with interchangeable latte art discs, built from gold and cream pieces arranged into foam-art patterns you can swap in and out depending on whether you want to mimic an espresso, a doppio, a cortado, or a macchiato. It’s a genuinely clever mechanism dressed up as a novelty, since the whole cup assembly pulls apart to let you customize the design sitting on top. Next to it, a small spoon rounds out the tabletop scene, presumably for stirring in sugar, and the coffea arabica plant stands off to the side with berries built along posable stems, giving the whole collection a quiet nod to where any of this actually comes from.

Altogether the build runs around 1,400 pieces across those five objects: kettle, pour-over, plant, spoon, and cup. None of it is enormous individually, but staged together on a shelf or a desk, it reads as a complete scene rather than five disconnected models, which is harder to pull off than it sounds.

The set has already picked up a Staff Pick badge on LEGO Ideas, the platform where fan designers submit builds like this one for the community to vote on. Cross 10,000 supporters and LEGO’s internal team reviews the project for a possible retail release. The Coffee Collection currently sits at 2,242 supporters with 590 days left to hit its first checkpoint of 5,000, so there’s time to help push it along. If your desk is missing a coffee ritual that never actually needs refilling (or if you’re a recovering caffeine addict who wants their fix without breaking their streak), you can cast your vote on the LEGO Ideas page here.

The post The Only Thing Missing From This LEGO Coffee Set Is the Smell first appeared on Yanko Design.

Canon scrapped its most ambitious vlogging camera ever… Here’s what the patent reveals

Posted on by

Canon has filed three separate patents chasing a handheld vlogging camera, five years apart, and each one solved a completely different problem than the one before it. The version everyone read about this spring is a fixed lens gimbal with a smart shutdown sequence, built to compete with the Osmo Pocket 4, and it traces cleanly back to a 2024 filing. Its real ancestor sits further back, in a December 2020 patent that rarely gets mentioned in the same breath, and it deserved better than being forgotten. That filing wasn’t a gimbal camera at all, despite early reports calling it exactly that. It was a pistol grip built around an interchangeable lens mount and a motorized head that only pans and tilts, aimed at creators who wanted a real sensor and real glass in something you could frame with one hand. Had Canon actually built it, this would have been the most ambitious vlogging camera the company ever attempted, not the fixed lens compromise it eventually shipped toward instead.

DPReview had to rewrite its own coverage once it worked through the Japanese documents, since the initial assumption of Osmo style stabilization didn’t hold up against what the patent actually claimed. Control came from a rear touchpad and a front trigger for preset framing points, with the display flipping automatically depending on lens orientation. Canon even filed a follow up patent for a lock to stop the lens twisting free mid motion, evidence of how much engineering went into a product that never left the drawing board. The mount in the drawings lines up with EF-M, a system Canon has since confirmed is finished, lenses gone and shipments halted for good. Comparing that abandoned idea to this year’s fixed lens gimbal makes one thing obvious, Canon already had its most ambitious vlogging camera worked out on paper years ago, and simply never pulled the trigger.

A 360 degree pan and roughly 270 degrees of tilt let the lens swing from a landscape shot to a selfie without repositioning the grip. A rear touchpad aimed the head, a front trigger locked preset framing points, and two buttons handled recording and playback. The camera also read its own orientation, flipping the display when the lens rotated backward and switching to vertical when the grip turned ninety degrees. A hot shoe up top took a mic or a light. None of it needed a phone paired over Bluetooth, unlike most gimbal cameras built since.

Patent application 2021-004930 would have added a lock to stop the lens releasing by accident, since a lens on a motorized head has nothing solid to brace against while you twist it free. CanonNews and DPReview both read the mount as EF-M based on the tab position in the drawings, backed by a separate filing for an add on grip and adapter meant for larger lenses. Canon’s own documents admit the tradeoff, since a bigger adapted lens would have limited the head’s pan and tilt range, while a compact EF-M prime would have kept full motion. It is a rare case of a patent documenting its own compromise instead of pretending the idea scales cleanly. EF-M is gone now, with Canon USA confirming shipments in the region have ended, so this camera never got the chance to grow into a second generation of lenses.

Canon’s April patent takes the opposite bet, a fixed lens gimbal with a folding head and a shutdown sequence smart enough to know when nobody is holding it. That is a sensible answer to the Osmo Pocket 4, though a smaller idea than the one Canon shelved earlier, since a fixed lens will never accept a wider prime the way an EF-M mount could have. Canon spent five years learning that practicality sells better than ambition, and this year’s patent proves the lesson stuck. Somewhere in Tokyo sits the version of this camera that would have actually mattered to people who own lenses, and Canon decided it was too complicated to build. Whatever ships next will be more reliable than the 2021 concept, but it will also be the safer camera, worth remembering next time Canon calls something a first for creators.

The post Canon scrapped its most ambitious vlogging camera ever… Here’s what the patent reveals first appeared on Yanko Design.

Samsung and Google Are Trying Smart Glasses Again, at the Worst Possible Time

Posted on by

“Glasshole” entered Urban Dictionary as word of the day in March 2013, which tells you roughly how long it took society to make up its mind about face-mounted cameras. Google Glass had barely reached early users when bars, restaurants, and theaters started banning it. The device died from a social verdict so decisive it became a punchline. A decade later, Google is back. At Samsung’s Galaxy Unpacked in London today, the company helped reveal a new generation of AI-powered smart glasses, co-engineered with Samsung, dressed up in Warby Parker frames, and powered by Gemini. Same idea. Different fonts.

The climate into which these glasses arrive is not quiet. Meta spent the better part of 2026 trying to convince the public that AI glasses are aspirational, recruiting Kylie Jenner for the Meta Starfire Kylie Edition at $399 and positioning it as a style statement. What followed was a wave of coverage about covert recordings, a social media tutorial on disabling the LED light meant to prevent covert recording, and a protest campaign near Meta’s headquarters branding the glasses “fascist.” Some owners are reportedly now reluctant to wear them in public, having learned that the street name for their $399 fashion statement is “pervert glasses.” Google could not have picked a stranger moment to try again.

Designers: Samsung, Google, Warby Parker, and Gentle Monster

So what exactly did Samsung and Google show up with today? The glasses, branded Intelligent Eyewear, come in two designs: a slim black frame from Gentle Monster with a refined, fashion-forward silhouette, and a rich brown Warby Parker edition with a subtly upswept brow line meant for everyday wear. Under the hood, the Snapdragon AR1 Gen 1 chip handles the processing, the same silicon inside Ray-Ban Meta’s glasses, which is either reassuring or ironic depending on your mood. Gemini runs as the AI assistant on Android XR, the platform Samsung and Google co-developed, delivering information spoken into your ear rather than displayed on a screen. Battery life sits at nine hours, with a charging case that carries up to seven additional full charges. There is a built-in camera. There is always a built-in camera.

The positioning is reasonably clever and deliberate. By going audio-first with no display, Samsung sidesteps the cyborg-visor aesthetic that made Google Glass so alienating, and by partnering with Gentle Monster and Warby Parker, two brands with genuine fashion credibility, they are betting that good frames can do what celebrity endorsements and $400 price tags couldn’t for Meta. The glasses also pair with both Android and iOS, which removes the ecosystem friction that would otherwise halve the addressable market before a single unit ships. On paper, this is the most considered entry into smart glasses anyone has made.

The paper, unfortunately, has to reconcile with the sh*tstorm that is Meta and Kylie’s brand collab. Kylie Jenner’s job in the Meta Starfire campaign was to make AI glasses feel safe and aspirational, particularly for women. She wore them, posed with them, starred in content shot from the glasses’ own point of view. What nobody at Meta apparently modeled was the possibility that Jenner’s involvement would become the story, and the story would be unflattering. Lorde publicly called the glasses “not sexy.” Women across Brussels and beyond reported being filmed without consent by men wearing the exact product Jenner was paid to glamorize. Meta had to patch their own hardware to stop people from disabling the recording indicator light. The fact that a patch was required is its own headline.

Samsung and Google have built in visible recording indicators and user-controlled privacy settings, which they are smart to advertise loudly. But the problem Meta created for the entire category goes deeper than indicator lights. The public now has a fixed mental model of what a camera on someone’s face means, and it was not built by reading spec sheets. It was built by watching someone get filmed on the bus, by the NameTag story, by “pervert glasses” becoming the phrase that stuck when “Intelligent Eyewear” didn’t.

Google killed Glass in 2015 because society rejected the behaviour the device enabled before the technology even had a chance to mature. Everything Samsung unveiled today is genuinely more refined, more considered, and more fashionable than anything Glass ever was. The question is whether any of that is the actual problem. Going by recent evidence, the frames were never really the issue.

The post Samsung and Google Are Trying Smart Glasses Again, at the Worst Possible Time first appeared on Yanko Design.

Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Ultra2 Is Now Thinner Than the Apple Watch Ultra 3, and Its Battery Still Grew 35%

Posted on by

I’ve tried on almost every rugged smartwatch worth talking about at some point, Garmin’s Fenix line, the Coros Vertix, Apple’s Watch Ultra, a few G-Shocks that technically count as smart now. And every single one turned my wrist into a doorstop. Titanium and steel cases solve durability by adding mass, and mass has a way of showing up as thickness, the one spec nobody brags about in a press release. Samsung’s original Galaxy Watch Ultra fit right into that pattern, a genuinely capable watch that still felt like strapping a hockey puck to your arm. So when Samsung says the Galaxy Watch Ultra2 shed 12% of its case height, that’s worth a second look, because that number usually comes at the cost of battery, and Samsung didn’t make that trade this time.

The new Ultra2 measures 10.7mm thick, down from 12.1mm, while its battery grew 35% to 800mAh. For comparison, the Apple Watch Ultra 3 still ships in the same 14.4mm case Apple has used since 2023, meaning Samsung’s rugged flagship is now meaningfully thinner than Apple’s. It comes in one 47mm size, priced at $699.99, up for preorder now with an August 7 release. The case shape hasn’t changed though, and that squircle silhouette is, well, it’s something.

Designer: Samsung Electronics

The trick isn’t hiding in the tooling, it’s in what Samsung tore out of the motherboard this year. Swapping the in-house Exynos W1000 for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Wear Elite isn’t just a performance story, it’s a real estate story, since a different chip package almost always means a different board footprint underneath the display stack. Shrink or flatten that board and you free up vertical space for exactly the two things Samsung actually wanted more of, glass and battery. That’s likely how a watch gets thinner and holds 35% more charge in the same breath, a trade that usually isn’t available to engineers. The one wrinkle is that the Ultra2 is about a gram heavier than before, which tells me some of that freed space went right back into denser cell chemistry rather than thinner titanium.

Every hands-on published this week reaches for the same word to describe that flat-topped case, polarizing, as if refusing to be a circle is some kind of design crime. I’d push back on that read, because the squircle is doing real functional work, not just standing out at a Samsung keynote. A flat bezel lets Samsung etch actual hour numerals into the metal for a glanceable readout, something a curved rotating bezel can’t do nearly as cleanly. It also gives the sapphire front a flush, uninterrupted seal against the frame, which matters more once you’re strapping this thing on for a dive. Casio figured this out decades ago with the square DW-5600, a shape divers and soldiers kept buying long after round watches became fashionable again.

That instinct pays off literally underwater this year, since the Ultra2 is the first Galaxy Watch to earn EN13319 certification for dive instruments, alongside IP69K and 10ATM. Professional dive computers from Suunto and Shearwater have never been round for the same reason Samsung’s case isn’t, a flat face reads better through a mask and seals better against water pressure. The watch auto-detects submersion and logs depth, time and temperature on its own, while a dedicated Mares app arriving later this year unlocks ascent tracking and safe dive limits. Samsung says that partnership stays exclusive to the Ultra2 for two years, which is a long runway on Wear OS. All of that ships for $699.99, a full $100 under Apple’s Ultra 3, in a case that’s now thinner than Apple’s too.

None of this makes the Ultra2 a subtle watch, and it was never trying to be one. What it proves is that Samsung finally stopped treating “rugged” as a synonym for “thick,” which is a harder engineering problem than adding another millimeter of titanium ever was. Whether the Mares app actually delivers a usable dive computer later this year will decide if that squircle earns its keep beyond marketing slides. Until then, the case shape stops looking like a stubborn styling choice and starts looking like the reason the rest of this watch works at all.

The post Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Ultra2 Is Now Thinner Than the Apple Watch Ultra 3, and Its Battery Still Grew 35% first appeared on Yanko Design.

The 5 Details Every Great EDC Design Shares in 2026

Posted on by

Cheap knives and great knives can share a steel type, a similar price bracket, and even a similar silhouette, yet one gets carried every day for years while the other sits in a drawer after a month. The difference rarely comes down to one dramatic failure. It comes down to five small decisions that most buyers never learn to check for, decisions about lock geometry, screw heads, pivot bearings, dimensional proportion, and low-light findability. Spend enough time with a stack of 2026 releases side by side and the pattern gets impossible to unsee.

I spent the better part of last week breaking down those five decisions using five knives currently earning their keep in pockets around the EDC community, each one chosen because it executes a single detail without compromise. None of these are the flashiest releases of the year, and none needed to be. What ties them together is a kind of restraint, the willingness to spend real machining time and material cost on a part of the knife most buyers never think to inspect. A locking mechanism gets tuned for years of one-handed use rather than a flashy debut video. A screw gets sized and disclosed rather than hidden behind a proprietary driver. That restraint is expensive to execute and easy to skip, which is exactly why so few knives manage all five at once.

1. The Lock: Why Button and Crossbar Mechanisms Made the Liner Lock Feel Dated

Liner locks and frame locks have one quiet flaw nobody talks about until they’ve sliced a thumb pad on a fast close. To fold the blade back down, your fingers have to reach across its path and nudge the lock out of the way, which is fine ninety nine times out of a hundred and a genuine hazard on the hundredth. Button locks and crossbar locks solve this by moving the release off the blade’s line entirely. Press a button or pull a bar mounted on the spine, and the blade drops shut without your fingers ever crossing the edge. It sounds like a minor ergonomic tweak until you realize it’s the same logic that made Benchmade’s AXIS lock a cult favorite for two decades, just freed up for everyone else to build on now that the patent has expired. That single expiration is why crossbar and button locks have exploded across mid-tier knives in the last two years, and why a lock type that used to signal premium exclusivity now signals a maker who’s simply paying attention.

Tekto’s F4 Echo, a collaboration with Zastava Arms USA that leans hard into the gunmaker’s rifle heritage, runs exactly this kind of button lock, and it’s tuned well enough to matter. Press the button and the CPM S35VN blade drops free with none of the mushy half-engagement that plagues cheaper button locks, then a flick of the flipper tab snaps it back open with the same crisp confidence. Closing it is a one-handed motion, thumb on the button, palm rolling the spine shut, no crossed fingers anywhere near the reverse tanto edge. It’s a satisfying click too, the kind that turns into an idle fidget habit whether there’s anything to cut or not. At $199.99 it isn’t chasing budget-tier button locks racing to the bottom on price. It’s proof the mechanism has fully arrived at the mid-tier, executed with a materials upgrade to match, and Tekto clearly built it for people who’ll notice the difference immediately.

Click Here to Buy Now: $170 $199.99 (15% off with code YANKO). Hurry, deal ends in 48-hours! Free FedEx 2Day shipping within the USA.

2. The Pivot: Why Ceramic Bearings Turned Washers Into a Warning Sign

Pull apart any budget folding knife from a decade ago and you’ll almost always find phosphor bronze or Teflon washers wrapped around the pivot, a setup that works fine until grit, lint, or a humid afternoon gets between the layers. Washers rely on flat surface contact, so any contamination turns a smooth flip into a gritty drag that needs a hard wrist snap to force open. Ceramic bearings solve this by replacing that flat contact with a caged ring of hardened balls that roll instead of scrape, cutting friction dramatically and staying consistent even when the knife is dirty. They also can’t rust the way steel bearings eventually do, so a knife that’s been caught in the rain still deploys glassy smooth a year later. This used to be the detail separating a $50 knife from a $300 one, and in 2026 that gap has mostly closed. Once ceramic bearings became cheap to source and simple to cage correctly, there was no honest excuse left for a stiff pivot at any price.

Civivi’s Elementum earned its reputation as the reset button for budget EDC largely by being one of the first sub-$50 folders to ditch washers for a caged ceramic ball bearing pivot outright. The Elementum II carries that same pivot forward while adding a tuned button lock, and the bearing underneath does most of the work on how the knife actually feels in hand. Flick it open and it glides with none of the initial stiffness a washer knife needs to work through, and the closing motion rides that identical smooth pivot rather than some separate mechanism bolted on for the button. At 2.96 inches of Nitro-V steel and under $100 across most configurations, it’s proof the bearing upgrade never had to live exclusively at the premium end of the market. Civivi more or less forced the rest of the budget category to either match that pivot or explain why they hadn’t.

3. The Glow: Why Tritium Slots Separate Findability From Decoration

Tritium vials are sealed glass tubes filled with a radioactive gas that emits a faint, self-powered glow for roughly 25 years with no batteries and no charging required, and EDC makers have been drilling slots for them since around 2020. Plenty of that early adoption was pure theater, vials tucked into handle scales where your palm covers the glow the moment you pick the knife up, or embedded on a blade spine where they serve no purpose beyond looking tactical in a product photo. A well-placed slot solves an actual problem instead. Drop a knife in a dark bag, a glove box, or beside a bed at 2am, and a tritium vial is the difference between patting around blind and spotting a faint green dot exactly where you left it. Vials run $15 to $40 each, so a maker adding two of them made a deliberate call. Decoration gets bolted on wherever there’s leftover space, while findability gets placed exactly where your eye needs to land first.

TiNova II puts that logic to its intended use. The two tritium slots sit on the flat faces of its Grade 5 titanium scales, and depending on the finish, you get either raw sandblasted titanium letting the glow read plainly or a black-coated version that makes those same vials do most of the visual work in a dark pocket or bag. At 2.54 inches closed and just 59.3 grams, this is a knife built for keychain duty first, exactly the kind of small object that goes missing in a junk drawer or backpack pocket without a locator built in. The D2 steel blade deploys with a 360 degree spin off a ball bearing pivot, more fidget toy than tactical folder, but the tritium slots keep it from being purely a novelty. It’s a genuinely small detail on a genuinely small knife, and it’s exactly the kind of detail that separates a maker thinking about how the object gets used at night from one just checking a spec sheet box.

4. The Footprint: Why 8 Inches Became the Serious EDC’s Sweet Spot

EDC has spent the better part of a decade chasing extremes in either direction, keychain folders under 4 inches closed competing with hard-use tank knives pushing past 9 inches open, both categories treating size as the headline spec. Somewhere in the middle sits a range most serious knives have quietly converged on, an overall open length around 8 to 8.3 inches paired with a blade close to 3.5 inches. That proportion isn’t an accident or a coincidence across brands. It’s large enough to give a full four-finger grip real purchase on the handle, yet compact enough to disappear into a front pocket without printing through the fabric or announcing itself in a waistband. The blade length lands right at the edge most carry jurisdictions still consider reasonable, long enough for food prep, package handling, and cordage work without crossing into knife-you-have-to-explain territory. Novelty chases a headline number. Dimensional maturity chases the number that actually gets carried every day.

Tactile Knife Co.’s Maverick sits almost exactly on that mark, running 8.18 inches open with a 4.7 inch closed length and a 3.5 inch CPM MagnaCut blade that splits the difference between edge retention and rust resistance better than almost anything at this price. Richard Rogers designed the knife’s tri-lobe handle shape specifically to fill a full-size hand without adding bulk, and the crossbar lock keeps the release off the blade’s path the same way the better button locks do, so drawing and closing it one-handed never feels like a negotiation. At 3.9 ounces in titanium, it carries with enough presence to feel substantial without dragging a pocket down, which is the entire argument for this dimensional range in one knife. Tactile built it in Dallas alongside its better-known pen line, and the proportions read like a team that already understood exactly where the size ceiling for daily carry actually sits.

5. The Fastener: Why Torx Screws Signal a Maker That Expects You to Stick Around

A screw head sounds like the last thing worth judging a knife on, but it quietly tells you how a maker feels about your relationship with the tool over the next decade. Torx resists cam-out under torque, distributes pressure evenly across the star pattern, and doesn’t strip the way a Phillips head does after the third disassembly. Cheaper knives lean on Phillips because the drivers are everywhere, or worse, they use a proprietary bit tucked into a tiny plastic bag that gets lost within a month, quietly forcing you back to the store when the pivot finally needs a clean. The real tell in 2026 isn’t whether a knife uses Torx at all, since most premium builds do by now. It’s whether the maker actually tells you the size. A listed T6 or T8 is an invitation to keep the knife running for years. A vague “tool included” is a maker who’s already planning for you to lose it and buy another knife instead.

Tekto builds the A2 Badger around that same philosophy, running Torx head screws visible on all four corners of the chamfered aluminum handle rather than hiding the hardware or pressing it in permanently. That transparency matters more than usual here, since the Badger is an OTF, a mechanism with more moving parts than a standard folder and one that benefits from an owner who’s actually willing to open it up and relube the slide over time. At 2.18 ounces with a titanium coated D2 blade under two inches, the Badger was built specifically to slip past the length restrictions that plague OTF knives in restrictive states, and Tekto backs that engineering with a full warranty against material or manufacturing defects. Standard Torx hardware on every corner means an owner can actually service the thing rather than just carry it until something inside finally gives out. It’s a small, unglamorous decision, and it’s exactly the kind that separates a knife built to last from one built to sell once.

Click Here to Buy Now: $119 $139.99 (15% off). Hurry, deal ends in 48-hours! Free FedEx 2Day shipping within the USA.

The post The 5 Details Every Great EDC Design Shares in 2026 first appeared on Yanko Design.

Paper MacBook Pro: Apple’s Thinnest Redesign Now Targeting 2027, Not 2026

Posted on by

For the last several years, the Mac’s biggest leaps have come from the silicon inside it. Apple’s M-series chips transformed the MacBook Pro into a class leader on performance per watt, and for a while that made the chassis feel almost settled, a familiar shell for ever more capable internals. The latest roadmap chatter suggests that phase is ending. Apple is reportedly preparing a routine M6 refresh for late 2026, while saving the far more interesting MacBook Pro overhaul for the first half of 2027, the one many are already framing as the “Paper MacBook Pro.”

That nickname works because it instantly communicates the ambition. The idea is not literally a MacBook made of paper, but a MacBook Pro pushed so far into thinness that it starts to feel closer to a design sketch than a finished computer. If the reports are accurate, 2027 is when Apple plans to cash in on that image with a redesigned body and an OLED display, a combination that points to the company’s slimmest Pro notebook yet. For Apple, this would be a familiar kind of flex, turning thinness into theater, then selling the engineering behind that theater as the real product.

Designer: Apple

OLED is what makes the whole concept believable. A MacBook Pro display built around OLED can be thinner than the current mini-LED setup because it does not need the same backlight structure behind the panel. That gives Apple more room to slim down the lid, and once the display stack gets thinner, the rest of the machine can follow. This is why the 2027 model matters more than the late 2026 one. The M6 refresh may keep the lineup current, but the OLED redesign is the part that changes what the MacBook Pro looks like, feels like, and signals from across a room.

The catch is that every millimeter Apple removes has to come from somewhere. A thinner MacBook Pro sounds beautiful until the tradeoffs enter the conversation. Ports are the first obvious pressure point, because HDMI, SD card slots, and even MagSafe all take up physical depth. Then there is the battery, which depends on volume, and the cooling system, which depends on space and airflow. Apple can offset some of that with more efficient chips and smarter internal packaging, but industrial design always collects its price eventually. The “Paper MacBook Pro” only becomes a win if it stays recognizably Pro in the ways that matter after the keynote ends.

That is what makes this rumored 2027 machine so interesting from a design perspective. Apple already knows how to make a thin laptop. It has done that before, sometimes brilliantly, and sometimes with compromises that aged badly. Making a thin MacBook Air is one challenge. Making a thin MacBook Pro that creators, editors, developers, and power users can trust for sustained work is a much harder brief. The real test of this redesign will not be the side profile in Apple’s launch images. It will be whether the machine can carry all that visual elegance without hollowing out the practicality that gives the Pro line its identity.

So what should people expect in 2027? Probably a MacBook Pro that looks noticeably slimmer, likely leans on OLED as the enabling technology, and arrives with the kind of visual lightness Apple loves to turn into a headline. They should also expect compromises to become part of the conversation the moment the design appears. That tension is the whole story here. The “Paper MacBook Pro” has the potential to be one of Apple’s most striking laptop redesigns in years, but only if the company proves that shaving down the body does not also shave away the reasons professionals buy a MacBook Pro in the first place.

The post Paper MacBook Pro: Apple’s Thinnest Redesign Now Targeting 2027, Not 2026 first appeared on Yanko Design.