Tag Archives: editorial

5 Things the iPhone Duo Got Right That Samsung Still Hasn’t

Posted on by

Samsung has had the folding phone conversation to itself for six years now, tweaking hinges, shrinking creases, and figuring out what a cover screen is even for. Apple waited, watched, and let its rival make every mistake first. That patience shows in the iPhone Duo, a first-generation foldable that skipped straight past problems Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold8 still hasn’t fully solved.

None of that comes cheap, though. The Duo starts at $1,999 and costs more than the Fold8’s $1,899.99, weighs in at roughly nine ounces against the Fold8’s seven, and folds up thicker in your pocket, besides. Samsung still wins those arguments outright, and we’ll get back to that later. But set weight and price aside, because here are five places where Apple’s first foldable actually beat Samsung’s eighth attempt.

Designer: Apple

The Camera That Disappears

A foldable phone’s whole pitch is the screen, one continuous surface that opens up into something closer to a small tablet. Every notch or punch-hole cut into that surface breaks the illusion a little, reminding you that the software is still working around a sensor buried in the glass. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold8 has never quite escaped that compromise, even eight generations in.

The Galaxy Z Fold8 carries a 10-megapixel camera punched into both the inner and cover displays, a hole you notice every time the screen lights up. The Duo takes a different route entirely, tucking its inner selfie camera under the panel itself so nothing interrupts the display when you’re watching a movie or scrolling through photos with both halves open. The outer screen keeps a single, smaller cutout.

A Stylus Samsung Gave Up On

Samsung built its whole Note legacy around the S Pen, then carried that stylus into the first few generations of the Galaxy Z Fold before quietly dropping it this cycle. Neither the Galaxy Z Fold8 nor the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra bring it back, leaving a gap for anyone who used to sketch, sign, or jot notes onto that big inner display. It’s a strange retreat for a company built on that exact feature.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

Apple Pencil support changes that, working on both the 5.4-inch cover screen and the 7.6-inch inner display, once it arrives. Dual-screen support lands through a software update later this year rather than at launch, so early buyers will have to wait a bit for the full experience. Still, it means signing a document or sketching an idea won’t require unfolding the phone first, something Samsung’s lineup can no longer offer.

Built to Survive the Mess

Dust is the part of durability testing everyone forgets about until it’s too late, and a folding hinge is the worst possible place for grit to sneak into. Water resistance ratings get all the marketing attention, but the dust half of an IP rating tells you whether sand at the beach or fine construction dust will actually make it past the seals and start scratching at the mechanism underneath.

The iPhone Duo carries an IP68 rating, meaning the seal is dust-tight; nothing gets through, full stop. The Galaxy Z Fold8 only manages IP48, which covers water fine but leaves that dust digit low enough that fine particles, sand, and powder aren’t actually kept out. For anyone who takes their foldable to a beach, a workshop, or just a dusty backpack, that gap matters more than it looks.

Room for Everything You Shoot

A foldable’s bigger inner screen practically begs you to shoot more video and drag around heavier files, whether that’s 4K footage, a stack of RAW photos, or a library of apps you’d never bother installing on a regular phone. Storage stops being an afterthought pretty quickly once you’re using the extra screen real estate the way it’s meant to be used, for actual creative work instead of just bigger icons.

Apple tops out the iPhone Duo at 2TB of storage, double what the Galaxy Z Fold8 offers at its 1TB ceiling. That’s the difference between planning around your camera roll on a long trip and simply forgetting storage exists as a problem. For anyone who treats their foldable as a mobile production tool rather than a bigger email client, that extra headroom ends up mattering more than the megapixel count.

Fighting the Fold’s Oldest Flaw

The crease down the middle of a folding screen has been the one problem no manufacturer has fully cracked, Samsung included, no matter how many generations they’ve shipped. Apple’s approach to the Duo’s hinge stacks a nano-texture matte layer over glide-adhesive glass and backs the whole assembly with a titanium plate, an engineering answer to a problem that’s mostly been treated as unavoidable elsewhere in the industry.

Early impressions from outlets with briefing access suggest the crease is still visible. Nobody’s claiming otherwise, but it doesn’t catch your finger or your attention the way it does on most rivals, the Galaxy Z Fold8 included. That’s worth flagging as an early read rather than a verified result, since neither phone has landed in reviewers’ hands yet. Outdoor glare handling gets similar praise, though the real test comes once these ship.

What Samsung Still Gets Right

None of this makes the Galaxy Z Fold8 a bad phone, and Samsung still wins the arguments that matter most to plenty of buyers. It’s $99.01 cheaper, noticeably lighter at roughly seven ounces against the Duo’s nine, and thinner whether it’s folded shut in your pocket or opened flat on a desk. Those are real, measurable advantages, not consolation prizes.

Apple iPhone Duo

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

What you’re really choosing between is a phone that’s been refined for eight generations and one making its very first attempt, price and weight included. A first try that already beats its rival on a camera, a stylus, a durability rating, storage, and a hinge design is a strong opening argument, whatever it costs to get there. Samsung’s turn to respond comes next year.

The post 5 Things the iPhone Duo Got Right That Samsung Still Hasn’t first appeared on Yanko Design.

This Single UI Trick Might Sell More iPhone Duo Units Than Any Android Foldable

Posted on by

Let me be clear. There’s no universe in which I think 2 thousand dollars is the right price for a smartphone. The fact that it folds, or that John Ternus called it an ‘intelligent hub’ doesn’t justify a price tag that’s reserved for gaming laptops. However, when I saw the Duo open for the first time in Apple’s keynote, I definitely sat up a bit and embodied the Leonardo DiCaprio meme where he snaps and points at the screen. Something caught my eye, and in those brief seconds, I forgot that the iPhone Duo costs $1999 USD.

Go to the comments section of any tech blogger interacting with the iPhone Duo and you’ll see the same response – “Whoever designed that opening closing UI animation deserves a raise.” Apple managed to do something so fundamentally different from any smartphone out there, it made the iPhone Duo truly feel a class apart. Open (or close the phone) and a section of the display magically disappears and reappears from a digital ether. It doesn’t feel like your phone’s screen is expanding the way it does on the Pixel Fold or the Galaxy Z Fold 8. It feels like the flap of your phone is basically a piece of frosted glass, overlaying over a phone screen that’s already there. Words fail to describe how beautiful it looks, but literally everyone had the same visceral reaction for the first time seeing Apple pull off this digital optical illusion. It’s gorgeous, and for some people it might just be the deciding factor between buying an Android foldable or the iPhone Duo.

Designer: Apple

Royole debuted the first foldable phone in 2018. The Flexpai didn’t push too many units, it wasn’t from a reputed brand either which meant zero brand recall or trust. Still, it made waves for being the first to crack the foldable format. Samsung soon followed, with their first foldable the following year. So, effectively since 2019, the world has asked itself A. whether Apple will ever launch an iPhone… and B. What will Apple do so differently that it’ll absolutely capture the minds and hearts of the entire market. We found out the answers to both yesterday.

The “Different” manifests itself in a few ways. For starters, the iPhone Duo is much wider than most foldables, which opt for a tall design that results in a weird square-ish screen when opened. The Duo’s approach is a more passport-style aspect ratio, with a 1:1.4 format which sits right in the middle of a 2:3 and a 3:4 design. This wide body means a more usable screen experience in both closed and open variants, with the same aspect ratio carrying across open and closed formats – something every interface designer will cry tears of joy over.

This unique form factor required designing the OS to operate differently too. While every iPhone, iPad, and even MacBook has centered itself around the bottom horizontal app dock, the Duo shifts the dock to the right, making it vertical instead. The dynamic island becomes vertical too, and the entire experience (while it requires a learning curve) is designed for seamless single-hand use, or even double hand use without needing to switch hand position. The power button on the right edge packs TouchID too, pretty much consolidating every important hardware and software detail to the right of the screen now. Great for right-handed folks, but the lefties might object to this strange exclusion.

The most impressive “different,” however, is how your phone responds to you opening it. Every foldable till now has resorted to the simple trick of either A. having the folded screen power on when unfolded, or B. having the screen on, but the icons/elements arrange themselves to match the new layout. Apple’s approach was different, leaning heavily into its use of the glass effect from last year’s iOS 26 rollout. The animation feels almost like flipping a piece of frosted glass, revealing the iPhone’s screen once the phone’s folded all the way open or closed. Technically, there’s nothing Apple did that was groundbreakingly different with the interface – but this one little animation was enough to really captivate the hearts of every single person who saw the keynote.

Will the Duo be a runaway success? It’s difficult to predict this early, but the iPhone Air and the Vision Pro were (by Apple’s own standards) extremely underwhelming. Pair that with the fact that people already trust foldables less and you get a pretty bleak forecast for the iPhone Duo. But here’s where I’m inclined to believe that it might sell well. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 8 is currently outperforming its Ultra counterpart. People REALLY seem to enjoy the flat and wide foldable, and the Z Fold 8’s $1899 price tag hasn’t been an overwhelming deterrent so far. For anyone who has the money and the appetite for a foldable, the iPhone Duo might just end up blowing demand for the Z Fold 8 (and the Xiaomi 18 Fold) out of the water. At just hundred bucks more than Samsung’s counterpart, the Duo really packs a one-two punch with a competitive price match, and more importantly, that gorgeous glasslike open/shut animation. I’m not saying the animation is the reason people will buy this phone, but it’s easily a compelling reason for anyone looking to throw near 2K on a folding device.

The post This Single UI Trick Might Sell More iPhone Duo Units Than Any Android Foldable first appeared on Yanko Design.

Apple is Building a Short, Wide iPhone Ultra… Now It Owes Us an Actual iPhone Mini

Posted on by

I have a friend who still uses an iPhone 13 mini held together by a case and pure spite, and every single time a new iPhone launches, she asks me the same question. Is it small yet. It never is. Apple has spent years telling us, implicitly, that small phones do not sell, that the market has spoken, that everyone wants a bigger canvas for videos and games and doomscrolling. Fine, sure, the sales numbers backed that up in 2023. But sales numbers do not mean the desire disappeared, they mean the alternative was not good enough to fight for.

Which brings me to the iPhone Ultra, Apple’s rumored first foldable, expected to close into a short, squat, almost passport-shaped little brick before you unfold it into something the size of an iPad mini. That folded shape is the closest thing to mini energy Apple has shown in years, and it is buried inside a two thousand dollar folding phone nobody asked to be the delivery method. My friend does not want an iPad mini that folds. She wants her 13 mini, but new. Apple already built the shape. It just built it around the wrong phone.

Designer: Apple

The Air existed to answer a question almost nobody was asking at checkout, namely how thin can a phone get before the internals start filing complaints. It was a genuine engineering flex, the kind of thing that looks incredible in a teardown video and slightly pointless in daily use. I understood what it was trying to prove. I just never needed it proven to me personally, and I doubt I was alone in that.

The Ultra is rumored to repeat that exact flex, except this time the thinness gets folded in half, closing down to somewhere between 9 and 9.5mm shut and reportedly as thin as 4.5mm open, according to recent leaks. That is a genuinely wild number for a phone with a hinge in it. Apple is once again proving it can do the hard, borderline unnecessary engineering thing. The difference is that this time, buried inside that flex, is an actual shape people have been begging for since 2023. Apple just does not seem to have noticed it yet.

Go back and look at what the 13 mini actually was for a second, because I think people forget how unremarkable the compromise really was. It measured 131.5mm tall, 64.2mm wide, weighed 141 grams, and ran the exact same A15 chip as the standard 13. You gave up battery life and screen real estate. You did not give up the flagship experience shrunk down to fit an actual hand. Compare that to where the standard iPhone lineup sits today, regularly north of 6.1 inches before you even get to Pro Max territory, and the gap the mini used to fill has only gotten wider and lonelier.

Now put the Ultra’s folded footprint next to that. Reports point to a 5.5 inch cover display when shut, in a short, wide, passport style shell that is about as close to mini adjacent proportions as Apple has shipped since the mini died. The catch is that this compact shell only exists as a doorway into a 7.8 inch, 4:3 inner screen and a starting price rumored to land somewhere between 1,999 and 2,499 dollars. Nobody buying that phone is buying it to have something small in their pocket. They are buying an iPad mini that happens to fold shut, which is a completely different pitch than the one my friend has been asking me about for three years running.

There has been some loose speculation, mostly a 9to5Mac piece from last year, that Apple’s new staggered launch schedule could theoretically clear a runway for a smaller phone somewhere down the line. Even that piece called the odds slim to none, and nothing currently on Apple’s roadmap for the 18, 18e, 18 Pro, or Ultra includes a mini in any form. Samsung, for what it is worth, has stuck with its Z Flip clamshell as its own answer to compact, so the appetite for small has not vanished industry wide, it has just gone unanswered on Apple’s side of the fence for a while now.

So here is the pitch, and it is not a complicated one. Apple has now proven twice, once with the Air and once with the Ultra’s folded shell, that it can engineer real compactness without breaking anything important. Skip the fold. Skip the tablet trapped inside a phone shaped envelope. Take that exact short, wide, passport sized footprint and wrap a single, non folding screen around it, call it a mini, and ship it. Apple does not need a new idea here. It already built one. It just keeps hiding it inside features nobody was asking it to attach to.

The post Apple is Building a Short, Wide iPhone Ultra… Now It Owes Us an Actual iPhone Mini first appeared on Yanko Design.

Xiaomi Takes the IFA 2026 Spotlight as Samsung Makes A Quiet Exit After 35 Years

Posted on by

Imagine spending 35 years building the most recognizable booth at the world’s biggest consumer electronics show, then deciding one year to just… not. That is exactly what Samsung is doing at IFA 2026. The company is hosting its own event at the Humboldt Carré, a conference venue in central Berlin, eight kilometers from Messe, starting September 2, two days before the official show opens. Samsung frames this as a focused environment for media briefings, retail meetings, and product launches, following the same logic it applied at CES 2026 when it left the Las Vegas Convention Center for the Wynn Hotel. Doing it twice in the same year starts to look less like a pivot and more like a policy.

While Samsung manages its event across town, Xiaomi is inside Messe Berlin, confirmed for Hall 6.2, with a full ecosystem pitch and no obvious competitor stealing the spotlight. Xiaomi announced its IFA commitment at the official IFA Kick-Off on June 30, attaching a €7.4 billion AI R&D budget to the news, covering electric vehicles, robotics, and operating systems through 2028. Its IoT platform connects over 1.16 billion devices as of mid-2026, which gives the “Human x Car x Home” pitch real substance beyond the marketing copy. Samsung will sponsor the IFA Creator Hub, a content studio for influencers at Palais am Funkturm. But a sponsorship is a very different thing from anchoring a show floor, and Xiaomi is anchoring the show floor.

Photo Credits: IFA

At CES 2026, Samsung left the Las Vegas Convention Center for the Wynn Hotel and applied museum-style layout techniques to give visitors more time with each product. The Humboldt Carré plan at IFA runs on exactly the same idea, consolidating launches, tech forums, and partner meetings under one roof with dedicated space for hands-on AI appliance experiences. Samsung also has a footprint inside Messe Berlin as the main sponsor of the IFA Creator Hub, a content studio for influencers at Palais am Funkturm. It will run its own programming there throughout show week. But sponsoring a content studio is a different brand position from anchoring a product booth, and on the Messe floor, that position now belongs to whoever occupies it.

Photo Credits: IFA

Reports place the Galaxy S26 FE launch on September 4, the same day IFA officially opens, which means every journalist in Berlin will be writing about a Samsung phone from inside a building Samsung chose not to be in. LG, TCL, and Hisense all held their hall bookings and published their stand numbers months ago. Xiaomi is in Hall 6.2, a short walk from the main press areas. The reporters who glance up from S26 FE coverage will be standing next to Samsung’s biggest competitors. The brand generating the most ambient attention on the Messe floor will simply be the one that actually showed up.

Xiaomi’s pitch at IFA 2026 carries weight because the company has actually built the ecosystem it is selling. Its IoT platform connects over 1.16 billion devices as of June 2026, phones and laptops excluded, which gives the “Human x Car x Home” framing real shelf-stocking credibility for European retailers. The €7.4 billion AI R&D commitment for 2026 to 2028, spanning electric vehicles, robotics, and operating systems, is sized for institutional buyers rather than spec-sheet readers. Xiaomi landed on the Fortune Global 500 for the seventh consecutive year in July 2026, ranked 232nd. It arrives at IFA knowing exactly what it wants from a European room, and with the numbers to back that up.

Photo Credits: IFA

Samsung’s controlled-environment strategy has a clean logic that gets harder to apply the bigger the show it leaves behind. Moving off the floor eliminates accidental comparisons, crowded aisles, and competitor booths visible from your own press conference, but it also removes the organic brand visibility a trade show generates just by being a trade show. Xiaomi does not have that problem this year. It is physically present in the room where buying decisions happen, where retail partnerships get formed over product demos, and where IFA’s roughly 220,000 annual visitors walk through looking for the next big thing. If the floor plan is the argument, Xiaomi is winning it before the doors even open.

The post Xiaomi Takes the IFA 2026 Spotlight as Samsung Makes A Quiet Exit After 35 Years first appeared on Yanko Design.

Galaxy Z Fold 8 vs Fold 8 Ultra: Why the ‘Better’ Phone is a Worse Deal

Posted on by

PCMag spent real time with both new Samsung foldables and walked away calling the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra the most capable foldable the company has ever shipped. Then it gave its Editors’ Choice award to the cheaper one anyway. That’s a strange thing to watch happen in real time, kind of like a judge handing the trophy to the runner who finished second because they liked her shoes better. Samsung built a $2,099.99 phone with a 200MP main camera, a 3x telephoto lens, a bigger battery, and the largest screens in the Fold lineup, and the people paid to obsess over spec sheets shrugged and picked the $1,899.99 model instead.

Forbes landed in the same spot. So did Android Police, in a review literally titled around the Ultra’s problem being the other phone. The Ultra is winning almost every line item on paper, and almost nobody who has actually used both wants to pay extra for it. Something broke in Samsung’s foldable hierarchy this year, and I don’t think $200 is where you’ll find the crack.

Designer: Samsung

Here’s the part that should embarrass the Ultra a little. Both phones run the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, carry the same storage and RAM tiers, and charge at the same 45W wired speed. The Ultra’s real advantages are a 200MP main sensor against the standard Fold 8’s 50MP, an extra 10MP telephoto with 3x optical zoom, and a 5,000mAh battery next to the Fold 8’s 4,800mAh. That last gap is worth about one extra hour of video playback by Samsung’s own numbers, which is not nothing, but it’s also not $200 of nothing. You’re basically paying a camera tax dressed up as a flagship tax.

The engineering story underneath both phones is actually the good part, and it’s the part nobody’s arguing about. Flex Titanium tucks an alloy film thinner than a third of a human hair under the OLED panel, backed by a titanium plate for flatness, and reviewers who’ve run a finger across the open screen say the crease is basically gone. GSMArena called it more uniform and flat under direct touch. I’ll admit I didn’t expect Samsung to actually solve this after years of “reduced crease” claims that meant “still very much a crease.” This year it sounds like they meant it.

That fix cost something, and Samsung didn’t exactly advertise the trade. Flex Mode, the half-open laptop stance the Fold line has offered forever, no longer works on the standard Fold 8 because the new hinge can’t hold itself at 90 degrees. It survives on the Ultra, barely, described by reviewers as fiddly to trigger. Nobody put that on a spec sheet, and it’s a bigger design story than either phone’s camera bump.

Which brings me to the actual confusion. The Ultra name is supposed to mean “take the flagship, stack on the best of everything, charge more,” the way it works on the S series. This year the Ultra is following the Fold 7’s shape while the plain Fold 8 ships an entirely new passport-style body, different aspect ratio, different case ecosystem, zero parts compatibility. 9to5Google flat out called the Ultra the boring option this generation. Two phones share a family name and nothing else, and the one without the suffix is the one people actually want to talk about.

I’d take the regular Fold 8. Not because the Ultra is bad, it clearly isn’t, but because Samsung finally shipped a foldable shape that argues for itself instead of a spec sheet arguing for you. That’s rarer than a good camera.

The post Galaxy Z Fold 8 vs Fold 8 Ultra: Why the ‘Better’ Phone is a Worse Deal first appeared on Yanko Design.

Weber Is Shutting Off the June Oven’s AI Camera, and a $90 Air Fryer Already Does The Same Thing

Posted on by

Somewhere in a warehouse in Illinois, someone at Weber is about to flip a switch that turns a $999 oven back into a very expensive toaster. On September 22, the June Oven loses its cloud, its app, and the camera trick that made it famous in the first place. You can still push the manual buttons. You just lose the part where the oven looks at your chicken thighs and quietly figures out what to do with them.

Here’s the kicker. That exact party trick, the camera that scans your food and picks a cook program for you, now lives inside air fryers that cost less than a nice dinner out. June invented food recognition cooking in 2015 for fifteen hundred bucks. A decade later you can buy the same basic idea for under a hundred dollars on Amazon. The technology didn’t get worse. It just stopped being special enough to protect.

Daewoo Actuate

Weber hasn’t put out a press release about any of this, which tells you plenty on its own. Owners found out by email. Meanwhile the company has been actively expanding Weber Connect, the smart grilling platform June’s own engineers helped build, across its charcoal and gas lineup. So the message, whether Weber meant to send it or not, is that connected cooking tech is worth investing in when it’s attached to a grill, and worth quietly switching off when it’s attached to a toaster oven nobody’s manufacturing anymore.

Daewoo’s Actuate is the cheapest, dumbest version of June’s original idea, and I mean dumbest as a compliment. An internal camera peeks at whatever’s in the basket, matches it against twelve presets like chips, sausages, and chicken, and sets the time and temperature without asking you to tap through a menu. It runs about ninety to a hundred dollars depending on the retailer and the day. No app, no account, no subscription. It just watches your dinner and gets on with it.

Culinix 8.5QT AI air fryer

Here’s where it gets fun. Culinix sells an 8.5 quart fryer in the US with an AI camera that recognizes twelve foods, and the list reads like it was lifted straight off Daewoo’s spec sheet. Chicken goujon. Fish finger. Beef joint. Chick pea. That is oddly specific British supermarket vocabulary to land on two unrelated product pages by coincidence. My guess is neither brand invented this camera module, they just bought the same one off a factory shelf and slapped their own logo on the box, the same way every USB charger secretly comes from three factories in Shenzhen.

Emerson skipped the camera entirely and gave its SmartVoice fryers ears instead. Say “cook pork chops” and it just does it, no app, no wifi, all the processing happening locally on the device. It’s not glamorous, but it solves a real problem for people who find touchscreens fiddly, whether that’s arthritis, low vision, or just being elbow deep in raw chicken and unable to tap anything. I’d argue this is the most quietly useful of the three schools, even though it’ll never trend on a gadget blog.

Dreo ChefMaker

Xiaomi and Dreo took the opposite bet and gave up on guessing entirely. Xiaomi’s Mijia Pro adds a water tank so it can steam and sous vide alongside the usual hot air, which actually changes the physics of what comes out the other end. Dreo’s ChefMaker goes further and sticks a probe straight into the meat, measuring real internal temperature instead of inferring anything from a camera. It’s the only method here that isn’t a guess.

Which brings us back to June. Anova’s newer oven has the same food recognition camera, except the feature only works if you’re actively paying a subscription. So the actual choice in 2026 isn’t camera versus voice versus probe. It’s whether you own the smarts in your kitchen outright, or you’re just renting them from a company that can turn them off the second it stops making sense on a spreadsheet.

The post Weber Is Shutting Off the June Oven’s AI Camera, and a $90 Air Fryer Already Does The Same Thing first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Pixel 11’s Coolest New Feature Is Actually 10 Years Old

Posted on by

The Pixel 11 lineup arrived this week with a genuinely great redesign. The camera bar is 40 percent thinner, the glass runs edge to edge, and for the first time in a while a Pixel actually looks like it evolved instead of just got a new coat of paint. And then there’s HiLight, the one piece of new hardware Google actually wants you to talk about. A small LED cluster tucked into the corner of that same camera bar, ready to glow when Gemini is thinking or when someone you love is calling.

It is, in essence, Google finally admitting it missed the old Nexus notification LED and bringing it back. Five colors, a glow for Gemini, a glow for your favorite caller, and that’s the whole feature list on day one. Nothing to complain about here, except that Nothing exists. The London phone brand has spent years turning its own version of this idea into an actual playground, mini-games, custom widgets, an SDK anyone can build on. Google clearly has the engineering muscle to do something just as ambitious with HiLight down the line. It just chose not to, at least not yet.

Designer: Google

Before we get into that though, credit where it’s due. Hold a Pixel 11 next to a Pixel 10 and the difference is immediate, not the kind that only shows up in marketing photos. The bar sits almost flush now, and Google’s claim that it’s basically bumpless with a case on actually checks out in person. Under that glass, Tensor G6 lands on a 2nm node, Google’s first, promising 25 percent faster browsing, 15 percent quicker app launches, and on-device AI running up to 3.5 times faster while using less power. The Pixel 11 gets a new 48MP main sensor with 56 percent more light sensitivity and a telephoto stretching to 30x Super Zoom. This is a very complete phone before you even get to the Pro models.

The Pro and Pro XL push further with a 50MP main sensor, a redesigned 48MP telephoto, Portrait Mode at 5x, and 120x Pro Zoom, sitting under a 3,600-nit display that Google claims is twice as scratch resistant as last year’s. Titan M3 adds quantum-safe boot security on top. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold deserves its own mention here too. It shed almost 10 percent of its weight and a millimeter of thickness, down to 10.1mm closed, while Google claims triple the durability thanks to a redesigned gearless hinge. The crease is genuinely harder to spot than last year’s, and the whole thing folds flat enough to stop feeling like a novelty. If you told me a year ago Google would have the most convincing foldable in its own lineup, I would not have believed you.

Now, the part everyone will bring up regardless of how the rest of this goes: RAM. The Pro and Pro XL start at 12GB in their base 256GB configs, down from 16GB last year, and Google is blaming this on a supplier RAM shortage hitting the entire industry. Memory manufacturers have been shifting production capacity toward AI server chips, and consumer RAM and NAND prices have spiked hard enough this year that people are half-jokingly calling it RAMageddon. It is a real problem, and Google is far from the only phone maker feeling it. Storage doubling to 256GB as a base softens the blow a little, but a $100 price bump alongside a RAM cut is still a hard sell. Fair enough on the supply chain excuse. Less fair asking Pro buyers to pay more for less unless they climb a storage tier.

Back to HiLight, because it deserves the real estate. That LED cluster sits right where the temperature sensor used to live on older Pixels, which is a strange trade to make for something this limited. Google’s official pitch is that HiLight keeps you informed without the distraction of staring at a screen, which is a very polished way of saying there weren’t enough ideas to fill the space. Glowing when Gemini talks and flashing a color for favorite callers is a fine start, not an entire feature. Compare that to what’s happening across the pond. Nothing’s Glyph Matrix on the Phone (3) packs 489 individually lit LEDs into what functions as a tiny secondary screen, complete with an open SDK that lets anyone build their own widgets and games. People made a working ball maze. A tilt-controlled Magic 8 Ball. A contact dialer you can use without touching the main display. None of it is essential, but all of it is fun, and fun counts for something when you’re asking someone to pay a premium for a light.

Google clearly has the horsepower for something bigger here. Tensor G6 alone proves the company isn’t short on engineering muscle, and the camera bar redesign shows the industrial design team knows exactly what it’s doing right now. HiLight feels like the output of a team that had a great idea, then stopped one meeting short of making it good. I want to see where this goes in a year or two, because the foundation Google just built, the hardware, the placement, even the name, is genuinely solid. It just needs an actual reason to exist beyond telling you Gemini is thinking.

 

The post The Pixel 11’s Coolest New Feature Is Actually 10 Years Old first appeared on Yanko Design.

Google’s Pixel Tag is making the same ‘boring’ design mistake that Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi made

Posted on by

The Pixel Tag comes in exactly one color, a grey green called Fog, wrapped around stainless steel with a G logo stamped right on the front. It’s the same script Apple wrote with the AirTag and Samsung copied with the SmartTag2. A tracker spends its entire life clipped to your keys or your dog’s collar or tucked into a backpack pocket, which makes it one of the most personal objects you own. Google, of all companies, knows how to make hardware feel less like hardware. It just didn’t bother here.

Somebody at DJI figured out that a $60 microphone could come with snap-on decals, because apparently even a tiny accessory deserves a little personality. Motorola figured out something similar with the Moto Tag, which actually ships in sage green and a soft blue instead of the usual black or white default. So it’s not like nobody in tech has thought about this. It’s just that almost nobody applies it to trackers, and now Google has joined the long list of companies that had the chance and passed.

Designer: Google

The excuse I keep hearing, and I use that word deliberately, is durability. Metal survives drops, fabric doesn’t, case closed. Except my phone survives daily abuse inside a woven case, and so does yours, and so does every rugged Kevlar sleeve sold by the millions for devices far more fragile than a coin sized tracker. Nobody worries their phone case is going to disintegrate because it has some texture on it. A tracker being too delicate for color or grip is not a real constraint. It’s a decision that got dressed up as one.

Underneath that decision is genuinely solid engineering, for what it’s worth. The Pixel Tag measures 1.8 by 1.1 inches and just 5.4mm thick, which makes it noticeably slimmer than the AirTag’s 8mm body. It runs on a replaceable CR2032 battery rated for about a year, carries an IP67 rating for dust and water, and pairs instantly over Fast Pair with any Android 9 device or newer. The headline feature is Ultra Wideband combined with Bluetooth Channel Sounding, which gives you a literal on-screen arrow and distance reading instead of a vague “getting warmer” signal, though that trick needs Android 16 and Bluetooth 6.0 to actually work. It taps into Find Hub, Google’s network of over a billion Android phones, so a lost item can get spotted even when it is nowhere near your own devices. You can share access with up to ten people, ring it from a Pixel Watch, or ask Gemini through your Pixel Buds to ring it for you. All of that ships November 11 for $29, or $99 for a four pack.

Google already knows how to wrap good engineering in an object people actually want to look at, because it solved the exact same brief years ago with its speakers. The Nest Mini gets a soft, woven top because Google understood people don’t want to display a hunk of bare plastic on their kitchen counter. The Nest Audio does the same thing, fabric front, rounded edges, an object designed to belong in a room rather than announce itself as a gadget in one. That instinct exists inside the same company that just shipped a keychain accessory in one shade of grey with a logo dead center, like it needed to remind you it’s tech.

A tracker’s entire job is to sit quietly on the stuff you actually care about. It should feel like something you chose, not something you tolerated because the tech underneath happened to be good. Find Hub integration, UWB precision finding, a battery that lasts a year, all of that is genuinely solid work. But solid engineering wrapped in a logo stamped on steel isn’t a finished product. It’s half of one, and Google, weirdly, is the company with the least excuse for stopping there.

The post Google’s Pixel Tag is making the same ‘boring’ design mistake that Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi made first appeared on Yanko Design.

Sony Is Killing PlayStation Game Discs Exactly How Apple Killed the Headphone Jack

Posted on by

I got a serious case of déjà vu when Sony announced it was ending physical disc production in 2028. Reading their blog post about “shifting consumer preferences” and this being a “natural direction” felt a little too familiar, like I had seen this exact movie before. It was the same carefully polished language a company uses when it’s about to take away a feature you like, while insisting the decision is actually for your own good. You get the sense they are celebrating a future you never really asked for.

It took a minute to place the feeling, but then it hit me: the headphone jack. The script is identical, just with different actors. Apple told us removing a universal port was an act of “courage” that would push technology forward. Now, Sony is telling us that removing our ability to own, resell, or lend games is just an adaptation to “consumer trends.” In both cases, a simple, reliable, and open standard was sacrificed for a proprietary, walled-off ecosystem that benefits the company far more than the customer.

The ‘Courage’ to Make More Money

When Apple took the stage in 2016, they presented the removal of the headphone jack as a noble sacrifice for the sake of innovation. They needed more space, they said, for a better camera system, a bigger battery, and improved water resistance. While those claims had a kernel of truth, they cleverly obscured the much larger, more profitable truth. The real story, the one that made Apple billions of dollars, was the creation of a new, captive market. Suddenly, every headphone manufacturer had to pay Apple a licensing fee to use the Lightning port, or you, the customer, had to buy an adapter. Better yet, you could just buy their new, wonderfully convenient AirPods.

Sony is playing from the same sheet music, just in a different key. The company points to the very real trend of digital game sales outpacing physical ones as its justification. It’s true, more people are downloading games. But the business logic behind this move is far more calculated than simply following a trend. By eliminating discs, Sony wipes out the costs of manufacturing, packaging, and shipping games globally. More importantly, it lands a fatal blow on the used game market. Without discs, there is no GameStop, no eBay, no lending a copy to your cousin. Every single dollar spent on a new game must pass through the PlayStation Store, where Sony takes a cut, controls the price, and has absolute authority.

A Design That Trusts You Less

I’ve always believed that good product design builds a relationship of trust with the user. You buy a thing, and you expect it to serve your needs, not just the manufacturer’s. The PlayStation’s disc drive was a perfect example of that trust. It was a feature that gave you, the player, autonomy. It let you buy games from any retailer, hunt for deals, borrow from a friend, or sell a game when you were finished to fund your next purchase. It was a gateway to a world outside of Sony’s direct control, and that freedom was a core part of the product’s design. It was a humble component that respected your intelligence and your wallet.

This is what makes Sony’s decision feel like such a step backward. Removing the disc drive is a design choice that actively distrusts the user by removing their options. It funnels a global community of millions into a single, unmissable path that leads directly back to Sony’s pockets. The console transforms from a tool you own into a terminal for a service you rent. Apple did the exact same thing. The 3.5mm headphone jack was an open door, a universal standard that worked with everything from cheap earbuds to high-end studio monitors. The Lightning port and the proprietary chip in AirPods are guarded gates. Sony is simply building its own gate, and the price of admission is your freedom of choice.

Your Digital Library Is Rented. You Own Nothing.

The most significant consequence of this all-digital future is the redefinition of ownership itself. When you buy a game on a disc, you own a physical object. You have a legal right, under the “first-sale doctrine,” to do what you want with that object. You can sell it, lend it, or use it as a very expensive coaster. A company can’t reach into your home and take it back. A digital license, which is what you buy from the PlayStation Store, offers none of those protections. You are paying for permission to access data, and that permission can be revoked at any time, for any reason.

If that sounds like a paranoid exaggeration, just look at Sony’s own actions. A few weeks before this grand announcement about the future of gaming, the company began notifying users in Europe that it would be permanently deleting hundreds of purchased movies and TV shows from their digital libraries because a licensing deal had expired. Acclaimed films like Terminator 2 and Apocalypse Now, which people had paid for, were simply vanishing from their accounts. There were no refunds. This isn’t a hypothetical fear; it’s a demonstrated business practice. The all-digital, streamlined future Sony is so excited about is one where your game collection is not a collection at all. It’s a temporary service that exists entirely at their convenience.

The post Sony Is Killing PlayStation Game Discs Exactly How Apple Killed the Headphone Jack first appeared on Yanko Design.

Samsung and Google Are Trying Smart Glasses Again, at the Worst Possible Time

Posted on by

“Glasshole” entered Urban Dictionary as word of the day in March 2013, which tells you roughly how long it took society to make up its mind about face-mounted cameras. Google Glass had barely reached early users when bars, restaurants, and theaters started banning it. The device died from a social verdict so decisive it became a punchline. A decade later, Google is back. At Samsung’s Galaxy Unpacked in London today, the company helped reveal a new generation of AI-powered smart glasses, co-engineered with Samsung, dressed up in Warby Parker frames, and powered by Gemini. Same idea. Different fonts.

The climate into which these glasses arrive is not quiet. Meta spent the better part of 2026 trying to convince the public that AI glasses are aspirational, recruiting Kylie Jenner for the Meta Starfire Kylie Edition at $399 and positioning it as a style statement. What followed was a wave of coverage about covert recordings, a social media tutorial on disabling the LED light meant to prevent covert recording, and a protest campaign near Meta’s headquarters branding the glasses “fascist.” Some owners are reportedly now reluctant to wear them in public, having learned that the street name for their $399 fashion statement is “pervert glasses.” Google could not have picked a stranger moment to try again.

Designers: Samsung, Google, Warby Parker, and Gentle Monster

So what exactly did Samsung and Google show up with today? The glasses, branded Intelligent Eyewear, come in two designs: a slim black frame from Gentle Monster with a refined, fashion-forward silhouette, and a rich brown Warby Parker edition with a subtly upswept brow line meant for everyday wear. Under the hood, the Snapdragon AR1 Gen 1 chip handles the processing, the same silicon inside Ray-Ban Meta’s glasses, which is either reassuring or ironic depending on your mood. Gemini runs as the AI assistant on Android XR, the platform Samsung and Google co-developed, delivering information spoken into your ear rather than displayed on a screen. Battery life sits at nine hours, with a charging case that carries up to seven additional full charges. There is a built-in camera. There is always a built-in camera.

The positioning is reasonably clever and deliberate. By going audio-first with no display, Samsung sidesteps the cyborg-visor aesthetic that made Google Glass so alienating, and by partnering with Gentle Monster and Warby Parker, two brands with genuine fashion credibility, they are betting that good frames can do what celebrity endorsements and $400 price tags couldn’t for Meta. The glasses also pair with both Android and iOS, which removes the ecosystem friction that would otherwise halve the addressable market before a single unit ships. On paper, this is the most considered entry into smart glasses anyone has made.

The paper, unfortunately, has to reconcile with the sh*tstorm that is Meta and Kylie’s brand collab. Kylie Jenner’s job in the Meta Starfire campaign was to make AI glasses feel safe and aspirational, particularly for women. She wore them, posed with them, starred in content shot from the glasses’ own point of view. What nobody at Meta apparently modeled was the possibility that Jenner’s involvement would become the story, and the story would be unflattering. Lorde publicly called the glasses “not sexy.” Women across Brussels and beyond reported being filmed without consent by men wearing the exact product Jenner was paid to glamorize. Meta had to patch their own hardware to stop people from disabling the recording indicator light. The fact that a patch was required is its own headline.

Samsung and Google have built in visible recording indicators and user-controlled privacy settings, which they are smart to advertise loudly. But the problem Meta created for the entire category goes deeper than indicator lights. The public now has a fixed mental model of what a camera on someone’s face means, and it was not built by reading spec sheets. It was built by watching someone get filmed on the bus, by the NameTag story, by “pervert glasses” becoming the phrase that stuck when “Intelligent Eyewear” didn’t.

Google killed Glass in 2015 because society rejected the behaviour the device enabled before the technology even had a chance to mature. Everything Samsung unveiled today is genuinely more refined, more considered, and more fashionable than anything Glass ever was. The question is whether any of that is the actual problem. Going by recent evidence, the frames were never really the issue.

The post Samsung and Google Are Trying Smart Glasses Again, at the Worst Possible Time first appeared on Yanko Design.