This $30 Gadget Gives Claude a Face That Reacts to What It’s Doing

AI assistants have mostly lived inside screens, and that’s been fine, until you’re deep in a coding session and Claude is quietly running shell commands, editing files, and hitting tool after tool in the background. Knowing what’s happening without constantly alt-tabbing is harder than it should be, and approving or denying an action while keeping your hands on the keyboard is even harder.

That’s the gap Claude Desktop Buddy was built to fill. Released as an open-source project by Anthropic in April 2026 and built as a prototype by OpenELAB, it turns a small ESP32-based device into a physical companion that sits on your desk and mirrors the activity of the Claude desktop app over Bluetooth Low Energy. It wakes when a Claude Code session starts, idles quietly while Claude works, and gets visibly impatient when a permission prompt is waiting for your attention.

Designer: Anthropic, OpenELAB

The reference hardware is the M5StickC Plus, a pocket-sized board with a 135×240 color display, buttons, a built-in IMU, and a LiPo battery. It costs around $30 and comes pre-supported by the firmware. When Claude Code asks to run a shell command or access a sensitive file, the device lights its screen, buzzes, and shows the prompt. Button A approves. Button B denies. No switching windows, no hunting for the right modal.

Beyond the permission workflow, the device also doubles as a passive status indicator. A full vocabulary of animated states, including idle, busy, attention, celebrate, dizzy, and heart, plays out on the small screen depending on what Claude is doing. Shake the device to make it dizzy, flip it face-down to put it in nap mode, and it’ll power off the screen after 30 seconds to preserve battery. The built-in IMU handles all of this through physical gestures.

Transcript scrollback is another feature that makes more sense once you’ve used it. Rather than breaking focus to check what Claude just said, you can scroll recent messages directly on the device’s display. It keeps the primary workflow uninterrupted in a way that alt-tabbing simply doesn’t. The device pairs once and reconnects automatically whenever both sides are awake, so there’s no daily setup ritual.

Character customization adds a layer of personality that feels unexpectedly considered for what is, technically, a developer tool. You can drag a custom GIF character pack directly onto the Hardware Buddy window, and the device switches to the new character live. The default character, a small frog called Bufo, ships with the firmware.

There’s something genuinely different about having a physical object on your desk that reacts to an AI working in the background. It turns an invisible process into something with a face, a mood, and a pair of buttons that put control back in your hands without disrupting what you were doing.

The post This $30 Gadget Gives Claude a Face That Reacts to What It’s Doing first appeared on Yanko Design.

Google just announced a laptop with the worst possible name… and it’s filled with AI

Google just announced Googlebook. Not to be confused with Google Books, which is a separate Google service (even though if you search for Googlebook in Google, it autocorrects you to Google Books instead). This might just be the most frustratingly flawed naming strategy Google’s ever employed, especially after the company’s already had Chromebooks and Pixelbooks under their portfolio. It’s like Google launching a smart photo frame and calling it Googlephotos. Not the wisest idea, but once you look past the name, the laptop itself starts shaping up to raise even more questions.

Think of a laptop, but it’s just entirely AI. You know how most lower-end phones are filled with bloatware? Imagine if that bloatware was just AI everything. The OS has Gemini baked in, heck, even the cursor has AI injected into it like botox. It just feels puzzling considering not one single person I know has ever looked at a Windows laptop and gone – I need more of that CoPilot. Google somehow decided to double down on the AI aspect of the laptop experience, and I’m about to coin a word that I’d like the world to acknowledge henceforth. Google’s Googlebook might just be the world’s first ‘Sloptop’.

Designer: Google

A Sloptop (combining the words Slop and Laptop) is a laptop where the selling point has nothing to do with the laptop. The hardware becomes secondary to whatever AI layer has been plastered over it, and the entire pitch is essentially “trust us, the AI makes it better.” Google describes Googlebook as laptops built with Gemini’s helpfulness at their core, designed to work seamlessly with your devices and powered by premium hardware. Premium hardware listed last, by the way. The star of the show is the Magic Pointer, a feature built with the Google DeepMind team that brings Gemini right to your cursor, offering contextual suggestions every time you point at something on your screen. You wiggle your mouse and Gemini wakes up. Which sounds exciting until you realize your Android phone has been doing exactly this for years. Google Lens already analyzes whatever is on your screen. Gemini is already in your notification bar. The Magic Pointer is functionally Google Lens wearing a blazer and billing itself as revolutionary. The jump from your phone to your laptop desktop does not constitute a new feature, it constitutes a port. Not to mention how annoyed most people will probably be while gaming or generally browsing the internet when they accidentally wiggle their cursors to only be interrupted by Gemini. If you own a mouse-jiggler for dodging workplace productivity rules, the Googlebook might just end up being your worst enemy.

The redundancy runs deeper than just the cursor. Googlebook’s Quick Access lets you view, search, or insert your phone’s files on your laptop with no transfers needed, and you can tap a phone app directly on your laptop screen without ever leaving your workflow. Android mirroring is genuinely useful, and that part of the pitch makes sense. But Google is leading with Gemini widgets, AI-generated desktops, and a cursor that thinks for you, and all of that is already sitting in your pocket. The honest question is: if your phone handles all of this already, what problem is the Googlebook actually solving? A quick observation worth making here too, particularly for parents shopping back-to-school hardware: Google is essentially marketing a laptop that will summarize, suggest, write, and generate on demand. That’s a complicated value proposition when your kid has a history essay due Monday.

Meanwhile, the $599 MacBook Neo continues to have Windows laptop makers falling over themselves trying to build a competitor that matches its price and build quality. People are not lining up for the Neo because Apple Intelligence rewrites their emails. They’re buying it because it is a beautiful, fast, well-built machine at a price point that feels almost unfair. The lesson sitting right there on the table, waiting to be learned, is that consumers want great hardware first. The AI can come along for the ride, but it cannot be the destination.

Google seems to have missed that memo entirely, which brings up the uncomfortable question of whether Googlebook is a laptop at all, or a Gemini distribution strategy with a keyboard attached. Google hasn’t even confirmed what operating system Googlebooks actually run, though the company describes it as a modern OS designed for Intelligence that combines Android and ChromeOS. That vagueness is telling. The Pixelbook was quietly killed off. Chromebooks spent years in an identity crisis, perpetually caught between being a real laptop and a browser window with hinges. Google has a well-documented pattern of entering the laptop space with genuine ambition and then quietly losing interest, and nothing about the Googlebook announcement suggests that pattern is breaking.

And then there’s the name. After everything above, the name somehow still deserves its own moment. Google is working with Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, and Lenovo on the first Googlebooks, which means this name is going on products from some of the most established hardware brands in the industry. Executives at those companies approved the word “Googlebook” on their machines. That’s a thing that happened. The Chromebook, for all its limitations, had a clean and descriptive name. The Pixelbook sounded premium. Googlebook sounds like what a five-year-old would name a laptop if you told them Google made it. However, I want to be proved wrong. Desperately. Google’s had such a stronghold over the Android space that it really did seem like Chromebooks would be their next magnum opus. I guess we’ll have to wait till Google I/O to get more information on this new endeavor – and hope it doesn’t hit the graveyard too soon like its predecessors.

The post Google just announced a laptop with the worst possible name… and it’s filled with AI first appeared on Yanko Design.

BEYOND Expo 2026: Asia’s Biggest Tech Event Just Told the World That AI Software Was Only the Warm-Up

Every major tech conference eventually finds its thesis statement. CES landed on “everything is connected.” SXSW staked out culture-meets-technology. BEYOND Expo‘s thesis for 2026 is more specific, and honestly more timely: AI has spent years proving itself in software, and the interesting question now is what happens when it leaves the screen. The official theme, “AI: Digital to Physical,” takes over from last year’s theme of Transforming Uncertainty into a Trigger for Innovation. Timed perfectly around the global speculation that AI’s a bubble, it’s a genuine reflection of where the most consequential AI work is actually happening right now, in robotics labs, automotive platforms, wearables, and manufacturing floors across the Greater Bay Area.

BEYOND has been building toward this moment since Dr. Lu Gang launched it during a global lockdown in 2021, a decision he’s called delusional in hindsight during an interview with Yanko Design, but with the kind of grin that says he’d do it again. The original problem he was solving was simpler than people realize: Asia’s most interesting founders kept showing up at CES and Web Summit as attendees rather than headliners. A hardware startup out of Shenzhen with genuinely world-class AI chops would get a 3×3 booth on a back wall while the stage went to the usual suspects. BEYOND was built to fix that imbalance, and five years in, it’s working.

Click Here to know more about the BEYOND Expo 2026

The 2026 edition is aiming for 30,000 attendees, a significant jump from 2024’s 20,000, and the programming reflects a maturing event that knows its own strengths. The summit lineup spans Humanoid Robotics and Embodied AI, Enterprise Agentic Workflows, Autonomous Driving, AI-Integrated Wearables, and a PayFi and Decentralized AI track that will either feel prescient or premature depending on your priors. What ties all of it together is the through-line of AI becoming something you interact with physically, not just through a chat interface. That’s a meaningful editorial choice, and one that puts BEYOND in a different conversation than conferences still treating large language models as the whole story.

The most interesting addition this year is the GBA Innovation Tour, which gives international attendees direct access to Greater Bay Area manufacturing infrastructure. This matters more than it might sound. Lu Gang has argued for years that what makes Asia’s tech ecosystem genuinely different isn’t just the innovation pipeline, it’s the compression of the distance between idea and physical product. Watching an AI concept move from prototype to production in a Shenzhen facility in weeks rather than months is something you can describe in a keynote, but apparently you need to see it to really understand the scale and speed involved. The tour is BEYOND’s way of making that argument visceral rather than theoretical.

Last year’s theme, “Unveiling Possibilities,” was about reframing uncertainty as creative fuel, which was the right message for a chaotic moment. “AI: Digital to Physical” is more declarative, more confident. It names a specific transition that the industry is mid-stride through, and plants BEYOND squarely in the middle of it. Registration and exhibition details are live at beyondexpo.com.

Click Here to know more about the BEYOND Expo 2026

The post BEYOND Expo 2026: Asia’s Biggest Tech Event Just Told the World That AI Software Was Only the Warm-Up first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Roomba Guy Just Built a Robot Pet You Might Actually Love

If you’ve ever watched your Roomba bump helplessly into a chair leg for the third time and thought, “I deserve better from my robots,” you’re not alone. And apparently, neither did Colin Angle. The co-founder of iRobot, the man who essentially put a hockey puck-shaped vacuum in millions of homes, left the company in 2024 with a new question rattling around in his head: what if a robot could actually feel like it cares about you? The answer is the Familiar, the first prototype from his new startup, Familiar Machines & Magic. And it is not your average robot.

Picture a creature somewhere between a soft-eared dog and a round, slightly abstract bear. It has four legs, huge paws, and doe eyes that make it immediately charming in a way that no Roomba ever attempted to be. It’s furry, expressive, and was designed with the help of former Disney Imagineers, which explains why it looks like it belongs in an animated feature rather than a tech showcase. The Familiar has 23 degrees of freedom, meaning it can wiggle its ears, tilt its head, and wag a small nub of a tail with the kind of fluidity that feels less mechanical and more… alive. Its coat is touch-sensitive, built specifically to encourage physical interaction between you and it.

Designer: Familiar Machines & Magic

It also doesn’t talk. That detail feels deliberate and, to me, very smart. Voice assistants have trained us to think of robots as tools we command. The Familiar is going for something completely different. It’s designed to read your tone of voice, your body language, your overall energy, and respond accordingly. Angle calls it “Consumer Physical AI,” and while the label sounds like something off a product white paper, the idea behind it is genuinely compelling.

The name itself is worth noting. A “familiar” in folklore refers to the supernatural animal companion of a witch or magical figure, a creature bonded to a person not through ownership but through genuine connection. Angle’s team chose that name deliberately, and I think it sets the tone for what they’re trying to build. The goal isn’t to sell you a novelty gadget. It’s to create a new kind of relationship between humans and machines, one built on trust, attentiveness, and something approaching care.

Now, I’ll be upfront: I have feelings about this. Part of me finds it genuinely beautiful as a design concept. The Familiar was clearly approached the way good industrial design should be, with deep thought about how an object makes you feel, not just what it does. The choice to make it animal-like rather than humanoid is interesting, too. There’s far less of the uncanny valley unease that tends to follow humanoid robots around, and more of the universal warmth that most people already extend toward animals.

But another part of me wonders about the emotional stakes here. We’re already watching people form attachments to AI chatbots. A touch-sensitive, furry, expressive robot that mirrors your emotional state is a much more potent version of that. Angle has said he wants it to feel like the machine actually cares about him. That’s a lovely vision. It’s also a design brief that puts enormous responsibility on the creators to get it right, because the flip side of emotional bonding is emotional dependence.

Still, I’d be lying if I said the Familiar didn’t make me curious in the best possible way. The prototype images are almost disarmingly sweet. It looks like something you’d want sitting on the couch next to you while you read, or settled quietly in the corner while you work. If any robot was ever designed to move through your life rather than just function within it, this might be it.

The Familiar is still in the prototype stage, with no confirmed price or release date. But as debut concepts go, it’s a strong one. Whether or not it ever makes it into our homes, it raises questions about what we actually want from the machines we live with. And those questions feel well overdue.

The post The Roomba Guy Just Built a Robot Pet You Might Actually Love first appeared on Yanko Design.

AI-powered earbuds with built-in camera expand your capabilities in the real world

Headphones and earbuds have, over the last couple of years, become staples of this fast-paced world for good reason. The little audio gear essentials can do a multitude of tasks with just the push of a tactile button or pinch gesture. They can trigger smart assistant support for a smarter you, and if this concept were to be imagined, they can give you a pair of smart eyes, too.

The idea of a pair of earbuds with integrated cameras is not new, as Emil Lukas imagined, and now another concept reinforces the merit in having a pair of lenses on earbuds. Dubbed Lightwear, the earbuds look something straight out of a sci-fi flick, but underneath, they are a pair of smart assistant earphones that enhance your environmental perception in real time.

Designer: Suosi Design

Touted as the world’s first AI-powered earphones, Lightwear comes with a set of HD camera lenses to expand the sense perception as a vision module to interpret the surroundings and deliver the desired result. One can detail them via voice command about any information required in real time, and the buds respond with a detailed set of instructions or navigation guidance. Having gesture control support, the buds can control the connected home devices remotely using just gesture commands. All the data fed into the smart data system is end-to-end encrypted and stored locally. For enhanced privacy and protection, the sensitive data is automatically cleared on a scheduled cycle.

Compared to Emil’s version, these earbuds have a very downplayed camera presence, which I prefer. They look and feel just like any normal earbud, but have a function that makes them stand out from most pairs of earbuds that have the predictable features. Unlike other AI-powered earbuds, these stand true to their name as they come with the added visual apparatus to put forth better results. The use of AI functions is not limited to the earbuds, since the charging case does the same. This removes the use-case scenario to just when the earbuds are being worn. Loaded with highly sensitive microphones, the AI features can be triggered anytime the user wants. Privacy is also taken care of, as the user can opt to activate the fingerprint unlock module to prevent any unauthorized use.

These have an over-the-ear design, reminiscent of the way IEMs sit flush on the ears. The battery resides in those lobes, and although the designers don’t specifically talk about the usage time, these should last longer than TWS earbuds. Nor is there a specific word about the sound quality, ANC levels, or the app features. But then it’s just a concept centred on the form factor and usability.

The post AI-powered earbuds with built-in camera expand your capabilities in the real world first appeared on Yanko Design.

This 130cm Robot Just Took Buddhist Vows at a Seoul Temple

There has been a lot of discussion lately about how Artificial Intelligence can affect all kinds of religion. From using ChatGPT to create sermons to having an AI give spiritual guidance (with one even pretending to be Jesus), there are a lot of gray areas that are open to debate and discussion by different sectors. But how would you feel if an AI robot actually joined your congregation?

South Korean monks at Jogyesa Temple in Seoul are facing that situation now as they ordained Gabi, the country’s first robot monk. Dressed in traditional grey-and-brown Buddhist robes, it joined the Jogye Order of Korean Buddhism as part of the celebrations ahead of Buddha’s birthday later this May. South Korea joins its neighbor Japan, which previously had its own AI monk, Buddharoid, join a Kyoto temple, a sign that the intersection of faith and technology is becoming a growing trend across Asia, and that the question of AI’s role in religion is no longer purely theoretical.

Designer: Unitree Robotics

Gabi, whose name comes from a Korean term associated with compassion and mercy and is inspired by Siddhartha, stands 130 cm tall and is based on the Unitree G1 model developed by Chinese civilian robotics company Unitree Robotics. The G1 is a compact humanoid platform engineered with over 23 degrees of freedom, giving it a remarkably fluid range of motion. Built to replicate natural human movement, the robot can walk steadily, maintain balance, and perform deliberate, precise gestures with its articulated hands. It is also AI-powered, capable of processing and responding to verbal questions, which is exactly how it was able to respond to the senior monk during the ordination. It’s this combination of physical dexterity and responsive AI that made Gabi such a fitting presence at a Buddhist ceremony: its hands are capable of folding gracefully into the traditional prayer position, and its frame is nimble enough to perform a respectful bow, movements that carry deep spiritual meaning in Buddhist practice.

During the ceremony on May 6, Gabi did exactly that, folding its metallic hands and bowing respectfully alongside the other monks. When a senior monk asked if it would devote itself to Buddhism, it answered, “Yes, I will devote myself.” The monks then placed a traditional 108-bead rosary around its neck. In a small but telling concession to its mechanical nature, Gabi received a symbolic sticker instead of undergoing the customary incense burn, a reminder that, despite its robes and vows, it is still very much a machine.

Not everyone, however, is moved by the spectacle. The ordination has sparked debate among religious scholars and the public alike, with many questioning whether a machine can genuinely hold spiritual vows or embody the core Buddhist ideals of mindfulness, compassion, and the pursuit of enlightenment. Can a robot truly understand suffering, the very foundation of Buddhist teaching, when it cannot feel it? Critics also raise concerns about the trivialization of sacred rituals, arguing that ordination should remain a deeply human and intentional act. On the other side of the debate, however, supporters see Gabi as a creative and modern bridge, one that could engage younger generations with ancient teachings and make spirituality more accessible in an increasingly technology-driven world.

Whether you see Gabi as a bold leap into the future or a step too far, one thing is certain: this is just the beginning. Three more “spiritual cyborgs” are already set to join it at the temple for Buddha’s birthday celebrations on May 24. As AI continues to weave itself into every corner of human life, including our most sacred spaces, the line between the spiritual and the synthetic grows thinner by the day. What does it mean for a machine to seek enlightenment, or to offer compassion, when it was never capable of suffering to begin with? Perhaps the real question isn’t whether a robot can be a monk, but what it reveals about us that we’re the ones doing the ordaining.

The post This 130cm Robot Just Took Buddhist Vows at a Seoul Temple first appeared on Yanko Design.

This 130cm Robot Just Took Buddhist Vows at a Seoul Temple

There has been a lot of discussion lately about how Artificial Intelligence can affect all kinds of religion. From using ChatGPT to create sermons to having an AI give spiritual guidance (with one even pretending to be Jesus), there are a lot of gray areas that are open to debate and discussion by different sectors. But how would you feel if an AI robot actually joined your congregation?

South Korean monks at Jogyesa Temple in Seoul are facing that situation now as they ordained Gabi, the country’s first robot monk. Dressed in traditional grey-and-brown Buddhist robes, it joined the Jogye Order of Korean Buddhism as part of the celebrations ahead of Buddha’s birthday later this May. South Korea joins its neighbor Japan, which previously had its own AI monk, Buddharoid, join a Kyoto temple, a sign that the intersection of faith and technology is becoming a growing trend across Asia, and that the question of AI’s role in religion is no longer purely theoretical.

Designer: Unitree Robotics

Gabi, whose name comes from a Korean term associated with compassion and mercy and is inspired by Siddhartha, stands 130 cm tall and is based on the Unitree G1 model developed by Chinese civilian robotics company Unitree Robotics. The G1 is a compact humanoid platform engineered with over 23 degrees of freedom, giving it a remarkably fluid range of motion. Built to replicate natural human movement, the robot can walk steadily, maintain balance, and perform deliberate, precise gestures with its articulated hands. It is also AI-powered, capable of processing and responding to verbal questions, which is exactly how it was able to respond to the senior monk during the ordination. It’s this combination of physical dexterity and responsive AI that made Gabi such a fitting presence at a Buddhist ceremony: its hands are capable of folding gracefully into the traditional prayer position, and its frame is nimble enough to perform a respectful bow, movements that carry deep spiritual meaning in Buddhist practice.

During the ceremony on May 6, Gabi did exactly that, folding its metallic hands and bowing respectfully alongside the other monks. When a senior monk asked if it would devote itself to Buddhism, it answered, “Yes, I will devote myself.” The monks then placed a traditional 108-bead rosary around its neck. In a small but telling concession to its mechanical nature, Gabi received a symbolic sticker instead of undergoing the customary incense burn, a reminder that, despite its robes and vows, it is still very much a machine.

Not everyone, however, is moved by the spectacle. The ordination has sparked debate among religious scholars and the public alike, with many questioning whether a machine can genuinely hold spiritual vows or embody the core Buddhist ideals of mindfulness, compassion, and the pursuit of enlightenment. Can a robot truly understand suffering, the very foundation of Buddhist teaching, when it cannot feel it? Critics also raise concerns about the trivialization of sacred rituals, arguing that ordination should remain a deeply human and intentional act. On the other side of the debate, however, supporters see Gabi as a creative and modern bridge, one that could engage younger generations with ancient teachings and make spirituality more accessible in an increasingly technology-driven world.

Whether you see Gabi as a bold leap into the future or a step too far, one thing is certain: this is just the beginning. Three more “spiritual cyborgs” are already set to join it at the temple for Buddha’s birthday celebrations on May 24. As AI continues to weave itself into every corner of human life, including our most sacred spaces, the line between the spiritual and the synthetic grows thinner by the day. What does it mean for a machine to seek enlightenment, or to offer compassion, when it was never capable of suffering to begin with? Perhaps the real question isn’t whether a robot can be a monk, but what it reveals about us that we’re the ones doing the ordaining.

The post This 130cm Robot Just Took Buddhist Vows at a Seoul Temple first appeared on Yanko Design.

Forget Smarter AI, This Robot Thinks Presence Is the Point

We keep building AI to do more. More answers, more speed, more certainty. Designer Mehrnaz Amouei looked at that trajectory and asked a fundamentally different question: what if we built AI to be more present instead? The result is POCO, a soft robotic companion that might be one of the most quietly radical design concepts to emerge in recent years. It doesn’t talk over you, doesn’t flood you with information, and it doesn’t pretend to know things it doesn’t know. POCO sits with you. Literally.

At its core, POCO is a soft, tactile object that pairs with a smartphone, which serves as its computational brain and face. A soft textile body wraps around the device, transforming rigid, glass-and-metal technology into something that moves, breathes, and gestures in response to your presence. Together, they create something that sits somewhere between object, creature, and companion, and that deliberate ambiguity is very much intentional. You’re not quite sure what to call it, and that’s entirely the point.

Designer: Mehrnaz Amouei

Amouei developed POCO through research at the University of Illinois at Chicago, grounding the project in studies on loneliness and trust. Her findings indicated that people don’t actually want AI that projects certainty or control. They want availability and responsiveness. They want something that shows up without taking over. From those findings came the concept of “constructive interdependence,” a design philosophy where POCO’s limitations aren’t bugs to be patched but features embedded directly into the interaction model itself. The robot communicates what it can and cannot do through its behavior and physical states, which is a level of honesty you don’t often get from technology that typically overpromises and underdelivers.

I think that matters more than it might initially seem. The dominant conversation around AI right now is almost entirely about expansion: more capability, more integration, more autonomy. POCO pushes back on that without being preachy about it. It reframes the question of what good AI design actually looks like, and the answer it offers isn’t “smarter,” it’s “more trustworthy.” That is a genuinely different value system, and it feels overdue.

The sustainability dimension is also worth paying attention to. Rather than introducing new hardware and generating more electronic waste, POCO repurposes a device most people already own. That decision isn’t just a nice bonus; it’s built into the concept from the start, aligning with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals around mental well-being and responsible consumption. In product design terms, that means the project was developed with a broader cultural and environmental context in mind, not just a user persona sitting in a lab.

Physically, POCO responds to touch, movement, and environmental cues. It adapts to a user’s preferences while maintaining a consistent identity, which is a surprisingly nuanced balance to strike in any product, let alone one sitting at the intersection of soft robotics and emotional design. Because interaction happens through touch rather than voice commands or screen taps, there’s an intentional slowing down embedded in the experience. You can’t rush a tactile exchange the same way you can type faster or speak louder. That shift from speed to presence feels like a meaningful counter-proposal to how most tech is currently designed. We’ve grown so accustomed to interfaces that demand our attention that a device asking only for our company reads almost as radical.

POCO has already earned an Honorable Mention from the International Design Awards and drawn coverage from major design publications. Whether it ever moves into consumer production remains an open question. But as a design statement, it’s doing exactly what the best concept work should: prompting us to reconsider what we actually want from the technology we live with, and whether expanding capability was ever really the right goal. Maybe the most interesting AI isn’t the one that knows the most. Maybe it’s the one that knows when to just stay close.

The post Forget Smarter AI, This Robot Thinks Presence Is the Point first appeared on Yanko Design.

Three Buttons, Infinite Functions: Inside the Agentic AI Keypad That Adapts To Your Workflow

Here’s what happens when you join a Zoom call right now: you click the link, wait for the app to launch, find the mute button, realize your camera is on when you’re still in pajamas, hunt for that toggle, then minimize the window to keep working. Six actions, multiple windows, all muscle memory you’ve built up because this is just how it works. We’ve accepted the friction.

Project Mirage looked at that friction and built Dune. Three physical keys that sync with your calendar, know when your next meeting is, and give you one-button join, instant mic control, camera toggle that brings the window forward when you need it. Then you switch to your code editor and those same three buttons become the shortcuts you actually use in that tool. Open your browser, they adapt to the tab. The hardware reads context, talks to AI, morphs based on what you’re doing. It’s 50 grams of machined aluminum that finally acts like it knows what year it is.

Designer: Project Mirage

The core idea is simple but meaningful. Dune monitors your Mac, detects which application is in the foreground, and automatically reconfigures what its three keys do. In GitHub, they handle pull requests and code reviews. In VS Code or Claude, they surface the commands you reach for constantly. The device integrates with Openclaw to trigger AI agents you’ve already built, so that email sorting routine you automated can fire with a physical button press instead of hunting through menus. In Photoshop, you can map them to copy/duplicate layers, increase or decrease brush sizes, or flatten/export images. The best part, however, is using the Dune on your browser, where the hardware detects which tab you’re on, changing controls/maps based on whether you’re on a Gmail tab, a Google Meet tab, an Instagram tab, or even scrolling through your inspiration on Pinterest. The on-screen display shows you what each key does at any moment, removing the need to memorize complex shortcuts or maintain mental maps of what Button 2 does in seventeen different apps.

What separates Dune from traditional macro pads is that layer of intelligence. Stream Decks and programmable keypads give you power, but they demand upfront investment. You configure profiles for every app, remember which layer you’re on, maintain the whole system yourself. Dune comes preconfigured with workflows for common tools and adapts automatically. You can still write custom scripts, assign URLs, build your own automations (I built mine using AI and they work like a charm). The difference is the device does the heavy lifting of context switching for you.

The hardware itself is straightforward. CNC-machined anodized aluminum body, USB-C connection that powers the device directly without needing a battery, 40mm × 10mm × 10mm dimensions that sit comfortably next to your keyboard without dominating desk space. It’s macOS only for now, which makes sense given the tight system integration required to read active applications and browser tabs in real time. The packaging ships each unit embedded in actual river sand, a physical callback to the name and the metaphor of something that shifts and adapts constantly.

Dune is available for pre-order now at $119, with the price moving to $149 after launch. Ships in May 2026 from the Project Mirage website, where you can also find setup guides and documentation on building custom automations.

The post Three Buttons, Infinite Functions: Inside the Agentic AI Keypad That Adapts To Your Workflow first appeared on Yanko Design.

A Burned-Out Xiaomi Phone Now Runs Gemini AI Inside a Retro TV Case

The smart home speaker market has settled into a familiar aesthetic. Smooth cylinders, matte finishes, and understated designs meant to disappear into a room are the default for most voice assistants. It’s a reasonable approach, but it also means most of them look exactly the same, and the hardware driving them tends to get replaced every couple of years, whether it actually needs to be or not.

HANDMAX Workshop took a different approach entirely. Rather than buying new hardware, the build starts with a Xiaomi Mi 8 already well past its prime, complete with a burned-in display, degraded speakers, and a failing battery. The processor and software capabilities were still perfectly usable, though, and that turned out to be all this kind of project actually needs.

Designer: HANDMAX Workshop

The case is where things get interesting. Instead of a sleek enclosure meant to blend in, the HANDMAX design goes full retro television, with a front grille, physical control buttons, and decorative legs completing the picture. Carefully modeled 3D-printed parts handle the practical side of things, accommodating the phone’s sensors and camera while keeping the vintage illusion intact from every angle you look at it.

Put it on a desk, and you have a smart speaker that looks like something rescued from a garage sale, in the best possible way. Ask it a question, and Google Gemini handles the conversational side, pulling in responses without needing a dedicated microprocessor or a new development board. It’s the same AI model powering higher-end commercial devices, running on hardware that would otherwise be sitting in a drawer.

The smart home integration is what makes it genuinely useful beyond being a conversation piece. Through Google Home, the device can control smart home accessories directly, and custom routines let voice commands trigger specific actions around the house. Turning lights on, adjusting a thermostat, or running a sequence of automations becomes a spoken instruction directed at what looks like a miniature television set.

Getting there wasn’t entirely straightforward. The phone’s Bluetooth module had a habit of shutting itself down after 20 minutes of silence, which would quietly cripple the whole setup. The fix was characteristically clever, though; an inaudible 6 Hz tone runs constantly in the background, imperceptible to human ears but enough to convince the firmware that the system is still in use and shouldn’t shut down.

Beyond voice interaction, the finished device also functions as a wireless charger and a desktop display, which means it earns its counter space even when no one is talking to it. The final hardware list doesn’t include a single new component, just old parts that most people would have discarded without a second thought. That’s the more interesting design challenge of the two.

There’s an argument to be made that the best AI hardware isn’t always the most expensive, and this project makes it quietly. Commercial smart speakers are bought, used for a few years, and eventually replaced. A device built from broken hardware doesn’t follow that lifecycle, and the retro TV case that holds it together makes sure it doesn’t look like it’s trying to.

The post A Burned-Out Xiaomi Phone Now Runs Gemini AI Inside a Retro TV Case first appeared on Yanko Design.