Tag Archives: Reviews

ASUS Zenbook A16 (UX3607OA ) Review: Big screen, Surprisingly Light

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Exceptionally light for a 16-inch laptop

  • Beautiful 3K OLED display

  • Great battery life

  • Strong everyday performance

CONS:


  • Touchpad clicks feel firm

  • Only one color option

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The ASUS Zenbook A16 gets something surprisingly right. It makes a 16-inch laptop feel light, easy, and genuinely pleasant to carry, without losing the kind of performance most people actually need.

Big laptops usually ask for a compromise. You get the roomy screen, but you also get the extra weight, the larger footprint, and the feeling that you are carrying a little too much machine around every day. The ASUS Zenbook A16 UX3607 takes a different route, giving you a 16-inch canvas in a body that is startlingly light for the size, at around 1.3 kg, or 1.2 kg depending on the version.

What makes it stand out even more is that ASUS pairs that light build with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X2 Elite platform, which still feels relatively rare. The result is a slim, polished laptop that makes a larger display feel easy, casual, and genuinely portable, while still delivering strong everyday performance. With a 16-inch 3K 120 Hz OLED panel and Snapdragon X2 Elite hardware in the latest refresh, it is clearly built for people who want comfort, battery life, and speed in one very travel-friendly package.

Designer: ASUS

I spent about a month with the laptop, including three international trips. That gave me a good sense of how it felt not just at a desk, but in transit, in hotel rooms, and in the kind of everyday situations where a large laptop usually starts to feel less convenient. Over that time, the Zenbook A16 made a strong case for itself as a big-screen machine that does not ask you to live around it.

Aesthetics

The Zenbook A16 has a clean, minimal design, but it does not feel cold. That is an important distinction because a lot of slim laptops, especially larger ones, can come across as a little sterile. This one feels softer and more inviting, with a look that is polished without being severe.

A lot of that comes down to ASUS’ patented Ceraluminum finish. ASUS gives the chassis a surface that feels less harsh than typical metal, which helps the laptop look warmer and more tactile in person. It still feels premium, but in a more relaxed and approachable way.

The details are subtle, but they give the laptop some character. A silver ASUS Zenbook logo sits centered on the lid, adding just enough contrast without disturbing the clean look. Open it up, and the full-sized backlit keyboard in a darker greige finish brings a bit of depth to the interior, while the stylized “A” above the right side of the keyboard adds a small touch of personality.

The color helps too. The review unit I received came in Zabriskie Beige, which was the only color option for this variant. It suits the Zenbook A16 especially well, giving it a softer and more distinctive look than the usual sea of silver laptops.

Ergonomics

What I liked most about the Zenbook A16 was how easy it was to live with. On paper, the dimensions and weight are impressive for a 16-inch laptop at 35.35 × 24.24 × 1.65 cm and around 1.3 kg (2.87lbs), but what stayed with me more was the overall feel of using it. It never felt awkward or demanding, which is not something I can say about every large laptop.

The lid is a good example of that. I could open it easily with one hand, and the hinge felt smooth and well-balanced. It is a small thing, but details like that shape your impression of a laptop very quickly. In this case, it made the Zenbook A16 feel immediately more comfortable and better resolved.

I also really liked the texture of the chassis. The Ceraluminum finish has a smooth, pebble-like texture that feels warm and pleasant under the hands. It helps the Zenbook A16 stand apart from the colder, more clinical feel that metal laptops often have. That tactile quality gives the laptop a more relaxed and welcoming character in everyday use.

The keyboard was another highlight for me. The keys are very comfortable to type on, and that became more obvious the longer I used it. Whether I was writing, replying to emails, or working through longer stretches of text, it felt like a laptop that stayed out of the way in the best sense.

The touchpad is generously sized, which suits the scale of the laptop, but I did find that it needed a bit more force than I expected to click. It was not a major issue, and I got used to it, but it did stand out at first. On a laptop that otherwise feels so easy and light in use, that slightly firmer click felt a little less effortless than the rest of the experience.

This reads well already. If you want, I can do one very light polish pass to make it sound a touch more natural and less repetitive without changing your meaning. For example, I would probably trim phrases like “what stayed with me more” and “made a difference” just to make the rhythm feel a little cleaner.

Performance

The review unit I received is the ASUS Zenbook A16 UX3607 with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X2 Elite processor, paired with 48GB of RAM and 1TB of storage. That is a fairly premium configuration, and in everyday use, it felt quick, quiet, and consistently easy to rely on. It handled the usual multitasking of writing, research, email, an unruly number of browser tabs, streaming music, watching video, and light photo and video editing without ever feeling like it was running out of breath.

The Zenbook A16 (2026) runs Windows 11 and is part of the Copilot+ PC category. That places it firmly in Microsoft’s new AI PC push, though in daily use, the more noticeable benefit is still the machine’s general speed and efficiency. It feels modern and responsive in a very straightforward way, without constantly calling attention to the AI angle.

Although compatibility has clearly improved from Snapdragon X1 to X2, I still think it is something some buyers will worry about. Snapdragon X2 Elite gives the laptop much of its efficiency and responsiveness, but it also means this is still an ARM-based Windows machine. For general use, that was not a problem for me, but if your workflow depends on niche programs or you are into gaming, it is still worth checking that everything you need works properly before buying.

The display is one of the best parts of the Zenbook A16. The unit I tested comes with the touch-screen version of the 16-inch 3K OLED panel, and it gives the laptop a richness that you notice right away, whether you are working, streaming, or simply scrolling through photos. The 120 Hz refresh rate gives everything a welcome smoothness, while 500 nits of typical brightness, up to 1100 nits in HDR, 100% DCI-P3 coverage, and a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio help the screen look vivid, punchy, and properly premium.

Audio is another pleasant surprise. The six-speaker array sounds full and clear, and Dolby Atmos support helps give movies, music, and even casual video watching a little more scale and dimension. I also liked that MyASUS lets you switch between sound modes like Dynamic, Game, Movie, Music, and Voice, or create up to three custom Dolby Atmos equalizer settings, which makes it easier to tune the sound to whatever you are doing.

Battery life was also a strong point for me. I kept the laptop in balanced mode, and it easily lasted a full workday with eight hours or more of continuous use, which made it easy to trust when I was out and about. The included 130W charger is fast and still easy enough to carry, so the overall setup remained travel-friendly.

I also appreciated the port selection. ASUS includes two USB4 ports, a USB-A port, HDMI, a headphone jack, and an SD card slot, which makes the Zenbook A16 feel practical in a way many thin premium laptops no longer do. The SD card slot in particular is one of those small features that ends up being genuinely useful more often than you expect.

Sustainability

Sustainability is not the first thing the Zenbook A16 draws attention to, but it is part of the story. ASUS says its Ceraluminum material is made using pure water and electricity, without added organic compounds, strong acids, or heavy metals. That gives the finish a bit more substance than a purely cosmetic talking point.

There is also a more practical side to this. Battery replacements are doable, which is a plus, but the storage is not removable or serviceable. That makes the Zenbook A16 a somewhat mixed story on sustainability, with thoughtful material choices but limited repairability.

Value

The touch-screen version I tested is the Best Buy model, priced at $1,699.99. That puts the Zenbook A16 firmly in premium laptop territory, so it is not a machine that gets by on novelty alone. At this price, it needs to justify itself through the full experience, not just one or two standout specs.

I think it mostly does. You are getting a very light 16-inch laptop with a beautiful OLED display, strong battery life, a high-spec configuration, and a design that feels thoughtful in both look and feel. Still, $1,700 is enough money that buyers are right to think carefully about software compatibility and long-term flexibility before deciding it is the right fit.

Verdict

The Zenbook A16 ended up winning me over in a quiet way. It is not the kind of laptop that shouts for attention, but the longer I used it, the more I appreciated how thoughtfully it fits into everyday life. The light weight, the large and beautiful display, the warm feel of the Ceraluminum finish, and the overall ease of using it all added up to something that felt genuinely enjoyable.

What stayed with me most was how little friction there was to living with it. I liked being able to carry a 16-inch laptop without feeling weighed down, and I liked that it still felt polished and comfortable once I opened it up and got to work. The comfortable keyboard, strong battery life, good speakers, and practical port selection all helped make it feel like a machine designed by people who had actually thought about daily use.

It is not perfect, and I would still tell buyers to think carefully about software compatibility if they rely on niche programs or want a laptop for gaming. The firmer touchpad click also stood out on a machine that otherwise feels so easygoing. Even so, I came away with a lot of affection for the Zenbook A16, because it manages to feel both special and easy at the same time.

At $1,700, it is a serious purchase. But for someone who wants a premium laptop with a big OLED screen, long battery life, and a design that feels lighter and warmer than most, I think the Zenbook A16 makes a strong case for itself. It is one of those laptops that feels nicer the longer you live with it, and that may be its best quality.

The post ASUS Zenbook A16 (UX3607OA ) Review: Big screen, Surprisingly Light first appeared on Yanko Design.

Xiaomi Watch S5 46mm Review: Looking Good, Lasting Longer

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Stylish and premium design

  • Bright, vibrant display

  • Excellent battery life

CONS:


  • Limited app ecosystem compared with Wear OS

  • Sleep tracking can miss naps

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The Xiaomi Watch S5 46mm feels well judged. It is stylish, comfortable, and impressively long-lasting, even if the software still leaves some room to grow.

The Xiaomi Watch S5 46mm looks less like a gadget trying to pass as a watch and more like a watch that happens to be smart. That distinction matters because design still shapes how often a wearable actually ends up on your wrist. Xiaomi seems to understand that, and the Watch S5 leans hard into premium materials, a traditional silhouette, and a feature set built around daily usability.

Beyond the styling, there is a solid hardware pitch here, too. Xiaomi is promising a bright 1.48-inch AMOLED display, updated health tracking, new cycling features, and battery life of up to 21 days under light use. If those claims hold up, the Watch S5 could be appealing for people who want a smartwatch that feels less demanding and more natural to wear. I spent some time with the Watch S5 to see whether that mix of style and practicality actually comes through in daily use.

Designer: Xiaomi

Aesthetics

That design-first approach is obvious the moment you see the Watch S5. It sticks with a classic round shape, but the detailing keeps it from blending into the crowd. The slim bezel and minute markings make it feel closer to a proper wristwatch than a lot of smartwatches that still come off as generic or overly sporty. Combined with the forged stainless steel frame, the design has a solid sense of polish without trying too hard.

The lineup itself is well judged, too. The black and silver versions are the standard models, both using the stainless steel frame and a cleaner, more understated finish. The Ceramic Blue version is clearly the dressier option, with a zirconia ceramic bezel, enamel-filled markings, and a leather strap that gives it a more tailored look. The Jungle Green model I received takes a sportier approach, swapping in a forged carbon bezel and a hybrid strap that make it feel more rugged and outdoorsy. It is a smart spread of styles, and it gives the Watch S5 range more character than a simple color refresh would have.

Ergonomics

At 46mm, the Xiaomi Watch S5 is not a small watch, but it wears better than that number suggests. I used the Jungle Green version, and even on my small wrist, it never felt bulky or awkward. Xiaomi lists it at 46 x 46 x 10.99mm and 46g without the strap, so it is still very much a full-size smartwatch, but in day-to-day use, it comes across as lighter and easier to wear than I expected.

A lot of that comes down to how the watch sits on the wrist. It has enough presence to feel substantial, but it never feels clunky or uncomfortable. The hybrid strap on the green model helps, too, since it feels secure and practical for longer wear. That sense of ease carries over to the controls. The rotating crown and side button are both responsive, which makes the watch straightforward to use, though I would have liked slightly stronger haptic feedback from the crown.

Performance

A lot of the Watch S5’s appeal comes down to how easy it is to use, and the display does a lot of the heavy lifting there. It uses a 1.48-inch AMOLED panel with a 480 x 480 resolution and up to 2500 nits of peak brightness. The bezel is slimmer too. Xiaomi says it measures 2.6mm, which is 40 percent narrower than the previous generation, and that helps the screen feel more open and modern. In use, it looks sharp, vibrant, and bright enough to stay readable outdoors without much effort. That alone goes a long way on a smartwatch, since a dim screen can get annoying very quickly when you are checking the time or glancing at notifications on the move.

Fitness and health tracking are a big part of the Watch S5, even if I am not really the target user for the more training-heavy side of it. I am not someone who works out intensely or spends much time digging through performance metrics during exercise, which happens less often than I would like to admit. That is partly why I found the Watch S5 surprisingly approachable. It gives you some flexibility over what data shows up on the watch, so it does not have to feel like a wall of numbers every time you start moving.

Most of my time with it was spent on walks and a light hike rather than anything especially demanding, but I still found the tracking useful. Being able to glance down and see things like heart rate, distance, and workload made the experience feel a bit more engaging, especially during the hike when I was already feeling tired. I would not suddenly pretend this turned me into a training-focused person, but it did make the data feel more motivating than I expected.

The Watch S5 uses the same heart-rate sensor setup found in the flagship Xiaomi Watch 5, with 4 LEDs and 4 PD, alongside L1 plus L5 five-system GNSS and 5ATM water resistance. There are also more than 150 sports modes, so the watch clearly has a much broader fitness toolkit than the small slice of it I used. Sleep tracking is a bit more mixed. Xiaomi claims its updated sleep algorithms improve fall-asleep and wake-up detection by 11 percent, with sleep-stage tracking improved by 14 percent. In my use, though, it still had a tendency to miss naps. That does not make the feature useless, but it is a reminder that health tracking claims on paper do not always translate perfectly in everyday use.

Beyond health and fitness, the software experience is mostly straightforward, too. The Watch S5 runs Xiaomi HyperOS 3, and for the most part, it is easy enough to get around. The interface is straightforward, and it does not take long to figure out where everything is. Swiping down brings up notifications, though your options are fairly limited once you are there. You can dismiss them, but you cannot quickly reply to messages, which makes the experience feel a bit more passive than on some rival smartwatches.

The rest of the navigation is a little uneven. Swiping up opens widget cards, while swiping right lets you cycle through the watch faces stored on the device. Swiping left, though, does nothing at all. I found that a bit frustrating, especially since I do not change watch faces very often. It feels like Xiaomi could have made better use of the side gestures here, or at least given users the option to customize them.

Pressing the rotating crown opens the app list, while the side button brings up the control center. That all works as expected, but the software does feel more limited once you look beyond the basics. Since the Watch S5 does not run Wear OS, there is no access to the Google Play Store, and Xiaomi’s own app selection for HyperOS 3 is still quite limited. On the phone side, the Mi Fitness companion app covers the essentials and also gives you access to plenty of free watch faces, which is a nice way to add some variety even if the wider software ecosystem remains fairly basic.

Battery life may be the Watch S5’s most practical strength. Xiaomi rates it for up to 21 days of light use from the 815mAh battery, which it says is a 68 percent jump over the previous generation. In my case, with Always On Display turned on and all the health tracking features enabled, it lasted about six days. That is genuinely impressive, and it makes the Watch S5 feel far less needy than many smartwatches. Charging happens through the included proprietary magnetic pogo-pin charger, which works fine, though it does mean dealing with yet another device-specific cable.

Sustainability

Sustainability is not a major part of Xiaomi’s pitch for the Watch S5, though to be fair, that is true of most smartwatches. There is no clear emphasis here on recycled materials or repairability, so it is hard to give the watch much credit on environmental grounds alone. What it does offer, though, are a few practical touches that could help with longevity.

The 5ATM water resistance also helps on the longevity front, especially for a watch that is meant to handle swimming as well as everyday wear. The use of standard 22mm quick-release straps is another plus, since it makes the watch easier to refresh over time without being locked into one specific band. That may sound like a small thing, but replaceable straps can help a device stay in use longer, especially when comfort or style preferences change. The stainless steel frame and the more premium material options should also hold up well over time. For now, the Watch S5 feels built to last, even if it does not make much of a sustainability case.

Value

The Xiaomi Watch S5 makes a pretty strong case for itself on value. At £149.99, or about $205, for the black and silver versions, and £169.99, or roughly $232, for the Blue and Green models, it sits in a price range that feels competitive for what you are getting. The stainless steel frame, bright AMOLED display, strong battery life, and broad fitness feature set already give it a solid hardware foundation, and the more premium Blue and Green finishes do at least look like they justify the small step up in price.

That pricing also helps make some of the watch’s limitations easier to accept. The software is straightforward but not especially deep, and the app ecosystem is still quite limited compared with Wear OS alternatives. Even so, the Watch S5 is not really trying to compete as the most app-rich smartwatch in its class. It feels more like a well-rounded option for people who care about design, comfort, battery life, and fitness basics, and at these prices, that balance is easier to appreciate. For the money, Xiaomi is offering a lot of watches.

Verdict

The Xiaomi Watch S5 succeeds by focusing on the right things. It puts design, comfort, battery life, and the kind of fitness features that are useful without becoming overwhelming at the center of the experience. That makes it easy to recommend, especially for people who want something that looks more like a proper watch and less like a tiny gadget strapped to the wrist.

The trade-off is that Xiaomi HyperOS 3 still feels fairly limited once you look past the basics. You are not getting the depth or flexibility of a Wear OS device, and that will matter to some buyers. Even so, the Watch S5 gets enough right to stand out where it counts. At £149.99, or about $205, for the standard versions and £169.99, or roughly $232, for the Blue and Green models, it offers a lot without asking too much in return.

The post Xiaomi Watch S5 46mm Review: Looking Good, Lasting Longer first appeared on Yanko Design.

Wacom MovinkPad Pro 14 Review: The $900 Sketchbook Designers Needed

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Minimalist design streamlined for focused work on the go

  • Paper-like experience when drawing or writing

  • Comes with Wacom Pro Pen 3 in the box

  • Large, bright, color-accurate OLED screen with anti-reflective surface


CONS:


  • Quite a significant investment

  • Uncertain software update roadmap

  • Instant Pen Display Mode is currently offered as a beta feature

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The Wacom MovinkPad Pro 14 isn't another Android tablet. It's a sketchbook that happens to run one.
award-icon

For decades, Wacom has held an almost unchallenged grip on the drawing tablet and pen display market. Its products are so trusted that studios and design firms often keep them running for years, sometimes long after they’ve been discontinued. Lately, though, its rivals have been gaining a lot of attention, pushing increasingly attractive prices and expanding into new product categories.

That doesn’t mean Wacom has been idling. The company is finally wading into standalone Android tablet territory with the MovinkPad 11 and the more premium MovinkPad Pro 14, a proper portable drawing machine aimed squarely at working creatives. We’ve been spending time with the larger of the two, along with the new Wacom Art Pen 2, and the question is whether it’s worth every dollar of its price tag.

Designer: Wacom

Aesthetics

Right out of the box, the MovinkPad Pro 14 doesn’t dazzle the way other tablets in its price range tend to. There are no flashy colors, no ultra-thin borders, no polished surfaces. The bezels are noticeably wide, the default wallpaper is a solid, flat light gray, and the whole thing carries a stubbornly plain look that feels almost out of step with the competition.

It’s all very much by design. Wacom’s intent is to mimic the look and feel of a physical sketchbook, the kind artists, designers, and architects carry everywhere. The device comes in one color, light gray, which echoes the tone of most sketchbook paper. Its rectangular form, wide borders included, also closely mirrors the footprint of an A4 pad, binding and all.

The sides of the device carry that same restraint. One long edge holds the power button, volume rocker, and microSD slot, while the opposite edge features connectors for the optional cover accessory. The short edges house the speakers, and the bottom is reserved for branding, regulatory inscriptions, and four rubber feet. There’s nothing extraneous, nothing decorative, and nothing that distracts from the task you’re there to do.

The included Pro Pen 3 follows the same philosophy. It’s all black, slim, and cylindrical, with a body so uniform it almost looks like a high-end mechanical pencil. The three side buttons are barely raised, sitting nearly flush against the barrel for a cleaner look. Unscrewing the rear half reveals three replacement nibs tucked inside: a Carbon Shaft nib, a Felt nib, and a POM nib.

Wacom’s vision for the MovinkPad Pro 14 is to replicate the feeling of picking up a sketchbook, flipping to a fresh page, and getting straight to work. That intent comes through clearly because the tablet removes just about every visual, physical, and digital distraction it can. It doesn’t try to be the slickest-looking device in the room. It tries to be the one you reach for first.

Ergonomics

At 14 inches, the MovinkPad Pro 14 isn’t something you’d hold up one-handed for long, but at just 699 grams and 5.9mm thin, it slips easily into any bag. Resting it on your arm or lap doesn’t feel like a chore either. For creatives who move between locations throughout the day, that combination of size and lightness goes a long way toward making it a genuinely portable tool.

The four rubber feet on the underside keep the tablet from sliding around on a desk and slightly raise the back off the surface, which helps with airflow. There’s no built-in kickstand or angled stand, so if you prefer working at a tilt, you’ll need to source one separately, either from Wacom’s own accessory line or from a third-party option. It’s a small gap in an otherwise thoughtful package.

Those wide bezels, which might seem like a design quirk at first, actually earn their place here. They give you a comfortable inactive area to rest your palm or fingers when gripping the tablet from the sides, so your touch input doesn’t accidentally interfere with whatever you’re drawing. It’s the kind of practical thinking that tends to reveal itself only once you’re deep into a long session.

That said, the MovinkPad Pro 14’s footprint means it isn’t something you’d pull from a bag and start sketching on at a moment’s notice. For that kind of spontaneous work, the smaller MovinkPad 11 is probably the better fit. The Pro 14 is better suited to longer, more involved sessions away from the desk, as long as you’ve found a comfortable spot to settle in.

The Pro Pen 3 is well-balanced and comfortable enough in the hand, though your experience will vary depending on what you’re used to. Its slim, pencil-like build can lead to some cramping over long sessions for those accustomed to thicker tools. Official grips are available but aren’t cheap. The nearly-flushed buttons are also too easy to press accidentally. The Art Pen 2, which we’re also reviewing, offers a wider barrel as an alternative but is sold separately.

Performance

Under the hood, the MovinkPad Pro 14 runs on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, expandable via microSD up to 2TB. The processor isn’t the newest available, but it handles everything thrown at it with ease. Multitasking is smooth, app switching is fluid, and there’s no sense that the hardware is struggling to keep pace with anything.

The 14-inch OLED display runs at a 2880×1800 resolution with a 120Hz refresh rate, treated with anti-fingerprint, anti-reflective, and anti-glare textured glass. The wide rectangular aspect ratio works in favor of drawing apps that line their UI panels along the sides, something squarish iPad screens can’t accommodate as cleanly. The textured coating adds a satisfying scratchiness to each stroke, and pen accuracy is, naturally, exactly what you’d expect from Wacom.

There are no cameras on the MovinkPad Pro 14, front or back. That’s a deliberate choice. There’s no temptation to flip over to social media, no accidental video calls, nothing that pulls focus away from what you’re there to do. Passively watching a tutorial in a corner of the screen is about as off-task as it gets, which, honestly, isn’t a bad thing for anyone prone to distraction. Split-screen functionality makes it easy to have a reference off to the side while you work.

The software side is equally stripped down. Android 15 comes installed with zero bloatware and just three Wacom-made apps: Shelf for your gallery, Tips for settings, and Canvas, a quick sketching surface that wakes directly from sleep with a tap of the pen. It’s intentionally bare-bones for capturing fleeting ideas, though a few more brush options would genuinely be welcome. From Canvas, you can instantly send your sketch to an Android app, though it seems to be limited to Clip Studio Paint, iBisPaint, and Autodesk Sketchbook. Hoping it will offer some flexibility in the future.

Speaking of apps, desktop-grade drawing applications like Clip Studio Paint and Krita run without issue. The broader Android ecosystem opens up a decent range of options, though it’s worth remembering that anything exclusive to Windows or Mac won’t be available here. Customizing the pen buttons is also off the table, a limitation of the Android platform rather than any fault of the hardware itself.

The Instant Pen Display Mode is arguably the most intriguing feature here. It converts the tablet into a secondary display for a Windows or Mac computer, via USB or Wi-Fi, turning it into a portable, makeshift Cintiq. It’s part of Wacom Lab, an experimental creator community that lets users explore and provide feedback on new creative possibilities through beta features. As of this writing, the setup process involves quite a number of steps, and pen button support is currently limited to toggling a small side panel for common modifier keys. It definitely shows promise, so hopefully development will be quick.

Battery life is genuinely impressive. The 10,000mAh cell can sustain nearly five days on standby and supports 65W fast charging, though you’ll need to bring your own charger since none is included in the box. The USB-C port is only 2.0, so it doesn’t charge as quickly as the spec might suggest, but an hour or more of active drawing barely makes a dent in the battery.

Sustainability

Wacom doesn’t use recycled or notably sustainable materials in the MovinkPad Pro 14 itself, but the company does meet several other environmental benchmarks worth noting. Its packaging is compact, minimal, entirely plastic-free, and fully recyclable, while the device is built with the kind of durability Wacom products are known for, the sort that keeps them in active use long after most gadgets would have been binned.

That longevity argument holds well for Wacom’s drawing tablets and pen displays, which tend to outlast their useful lives many times over. A standalone Android tablet is a different matter, though. Apps like Clip Studio Paint have already dropped Android 12 support, making regular OS updates critical. Wacom has committed to keeping the MovinkPad Pro 14 current, but no clear update schedule or roadmap has been shared publicly yet.

Value

At $899.95, the MovinkPad Pro 14 isn’t an impulse buy, but it’s a reasonably grounded one. An equivalent iPad would require buying the Apple Pencil separately, while a comparable Samsung Galaxy Tab tends to run noticeably higher. For a tablet built specifically around the drawing experience, with Wacom’s pen technology at its core, the price lands in a range that’s genuinely difficult to argue against.

The large screen and capable hardware make it a compelling option for creatives who frequently work away from their desks. It doesn’t sacrifice quality for the sake of portability. With the right app installed, it functions as a capable mobile workstation wherever you happen to be. And when a PC or Mac app becomes unavoidable, Instant Pen Display Mode is there to bridge the gap.

There are caveats, of course. The beta status of Instant Pen Display Mode means it’s not quite ready to be a daily driver feature. You’ll also need to feel at home with Android’s drawing ecosystem for this workflow to really make sense. And the uncertainty around long-term Android updates is a concern that Wacom will need to address more concretely before most buyers can put it fully to rest.

Verdict

The MovinkPad Pro 14 isn’t Wacom’s first stab at a standalone portable device. Veterans will remember the Windows-based Cintiq Companions and the MobileStudio Pros. But this is by far the most portable and clearly focused version of that idea. It doesn’t try to cram Windows into a pen display. It’s a purpose-built mobile experience that happens to carry a Cintiq-like trick discreetly tucked away.

At the same time, it doesn’t operate like an Android tablet with a Wacom digitizer tacked on, which is essentially what Samsung’s Wacom-enabled slates are. Wacom has built something around a specific, coherent idea: a true digital sketchbook. Some software edges still need ironing out, but for artists and designers craving genuine creative freedom outside the studio, the MovinkPad Pro 14 offers something few tablets in its class can match.

The post Wacom MovinkPad Pro 14 Review: The $900 Sketchbook Designers Needed first appeared on Yanko Design.

Wacom Art Pen 2 Review: A Stylus That Finally Moves Like a Real Brush

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Ergonomic design with raised and angled buttons

  • 360-degree barrel rotation sensitivity

  • Iconic Wacom flared grip design

  • Accessible price point for a pro tool

CONS:


  • Limited compatibility with Wacom drawing tablets

  • No option for custom weight swapping


RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The Wacom Art Pen 2 proves that sometimes one feature is all it takes to make a tool feel irreplaceable.

Digital drawing has matured to a point where the pen you use often defines the kind of work you’re capable of. Most tablets ship with a capable stylus included, and pressure sensitivity has become nearly standard. Where real differences emerge is in the finer details: tilt support, button placement, barrel thickness, and the nuanced control that separates a general sketching tool from something more professional.

Wacom knows this territory well, having refined its pen technology across decades of products. The Art Pen 2 is its latest attempt to push that nuance even further, reviving a feature from its predecessor that dedicated artists genuinely missed: 360-degree barrel rotation. It’s an accessory designed not for everyone, but for those who want their digital brushes to behave as closely as possible to the real thing.

Designer: Wacom

Aesthetics

The Art Pen 2 carries Wacom’s iconic flared grip design, widening toward the tip and tapering toward the back. It gives the pen more visual character than a plain cylinder, while the two raised side buttons, set at a slight angle, add a bit of intentional texture to an otherwise clean barrel. The shape looks distinctly professional without being flashy, which suits the kind of serious work it’s built for.

Unscrew the back half, and a small nib compartment is tucked inside, keeping replacement tips within arm’s reach during a session. It’s a detail borrowed from the Pro Pen 3 and one that makes swapping nibs far less disruptive mid-drawing. The pen comes in an all-black finish, which keeps things clean and consistent, and makes the angled buttons stand out just enough to locate them quickly by sight.

Ergonomics

The pen is well-balanced and feels substantial in the hand without being heavy. The wider barrel suits anyone who finds slimmer pens like the Pro Pen 3 a bit uncomfortable during long sessions, though that’s always a personal call. The three raised, angled buttons make accidental presses nearly impossible and are effortless to identify by feel, which matters when your eyes are glued to the canvas.

The flared shape does come with a trade-off. It won’t sit easily in most pen loop accessories or grip covers, and there’s no way to slim it down if the barrel feels too wide. That’s the opposite situation from the Pro Pen 3, where an aftermarket grip can always bulk things up. The Art Pen 2’s shape is fixed, and you work with it or find something else.

Performance

Pressure sensitivity sits at 8,192 levels with full tilt support, putting it on par with the best pens at any price. Accuracy and response are exactly what you’d expect from Wacom, meaning there’s nothing to second-guess. What sets the Art Pen 2 apart, though, is the 360-degree barrel rotation, which picks up precisely how much and in which direction the pen shaft is turned.

For tools like calligraphy brushes or natural-media simulations, barrel rotation is genuinely transformative. It’s worth noting, though, that it’s also a fairly niche feature and not many drawing apps currently support it. Casual users probably won’t miss it at all. Where it resonates most is as an upgrade path for those who owned and relied on the original Art Pen before it was discontinued.

Compatibility is currently limited to a specific set of devices: the Wacom MovinkPad Pro 14, select Cintiq models (DTK168, DTK246, DTH246), and three Intuos Pro variants (PTK470, PTK670, and PTK870). Wacom has said that support for additional Pro Pen 3-enabled devices will be added over time, but for now, buyers should double-check their tablet is on the list before committing.

Sustainability

Like most professional accessories, the Art Pen 2 is plastic and metal, with nothing notably sustainable about the materials themselves. There’s no recycled content or eco-conscious material choice to speak of. Packaging tells a different story, though. It’s minimal, plastic-free, and fully recyclable, which aligns with what Wacom has been doing across its more recent product releases. A small step, but a consistent one.

What does count in the pen’s favor is Wacom’s track record for longevity. The original Art Pen was in production and active support for close to 16 years, an almost unheard-of lifespan for a digital accessory. If the Art Pen 2 follows a similar path, the investment stretches well beyond what most accessories can promise, and that kind of durability is its own quiet form of sustainability.

Value

The barrel rotation feature does limit the Art Pen 2’s broader appeal. Plenty of artists won’t need it, and for those users, there’s still a reasonable case for sticking with the more standard Pro Pen 3. If rotation has never factored into your workflow, the Art Pen 2’s most distinctive selling point simply won’t move the needle for you, and that’s worth being honest about.

That said, there’s a hidden value worth considering. At $99.95, the Art Pen 2 is $30 cheaper than the Pro Pen 3, with nearly identical core performance and barrel rotation on top. For those who prefer a thicker grip, it also sidesteps the added cost of official grip accessories. As a package, it makes considerably more financial sense than it first appears.

Verdict

The Wacom Art Pen 2 is a well-considered accessory for a specific type of creative. It doesn’t try to replace the Pro Pen 3, and it’s clearly not aimed at casual sketchers. What it offers is a combination of pro-level pressure sensitivity, a comfortable and distinctive grip, and a rotation feature that no competing pen at this price comes close to matching.

The limited compatibility list is a real constraint, and Wacom should address it sooner rather than later. But for those drawing on a supported device, particularly the MovinkPad Pro 14, the Art Pen 2 is a genuinely valuable add-on that earns its asking price without much argument. Especially at $99.95, it delivers a kind of brush-like expressiveness through barrel rotation that no standard pen, regardless of price, can replicate.

The post Wacom Art Pen 2 Review: A Stylus That Finally Moves Like a Real Brush first appeared on Yanko Design.

TCL PlayCube Review: One Twist Replaces Your Entire Projector Setup

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Fun, quirky, and stylish design

  • Create rotating solution to typical stands and mounts

  • Functional and tactile fabric exterior

  • 66Wh built-in battery for hours of use

  • Built-in Google TV with officially licensed Netflix needs no extra dongle

CONS:


  • A bit pricey

  • Single 5W speaker

  • 750W ISO lumens lamp requires a darker environment

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The TCL PlayCube isn't trying to be the brightest or the loudest, just the easiest to live with, and it pulls that off beautifully.

Portable projectors have gotten better on paper, but setting one up in an unplanned setting has stayed stubbornly complicated. Finding a surface at the right height, manually correcting the geometry, and discovering the angle is still off after all of that are steps that haven’t gone anywhere. The gap between what portability promises and what it delivers in practice is one of the more persistent frustrations in personal electronics.

The TCL PlayCube is built around that gap. Rather than adding features to a conventional projector body, it rethinks the form: a compact, nearly cubic unit where the upper half rotates to steer the projection without physically moving the whole device. A built-in 66Wh battery, Google TV, and officially licensed Netflix round out the package, making a case for portability that actually holds up outside of a product demo.

Designer: TCL

Aesthetics

Most portable projectors don’t have a recognizable silhouette, tending toward flat or cylindrical shapes distinguished mostly by logo and color. At 149.8mm x 96.6mm x 96.6mm, the PlayCube arrives with proportions that feel genuinely considered. The near-cubic geometry stands apart on a shelf or tabletop, and the rotating sections make the mechanism visually legible, so the form communicates what the product does before you even touch it.

Those sections are where the design does its most interesting work. Twisting it redirects the projection without moving the whole unit, making the device feel less like a sealed gadget and more like a tool with a clear physical interface. The visual logic is borrowed from the Rubik’s Cube, and the reference earns its place, signaling play, interaction, and adjustability in a product that actually delivers those qualities.

The exterior is wrapped in an outdoor waterproof speaker fabric that went through acoustic testing before landing on the finished product. The result is a surface considerably warmer and gentler than the matte plastic or rubberized textures typical in the category. It makes the PlayCube feel approachable in a way most tech products don’t manage, closer to a domestic object than a piece of AV equipment.

Choosing a textile exterior for a device that also functions as a speaker enclosure is a decision that works on multiple levels. The fabric repels environmental interference, blends into different settings without the harsh visual presence of a glossy casing, and gives the surface a softness that makes handling feel natural. On a nightstand, a coffee table, or an outdoor spread, the PlayCube’s material finish doesn’t announce itself as electronics.

Ergonomics

At 1.3kg, the PlayCube is light enough to move between rooms without planning for it, and the cube-like shape stows more cleanly in a bag than the elongated designs common in the category. The built-in 66Wh battery delivers up to three hours of playtime, enough for a full movie, and USB-C charging means a portable power bank can extend that window considerably when an outlet isn’t available.

Aim the PlayCube toward a bedside ceiling, and you’d normally need mounting hardware or a creative stack of books to hold the right angle. Here, a simple twist of the upper half handles the redirection, making ceiling projection something you’d attempt on a whim rather than plan for in advance. The rotating design earns its place in the ergonomics story as firmly as it does in the aesthetic one.

Connectivity is thorough for the size. An HDMI input, USB 2.0 port, and 3.5mm audio output cover the physical side, all of them located on the back for a single point of access. Bluetooth 5.1 and WiFi 5.0 handle the wireless stack, and the Bluetooth connection makes pairing an external speaker effortless whenever the built-in driver isn’t quite enough for a given setting. A standard tripod thread at the base opens up more formal placement options.

The included remote is compact and covers quick-access buttons for the most commonly used streaming services. Google TV’s interface will feel immediately familiar to anyone who has used a recent Android TV device, removing most of the learning curve upfront. Its broad app ecosystem reduces the need for workarounds or sideloaded content, an advantage most apparent when the PlayCube is set up somewhere without a dedicated media arrangement in place.

Performance

The PlayCube’s imaging uses a 0.33-inch DMD DLP display engine rated at 750 ISO lumens. That ISO designation carries weight because ISO lumens are measured under standardized conditions, unlike the inflated figures common on cheaper portables. In dimmed rooms or outdoor evening settings, 750 ISO lumens holds up well, keeping the image from looking washed out in the conditions this projector is actually built for.

Resolution sits at 1920×1080, holding up across the full projection range from 30 to 150 inches without obvious softness at the larger end. Color is handled by TCL’s ImmersiColor Technology, covering 99% of the Rec. 709 color space, the standard most streaming content is mastered against. A 1,000,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio adds depth to dark-scene performance that the compact form might otherwise limit.

The Intelligent Correction suite is where much of the practical imaging convenience lives. Real-time autofocus, keystone correction, Auto Fit Screen, Auto Obstacle Avoidance, and Auto Eye Protection work together to compress what’s typically a multi-step manual calibration process into something closer to an automatic one. Place the unit, rotate the top toward the wall or ceiling, and the image settles into position on its own within seconds.

Running Google TV natively makes a meaningful difference compared to a projector manufacturer’s in-house smart system. The app ecosystem and interface logic are a step above what most projectors ship with, and the officially licensed Netflix integration removes one of the category’s most persistent frustrations, since many devices either lack direct access or rely on workarounds and external devices.

The built-in speaker is a single 5W driver, suited to personal viewing and small gatherings in quieter settings. It won’t challenge a dedicated audio setup, but Bluetooth 5.1 makes connecting an external speaker simple, and the 3.5mm output handles wired alternatives. EQ presets for movies, music, and sports give the built-in driver more adaptability across content types, which helps when the PlayCube moves between different environments.

The 1.21:1 throw ratio is well-suited to typical room dimensions, making it practical to fill a 100-inch screen without pushing the unit into a far corner. Noise is rated to be around 26dB, which means the fan is slightly audible but not enough to compete with dialogue or pull attention during quieter scenes. These specs make the PlayCube more suited for use in small rooms, but it definitely has a place outdoors, provided it’s dark enough.

Sustainability

The outdoor waterproof speaker fabric wrapped around the PlayCube is made from eco-friendly recycled materials, a detail that doesn’t read as an afterthought. TCL selected it for its acoustic properties and environmental resilience, so the sustainability credentials are attached to a component doing genuine functional work. A material choice grounded in responsible sourcing that also serves acoustic and protective purposes is a rarer alignment than it should be.

Without a replaceable lamp, the PlayCube avoids one of the more persistent limitations of traditional projectors, with no bulb to monitor and no degradation cycle that shortens its useful life prematurely. The fabric exterior also protects the optical housing during transit, making it more resilient than a typical plastic-shelled portable. A projector built for real portability tends to stay in service longer, which benefits environmental footprint and practical value equally.

Value

The PlayCube isn’t aimed at the budget end of the market, and the package supports that positioning. A 1080p DLP engine, 750 ISO lumens, officially licensed Google TV and Netflix, a 66Wh built-in battery, and award-recognized design together form a more complete proposition than most portable projectors at a comparable price. The cost reflects a device where each element was built to serve the others, not assembled from separate decisions.

The value case is strongest for buyers who’ve experienced the gap between what portable projectors promise and what they actually deliver. If the usual frustrations include needing an external streaming device, manual keystone corrections after every move, or improvised elevation workarounds to get the angle right, the PlayCube addresses all three as part of its base design, without additional accessories or workarounds required.

Buyers focused on raw lumen output or built-in audio power will find options that compete more aggressively on those individual metrics. What’s harder to find is a portable projector where the form, the smart platform, the auto-calibration, and the physical placement flexibility are all pulling toward the same experience. The PlayCube’s value sits in that coherence, and it’s a harder thing to quantify than brightness numbers or battery ratings.

Verdict

The TCL PlayCube brings together design decisions that rarely appear in the same device. The twistable cube form, fabric-wrapped exterior, Intelligent Correction suite, and self-contained Google TV platform all work toward the same goal: a portable projector that’s genuinely easy to use across different environments, not just one that lists portability on the box. That coherence is uncommon in a category that frequently trades usability for spec comparisons.

It’ll resonate most with people who’ve grown frustrated with how much effort the category usually demands. The image quality is solid, the smart features work without a separate dongle, and the rotating form makes placement far less of a puzzle. For anyone after a big-screen experience that moves with them as naturally as it performs, the PlayCube is an easy recommendation and an even easier product to live with.

The post TCL PlayCube Review: One Twist Replaces Your Entire Projector Setup first appeared on Yanko Design.

DJI Osmo Pocket 4 Review: A $486 Pocket Camera That Earns Its Price

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Handy 107GB internal storage

  • Excellent low-light performance

  • Bright screen and creator-friendly controls

CONS:


  • Portrait mode tops out at 3K

  • Low-light mode for video is 1x zoom only

  • No formal water and dust resistance rating

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The DJI Osmo Pocket 4 doesn't ask you to compromise between portability and quality. It just delivers both.

The gap between smartphone convenience and dedicated camera quality has never been more complicated to navigate. Smartphones shoot impressive footage, but the moment you start walking, panning, or filming yourself without a stabilizer, the limitations show. Shaky handheld video, compromised low-light performance, and the inconvenience of carrying a larger camera rig have pushed creators to look for a smarter middle ground.

The DJI Osmo Pocket 4 is designed to solve that exact problem. Building on a line of compact gimbal cameras that have quietly become a go-to tool for vloggers and travel creators alike, the fourth generation pushes the formula further with an improved sensor, smarter tracking, and a handful of practical upgrades that address the friction points that have always come with shooting on the go.

Designer: DJI

Aesthetics

The Osmo Pocket 4 doesn’t try to look exciting. Its silhouette is tall and narrow, with a small three-axis gimbal head sitting at the top. It’s a restrained design that communicates precision rather than personality, and that’s part of the appeal. The matte black finish and clean lines make it look purposeful without being flashy, which is exactly the visual confidence that good industrial design earns.

What makes it visually distinctive is the tension between the utilitarian body and the delicate gimbal mechanism at the top. The rotating touchscreen adds a layer of mechanical thoughtfulness to the otherwise straightforward form. Up close, the camera looks precise and well-assembled, with tight tolerances and a consistent finish across its surfaces. It’s the kind of object that rewards a closer look.

The Creator Combo accessories, including the magnetic fill light and the wide-angle lens, add functional range without dramatically changing the camera’s character. They fit onto the device with minimal fuss and are compact enough to carry without much extra bulk. The wide-angle lens introduces some edge distortion, a minor tradeoff, and it needs to be removed before powering the camera down, making it a small but notable habit to build.

Ergonomics

At 190.5g and measuring 144.2mm x 44.4mm x 33.5mm, the Osmo Pocket 4 genuinely fits in a pocket. That sounds like a marketing line, but it’s one of the more meaningful things you can say about a dedicated camera. It’s light enough to forget you have it and small enough that pulling it out feels no more dramatic than reaching for your phone, which is completely the point.

Operating the Osmo Pocket 4 is intuitive. Rotating the screen starts recording automatically, a shortcut that makes spontaneous moments actually capturable. Two new buttons below the screen handle zoom and custom presets, while the 5D joystick lets you reposition the gimbal or flip the camera orientation without going into menus. The controls feel deliberate rather than crowded, and that discipline counts in a device this compact.

The 2.0-inch touchscreen is bright at 1000 nits, visible enough for outdoor framing, though it could benefit from an anti-reflective surface under harsh direct sunlight. The gimbal clamp that protects the camera head during storage is usefully low-profile, but it’s also easy to misplace precisely because of that. A lanyard attachment helps solve that problem and keeps the clamp reliably on hand whenever the camera needs to be put away.

Performance

The core of the Osmo Pocket 4’s appeal is its improved 1-inch CMOS sensor, paired with an f/2.0 lens and 14 stops of dynamic range. In practice, that combination produces video with noticeably more texture and tonal depth than a typical smartphone sensor can manage. Highlight retention in bright outdoor scenes holds up well, and shadow detail in mixed-light interiors stays controlled rather than collapsing into noise or flat gray.

1x (Top) | 2x (Bottom)

1x (Top) | Wide Lens Attachment (Bottom)

Low-light performance is one of the Pocket 4’s stronger points, both for still photos and videos. The dedicated low-light video mode produces clean, well-exposed footage in dim environments where smartphones typically struggle with noise and color accuracy. Sadly, the latter comes with a hidden cost: low-light video mode only works at 1x zoom.

The magnetic fill light from the Creator Combo is a helpful companion for indoor portraits and evening setups, adding enough brightness to make skin tones look clear, though it’s more of a useful enhancement than an absolute necessity. The Osmo Pocket 4 works well enough on its own for nighttime photography and low-lit environments, but in pitch-black situations, the fill light snaps on in a flash, pardon the pun.

Panorama

Landscape

Vertical

For video enthusiasts, the 4K/240 fps slow-motion mode is a genuine highlight. Capturing slow motion at that resolution opens up detailed, cinematic-looking sequences that would have required bulkier equipment not long ago. Sadly, that 4K upgrade doesn’t apply to vertical portrait mode, which remains in 3K land. The 10-bit D-Log color profile adds post-production flexibility, capturing a wider tonal range for those who want to grade their footage in editing software. It’s a meaningful upgrade from the lighter D-Log M available on the previous generation.

With Fill Light

No Fill Light (top) | With Fill Light (bottom)

The three-axis stabilization is the product’s most compelling advantage. Walking footage stays smooth without the warping that aggressive digital stabilization sometimes produces, and ActiveTrack 7.0 tracks subjects confidently through movement at up to 4x zoom. The 107 GB of built-in storage, transferable at up to 800 MB/s via USB 3.1, removes the need for a memory card on most shoots and makes offloading footage back at a desk genuinely fast.

Pitch Black

With Fill Light

Night Shot (Without Fill Light)

Night Shot (With Fill Light)

Sustainability

The Osmo Pocket 4 doesn’t make bold claims about eco-friendly materials, and that honesty is more useful than hollow greenwashing. What it does offer is a well-built product that feels designed to last. The body has no creaking or flex, and the feature set is current enough that it isn’t likely to feel obsolete quickly. That kind of longevity is a meaningful sustainability argument for a consumer electronics device.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t come with any water or dust resistance guarantee, let alone a formal IP (ingress protection) rating. The Osmo Pocket 4 is best used with a bit of care outdoors, since its gimbal-based design doesn’t lend itself to the kind of weather resistance you’d expect from a rugged action camera.

Like most compact gimbal cameras, the Pocket 4 isn’t particularly serviceable at the consumer level. Tightly integrated components make independent repair difficult, so long-term ownership depends on careful handling more than easy maintenance. That said, the modular accessory system means you’re less likely to replace the camera because one peripheral breaks or becomes outdated. The accessories extend the product’s useful life without requiring a full device swap.

Value

At $486, the Osmo Pocket 4 sits at a price point where expectations of serious performance are fair, and for the most part, it delivers. What you’re paying for isn’t just a feature list but the engineering that concentrates stabilization, a 1-inch sensor, internal storage, and creator-focused controls into something pocketable. That concentration costs more than a simpler compact camera, and the footage quality shows where the money went.

The $607 Creator Combo version adds genuine value through the DJI Mic 3 transmitter, the fill light, and a handful of supporting accessories. The wireless microphone alone is a meaningful addition for anyone who records dialogue, since the built-in setup works well but can’t match a properly placed lapel mic. Together, these accessories shift the package from a capable camera into a more complete creator kit.

For creators who shoot on the go regularly and want footage that looks better than what a phone can deliver, the Pocket 4 sits in a position few other devices can match cleanly. The form factor eliminates excuses for not having the camera out, the stabilization removes the need for post-production smoothing, and the image quality means you’re not apologizing for what you captured.

Verdict

The Osmo Pocket 4 is a thoughtfully resolved compact camera that does its intended job with real consistency. The stabilized footage looks clean and confident, the low-light performance holds up better than the size suggests, and the built-in storage removes a quiet but persistent inconvenience. These aren’t small things for a device that has to fit in your jeans pocket while still competing with cameras twice its size.

There are tradeoffs, as there always are with a device optimized this tightly. Portrait shooting tops out at 3K rather than full 4K, the low-light mode locks to 1x zoom, and the lack of weather sealing limits it in unpredictable outdoor conditions. These aren’t dealbreakers so much as parameters, and understanding them is all it takes to decide whether the Pocket 4 fits the footage you actually want to make.

The post DJI Osmo Pocket 4 Review: A $486 Pocket Camera That Earns Its Price first appeared on Yanko Design.

Unihertz Titan 2 Elite Review: Finally a QWERTY Phone Done Right

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Excellent QWERTY keyboard

  • Thoughtful software features

  • Sharp 4.03-inch AMOLED display

CONS:


  • 33W charging feels a little slow

  • Cameras are unremarkable

  • Mono speaker lacks depth

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The Titan 2 Elite is not a keyboard phone for the sake of nostalgia. It is a thoughtfully modern take on a niche form factor that still offers something genuinely different.

Retro tech is back in fashion, and few categories capture that shift quite like the return of the QWERTY keyboard phone. With the market dominated by edge-to-edge glass slabs that all seem to blur into one another, the appeal of something tactile, distinctive, and a little nostalgic feels stronger than ever. But Unihertz is not simply chasing that renewed interest. The company has spent years building unusual smartphones around overlooked form factors, and the Titan 2 Elite feels more like a continuation of that mission than a sudden throwback play.

Since launching in 2017, Unihertz has focused on unusual and highly niche smartphones, often revisiting ideas that larger brands left behind long ago. The first Titan arrived in 2019, establishing the company’s QWERTY keyboard line and laying the groundwork for a series of devices aimed at enthusiasts who wanted something outside the touchscreen mainstream. The Titan 2 Elite feels like the clearest expression of that identity so far, combining Unihertz’s keyboard phone formula with more modern features like a 4.03-inch 120Hz AMOLED display, 5G, NFC, eSIM support, and dual 50MP cameras.

Designer: Unihertz

Aesthetics

The Titan 2 Elite makes a much stronger first impression in photos than you might expect from a niche keyboard phone. In black, it looks clean, understated, and surprisingly modern, with the glossy display flowing neatly into the keyboard below. The shape still carries that familiar BlackBerry-inspired DNA, but it feels less boxy and less utilitarian than its predecessors. The front has a nice sense of balance, with the display and keyboard split in a way that looks intentional rather than cramped.

It also feels like every brand is suddenly on the orange phone wave, and Unihertz is clearly not sitting that one out. Still, I cannot really complain when the result looks this good. The orange finish gives the Titan 2 Elite a more playful, more attention-grabbing personality, and it suits the phone’s retro-leaning concept surprisingly well. Paired with the sculpted keyboard and rounded corners, it gives the device a bolder, more expressive look that stands out immediately. Where the black version feels sleek and safe, the orange one feels much more full of character.

From the front, the Titan 2 Elite feels cohesive in a way some keyboard phones do not. The keyboard looks properly built into the design rather than tacked on as an afterthought, which helps the whole phone feel more intentional and visually balanced. Flip it over, though, and some of that charm fades. The large rectangular camera bump sticks out quite a lot, especially on the orange model, and the back just does not feel as refined as the front. I do like how subtle the Unihertz logo is, but overall, the rear design feels more ordinary and less resolved.

Ergonomics

The whole experience of using the Titan 2 Elite comes down to the keyboard. If you have been away from physical keys for years, there is definitely a short adjustment period, but once your fingers settle in, the appeal becomes easy to understand. Typing feels more deliberate, more tactile, and more engaging than tapping away on glass, even if, for me, an on-screen keyboard is still the faster option. That is worth saying because speed is not really the point here. The appeal is the feel of it, and the way it changes your interaction with the phone.

The keys have a faceted, slightly angled shape that makes them surprisingly comfortable to type on. In fact, this is one of the most comfortable QWERTY keyboards I have tested on a phone. The layout feels well judged, and while it still takes some adjustment, it does not come across as cramped or awkward in the way some smaller keyboard phones can.

At 117.8 × 75 × 10.4 mm and 163g, the Titan 2 Elite is compact in height and width, but it is definitely a thick phone by modern standards. You feel that extra depth the moment you pick it up, especially compared with today’s thin slab phones. Still, the weight is fairly modest, so it does not come across as heavy or cumbersome. If anything, the thicker body makes sense for this kind of device, giving the keyboard and overall shape a bit more substance in the hand.

The rest of the button layout is pretty straightforward, but there are a few details worth noting. On the right side, you get the power button, which also doubles as a fingerprint scanner, along with Unihertz’s signature red programmable button. On the left, there is the volume rocker and the SIM tray, which supports either two SIM cards or one SIM card and one microSD card. It is a practical setup, and the red shortcut key in particular adds a bit of extra personality while giving power users one more tool to customize the phone around their habits.

Performance

The Titan 2 Elite is not the kind of phone you buy for raw speed, and I think that is important to establish early. If your priority is benchmark numbers, heavy gaming, or the kind of power you would expect from a mainstream flagship, this is probably not where your money should go. The appeal here is much more about the overall experience than outright performance, which feels perfectly in line with what this phone is trying to be.

It is powered by the Dimensity 7400, paired with 12GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 256GB of storage. In everyday use, that is more than enough for the kind of tasks this phone is clearly built around. Messaging, email, web browsing, note-taking, and general app navigation all feel smooth and reliable, and at no point did the phone feel like it was struggling to keep up.

That same sense of practicality carries over to the software. The review unit runs Titan 2 Elite_V02 based on Android 16, and thankfully, there is no bloatware to get in the way. A lot of the customization revolves around the keyboard and extra controls, which makes sense for a phone like this.

You can assign both short-press and long-press actions to keys, and there are also options to use the keyboard surface for scrolling, cursor control, or a combined touchpad and cursor mode. Better still, these can be set on an app-by-app basis, which gives the phone a level of flexibility that feels genuinely useful rather than gimmicky. The keyboard is also backlit, and the brightness can be adjusted, which is a small but genuinely helpful detail in lower light.

The 4.03-inch display also deserves some credit. On paper, it sounds small, and it is, but it is a surprisingly good panel with a 1080 x 1200 resolution, 120Hz refresh rate, 401 PPI, up to 1600 nits peak brightness, and 2160Hz PWM dimming. It looks sharp, bright, and much more modern than the phone’s form factor might suggest.

Where the screen becomes more complicated is in day-to-day use. The issue is not the quality of the panel itself, but the amount of space you have to work with. Some apps feel poorly formatted, and there are times when you simply want to see more vertical content at once. Unihertz tries to solve that with a Mini mode that switches the interface to a more traditional vertical aspect ratio, and it does help. I ended up setting a shortcut for it, and being able to switch quickly turned out to be genuinely useful.

Main, 1x

It also changed the way I used the phone. I spent less time mindlessly scrolling, and that is not because the phone is uncomfortable to hold or awkward to use. If anything, it is the opposite. The Titan 2 Elite just makes you a bit more intentional.

Telephoto, 2x

That more focused experience also shapes the rest of the phone. Audio, for example, is fine but unremarkable. The mono speaker gets loud enough for casual video watching or speakerphone use, but it lacks the fullness you would want for music or anything more immersive. It does the job, but not much more.

Main, 1x

Telephoto, 2x

The same goes for the camera setup. It is fairly limited, but that probably will not be a dealbreaker for the kind of person who would enjoy this phone in the first place. You get a 50MP main camera, a 50MP 2x telephoto camera, and a 32MP front camera. Image quality is good enough for quick shots and everyday moments, but it is not a camera system that stands out. Colors tend to look vivid and slightly overexposed, though still perfectly usable for casual snapshots.

Main, 1x

Telephoto, 2x

Battery life is better than the 4050mAh capacity might suggest. On paper, that number does not sound especially large, but because I spent less time idly using the phone, it still got me through a full day without much trouble. Charging is less impressive. At 33W, it feels a bit slow by today’s standards, especially when plenty of phones in this price range now refill much faster.

Sustainability

Sustainability is not a major part of the Titan 2 Elite’s pitch, but there are still a few positives worth mentioning. Unihertz says the phone uses an aerospace-grade aluminum mid-frame, offers IP54 protection, and promises five years of OS updates and security patches.

That is not the same as a full sustainability strategy, especially since there is no clear emphasis on recycled materials or repairability. Still, durability and longer software support do matter. If the Titan 2 Elite holds up well over time and stays secure for years, that gives owners more reason to keep it longer instead of replacing it early.

Value

At $489, the Titan 2 Elite is not cheap, but it also feels more thoughtfully made than a novelty device cashing in on nostalgia. Beyond the physical keyboard itself, you can tell Unihertz has put real thought into the overall experience, from the programmable keys and backlit keyboard to the display quality and software features built around this unusual form factor.

That is really where the value starts to make sense. You are not just paying for a keyboard stuck onto an Android phone. You are paying for a device that feels purpose-built for a certain kind of user, and one that tries to make that experience work in a modern way. It still will not be for everyone, but for people who genuinely want a keyboard phone and appreciate the care that has gone into making it usable day to day, the $489 price feels much easier to justify.

Verdict

The Unihertz Titan 2 Elite works because it does not try to compete like a normal smartphone. Instead, it fully embraces its niche, offering a physical keyboard experience that feels polished, distinctive, and genuinely enjoyable to use. Backed by a sharp display, thoughtful software features, and reliable everyday performance, it feels much more considered than a simple nostalgia play.

The trade-offs are still there. The cameras are only decent, the speaker is forgettable, and the small display can feel restrictive in some apps. Still, if you miss physical keys or just want a phone that feels more intentional and different from the crowd, the Titan 2 Elite makes a strong case for itself. It will not be for everyone, but for the right user, it is one of the most appealing niche phones you can buy.

The post Unihertz Titan 2 Elite Review: Finally a QWERTY Phone Done Right first appeared on Yanko Design.

Motorola Edge (2026) Review: Beautiful, Brilliant, and an Acquired Taste

Posted on by

PROS:


  • Excellent compact form factor

  • Stylish and calm design

  • Sharp, vibrant 120Hz display

CONS:


  • 128Gb storage feels limiting

  • Software support is shorter than many rivals

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The Motorola Edge 2026's compact size, clean software, and thoughtful design give it a charm that many rivals simply do not have, though it might not be the right fit for everyone.

Motorola’s comeback story is about more than nostalgia. The brand may still benefit from a familiar name and a long history in mobile, but its recent momentum has not come from recognition alone. Rather than simply trading on memory, Motorola has been building devices that feel stylish, approachable, and increasingly self-assured in a market that rarely makes room for second chances.

The Edge 2026 reflects that progress, even if it does not fully embody it. This is a phone with a clear sense of what it wants to prioritize, namely comfort, portability, and day-to-day ease, but it enters a crowded midrange field where those strengths have to work harder to justify the price. That makes the Edge 2026 easy to appreciate in some ways, but harder to justify in others. The real question is whether Motorola’s priorities here line up with what buyers at this price actually want.

Designer: Motorola

Aesthetics

There is something very Motorola about the way this device presents itself. The brand has become increasingly confident with phones that blend fashion-minded styling and mainstream usability, and the Edge 2026 continues that direction with ease. It looks premium without trying too hard, which is often one of the most difficult tricks to pull off in this category.

That confidence comes through clearly in the details. The back panel uses a twill-inspired finish in Pantone Martini Olive, and it gives the phone a softer, more composed visual character than the usual glossy midrange formula. Paired with the brushed gold camera bump, the centered Motorola logo, and the brushed finish frame, the whole design has a calm, almost zen-like quality. It feels restrained, but not plain, and that balance works in its favor.

It also looks strikingly close to Motorola’s flagship Signature, which is not currently available in the U.S. That resemblance gives the Edge 2026 a more elevated presence than its price might suggest, even if it also makes the phone feel a touch less distinctive on its own terms. Unlike the Signature, which comes in both Pantone Carbon and Pantone Martini Olive, the Edge 2026 is limited to just this one color option, though some buyers may wish Motorola had offered a bit more variety.

Ergonomics

This is one of the most defining parts of the Edge 2026 experience. Motorola shrank the Edge from 6.7 inches to 6.3 inches, and that change has a bigger impact than it might seem on paper. With its more compact body, the phone feels noticeably easier to manage than many of the larger devices around it in this price range. The difference may sound small in theory, but in daily use, it changes a lot.

The Edge 2026 is genuinely pleasant to hold. It is easier to grip, easier to reach across, and easier to use one-handed without constantly adjusting your hold. In fact, it is one of the most pleasant phones I have tested in a very long time. The finish also helps in everyday use, because it does a good job resisting fingerprint smudges and light scratches, which makes the phone easier to keep looking clean over time.

Personally, I do not mind a bulkier phone if that extra size delivers the best possible experience. I know not everyone feels the same way, though, and that is exactly why a phone like the Edge 2026 makes sense. What we want from smartphones is different, and for people who care more about getting the basics right in a device that feels super portable and genuinely comfortable in the hand, this one feels very well judged.

The one clear ergonomic drawback is the fingerprint scanner placement. It sits a little too close to the bottom edge, which can make it feel slightly awkward to reach at first. It is not a major flaw, and it becomes easier to adapt to over time, but it does stand out on a phone that otherwise feels so carefully shaped.

Performance

On paper, the Motorola Edge 2026 does not sound especially aggressive for the money. It runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7450 chipset with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage in the U.S. model. While the chip is a modest upgrade over the previous generation, the drop from 256GB to 128GB feels less welcome.

In daily use, performance is solid without being especially impressive. Apps open quickly enough, scrolling feels smooth, and everyday tasks rarely cause much friction. For lighter users, 128GB should still be manageable, but anyone who takes lots of photos and videos, plays large games, or downloads media may run into storage limits sooner than expected.

Motorola’s software remains one of the phone’s more appealing strengths. The interface feels clean, light, and relatively uncluttered, and it was refreshing to use a phone that does not come buried under bloatware. I also liked Motorola’s added gestures and shortcuts, especially the double chop to turn the torch on and off, the double twist to quickly open the camera, and the option to flip the phone over to enable Do Not Disturb.

The company’s added features feel more useful than intrusive, which makes the software easy to settle into from the start. That said, I do wish Motorola included its own gallery app with built-in editing tools instead of relying entirely on Google Photos. Google Photos works well enough, but it does not feel as tailored or as seamless as a dedicated first-party gallery experience.

The 6.3-inch display is a big part of what makes the Edge 2026 feel great to use. With a resolution of 1216 x 2640 and a 120Hz refresh rate, the panel looks sharp, vibrant, and smooth, while the smaller size helps the phone feel more manageable without making the screen feel cramped. It also supports 1 billion colors and HDR10+, which gives content a richer and more lively look.

Colors have plenty of punch, and the display is enjoyable for everything from reading to streaming video. Audio is surprisingly rich and loud for such a compact phone, which adds to the overall media experience. Together, the screen and speakers make the Edge 2026 feel more immersive than its size might suggest.

Main Camera, 1x

The camera setup seems largely unchanged from its predecessor. The main camera uses a 50MP 1/1.56 inch Sony LYT 710 sensor with an f/1.8 aperture and OIS, while the 10MP telephoto camera offers 3x optical zoom with an f/2.0 aperture and OIS. The LYT 710 should bring modest improvements in light sensitivity and noise reduction over the sensor used in the previous model.

Main Camera, 1x

Main Camera, 2x

Main Camera, 3x

There is also a 50MP ultra-wide camera with a 122-degree field of view and an f/2.0 aperture, and it doubles as the macro camera. On the front, Motorola includes a 50MP selfie camera with an f/1.95 aperture. All cameras can record video at up to 4K at 30fps.

Ultra-wide

It is a well-rounded setup overall, and I was pleasantly surprised by it. It is not on the same level as a true flagship camera system, of course, but I found the color tuning more pleasing in some situations. The main camera handles dynamic range well enough to feel reliable for everyday use.

Main Camera, Portrait Mode (24mm)

Main Camera, Portrait Mode (35mm)

Telephoto Camera, Portrait Mode

The telephoto camera adds some welcome flexibility, even if its limitations become more obvious once you push beyond 3x. The phone automatically switches between the main and telephoto lenses depending on the scene, and while the telephoto camera is not especially detailed, it tends to get exposure right even in difficult lighting. Low light performance is solid too, though the shutter speed can be frustratingly slow even outside of Night mode, which makes it easier to end up with blur if your subject moves or your hand is not perfectly steady.

Telephoto Camera, 3x

Telephoto Camera, 3x

Main Camera, 6x

The battery has been reduced from 5200mAh on the previous model to 5000mAh, which is not especially exciting on paper. Even so, the phone remains efficient enough to last a full day comfortably, and light users may even be able to stretch it into a second day. That fits well with the Edge 2026’s broader focus on comfort and everyday ease.

Charging is solid, too. The 68W wired charging is quick enough to feel genuinely convenient, and 15W wireless charging adds a welcome bit of flexibility. Neither feature is especially headline-grabbing, but together they make the phone easy to live with.

Sustainability

The Motorola Edge 2026 makes a solid case for itself on durability. It is rated IP68 and IP69, uses Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, and also meets MIL-STD-810H standards. Motorola says it is designed to survive drops from up to 1.22 meters and handle extreme temperatures and high humidity.

That toughness helps its long-term appeal. The software support, however, is less impressive. Motorola promises two major OS upgrades and three years of security updates, which falls short of what many rivals now offer at this price.

Value

At $599.99, the Motorola Edge 2026 sits in a competitive part of the market, but its value becomes easier to understand once you look beyond the spec sheet. This feels like a phone aimed more at lighter users, especially with 128GB of storage, and its compact form factor is a big part of the appeal. The size, comfort, and ease of use give it an everyday charm that many rivals simply do not have.

That said, value is also shaped by how long a phone is likely to feel current. Motorola only promises two major OS upgrades and three years of security updates, which is not especially generous at this price. If you tend to keep your phone for many years, that shorter support window may matter more, even if the hardware itself feels pleasant and durable enough to last.

Verdict

The Motorola Edge 2026 knows exactly what it wants to be. It prioritizes comfort, portability, and everyday ease, and that gives it a clearer identity than many midrange phones. Its compact form factor is easily one of its best qualities, and for people who want a phone that simply feels great in the hand, it is a strong contender.

That said, it is not without compromise. The 128GB storage feels limiting, the software support is shorter than some rivals, and the performance is solid rather than standout. Still, for the right user, especially someone who values portability and comfort above all else, the Edge 2026 remains an appealing option.

The post Motorola Edge (2026) Review: Beautiful, Brilliant, and an Acquired Taste first appeared on Yanko Design.