Tag Archives: smartwatch

The NASA Artemis 2.0 Smartwatch Runs Python And Lets Kids Code Their Own Wearable

Posted on by

NASA’s Artemis II lifted off from Kennedy Space Center on April 1, 2026, carrying four astronauts on humanity’s first crewed lunar mission in over 50 years. Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Canada’s Jeremy Hansen are currently aboard the Orion spacecraft, preparing for a lunar flyby that will take them farther from Earth than any humans have traveled since Apollo 13. Space exploration feels immediate again in a way it hasn’t in decades, and CircuitMess timed the NASA Artemis Watch 2.0 perfectly into that cultural moment. This is a $129 programmable smartwatch, fully assembled and ready to use out of the box, inspired by the very mission currently making headlines.

The hardware inside includes a dual-core ESP32 microcontroller, a full-color LCD screen, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, a compass, and a temperature sensor. It pairs with iOS and Android devices over Bluetooth for activity tracking and notifications, and the firmware is entirely open-source, reprogrammable in Python, CircuitBlocks, or the Arduino IDE. You can design custom watch faces, build interactive apps, and modify sensor behavior as deep as you want to go. The age recommendation is 9 and up, which reflects the lower barrier to entry compared to CircuitMess’s Perseverance Rover kit we wrote about earlier. No assembly required, no soldering, just charge it and start exploring.

Designer: CircuitMess

Most smartwatches aimed at kids treat programming as something that happens elsewhere, if it happens at all. You get a companion app with preset themes, maybe a handful of watch face options, and locked-down software that assumes the wearer has no interest in understanding what’s running underneath. The Artemis Watch 2.0 flips that entire model. CircuitMess ships it fully functional, but every layer of the software is accessible and modifiable. The visual block-based CircuitBlocks environment gives beginners a starting point, while Python and Arduino IDE support mean users can graduate to full code without hitting an artificial ceiling. The firmware lives on GitHub as an open-source repository, so there’s no proprietary lock-in and no feature wall you can’t get past.

The dual-core ESP32 processor does real work here. It handles Bluetooth pairing with smartphones, processes sensor data from the accelerometer and gyroscope in real time, and runs whatever custom apps you decide to build on top of the base system. The compass and temperature sensor add environmental awareness, which opens up coding projects beyond simple timekeeping. You could program the watch to log temperature changes throughout the day, trigger alerts based on compass heading, or build a step counter that uses the accelerometer to track movement patterns. The 1.77 x 0.5 x 2.76 inch form factor keeps it wearable for younger users, and the rechargeable Li-Po battery charges via USB-C.

CircuitMess sells the Artemis Watch 2.0 standalone at $129, but it also appears in a Mars Exploration Bundle alongside the Perseverance Rover for $399, a 23% discount over buying both separately. That bundle positions the watch as a companion device for tracking rover missions and staying connected during the 20-hour rover build. CircuitMess also offers a Collector’s Bundle that includes the watch and four official strap designs for $149. The company has sold over 300,000 kits worldwide, and the Artemis branding ties directly into the kind of sustained media coverage that makes space feel culturally relevant again.

The Artemis Watch 2.0 is available now at circuitmess.com. If you followed the actual Artemis II launch this week, if you care about wearable tech that doesn’t condescend to younger users, or if you want a smartwatch that teaches coding by letting you rebuild it from the inside out, this is one of the few products in this category worth the $129 ask.

The post The NASA Artemis 2.0 Smartwatch Runs Python And Lets Kids Code Their Own Wearable first appeared on Yanko Design.

This Coin-Sized Sensor Turns Any Analog Watch Into a Fitness Tracker

Posted on by

There is always a persistent tension in the watch world. Smartwatches do a lot, but they rarely look good doing it. Analog watches look exceptional, but they’ll never ping you when you’ve hit 10,000 steps. The Ganance Heir is a small, coin-sized sensor that quietly sits on the caseback of your watch and bridges that gap… no screen, no subscription, no compromise.

Developed by a Chicago-based startup with a focus on intentional technology, the Heir attaches to the caseback of most watches using a micro suction disc. At 30 mm in diameter and just 3 mm thick, it weighs a feather-light 5 grams. You’d barely know it’s there. Swap it between watches in seconds, slot it into the HeirBand for gym days when you’d rather not ruin a leather strap with sweat, and carry on.

Designer: Ganance

The feature set is deliberately restrained. The Heir tracks steps, distance, and calories, pushing that data to the Ganance iPhone app and Apple Health. It vibrates to alert you to incoming calls and texts, and a single or double tap controls media playback. Three levels of vibration strength give you a degree of personalization, and tap input can be disabled entirely through the app. No heart rate sensor, no always-on display, no noise.

An Android app is currently in development, expected around late June alongside the next batch of shipments. At that point, the device will also sync with Google’s Health Connect, opening it up to a wider ecosystem of fitness apps. Future updates already on the roadmap include activity type splitting, sedentary time tracking, adaptive goals, a silent alarm, WhatsApp and Slack vibration alerts, task reminders, and weather-based activity recommendations.

The Heir isn’t without its limitations. Battery life sits at 42 hours, meaning a daily top-up via the proprietary dock is essentially non-negotiable. Early adopter reviews have flagged some inconsistencies with step tracking and connectivity, though Ganance says those issues are actively being addressed.

Ganance isn’t the first to explore this concept — the Chronos and Germany’s Trivoly tried similar approaches without gaining lasting traction. Whether the Heir has the staying power its predecessors lacked remains to be seen. The Heir is available to pre-order at $149, with the HeirBand priced at $39 or bundled together for $169. Shipping is expected this spring across the US, Canada, the UK, and select European countries.

The post This Coin-Sized Sensor Turns Any Analog Watch Into a Fitness Tracker first appeared on Yanko Design.

Futurewave Just Built a Smartwatch That Works Off the Grid

Posted on by

Most smartwatches are sold on the premise of convenience. They track your steps, ping you when you get a text, tell you to breathe, and remind you to stand up every hour like a politely nagging coworker strapped to your wrist. I don’t say that as a knock on the category. Convenience is genuinely valuable. But somewhere along the way, the smartwatch conversation became entirely about optimization and lifestyle metrics, and we kind of forgot that the wrist is also a really good place to put something that could keep you alive.

That’s where O-Boy comes in. Developed by Brussels-based design studio Futurewave, O-Boy is a satellite-connected smartwatch built specifically for emergencies in places where mobile networks simply don’t exist. No bars. No Wi-Fi. No backup signal. We’re talking mountains, open ocean, remote job sites, the kind of geography that doesn’t care about your carrier plan. In those environments, O-Boy functions as a direct link to satellite communication, allowing the wearer to transmit an emergency alert regardless of terrestrial infrastructure.

Designer: Futurewave

The premise sounds straightforward enough, but the execution is what makes this project interesting. Getting satellite communication hardware into a compact, wearable form factor is not a small feat. Futurewave brought together product designers, electronics engineers, and antenna specialists to make it work, and rethought the assembly system entirely from how conventional wearables are manufactured. That kind of cross-disciplinary collaboration tends to produce things that actually push the category forward rather than just iterating on what’s already there.

Visually, O-Boy reads as deliberate and utilitarian without being overtly tactical or rugged-for-rugged’s-sake. It doesn’t look like a watch that belongs exclusively to climbers or military personnel, which I think is actually the right call. The moment you design something to look extreme, you narrow your audience to people who already identify with that world. O-Boy appears to be reaching for a broader user: anyone who spends time in remote environments, whether for work or adventure, and wants a layer of safety that their phone simply cannot provide.

I’ll be honest about something. I’ve never been fully convinced that the average smartwatch user needs another notification device. The market is crowded, the differentiation is thin, and most new entries end up competing on specs that only matter to enthusiasts. O-Boy sidesteps that conversation almost entirely. It’s not trying to be the smartest watch. It’s trying to be the one you’d actually want on your wrist when a situation becomes life-or-death. That’s a completely different design brief, and it produces a completely different kind of product.

What I appreciate most is that the project seems to understand its context. Conventional mobile networks cover only a fraction of the Earth’s surface. Vast swaths of ocean, mountain ranges, deserts, and rural work sites exist in a communication dead zone that we collectively don’t think about until something goes wrong. The Apple Watch’s satellite SOS feature hinted at this need, but that capability is baked into a device designed primarily for a very different kind of user, sold at a premium price point and wrapped in a broader ecosystem. O-Boy is positioning itself as something more focused, more purpose-built, and arguably more honest about what it’s actually for.

Does it solve every problem in the wearable safety space? Almost certainly not. Satellite communication latency, subscription models for satellite access, and battery constraints are all real questions that any device in this category has to reckon with. Futurewave hasn’t published exhaustive technical specs publicly, so some of those answers remain open. But as a design concept and a signal of where wearables could be heading, it’s genuinely compelling.

The best design doesn’t ask you to change your habits. It meets you exactly where you are, anticipates the moment things go wrong, and gives you a way through. O-Boy feels like it was built with that thinking at its core. Whether it reaches mass production or stays within niche markets, the conversation it’s starting is one worth having.

The post Futurewave Just Built a Smartwatch That Works Off the Grid first appeared on Yanko Design.

This Concept Smartwatch Detaches Into an AR Monocular, and It Solves a Problem Meta Can’t

Posted on by

Sailors used to carry pocket telescopes. Birdwatchers still carry monoculars. Geologists carry hand lenses. What these instruments share, beyond the obvious optical function, is a deliberate relationship to information: you raise the tool when you choose to engage with it, and the world stays unmediated the rest of the time. That’s actually a pretty sophisticated UX philosophy, and it’s one the entire wearable tech industry has quietly abandoned in favor of always-on overlays, persistent notifications, and the assumption that more access to information is axiomatically better. Yuxuan Hua’s Lens concept is a Silver A’ Design Award winner that makes the counterargument in hardware form.

The concept is a detachable AR smartwatch that splits into two objects: a wrist-worn puck for everyday use and a handheld monocular for AR-enhanced outdoor exploration. The back face of the module houses a dual-lens optical array, a wide camera and LiDAR sensor tucked into a vertical pill recess, while the face doubles as a circular display that overlays navigation prompts, species identification, and star charts over a live feed when held up like a field scope. The band itself is Alpine-loop textile, the lug system simple enough to suggest the module can swap across band styles, and the whole thing comes in at 48mm wide and 68g. The rendering detail is strong: the detached module has the cold, machined look of a quality compass or a classic light meter, the kind of object that rewards handling.

Designer: Yuxuan Hua

Hua interviewed hikers, foragers, and stargazers and found three consistent frustrations: devices were too bulky and fragile for rugged environments, and frequent screen interactions broke the rhythm of being outside. The phone-as-field-guide pattern, pull it out, unlock, navigate to the app, wait for it to load, try to hold it steady while pointing at something, is a sequence of six interruptions where you actually wanted zero. Smart glasses solve the unlock problem but introduce the far more annoying problem of a permanent digital scrim between you and whatever you came outdoors to look at. The monocular is the thing you raise when you want to know something and lower when you don’t, which is precisely how attention works when you’re actually engaged with a landscape.

Most AR concept hardware reaches for science fiction: translucent surfaces, glowing elements, the visual grammar of a prop department. Lens reaches instead for the instrument drawer: the detached module has the proportions and material honesty of a quality compass housing or a Leica light meter, machined aluminum with visible fasteners and a lens array that looks like it belongs in an optician’s toolkit. It doesn’t look like the future. It looks like a very well-made tool, which is a significantly harder design target to hit.

Hua began developing Lens in 2021, during the pandemic, which is useful context. Lockdown-era design projects often reveal what designers actually miss about the physical world when it’s taken away, and what Lens mourns, obliquely, is uninterrupted attention. The whole concept is an argument that the best AR device for outdoor use is one that disappears when you’re not using it, one that earns its presence by staying out of the way until the moment it’s needed, then delivers exactly what the moment requires. Whether the engineering can catch up to that vision, packing AR projection, LiDAR, and a wide-FOV camera into a 68g coin of aluminum, is another question entirely. As a design proposition, it’s already done its job.

The post This Concept Smartwatch Detaches Into an AR Monocular, and It Solves a Problem Meta Can’t first appeared on Yanko Design.

Meta Wants to Put an AI Health Tracker on Your Wrist in 2026. What Could Go Wrong??

Posted on by

Meta is building a smartwatch, and it wants to know your heart rate, your sleep patterns, your activity levels, and whatever else it can pull from a sensor pressed against your skin all day. The device is codenamed Malibu 2, it’s targeting a 2026 launch, and by most accounts it sounds like a perfectly competent health wearable. The problem isn’t the hardware. The problem is the company attached to it.

This is the same Meta that just faced congressional scrutiny over social media addiction today. The same Meta whose smart glasses are reportedly inching toward facial recognition. The same Meta that filed a patent for Project Lazarus, a system designed to generate posthumous content from deceased users, because apparently your data doesn’t stop being useful to them just because you do. Handing your most intimate biometric information to that company is a case study in one.

Designer: Meta

To be fair, the product itself has a coherent logic behind it. Meta’s Ray-Ban Display glasses have been received surprisingly well by the press, and the neural wristband that ships with them, which uses electromyography to read muscle signals and translate them into gestures, only works with those glasses. That’s a real limitation. A smartwatch that absorbs that gesture-control functionality while adding health tracking and a persistent AI assistant would close a gap that currently makes the whole setup feel incomplete. From a pure product strategy standpoint, Malibu 2 makes sense.

The hardware ambitions have also matured since Meta’s first attempt at a smartwatch, which was scrapped in 2022 after accumulating plans for detachable cameras and metaverse tie-ins that never quite added up to a coherent device. Malibu 2 is reportedly focused on health tracking and Meta AI integration, which is a much cleaner pitch. The company already has a working partnership with Garmin, visible in the Oakley Vanguard sports glasses and a neural band demo at CES 2026 inside a Garmin-powered car concept. If there’s a natural manufacturing and platform partner for this watch, Garmin is the obvious candidate.

Meta is also reportedly developing the watch to sit alongside updated Ray-Ban Display glasses, internally called Hypernova 2, with both devices likely to be unveiled at Meta Connect in September. The Phoenix mixed reality glasses, meanwhile, have been pushed to 2027 partly because Meta’s executives were concerned about releasing too many devices at once and confusing consumers. That’s a reasonable concern. It’s also a little rich coming from a company whose current product lineup already includes smart glasses with a separate neural band that only controls one device.

The wearables market is genuinely ready for a credible third competitor alongside Apple and Samsung, and Meta has the AI infrastructure and the existing glasses ecosystem to make Malibu 2 compelling from launch. But compelling and trustworthy are different things, and Meta has spent twenty years demonstrating which one it prioritizes. Your Apple Watch data sits in Apple’s ecosystem, behind a company that has made privacy a marketing pillar and a legal battleground. Your Malibu 2 data sits with a company that patented a way to keep monetizing you after you die.

The post Meta Wants to Put an AI Health Tracker on Your Wrist in 2026. What Could Go Wrong?? first appeared on Yanko Design.

Meta Wants to Put an AI Health Tracker on Your Wrist in 2026. What Could Go Wrong??

Posted on by

Meta is building a smartwatch, and it wants to know your heart rate, your sleep patterns, your activity levels, and whatever else it can pull from a sensor pressed against your skin all day. The device is codenamed Malibu 2, it’s targeting a 2026 launch, and by most accounts it sounds like a perfectly competent health wearable. The problem isn’t the hardware. The problem is the company attached to it.

This is the same Meta that just faced congressional scrutiny over social media addiction today. The same Meta whose smart glasses are reportedly inching toward facial recognition. The same Meta that filed a patent for Project Lazarus, a system designed to generate posthumous content from deceased users, because apparently your data doesn’t stop being useful to them just because you do. Handing your most intimate biometric information to that company is a case study in one.

Designer: Meta

To be fair, the product itself has a coherent logic behind it. Meta’s Ray-Ban Display glasses have been received surprisingly well by the press, and the neural wristband that ships with them, which uses electromyography to read muscle signals and translate them into gestures, only works with those glasses. That’s a real limitation. A smartwatch that absorbs that gesture-control functionality while adding health tracking and a persistent AI assistant would close a gap that currently makes the whole setup feel incomplete. From a pure product strategy standpoint, Malibu 2 makes sense.

The hardware ambitions have also matured since Meta’s first attempt at a smartwatch, which was scrapped in 2022 after accumulating plans for detachable cameras and metaverse tie-ins that never quite added up to a coherent device. Malibu 2 is reportedly focused on health tracking and Meta AI integration, which is a much cleaner pitch. The company already has a working partnership with Garmin, visible in the Oakley Vanguard sports glasses and a neural band demo at CES 2026 inside a Garmin-powered car concept. If there’s a natural manufacturing and platform partner for this watch, Garmin is the obvious candidate.

Meta is also reportedly developing the watch to sit alongside updated Ray-Ban Display glasses, internally called Hypernova 2, with both devices likely to be unveiled at Meta Connect in September. The Phoenix mixed reality glasses, meanwhile, have been pushed to 2027 partly because Meta’s executives were concerned about releasing too many devices at once and confusing consumers. That’s a reasonable concern. It’s also a little rich coming from a company whose current product lineup already includes smart glasses with a separate neural band that only controls one device.

The wearables market is genuinely ready for a credible third competitor alongside Apple and Samsung, and Meta has the AI infrastructure and the existing glasses ecosystem to make Malibu 2 compelling from launch. But compelling and trustworthy are different things, and Meta has spent twenty years demonstrating which one it prioritizes. Your Apple Watch data sits in Apple’s ecosystem, behind a company that has made privacy a marketing pillar and a legal battleground. Your Malibu 2 data sits with a company that patented a way to keep monetizing you after you die.

The post Meta Wants to Put an AI Health Tracker on Your Wrist in 2026. What Could Go Wrong?? first appeared on Yanko Design.

This $50 Smart Ring Has a Screen (And Works Like A Tiny Smartwatch)

Posted on by

The smartwatch got smaller. Then the smart ring arrived. Now Rogbid has released something that splits the difference and costs less than a nice dinner: the Fusion, a hybrid device that looks like someone shrunk a fitness tracker and stuck it on a ring band. For fifty dollars, you get a legitimate OLED display, actual health sensors, and the ability to wear your technology on whichever body part feels right that day.

This is more than just miniaturization for the sake of novelty. The Fusion measures 20.6 x 21 x 8.2mm and weighs about as much as three quarters stacked together, yet it monitors heart rate, tracks sleep, measures blood oxygen levels, and survives underwater thanks to 5ATM water resistance. Rogbid includes both a finger-sized adjustable strap and a wrist band, turning the device into whatever you need depending on your outfit, activity, or tolerance for questions from strangers. Battery life hits five days with regular use, which means this tiny screen actually pulls its weight between charges.

Designer: Rogbid

You have to give Rogbid credit for seeing Casio’s G-Shock ring sell out and thinking, “we can do that, but with actual tech inside.” That Casio piece was pure nostalgia, a fun gimmick that proved a market existed for finger-watches. Rogbid’s move feels like the logical, if slightly unhinged, next step: taking the novelty and injecting actual utility.

We’re talking over 100 sports modes, which is a software problem I don’t even want to think about navigating on a half-inch screen. But the hardware is there: an optical heart rate sensor, blood oxygen monitoring, and all the usual motion tracking. They even added prayer time reminders and a “couple interaction mode” for sharing codes, which feels like they just kept adding features from a hat until they ran out of room. It’s the kind of feature creep that’s almost admirable in its audacity, especially when most competitors are still trying to get basic step counting right in the ring form factor.

This whole thing is a fascinating gamble on what people want from a smart ring. The entire appeal of the Oura and its competitors is their subtlety; they disappear into your daily life. The Fusion, however, plants a glowing OLED screen right on your knuckle and demands attention. It’s a complete rejection of the minimalist aesthetic that defined the category. Maybe that’s the point. For fifty bucks, Rogbid isn’t trying to compete with the thousand-dollar jewelry pieces. They’re creating an entirely new, wonderfully weird sub-category of wearable that’s too cheap and too interesting to ignore.

The post This $50 Smart Ring Has a Screen (And Works Like A Tiny Smartwatch) first appeared on Yanko Design.

Wear Your Real Watch: This Case Turns Apple Watch into a Mini Handheld

Posted on by

Full smartphones often feel like overkill, but the Apple Watch on your wrist is still awkward for anything beyond quick glances. There’s also the complication of wanting to wear a mechanical or analog watch without giving up notifications, Apple Pay, and quick replies. Stacking both on one arm feels ridiculous, and choosing between connectivity and wearing the watch you actually like is the kind of small annoyance that lingers.

elrow’s miniphone Standard and miniphone Ultra are 3D-printed cases that turn an Apple Watch into a narrow, palm-sized device with a lanyard. The Standard fits the 46mm Series 10 and 11, while the Ultra fits the Apple Watch Ultra 1, 2, and 3. Both are about 95mm tall, with textured translucent bodies, visible screws, and an open back so you can charge without disassembling the case.

Designer: elrow industries

Leaving your iPhone in a bag and carrying the miniphone instead means you still get calls, messages, and Apple Pay, but you are not staring at a six-inch screen every time a notification pings. Holding the watch in a slightly larger body makes tapping icons feel more like using an old iPod than pecking at your wrist, and clipping it to a pocket means it stays out of sight until you need it.

The translucent PLA+ on the Standard and PETG on the Ultra, textured surfaces, and stainless or black-coated steel hardware give the cases a rugged, workshop vibe. The integrated lanyard hole and included paracord with an orange bead make it easy to carry without pockets. It feels more like a small tool than a fashion case, which suits the “tool ↔ watch” idea of keeping your mechanical watch on.

Moving the watch off your wrist means that continuous heart rate, ECG, blood oxygen, and sleep tracking are basically gone. You are also told to turn off wrist detection for better battery and notifications, which changes how Apple Pay, auto-lock, and some security features behave. Activity rings and step counts become unreliable when the watch lives in a pocket or on a lanyard, and fall detection may not work as intended.

WatchOS assumes a wrist, from raise-to-wake gestures to how workouts and reminders work. In a miniphone case, some of that feels off or becomes less useful. You are treating the Apple Watch as a tiny connected widget for notifications and quick controls, not as a health tracker logging your life, which is fine if that is what you wanted in the first place.

The miniphone cases make the most sense if you already use the Apple Watch as a lightweight communicator and remote, not as a medical device. If you love wearing a mechanical watch while still having a pocketable slice of watchOS nearby, or you want less phone without going fully offline, a 3D-printed case that trades sensors for simplicity is a strangely logical, if niche, step.

The post Wear Your Real Watch: This Case Turns Apple Watch into a Mini Handheld first appeared on Yanko Design.

Pebble Round 2 Fixes the Bezel and Battery After an 11-Year Wait

Posted on by

The 2015 Pebble Time Round stole a lot of hearts by looking like a real analog watch and still being a Pebble, but it shipped with a tiny screen, a huge bezel, and battery life that lagged behind its siblings. It remained the thinnest smartwatch ever made, yet always felt like a beautiful compromise waiting for a second chance, the kind of product people kept wearing despite its flaws because it looked better than anything else on their wrist.

Pebble Round 2 is that second chance, part of the broader Pebble relaunch. It keeps the same ultra-slim stainless-steel profile, just 8.1 mm thick, but fixes the two big complaints: the bezel is gone, and the battery now lasts around two weeks. It is framed as the most stylish Pebble ever, but this time without the asterisk or the mental math about whether style was worth the compromises.

Designer: Pebble

The new 1.3-inch color e-paper display covers the entire face, 260 × 260 pixels at 283 DPI, twice the resolution of the original. The always-on, reflective screen still behaves like a classic Pebble, readable in sunlight and gentle indoors, but finally looks proportionally right. Wrap that in a stainless-steel frame, and you get something that reads as a watch first, gadget second, which has always been the goal.

The two-week estimated battery life, made possible by newer Bluetooth chips and Pebble’s frugal OS, brings the Round in line with the rest of the lineup. Interaction stays very Pebble, four physical buttons you can use without looking, plus a touchscreen you do not have to rely on. There is a backlight for night glances, but the default state is that calm, always-on face that does not glow at you during meetings.

The software side stays fun, quirky, and open source. PebbleOS powers everything, with an open-source mobile app that works with iOS and Android. The Pebble app store has over 15,000 apps and watchfaces, and the SDK is there if you want to build your own. Health tracking covers steps and sleep, enough for everyday awareness without pretending to be a hardcore fitness or sports watch.

Dual microphones handle speech input, from interacting with AI agents to replying to messages on Android, with iOS support coming in some regions. Water resistance is targeted at 30 m, enough for daily life. Style-wise, you get matte black with a 20 mm band, brushed silver in 14 mm or 20 mm, and polished rose gold in 14 mm, all with quick-release bands and room for standard straps.

Pebble Round 2 speaks to people who miss glancing at a watch that is always on, who like the idea of weeks-long battery life and tactile buttons, and who want something that looks good with a shirt cuff as well as a hoodie. It is not chasing the latest sensor arms race; it is doubling down on the idea that a smartwatch can still feel like a watch, just one that happens to run PebbleOS in 2026, with a full-face display and enough battery to forget about charging for 14 days.

The post Pebble Round 2 Fixes the Bezel and Battery After an 11-Year Wait first appeared on Yanko Design.