Author Archives: Sarang Sheth

Unofficial Audi A8 Concept Keeps Classic Sedan Proportions and a Traditional Grille

Posted on by

The Audi A8 died in early 2026, quietly, the way flagships die now. Order books shut in Germany, production wound down, and the Q9 SUV inherited the crown after the A8 managed 1,406 US sales in a year the Q8 did 10,881. Audi swears a fifth generation arrives around 2030. Luca Serafini apparently decided four years is a long time to sit around, so he built one himself. His version borrows the Concept C’s monolithic surfacing and four-element light signature, then quietly refuses the vertical Singleframe, running a full-width horizontal bar with the four rings lit at center instead, plus twin exhausts in the diffuser.

Everything else on the car is doing less on purpose. Six-spoke wheels with cross-drilled discs behind them, blacked-out pillars, flush glass, a shoulder line so soft you have to hunt for it, and a titanium-silver finish borrowed straight from Concept C’s anodized aluminum look. Those illuminated rings front and rear go dark the second any regulator sees them, and the front overhang is shorter than crash structure would ever allow. Neither problem makes the renders less convincing. They just mark exactly where a designer stopped negotiating with reality.

Designer: Luca Serafini, LS Design

The vertical Singleframe remains the most argued-about thing Audi has done in a decade, and Serafini declines it outright. Massimo Frascella built that upright slab for the Concept C by reaching back to the 1936 Auto Union Type C and the 2004 A6, and when we spent forty minutes with the car in Munich it absolutely worked at roadster scale. Stretch the same face across five-plus meters of limousine, though, and authority starts sliding toward novelty toothpaste tube. What replaces it is a wide horizontal aperture with the rings glowing dead center, flanked by the four-element light graphic Audi now uses front and rear. Autoevolution called the result tame. I’d call it a designer knowing what a big car’s face has to do.

Audi built the slipperiest sedan on the planet in 1982 by bonding the side glass flush with the bodywork, hitting a drag coefficient of 0.30 and calling itself the aerodynamics world champion. Forty-four years later the same instinct gets rebranded as radical simplicity. Serafini’s A8 runs the C3 playbook almost literally, with flush glazing, no visible door handles, blacked-out pillars, and a body carrying zero character lines. The whole surface works on volume and reflection alone, which is the hardest thing to pull off in car design and the easiest to botch. Broad rear haunches and a near-vertical Kamm tail keep it from reading as a bar of soap.

Twin oval outlets sit in the black rear diffuser, which rules out any A8 e-tron reading immediately. That looks prophetic rather than backward-facing, given Audi scrapped its 2033 combustion cutoff and then dropped the 987-hp Nuvolari, a 4.0-liter twin-turbo V8 with three axial-flux motors and a 10,000 rpm redline, in the exact year it once promised to go electric-only. A green vertical accent in the lower intake muddles the story slightly, since it reads like a charge-status indicator on a car with tailpipes. Serafini has been running Concept C surfacing across an imaginary Audi lineup since last September, covering an SUV, a hot hatch, an A2 revival and an R8 Spyder. This flagship is his second run at the A8.

Frascella’s rule now is that Audi shows nothing it cannot build, which makes independent work like this the only place ambition still runs unsupervised. Serafini works in Blender, 3DS Max and Unreal with AI in the pipeline, so the images are staged rather than surfaced from production CAD, and a few details fall apart under close reading. His Ferrari single seater from yesterday had the same quality, gorgeous and structurally impossible in roughly equal measure. What this A8 proves is that the segment’s problem was never the shape. Audi walked away from the sedan because buyers did, and a car this composed makes that math feel like a shame.

The post Unofficial Audi A8 Concept Keeps Classic Sedan Proportions and a Traditional Grille first appeared on Yanko Design.

Miele’s G8 Dishwasher Photographs Your Dirty Dishes Before Auto-Selecting The Cycle: Hands-on at IFA 2026

Posted on by

Miele’s new G8 Diamond snaps a photo of your dirty dishes before it washes them. The moment the door swings toward shut, a light inside blinks on, a camera grabs one frame, the light dies, and the AutoVision system studies what it caught. If it sees a bottle, it calls up BottleClean and drives the spray harder. If it sees a pot, the cleaning intensity climbs. If it sees plastics, it runs the new hot air drying harder, because plastic containers are famously terrible at drying themselves. Miele showed it for the first time at IFA 2026 in Berlin, and it lands in Germany, Austria and Switzerland in April 2027.

A camera in a dishwasher makes the headline, but the memory is what makes the design. The G8 holds onto that bottle it clocked at breakfast, so stacking dinner plates on top of it by eight in the evening changes nothing. Layer in AutoDos and its PowerDisk granulate, measuring out its own detergent since 2018, then set an app rule that says wait until 80 percent full and never before 10pm, and the machine stops consulting you altogether. Miele has spent decades selling dishwashers on the promise that they scrub so you do not have to. This one wants to think so you do not have to.

Designer: Miele

Here’s the part that actually impressed me. AutoVision doesn’t run a video feed you can scrub through in the app. It fires once, right as the door clicks shut, and the machine works from that single image for the entire cycle. Load a wine bottle at breakfast, stack it under a mountain of lunch plates by evening, and the G8 still treats it as a bottle, because it saw it once and that was enough. The only real caveat came from Miele’s own team at IFA: keep bottles roughly central and pots in the lower basket, since the spray arm still struggles to reach the far corners. Vision only helps if the water can follow it there.

What makes this genuinely new isn’t the word AI, which every appliance brand at IFA 2026 was throwing around like confetti. Most of those claims are turbidity sensors, the kind that read how murky the wash water has become and adjust accordingly. LG’s SenseClean works that way, and Samsung has filed similarly around soil detection. A turbidity sensor knows the water is dirty. It has no idea why. Miele’s camera identifies the actual object sitting in the rack, a considerably harder computer vision problem, and one that both LG and Bosch have patented around for years without shipping a consumer dishwasher built on it. Miele is putting an object-recognition camera inside a box you can buy next spring, not just inside a patent filing.

Around that camera sits a decade of quieter automation finally clicking into place. AutoDos, with its PowerDisk granulate, has been dosing detergent on its own since 2018, and Miele still claims nobody else in the category offers true automatic dispensing. ExcellentDry adds a hot air system with three fixed levels, chosen once and then applied forever, aimed squarely at the plastic containers that usually come out of a cycle still damp at the base. The cutlery drawer becomes a genuine third tier, one side droppable for coffee cups, and a new touch display replaces the old dial logic. Set the app to run only past 10pm and only above 80 percent full, or tie it to your solar output, and the dishwasher stops asking permission for anything.

None of this works if you don’t trust the camera’s judgment, and Miele knows it. “Intelligence can be programmed. Trust has to be earned,” said Dr. Axel Kniehl, the company’s Executive Director of Marketing and Sales, at the IFA press conference, and it’s the one line from the whole reveal that actually admits the stakes. AutoVision only functions if enabled by the user, according to Miele’s own release, which suggests it ships switched off by default. Fair enough. Handing a machine the authority to decide how hard to scrub your grandmother’s pans is a bigger ask than letting it dose its own detergent, and Miele seems to know it needs to earn that permission slowly rather than assume it.

The G8 Diamond won’t reach a single kitchen before April 2027, and even then only in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, so everything here is still a promise rather than a lived-in product. But the promise is the interesting part. For a century, appliance makers competed on how much physical labor they could remove. Miele is the first one at this scale betting the next fight is over who you trust to make the fifty tiny decisions labor never touched in the first place.

The post Miele’s G8 Dishwasher Photographs Your Dirty Dishes Before Auto-Selecting The Cycle: Hands-on at IFA 2026 first appeared on Yanko Design.

Kellogg’s Hired a Designer to Make Your Cereal’s Crackling Louder — and It’s Gloriously Weird

Posted on by

Whether you’re a milk-before-cereal guy or a cereal-before-milk guy (the only correct process btw), there’s an undeniable component about the cereal-eating experience that almost everyone takes for granted. That slight crackle and pop sound as the cereal’s air-pockets burst to get filled with milk. It’s a pretty simple yet fundamental auditory feedback that your cereal-eating experience would feel incomplete without. Seriously, imagine pouring milk into your cereal and dead silence, I guarantee you, it wouldn’t feel good.

That snap/crackle is such a core part of the cereal eating journey that Dominic Wilcox designed a bowl that amplifies the sound. If it sounds weird in theory, it absolutely is, and Wilcox isn’t one to shy away from weird inventions (including headphones that swap your left and right ears with each other so everything sounds strange). The aptly named “Snap, Crackle, and Pop amplification cereal bowl” is one such invention that leans into Wilcox’s need to chase the absurd. Designed to look like a gramophone, this bowl puts a microphone to your cereal, enhancing the musical journey you embark on every breakfast.

Designer: Dominic Wilcox

The cereal bowl was commissioned by Kellogg’s as a part of their challenge to make breakfast more interesting. While most people would simply put puzzles on a cereal box to keep kids occupied, this weird contraption tickles their fancy by leaning into the kind of chaos children tend to love. The bowl comes with a horn on top, and a knob on the rim. Load your cereal, add the milk, flip the on switch, and a microphone captures the audio, playing it through the speaker unit built into the horn. The volume knob lets you dial up or down the noise… and I can only assume there’s a battery somewhere in the base that needs charging every few days.

Needless to say, the Snap, Crackle and Pop amplification cereal bowl works with all types of cereal (as well as all types of milk). Just go about your breakfast the way you normally would, and listen to the gentle white noise of your cereal turning soggy. If you want to be even more unhinged, swap the milk out with soda and you’ll hear fizzing sounds too. Your dentist will hate me, but do it for the plot!

The post Kellogg’s Hired a Designer to Make Your Cereal’s Crackling Louder — and It’s Gloriously Weird first appeared on Yanko Design.

We just reinvented Phablets: Huawei’s Wide-body Pura X View feels oddly nostalgic to the touch

Posted on by

Seventy percent of Samsung’s record 1.44 million Galaxy Z8 series pre-orders went to the wide 4:3 model over the traditional tall one, a number that makes product planners cancel their afternoon meetings. Huawei saw it coming. The Pura X View, launched in China on August 20, is a slab phone with a 16:9.5 screen, no hinge, 6.68mm of thickness, and a 7,000mAh battery packed into 201 grams. Run the panel geometry and the body lands near 144 by 86mm, which is essentially the 2011 Galaxy Note’s 146.9 by 83mm with fifteen years of thinning applied on top. The first phablet just came back, and it skipped the hinge entirely.

Huawei shipped its first 16:10 phone in March 2025, roughly seventeen months before Samsung’s wide Fold 8 and eighteen before Apple’s expected iPhone Ultra. That head start counts for plenty editorially and almost nothing commercially, because the Pura X View runs HarmonyOS 7 without Google services and has no confirmed launch outside China. The width also brings a problem nobody involved has solved yet. Fold 8 reviewers keep flagging that one-handed typing on a wide cover screen demands a thumb stretch most people just do not have. Huawei is asking you to live inside that stretch full time, with no fold to escape into.

Designer: Huawei

I keep coming back to the battery number because it should not work the way it does. Cramming 7,000mAh into a 6.68mm body usually means a phone that feels like a coaster, but Huawei leaned on the extra width instead of stacking cells vertically, and the reported silicon-carbon anode chemistry lets the pack sit flatter than lithium-ion ever could. The screen-to-body math backs it up too, a claimed 96.1 percent with bezels measured at a uniform 1.05mm on all four sides, which is tighter framing than most flagships bother chasing. Around back, Huawei kept the pill-shaped camera bar and striped texture from the Pura X Max, so this reads as a family member rather than a one-off experiment.

The historical parallel only gets stranger the closer you look at it. Samsung built the Galaxy Note on a 16:10 panel in 2011 specifically because it read and wrote better than 16:9, and that logic held until the LG G6 and Galaxy S8 dragged the entire industry toward 18:9 in 2017. At the start of that year, over 95 percent of phones sold still ran 16:9. Within about eighteen months it had nearly vanished, replaced by taller and taller screens that eventually made “phablet” sound like a word from a dead language. At 1.68:1, the Pura X View is actually squatter than any of those old 16:9 phones, closer in spirit to the doomed Dell Streak than to the Note it resembles in the hand.

None of this makes the Pura X View an easy recommendation, and I would rather say that upfront than let the nostalgia do all the talking. Pricing remains unconfirmed, early Chinese estimates swing wildly between 4,499 and 7,500 yuan, and Huawei has a recent history of catching real backlash over Pura pricing. There is also no path to a Google-services version, which locks most of the world out regardless of cost. What the Pura X View does prove is that the tall screen was never physics, just a decade of consensus that Samsung and Apple are now both quietly abandoning. We covered the Pura X Max when it doubled down on this same wide logic inside a folding body, and the View feels like Huawei betting the shape works even better without the crease.

The post We just reinvented Phablets: Huawei’s Wide-body Pura X View feels oddly nostalgic to the touch first appeared on Yanko Design.

Dyson’s $499 Camera Toothbrush Is So Advanced, They Had To Redesign The Toothpaste For It

Posted on by

Dyson’s new $499 CameraJet hides a 1mm camera under the brush head, reading 28 images a second, and within 100 milliseconds of spotting a gap between your teeth it fires a cone of mouthrinse straight into it. That single lens is why Dyson also had to formulate its own non-foaming toothpaste, because bubbles blind a camera. It is also why the 12.5ml tank runs a diaphragm pump and pressure chamber, so the jet still fires when you tilt the handle sideways to reach your back molars. One optical decision rewrote the rest of the product. That cascade is the actual story here, and it is a lovely bit of design logic.

James Dyson unveiled it in Paris this morning, capping six years of work, 661 engineers and 38 patents. The vision system is called Gap Optical Targeting, trained on 470,000 dental images and running 16 million lines of code, all so a toothbrush can find the spaces nine in ten of us never floss. It ships today at $499, or £419.99 in the UK, in Ceramic Ultra Blue and Ceramic Pink. You also get a dock that refills the tank in three seconds and RFID brush heads that count their own cleans. Every one of those parts exists because somebody decided the brush should be able to see.

Designer: Dyson

The jet took years of refinement on its own, because the shape of the water matters as much as the camera aiming it. Traditional water flossers use what Dyson calls a needle jet, a narrow, piercing stream that punches through a plaque deposit without actually lifting it away. Dyson’s engineers went hunting for a shape that would sweep plaque off the tooth instead of tunneling through it, and landed on a broad conical spray fired at lower pressure. To test that idea without running a clinical trial every time they tweaked the nozzle, Dyson spent five years building its own synthetic plaque with the National University of Singapore’s Faculty of Dentistry. That is the unglamorous groundwork that never makes the keynote slide but decides whether the whole idea holds up.

None of that fluid engineering matters if the tank runs dry the moment you tilt your head back, which is the next problem the camera created. Conventional reservoirs use a straw-in-a-cup setup that draws air and loses pressure on an angle, fine for a kitchen gadget, useless inside a mouth that never sits still. Dyson’s fix is the anti-gravity tank, built around a pump that adjusts as you move so the jet fires whether the brush is upright, angled, or flat against a back molar. The brush head carries its own logic too, firmer bristles inside for stains, softer ones outside for the gumline, contoured to actually hug a tooth rather than sit flat against it. Even the sonic oscillation varies its angle mid-stroke so bristles do not stall in the tighter corners.

The camera does double duty as a diagnostic tool, streaming live through the MyDyson app so the brush briefly becomes a tiny endoscope. Dyson says nothing is recorded or stored, on the device or in the cloud, and a light on the handle shows when the lens is active. Cameras inside toothbrushes are not new. A Chicago dentist named Craig Kohler built one back in 2016 called the Prophix, a video-streaming brush that let people watch their own mouths on an iPhone in real time. It never went mainstream, and its own website still reads coming soon, a decade on. What Dyson brings that Prophix never had is the industrial muscle to turn that footage into an automated response, steering a jet instead of just showing a picture.

Dyson CameraJet in situ imagery, JPEG, PSD

Dyson has spent decades arguing that the dirt you cannot see is the dirt worth engineering around, first in carpets, then in bathroom air, now in the gap between your incisors. The CameraJet is that philosophy at its smallest scale yet, a lens standing in for the clear bin that made a bagless vacuum’s dust visible for the first time. What makes it worth writing about as design, rather than just as gadgetry, is how completely one sensor reorganized everything around it, the chemistry of the paste, the physics of the pump, the shape of the bristle. That is a rare thing to see fully worked through in an object that costs less than a laptop. Whether $499 buys cleaner teeth is a question for your dentist in six months. Whether it buys a masterclass in constraint driven design is not really a question at all.

The post Dyson’s $499 Camera Toothbrush Is So Advanced, They Had To Redesign The Toothpaste For It first appeared on Yanko Design.

xTool O1 Omni UV Printer Prints on Wood, Metal, Glass, and Your T-Shirts, All From One Desktop Machine

Posted on by

When a desktop printer moves 6,000 units and clears $20 million in revenue on day one, something is clearly going on beyond the usual pre-launch hype cycle. The xTool O1 Omni Printer is a 4-in-1 desktop system merging UV, DTG, DTF, and UV DTF printing in one modular machine, a combination that previously required four separate devices and considerable floor space. For years, creators have been burdened by fragmented workflows, forced to buy separate, single-purpose machines for rigid substrates and textiles. Desktop UV printing has been one of the more notable maker-market stories of 2026, and the O1 is making a clear bid for category leadership. The central design proposition is capability consolidation, and day-one sales suggest it landed with the right people.

Units have already begun shipping, turning pre-order momentum into machines arriving at actual studios and workshops. On August 27, the first offline debut of the O1 Embroidery happened at the Next Level Conference x xTool SMB Summit, where live demos will give attendees their first hands-on encounter with the platform’s textile and dimensional output. That event was a deliberate venue choice: the Summit brings together the small business creative community the O1 is built for, and debuting the embroidery capability there sends a clear signal about where xTool sees the product’s core application. Three editions run from $1,899 for the Single UV configuration to $2,999 for the full UV + Fabric hybrid. The modular dual-printhead system is the engineering decision that holds the entire consolidation promise together.

Designer: XTOOL

Click Here to Buy Now: $1899 $2499 ($600 off). Hurry, deal ends in 48-hours!

The dual-printhead architecture is what separates the O1 from every desktop printer in its class, operating more like a configurable platform than a fixed device. Users can run dual UV printheads for layered effects and accelerated throughput, or swap in a fabric printhead to shift between hard goods and garment workflows on the same machine. UV output covers wood, acrylic, glass, and metal with raised 3D texture effects up to 7mm deep, supported by a 2,000-plus texture library. The fabric side handles DTG and DTF workflows, including on curved and irregular surfaces, with an OEKO-TEX certified system that survives 50-plus washes without fading. A Rotary Attachment extends the platform to cylindrical objects like tumblers, with Automated 3D Modeling covering 90% of mainstream shapes for a 1:1 design preview before printing.

Positioning accuracy is delivered by xTool’s Pixel-Scan Vision System, combining Line Laser Altimetry and CIS Scanning. A Laser-Guided Auto-Focus detects each object’s highest point before printing, eliminating printhead collisions on uneven surfaces. Unlike traditional distorted fish-eye cameras, the 1:1 Distortion-Free CIS Scanning offers close-range, high-definition scans with zero dead zones, powering a jigless “Drop & Print” workflow that removes alignment jigs from the equation, which is a more meaningful time-saver than it sounds in an actual production environment. xTool Studio’s AI Contour Recognition instantly identifies irregular shapes to fill designs perfectly while automatically avoiding holes like camera cutouts. The Laser + UV Seamless Workflow lets users laser-cut a workpiece and move it to the O1, where the software automatically recognizes and aligns the print with zero manual recalibration.

Three editions cover the full range from single-mode UV to full hybrid, priced between $1,899 and $2,999, with each tier differentiated by workflow rather than arbitrary specs. The entry-level UV Edition at $1,899 targets rigid material personalization across wood, acrylic, glass, and metal. The Dual-Head UV Edition at $2,899 adds fluorescent neon inks for blacklight effects and specialized soft and hard white inks for materials like leather. The UV + Fabric Edition at $2,999 is the full cross-category hybrid, covering both hard goods and garment workflows through the OEKO-TEX certified fabric system. All three share the Pixel-Scan Vision System and xTool Studio, keeping the intelligence layer consistent across the lineup.

UV printing at the studio scale has historically required dedicated ventilation and careful ink handling, which kept the workflow inside commercial print shops. The O1 uses GREENGUARD-certified, non-reprotoxic inks and an advanced built-in air filtration system to eliminate odors in home studios. SmartCycle 2.0 automates routine care to prevent clogging, offering 14-day vacation-ready support that lets users step away with confidence and return to a machine that is ready to run. The Dual-Head UV Edition adds specialized flexible white inks, expanding the material list to leather goods and flexible substrates. Taken together, these decisions position the O1 as a machine built to live in a real creative workspace, not parked in the back corner of a commercial print shop.

The O1 Embroidery made its first public hands-on appearance at the Next Level Conference x xTool SMB Summit on August 27, putting the platform’s most dimensional textile output in front of the small business creators it is built for. Desktop UV printing has heated up considerably in 2026, with machines like the eufyMake E1 generating real market attention, and the O1 is making a clear bid for the consolidation position in that category. The 6,000-unit, $20 million day-one performance signals the market was ready for this hardware category long before the product arrived. Explore the full xTool O1 Omni Printer lineup and configure your edition at xTool’s website.

Click Here to Buy Now: $1899 $2499 ($600 off). Hurry, deal ends in 48-hours!

The post xTool O1 Omni UV Printer Prints on Wood, Metal, Glass, and Your T-Shirts, All From One Desktop Machine first appeared on Yanko Design.

No Halo, Just Pure Sculpture: The Ferrari F1 Concept That Looks Too Good for 2026 Rules

Posted on by

Back in 2015, Ferrari’s own Centro Stile design studio floated a wild pitch: what if F1 cars actually looked cool again, without breaking a single technical regulation? They called it the F1 Concept, gave it a twin deck front wing and bodywork wrapped around the wheels like a second skin, and then, predictably, nothing happened with it. Formula 1 kept getting bigger, heavier, and angrier looking, right up until the FIA finally admitted the cars needed a diet for 2026. A decade later, an Italian designer working out of Modena picked that argument back up and ran with it, and honestly, he might have done Ferrari’s own studio one better.

The car comes from Luca Serafini, who runs LS Design and has spent years building a body of work out of asking what Ferrari would look like if the brand trusted its instincts a little more. He is the same designer behind last year’s alternative take on the 849 Testarossa, done with 3D modeler Aldo Russo, where he argued the goal was updating a heritage cue’s logic rather than copying its shape. That same instinct shows up here. This single seater takes the open wheel racer silhouette everyone knows from Sunday afternoons and smooths it into something closer to sculpture, ditching the sponsor decals and the visual noise of a modern grid car entirely.

Designer: Luca Serafini, LS Design

The front wheels get faired into flowing bodywork that flows straight back into the sidepods, while the rears stay fully exposed on yellow banded slicks, which is the whole thesis of the car in one glance. Everywhere else, the surfacing does something almost nobody in real motorsport bothers with anymore. Instead of vanes, barge boards, and serrated flics doing the aerodynamic talking, one unbroken red volume falls from the nose through a soft shoulder into the rear haunch, like the whole car got poured rather than assembled from a parts bin. The black splitter, floor, and rear wing sit underneath like a visible chassis holding the sculpture up.

There is no halo here, which will be the first thing any F1 fan notices. In its place sits a swept structural screen bridging the cockpit opening, more IndyCar aeroscreen than F1 safety cage, with a periscope style airbox scoop rising behind the driver’s head that feels pulled straight out of the 1970s. It is a gorgeous solution and also the most fragile part of the whole pitch, since real single seater regulations exist specifically because open cockpits keep taking hits from flying debris.

Every render is staged inside an actual Ferrari garage, wet pit apron and all, with mechanics crouched over tire guns and Pirelli racks lined up against the wall like this car is minutes from a real session. The Rosso Corsa paint carries a white central spine from nose to airbox, reading more like a 1960s prototype stripe than anything you would see sponsored on a modern grid. Five spoke centerlock wheels, blue center nuts, a swan neck rear wing. It is close enough to real that you start forgetting it was never built to survive contact with the actual rulebook.

That rulebook, as it happens, just got rewritten against this exact silhouette. The 2026 regulations specifically remove the wheel arch fairings that curved over the front tires on recent cars, bringing barge boards back to manage the wake those fairings used to hide. Minimum weight drops thirty kilograms, wheelbase shrinks two hundred millimeters, and every gram of that smooth, appendage free bodywork Serafini drew would cost real lap time on a real circuit. None of that makes the car worse to look at. It just means this is a styling argument dressed up as a race car, not the other way around, and it happens to be a better looking argument than anything currently sitting on the actual 2026 grid.

We have seen designers wrestle with cockpit safety before, including Olcay Tuncay Karabulut’s closed canopy F1 concept we covered a while back, which tackled the same halo problem from the opposite direction. Serafini’s screen splits the difference between that fully enclosed canopy and the open halo drivers race with today, and it does not fully solve either car’s problem. What it does is remind you how much personality F1 gave up chasing regulation compliance, one flap and winglet at a time.

The post No Halo, Just Pure Sculpture: The Ferrari F1 Concept That Looks Too Good for 2026 Rules first appeared on Yanko Design.

IFA CEO Leif Lindner: This Year Isn’t About Cool Demos. It’s About Robots That Actually Work

Posted on by

Berlin does this every September, and it never stops being slightly overwhelming. IFA 2026 runs September 4 to 8 across 27 halls at Messe Berlin, with more than 1,900 brands and something like 220,000 people wandering through them. This year the theme is “The Future Is Now”, which sounds like a slogan until you see the schedule. Humanoid robots are walking a catwalk on September 5. Xiaomi is exhibiting for the first time in the show’s 102-year history. There is a robot football tournament. Somewhere in there, several hundred companies will also try to sell you a better toaster.

We wanted to know how a show like that gets built, so we sat down with Leif Lindner, CEO of IFA Management, who has been running the thing since 2023. We last spoke to him in 2024, back when AI was still being called a race rather than a bubble. Plenty has changed. Robots got legs, Chinese manufacturers got fast, and AI quietly stopped being a category and became the water everything swims in. Lindner has thoughts about all of it, including a good one about what 70 kilos of biped requires backstage.

AI Stopped Being a Special Feature

Every IFA has a theme, but this year’s grew out of something Lindner watched happen in real time rather than something the marketing team dreamed up in a room. “For years we talked about AI, robotics and connected living as the future,” he told us. “Somewhere along the way, that changed. AI stopped being a standalone category and became part of almost every category.” Refrigerators, earbuds and treadmills all carry it now, and none of them were sold to you as AI products first.

That shift changes what Lindner looks for on the floor these days. “A few years ago, the conversation was simply, does this product use AI,” he said. “Today, the better question is, what does AI actually enable. Does it simplify a task. Does it save time. Does it help you make a better decision.” The companies worth your attention this year, in his view, are the ones who stopped mentioning AI out loud and just let it work.

China Built the Runway, Europe is Preparing to Walk On It

The single loudest theme at IFA 2026 is humanoid robots, and the roster reads like a map of China’s supply chain. Unitree, Agibot, DEEP Robotics and a dozen others are walking a literal catwalk on September 5 called Robots on the Runway, and Lindner does not dodge why they got there first. “Manufacturing scale, deep investment and an incredibly integrated supply chain mean companies can iterate very quickly,” he said. “When design, engineering, production and testing are all happening within the same ecosystem, ideas naturally move from prototype to product much faster.”

He is quick to add that Europe is not simply behind. “Europe has extraordinary strengths of its own, in engineering, industrial manufacturing, AI and responsible technology development,” he told us, pointing to NEURA Robotics as the proof. The German firm closed a funding round of up to 1.4 billion dollars just before the show and delivers a keynote titled “From Europe, for the World: Building the Ecosystem for Physical AI” barely 90 minutes after the robots finish their runway walk. “The conversation isn’t about catching up category by category,” Lindner said. “It’s about building an ecosystem that allows European innovation to compete on a global stage.”

The One Robot Actually Cleared to Sell in the EU

Buried in that same conversation is a detail that separates the showpieces from the products. AiMOGA’s Mornine, built by a unit of Chinese carmaker Chery, holds full EU CE certification covering machinery safety, radio equipment and cybersecurity, signed off by German testing house TÜV Rheinland. That makes it the first humanoid certified on both hardware and software under EU rules, and it already works shifts in car dealerships across more than 30 countries.

Lindner treats that milestone as the real dividing line on his own show floor. “That’s certainly a meaningful milestone because it reflects the transition from a technology demonstration to a product that’s ready for commercial deployment in Europe,” he said. “Many of the robots visitors will see at IFA are there to demonstrate what’s possible. Others are much closer to real-world deployment. You can see the entire innovation journey in one place.”

What It Takes to Put a Robot on Stage

None of this happens by accident, and Lindner is refreshingly candid about how much invisible work sits behind five minutes of a robot walking in a straight line. “Any live demonstration involving emerging technology requires careful planning, and robotics is no exception,” he said. “Safety comes first, and our exhibitors work closely with our teams to make sure demonstrations are planned and delivered responsibly.”

His closing line on the subject is the best quote in the whole conversation. “When you put a 70-kilo humanoid robot in front of a live audience, you want the excitement to be on the stage, not behind it.” Worth remembering the next time a robot sticks a landing and the crowd gasps. Somebody spent months making sure that gasp was the only surprise in the room.

The post IFA CEO Leif Lindner: This Year Isn’t About Cool Demos. It’s About Robots That Actually Work first appeared on Yanko Design.

MB&F’s Alien-Inspired Desk Clock Ships as 222 Loose Parts You Assemble Yourself Over 10 Hours

Posted on by

There is a term in behavioral economics called the IKEA effect, which says we value things more when we build them ourselves. It explains why you defend that wobbly BILLY bookcase like it’s family. MB&F and French clockmaker Maison Alcée have taken that idea, put it in a suit, and charged CHF 12,000 for it. Their new desk clock arrives at your door as 222 loose components in a wooden box, along with a set of watchmaking tools and a 250-page book. You are the assembly line, and the clock does not tell time until you make it.

It’s called the Nostromo, and it looks like a chrome beetle crouching on your desk. Maximilian Maertens, MB&F’s creative designer and Max Büsser’s anointed successor, designed it to celebrate 15 years of the M.A.D.Gallery. Maison Alcée manufactures the parts in the French and Swiss Jura, then hands the fun part to you. Roughly ten hours of tweezer work stand between the box and a running mechanical clock with a 14-day power reserve and a switchable hour chime. Only the regulating organ arrives pre-built, because some things are best left to people who do this for a living. Fifty pieces exist.

Designer: Maximilian Maertens for MB&F, crafted by Maison Alcée

The body is a symmetrical steel ovoid, two brushed arcs meeting top and bottom, wrapped around brass wheels and a saturated peacock blue dial ring floating dead center. That silhouette reads as carapace rather than xenomorph, closer to a scarab than anything H.R. Giger ever airbrushed. Every ounce of creature in this object lives in the three tapered legs below, which sweep outward in compound curves and end in points. Maertens had to leave the movement architecture assemblable by amateurs, so the sculpture went where the freedom was.

That movement comes from the Persée, Maison Alcée’s first clock, launched in 2022 and built on wristwatch architecture scaled up to desk size. Maertens turned the whole thing on its side, angled the display upward for easier reading, and split the Persée’s continuous dial ring into segments so the gear train shows through the gaps. The finished clock rotates on its feet, which sounds like a gimmick until you remember three-point support never rocks on an uneven desk. Black hands replace the originals for contrast against all that brass. The changes are small in engineering terms and enormous in posture.

Slotted screws sit visible across every plate, the steel is brushed instead of polished, and the brass wheels carry plain spokes with no anglage anywhere. That reads as a deliberate call rather than a cost saving, because every one of those surfaces will be handled by someone in cotton gloves who has never held tweezers. Maison Alcée even had its screwdriver blades made in a copper-beryllium alloy, softening them specifically to reduce the risk of scratching your own clock. The kit includes seventeen tools, several adapted for beginners. The pedagogy runs all the way down to the hardware.

Ridley Scott borrowed the name Nostromo from a Joseph Conrad novel, and Ron Cobb designed the ship as a grimy commercial tugboat crewed by people arguing about bonuses. Giger got the monster and the derelict. Most of us have merged the two in memory, which is why the word now sounds biomechanical. Maertens, a self-declared Giger obsessive, has effectively put Cobb’s name on a Giger-adjacent body, and I doubt anyone at MB&F loses sleep over it. The brand has been mining outer space since HM1 in 2007.

CHF 12,000 ($14,840 USD) excluding VAT, sold through the M.A.D.Galleries in Geneva and Dubai and MB&F LABs worldwide, with deliveries landing October to November. A base Persée runs closer to EUR 5,500 ($6,379 USD), so the premium buys the Maertens design and the 50-piece cap rather than more mechanism. Here’s the catch, though. A company whose entire philosophy is teaching horology through your own hands has capped this particular lesson at fifty units for fifty eager students. The clock is wonderful. The classroom is very small.

The post MB&F’s Alien-Inspired Desk Clock Ships as 222 Loose Parts You Assemble Yourself Over 10 Hours first appeared on Yanko Design.

Rezvani Beast X: The 1,560 HP American Hypercar Wearing a Fighter Jet’s Aero Kit Over a Corvette’s Body

Posted on by

Ferris Rezvani grew up on air bases watching his dad fly F-4 Phantoms, wanted to be a pilot, got told no for health reasons, and decided the next best thing was making cars that scared people the same way. That origin story has been decorating press releases for a decade. The Beast X is the first Rezvani where the hardware backs it up, with canards, an S duct venting through three raised hood strakes, fender extractors, a roof scoop and a twin hoop rear wing sitting over a triple exit exhaust buried in the diffuser. It costs around $500,000, only five will exist, and Rezvani claims 1,560 horsepower.

That figure comes from a bespoke twin turbo 6.2 liter V8 with forged internals, driving all four wheels through an eight speed dual clutch for a claimed 1.9 seconds to 60. Underneath all of it sits a Corvette C8, which Rezvani’s spec page pointedly declines to name while listing a 107.2 inch wheelbase and 48.6 inch height that match Chevrolet’s exactly. The body is five inches longer and six inches wider. Everything Rezvani actually designed happens in those six inches, and the cabin gives the rest of the game away.

Designer: Rezvani Motors

The dive planes flanking the nose push air around the front wheels instead of into them, cutting front lift at speed. The S duct punches two vertical slots through the hood so pressurized air trapped under the splitter has somewhere to escape upward, a piece of open wheel racing hardware that has no business on a road car and shows up here anyway. Fender extractors pull hot, turbulent air out from the wheel wells before it can drag on the body. The twin hoop wing sits high on carbon pylons, clear of the turbulence coming off the roofline, and the triple exit exhaust clusters dead center in the diffuser instead of tucked at a corner. None of it is decorative. Every panel is doing one specific aerodynamic job, which is the difference between a body kit and an aero package.

Magnesium wheels cut seven pounds of unsprung mass at each corner, meaningful because unsprung weight is what suspension has to control on every bump rather than just accelerate. Adaptive double wishbone suspension handles the rest. That’s real engineering spend, and it’s where a chunk of the $500,000 clearly goes, even with the donor chassis unnamed on the spec sheet.

Open the door and the C8 shows through. The vertical wall of climate buttons running down the center stack is unchanged Chevrolet hardware, retrimmed in Alcantara and leather with contrast stitching and a Beast X badge on the wheel. Rezvani is doing what Italian coachbuilders did for decades, buying a proven chassis and building a new body over it, except the receipts and the fantasy are published on the same webpage. The exterior is a genuine transformation. The interior is a retrim job with better stitching.

Chevrolet’s own ZR1X makes 1,250 horsepower, hits 60 in 1.89 seconds, and starts at $207,395 with a factory warranty. Rezvani wants roughly $293,000 more for six extra inches of width, a full carbon body, and a production cap of five cars, with no independent dyno numbers behind the 1,560 hp claim yet. That’s either a steep markup for a retrim or the going rate for a body engineered like it has to survive actual airflow at speed and a promise that only four other people on earth will own one. Rezvani’s reservation lists have filled fast before. Nothing here suggests this run will be the exception.

The post Rezvani Beast X: The 1,560 HP American Hypercar Wearing a Fighter Jet’s Aero Kit Over a Corvette’s Body first appeared on Yanko Design.