Rear Screens Were a Flagship Trick, so Honor Put One on a Budget Phone

Secondary rear displays have been a flagship trick for a while, the kind of feature that premium phones use to justify their price tags. The Honor Play20A throws that logic out. It’s an entry-level 4G phone with a 6.9-inch main screen, a 6,000mAh battery, and a small secondary display built into the camera module on the back, at a price that isn’t anywhere near flagship territory.

The rear screen isn’t just decorative. It shows the time, incoming call details, and what’s currently playing, so you can pause or skip tracks without flipping the phone over. It also works as a viewfinder, letting you frame shots with the 13MP rear camera rather than the 5MP front camera inside the notch. In practice, that means group photos taken with the better lens rather than settling for the weaker front sensor.

Designer: Honor

That 13MP rear camera is the only functional one despite the module’s appearance. There’s no telephoto, no depth sensor, no second anything hiding behind the glass. It’s a single lens, and the design leans into the secondary screen to make up for the hardware economy. For everyday shooting, the combination works reasonably well, and it sidesteps the common frustration of front cameras that can’t match the quality of the back.

The main screen is a 6.9-inch IPS LCD running at 90Hz with an HD+ resolution of 1600×720. It’s a big panel with slim bezels and a waterdrop notch, and 90Hz makes scrolling feel noticeably smoother than phones still running at 60Hz. That refresh rate isn’t guaranteed at this price point, which makes its inclusion here more meaningful than it might look on a spec sheet.

The 6,000mAh battery is the other headliner. It charges at 15W via USB-C, which is modest given the capacity, so filling it up from empty takes some patience. The trade-off is that you’re unlikely to drain it before the day is done under normal circumstances. A battery this size in a budget phone tends to last considerably longer than comparable handsets that prioritize thinness over endurance.

Running all of this is the MediaTek Helio G81, an octa-core chip built on a 12nm process. It handles messaging, browsing, video streaming, and social media without issue. Intensive tasks aren’t what this phone is built for, and the chip doesn’t pretend otherwise. Paired with 4GB of RAM and up to 128GB of storage, expandable to 1TB via microSD, the Honor Play20A is configured for people who need a phone to do a lot of everyday things reliably.

Connectivity stays at 4G, with no 5G on board, which fits a budget positioning but is worth noting for anyone in a market where 5G coverage has become the practical standard. The triple tray accommodates two SIM cards and a microSD card at the same time, without asking you to choose between extra storage and a second line. The secondary rear display is the feature that makes this phone worth talking about, but the battery and the large screen are what most buyers will end up living with daily.

The post Rear Screens Were a Flagship Trick, so Honor Put One on a Budget Phone first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Xperia 10 VIII Has Rare Android Features, but £549 Is the Catch

The Sony Xperia 10 VIII is a compact 6.1-inch Android phone with a 3.5mm headphone jack, a dedicated microSD slot, a 5,000mAh battery, and an IP68 water resistance rating. In 2026, that combination is genuinely hard to find on any phone, let alone a mid-ranger. It also costs £549, which is where the conversation gets complicated.

The display is one of the few areas where the 10 VIII makes a clear step forward. Sony says the OLED panel is roughly 50% brighter at maximum than last year’s model, and it pairs that with an automatic color-adjustment system that reads ambient light to keep text and maps legible in direct sun. For a compact phone that goes everywhere, screen visibility in bright conditions matters more than any benchmark.

Designer: Sony

The camera setup stays at 50MP on the main sensor and 13MP on the ultrawide, which is the same hardware as the Xperia 10 VII. The lens combination covers most of what everyday shooting actually demands, and Sony’s imaging tuning has always leaned toward natural color reproduction rather than the overly saturated processing that many phones default to. It’s a camera made for people who shoot, not people who want to appear to shoot.

Battery longevity is built into both the hardware and the software. The 5,000mAh cell comes with Sony’s battery-care system, which manages charge cycles to minimize long-term degradation. The company is also promising six years of software updates here, a notable jump from the four years offered on its predecessor. Getting six years out of a mid-range phone is a meaningful practical advantage.

The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 inside is the same chip that powered the Xperia 10 VII, which launched a year ago. It handles social media, streaming, and everyday tasks without issue, but it doesn’t offer much over what existing owners already have. Sony added a Point & Pay shortcut for faster contactless payments, improved the speaker output, and redesigned the back panel with a translucent matte finish in Frozen White, Frosted Grey, and Misty Lilac.

The headphone jack and microSD slot are worth more than they might initially seem. Most phones at this price tier have dropped both, forcing wireless-only audio and fixed internal storage. For anyone who owns wired headphones worth actually using, or needs to carry large media libraries on a card, those two ports turn the 10 VIII into one of the few phones in this segment that doesn’t demand compromises to accommodate them.

At £549, the Xperia 10 VIII doesn’t have an easy answer to the competition. For similar or less money, there are phones with faster chips, bigger batteries, and more capable camera systems. Sony’s argument is that none of them are this compact and this fully equipped with legacy features in a single package. That’s a narrower pitch than it sounds, but it’s also a pitch that doesn’t have many other phones making it.

The post The Xperia 10 VIII Has Rare Android Features, but £549 Is the Catch first appeared on Yanko Design.

Carrying a Separate Power Bank Was Always Annoying, so Nokia Fixed It

The idea of carrying a power bank separately has never been particularly glamorous. It’s another thing to charge, another thing to forget, and another thing to dig out of your bag just when you need it. The Nokia 300 Charge sidesteps that by folding the power bank into the phone itself, a feature phone with a 3,700mAh battery that can share its charge with other devices.

That 3,700mAh figure sounds modest until you consider what it’s sitting inside. Most feature phones top out well below 2,000mAh, and the Nokia 110 Power only packs 1,750mAh, despite the name. The 300 Charge has more than double that, giving you up to 37 hours of talk time and over 40 days of standby. For a phone living in a drawer or a travel bag, those numbers genuinely matter.

Designer: HMD Global

The reverse charging works through the same USB-C port the phone charges from, activated by a dedicated button on the side. Press it, plug in a cable, and the 300 Charge starts pushing 10W out to whatever’s connected. An included 4-in-1 cable covers most devices you’d commonly carry, and the phone itself charges at the same 10W speed when it’s on the receiving end.

Long travel days and power outages share a common anxiety: a smartphone dying when there’s no wall socket in sight. You’d normally be counting on someone else’s power bank to get through. With the Nokia 300 Charge in your bag, you’re already carrying the solution. It’s the kind of device that makes sense stashed in a go-bag, a glove compartment, or a festival backpack before a long weekend.

Then there’s the torch. The Nokia 300 Charge has a high-power LED flashlight that’s reportedly four times brighter than the one on the Nokia 105. That kind of output actually matters when the power goes out, or you need to navigate somewhere dark. Rather than a gimmick, it’s one of the more immediately useful things on the device, especially given what the phone is designed to handle.

The phone is built for situations where things get knocked around. A rugged chassis with a textured, anti-slip grip keeps it secure in your hand, while the overall package comes in at 138 grams and about 15mm thick. It doesn’t feel like a compromise between durability and portability. Available in Sandstone, Green, and Black, the colorways lean practical rather than flashy.

On the inside, the Nokia 300 Charge keeps things simple. A 2.4-inch display, a microSD slot expandable up to 32GB, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and dual SIM support cover the basics. Connectivity is 2G only, which limits it to regions where that network infrastructure is still active. It’s worth confirming coverage before picking one up for travel, since some markets have already shut down their 2G networks.

The Nokia 300 Charge launched in the Philippines at around $32, with a wider international rollout expected. The battery is removable, a practical detail that most phone makers have quietly dropped. It charges at 10W via USB-C, matching the same output it provides when sharing power. A feature phone that calls, texts, lights your way, and tops up other devices at that price doesn’t need a complicated pitch.

The post Carrying a Separate Power Bank Was Always Annoying, so Nokia Fixed It first appeared on Yanko Design.

Apple is Building a Short, Wide iPhone Ultra… Now It Owes Us an Actual iPhone Mini

I have a friend who still uses an iPhone 13 mini held together by a case and pure spite, and every single time a new iPhone launches, she asks me the same question. Is it small yet. It never is. Apple has spent years telling us, implicitly, that small phones do not sell, that the market has spoken, that everyone wants a bigger canvas for videos and games and doomscrolling. Fine, sure, the sales numbers backed that up in 2023. But sales numbers do not mean the desire disappeared, they mean the alternative was not good enough to fight for.

Which brings me to the iPhone Ultra, Apple’s rumored first foldable, expected to close into a short, squat, almost passport-shaped little brick before you unfold it into something the size of an iPad mini. That folded shape is the closest thing to mini energy Apple has shown in years, and it is buried inside a two thousand dollar folding phone nobody asked to be the delivery method. My friend does not want an iPad mini that folds. She wants her 13 mini, but new. Apple already built the shape. It just built it around the wrong phone.

Designer: Apple

The Air existed to answer a question almost nobody was asking at checkout, namely how thin can a phone get before the internals start filing complaints. It was a genuine engineering flex, the kind of thing that looks incredible in a teardown video and slightly pointless in daily use. I understood what it was trying to prove. I just never needed it proven to me personally, and I doubt I was alone in that.

The Ultra is rumored to repeat that exact flex, except this time the thinness gets folded in half, closing down to somewhere between 9 and 9.5mm shut and reportedly as thin as 4.5mm open, according to recent leaks. That is a genuinely wild number for a phone with a hinge in it. Apple is once again proving it can do the hard, borderline unnecessary engineering thing. The difference is that this time, buried inside that flex, is an actual shape people have been begging for since 2023. Apple just does not seem to have noticed it yet.

Go back and look at what the 13 mini actually was for a second, because I think people forget how unremarkable the compromise really was. It measured 131.5mm tall, 64.2mm wide, weighed 141 grams, and ran the exact same A15 chip as the standard 13. You gave up battery life and screen real estate. You did not give up the flagship experience shrunk down to fit an actual hand. Compare that to where the standard iPhone lineup sits today, regularly north of 6.1 inches before you even get to Pro Max territory, and the gap the mini used to fill has only gotten wider and lonelier.

Now put the Ultra’s folded footprint next to that. Reports point to a 5.5 inch cover display when shut, in a short, wide, passport style shell that is about as close to mini adjacent proportions as Apple has shipped since the mini died. The catch is that this compact shell only exists as a doorway into a 7.8 inch, 4:3 inner screen and a starting price rumored to land somewhere between 1,999 and 2,499 dollars. Nobody buying that phone is buying it to have something small in their pocket. They are buying an iPad mini that happens to fold shut, which is a completely different pitch than the one my friend has been asking me about for three years running.

There has been some loose speculation, mostly a 9to5Mac piece from last year, that Apple’s new staggered launch schedule could theoretically clear a runway for a smaller phone somewhere down the line. Even that piece called the odds slim to none, and nothing currently on Apple’s roadmap for the 18, 18e, 18 Pro, or Ultra includes a mini in any form. Samsung, for what it is worth, has stuck with its Z Flip clamshell as its own answer to compact, so the appetite for small has not vanished industry wide, it has just gone unanswered on Apple’s side of the fence for a while now.

So here is the pitch, and it is not a complicated one. Apple has now proven twice, once with the Air and once with the Ultra’s folded shell, that it can engineer real compactness without breaking anything important. Skip the fold. Skip the tablet trapped inside a phone shaped envelope. Take that exact short, wide, passport sized footprint and wrap a single, non folding screen around it, call it a mini, and ship it. Apple does not need a new idea here. It already built one. It just keeps hiding it inside features nobody was asking it to attach to.

The post Apple is Building a Short, Wide iPhone Ultra… Now It Owes Us an Actual iPhone Mini first appeared on Yanko Design.

Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max Review: A Beautiful Comeback With Caveats

PROS:


  • Distinctive design with bold color options

  • Large, sharp display with anti-reflective treatment

  • Excellent main and telephoto cameras

CONS:


  • Performance is not class-leading

  • Weak cross-platform file sharing

  • No clear update policy

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS
ERGONOMICS
PERFORMANCE
SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY
VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The Pura 90s Pro Max feels less like a safe flagship and more like a characterful one, which makes it easier to admire than to recommend without hesitation.

It has been a long time since I last reviewed a Huawei phone. The last one was the Huawei P50 Pocket Premium Edition. I still remember that phone well because it was genuinely beautiful. It had the kind of design that instantly felt premium, and it reminded me how good Huawei can be when it wants to make a phone stand out.

A lot has changed since then. The P series is now called Pura, but Huawei’s approach to hardware and design still feels very familiar. The company still knows how to make a flagship look different, and in a market where so many phones are starting to blend together, that still matters.

Designer: Huawei

This time around, Huawei is offering the Pura 90s Pro and the Pura 90s Pro Max. What is interesting is that there is no Ultra model in the lineup, unlike before. That means the Pura 90s Pro Max now sits at the top of the range. It also brings back 5G, which makes this release feel a bit more important than just another yearly update.

The Pura 90s Pro Max has all the right flagship ingredients at first glance. Big screen, ambitious cameras, premium build, and fast charging are all here. The question is whether that is enough to make it a great phone overall.

Aesthetics

The Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max carries the now-familiar triangular camera island that has become a signature since Pura 70. It features two black circular cutouts for the ultra-wide and main cameras, along with a larger black circle for the telephoto camera. A pill-shaped LED flash also sits within the module, completing the layout. It is the kind of design detail that makes the phone instantly recognizable from across a table.

Huawei has also put real effort into the color finishes this year. The Pura 90s Pro Max comes in four colors, and two of them stand out immediately because of their dual-tone gradient treatment. The Blaze Purple unit I received pairs a purple upper half with an orangish-pink lower section, matched with a glossy gold frame that adds even more flair. It is bold, but it never tips into looking gaudy. Instead, it still feels polished and premium.

The other standout is Orange Ocean, which arguably takes the two-tone concept even further. It combines light blue at the top with orange at the bottom, while the center transitions smoothly between the two shades. Even the side frame follows the same color story, which makes the overall design feel more cohesive and more intentional. It is the kind of finish that feels playful at first glance, yet refined enough to belong on a flagship.

For those who prefer something safer, Huawei also offers Blush Gold and Graphite Black. These are more traditional options, but that is not necessarily a drawback. Not everyone wants their flagship phone to double as a statement piece. Still, if you are buying a Huawei at this level, the more expressive finishes are where the personality really comes through.

Ergonomics

In hand, the Pura 90s Pro Max feels better balanced than its bold design might suggest. I was unsure at first whether the large triangular camera island would make the phone feel awkward, but in daily use it never really did. If anything, when I held it one-handed in my right hand, the raised module gave my index finger a natural place to rest.

There is a tradeoff, though. When holding the phone horizontally for gaming, the camera island becomes more noticeable and can get in the way a bit. It is not a huge problem, but it stands out more in landscape use than it does during normal day-to-day handling.

The finish also looks better from a distance than it does up close. Both the glossy back panel and the glossy side frame tend to pick up fingerprints and smudges quite easily, so the phone does need regular wiping if you want it to stay looking clean. That is a little disappointing for a device that puts so much emphasis on design.

Huawei has also gone with a side-mounted fingerprint scanner rather than an in-display one. The power button on the right side doubles as the fingerprint reader, and in practice it feels intuitive enough. It is a small detail, but one that fits naturally with the overall handling experience.

Performance

The Pura 90s Pro Max is powered by Huawei’s Kirin 9030S, paired with 12GB of RAM and either 256GB or 512GB of storage. It also supports 5G, which makes it feel more competitive than some of Huawei’s recent flagships. In daily use, the phone feels fast enough. Scrolling is smooth, apps open quickly, and multitasking is handled well. For things like web browsing, social media, messaging, navigation, and streaming, it behaves like a proper flagship.

The bigger question is whether that is enough at this price. Huawei is not really chasing benchmark dominance here, and that may matter more to enthusiasts than to casual users. If all you want is a phone that feels quick and responsive day to day, the Pura 90s Pro Max delivers. If you expect class-leading performance, though, it is less convincing.

The phone runs EMUI 16, and Huawei has spent years building a more workable ecosystem around its devices. The experience today feels much less daunting than it used to, and most of the apps people need can be downloaded easily through GBox, which is now available via Huawei AppGallery.

For me, one of the biggest remaining inconveniences is file sharing across different phone ecosystems. Huawei does offer solutions such as Huawei Share for transferring files to other devices, but the experience still does not feel as seamless or as universal as what you get with iPhones or across the wider Android ecosystem. That becomes especially noticeable if you regularly share photos and videos between phones from different manufacturers.

The display is one of the easiest things to like about the Pura 90s Pro Max. It is a 6.9-inch panel with a resolution of 2880 x 1308 and a refresh rate that scales from 1Hz to 120Hz. It is large, sharp, and well suited to a phone of this size and price.

Huawei says the anti-reflective screen reduces reflections by up to 70 percent compared with conventional glass. It is not as effective as the matte-style display treatment Huawei uses on some of its tablets, but it still makes the screen easier to view outdoors under bright sunlight.

The speaker setup is solid too. The stereo speakers are good enough for videos, games, and casual listening, with enough volume to avoid sounding weak in everyday use. They do not deliver especially rich or powerful sound, but they do the job well and help round out the phone’s media experience.

Main Camera, 1x

Telephoto Camera, 10x

Main Camera, Macro Mode

Cameras remain one of the main reasons to pay attention to Huawei’s flagship phones, and that is still true here. The Pura 90s Pro Max has an ambitious camera setup, even if some of Huawei’s decisions this time feel a little unusual. On paper, it is a system that feels both impressive and slightly puzzling at the same time.

Telephoto, 4x, Portrait Mode

Telephoto camera, 4x, Snapshot mode

Telephoto Camera, 10x, shot from a moving car

Most notably, Huawei has moved from a 1-inch main sensor to a smaller 1/1.28-inch sensor. That is not entirely unprecedented, and other brands have made similar moves before, but it still feels surprising at this level. The new 50MP main camera uses an RYYB sensor with LOFIC technology, OIS, and a 10-step physical aperture from f/1.4 to f/4.0, though aperture control is limited to Pro mode.

Huawei has also dropped the dual telephoto setup with sensor-shift technology. In its place is a 200MP 4x telephoto camera with a 1/1.28-inch RYYB sensor, an f/2.6 aperture, and OIS. The rear setup is completed by a 40MP ultra-wide camera with an f/2.2 aperture, while the front camera is a 13MP unit.

Main Camera, 1x, Night

Telephoto Camera, 4x, Night

Telephoto Camera, 20x, Night

In actual use, though, the cameras are excellent. The main and telephoto cameras are the standouts, but the ultra-wide and front cameras are also very good. Colors are generally accurate thanks to Huawei’s True-to-Color Camera system, although the XMAGE Vivid profile can look a little oversaturated in some scenes.

Switching to XMAGE Original gives images a more natural look. Photos also tend to be slightly bright and a touch over-sharpened. Even so, the overall image quality is consistently strong and easy to like.

Ultra-wide Camera, 0.6x

Main Camera, 1x

Video is strong too. All four cameras can record at up to 4K 60fps, and the footage is crisp, sharp, and pleasingly colorful. The tradeoff is that there is no 8K, no 24fps option, and no Log recording, which may be down to chipset limitations.

The weaker part of the experience is usability. There is no timer shortcut in the main camera interface, so you have to dig into settings to find it. Double-tapping the preset zoom levels also does nothing, unlike on many rival phones.

Telephoto Camera, 10x

Telephoto Camera, 20x

Telephoto Camera, 100x

They are small issues, but they make the camera app feel less polished than the image quality itself. It is a little frustrating because the hardware and output are strong enough to deserve a more refined shooting experience. Huawei gets the fundamentals right, but some of the smaller interface decisions still feel oddly behind the curve.

The EU version of the Pura 90s Pro Max comes with a 5,270mAh battery, while other regions get a larger 6,000mAh cell. Even so, battery life was still solid in my use. The phone comfortably lasted a full day with a mix of camera use, browsing, and general daily tasks.

Main Camera, 2x, B&W

That said, 5,270mAh does not feel especially big by current flagship standards. The good news is that charging is very fast. The phone supports up to 100W wired charging and up to 80W wireless charging with compatible chargers.

Sustainability

On paper, the Pura 90s Pro Max looks well protected. It is rated IP68 and IP69 for dust and water resistance, and Huawei says its Kunlun Glass offers 25 times better drop resistance and 16 times better scratch resistance. Those are strong claims, and they help reinforce the sense that this is a phone built to handle daily wear reasonably well.

The bigger issue is what happens over time. Huawei still does not clearly say how long the phone will receive software updates or security patches, and that matters just as much for a flagship at this price. Good physical protection is important, but long-term software support is what really determines how well a phone ages.

Value

Starting at €1,149, or roughly $1,250, the Pura 90s Pro Max sits firmly in flagship territory. That is still a lot of money, but compared with some other camera-focused flagships like the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, Vivo X300 Ultra, and Oppo X9 Ultra, it is around €500 to €800 cheaper. Huawei is also offering the kind of hardware you would expect at this level, including a standout design, strong cameras, a large high-quality display, and very fast charging.

At the same time, that price leaves less room to overlook the phone’s weaker points. Performance is solid rather than class-leading, the software ecosystem still comes with some friction, and Huawei remains unclear about long-term update support. That makes the Pura 90s Pro Max feel less convincing on value than some of its rivals, even if the hardware itself is often impressive.

Verdict

The Pura 90s Pro Max is a phone I ended up liking more than I expected. It looks distinctive, feels premium, and delivers where Huawei has long been strongest, especially in camera performance. There is a lot here that feels thoughtfully done, even if some of Huawei’s decisions remain a little hard to understand.

At the same time, it is not a flawless flagship. The chipset does not feel best in class, the software ecosystem still asks for compromises, and the lack of clarity around long-term support is difficult to ignore at this price. The Pura 90s Pro Max is still a very good phone, but whether it makes sense for you depends a lot on how much you value Huawei’s design and camera strengths over a more complete all-round flagship experience.

The post Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max Review: A Beautiful Comeback With Caveats first appeared on Yanko Design.

iPhone Ultra lands September 18 at $2,000 and kills the visible crease

Every foldable phone you have ever held has a crease in the middle of the display, and that crease has been the category’s most embarrassing open secret since 2019. Samsung has refined it, minimized it, and shot their devices in lighting specifically designed to hide it. Google’s Pixel Fold was a little better. The Honor Magic and Xiaomi Mix Fold each took their own runs at the problem. Seven years of collective engineering effort from the Android ecosystem later, the crease is still there, still catchable in certain light, still the thing reviewers mention in paragraph three of every foldable review. Apple has now looked at all of that and said, with characteristic confidence, that the iPhone Ultra has no visible crease.

Leaks from Fixed Focus Digital and Weibo sources describe a liquid-metal hinge from Apple’s Liquidmetal Technologies contract, but no publication has explained the actual engineering mechanism in any detail. The hinge manages bend geometry at the fold axis, paired with a display stack built to lie flat when open, eliminating the optical crease. Apple is announcing this at a September 8 or 9 keynote, with the device going on sale September 18 at a confirmed price above $2,000. That price is Ming-Chi Kuo’s floor, with his ceiling at $2,500. The design decisions behind the crease claim, the Touch ID placement, and the unusual 4:3 aspect ratio of the 7.8-inch inner panel add up to a product making several unusual bets simultaneously.

Designer: Apple

The liquid-metal hinge is the piece nobody has properly dissected yet, which is strange given how central the crease claim is to Apple’s entire design argument. Liquidmetal alloys are amorphous metallic glasses, meaning they lack the crystalline grain structure that causes conventional metals to deform plastically under repeated stress. A teardrop-shaped hinge cavity distributes the bend radius across a longer arc than a flat-fold design would, which is how Samsung has incrementally reduced crease visibility across Galaxy Z Fold generations. Apple’s version reportedly goes further, with the Liquidmetal alloy’s higher elastic recovery meaning the hinge springs back to a genuinely flat resting position. The inner display layer stack is engineered to match that geometry, reducing the optical ridge that ambient light catches and reads visually as a crease.

Touch ID came back on the side button, and it came back on Apple’s most expensive phone ever, inverting everything the fingerprint sensor stood for over the past several years. Since Face ID debuted on the iPhone X in 2017, Touch ID has been associated with the affordable tier: the SE, the iPad Air power button, the devices Apple built for people watching the price. The iPhone Ultra flips that because the physics left no alternative. The Face ID sensor stack requires a structured light projector, an infrared camera, and a flood illuminator, none of which fit inside a chassis measuring 4.8mm when open. The side-button Touch ID solution is actually more elegant for a dual-display device: one biometric input, two screen states, no awkward sensor positioning on either panel.

At 7.8 inches with a 4:3 aspect ratio, the inner display reads closer to an iPad mini than your average foldable. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 uses a 7.6-inch 22:9 inner panel, tall and narrow, better suited to scrolling than to content consumption. Apple’s near-square format is a deliberate software bet: iOS 27 developer betas already contain “foldState” and “angleDegrees” APIs, along with WWDC-previewed “app adaptability” tools designed for variable aspect ratios. The A20 Pro chip on a 2nm process, paired with 12GB of RAM, has the headroom to run genuinely iPad-grade app layouts on the open panel. Apple is essentially arguing that a foldable phone gets actually useful when its inner display is wide enough to run two apps side by side without either one feeling like a column.

Two thousand dollars is, give or take, what a MacBook Pro costs, and Apple is asking that for a phone. The design argument for that price sits across the four decisions above: a crease claim no Android foldable has credibly made, a liquid-metal hinge that actually supports it, a Touch ID side button that solves biometrics at 4.8mm, and a 4:3 inner display with the software infrastructure to back up the form factor. Supply at launch will be extremely limited, with Weibo leakers suggesting it could take three to five months for Apple to hit its 10 million unit production target. The September 18 on-sale date will be the easy part. Getting your hands on one before the holidays is the less certain proposition.

The post iPhone Ultra lands September 18 at $2,000 and kills the visible crease first appeared on Yanko Design.

Google’s Pixel 12 Could Get Cheaper as Production Leaves China for India and Vietnam

A phone’s country of assembly used to be a footnote on the back of the box. It now shapes the spec sheet, the retail price, and which storage tier survives the year. Google confirmed the Pixel 11 at $899, up a hundred dollars from the Pixel 10, with the Pro, Pro XL, and Fold each taking the same hundred-dollar step across the board. Component costs got the blame, and the blame is largely earned. Six days after launch, Nikkei Asia reported the other half of the story.

Google has told suppliers it intends to have every Pixel smartphone, watch, and wireless earbud produced outside China starting next year, with production shifting to Vietnam and India. The move follows a Pixel 11 production run in Vietnam that gave Google the confidence to commit to the full transition. The company is targeting Pixel shipments up 8 to 10 percent this year from roughly 12 million units in 2025, using the hardware as the delivery vehicle for Gemini. Manufacturing geography has become a design constraint, not a footnote.

Designer: Google

The mechanism behind the price increase is a supply war Google didn’t start and can’t fully escape. AI accelerators run on high bandwidth memory, and that memory is manufactured on the same production lines as the DRAM that goes into a phone. Mobile LPDDR5X pricing climbed 78 to 83 percent quarter over quarter this spring, according to TrendForce, and memory now accounts for 30 to 40 percent of a phone’s bill of materials, up from 10 to 15 percent in prior years. Gartner projects a 130 percent combined surge in DRAM and SSD pricing by the end of 2026, enough on its own to explain most consumer electronics price movement this year.

Google’s response to that pressure shows up as a storage decision rather than a straightforward price hike. The 128GB tier has been eliminated across the entire Pixel 11 lineup, so every model now starts at 256GB, which absorbs the increase into a spec upgrade rather than a naked price jump. It’s a smarter move than what several budget Android brands have done this year, quietly cutting RAM or downgrading displays to protect a price point. Google chose to hold the line on the experience and let the entry price move instead, which is the correct call for a flagship, even if it doesn’t change what the phone actually costs you at checkout.

Leaving China is a materially easier decision for Google than it is for Apple or Samsung, and that’s what makes the 2027 timeline credible rather than aspirational. Google sells almost no Pixel devices inside China and carries a small domestic user base there, which removes the demand-side complications that would slow down a company like Apple. Vietnam already has a mature phone manufacturing ecosystem built by Samsung, and Google is stepping into infrastructure rather than building it from zero. India, meanwhile, overtook China as the top source of US-bound smartphone shipments in 2025, a shift with obvious tariff logic behind it.

None of that repositioning fixes the underlying cost problem, though, and it’s worth being direct about that. Standing up the Vietnamese line for the Pixel 11 required new testing equipment, new tooling, and a validated production process built from scratch, none of which is free. PhoneArena’s assessment that stable pricing is the realistic outcome, rather than an outright reduction, tracks with how manufacturing transitions actually play out. Relocating a factory reduces exposure to trade policy. It does not negotiate down a DRAM contract.

The report itself carries real gaps that are worth naming rather than smoothing over. Nikkei gave no month within 2027, no sequencing across the phone, watch, and earbud lines, no cost figure, and no named contract manufacturer in either country, and Google has neither confirmed nor denied the plan. The timeline has also moved before, a January report had most of this exit happening during 2026, and Pixel production has been drifting toward Vietnam since 2019. Seven years into an exit, the finish line keeps resetting.

The real tension in this story is structural, not incidental. Google raised Pixel prices in part because AI infrastructure consumed the memory supply chain, in order to sell a phone whose entire pitch rests on AI. Whether a new factory address in Vietnam or India can hold the line at $899 is what the Pixel 12 will actually answer.

The post Google’s Pixel 12 Could Get Cheaper as Production Leaves China for India and Vietnam first appeared on Yanko Design.

Xiaomi Built a $29 Speaker That Snaps to Your Phone and Stands It Up

The compact Bluetooth speaker category has been fighting the same battle for years. Every new entry promises to be louder than your phone, smaller than a can of soda, and tough enough to survive a bag. Most deliver on those basics reasonably well, and most of them occupy the same category of objects that you put next to your phone rather than on it. That distinction tends to go unexamined, and it’s the one Xiaomi decided to question with its latest accessory.

The Xiaomi Bluetooth Speaker Magnetic Edition attaches directly to the back of a smartphone. The connection is magnetic, and a built-in Hall sensor detects the moment it locks on, triggering the speaker to power on automatically. No button to find, no pairing ritual to repeat. You put it against your phone and it starts. Pull it off and it stops. The whole interaction is designed to be immediate enough that the speaker stops feeling like an accessory and starts feeling like part of the phone itself.

Designer: Xiaomi

The stand function is the idea that makes this more than a magnet trick. Rather than simply hanging on the back while the phone lies flat, the speaker’s base props the phone upright at a comfortable viewing angle. That solves two things at once: you get a better listening experience than the phone’s own speaker provides, and you get a hands-free viewing position without hunting for a stand or balancing the phone against something that will slide the moment you look away.

The audio hardware is modest by design. A 1.5-inch full-range driver running at 3W isn’t built for a living room, and the 200Hz to 20kHz frequency response tells you this is tuned for clear, near-field playback rather than bass-heavy output. For someone cooking in the kitchen and wanting to follow a video without holding their phone, or listening at a desk without headphones, that kind of output is exactly right. The speaker isn’t competing with a dedicated tabletop Bluetooth speaker; it’s competing with a phone’s built-in speaker, and that bar it clears comfortably.

RGB lighting rings the base of the speaker and syncs its colors to the audio playing, adding some visual presence in lower light and keeping the device from reading as purely utilitarian when it’s sitting on a desk as a stand. The 650mAh battery powers the speaker independently from the phone’s own charge. Bluetooth 6.0 handles the wireless connection with AAC and SBC codec support, and the pairing typically carries over automatically each time the speaker is magnetically attached.

Two color options are available, with dark gray confirmed. Priced at 132 yuan during the Xiaomi Youpin launch period, with a suggested retail price of 199 yuan, roughly $29 or €25, it sits in a price range where the two-in-one premise doesn’t need to be flawless to be worth trying. That’s a meaningful advantage for an accessory built around a function that most people are currently meeting with improvised solutions anyway.

Most desk setups already include an accidental phone prop. A charging pad, a book corner, a keyboard edge, something doing the job that wasn’t designed for it. The Xiaomi speaker makes the argument that the prop might as well be a speaker too, and that at this size and price, consolidating both into one small object costs nothing in practicality and improves the experience every time you sit down to watch something, take a call, or simply want your hands back.

The post Xiaomi Built a $29 Speaker That Snaps to Your Phone and Stands It Up first appeared on Yanko Design.

Most Phones Last 3 Years, This $650 Fairphone 6+ Is Built for 8

The smartphone upgrade cycle has been one of the more quietly destructive consumer habits of the past two decades. Most people replace their phone every two or three years, and most of the time the reason has less to do with the device failing than with the manufacturer stopping support for it, making it feel obsolete ahead of its actual lifespan. The waste this generates at the component and material level is substantial, and the industry has largely responded with recycling pledges rather than any structural rethinking.

Fairphone has spent the better part of sixteen years making a structural argument instead. The Fairphone (Gen. 6+) is the latest iteration of that argument, and it arrives with a notable addition to its story: it’s the first Fairphone sold directly in the United States. For a phone built around the idea that longevity and repairability should be standard expectations rather than premium options, reaching the world’s largest smartphone market is a meaningful step.

Designer: Fairphone

The Gen. 6+ carries twelve user-replaceable parts, from the battery and display to the USB-C port and back cover, most swappable with a single screwdriver in under five minutes. The phone has earned iFixit’s 10/10 repairability score, making it the fifth consecutive Fairphone to do so. Spare parts are guaranteed to be available until 2033, and the five-year warranty covers the device for as long as most people own a phone at all.

That repairability doesn’t come at the cost of ignoring performance. The Gen. 6+ runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 paired with 12GB of RAM, which is a meaningful step up from the Gen. 6’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 and 8GB. The 6.31-inch LTPO AMOLED display runs at an adaptive 10–120 Hz with up to 1,400 nits of peak brightness, and the 4,415mAh removable battery delivers up to two days between charges, with fast charging reaching 50% in 30 minutes.

The camera system centers on a 50MP Sony LYTIA sensor with optical image stabilization, supported by a 13MP ultrawide and a 32 MP front-facing camera. It’s a capable setup for the mid-range segment it occupies, handling 4K video at 30 fps and slow-motion recording up to 1080p at 120 fps. What’s worth noting is that the camera module, like everything else in the phone, is replaceable. A damaged lens or degraded sensor doesn’t mean the device is finished.

The phone’s physical design includes a dedicated switch, called Fairphone Moments, that toggles between full functionality and a stripped-back mode that limits access to only what you’ve decided matters. It’s a small thing, but it addresses a real pattern: most of us don’t need every app and notification available every hour of the day, and having a physical switch to enforce that boundary is more reliable than navigating a settings menu under pressure.

The materials list is as deliberate as everything else. The phone uses 51% fair or recycled materials by weight, including Fairmined gold and tungsten, recycled aluminum, copper, steel, and plastics, along with Fair Cobalt Credits applied to cobalt sourcing. It ships in plastic-free packaging. The Gen. 6+ is available in Cobalt Blue, Forest Green, and Horizon Black, priced at €649 in Europe and $649.99 in the US.

For a device this thoughtfully constrained, the case for it doesn’t rest on outpacing the competition on any single spec. It rests on the idea that a phone lasting seven or eight years has more value, environmental and financial, than one that lasts three, and that keeping it alive should never require shipping it off to a service center.

The post Most Phones Last 3 Years, This $650 Fairphone 6+ Is Built for 8 first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Redmi K100 Pro Turns Its Glass Back Into a Glowing Sketchpad

Photoluminescent material is not new. It is the stuff in your kid’s ceiling stars, in old wristwatch dials, in every glow stick you have ever cracked at a concert. What is new is putting that decades old chemistry on the back of a flagship smartphone and letting the owner become the artist instead of the factory. That is exactly what Redmi did with the K100 Pro, and it might be the single most fun thing to happen to phone design all year, mostly because it does not take itself too seriously.

The finish is called Glowing Firefly, and it works by hiding a luminescent layer between the phone’s glass back and its green ink coating, invisible in daylight and glowing wherever you point a flashlight or light pen after dark. Redmi launched the K100 Pro in China on August 11, pairing the party trick with a legitimately serious spec sheet that includes a 185Hz OLED, a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series chip, and a 200MP camera. The phone can keep up with any flagship on paper. It just also happens to double as a doodle pad.

Designer: Xiaomi

Redmi’s own language calls the back panel a light painting canvas, and that description holds up better than most marketing copy tends to. Point a flashlight, a laser pointer, or a dedicated light pen at the glass and the material soaks up the energy along the exact path the light traveled, then releases it slowly as a glowing outline. Write your name, sketch a smiley face, sign the thing like a yearbook, and watch it fade out over the following minutes. There is no chip involved, no battery drain, nothing to charge separately. It is closer to a Lite Brite than to anything Qualcomm builds, which is honestly the charm of it.

Nothing tried something adjacent with the Phone 2a Plus Community Edition, and I still think about that phone. It used a green phosphorescent coating along the ribbon cables and camera trim, charged by ambient light and glowing softly on its own without any input from you. It was quiet, tasteful, very on brand for a company obsessed with making internals look intentional. Redmi took that same chemistry and handed the pen to the user instead of the factory. One phone glows because the designers told it to. The other glows because you told it to, and that distinction matters more than it sounds.

None of this changes what the K100 Pro is underneath the finish, a genuinely stacked gaming flagship with an 8,580mAh battery, 100W charging, and a cooling system built for long sessions. But the spec sheet was never going to be the reason anyone remembers this phone. The reason is a green slab that lets you leave a temporary signature in light, fading like sidewalk chalk, gone by morning, ready for you to draw on it again tomorrow.

The post The Redmi K100 Pro Turns Its Glass Back Into a Glowing Sketchpad first appeared on Yanko Design.