Jodi Arias Homicide Retrial is Starting in March


The second half of the trial is to begin in the middle of March. Jodi Arias, the Californian waitress was earlier on found guilty of manslaughter. She stabbed her boyfriend at least two dozen times...
    






Jury Awards Apple $290 Million in Damages Straight out of Samsung’s Pocket


While the amount of $290 million was slightly less than the $380 million expected by Apple, it would do for now. Besides, Apple made it quite clear that the whole issue was not about money but rather...

Apple v. Samsung lawsuit inches closer to a conclusion, jury revises total damages due Apple to $888 million (update)

When Apple was awarded over $1 billion in damages at the conclusion of the tech trial of the century (until the next one, at least), we knew that the ultimate price paid by Samsung would be different. Why? A few months after the jury announced its calculations, presiding judge Lucy Koh ordered a retrial regarding $450 million of the original award because the jury based that number on some faulty legal logic. In this second damages calculation proceeding, Apple has asked that the jury adjust the award to $380 million, while Samsung argued it only owes $52 million. Today, the jury has settled between those two numbers, and Samsung's revised legal tab is $290 million. That number, when combined with the $598 million not at issue in the retrial brings the total Samsung owes to $888 million.

Of course, this latest decision doesn't change anything but dollar signs -- the court's earlier finding of infringement upon Apple's patents still stands. Still, with the damages settled, the case is closer than ever to a conclusion, though the lawyers on both sides still have plenty left to do. There are still post-retrial motions and appeals to be filed, as has been the case with prior rulings made during the case. Still, at least now we know just how big a check Samsung will have to write if and when those appeals cease.

Update: We reached out to Apple about today's proceedings and a company rep offered the following response about the protection of "hard work":

For Apple, this case has always been about more than patents and money. It has been about innovation and the hard work that goes into inventing products that people love. While it's impossible to put a price tag on those values, we are grateful to the jury for showing Samsung that copying has a cost.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Schiller Says Samsung Responsible for Damaging Apple’s Brand


Phil Schiller, the marketing guru at Apple Incorporated has spoken out against Samsung at a retrial. It was a case of Apple versus Samsung and Schiller was the last one at the witness stand from...