Author Archives: Sarang Sheth

This AirPods Open concept puts Apple’s famous stem behind your ear

Posted on by

Apple has a long habit of showing up late to the party and somehow leaving with everyone’s attention. It wasn’t first to MP3 players, smartwatches, or wireless earbuds, and it did fine with all three. Open earbuds might be the next party it’s running late for. Nothing, Bose, Huawei, Anker, and a pile of Chinese brands like Sanag and Baseus have been selling ear hooks and ear clips for a while now, and Shokz just more than doubled its shipments year over year. Designer Anurag Sarda has a theory on what Apple’s entrance could look like, and he calls it AirPods Open.

Sarda, an industrial designer based in Helsinki, takes the AirPods 4 bud and gives it a glossy white hook that loops over the ear. Apple’s signature stem survives, relocated to the end of the hook where it dangles behind your earlobe like a tiny tail. The bud sits angled just above the ear canal, so your music gets in without shutting the world out. Funnily enough, Apple already calls its tipless AirPods “open-ear,” and the new AirPods 5 even claim the industry’s best ANC in that design. Sarda’s concept takes the word literally, and frankly, that’s the version I’d want on my ears.

Designer: Anurag Sarda

Apple’s Most Famous Stem Gets a New Spot Behind Your Ear

The bud comes straight from AirPods 4, right down to the black mesh grille and the little pill-shaped vent beside it. From there, a soft hook arcs over the top of your ear and drops down behind it, ending in a section that looks exactly like a classic AirPods stem. A visible seam separates that stem from the hook, so it reads as its own module rather than a tacked-on detail. Pinch one between two fingers and it forms a near-perfect question mark, which feels on the nose for a product asking why Apple hasn’t made it yet. It already looks ready for an Apple Store display table.

Hook earbuds usually hide a battery pod behind the ear to counterbalance the driver up front, and Sarda’s relocated stem sits in exactly that spot. Nothing even markets its Ear (open) around a “three-point balance system” for the same reason. The difference is that Apple’s pod would already be famous. Everyone from your aunt to your barista can spot an AirPods stem across a room, and since those stems already pack microphones and battery cells, the engineering logic carries over neatly. The case follows suit, nesting both hooks in mirrored loops around the buds with the stems meeting at the hinge like two commas holding hands.

The Open-Ear Crowd Apple Would Be Walking Into

Nothing Ear (open) is the closest cousin, a $149 hook design with 0.29-ounce (8.1-gram) buds and a nickel-titanium wire inside the hook that lets it flex and spring back. Sarda knows that brand’s playbook well, having already designed the Nothing Gamepad (1), a controller concept built around glyph LEDs. Bose went the clip route instead, and its Ultra Open Earbuds (2nd Gen) arrived this fall at $299. Huawei covers both camps with the hook-style FreeArc and the clip-style FreeClip 2, which sells for £179 (roughly $240) in the UK and isn’t officially sold in the US. Clips read more like jewelry while hooks feel more locked in, and Sarda clearly picked a side.

Apple already owns half of this idea through Beats, whose $249.99 Powerbeats Pro 2 use a nickel-titanium hook tested for more than 1,500 hours with nearly 1,000 athletes. The catch is that Powerbeats seal your ear canal with silicone tips, which makes them gym gear more than all-day wear. Meanwhile the AirPods 5, announced in September, keep the tipless fit and add ANC, so Apple already knows how to make an open bud sound good and block out the bus. Sarda’s concept essentially staples those two products together. Take the Powerbeats hook, drop the tips, bolt on an AirPods bud, and you’ve got something Apple’s supply chain could probably prototype by lunch.

Ternus’s Apple Is Suddenly Ready to Try New Things

John Ternus took over as Apple CEO on September 1, and the company has been on a launch tear ever since. In his first two months, Apple unveiled its first foldable phone, the iPhone Duo, plus a touchscreen MacBook Pro and its first smart home hub, the $299 HomeView. It also co-designed the Apple Home Collection with LG and Schneider Electric, a lineup of cameras, locks, thermostats, and a video doorbell. Apple building smart locks with LG would have sounded like fan fiction two years ago. Ternus is a mechanical engineer who spent 25 years in Apple hardware, and the company suddenly seems far more willing to try new shapes.

That appetite is exactly what makes AirPods Open feel plausible instead of wishful. Open earbuds are where the growth is, and Omdia expects the category to reach 90.5 million units a year by 2030. Apple has the hook from Beats, the bud from AirPods 5, and a CEO who apparently enjoys a new product category. Sarda’s renders even come with campaign-ready taglines like “Always on, never in,” which honestly reads better than half of Apple’s real ones. If Apple does show up late to this party again, I’d bet good money it walks in wearing something very close to this.

The post This AirPods Open concept puts Apple’s famous stem behind your ear first appeared on Yanko Design.

iPhone Duo 2 images leak online, hinting at a 3-camera setup and even thinner body

Posted on by

Apple’s first foldable has been on shelves for about two weeks, and the internet has already moved on to the sequel. A purported prototype of the iPhone Duo 2 surfaced on X this week, posted by leaker Majin Bu, with three cameras on the back instead of two. That could mean a telephoto lens, the most obvious omission on the $1,999 original. I have one pressing question, though. What do we even call this thing? The Duo Duo? The Duo Trio, in honor of all three lenses?

Naming crisis aside, the image shows the same pill-shaped camera module as the current Duo, stretched a little longer to fit the extra lens. Apple’s foldable measures 0.2 inches (5.2mm) unfolded, so expanding the bump sideways seems a sensible choice, though the photo doesn’t establish its thickness. Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman has separately reported that Duo 2 prototypes are testing Face ID tucked under the outer display, which would address another conspicuous omission. The photo remains unverified, and the phone isn’t expected until the second half of 2027. If the reports hold up, Apple appears to be tackling two of the first Duo’s biggest gaps.

Image Credits: Majin Bu (X)

Stretching the Pill to Fit a Telephoto

A telephoto camera needs room for its optics and sensor. That’s a tough ask on a phone measuring 0.2 inches (5.2mm) unfolded and 0.44 inches (11.3mm) when folded. The purported prototype shows a longer camera module, but it tells us little about how the hardware might fit inside. The iPhone Duo already shares its A20 Pro chip with the triple-camera iPhone 18 Pro. Squeezing in a third camera without turning a slim foldable into a brick with a hinge is a separate challenge.

The iPhone 7 Plus introduced Apple’s first telephoto lens in 2016, and the iPhone 11 Pro made the triple-camera bump the Pro standard three years later. A third camera on the Duo would follow that playbook, with the foldable catching up to the Pro line one generation in. Samsung, meanwhile, is heading the other way. The $1,899.99 Galaxy Z Fold8 dropped its telephoto entirely, leaving 3x optical zoom to the $2,099.99 Z Fold8 Ultra, which pairs it with a 200MP main sensor and a 50MP ultra-wide. If the extra camera is a telephoto, the Duo 2 would offer the same main, ultra-wide, and telephoto arrangement as Samsung’s pricier foldable while undercutting it on price, assuming that $1,999 tag survives.

Face ID, an Action Button, and Apple’s Favorite Sequel Trick

Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reported in October that Duo 2 prototypes are testing Face ID hidden beneath the outer display. That would mean tucking facial-recognition hardware, including an infrared camera and flood illuminator, under the screen itself. The current Duo relies on Touch ID in the power button, a familiar solution that still feels like a step back on a $1,999 iPhone. Gurman also says Apple is weighing an Action button, which the first Duo skipped. He cautions that neither feature is locked in, and Face ID could slip to the third-generation model if development runs late.

Fixing the first version’s biggest gaps is a familiar Apple sequel move. The iPhone 3G added the 3G connectivity and GPS the 2007 original lacked, and the Apple Watch Series 2 followed the first watch with built-in GPS and swim-proofing. A Duo 2 with a telephoto and Face ID would fit that pattern, giving buyers two familiar iPhone features missing from the first foldable. The rumored launch is still roughly a year out, so expect plenty more leaks before Apple says a word. My vote for the name stays the same, though, because the Duo Trio has a nice ring to it.

The post iPhone Duo 2 images leak online, hinting at a 3-camera setup and even thinner body first appeared on Yanko Design.

Buy the printer, make the presents: Snapmaker’s U1 drops to $699 for Black Friday

Posted on by

The Snapmaker U1 drops to $699 this Black Friday, down 30% from its $999 list price, and it might be the smartest buy on your holiday list, mostly because it can make plenty of the gifts on it. The U1 is a four-toolhead 3D printer that prints in up to four colors or materials in a single go. That covers personalized ornaments, figurines, and fidget toys, all printed in multicolor on your desk. It ships with four spools of PLA and 30 ready-to-print models, so after unboxing and automatic calibration, you can print your first model on day one. A good chunk of your Christmas list, sorted.

Four-head printers are rare at this price. Tool changers like the Prusa XL have historically cost well north of $2,000. Snapmaker’s SnapSwap system keeps four print heads loaded and swaps between them in about five seconds, while single-nozzle setups like Bambu’s AMS flush filament at every color change. Fewer purges mean faster prints and, by Snapmaker’s count, up to 85% less wasted plastic. More than 20,000 Kickstarter backers already bought in, making the U1 the most-funded 3D printer campaign in the platform’s history, with now more than 150,000 users worldwide.

Designer: Snapmaker

Click Here to Buy Now: Black Friday Sale. Hurry, deal ends soon!

Five-Second Swaps and a Lot Less Printer Poop

Each of the U1’s four print heads sits docked and preheated with its own filament. When a print calls for a new color, the printer parks the active head and grabs the next one. A steel-ball coupling and a mechanical lock seat each head in the exact same spot every time, and Snapmaker says the mechanism survived over a million continuous swaps with zero mechanical failures. The printer then auto-calibrates all four heads to within 0.04mm (about 0.0016 inches) of each other. That keeps the white trim on a Santa hat right where it belongs.

Single-nozzle printers handle color changes by shoving the old filament out until the new one runs clean. Snapmaker pegs that process at roughly two minutes per swap, and on a busy multicolor model the purged plastic can outweigh the model itself. The U1 only purges small amounts at the start of a job and during calibration. Print a tray of four-color ornaments and those savings stack up fast, in both hours and filament. Your filament budget ends up on the tree instead of in the trash.

A Personalized Ornament, From Download to Gift Box

Four heads can hold four different materials as easily as four colors, so flexible TPU or dissolvable supports can share a print with rigid plastic. For most holiday gifts, though, four colors of PLA do the heavy lifting. Snapmaker’s Full Spectrum feature stretches that palette by stacking thin alternating layers of your four filaments, which your eye reads as new in-between shades. Results depend on the filament, the model’s shape, and your settings, so a quick test print helps. Load red, green, white, and gold, and you’ve basically got Christmas in a box.

Personalizing a gift takes about as much skill as sending a text. Open an ornament model in Snapmaker Orca, add a name with the slicer’s text tool, and assign one of your four colors to each part. A palm-sized ornament uses only a few grams of filament, so each one costs pocket change in plastic. Hit print, and the U1 handles every color swap on its own while you get on with your evening. Repeat for each name on your list, and nobody else at the party will show up with those.

Smart Enough for First-Timers, Cheap Enough for Black Friday

Snapmaker Space, the company’s model library (currently in open beta), offers ready-to-print multicolor models, so beginners can skip 3D modeling entirely. Auto bed leveling helps your first layer stick, and input shaping reduces vibration for smoother walls, with speeds topping out at 500mm/s (about 20 inches per second). Filament loads itself, RFID tags on Snapmaker spools fill in settings for you, and Backup Mode switches to a matching spool when one runs dry. A built-in camera with AI monitoring can flag spaghetti failures and ping your phone. Tinkerers get Klipper firmware and OrcaSlicer support.

Click Here to Buy Now: Black Friday Sale. Hurry, deal ends soon!

The post Buy the printer, make the presents: Snapmaker’s U1 drops to $699 for Black Friday first appeared on Yanko Design.

Salvador Dalí’s melting clocks are now a 3D LEGO diorama, ants included

Posted on by

MoMA owns The Starry Night, The Persistence of Memory, and a set of LEGO bricks designed by Godtfred Kirk Christiansen in the 1950s. The museum brought two of those together in 2022, when it partnered with LEGO on the Starry Night set that grew out of a LEGO Ideas submission. A new Ideas project wants to complete the triangle. BrickRelativity has rebuilt Salvador Dalí’s 1931 painting of melting clocks as a 3D brick diorama, complete with the dead tree, the ant-covered watch, and the weird sleeping figure sprawled across the beach. If MoMA wanted a sequel, it wouldn’t even need to leave the building.

Dalí’s original is tiny, just 9.5 by 13 inches (24 by 33 cm), which catches plenty of first-time visitors off guard. The brick version spreads the scene across a black display base with a gallery plaque and a sky built from horizontal bands of blue, aqua, and sunset-yellow plates. BrickRelativity says the central blob was one of the toughest challenges, since soft, shapeless forms and rigid LEGO elements get along about as well as cats and bathtubs. The clocks came a close second, their faces rebuilt from tile grids that warp along with the melt. LEGO Art has already worked through Hokusai, Van Gogh, and Monet, so Surrealism feels overdue.

Designer: BrickRelativity

Three clocks melt across the scene, and each gets its own construction trick. The one hanging off the tree branch wears a pearl-silver bezel that folds over the wood, with a small silver ball at its lowest point standing in for the drip. The pocket watch sliding off the orange ledge swaps silver for pearl-gold tube elements that kink around corners, with a transparent fly perched on its face. The third clock drapes over the sleeping figure in the middle, following the curve of the body underneath it. Numerals were applied as decals directly to the curved surfaces, while every clock hand is built from LEGO elements.

My favorite detail, though, is the face of that gold pocket watch. BrickRelativity built it from a grid of light-blue tiles, and as the face slumps over the ledge, the seams between them bend with it. The result looks like graph paper caught in a heat wave. The grid also gives the numerals a place to sit and recalls the stud-by-stud mosaics of LEGO Art, now visibly coming apart. A warped coordinate system feels very Einstein, which is funny, because Dalí insisted his soft watches came from cheese rather than relativity.

Dalí reportedly based the sleeping figure on a rock formation at Cap de Creus, and it’s generally read as a squashed self-portrait. BrickRelativity layered curved slopes in tan and pale flesh tones until the blob looked properly boneless. Dark gray bars and curves form a closed eye with long lashes, and a wing-like membrane of stacked plates trails off behind it. Back on the ledge, the closed orange pocket watch is a ring of curved elements with a little crown nub. A cluster of tiny ants made from dark clip plates swarms its lid, turning Dalí’s recurring symbol of decay into a minifig-scale infestation.

The landscape skips a printed backdrop entirely. Horizontal bands of blue, aqua, pale yellow, and orange plates build up the sunset sky. The Cap de Creus cliffs on the right use stepped wedges and slopes in tan, dark tan, orange, and gray, placed at different depths to make the coastline recede. Dark brown tiles cover the beach, with patches of exposed studs breaking up the flat surface like scrubby ground. Viewed head-on, that depth collapses back into the painting’s flat composition. BrickRelativity has some practice with perspective tricks: previous Ideas projects turned M.C. Escher’s impossible staircases into bricks.

Down in the front corner, a tiny Dalí minifig with swept gray hair, a patterned tie, and that famous upturned mustache paints at an easel holding a miniature copy of the painting. It’s a direct callback to the Van Gogh minifig and easel that shipped with the Starry Night set. A black base and a small plaque bearing the artist’s name, the title, and the year finish the gallery look. Fan builders have been chasing this museum energy all year, from a 1,117-piece Picasso portrait to a Brick Dangerous melting clock that just qualified for LEGO’s third 2026 review. Dalí’s copyright is managed by the Fundació Gala-Salvador Dalí, so any official version would need the estate’s blessing.

The project currently sits at 1,849 supporters, with 602 days left to hit the next milestone of 5,000. LEGO Ideas lets fans submit builds and rack up supporters, and projects that reach 10,000 move on to LEGO’s official review for a shot at becoming a real set. You can head to the LEGO Ideas page and give BrickRelativity your vote, which costs nothing but a LEGO account. Dalí already turned this painting into floating bricks once, in his 1954 sequel The Disintegration of the Persistence of Memory. Seems only fair to let someone finish the job properly, with clutch power this time.

The post Salvador Dalí’s melting clocks are now a 3D LEGO diorama, ants included first appeared on Yanko Design.

The P1 Terminal is the Severance computer I’d actually want to use

Posted on by

Severance did something no tech company has managed in decades: it made people want a trackball again. The MDR terminals on Lumon’s severed floor, with their cream shells, tiny glowing screens, and built-in trackballs, have become weird objects of desire for a show about corporate horror. Designer Shaun Wellens has dreamed up the computer I imagine Lumon would roll out for its next rebrand. The P1 Terminal is a CGI concept from a made-up 1970s company called Push / Pull, designed as a shared computer for people living in a communal space. It has a soft white clamshell body, a phosphor-style display, and a blue trackball that looks good enough to lick (please don’t).

Wellens says the P1 was inspired by a computer used to support experiments aboard the Space Shuttle, which makes sense once you notice the clamshell form. Then he wraps the whole thing in fake history. In his story, the P1 launched in 1972 for people living in underground communities called “pockets,” where it handled mail, bulletin boards, and shopping. It sold badly, its users adored it, and it got a sequel, which is basically the life story of every cult-classic gadget ever made. He also admits to sneaking deliberate flaws into his fictional designs so the imaginary engineers can fix them in the next version, and I love that level of commitment.

Designer: Shaun Wellens

The shell is a rounded off-white pod, with a sage-gray handle module sitting on top like the carrying grip on a vintage TV. That handle has a recessed slot and a tinted window that recall the iMac G3 and the 1999 clamshell iBook. The open renders show the two halves joined by a stacked metal hinge at the center, the one visibly mechanical part on an otherwise pebble-smooth body. The Space Shuttle inspiration was the GRiD Compass, a magnesium clamshell designed by Bill Moggridge that flew aboard Columbia in 1983 as the Shuttle Portable Onboard Computer, or SPOC.

Inside the lid sits a dark, rounded-rectangle display with cyan-green text that recalls an old phosphor CRT. A camera pokes through a tiny notch at the top center, which is a hilarious thing to find on a computer that supposedly shipped in 1972. Perforated speaker grilles flank the screen. The interface boots to a pixel-font “hello” and drops you into a numbered menu of services, a text-only setup that would sit comfortably next to a Lumon file full of scary numbers. Wellens calls it a lightning-fast graphical interface anyway. In his fictional timeline, it arrived a full year before the Xerox Alto, the pioneering 1973 GUI computer.

The bottom half is a dark oval tray holding a full keyboard, with the blue trackball parked dead center below the keys. That ball is the loudest color on the entire product, and it deserves to be. Trackballs have appeared in early terminals, arcade cabinets, and Logitech’s TrackMan, while Severance gave them another memorable role on the MDR desks. Putting it in the middle also makes sense for a shared machine, since lefties and righties get equal access. The oval keyboard looks a little cramped at the edges, but it matches the pebble shell so neatly that I’m happy to call it one of his intentional flaws.

A chunky, multi-jointed arm that looks borrowed from a robotics lab supports the terminal. It’s designed to let the P1 swing out, tilt, and tuck away, useful movements for a shared machine in a cramped communal space. In one render, the cable drops in from above, suggesting a ceiling- or wall-mounted setup like a dental lamp waiting for its next patient. Residents could walk up, pull it down, check their mail, and push it back, which might explain the Push / Pull name (my theory, Wellens hasn’t confirmed it). That setup makes the P1 feel closer to a payphone or a library catalog terminal than a personal computer.

Wellens’ conceptual history lands surprisingly close to the real thing. In August 1973, the Community Memory Project put a public bulletin board terminal in Leopold’s Records in Berkeley, with later terminals appearing in libraries and laundromats around town. A decade later, France was distributing free Minitel terminals that let people shop, bank, and message each other from home. The service lasted until 2012. The P1 mashes both ideas into one glossy pod for people living underground. Wellens even mocked up a period magazine ad with a big serif headline over a violet product shot, and it’s convincing enough that I briefly wanted to mail away for one.

Severance production designer Jeremy Hindle already gave us the most covetable fake office tech on television, so consider this a friendly nudge. Somebody on the show’s crew should get Wellens on the phone, because the P1 looks like a terminal Lumon would install somewhere much friendlier than the Break Room. He has form here too, having already dreamed up the Kriket 3000, a pastel retro robot that would look right at home wandering the severed floor’s hallways. The guy clearly loves building machines for a timeline that never happened, which is more or less the Lumon design brief. Hire him, throw him a waffle party, and let him build whatever strange hardware the next season needs.

The post The P1 Terminal is the Severance computer I’d actually want to use first appeared on Yanko Design.

The “Desktop 95” Watch is a love-letter to the greatest Windows OS of all time

Posted on by

There was a time when a computer’s biggest annoyance was a progress bar inching slowly or a dial-up modem screeching and hissing its way online. Nobody pinged you on Teams, Copilot didn’t offer to rewrite your emails, and the worst thing your PC could do was crash in the middle of Solitaire. Benlywatch’s Desktop 95 bottles that era and straps it to your wrist. The limited-edition analog watch puts a Windows 95-style desktop on its dial, complete with teal wallpaper, beveled windows, and a dialog box that reads “Loading memories…” Honestly, that progress bar is the most accurate thing anyone has written about millennials.

Two pixel cursors serve as the hands, a SYSTEM “Ready” dialog sits near the center, and a taskbar runs along the bottom of the dial. It all lives in a 39mm-wide, 10mm-thick case made from 316L stainless steel, with a Swiss quartz movement and a 5 ATM water-resistance rating. You get a blue or white dial with a leather strap, Milanese mesh, or steel bracelet, plus a numbered caseback. The edition is limited to 500 pieces. Pre-orders are open at $159, with shipping slated for November 2026. The only notification it will ever send you is the time.

Designer: Benly Watch

Pixel Cursor Hands and Two Desktop Dials

One hand is a classic arrow pointer, and the other is the little pointing hand that appeared whenever you hovered over a link. Together they move around the dial telling the time, which is the most productive thing a cursor has done since the invention of the screensaver. Everything else on the dial stays put. On the blue version, an ARCHIVE window with File, Edit, and View menus holds WORK, PHOTOS, and NOTES icons, while DESK, SAVE, and FILES shortcuts line the left edge. Chunky pixel numerals mark 12, 3, 6, and 9, and the taskbar reads MENU, ARCHIVE, and READY, speaker icon included.

The white dial swaps teal for a creamy beige and renames the main window DESKTOP, with COMPUTER, FILES, and DISK icons and a simpler “Loading…” bar. Its numerals almost disappear into the background, so it looks like a screenshot someone shrank down and laminated. I like that the two dials feel like two moods of the same machine. Blue is the cheerful default everybody remembers from the family PC. White is the office computer in accounting that never got its wallpaper changed. Both keep that SYSTEM “Ready” box parked near the center like a promise.

The Windows 95 Design Behind the Dial

Windows 95 launched on August 24, 1995, backed by a $300 million marketing push, a launch event hosted by Jay Leno, and people lining up at midnight to buy an operating system. Its startup sound was composed by Brian Eno, which remains a wild sentence to type. The interface reflected the work of a design team led by Virginia Howlett, a painter by training. Those teals, royal blues, and medium grays came partly from the limited color palettes of graphics cards at the time. Hardware limits, basically, turned into an aesthetic people now pay money to recreate.

Three decades later, Windows comes with Copilot, Teams, and a Solitaire that serves you ads, and Howlett herself has called the Windows 95 years a “kinder, gentler time.” The Desktop 95 taps into that feeling. It’s a desktop with no updates, no pop-ups to dismiss, and no assistant asking how it can help. The only thing missing is Clippy, though in fairness he didn’t arrive until Office 97, and the dial is probably better off without a backseat driver.

Case Specs, Pricing, and Availability

The case measures 39mm across and 44.5mm long, and at 10mm thick it should slip under a shirt cuff without a fight. It’s made from 316L stainless steel, with a matching steel caseback engraved with the Desktop 95 name and an individual edition number. The leather strap is 20mm wide and fits wrists from 5.3 to 8.1 inches (13.5 to 20.5cm), with Milanese mesh and steel bracelet versions also available. Inside is a Swiss quartz movement, which suits the theme, because nobody in 1995 wanted to wind anything except a VHS tape. Water resistance is rated at 5 ATM.

Most of Benlywatch’s catalog is retro-futurist digital hardware with OLED and LCD screens, from the Cybertruck-inspired Future Warrior to its 1970s-style Stargazer. The Desktop 95 takes a different approach, recreating a screen on an analog dial. It’s listed at $159 on pre-order through Benlywatch’s website, limited to 500 pieces, with shipping expected in November 2026. Free worldwide shipping is included, and the brand covers import taxes and duties.

The post The “Desktop 95” Watch is a love-letter to the greatest Windows OS of all time first appeared on Yanko Design.

Hal Jordan has to recharge his ring, but the NoxTi titanium EDC lantern glows for decades

Posted on by

Every Green Lantern has the same annoying chore. Once a day, the ring needs a top-up, so our cosmic cop has to press his fist against a glowing green lantern and recite a whole poem before it’ll charge. Imagine your iPhone demanding spoken word every night before you plug it in.

Xedge’s NoxTi TRI skips the ritual. It’s a pocket-sized lantern in Grade 5 titanium that hangs off your keys or around your neck, with three glow tubes tucked inside. Fit it with tritium tubes and it glows without charging, a switch, or poetry, slowly dimming over a couple of decades. Prefer something non-radioactive? Photoluminescent tubes absorb light and glow after dark. Hal would be jealous.

Designer: Xedge

Click Here to Buy $35 $55 (36% off). Hurry, only a few left! Raised over $81,000.

Three Tubes, One Glowing Core

NoxTi TRI holds three 3 x 22.5mm glow tubes spaced 120 degrees apart to keep the glow visible from more angles, whether the capsule is dangling from a keyring or lying in a cupholder. The tubes sit in a custom carrier made of optical-grade PMMA acrylic, for which Xedge claims around 97 percent light transmission. The carrier is designed to use total internal reflection to distribute the light, making the three tubes appear as one luminous core behind the titanium windows.

Six colors are on the menu: Apple Green, Ice Blue, Ocean Blue, Red, Violet, and Sunset Orange. Run one across all three slots for a uniform glow, or mix them. Yes, that means three Lantern Corps on one keyring. Tritium is the set-and-forget option. Its half-life is about 12 years, so the glow gradually dims rather than switching off, with Xedge describing a usable lifespan of about two decades. That’s still a better deal than any battery I own. The tritium is sealed inside glass vials, and Xedge reports a radiation-meter reading of 0.07 µSv/h. Photoluminescent tubes are the cheaper, non-radioactive option, recharging through exposure to light.

Titanium Outside, Shock Absorbers Inside

The shell is CNC-machined from Grade 5 titanium, an alloy also used in aircraft parts and bone implants. Its corrosion resistance should suit the sweat and daily handling of life on a crowded keyring. It measures 47mm long and 14.3mm across, and weighs 15.8 grams, roughly the weight of three US nickels. Inside, a quartz sleeve surrounds the glowing core to help keep dust out and the view clear, while O-rings seal the threaded body. Xedge says it tested the design at temperatures from minus 20°C to 100°C. It comes in sandblasted raw titanium or a stealthier Black DLC finish. I’d pick the black, purely because the glow stands out more against it.

The more interesting detail is how the design cushions those glass tubes. Each one rests on a 3mm silicone ball, and a stainless steel spring under the core is intended to absorb jolts from dropped keys or a swinging pendant. That spring sits on a magnetic base to help keep it in place when you unscrew the body to swap tubes, reducing the chance of tiny parts bouncing across the kitchen floor. A machined Tri-Index Cap keeps all three tubes aligned with their windows. Xedge says every component is accessible and replaceable, giving the titanium shell a chance to outlive several sets of tubes.

Wear It, Clip It, Break Glass With It

The attachment hole at the top takes a split ring, a quick-release clip, or a chain, so the TRI can live on your keys, hang off a bag zipper, dangle from a phone strap, or ride around your neck as a pendant. The kit supports both single-tube and triple-tube setups, so you can switch between them. On the opposite end sits a ceramic glass-breaker bead, intended for breaking car windows in an emergency, which I sincerely hope nobody ever needs. Keep expectations calibrated, though: this is a locator glow for finding your keys or bag in the dark. It won’t light up a trail.

The NoxTi TRI Kickstarter campaign lists a retail price of about $55 (HK$429) per unit. Pledge pricing starts at $35 for the launch special, followed by $39 for Super Early Bird and $45 for Early Bird, with two-packs from $65 and a four-pack at $119. Glow tubes are separate add-ons: tritium costs $20 per tube or $60 for three, while photoluminescent tubes are $7 each or $15 for three. Extras include the Black DLC upgrade ($15), a stainless steel necklace ($12), a titanium quick-release clip ($15), and titanium split rings ($12 for three). Shipping is listed as free worldwide, with deliveries planned for February 2027. Xedge hasn’t published warranty terms yet.

Click Here to Buy $35 $55 (36% off). Hurry, only a few left! Raised over $81,000.

The post Hal Jordan has to recharge his ring, but the NoxTi titanium EDC lantern glows for decades first appeared on Yanko Design.

Jackery shrank its power station into a 96Wh cube with 140W USB-C

Posted on by

Jackery’s new Explorer 100D looks like it should play AM radio. The squat little cube has a framed front panel, orange slatted vents down its sides, and a webbing strap you’d expect on a vintage transistor set. Instead of tuning into ballgames, it stores 96Wh of energy and delivers up to 158W across two USB-C ports and one USB-A port. It measures 4.67 by 3.25 by 3.37 inches (11.9 x 8.3 x 8.6cm), making it roughly softball-sized, and weighs 1.87 pounds (850g). It’s the smallest power station Jackery has ever built.

Jackery’s D-series models skip the AC outlet entirely, and that decision explains much of the design. They don’t need an inverter, a bulky component that generates heat and often requires a cooling fan. Leaving it out lets the box shrink to desk-friendly proportions, while the 96Wh battery sits just below the FAA’s 100Wh threshold for batteries carried without airline approval. Jackery estimates more than four charges for an iPhone 17 or Galaxy S26, or roughly one full recharge for a 14-inch MacBook Pro. That’s a useful reserve in something that weighs less than the laptop it’s charging.

Designer: Jackery

One Button Runs the Whole Show

A TFT display on the front tracks input and output wattage, battery level, and estimated runtime, with additional screens for battery health, cycle count, and internal temperature. One DISPLAY button handles it all. Tap once to flip between status screens, double-tap to keep the screen on or switch it off, and hold for three seconds to enter Low-Power Charging Mode. That last trick is for smartwatches and earbuds. Some power banks stop supplying power when a device draws too little current, leaving you with AirPods stuck at 40%. Jackery’s dedicated mode is designed to keep power flowing to those smaller gadgets.

The screen resembles a car’s instrument cluster, with a circular battery gauge in the middle and input and output readouts flanking it. A glossy, framed front panel groups the display and ports into a single face, which is where the transistor-radio vibe comes from. Port labels are printed directly on the panel, and a small bracket under the two USB-C ports marks their 140W maximum. The horizontal vent slats carry Jackery’s signature orange. Four rubber feet help keep it steady on a café table, and the strap fastens to round studs on either side.

140 Watts That Fit in a Tote Bag

The USB-C ports offer up to 140W and support three fast-charging protocols: USB Power Delivery (PD), Programmable Power Supply (PPS), and Adjustable Voltage Supply (AVS). PD serves modern laptops, PPS fine-tunes voltage for compatible devices, including Samsung phones, and AVS is the newer addition Jackery highlights for Apple gear. Jackery claims the 100D can charge an iPhone 17 to 50% in 21 minutes. Total output across all three ports reaches 158W, allowing a laptop, phone, and pair of earbuds to share it. The 18W USB-A port handles whatever legacy cable is still living in your bag.

Recharging options include a 140W USB-C wall charger, a 100W car charger, or a 100W solar panel. Jackery quotes 1.7 hours from zero to 80% on solar. Car charging supports both 12V and 24V sockets, covering semi-truck cabs as well as hatchbacks. Car and solar charging use a USB-C to DC8020 adapter connected to C1, the only port that accepts input. When charging the battery and powering devices simultaneously, input and output are capped at 100W each, worth knowing if you plan to use it as a desk hub. Jackery rates the LFP cells for 3,000 cycles before capacity drops to 80%, equivalent to more than eight years of daily cycles.

The Pocket-Size Panic Buy

The 100D replaces the Explorer 100 Plus, Jackery’s previous smallest station, with several improvements. Weight drops from 2.13 pounds to 1.87, output climbs from 128W to 158W, and rated cycles rise from 2,000 to 3,000, with a 3Wh reduction in capacity. The one step back: only one USB-C port accepts input, whereas the 100 Plus could charge through either. Anker’s Solix C200 DC is an obvious rival, offering 192Wh for $149. That doubles the energy but exceeds the FAA’s 160Wh upper limit for spare lithium-ion batteries in passenger baggage, ruling it out for air travel.

Walmart is scheduled to start selling the 100D for $99 on November 15, Costco already offers a two-pack for $179.99, and Jackery lists it at $119 on its own site, with sign-ups for preorder alerts. It’s a compact entry into 2026’s power-station panic buy. Large home-backup stations are built to keep appliances running during an outage. The 100D is for the laptop deadline at an airport gate where every outlet is taken, or the campsite with no plug for miles. It’s a power station you might actually use on a Tuesday.

The post Jackery shrank its power station into a 96Wh cube with 140W USB-C first appeared on Yanko Design.

This “Bentley of Bikes” sports 5 layers of paint, and packs a 206Hp engine underneath

Posted on by

Five layers of paint. That’s how many Norton applied to the bodywork of its new Manx R, enough that the engineers had to factor paint thickness into how the panels fit together. It’s the sort of obsessive detail you’d expect from Bentley, and a RevZilla tester floated the “Bentley of bikes” comparison after riding it. The Manx R is the 206-horsepower V4 flagship of Norton’s comeback under TVS Motor, and it’s already rolling into UK and European dealerships. It has also picked up an IDEA Bronze and a Red Dot: Best of the Best this year.

Norton’s in-house team in Solihull designed it under Head of Design Simon Skinner, with Range Rover and Defender design veteran Gerry McGovern steering the creative direction. The surfaces are free of winglets and exposed bolts, with the only visible bodywork fasteners on the front fender. Even the switchgear buttons are metal, a small luxury you can feel every time you use them. Under all that paint sits a new 1,200cc, 72-degree V4 tuned for the midrange, where most real riding happens. The base bike starts at £20,250 (about $27,600) in the UK, with US pricing still under wraps ahead of an expected early 2027 launch.

Designers: Simon Skinner & Gerry McGovern (Norton Motorcycles)

Norton’s original Manx was a racing single built from 1947 to 1962, named after the Isle of Man and its legendary TT. In 1950, it gained the Featherbed frame, designed by Belfast brothers Rex and Cromie McCandless, and riders like Geoff Duke used it to collect world championships and TT wins in the early fifties. Resurrecting that badge carries real pressure, and plenty of brands would have answered it with spoked wheels and a round headlamp. Norton went the other direction entirely, replacing the curvy, retro-tinged V4SV with something sharp and forward-looking. I think that was the right call.

Skinner builds the design around four principles he calls modernity, integration, drama, and connection, and he describes the result as reductive. His favorite explanation compares a new-build estate house with a 20-year-old glass-and-steel home that still looks like it arrived from the future. The Manx R lands firmly in the second camp. Its nose is a smooth, wingless shell with split chevron LED headlights tucked under a tall smoked screen, and the mirror stalks grow straight out of the fairing shoulders. Clean volumes, precise gaps, and reflections define the front end, rather than the winglets and vents found on rival bikes.

Carbon infill panels on each flank frame a window onto the top of the V4, its covers dressed in carbon plates, making the engine part of the display. Three angled gills on the upper fairing vent heat from the electronics, and the repeated-line motif runs across the seat and side panels. Out back, a three-bar LED taillight sits above a stack of black louvers, while the exhaust hides under the belly and the single-sided swingarm leaves the rear wheel fully on show. The fuel cap carries an embossed Manx R badge, a detail most owners will notice at the pump. If I could change one thing, I’d lose those tail louvers, which look a touch like a space heater on an otherwise clean rear end.

Norton rates the V4 at 206 hp at 11,500 rpm and 96 lb-ft at 9,000 rpm. Those peak figures trail a few rivals, which Norton says is deliberate. Its engineers logged roughly 135,000 miles of data on Ducati, Aprilia, and BMW superbikes and found riders spent 99% of their time below 8,000 rpm, so the engine’s tuning prioritizes the middle of the rev range. According to RevZilla, it can run as a 600cc twin at deep lean angles and small throttle openings, and it shuts down the rear cylinders at idle to reduce heat around the rider’s legs. The narrow V layout also helped fit everything into a 56.5-inch (1,435mm) wheelbase.

At the 2026 International Design Excellence Awards, the Manx R took Bronze in Automotive and Transportation, and Norton says it’s the first combustion-engined production motorcycle to win an IDEA. Two months later, it collected Red Dot: Best of the Best in the Design Concept competition, aimed mainly at concepts and prototypes, despite already being in dealerships. Both prizes come from design juries, not lap-time comparisons. The Ducati Panigale V4, Aprilia RSV4, and BMW M 1000 RR all wear visible aero on their fairings, and Norton is betting some superbike buyers would prefer a cleaner look.

Norton sells the Manx R in four trims. The base bike gets manually adjustable Marzocchi suspension, cast aluminum wheels, and room for a passenger, while the Apex adds semi-active Marzocchi suspension and forged wheels. The Signature goes single-seat with carbon fiber bodywork and Rotobox carbon wheels, and the First Edition piles on titanium fixings, a numbered top yoke, and a quilted leather seat. Every version gets Brembo Hypure brakes and an 8-inch TFT touchscreen. UK pricing runs from £20,250 (about $27,600) for the base bike to £38,750 (about $52,800) for the Signature, with the First Edition priced on request. US pricing hasn’t been announced ahead of an expected early 2027 arrival, so American riders have a few months to save up for all that paint. US pricing hasn’t been announced ahead of an expected early 2027 arrival, so American riders have a few months to save up for all that paint.

The post This “Bentley of Bikes” sports 5 layers of paint, and packs a 206Hp engine underneath first appeared on Yanko Design.

Flying Traffic Cone concept transforms into a Drone to auto-assemble itself on roads

Posted on by

The traffic cone is basically a Rorschach test for the internet generation. Construction workers see a long night shift, college kids see dorm decor, and anyone who’s ever downloaded a movie sees VLC. I mostly see something to swerve around. Xinhao Guo saw a robot. Guo led a student team at the Beijing Institute of Technology that developed SkyCone, a drone concept designed to fly to a highway incident, land in position, and fold itself into a traffic cone.

Guo’s teammates were Songyan Pan, Zixu Zhang, and Wanzheng Liu, and their concept won in the Conceptual Industrial Product Design category at the 2026 European Product Design Award. SkyCone is designed to fly as an X-shaped quadcopter, with each of its four triangular arms housing a ducted propeller. After landing, the arms would tilt up and lock together at magnetic tips, forming a four-sided pyramid with the familiar orange and white stripes. The goal is to keep workers out of live lanes. The team cites a figure that 57% of frontline highway personnel consider manual cone placement their most dangerous task.

Designers: Xinhao Guo, Songyan Pan, Zixu Zhang & Wanzheng Liu

A square central hub anchors SkyCone, carrying a downward-facing camera on a gimbal, with an LED strip and a non-slip mat built into its underside. The four arms are what the team calls Triangular Prism Buckets, hollow orange wedges that each surround a ducted propeller. Red magnetic locks with integrated indicator lights cap the arm tips, which meet at the cone’s apex when everything folds shut. Reflective strips trace the arm edges to improve visibility. My favorite detail is graphic: the white cone bands sit on the faces that point outward after folding, so the drone only looks like a cone once it actually is one.

Charles D. Scanlon, a Los Angeles street painter, designed the modern traffic cone to keep cars away from his wet paint, building it from rubber and fabric salvaged from old tires. His patent was granted in November 1943, and Interstate Rubber Products began manufacturing the design in 1947. The cone eventually made it into the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the federal traffic-control manual. Materials and reflective collars have evolved over eight decades, yet the silhouette has barely budged. SkyCone largely keeps that familiar shape while changing how it gets into position, a sensible approach for an object drivers need to recognize quickly.

Placing those cones is still mostly manual work, with crews riding the back of a slow-moving truck or walking beside it and setting cones down a few feet from passing traffic. The US recorded 850 work zone deaths in 2024, an average of more than two a day. In March 2023, a single crash on I-695 outside Baltimore killed six roadway workers. The SkyCone team describes the first few minutes of an emergency or maintenance call as the most critical stretch, when crews are particularly exposed. A fleet of drones that could position cones before anyone steps out of the truck might reduce that initial exposure.

Brisbane-based Arrowes has already built an Automated Cone Truck that drops a cone every five seconds. On Melbourne’s Eastern Freeway, it handled 65,000 cones while cutting worker exposure to live traffic by roughly 500 hours. Caltrans and UC Davis developed a cab-operated cone machine back in the 2000s, and Spain’s Sacyr and GMV set out to prototype a self-driving trailer with an AI-guided robotic arm. Each system relies on a truck or trailer. SkyCone proposes making each cone responsible for its own delivery. Chris Chang’s Apiece showed in 2022 that a cone could be assembled from flat triangles, and SkyCone basically gives those triangles propellers.

The team’s renders place SkyCone at a nighttime highway repair, an incident scene behind an arrow-board truck, a rockfall on a mountain road, a snowed-over highway, and the crumbling edge of an open-pit mine. The mine scenario sold me, since walking a crumbling pit edge to place cones sounds like a genuinely terrible afternoon. SkyCone joins a line of highway concepts that propose sending machines into hazardous places. The Highway Patrol Drone was designed to wait on light towers and fly to crash scenes ahead of responders, while the Median AMB proposed riding the road divider like a monorail to skip traffic. SkyCone’s role would be marking off the scene so responders can work.

The European Product Design Award is a global, open-entry program run by Farmani Group. SkyCone won in its conceptual tier as a student project, so the award recognizes a design proposal rather than proven roadside performance. Guo and his team want the cone to get into position on its own; whether it can do that reliably beside live traffic remains to be demonstrated. My brain will probably keep saying VLC whenever I see a cone, but now it’s going to add “robot” right after.

 

The post Flying Traffic Cone concept transforms into a Drone to auto-assemble itself on roads first appeared on Yanko Design.